Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis and Probiotic Characterization of 5-Methoxytryptophan-Producing Strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strain and Growth Conditions
2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing
2.3. Sequence Quality Control and Hybrid Assembly
2.4. Taxonomic Identification and Phylogenomics
2.5. Genome Annotation and CAZyme Profiling
2.6. Comparative Genomics and Gene Mining
2.7. Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance Assays
2.8. Antioxidant Activity Assays
2.8.1. Live Cells
2.8.2. Cell-Free Extract (CFE)
2.8.3. Cell-Free Fermentation Supernatant (CFS)
2.9. Carbohydrate Fermentation Profile Assays
2.10. Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Auto-Aggregation
2.11. Adhesion to Intestinal Epithelial Cells, Caco-2
2.12. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests
2.13. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Genome Assembly and General Features
3.2. Taxonomic Assignment and Phylogenomic Analysis
3.3. Phenotypic Probiotic Properties
3.3.1. Acid and Bile Salt Tolerance
3.3.2. Antioxidant Activity
3.3.3. Carbohydrate Fermentation Profile
3.3.4. Auto-Aggregation and Surface Hydrophobicity
3.3.5. Adhesion to Caco-2 Human Epithelial Cells
3.3.6. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile
3.4. Genotypic Characterization of Probiotic and Functional Traits
3.4.1. Genomic Basis for Stress Tolerance
3.4.2. Genomic Basis for Antioxidant Pathways
3.4.3. Genomic Basis for Carbohydrate Utilization
3.4.4. Genomic Basis for Cell Adhesion
3.4.5. Intrinsic Susceptibility Markers
3.5. Comparative Genomics and 5-MTP Biosynthesis Potential
3.6. Safety Evaluation
3.6.1. Acquired Antibiotic Resistance Genes
3.6.2. Virulence Factors and Biogenic Amines
4. Discussion
4.1. Taxonomy of L. paracasei RM081
4.2. Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in Probiotic Performance
4.3. Biosynthesis and Evolutionary Origins of Postbiotic 5-MTP
4.4. Safety Assessment and Non-Transferability
4.5. Methodological Limitations and Future Perspectives
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Filidou, E.; Kandilogiannakis, L.; Shrewsbury, A.; Kolios, G.; Kotzampassi, K. Probiotics: Shaping the gut immunological responses. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 30, 2096–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pessione, E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: Lights and shadows. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, C.; Dokter-Fokkens, J.; Figueroa Lozano, S.; Zhang, Q.; de Haan, B.J.; Zhang, H.; Faas, M.M.; de Vos, P. Lactic Acid Bacteria May Impact Intestinal Barrier Function by Modulating Goblet Cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1700572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Darbandi, A.; Asadi, A.; Mahdizade Ari, M.; Ohadi, E.; Talebi, M.; Halaj Zadeh, M.; Darb Emamie, A.; Ghanavati, R.; Kakanj, M. Bacteriocins: Properties and potential use as antimicrobials. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Judkins, T.C.; Archer, D.L.; Kramer, D.C.; Solch, R.J. Probiotics, Nutrition, and the Small Intestine. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2020, 22, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, W.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Pan, Y.; Wang, M.; Xu, Y.; Gao, J.; Cui, H.; Li, C.; Chen, H.; et al. Molecular identification and probiotic potential characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the pigs with superior immune responses. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1361860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Algieri, F.; Tanaskovic, N.; Rincon, C.C.; Notario, E.; Braga, D.; Pesole, G.; Rusconi, R.; Penna, G.; Rescigno, M. Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-5220-derived postbiotic protects from the leaky-gut. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1157164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dong, H.; Ren, X.; Song, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhuang, H.; Peng, C.; Zhao, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, J.; Zang, J.; et al. Assessment of Multifunctional Activity of a Postbiotic Preparation Derived from Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Postbiotic-P6. Foods 2024, 13, 2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hsu, W.T.; Tseng, Y.H.; Jui, H.Y.; Kuo, C.C.; Wu, K.K.; Lee, C.M. 5-Methoxytryptophan attenuates postinfarct cardiac injury by controlling oxidative stress and immune activation. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2021, 158, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossoni, R.D.; de Barros, P.P.; Mendonca, I.D.C.; Medina, R.P.; Silva, D.H.S.; Fuchs, B.B.; Junqueira, J.C.; Mylonakis, E. The Postbiotic Activity of Lactobacillus paracasei 28.4 Against Candida auris. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salminen, S.; Collado, M.C.; Endo, A.; Hill, C.; Lebeer, S.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Sanders, M.E.; Shamir, R.; Swann, J.R.; Szajewska, H.; et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 649–667, Erratum in Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.Y.; Lin, Y.C.; Wu, Y.L.; Cheng, T.H.; Hung, M.Y.; Chen, Y.T.; Wu, J.Y.; Kuo, C.C.; Chen, Y.P. Bovine raw milk-isolated Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081 with producing anti-inflammatory metabolite 5-methoxytryptophan ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Appl. Food Res. 2026, 6, 102179. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, K.K.; Kuo, C.C.; Yet, S.F.; Lee, C.M.; Liou, J.Y. 5-methoxytryptophan: An arsenal against vascular injury and inflammation. J. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 27, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Raethong, N.; Santivarangkna, C.; Visessanguan, W.; Santiyanont, P.; Mhuantong, W.; Chokesajjawatee, N. Whole-genome sequence analysis for evaluating the safety and probiotic potential of Lactiplantibacillus pentosus 9D3, a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-producing strain isolated from Thai pickled weed. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 969548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A.; Lane, D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olson, R.D.; Assaf, R.; Brettin, T.; Conrad, N.; Cucinell, C.; Davis, J.J.; Dempsey, D.M.; Dickerman, A.; Dietrich, E.M.; Kenyon, R.W.; et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): A resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D678–D689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richter, M.; Rossello-Mora, R.; Oliver Glockner, F.; Peplies, J. JSpeciesWS: A web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Goker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.; Yang, J.; Yu, J.; Yao, Z.; Sun, L.; Shen, Y.; Jin, Q. VFDB: A reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, D325–D328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bortolaia, V.; Kaas, R.S.; Ruppe, E.; Roberts, M.C.; Schwarz, S.; Cattoir, V.; Philippon, A.; Allesoe, R.L.; Rebelo, A.R.; Florensa, A.F.; et al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wishart, D.S.; Han, S.; Saha, S.; Oler, E.; Peters, H.; Grant, J.R.; Stothard, P.; Gautam, V. PHASTEST: Faster than PHASTER, better than PHAST. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W443–W450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carattoli, A.; Hasman, H. PlasmidFinder and In Silico pMLST: Identification and Typing of Plasmid Replicons in Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2075, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, J.; Lu, F.; Luo, Y.; Bie, L.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y. OrthoVenn3: An integrated platform for exploring and visualizing orthologous data across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W397–W403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chooruk, A.; Piwat, S.; Teanpaisan, R. Antioxidant activity of various oral Lactobacillus strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 123, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 35th ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2025; 396p. [Google Scholar]
- Koo, O.K.; Amalaradjou, M.A.; Bhunia, A.K. Recombinant probiotic expressing Listeria adhesion protein attenuates Listeria monocytogenes virulence in vitro. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veljovic, K.; Popovic, N.; Miljkovic, M.; Tolinacki, M.; Terzic-Vidojevic, A.; Kojic, M. Novel Aggregation Promoting Factor AggE Contributes to the Probiotic Properties of Enterococcus faecium BGGO9-28. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vastano, V.; Pagano, A.; Fusco, A.; Merola, G.; Sacco, M.; Donnarumma, G. The Lactobacillus plantarum Eno A1 Enolase Is Involved in Immunostimulation of Caco-2 Cells and in Biofilm Development. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 897, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aguilera, L.; Ferreira, E.; Gimenez, R.; Fernandez, F.J.; Taules, M.; Aguilar, J.; Vega, M.C.; Badia, J.; Baldoma, L. Secretion of the housekeeping protein glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase by the LEE-encoded type III secretion system in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 955–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yasuda, E.; Serata, M.; Sako, T. Suppressive effect on activation of macrophages by Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota genes determining the synthesis of cell wall-associated polysaccharides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4746–4755, Erratum in Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azcarate-Peril, M.A.; McAuliffe, O.; Altermann, E.; Lick, S.; Russell, W.M.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Microarray analysis of a two-component regulatory system involved in acid resistance and proteolytic activity in Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5794–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, C.T.; Chao, W.Y.; Lin, C.H.; Shih, T.W.; Pan, T.M. Comprehensive Safety Assessment of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei NTU 101 Through Integrated Genotypic and Phenotypic Analysis. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46, 12354–12374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bender, G.R.; Marquis, R.E. Membrane ATPases and acid tolerance of Actinomyces viscosus and Lactobacillus casei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53, 2124–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pfeiler, E.A.; Klaenhammer, T.R. Role of transporter proteins in bile tolerance of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6013–6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sonnenburg, J.L.; Xu, J.; Leip, D.D.; Chen, C.H.; Westover, B.P.; Weatherford, J.; Buhler, J.D.; Gordon, J.I. Glycan foraging in vivo by an intestine-adapted bacterial symbiont. Science 2005, 307, 1955–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, Y.C.; Cheng, Y.C.; Lee, C.C.; Hsu, H.Y.; Cheng, Y.F.; Lin, S.H.; Lin, J.S.; Young, S.L.; Watanabe, K. Assessment of the Safety and Potential Probiotic Properties of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP28 Based on Whole Genome Sequencing and Phenotypic and Oral Toxicity Analyses. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, T.; Liang, J.; Liu, J.; Ye, Q.; Farid, M.S.; Ji, Y.; Zheng, K.; Pan, D.; Chen, B.; Zhang, T.; et al. Gastrointestinal tolerance enhancement of the LPxTG-motif surface protein overexpressed Lactobacillus reuteri SH23 in vivo. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2025, 105, 8498–8510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Munoz-Provencio, D.; Llopis, M.; Antolin, M.; de Torres, I.; Guarner, F.; Perez-Martinez, G.; Monedero, V. Adhesion properties of Lactobacillus casei strains to resected intestinal fragments and components of the extracellular matrix. Arch. Microbiol. 2009, 191, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Lu, W. Lactic acid bacteria-derived exopolysaccharide: Formation, immunomodulatory ability, health effects, and structure-function relationship. Microbiol. Res. 2023, 274, 127432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marco, M.L.; Bongers, R.S.; de Vos, W.M.; Kleerebezem, M. Spatial and temporal expression of Lactobacillus plantarum genes in the gastrointestinal tracts of mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Granato, D.; Bergonzelli, G.E.; Pridmore, R.D.; Marvin, L.; Rouvet, M.; Corthesy-Theulaz, I.E. Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) to human intestinal cells and mucins. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2160–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, H.H.; Kuo, C.C.; Yan, J.L.; Chen, H.L.; Lin, W.C.; Wang, K.H.; Tsai, K.K.; Guven, H.; Flaberg, E.; Szekely, L.; et al. Control of cyclooxygenase-2 expression and tumorigenesis by endogenous 5-methoxytryptophan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13231–13236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sun, P.; Xu, S.; Tian, Y.; Chen, P.; Wu, D.; Zheng, P. 4-Hydroxyphenylacetate 3-Hydroxylase (4HPA3H): A Vigorous Monooxygenase for Versatile O-Hydroxylation Applications in the Biosynthesis of Phenolic Derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Sultan, S.A.; T, R.; Chen, X. Biotechnological applications of S-adenosyl-methionine-dependent methyltransferases for natural products biosynthesis and diversification. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, L.Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Cheng, H.H.; Kuo, C.C.; Wu, K.K. Endothelium-Derived 5-Methoxytryptophan Protects Endothelial Barrier Function by Blocking p38 MAPK Activation. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhu, Z.; Cheng, F.; Ai, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhao, F.; Cheng, P. 5-Methoxytryptophan Alleviates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis by Inhibiting the Intestinal Epithelial Damage and Inflammatory Response. Mediat. Inflamm. 2024, 2024, 1484806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP); Rychen, G.; Aquilina, G.; Azimonti, G.; Bampidis, V.; de Lourdes Bastos, M.; Bories, G.; Chesson, A.; Cocconcelli, P.S.; Flachowsky, G.; et al. Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anisimova, E.A.; Yarullina, D.R. Antibiotic Resistance of LACTOBACILLUS Strains. Curr. Microbiol. 2019, 76, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koshla, O.; Lopatniuk, M.; Borys, O.; Misaki, Y.; Kravets, V.; Ostash, I.; Shemediuk, A.; Ochi, K.; Luzhetskyy, A.; Fedorenko, V.; et al. Genetically engineered rpsL merodiploidy impacts secondary metabolism and antibiotic resistance in Streptomyces. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vickers, A.A.; Chopra, I.; O’Neill, A.J. Intrinsic novobiocin resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4484–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Danielsen, M.; Wind, A. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mathur, S.; Singh, R. Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morroni, G.; Di Cesare, A.; Di Sante, L.; Brenciani, A.; Vignaroli, C.; Pasquaroli, S.; Giovanetti, E.; Sabatino, R.; Rossi, L.; Magnani, M.; et al. Enterococcus faecium ST17 from Coastal Marine Sediment Carrying Transferable Multidrug Resistance Plasmids. Microb. Drug Resist. 2016, 22, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elnar, A.G.; Kim, G.B. Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecalis CAUM157. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1563444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hill, C. Virulence or niche factors: What’s in a name? J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 5725–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Krawczyk, B.; Wityk, P.; Galecka, M.; Michalik, M. The Many Faces of Enterococcus spp.-Commensal, Probiotic and Opportunistic Pathogen. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






| Feature | Value |
|---|---|
| Chromosome Size (bp) | 3,084,987 |
| Chromosome GC Content (%) | 46.26% |
| Plasmid 1 Size (bp) | 6696 |
| Plasmid 2 Size (bp) | 9600 |
| Plasmid 3 Size (bp) | 6373 |
| Plasmid 4 Size (bp) | 47,991 |
| Total Genome Size (bp) | 3,155,647 |
| Average GC Content (%) | 46.19% |
| Protein-coding genes (CDSs) | 3096 |
| tRNA genes | 59 |
| rRNA genes | 15 (5 operons) |
| CheckM Completeness (%) | 99.09% |
| CheckM Contamination (%) | 0.74% |
| Deposition Accession (NCBI) | accession |
| Carbohydrate | Result | Carbohydrate | Result | Carbohydrate | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | - | D-mannitol | + | D-raffinose | + |
| Erythritol | - | D-sorbitol | - | Starch | - |
| D-arabinose | - | Methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside | - | Glycogen | - |
| L-arabinose | + | Methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside | - | Xylitol | - |
| D-ribose | + | N-acetylglucosamine | + | Gentiobiose | + |
| D-xylose | - | Amygdalin | - | D-turanose | + |
| L-xylose | - | Arbutin | + | D-lyxose | - |
| D-adonitol | - | Esculin ferric citrate | - | D-tagatose | + |
| Methyl-β-D-xylopyranoside | - | Salicin | + | D-fucose | - |
| D-galactose | + | D-cellobiose | + | L-fucose | - |
| D-glucose | + | D-maltose | + | D-arabitol | - |
| D-fructose | + | D-lactose | + | L-arabitol | - |
| D-mannose | + | D-melibiose | - | Potassium gluconate | - |
| L-sorbose | - | D-sucrose | + | Potassium 2-ketogluconate | - |
| L-rhamnose | - | D-trehalose | + | Potassium 5-ketogluconate | - |
| Dulcitol | - | Inulin | - | ||
| Inositol | - | D-melezitose | + |
| Cell Surface Properties | Value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-aggregation (5 h) | 85.0 ± 0.7% | High auto-aggregation |
| Cell surface hydrophobicity (n-hexadecane) | 71.5 ± 2.4% | High hydrophobic |
| Antibiotic Susceptibility | Concentration per Disc (μg per Tablet) | Diameter (mm) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin | 10 | 35.0 ± 0.5 mm | Susceptible |
| Erythromycin | 15 | 32.0 ± 0.6 mm | Susceptible |
| Chloramphenicol | 30 | 30.0 ± 0.3 mm | Susceptible |
| Tetracycline | 30 | 30.0 ± 0.3 mm | Susceptible |
| Streptomycin | 10 | 0 mm | Resistant |
| Novobiocin | 5 | 20.2 ± 0.4 mm | Intermediate |
| Feature Category | Detected Elements/Status | Functional Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) | None detected | Indicates safe genomic profile for probiotic use |
| Biogenic Amine (BA) Production | None detected | Safe for human consumption |
| Plasmids | 4 plasmids (No AMR genes) | Safe; no mobile AMR elements detected |
| Prophages | 5 intact regions (No AMR genes) | Safe; no mobile AMR elements detected |
| Virulence Factors | lap, efaA | Putative adhesins; beneficial for gut colonization [27,28] |
| eno, gapA | Moonlighting proteins; support intestinal adhesion [29,30] | |
| cps | Polysaccharide capsule synthesis; aids in stress tolerance [31] | |
| lisR | Two-component systems; enhance acid and bile survival [32] | |
| Hemolysin transporter homolog | Common in LAB; non-pathogenic trait [33] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Chen, Y.-Y.; Abay, A.; Asan, M.A.; Lin, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-P. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis and Probiotic Characterization of 5-Methoxytryptophan-Producing Strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14071431
Chen Y-Y, Abay A, Asan MA, Lin Y-C, Chen Y-P. Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis and Probiotic Characterization of 5-Methoxytryptophan-Producing Strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(7):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14071431
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Yu-Yi, Alican Abay, Muhammet Ali Asan, Yu-Chun Lin, and Yen-Po Chen. 2026. "Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis and Probiotic Characterization of 5-Methoxytryptophan-Producing Strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081" Microorganisms 14, no. 7: 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14071431
APA StyleChen, Y.-Y., Abay, A., Asan, M. A., Lin, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-P. (2026). Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis and Probiotic Characterization of 5-Methoxytryptophan-Producing Strain Lacticaseibacillus paracasei RM081. Microorganisms, 14(7), 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14071431

