Next Article in Journal
From Surfaces to Spillover: Environmental Persistence and Indirect Transmission of Influenza A(H3N8) Virus
Previous Article in Journal
LuxR-Type Regulator RRP6 Positively Regulates the Biosynthesis of Plantaricin EF and Improves Its Production in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 163
Previous Article in Special Issue
Next-Generation Nucleic Acid-Based Diagnostics for Viral Pathogens: Lessons Learned from the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An ICU Outbreak Due to Two Populations of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to ST11 and ST39 Types, Harbouring Double Carbapenemase Genes

by
Olga Koutsopetra
1,2,
Sophia Vourli
3,
Georgios Stravopodis
4,
Sophia Hatzianastasiou
4,
Stavros Dimopoulos
5,
Themistocles Chamogeorgakis
5,
Despina Tassi-Papatheou
6,
Spyros Pournaras
2 and
Joseph Papaparaskevas
1,6,*
1
Department of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
2
Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, “Attikon” University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 12461 Chaidari, Greece
3
Institute of Biosciences and Applications, National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos”, 15341 Agia Paraskevi, Greece
4
Infectious Disease Committee, “Onassis” Hospital, 17674 Kallithea, Greece
5
Surgical and Transplantation Intensive Care Unit, “Onassis” Hospital, 17674 Kallithea, Greece
6
Microbiology Laboratory, “Onassis” Hospital, 17674 Kallithea, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2781; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122781 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 October 2025 / Revised: 30 November 2025 / Accepted: 4 December 2025 / Published: 6 December 2025

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates harbouring double carbapenemases, from patients in a surgical and transplantation ICU, were investigated to better understand the dispersion of the pathogen. Twenty-three carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates harbouring at least two different carbapenemases (by immunochromatography screening), were consecutively collected during a seven-month period from patients in a surgical and transplantation ICU. Identification and susceptibility testing were performed using the MALDI-TOF Vitek MS and the Vitek2 system (BioMerieux), respectively. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in an Illumina NextSeq2000 platform and MLST and resistome analysis of assembled genomes were performed by ResFinder, through the Center for Genomic Epidemiology platform. All isolates were resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and most to meropenem–varbobactam. Seventeen isolates belonged to the ST11 type and were positive for the OXA-48/NDM combination (by immunochromatography and NGS). Four isolates belonged to the ST39 type and were positive for the KPC/NDM combination (by immunochromatography and NGS). Finally, two isolates belonged to the ST258 type. One of them was positive for the OXA-48/KPC/NDM combination (by immunochromatography), but only blaKPC was detected by WGS, and the second was positive for the OXA-48/KPC combination (by immunochromatography) and confirmed by WGS. This is the first report of an outbreak in Greece due to two simultaneous carbapenem-resistant populations harbouring double carbapenemases: a larger one comprising ST11 isolates harbouring the combination blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48, coupled by a smaller one comprising ST39 isolates harbouring the combination blaKPC-2/blaNDM-1. The implications of this particular situation regarding public health as well as intra-nosocomial infection prevention and control should be further monitored and studied.

1. Introduction

The genus Klebsiella comprises species that are frequent causes of infections, both nosocomial and community-associated, including bloodstream, respiratory tract, urinary tract, and surgical wound infections [1]. Nosocomial Klebsiella infections are caused mainly by the species Klebsiella pneumoniae, the most clinically significant species of the genus; to a much lesser degree, K. oxytoca has also been isolated from nosocomial infections. It is estimated that Klebsiella spp. cause 8% of all nosocomial bacterial infections in the United States and in Europe [2].
Resistance to carbapenems has increased considerably due to the acquisition of carbapenemase genes located in plasmids and mobile genetic elements, and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates are now frequently isolated from patients in ICUs around the world [3]. The clinically most significant types of carbapenemases comprise NDM, IMP, VIM, OXA-48, and KPC; production of these genes is currently the main molecular mechanism responsible for carbapenem resistance, whilst outer membrane protein (Omp) deficiency contributes as a secondary mechanism [4]. KPC production is the most prevalent mechanism on a global basis [5] and is often associated with the predominance of certain sequence types (STs), such as ST11 and ST39 [1].
During the last decade, double mechanisms of carbapenemases have been identified among CRKP, posing a new threat for the successful antimicrobial therapy of patients. For example, KPC-2/NDM-1-producing K. pneumoniae isolates have been identified in various settings around the world [1,6,7]. These isolates belong to different STs, although up to now they have not been detected among types considered to be hypervirulent. Nevertheless, these hypervirulent K. pneumoniae lineages are increasingly acquiring carbapenemase genes, representing a concerning shift toward convergent hypervirulent–resistant phenotypes [8].
In Greece up to now, double carbapenemase genes have been identified in certain hospitals, mostly as single isolates or smaller outbreaks [1]; however, it should be noted that the main mechanisms of resistance in Greek hospitals are either the KPC or the NDM ones.
In that respect a potential outbreak due to isolates possessing double carbapenemases may create a new threat in the hospital environment and it should be further investigated. Taking all that into account, and after the first isolation of a CRKP strain with two genes in our hospital, we investigated all CRKP isolated from patients at the Cardiac Surgery and Heart and Lung Transplantation ICU that were harbouring potential double carbapenemases with regard to the mechanisms of resistance and their sequence types.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection, Bacteria Selection, Identification, and Susceptibility Testing

Clinical specimens were consecutively collected from patients hospitalized at the 25-bed Cardiac Surgery and Heart and Lung Transplantation Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the “Onassis” Hospital, during a seven-month period (October 2022 to April 2023). Specimens comprised blood, bronchial secretions, sputum, purulent wound exudates, urine, nasal swabs, and catheter tips.
Cultures were performed on MacConkey, 5% horse blood, chocolate and sabouraud agar plates, and thioglycolate broth (Bioprepare Microbiology, 19101, Keratea, Greece). Additionally, blood cultures were performed on a BacTAlert 3D automated blood culture system (bioMerieux, Marcy L’Etoile, France).
Identification of the isolates was performed using the VITEK® MS PRIME Mass Spectrometry Microbial Identification System (bioMérieux). Susceptibility testing and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) determination was performed using the VITEK® 2 COMPACT automated susceptibility testing (bioMérieux) at the time of isolation, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except for meropenem-vaborbactam which was performed using gradient MIC Test Strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi 64026, Italy). Breakpoints and guidelines used for the study analysis were those of the EUCAST v15.0 document (available from https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints, accessed on 25 October 2025).
The presumptive presence of carbapenemases was investigated from the bacterial culture using the qualitative lateral flow immunoassay NG-Test® CARBA-5 (NG—Biotech, Z.A., Courbouton, France) which detects and differentiates the five most prevalent carbapenemase types (NDM, IMP, VIM, OXA-48, and KPC).
Isolates were selected for inclusion in the study based on the following criteria:
  • Species identification as Klebsiella pneumoniae.
  • Resistance to imipenem and/or meropenem and/or ertapenem.
  • Presence by the lateral flow immunoassay of at least two or more carbapenemases.
  • One isolate per patient, the first one from any clinical specimen. If, however, a second isolate from a patient already enrolled, presenting with a different carbapenemase combination was detected, then this isolate was also included in the study as a different one.

2.2. Whole Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA from a 24 h culture of the isolates on 5% horse blood agar plates was extracted using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored in −20 °C for further analysis.
DNA quantification was performed using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Singapore). Whole genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina NextSeq 2000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with DNA fragment libraries prepared using the Nextera XT kit (Illumina), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
The short sequencing reads, in FastQ format, were assembled into FastA format using the Unicycler Assembly Pipeline (Galaxy Version 0.5.0) via the online platform www.galaxy.com.

2.3. MLST and Phylogenetic Analysis

Isolates were analyzed using MLST (Software version: 2.0.9) via the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) online platform (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org last accesed on 1 July 2025), comparing the sequences of the genes gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB to reference sequences from the MLST database, assigning allele numbers based on sequence differences.
Phylogenetic classification was performed using the MEGA11 platform (Software Version 11). The genome of K. pneumoniae isolate MGH-78578 (GenBank: CP000647.1) was used as a reference.

2.4. Resistome Investigation

The resistance genes of each strain were identified using the ResFinder platform (CGE, version: 4.5.0) via the CGE online service by comparing the assembled genome to known genomes in the database to identify resistance genes. A 90% ID threshold was set, representing the minimum percentage of identical nucleotides between the best-matching resistance gene in the database and the genome sequence. Additionally, a 60% minimum length threshold was selected, representing the minimum nucleotide overlap needed to count a gene as reliable.
Resistance genes were analyzed in strains phenotypically displaying a combination of resistance mechanisms. The resistance genes examined were linked to antibiotic groups such as beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, macrolides, quinolones, fosfomycin, amphenicols, quaternary ammonium compounds, and folate pathway antagonists.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

A limited set of patients’ data was used anonymously (no clinical data was used, only data related to the bacterial isolates). The work has been approved by the hospital ethical committee.

3. Results

A total of 23 CRKP isolates were identified by MALDI and collected during the study period from 20 patients. Specimens included sterile sites (blood/urine), bronchial secretions from patients with pneumonia symptoms, and surgical wound infections (eight, eight and four cases, respectively), as well as non-sterile and screening sites (sputum, nasal swab and i.v. catheter tip, in one, one and one cases, respectively).
Based on the lateral flow assay screening results, the isolates were grouped into two main groups, 17 isolates harbouring the NDM/OXA-48 combination and four isolates harbouring the NDM/KPC combination. Finally, the combinations KPC/OXA-48 and OXA-48/KPC/NDM were detected among one and one isolates, respectively. Detailed results are depicted in Table 1.
The 23 CRKP strains showed resistance to multiple antibiotics, according to the susceptibility testing performed, and the detailed results of Table 2. More specifically, the 17 isolates of the dominant group were resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem, whilst 11/17 (64.7%) were mostly highly resistant to the combination of meropenem–vaborbactam. The four isolates of the second group were all fully resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and meropenem–vaborbactam.
MLST results are presented in Table 3, respectively. All isolates belonged to main clonal group CG10011. The isolates of the dominant group (17/23, 73.9%) belonged to type ST11, whilst the four isolates of the second group belonged to type ST39. Finally, the two remaining isolates belonged to ST258.
The phylogenetic tree of the 23 isolates is shown in Figure 1.
Resistome analysis is depicted in Table 4. A total of 22 out of the 23 isolates were found to harbour two carbapenemase genes. More specifically, all 17 isolates assigned to ST11 were found to harbour the combination blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48, and all four isolates assigned to ST39 were found to harbour the combination blaNDM-1/blaKPC-2, whilst one of the two isolates assigned to type ST258 (isolate #22) was found to harbour the combination blaKPC-3/blaOXA-48, and the other one (isolate #17) was found to harbour only blaKPC-3. The carbapenem resistance genes results corresponded well with the lateral flow assays results, except for isolate #17.
In addition, resistome analysis indicated that the ST39 isolates harboured a considerably higher number of beta-lactamase genes, and more specifically the blaSHV-79, blaSHV-89, blaSHV-40, blaSHV-85, blaSHV-56, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-1B, blaTEM-207, blaTEM-230, blaTEM-104, blaTEM-234, blaTEM-217, blaTEM-30, and blaTEM-198 genes, whilst the ST11 isolates mostly harboured only the blaOXA-1, blaSHV-182, blaCTX-M-15, and blaTEM-1B genes.

4. Discussion

The initial isolation of the first CRKP strain containing double carbapenemases (CRKP-DC) as shown by the lateral flow assay (isolate #8) indicated the onset of this particular outbreak and triggered the present study, which focused on strains identified as K. pneumoniae by MALDI, resistant to at least one of the antibiotics of the carbapenem group by MIC measurement, and found to possess at least two different carbapenemases by the initial test. Prior to strain #8 isolation, the sporadic CRKP that were detected in our ICU were mostly KPC(+) and were introduced through patient transfer from other hospitals.
The majority of the isolates included in the study (20/23) were from sterile sites, monomicrobial surgical site infections or bronchial specimens in patients with pneumonia, and only three isolates were from non-sterile sites or screening specimens.
Both the lateral flow assay and the sequencing data allocated the majority of the 23 CRKP-DC isolates into two main groups. The dominant one was Group A and consisted of isolates #1–15, 18, and 21, belonging to ST11, harbouring the combination blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48 and resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and the majority to meropenem–vaborbactam. In contrast, Group B consisted of isolates #16, 19, 20, and 23, belonging to ST39, harbouring the blaKPC-2/blaNDM-1 combination, all fully resistant to ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and meropenem–vaborbactam.
Although CRKP-DC have previously been described in Greece, CRKP-DC ST11 isolates are infrequent and only a single strain with similar characteristics has been reported previously in Thessaloniki, Greece [1]. In similar international studies from Italy [9] and Germany [10] strains identified with the combination blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48 belonged to types ST15 and ST383 in Italy and ST307 in Germany, but not ST11. Finally, in another study from Iran [11], CRKP-DC isolates expressing various combinations of blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, and blaNDM-7 genes were reported, belonging not to a single but to various sequencing types, including ST11, ST893, ST147, ST392, and ST15, but not ST11.
In contrast to the infrequent isolation of CRKP-DC ST11 isolates, CRKP-DC ST39 isolates have previously been detected in our country in various settings [12,13,14] and the gene combinations that were detected were either the blaKPC-2/blaVIM-1 or the blaKPC-2/blaNDM-1. In other Greek hospitals, the CRKP-DC isolates harboured the blaKPC-2/blaVIM-1 genes and were clustered in various STs (ST39, ST147, ST323, ST258, ST3035, and ST340) [15] or the blaNDM-1/blaKPC-3 but belonged to the ST512 type and not the ST39 [16]. More than two genes were detected among isolates in a study conducted in Russia [3], in which four ST39 CRKP strains were found to express three carbapenemase genes simultaneously, blaKPC-2/blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48.
Two isolates (#17 and 22) in the present study belonged to type ST258 and harboured the single gene blaKPC-3 and the gene combination blaKPC-3/blaOXA-48, respectively. CRKP-DC strains of the ST258 type have been identified in Larissa, Greece [15], where simultaneous expressions of blaKPC and blaVIM genes were observed, although there were also ST258 strains in which only the blaKPC gene was detected, as was the case in our study. The presence of two carbapenemases in ST258 K. pneumoniae was observed also in one isolate carried blaKPC-2 and blaVIM-4 in a New York City Hospital [17].
In that respect, to our knowledge, the situation in our hospital was unique compared to other Greek settings, as the clonal spread of the ST11 CRKP-DC isolates dominated the outbreak within the ICU and presented a novel epidemiological situation that needed continuous monitoring. The clonal spread of the ST11 CRKP-DC isolates begun in October 2022 and continued up to January 2023, and then it was replaced by the clonal spread of the ST39 CRKP-DC isolates up to April 2023, when this outbreak was finally eliminated as a result of the corrective measures that were implemented.
The majority of the isolates were resistant and/or highly resistant to the antimicrobial meropenem-vaborbactam. Among ST11 isolates there were a few susceptible ones, although no differences regarding the resistome analysis were detected between the susceptible and the resistant ST11 isolates. Of interest, however, is that the isolates that were considered susceptible to this antimicrobial agent were presented with elevated MIC values of 4 or 8 mg/L, just below the EUCAST breakpoint of ≥16 mg/L. This particular result may indicate a shift to higher MICs and possible resistance to this antimicrobial combination if it is used extensively in a potential endemic carbapenemase setting and should be further monitored.
It is also of interest that according to the resistome analysis, differences were detected between the Group A/ST11 and the Group B/ST39 isolates regarding other beta-lactamase genes. Isolates of Group B harboured a considerably higher number of beta-lactamase genes, than the Group A ones. Nevertheless, these differences did not correspond to phenotypic differences among the isolates; all strains from both groups were fully resistant to all beta-lactam antibiotics, with the sole sporadic exception being the few meropenem-vaborbactam marginally susceptible isolates among the Group A/ST11. This particular result is presented for the first time in Greece.
Regarding the isolate #17, of interest is the inconsistent lateral flow assay result (OXA-48/KPC/NDM) with the sequencing results (only the blaKPC-3 gene was identified). Although this assay is considered a robust, sensitive, and specific one [18], there is at least one study [19] reporting CRKP isolates as falsely positive for the NDM and/or OXA-48 enzymes, as was also the case in this study. The authors were speculating that this occurred probably due to the high concentration of the suspension, as pointed out also in the assay insert. We repeated the assay with various inoculum concentrations and in our hands the assay provided the same result (three carbapenemases). In that respect we believe that this is a rare but possible false positive result of the technique and should be considered in future applications. If more similar false positive results do occur, especially among potential CRKP-DC isolates, further investigation would be warranted.
It should be noted that although all three STs detected in this study do not belong in the group of MLST types associated with the hypervirulent group of isolates (mostly ST23, ST65 and ST86, as well as ST101 and ST147) it has been shown that hypervirulent isolates often acquire carbapenemase genes [8]; thus, in a nosocomial environment abundant in carbapenemases (like in many Greek hospitals) the introduction of a hypervirulent susceptible clone may potentially result in a CPKP hypervirulent outbreak.
A limitation of our study was that it was an investigation of an outbreak of CPKP-DC isolates, without paired detailed clinical data (only a limited set of data related to the bacterial isolates were studied). Nevertheless, the important clinical perspective lies in the identification of the underlying resistance mechanisms that are circulating in an ICU, not just on the antibiotic group level (e.g., carbapenem resistance) but on the resistome scale (older and novel beta-lactams including inhibitor combinations, aminoglycoside, tetracycline, quinolone groups), thus globally mapping resistance with a view to aiding clinical decisions.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, although previously CRKP-DC isolates have been detected in Greece, the present study reported an outbreak mainly due to ST11 CRKP-DC isolates harbouring the combination blaNDM-1/blaOXA-48 which is a novel situation in our country and should be further monitored.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P. and S.D.; collection of the isolates, identification and antimicrobial testing, D.T.-P.; collection and analysis of the clinical data, G.S., S.H., S.D., T.C. and O.K.; Genetic experiments and analysis, O.K.; supervision of the sequencing experiments, S.V. and S.P.; drafting the manuscript, J.P. and O.K.; review and editing the manuscript, J.P., D.T.-P., O.K., G.S., S.D., T.C., S.H., S.V. and S.P.; project administration, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by grants #767 of Onassis Hospital and #18422 of the Special Account of Research Grants of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific and Ethics Committee of Onassis Hospital (protocol code 767, approved on 10 May 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived, because it was a retrospective study in which the samples were collected for diagnostic purposes independently of the study, and the data were provided to us anonymously.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30509924.v1 (accessed on 2 November 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CRKPCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
STSequence type
blaBeta-lactamase gene
ICUIntensive Care Unit
MALDIMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
MICMinimum Inhibitory Concentration
MLSTMulti Locus Sequence Typing
cgMLSTCore Genome Multi Locus Sequence Typing
NDMNew Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase
OXAOxacillinase beta-lactamase
KPCKlebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase
VIMVerona integron-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase
IMPActive-on-imipenem carbapenemase

References

  1. Protonotariou, E.; Meletis, G.; Chatzopoulou, F.; Malousi, A.; Chatzidimitriou, D.; Skoura, L. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 co-producing NDM-1 and OXA-48 carbapenemases in Greece. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2019, 19, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Podschun, R.; Ullmann, U. Klebsiella spp. as nosocomial pathogens: Epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kuzina, E.S.; Kislichkina, A.A.; Sizova, A.A.; Skryabin, Y.P.; Novikova, T.S.; Ershova, O.N.; Savin, I.A.; Khokhlova, O.E.; Bogun, A.G.; Fursova, N.K. High-molecular-weight plasmids carrying carbapenemase genes BlaNDM-1, BlaKPC-2, and BlaOXA-48 coexisting in clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae strains of ST39. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Karampatakis, T.; Antachopoulos, C.; Iosifidis, E.; Tsakris, A.; Roilides, E. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Greece. Future Microbiol. 2016, 11, 809–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bonnin, R.A.; Jousset, A.B.; Chiarelli, A.; Emeraud, C.; Glaser, P.; Naas, T.; Dortet, L. Emergence of new non-clonal group 258 high-risk clones among carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gao, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, Q.; Jin, L.; Wang, H. The transferability and evolution of NDM-1 and KPC-2 co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical settings. eBioMedicine 2020, 51, 102599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Giakkoupi, P.; Pappa, O.; Polemis, M.; Vatopoulos, A.C.; Miriagou, V.; Zioga, A.; Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Tzouvelekis, L.S. Emerging Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates co-producing KPC-2 and VIM-1 carbapenemases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4048–4050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hetta, H.F.; Alanazi, F.E.; Sayed Ali, M.A.; Alatawi, A.D.; Aljohani, H.M.; Ahmed, R.; Alansari, N.A.; Alkhathami, F.M.; Albogmi, A.; Alharbi, B.M.; et al. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: Insights into virulence, antibiotic resistance, and fight strategies against a superbug. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lorenzina, G.; Gonaa, F.; Battagliaa, S.; Spitaleri, A.; Saluzzoa, F.; Trovatoa, A.; Di Marco, F.; Cichero, P.; Biancardi, A.; Nizzero, P.; et al. Detection of NDM-1/5 and OXA-48 co-producing extensively drug-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in Northern Italy. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Res. 2022, 48, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Outbreak of Carbapenemase-Producing (NDM-1 and OXA-48) and Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST307, North-East Germany, 2019; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2019; Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/outbreak-Klebsiella-pneumoniae-Germany (accessed on 25 October 2025).
  11. Solgi, H.; Shahcheraghi, F.; Bolourchi, N.; Ahmadi, A. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant serotype K1 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 harbouring blaNDM-1 and blaOXA-48 carbapenemases in Iran. Microb. Pathogen. 2020, 149, 104507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Karampatakis, T.; Zarras, C.; Pappa, S.; Vagdatli, E.; Iosifidis, E.; Roilides, E.; Papa, A. Emergence of ST39 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae producing VIM-1 and KPC-2. Microb. Pathogen. 2022, 162, 105373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tryfinopoulou, K.; Linkevicius, M.; Pappa, O.; Alm, E.; Karadimas, K.; Svartström, O.; Polemis, M.; Mellou, K.; Maragkos, A.; Brolund, A.; et al. Emergence and persistent spread of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae high-risk clones in Greek hospitals, 2013 to 2022. Eurosurveillance 2023, 28, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rigatou, A.; Afolayan, A.O.; Tatsi, E.B.; Deliolanis, I.; Michos, A.; Reuter, S.; Daikos, G.L. Double carbapenemases in Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates: Dissemination in a single medical center via multiple plasmids and a variety of highly efficient clones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2025, 69, e0146224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tsilipounidaki, K.; Athanasakopoulou, Z.; Müller, E.; Burgold-Voigt, S.; Florou, Z.; Braun, S.D.; Monecke, S.; Gatselis, N.K.; Zachou, K.; Stefos, A.; et al. Plethora of resistance genes in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in Greece: No end to a continuous genetic evolution. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chatzidimitriou, M.; Voulgaridis, A.; Tsolakidou, P.; Chatzopoulou, F.; Chonianakis, I.; Vagdatli, E.; Kachrimanidou, M.; Vyzantiadis, T.A. Significant prevalence of dual KPC/NDM carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an ICU cohort in Thessaloniki (2023), including an ST512 isolate co-harboring bla(NDM-1) and bla(KPC-3). Antibiotics 2025, 14, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Castanheira, M.; Deshpande, L.M.; Mills, J.C.; Jones, R.N.; Soave, R.; Jenkins, S.G.; Schuetz, A.N. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from a New York city hospital belonging to sequence type 258 and carrying blaKPC-2 and blaVIM-4. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 1924–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. García-Fernández, A.; Villa, L.; Carta, C.; Venditti, C.; Giordano, A.; Venditti, M.; Mancini, C.; Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 producing KPC-3 identified in Italy carries novel plasmids and OmpK36/OmpK35 porin variants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2143–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, C.H.; Cao, H.; Jiang, S.; Wong, T.T.Y.; Tse, C.W.S.; Ho, P.L. Inoculum size and false-positive detection of NDM- and OXA-48-type carbapenemases using two multiplex lateral flow assays. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of all 23 K. pneumoniae isolates.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of all 23 K. pneumoniae isolates.
Microorganisms 13 02781 g001
Table 1. Sample Information and immunochromatography results of the 23 K. pneumoniae isolates.
Table 1. Sample Information and immunochromatography results of the 23 K. pneumoniae isolates.
No.Specimen TypeDateCarbapenem-Resistant Mechanism (by Immunochromatography)
1Blood31 October 2022OXA48—NDM
2Bronchial secretions25 October 2022OXA48—NDM
3Blood20 October 2022OXA48—NDM
4Urine2 November 2022OXA48—NDM
5Blood5 November 2022OXA48—NDM
6Bronchial secretions20 October 2022OXA48—NDM
7Bronchial secretions20 October 2022OXA48—NDM
8Catheter tip9 October 2022OXA48—NDM
9Sputum9 November 2022OXA48—NDM
10Urine14 November 2022OXA48—NDM
11Urine17 November 2022OXA48—NDM
12Bronchial secretions24 November 2022OXA48—NDM
13Purulent wound exudates12 January 2023OXA48—NDM
14Purulent wound exudates18 January 2023OXA48—NDM
15Bronchial secretions25 January 2023OXA48—NDM
16Purulent wound exudates25 January 2023KPC—NDM
17Bronchial secretions30 January 2023OXA48—KPC—NDM
18Nasal swabs1 February 2023OXA48—NDM
19Bronchial secretions6 February 2023KPC—NDM
20Blood8 February 2023KPC—NDM
21Blood8 February 2023OXA48—NDM
22Bronchial secretions15 March 2023OXA48—KPC
23Purulent wound exudates5 April 2023KPC—NDM
Table 2. Antibiotic susceptibility testing results.
Table 2. Antibiotic susceptibility testing results.
Νο.AMCANATMClCAZCFMCIPCROCSCTXCXMETPFEPFOSGMIPMLEVMEMMNOMXFSXTTEMTGCTMTZPCTCZAIMRMEV
1≥3216≥64≤2≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥164≥8≥320≥32≤0.5≥16≥128≥32≥16>328
2≥3216≥644≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥3232≥16≥16≥8≥168≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>3216
3≥3216≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥32≥8≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
4≥3216≥644≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>324
5≥3216≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥324≥16≥128≥32≥16>324
6≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥324≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
7≥3232≥644≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
8≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥324≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
9≥3232≥64≤2≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
10≥3216≥644≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥168≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>324
11≥3216≥6416≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
12≥3232≥644≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
13≥3216≥6416≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>328
14≥3232≥6416≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥168≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>328
15≥3232≥648≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
16≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥32≥163232
17≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32128≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥32≥160.51
18 ≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
19≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥324≥16≥128≥32≥16>3232
20≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥32≥16>3232
21≥3216≥6416≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥168≥8≥320≥321≥16≥128≥32≥16>32>256
22≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≥16≥64≥64≥8≥32128≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥322≥16≥128≥324432
23≥3232≥64≥64≥64≥4≥4≥64≤0.5≥64≥64≥8≥32≥256≥16≥16≥8≥16≥16≥8≥320≥324≥16≥128≥32≥16>3232
AMC: Amoxicillin/Clavulanate, AN: Amikacin, ATM: Aztreonam, Cl: Chloramphenicol, CAZ: Ceftazidime, CFM: Cefixime, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, CRO: Ceftriaxone, CS: Colistin, CTX: Cefotaxime, CXM: Cefuroxime, ETP: Ertapenem, FEP: Cefepime, FOS: Fosfomycin, GM: Gentamicin, IPM: Imipenem, LEV: Levofloxacin, MEM: Meropenem, MNO: Minocycline, MXF: Moxifloxacin, SXT: Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole, TEM: Temocillin, TGC: Tigecycline, TM: Tobramycin, TZP: Piperacillin/Tazobactam, CT: Ceftolozane/Tazobactam, CZA: Ceftazidime/Avibactam, IMR: Imipenem/Relebactam, MEV: Meropenem/Vaborbactam.
Table 3. MLST analysis results.
Table 3. MLST analysis results.
No.% IdentitySTgapAinfBmdhpgiphoErpoBtonBMain Clonal Group
1 100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
2100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
3100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
4100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
5100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
6100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
7100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
8100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
9100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
10100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
11100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
12100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
13100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
14100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
15100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
16100%ST39gapA_2infB_1mdh_2pgi_4phoE_9rpoB_1tonB_14CG10011
17100%ST258gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_79CG10011
18100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
19100%ST39gapA_2infB_1mdh_2pgi_4phoE_9rpoB_1tonB_14CG10011
20100%ST39gapA_2infB_1mdh_2pgi_4phoE_9rpoB_1tonB_14CG10011
21100%ST11gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_4CG10011
22100%ST258gapA_3infB_3mdh_1pgi_1phoE_1rpoB_1tonB_79CG10011
23100%ST39gapA_2infB_1mdh_2pgi_4phoE_9rpoB_1tonB_14CG10011
Table 4. Resistome analysis of the isolates. Blank squares correspond to absence of the respective gene.
Table 4. Resistome analysis of the isolates. Blank squares correspond to absence of the respective gene.
Antibiotic Class1234567891011121314151617181920212223
ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST11ST39ST258ST11ST39ST39ST11ST258ST39
β-LactamsblaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1 blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1blaNDM-1 blaNDM-1
               blaKPC-2  blaKPC-2blaKPC-2  blaKPC-2
                blaKPC-3    blaKPC-3 
blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48blaOXA-48  blaOXA-48  blaOXA-48blaOXA-48 
blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1 blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1 blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1blaOXA-1  blaOXA-1  blaOXA-1  
blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182blaSHV-182 blaSHV-182blaSHV-182  blaSHV-182blaSHV-182 
               blaSHV-79  blaSHV-79blaSHV-79  blaSHV-79
               blaSHV-89  blaSHV-89blaSHV-89  blaSHV-89
               blaSHV-40  blaSHV-40blaSHV-40  blaSHV-40
               blaSHV-85  blaSHV-85blaSHV-85  blaSHV-85
               blaSHV-56  blaSHV-56blaSHV-56  blaSHV-56
blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15 blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15blaCTX-M-15 blaCTX-M-15
blaTEM-1BblaTEM-1B blaTEM-1B blaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1B blaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1B blaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1BblaTEM-1B blaTEM-1B
               blaTEM-207  blaTEM-207blaTEM-207  blaTEM-207
               blaTEM-230  blaTEM-230blaTEM-230  blaTEM-230
               blaTEM-104  blaTEM-104blaTEM-104  blaTEM-104
               blaTEM-234  blaTEM-234blaTEM-234  blaTEM-234
               blaTEM-217  blaTEM-217blaTEM-217  blaTEM-217
               blaTEM-30  blaTEM-30blaTEM-30  blaTEM-30
               blaTEM-198  blaTEM-198blaTEM-198  blaTEM-198
Aminoglycosidesaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIaaac(3)-IIa  aac(3)-IIa  aac(3)-IIa  
               aac(3)-IId  aac(3)-IIdaac(3)-IId  aac(3)-IId
  aac(6′)-Ib       aac(6′)-Ib  aac(6′)-Ib aac(6′)-Ib aac(6′)-Ibaac(6′)-Ibaac(6′)-Ibaac(6′)-Ibaac(6′)-Ibaac(6′)-Ib
               aph(3′)-Iaaph(3′)-Ia aph(3′)-Iaaph(3′)-Ia aph(3′)-Iaaph(3′)-Ia
aph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ib aph(3′′)-Ib aph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ib aph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ib aph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ibaph(3′′)-Ib  
aph(6)-Idaph(6)-Id aph(6)-Id aph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Id aph(6)-Idaph(6)-Id aph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Id aph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Idaph(6)-Id  
               aadA1  aadA1aadA1  aadA1
               aadA2  aadA2aadA2  aadA2
AmphenicolscatB3catB3catB3 catB3catB3catB3catB3catB3 catB3catB3catB3catB3catB3  catB3  catB3  
                catA1      
Tetracyclines               tet(M)  tet(M)tet(M)  tet(M)
Macrolides               mph(A)mph(A) mph(A)mph(A)  mph(A)
Quaternary ammonium compound               qacL  qacLqacL  qacL
               qacEqacE qacEqacE  qacE
FosfomycinfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosAfosA
QuinolonesOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxAOqxA
OqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxBOqxB
Folate pathway antagonists               sul1sul1 sul1sul1  sul1
sul2sul2 sul2 sul2sul2sul2sul2sul2 sul2sul2sul2sul2sul2 sul2 sul2sul2  
               sul3  sul3sul3  sul3
dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14dfrA14  dfrA14 dfrA14dfrA14  
               dfrA12dfrA12 dfrA12dfrA12  dfrA12
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koutsopetra, O.; Vourli, S.; Stravopodis, G.; Hatzianastasiou, S.; Dimopoulos, S.; Chamogeorgakis, T.; Tassi-Papatheou, D.; Pournaras, S.; Papaparaskevas, J. An ICU Outbreak Due to Two Populations of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to ST11 and ST39 Types, Harbouring Double Carbapenemase Genes. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122781

AMA Style

Koutsopetra O, Vourli S, Stravopodis G, Hatzianastasiou S, Dimopoulos S, Chamogeorgakis T, Tassi-Papatheou D, Pournaras S, Papaparaskevas J. An ICU Outbreak Due to Two Populations of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to ST11 and ST39 Types, Harbouring Double Carbapenemase Genes. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(12):2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koutsopetra, Olga, Sophia Vourli, Georgios Stravopodis, Sophia Hatzianastasiou, Stavros Dimopoulos, Themistocles Chamogeorgakis, Despina Tassi-Papatheou, Spyros Pournaras, and Joseph Papaparaskevas. 2025. "An ICU Outbreak Due to Two Populations of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to ST11 and ST39 Types, Harbouring Double Carbapenemase Genes" Microorganisms 13, no. 12: 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122781

APA Style

Koutsopetra, O., Vourli, S., Stravopodis, G., Hatzianastasiou, S., Dimopoulos, S., Chamogeorgakis, T., Tassi-Papatheou, D., Pournaras, S., & Papaparaskevas, J. (2025). An ICU Outbreak Due to Two Populations of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Belonging to ST11 and ST39 Types, Harbouring Double Carbapenemase Genes. Microorganisms, 13(12), 2781. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop