Next Article in Journal
The Gastric Microbiome Communities and Endoscopic Mucosal Morphologies Associated with Premalignant Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Interactions Between Natural Phenolic Compounds and Antibiotics Against Multidrug-Resistant K. pneumoniae: A Pooled Analysis of 216 In Vitro Tests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conserved and Specific Root-Associated Microbiome Reveals Close Correlation Between Fungal Community and Growth Traits of Multiple Chinese Fir Genotypes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov., a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Isolated from the Halophyte Suaeda japonica

Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul, Goyang 10326, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2025, 13(11), 2498; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112498
Submission received: 2 October 2025 / Revised: 21 October 2025 / Accepted: 28 October 2025 / Published: 30 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rhizosphere Microbial Community, 4th Edition)

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain was isolated from the roots of Suaeda japonica, a halophytic plant inhabiting tidal zones. Phylogenetic, genomic, and phenotypic analyses identified the isolate as a novel species within the genus Paraburkholderia, for which the name Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov. is proposed. The strain exhibits multiple plant growth-promoting traits, including the production of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, indole-3-acetic acid, and siderophore, along with the ability to fix nitrogen and solubilize phosphate. Genomic analysis revealed genes associated with enhanced root surface adhesion and rhizosphere survival, such as those involved in thiamine biosynthesis and transport, and biofilm formation via poly-β-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (PGA) synthesis. These features suggest the strain’s potential for persistent colonization and beneficial interaction with host plants. Although its direct impact on plant growth has not yet been experimentally validated, the genetic and biochemical evidence supports its potential application in agriculture. The objective of this study was to conduct a polyphasic taxonomic characterization of a novel strain DGU8T isolated from the roots of the halophyte Suaeda japonica, and to assess its potential as a plant growth-promoting agent, particularly its tolerance to drought-related osmotic stress.

1. Introduction

Climate change has led to an increase in the frequency and severity of natural disasters, particularly drought, posing significant challenges to global agriculture [1]. As climate change accelerates, crops will be increasingly exposed to water scarcity, making the development of drought-resistant plants a priority [2]. One promising approach to enhance drought tolerance involves inoculating crops with beneficial microbial strains, which can strengthen plant resilience under water-limited conditions [3]. To explore such microbial adaptations, we conducted studies in extreme environments such as intertidal zone ecosystems characterized by fluctuating salinity and periodic inundation. These harsh conditions support only highly adaptable plant species, such as Suaeda japonica (Chenopodiaceae) [4]. Suaeda japonica is an annual halophyte native to the Yellow Sea region of Republic of Korea and Kyushu, Japan. It thrives in saline-affected tidal flats and typically grows to a height of 20–50 cm [5]. Tidal flats formed by alternating low and high tides are ecologically valuable zones that contribute to nutrient cycling and ecosystem restoration [6,7,8]. S. japonica has attracted scientific interest due to its diverse biological activities. Its underground parts exhibit antioxidant and reducing properties, and its extracts have been used to synthesize zinc oxide nanoparticles with photocatalytic and antibacterial effects [9,10]. Additionally, its bioactive compounds have demonstrated anti-obesity effects in murine models [11].
Given this ecological and biochemical significance, our study aimed to isolate novel microbial strains from the rhizosphere of S. japonica and evaluate their plant growth-promoting potential. Some genera have been isolated from tidal flat sediments, the natural habitat of the halophyte S. japonica. However, research targeting the specific microbial communities within this plant’s rhizosphere remains limited. Among the microorganisms adapted to such high-salinity environments, the genera Marinobacter and Wenyingzhuangia are well-documented [12]. In contrast, there are no existing reports on the isolation of the genus Paraburkholderia from the rhizosphere of S. japonica or, more broadly, from any halophyte in a tidal flat ecosystem.
According to the LPSN database (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/paraburkholderia; accessed on 27 October 2025), Sawana et al. reclassified Paraburkholderia as an independent genus distinct from Burkholderia, designating Paraburkholderia graminis as the type species [13]. Members of this genus are predominantly isolated from soil, plant roots, and root-associated environments [14,15,16,17]. Of the 139 recorded species, 96 have been validly published to date [18]. Paraburkholderia species are Gram-negative, straight or slightly curved rod-shaped bacteria that are generally aerobic and motile via one or more polar flagella [19]. Most species possess relatively large genomes ranging from 7.0 to 10.0 Mb, with DNA G + C content between 58.9 and 65.0 mol%. Their major fatty acids include C16:0, C17:0 cyclo, C19:0 cyclo ω8c, and summed feature 8 (C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c) [19,20], while the dominant polar lipids are phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, and diphosphatidylglycerol. Several Paraburkholderia strains have demonstrated plant growth-promoting capabilities. For instance, Paraburkholderia sp. GD17 and Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJNT have shown beneficial effects on crops such as Chinese cabbage, wheat, corn, and grapevines [21,22]. Similarly, Paraburkholderia sp. Msb3 and Paraburkholderia tagetis RG36T have been reported to enhance tomato growth [23,24]. These findings underscore the genus’s long-standing relevance in growth promotion research. The first objective of this study was to isolate and taxonomically characterize a novel bacterial strain from the rhizosphere of the halophyte S. japonica using a multifaceted genomic, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic analysis. The second objective was to evaluate the strain’s potential as a plant growth promoter through genomic analysis and in vitro experiments, focusing on its ability to withstand drought-induced osmotic stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation of Rhizosphere Bacteria

S. japonica samples were collected from a natural colony located at 37°40′28.6″ N, 126°22′35.2″ E on Seongmodo Island, Republic of Korea. Ten individual plants were randomly selected at 30 m intervals within the sampling area. Using sterile scissors, root segments were excised and placed into 50 mL conical tubes. Samples were stored in an ice-filled cooler during the 1 h transport.
Upon arrival, roots were rinsed with sterile distilled water to remove surface debris, gently washed with sterile 0.1% Tween 20 for 30 s, and rinsed twice with sterile distilled water. Surface sterilization was performed using 95% ethanol (Duksan, Ansan-Si, Republic of Korea) for 5 min, followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite (Duksan, Republic of Korea) for 5 min, and two final rinses with sterile distilled water [12].
Sterilized root samples were placed in 10 mL of sterile 0.85% (w/v) saline solution in 50 mL conical tubes, rotated at 180 rpm for 1 h on a rotary shaker, and vortexed for 10 min. Finally, 100 μL aliquots from 10-fold serial dilutions (10−1, 10−2, and 10−3) were spread onto Marine Agar 2216 (MA; Difco, France) and Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A; MB cell, Seoul, Republic of Korea), followed by incubation at 30 °C for 4 days.

2.2. 16S rRNA Amplification and Phylogenetic Analysis

The novel strain DGU8T was sequenced using the universal bacterial primer set 27F/1492R by Solgent Co., Ltd. (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Sequence assembly and analysis were performed using SeqMan software (version 5.0; DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA; https://www.dnastar.com/software/lasergene/) [25] and Chromas (version 2.6.6; Technelysium Pty., Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia. https://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas/) following established protocols.
The complete 16S rRNA sequence of DGU8T was submitted to the EzbioCloud database (CJ Bioscience, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea; http://ezbiocloud.net; accessed on 8 April 2024) for species identification and comparison with closely related strains [26]. The sequence was also deposited in the NCBI GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/; accessed on 20 April 2024) and assigned a GenBank number.
Gene sequences of 19 reference strains were obtained from EzBioCloud for comparative analysis. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood [27], neighbor-joining [28], and maximum parsimony [29] algorithms in MEGA X software (Molecular Evolution Genetics Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA; https://www.megasoftware.net/; accessed on 1 October 2025) [30]. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the Kimura-2-parameter model [31], and bootstrap values were derived from 1000 replicates. Escherichia coli X80725T (ATCC11775) was used as the outgroup.

2.3. Genome Features and Comparative Analysis

Genomic DNA of the novel strain DGU8T cultured on R2A agar at 30 °C for 4 days, was extracted by Macrogen Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) using a TruSeq DNA PCR-Free kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Whole-genome shotgun libraries were prepared and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq X platform. The draft genome was assembled de novo using the SPAdes genome assembler (version 3.15.0) [32], and its completeness was assessed using BUSCO software (version 5.1.3) [33].
Functional annotation and gene prediction were performed using Prokka (version 1.14.6) [34] and BLAST (version 2.17.0) [35] to identify contigs, coding sequences, and genes for tRNA, rRNA, and tmRNA. Plant growth-promoting genes including those involved in phosphate solubilization, nitrogen fixation, pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) biosynthesis, indole-3-acetic acid production, and siderophore synthesis [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] were identified by comparing Prokka results with the Evolutionary Genealogy of Genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups (EggNOG) database (version 4.5) [45].
Genome completeness and contamination were further evaluated using CheckM2 (version 1.1.0; https://github.com/chklovski/CheckM2) [46]. The annotated genome was submitted to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (version 6.5; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok) to obtain an accession number [35].
Phylogenetic classification of the novel strain was performed by comparing its genome with those of 96 validly published species of the genus Paraburkholderia registered in the NCBI database. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Up-to-date Bacterial Core Genes 2 (UBCG2; version 2.0; http://leb.snu.ac.kr/ubcg2), which includes 3508 species and 81 single-copy bacterial core genes [47]. The resulting 97 Paraburkholderia species were further analyzed using average amino acid identity (AAI) via the ezAAI tool in EzbioCloud (https://endixk.github.io/ezaai/; accessed on 21 June 2024) [48].
Protein-coding genes were annotated using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (https://rast.nmpdr.org/; accessed on 24 June 2024) [49,50,51]. Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters were predicted using antiSMASH (version 7.0; https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/) [52].
Taxonomic relatedness to closely related strains was assessed using average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH). ANI was calculated using the Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity Tool (OAT; https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/orthoani; accessed on 24 August 2024) [53], and dDDH values were obtained using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) (version 3.0; http://ggdc.dsmz.de/ggdc.php#) [54].
Genomes of DGU8T and reference strains that clustered within the same clade (based on UBCG analysis) were visualized using the Anvi’o pan-genome workflow (version 8.0). Pan-genome analysis was performed using the presence–absence algorithm (D: Euclidean; L: Ward), identifying singletons, core genes, and single-copy gene clusters (SCGs) [55,56]. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs (KOs) were assigned using KofamScan (https://github.com/takaram/kofam_scan; accessed on 1 September 2024) [57], and KEGG Decoder (version 1.3.0; https://github.com/bjtully/BioData/tree/master/KEGGDecoder) was used to map KOs to metabolic pathways and generate heatmaps. KEGG annotations with E-values exceeding 1 × 10−5 were excluded from the analysis [58].

2.4. Morphology and Chemotaxonomic Characteristics

Strain DGU8T was cultured at 30 °C for 4 days in R2A, tryptone soy agar (TSA; Difco, Eybens, France), Luria–Bertani agar (LB agar; Difco, Eybens, France), nutrient agar (NA; Difco, Eybens, France), and MA to determine the optimal growth medium. For phenotypic comparison, strain DGU8T and 5 reference strains were each inoculated onto optimum agar and cultured at 30 °C for 3 days. Subsequent experiments were conducted in R2A broth (MB cell; Republic of Korea), incubated at 30 °C for 4 days with shaking at 180 rpm.
Temperature tolerance was assessed by incubating the strain on R2A agar plate and incubated for 4 days at various temperatures (at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 37, and 40 °C) to determine its temperature growth range. NaCl tolerance was evaluated by culturing in R2A broth supplemented with 0–3.0% (w/v) NaCl at 1.0% intervals. pH tolerance was assessed by incubating in R2A broth adjusted to pH values ranging from 3.0 to 12.0, in 1.0-unit increments, for 4 days. Buffers used included citric acid (pH 3.0–5.0), sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 5.0), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0–8.0), Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (pH 9.0–10.0), and Na2HPO4–NaOH (pH 11.0–12.0), each at a final concentration of 50 mM [59].
Drought resistance was assessed by culturing strain DGU8T in R2A broth supplemented with various concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 6000 (0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20%, w/v; Steinheim, Germany). A 20 µL aliquot of a pre-culture was inoculated into 2 mL of each medium and incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. Bacterial growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using a spectrophotometer (Multiskan GO, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and compared to a negative control.
Cell growth was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm using spectrophotometer (Multiskan GO, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Physiological and enzymatic characteristics were analyzed using the API 20NE kit (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Anaerobic growth was assessed by incubating R2A agar plates in BBL GasPak anaerobic culture vessels at 30 °C for 14 days.
Hydrolytic enzyme activity was assessed by supplementing R2A agar plates with 1% of the following substrates: casein (1% skim milk; BioPure, USA), chitin (1%; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), carboxymethyl-cellulose (CM-cellulose; 1%; Duksan Co., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), starch (1%; Sigma-Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Tween 20 (1%; BioPure, Woodinville, WA, USA), and Tween 80 (1%; BioPure, Woodinville, WA, USA). Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 7 days, and enzyme activity was evaluated as previously described [60].
Cells cultured on R2A agar for 4 days were stained with 1% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid and examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe morphology and motility. Oxidase activity was determined by the appearance of a purple coloration upon application of 1% tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). Catalase activity was confirmed based on bubble formation following the addition of a 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution. Gram staining was performed according to a previously described method [61].
For fatty acid analysis, cells were harvested from R2A agar plates after 7 days of incubation at 30 °C. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted using the MIDI Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIS; version 6.01, database TSBA6; MIDI Inc., Newark, DE, USA) following saponification, methylation, and solvent extraction as described by Kuykendall et al. [62]. Fatty acids accounting for ≥10.0% of the total content were classified as major, while those present at <1.0% were designated as trace (TR). Quinones were extracted using a chloroform/methanol mixture (2:1, v/v) and analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography following the method of Minnikin et al. [63].

2.5. Functional Traits Related to Plant Growth Promotion

To assess 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity, a pre-culture of strain DGU8T was inoculated into Dworkin–Foster (DF) minimal salt medium supplemented with 0.3 mM ACC [64] and incubated at 30 °C for 4 days. ACC deaminase catalyzes the degradation of ACC, a precursor of ethylene, and its activity was confirmed based on growth in the ACC-containing medium.
Nitrogen fixation ability was evaluated using Jensen’s medium, which contained sucrose (20.0 g/L), K2HPO4 (1.0 g/L), MgSO4 (0.5 g/L), CaCO3 (2.0 g/L), NaCl (0.5 g/L), Na2MoO4 (0.005 g/L), FeSO4 (0.1 g/L), and agar (15.0 g/L). Nitrogen-fixing ability was indicated by colony formation accompanied by a yellow halo.
Phosphate solubilization was assessed using Pikovskaya (PVK) medium composed of yeast extract (0.5 g/L), dextrose (10.0 g/L), Ca3(PO4)2 (5.0 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (0.5 g/L), KCl (0.2 g/L), MgSO4 (0.1 g/L), MnSO4 (0.0001 g/L), FeSO4 (0.0001 g/L), and agar (15.0 g/L). The ability to solubilize phosphate was confirmed by the formation of a clear zone around the inoculated strain.
Siderophore production was assessed using universal chrome azurol S (CAS) agar, prepared according to a previously described method [65]. The presence of an orange halo and clear zone around the colonies indicated siderophore production.
Auxin production was assessed using a colorimetric method involving the supernatant of bacterial cultures grown in R2A broth supplemented with varying concentrations of L-Tryptophan (0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.0313, and 0%; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) [66]. Cultures were incubated at 30 °C and 180 rpm for 3 days. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, 1 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 2 mL of Salkowski reagent (98 mL of 35% perchloric acid and 2 mL of 0.5 M FeCl3), and the mixture was incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 30 min [67]. The absorbance of the resulting red solution was measured at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Multiskan GO, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) concentrations were calculated using a standard curve. For each measurement, the absorbance value of a corresponding blank sample (R2A broth with the same L-tryptophan concentration but without bacterial inoculation) was subtracted to correct for any non-biological color development.
Strain DGU8T was inoculated into media formulated for assessing plant growth-promoting traits and incubated at 30 °C for 7 days.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation of Rhizosphere Bacteria

After 4 days of cultivation, colonies with diverse morphologies and pigmentation were observed. Pure isolation was achieved through repeated subculturing. The isolated strain DGU8T formed circular, convex, ivory-colored colonies and was preserved at −80 °C in 25% (v/v) glycerol. The strain was designated DGU8T and deposited at the Korean Agricultural Culture Collection (KACC 23737T; Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Microbiology Division, Wanju, Republic of Korea) and the Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC 19126T; Khlong Nueng, Pathum Thani, Thailand).

3.2. 16S rRNA Amplification and Phylogenetic Analysis

The assembled 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain DGU8T registered in EzbioCloud, was 1464 bp in length and classified within the phylum Pseudomonadota, class Betaproteobacteria, order Burkholderiales, family Burkholderiaceae, and genus Paraburkholderia. Sequence similarity analysis using the EzbioCloud database (version 2025.04.21) revealed the highest similarity with Paraburkholderia rhynchosiae WSM3937T (98.35%), followed by Paraburkholderia panacihumi DCY115T (98.21%), Paraburkholderia fynbosensis WSM4178T (98.14%), P. panacisoli DCY113T (98.00%), and P. phytofirmans PsJNT (97.94%).
Phylogenetic analysis of 19 Paraburkholderia species using the NJ, ML, and MP algorithm based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain DGU8T clustered closely with P. fynbosensis WSM4178T, P. rhynchosiae WSM3937T, and Paraburkholderia lacunae S27T, confirming its clear inculsion within the genus Paraburkholderia (Figure 1). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain DGU8T was deposited in the NCBI database under accession number PP702909 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/PP702909).

3.3. Genome Features and Comparative Analysis

The draft genome of strain DGU8T was assembled at the scaffold level, yielding a total genome size of 8,214,678 bp. The assembly comprised 105 scaffolds and contigs, with both scaffold N50 and contig N50 values at 207,651 bp, and L50 values of 12 for each. The genome contained 4 rRNAs, 58 tRNAs, 7548 total genes, and 7482 protein-coding genes (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_040812055.1/; accessed on 22 July 2024). CheckM2 analysis indicated a genome completeness of 100.0% and contamination of 1.13%. Based on the completed draft genome, the G + C content of strain DGU8T was calculated to be 62.5%. Comparative genome statistics of 97 species Paraburkholderia using PGAP are presented in Figure 2 and Supplementary Excel S1.
Strain DGU8T was compared with 96 draft genomes of Paraburkholderia, based on 3508 species and 81 single-copy bacterial core genes. Paraburkholderia panacisoli DCY113T was identified as the closest clade, followed by Paraburkholderia ribeironis STM 7296T, Paraburkholderia ultramafica LMG 28614T, Paraburkholderia ginsengisoli FDAARGOS 1049T, and P. fynbosensis LMG 27177T (Figure 3). The AAI phylogenetic tree strongly corroborated the UBCG2 analysis, with the same strains forming a distinct clade (Figure S1), thereby validating the selection of reference strains.
Comparison of RAST subsystem features revealed that strain DGU8T exhibited superior counts in categories such as cell wall and capsule, motility and chemotaxis, phages, prophages, transposable elements, plasmids, and potassium metabolism. Detailed subsystem compositions are provided in Table S1. The antiSMASH analysis of strain DGU8T identified biosynthetic gene clusters for 3 terpenes, 1 hydrogen cyanide, 1 arylpolyene, 1 NRPS-like, 1 homoserine lactone, 1 terpene precursor, 1 redox cofactor, and 1 T1PKS (Table S2).
The dDDH values between strain DGU8T and reference strains mirrored the UBCG2 phylogenetic clade, with the top 5 matches belonging to the same clade. This indicates that the novel strain was genetically similar. The dDDH values were 38.0%, 32.7%, 31.6%, 31.1%, and 30.7% for P. panacisoli DCY113T, P. ultramafica LMG 28614T, P. ginsengosoli FDAARGOS 1049T, P. fynbosensis LMG 27177T, and P. ribeironis STM 7296T, respectively. The ANI values were 88.4%, 86.8%, 86.7%, 85.9%, and 85.5% for P. panacisoli DCY113T, P. ginsengosoli FDAARGOS 1049T, P. ultramafica LMG 28,614T, P. fynbosensis LMG 27,177T, and P. ribeironis STM 7296T, respectively. ANI and dDDH values for 88 Paraburkholderia species are visualized in the ANI/dDDH heatmap (Figure 4). A comprehensive comparison of ANI and dDDH values between the novel strain DGU8T and 88 Paraburkholderia species is presented in the attached Supplementary Excel S2.
The Anvi’o workflow was employed to validate the core genome and pan-genome structures of strain DGU8T and five reference strains. The resulting pan-genome comprised 15,378 gene clusters, including 3261 core genes and 8408 singletons (genes unique to individual genomes). The outer edge of the pan-genome visualization illustrates the number of genomes containing specific gene clusters, the number of genes within those clusters, and the maximum number of paralogs (navy color). It also includes data on geometric, functional, and combined homogeneity indices (green), as well as the distribution of single-copy gene clusters (brown). Layers below the ANI heatmap represent, from bottom to top: total genome length, GC content, genome completeness, redundancy, gene density (genes per kbp), number of singleton gene clusters, and total gene cluster count (Figure 5).
KEGG Decoder analysis revealed that strain DGU8T exhibited high predicted values for genes involved in thiamine biosynthesis, thiamine transport, and biofilm PGA synthesis (Figure 6). Thiamin (vitamin B1) functions as a cofactor for enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of IAA, a key plant growth regulator that also contributes to defense responses and overall plant development [68]. The presence of thiamin transporter genes suggests that strain DGU8T may interact with plants not only through thiamin biosynthesis but also via direct transfer pathways within the rhizosphere. Furthermore, genes associated with PGA-based biofilm synthesis provide a genetic basis for the potential to form biofilms, which could enhance adhesion and survival on root surfaces, thereby contributing to colonization and robust plant–microbe interactions [69,70]. Detailed proportions of EggNOG and KEGG annotations are presented in Figure S2. Based on the eggNOG functional annotation, genes associated with plant growth-promoting activities such as phosphate solubilization, pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) production, nitrogen fixation, IAA production, and siderophore production were identified and are provided in Table 1.

3.4. Morphology and Chemotaxonomic Characteristics

Strain DGU8T grew on both R2A and NA plates, with optimal growth observed on R2A agar. Strain DGU8T was observed as circular, convex, and ivory-colored on R2A agar. It was capable of growing within a temperature range of 15–37 °C, with an optimum at 30 °C. The strain tolerated NaCl concentrations in the range of 0–1.0% (w/v), with optimal growth at 0%. However, no growth was observed at or above 2.0% NaCl. Furthermore, it grew within a pH range of 4.0–11.0, but no growth was observed below pH 3.0 or above pH 12.0.
The drought resistance of strain DGU8T was evaluated under osmotic stress conditions simulated by PEG 6000. As shown in the results, the strain exhibited a clear tolerance to the tested stress levels. While the highest growth (OD600 ≈ 1.0) was observed in the control medium without PEG 6000, the strain maintained robust growth in the presence of 5% and 10% PEG 6000. Although growth was gradually inhibited in a dose-dependent manner, the strain still showed significant growth (OD600 ≈ 0.4) even at the highest concentration of 20% PEG 6000, confirming its potential to withstand severe drought stress (Figure 7).
The API 20 NE test indicated that strain DGU8T was positive for nitrate reduction (NO3 to NO2), esculin hydrolysis (ESC), β-galactosidase activity (PNPG), and maltose assimilation (MAL), demonstrating its ability to reduce nitrates, hydrolyze esculin, and utilize both PNPG and maltose as carbon sources. Weak growth was observed under anaerobic conditions. Enzymatic hydrolysis activity was weakly positive only for carboxymethyl-cellulose; all other reactions were negative. The physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain DGU8T compared to the reference Paraburholderia strains are detailed in Table 2.
TEM revealed that strain DGU8T was rod-shaped and possessed a single flagellum (Figure S3). Catalase activity was confirmed by the generation of oxygen bubbles, while oxidase activity was negative.
The major fatty acid of strain DGU8T was C16:0 (26.7%). Comparative fatty acid profiles with reference strains are detailed in Table S3. The predominant ubiquinone was Q-8.

3.5. Functional Traits Related to Plant Growth Promotion

Strain DGU8T was able to grow on DF agar plates supplemented with ACC as the sole carbon source, demonstrating functional ACC deaminase activity (Figure 8a). It also grew and formed yellow halos on Jensen’s medium, indicating nitrogen fixation capability, which contributes to increased soil nitrogen availability and alleviation of salt stress in plants (Figure 8b).
Phosphate solubilization a trait that enhances soil fertility and supports crop development was evidenced by the formation of a narrow transparent zone, indicating a weak positive reaction (Figure 8c). Siderophore production was confirmed by the appearance of a transparent orange zone, indicating the strain’s ability to promote iron uptake in plants through siderophore secretion (Figure 8d).
Auxins are key plant hormones involved in growth and development, with IAA being one of the most extensively studied. IAA is produced via L-tryptophan metabolism [71]. Strain DGU8T demonstrated IAA production in the presence of L-tryptophan, yielding 27.58 ± 0.63 μg/mL when 0.5% (w/v) L-tryptophan was added to the culture medium (Figure 8e), indicating its potential to promote plant growth.
In summary, strain DGU8T exhibits multiple plant growth-promoting traits, including ACC deaminase activity, nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and IAA biosynthesis. These functional characteristics highlight its potential to enhance soil fertility, crop productivity, and overall plant health.

4. Discussion

In this study, we aimed to characterize a novel bacterium from the unique environment of a halophyte rhizosphere and to investigate its potential as a plant growth-promoting agent under abiotic stress. Our first objective was successfully met through a polyphasic taxonomic approach. The comprehensive genomic analysis, integrating various methods, provided conclusive evidence that strain DGU8T represents a novel species within the Paraburkholderia genus. The UBCG2 phylogenetic tree clearly placed DGU8T in a distinct clade, and this taxonomic position was unequivocally supported by genome-wide metrics. The AAI, ANI, and dDDH values between DGU8T and its closest relatives, such as P. panacisoli and P. fynbosensis, were all well below the established thresholds for species delineation (95–96% for ANI and 70% for dDDH) [53,54]. The visualization of genomic architecture with Anvi’o further substantiated these findings, revealing a unique genomic profile for our isolate. It is the first strain of the genus Paraburkholderia known to date to be isolated from a halophyte.
In line with our second objective, we explored the strain’s functional potential using genome annotation tools. The EggNOG and KEGG analyses revealed a rich repertoire of genes associated with plant growth promotion. Complete pathways for synthesizing key PGP compounds like IAA were identified, along with genes involved in phosphate solubilization and nitrogen fixation, whose effects were validated through In Vitro experiments [38,72,73]. The presence of these genes provided a strong genetic basis for the strain’s potential to enhance plant nutrition and development. Furthermore, the genome contained genes for thiamin biosynthesis and transport, which are known to play a vital role in plant health, and genes for PGA-based biofilm synthesis, suggesting a potential for root colonization.
A key theme of our study, introduced in the introduction, was the potential of microbial inoculants to enhance drought tolerance in plants. Our initial genomic findings were strongly supported by new experimental evidence. The in vitro PGP assays confirmed the functions predicted by the genome analysis, demonstrating that strain DGU8T can produce significant amounts of IAA and solubilize phosphate. When we tested the strain’s resilience against drought-induced osmotic stress using PEG 6000, DGU8T exhibited remarkable tolerance, maintaining substantial growth even at high concentrations that simulate severe drought conditions [74,75].
This result provides the direct experimental evidence linking this novel species to drought resistance, a critical trait for a bioinoculant intended for use in arid or water-limited agricultural systems. This finding addresses the question of whether strains isolated from non-crop plants, especially those from stressful environments like tidal flats, could be useful for sustainable agricultural production.
In conclusion, the isolation and characterization of P. suaedae DGU8T contribute to our understanding of the microbial diversity in halophyte rhizospheres. By integrating robust genomic classification with functional genomics and targeted physiological assays, we have not only described a novel species but also provided strong evidence for its potential application in sustainable agriculture as a PGP agent with significant drought tolerance. The discovery of P. suaedae expands our understanding of the genus Paraburkholderia, particularly its ecological role in supporting plant development. Genomic insights confirmed the presence of key genes linked to nutrient mobilization and stress alleviation, suggesting potential applications in enhancing soil fertility and sustainable agriculture. Although this study was limited to in vitro assays, future research will include pot experiments to validate the strain’s plant growth-promoting efficacy under greenhouse and field conditions.

Description of Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov.

Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov. (su.ae’dae. N.L. gen. n. suaedae, of Suaeda, the plant from which the strain was isolated).
Cells are Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, motile, and rod-shaped, and possess a single polar flagellum. Cell dimensions range from 2.10 to 2.42 μm in length and from 0.77 to 0.81 μm in width. Colonies are circular, convex, and ivory-colored. Growth occurs on R2A and NA media but not on MA, TSA, or LB. The strain grows at temperatures between 15 and 37 °C (optimum: 30 °C), pH 4.0–11.0 (optimum: pH 7.0), and NaCl concentrations of 0–1.0% (w/v; optimum: 0%). Hydrolysis reactions were observed only for CM-cellulose and catalase. In API 20 NE tests, the strain showed positive reactions for nitrate reduction, esculin hydrolysis, β-galactosidase activity, and maltose assimilation. The major fatty acid is C16:0, and the predominant ubiquinone is Q-8. The G + C content of the genomic DNA is 62.5%. The type strain is DGU8T (= KACC 23737T = TBRC 19126T), isolated from the root of Suaeda japonica on Seongmodo Island, Republic of Korea. The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ/PIR accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences are PP702909 and JBFOAH010000000, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information related to this study is available at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13112498/s1. Figure S1: Phylogenetic tree based on average amino acid identity (AAI), constructed using strains analyzed in the UBCG2 refinement pipeline; Figure S2: Functional category distribution derived from the draft genome of strain DGU8T, annotated using the EggNOG and KEGG databases; Figure S3: Transmission electron microscopy image of strain DGU8T cultured on R2A agar at 30 °C for 4 days, visualized using a JEM-1010 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan); Table S1: Subsystem characteristics of strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T and five reference strains evaluated using the RAST annotation server; Table S2: Secondary metabolite gene cluster profiles of Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T; Table S3: Cellular fatty acids composition of novel strain DGU8T and their respective closest reference strains; Excel S1: Genome differences among 97 species of Paraburkholderia.; Excel S2: ANI/dDDH values for 88 species of Paraburkholdeira.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P.; Methodology, S.P.; Software, S.P.; Validation, S.P.; Formal analysis, S.P.; Investigation, H.L., S.Y., C.B., J.K., S.K. and T.N.; Resources, T.S.; Data curation, S.P.; Writing—original draft, S.P.; Writing—review and editing, T.S.; Visualization, S.P.; Supervision, T.S.; Project administration, T.S.; Funding acquisition, T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR; NIBR202402203), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of Republic of Korea; a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT, MSIT; 2022R1F1A1070108); and the Dongguk University Research Fund (2024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The genomic data for strain DGU8T, comprising the Whole Genome Shotgun sequence obtained through Sanger sequencing and the 16S rRNA gene sequence, have been submitted to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases. The accession numbers are JBFOAH010000000 for the whole genome and PP702909 for the 16S rRNA gene.

Acknowledgments

We thank Bernhard Schink (University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany) for proposing the species name.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
KEGGKyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
ANIaverage nucleotide identity
dDDHdigital DNA-DNA hybridization
ACC1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
CAS agaruniversal chrome azurol S agar

References

  1. Yin, J.; Gentine, P.; Slater, L.; Gu, L.; Pokhrel, Y.; Hanasaki, N.; Guo, S.; Xiong, L.; Schlenker, W. Future socio-ecosystem productivity threatened by compound drought–heatwave events. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 6, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wahab, A.; Abdi, G.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Ullah, S.; Shah, W.; Mumtaz, S.; Yasin, G.; Muresan, C.C.; Marc, R.A. Plants’ Physio-Biochemical and Phyto-Hormonal Responses to Alleviate the Adverse Effects of Drought Stress: A Comprehensive Review. Plants 2022, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ali, S.; Tyagi, A.; Park, S.; Mir, R.A.; Mushtaq, M.; Bhat, B.; Mahmoudi, H.; Bae, H. Deciphering the Plant Microbiome to Improve Drought Tolerance: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 201, 104933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kwak, G.-Y.; Han, Y.; Baik, S.; Kong, B.-M.; Yang, D.-C.; Kang, S.-C.; Sukweenadhi, J. Gold Nanoparticles Green-Synthesized by the Suaeda Japonica Leaf Extract and Screening of Anti-Inflammatory Activities on RAW 267.4 Macrophages. Coatings 2022, 12, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, Y.; Park, J.; Chung, Y. The Comparison of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Suaeda japonica Makino Presenting Different External Morphology (Amaranthaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2020, 5, 1616–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.M.; Lee, S.H.; Jung, J.Y.; Jeon, C.O. Marinobacterium Lutimaris sp. nov., Isolated from a Tidal Flat. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 1828–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stevens, H.; Brinkhoff, T.; Rink, B.; Vollmers, J.; Simon, M. Diversity and Abundance of Gram Positive Bacteria in a Tidal Flat Ecosystem. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 1810–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Winberg, P.C.; Lynch, T.P.; Murray, A.; Jones, A.R.; Davis, A.R. The Importance of Spatial Scale for the Conservation of Tidal Flat Macrobenthos: An Example from New South Wales, Australia. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 134, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, K.-Y.; Hwang, Y.-H.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, J.-J.; Nam, S.-J.; Yee, S.-T. Verification of the Antioxidant Activity of a Subterranean Part of Suaeda japonica Makino. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 109, 836–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shim, Y.J.; Soshnikova, V.; Anandapadmanaban, G.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Jimenez Perez, Z.E.; Markus, J.; Ju Kim, Y.; Castro-Aceituno, V.; Yang, D.C. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized by Suaeda japonica Makino and Their Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue. Optik 2019, 182, 1015–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chandrasekaran, A.; Jeon, Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Seo, D.-H.; Yuk, H.J.; Son, E.; Kim, D.-S.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, G.-J. Therapeutic Potential of Suaeda japonica Makino Leaf Extract Against Obesity in 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes and HFD-Induced C57BL/6 J Mice. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2025, 197, 2555–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, S.; Kim, I.; Chhetri, G.; Jung, Y.; Woo, H.; Seo, T. Draft Genome Sequence Analyses of Two Novel Marinobacter suadae sp. nov. and Wenyingzhuangia gilva sp. nov. Isolated from the Root of Suaeda Japonica Makino. Life 2024, 14, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sawana, A.; Adeolu, M.; Gupta, R.S. Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: Proposal for division of this genus into the emended genus Burkholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Paraburkholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Beukes, C.W.; Steenkamp, E.T.; Van Zyl, E.; Avontuur, J.; Chan, W.Y.; Hassen, A.I.; Palmer, M.; Mthombeni, L.S.; Phalane, F.L.; Sereme, T.K.; et al. Paraburkholderia Strydomiana sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia Steynii sp. nov.: Rhizobial symbionts of the fynbos legume Hypocalyptus sophoroides. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 1369–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feng, T.; Jeong, S.E.; Lim, J.J.; Hyun, S.; Jeon, C.O. Paraburkholderia Lacunae sp. nov., isolated from soil near an artificial pond. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wilhelm, R.C.; Murphy, S.J.L.; Feriancek, N.M.; Karasz, D.C.; DeRito, C.M.; Newman, J.D.; Buckley, D.H. Paraburkholderia Madseniana sp. nov., a phenolic acid-degrading bacterium isolated from acidic forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 2137–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wilhelm, R.C.; Cyle, K.T.; Martinez, C.E.; Karasz, D.C.; Newman, J.D.; Buckley, D.H. Paraburkholderia Solitsugae sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia Elongata sp. nov., a henolic acid-degrading bacteria isolated from forest soil and emended description of Paraburkholderia madseniana. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5093–5105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Parte, A.C. LPSN—List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature (Bacterio.Net), 20 Years On. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 1825–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Paulitsch, F.; Dall’Agnol, R.F.; Delamuta, J.R.M.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Da Silva Batista, J.S.; Hungria, M. Paraburkholderia Atlantica sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia Franconis sp. nov., two new nitrogen-fixing nodulating species isolated from atlantic forest soils in brazil. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1369–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vanwijnsberghe, S.; Peeters, C.; De Ridder, E.; Dumolin, C.; Wieme, A.D.; Boon, N.; Vandamme, P. Genomic Aromatic compound degradation potential of novel Paraburkholderia species: Paraburkholderia Domus sp. nov., Paraburkholderia Haematera sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia Nemoris sp. nov. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, W.; Zhao, D.; Liu, H.; Wu, L.; Hao, L. Inoculation of Paraburkholderia sp. GD17 improves seedling growth and tolerance to cadmium in Chinese cabbage. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2024, 227, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prihatna, C.; Yan, Q. Exopolysaccharide is required by Paraburkholderia Phytofirmans PsJN to confer drought-stress tolerance in Pea. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1442001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chhetri, G.; Kim, I.; Kim, J.; So, Y.; Park, S.; Jung, Y.; Seo, T. Paraburkholderia Tagetis sp. nov., a novel species isolated from roots of Tagetes patula enhances the growth and yield of Solanum Lycopersicum L. (Tomato). Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1140484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Herpell, J.B.; Schindler, F.; Bejtović, M.; Fragner, L.; Diallo, B.; Bellaire, A.; Kublik, S.; Foesel, B.U.; Gschwendtner, S.; Kerou, M.; et al. The Potato Yam Phyllosphere Ectosymbiont Paraburkholderia sp. Msb3 Is a Potent Growth Promotor in Tomato. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Clewley, J.P. Macintosh Sequence Analysis Software. DNAStar’s LaserGene. Mol. Biotechnol. 1995, 3, 221–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guindon, S.; Gascuel, O. A Simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; Stecher, G.; Nei, M.; Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and, maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of mucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid Prokaryotic Genome Annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schalk, I.J.; Rigouin, C.; Godet, J. An overview of siderophore biosynthesis among fluorescent pseudomonads and new insights into their complex cellular organization. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 1447–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Quadri, L.E.N.; Keating, T.A.; Patel, H.M.; Walsh, C.T. Assembly of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nonribosomal peptide siderophore pyochelin: In vitro reconstitution of aryl-4,2-Bisthiazoline synthetase activity from PchD, PchE, and PchF. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 14941–14954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Comai, L.; Kosuge, T. Cloning and characterization of iaaM, a virulence determinant of Pseudomonas savastanoi. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 149, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, C.H.; Han, S.H.; Kim, K.Y.; Cho, B.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Koo, B.S.; Kim, Y.C. Cloning and expression of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone (PQQ) genes from a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Enterobacter intermedium. Curr. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dos Santos, P.C.; Johnson, D.C.; Ragle, B.E.; Unciuleac, M.-C.; Dean, D.R. Controlled expression of Nif and Isc iron-sulfur protein maturation components reveals target specificity and limited functional replacement between the two systems. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 2854–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kobayashi, J.; Kondo, A. Disruption of Poly (3-Hydroxyalkanoate) depolymerase gene and overexpression of three poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate) biosynthetic genes improve poly (3-Hydroxybutyrate) production from nitrogen rich medium by Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019, 18, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wanner, B.L. Gene regulation by phosphate in enteric bacteria. J. Cell. Biochem. 1993, 51, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, S. Identification of genes involved in Fe–S cluster biosynthesis of nitrogenase in Paenibacillus Polymyxa WLY78. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Holden, V.I.; Wright, M.S.; Houle, S.; Collingwood, A.; Dozois, C.M.; Adams, M.D.; Bachman, M.A. Iron acquisition and siderophore release by carbapenem-resistant sequence Type 258 Klebsiella pneumoniae. mSphere 2018, 3, e00125-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Huerta-Cepas, J.; Szklarczyk, D.; Forslund, K.; Cook, H.; Heller, D.; Walter, M.C.; Rattei, T.; Mende, D.R.; Sunagawa, S.; Kuhn, M.; et al. eggNOG 4.5: A Hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D286–D293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chklovski, A.; Parks, D.H.; Woodcroft, B.J.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM2: A Rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat. Methods 2023, 20, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kim, J.; Na, S.-I.; Kim, D.; Chun, J. UBCG2: Up-to-Date Bacterial Core Genes and pipeline for phylogenomic analysis. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kim, D.; Park, S.; Chun, J. Introducing EzAAI: A pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of Microbial Genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brettin, T.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.E.; Reitz, Z.L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Metcalf, W.W.; Helfrich, E.J.N.; et al. antiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.; Chun, J. A Large-Scale Evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017, 110, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Goris, J.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Klappenbach, J.A.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Tiedje, J.M. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Eren, A.M.; Esen, Ö.C.; Quince, C.; Vineis, J.H.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; Delmont, T.O. Anvi’o: An advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Delmont, T.O.; Eren, A.M. Linking pangenomes and metagenomes: The Prochlorococcus metapangenome. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Graham, E.D.; Heidelberg, J.F.; Tully, B.J. Potential for primary productivity in a globally-distributed bacterial phototroph. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1861–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, S.; Kim, I.; Woo, H.; Lee, H.; Yook, S.; Seo, T. Flavobacterium Arundinis sp. nov., Flavobacterium Calami sp. nov., Flavobacterium Helocola sp. nov. and Flavobacterium Flavipallidum sp. nov., isolated from stagnant water in a clump of Phragmites Japonica Steud. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2025, 75, 006667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Baek, C.; Kim, I.; Park, S.; Woo, H.; Lee, H.; Yook, S.; Kwak, S.; Kim, J.; Seo, T. Isolation and characterization of Fibrella aquatica sp. nov. from freshwater, Fibrella musci sp. nov. from moss on soil and Fibrella arboris sp. nov. from moss on a tree. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2025, 75, 006842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gregersen, T. Rapid method for distinction of gram-negative from gram-positive bacteria. Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1978, 5, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kuykendall, L.D.; Roy, M.A.; O’neill, J.J.; Devine, T.E. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1988, 38, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Minnikin, D.E.; Patel, P.V.; Alshamaony, L.; Goodfellow, M. Polar Lipid Composition in the Classification of Nocardia and Related Bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1977, 27, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ali, S.Z.; Sandhya, V.; Venkateswar Rao, L. Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC Deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Ann. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Milagres, A.M.F.; Machuca, A.; Napoleão, D. Detection of siderophore production from several fungi and bacteria by a modification of chrome azurol S (CAS) agar plate assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 1999, 37, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Myo, E.M.; Ge, B.; Ma, J.; Cui, H.; Liu, B.; Shi, L.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, K. Indole-3-acetic acid production by Streptomyces fradiae NKZ-259 and its formulation to enhance plant growth. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kumar, H.; Khan, U.; Gond, S.K. Functional characterization and alleviation of cadmium stress by endophytic bacteria isolated from Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Total Environ. Microbiol. 2025, 1, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Palacios, O.A.; Bashan, Y.; de-Bashan, L.E. Proven and potential involvement of vitamins in interactions of plants with plant growth-promoting bacteria—An overview. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2014, 50, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yu, Y.; Yan, F.; Chen, Y.; Jin, C.; Guo, J.-H.; Chai, Y. Poly-γ-glutamic acids contribute to biofilm formation and plant root colonization in selected environmental isolates of Bacillus subtilis. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. O’Toole, G.; Kaplan, H.B.; Kolter, R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 49–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abo Elsoud, M.M.; Hasan, S.F.; Elhateir, M.M. Optimization of indole-3-acetic acid production by Bacillus velezensis isolated from Pyrus rhizosphere and its effect on plant growth. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 50, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pedraza, R.O. Recent advances in nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 125, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Vega-Celedón, P.; Castillo-Novales, D.; Bravo, G.; Cárdenas, F.; Romero-Silva, M.J.; Seeger, M. Synthesis and Degradation of the Phytohormone Indole-3-Acetic Acid by the Versatile Bacterium Paraburkholderia Xenovorans LB400 and Its Growth Promotion of Nicotiana Tabacum Plant. Plants 2024, 13, 3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Meher; Shivakrishna, P.; Ashok Reddy, K.; Manohar Rao, D. Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pishchik, V.N.; Chizhevskaya, E.P.; Chebotar, V.K.; Mirskaya, G.V.; Khomyakov, Y.V.; Vertebny, V.E.; Kononchuk, P.Y.; Kudryavtcev, D.V.; Bortsova, O.A.; Lapenko, N.G.; et al. PGPB Isolated from Drought-Tolerant Plants Help Wheat Plants to Overcome Osmotic Stress. Plants 2024, 13, 3381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene based on (A) neighbor-joining (NJ), (B) maximum likelihood (ML), and (C) maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Bootstrap values are shown as percentages from 1000 replicates (above 70%). Escherichia coli X80725T (ATCC11775) was used as the outgroup. The sum of branch lengths for the NJ and ML trees was 0.020 (substitutions/site). The tree length for the MP analysis was 20 steps.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene based on (A) neighbor-joining (NJ), (B) maximum likelihood (ML), and (C) maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Bootstrap values are shown as percentages from 1000 replicates (above 70%). Escherichia coli X80725T (ATCC11775) was used as the outgroup. The sum of branch lengths for the NJ and ML trees was 0.020 (substitutions/site). The tree length for the MP analysis was 20 steps.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g001
Figure 2. Genome statistics for 97 Paraburkholderia species including the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. (a) Genome length (Mbp), (b) number of contigs, (c) Contig N50 (kb), (d) Scaffold N50 (bp), (e) number of scaffolds, (f) G + C content (%), (g) total genes, and (h) protein-coding genes. The novel strain DGU8T is marked with a red dot.
Figure 2. Genome statistics for 97 Paraburkholderia species including the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. (a) Genome length (Mbp), (b) number of contigs, (c) Contig N50 (kb), (d) Scaffold N50 (bp), (e) number of scaffolds, (f) G + C content (%), (g) total genes, and (h) protein-coding genes. The novel strain DGU8T is marked with a red dot.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g002
Figure 3. UBCG2 phylogenetic tree constructed from 81 bacterial core gene sequences, illustrating the phylogenetic placement of the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T among 96 Paraburkholderia species. Bootstrap values (≥70%) were calculated from 100 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Scale bar = 0.50 substitutions per site.
Figure 3. UBCG2 phylogenetic tree constructed from 81 bacterial core gene sequences, illustrating the phylogenetic placement of the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T among 96 Paraburkholderia species. Bootstrap values (≥70%) were calculated from 100 replicates. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Scale bar = 0.50 substitutions per site.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g003
Figure 4. Heatmap matrix of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values for 88 Paraburkholderia species. Pairwise genome comparisons are displayed in a square matrix divided diagonally: the lower triangle presents ANI values in shades of red, while the upper triangle shows dDDH values in shades of purple. Color intensity reflects similarity levels, with darker shades indicating higher values.
Figure 4. Heatmap matrix of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values for 88 Paraburkholderia species. Pairwise genome comparisons are displayed in a square matrix divided diagonally: the lower triangle presents ANI values in shades of red, while the upper triangle shows dDDH values in shades of purple. Color intensity reflects similarity levels, with darker shades indicating higher values.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g004
Figure 5. Pan-genome analysis of five reference strains and the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. Genomes are clustered based on the presence/absence of 15,378 gene clusters, illustrating shared and unique genomic content across strains.
Figure 5. Pan-genome analysis of five reference strains and the novel strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. Genomes are clustered based on the presence/absence of 15,378 gene clusters, illustrating shared and unique genomic content across strains.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g005
Figure 6. KEGG decoder heatmap based on KEGG annotations for strain DGU8T and selected Paraburkholeria species. The heatmap illustrates the completeness of curated metabolic pathways, based on the presence/absence of genes, with an exclusive focus on functions related to plant growth promotion.
Figure 6. KEGG decoder heatmap based on KEGG annotations for strain DGU8T and selected Paraburkholeria species. The heatmap illustrates the completeness of curated metabolic pathways, based on the presence/absence of genes, with an exclusive focus on functions related to plant growth promotion.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g006
Figure 7. Drought resistance of Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T against PEG-induced osmotic stress. The strain was cultured at 30 °C for 3 days in R2A broth supplemented with various concentrations of PEG 6000 (0–25%, w/v) to simulate drought conditions. Bacterial growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Bars represent the mean values of triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard deviation.
Figure 7. Drought resistance of Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T against PEG-induced osmotic stress. The strain was cultured at 30 °C for 3 days in R2A broth supplemented with various concentrations of PEG 6000 (0–25%, w/v) to simulate drought conditions. Bacterial growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Bars represent the mean values of triplicate experiments, and error bars indicate the standard deviation.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g007
Figure 8. Functional evaluation of plant growth-promoting traits in strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. The strain exhibited (a) 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity, (b) nitrogen fixation, (c) phosphate solubilization, (d) siderophore production, and (e) indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production (measured at 530 nm after 30 min incubation with Salkowski’s reagent), indicating its potential role in enhancing plant growth under various environmental conditions. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 11.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). According to Duncan’s test, significant differences between treatment group was: **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 8. Functional evaluation of plant growth-promoting traits in strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. The strain exhibited (a) 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity, (b) nitrogen fixation, (c) phosphate solubilization, (d) siderophore production, and (e) indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production (measured at 530 nm after 30 min incubation with Salkowski’s reagent), indicating its potential role in enhancing plant growth under various environmental conditions. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 11.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). According to Duncan’s test, significant differences between treatment group was: **** p < 0.0001.
Microorganisms 13 02498 g008
Table 1. Genes associated with plant growth-promoting traits identified in the draft genome of strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. Gene functions include phosphate solubilization, pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) biosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, IAA production, and siderophore production. Annotation was performed using EggNOG.
Table 1. Genes associated with plant growth-promoting traits identified in the draft genome of strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T. Gene functions include phosphate solubilization, pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) biosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, IAA production, and siderophore production. Annotation was performed using EggNOG.
FunctionStartEndProductGene
Phosphate
solubilization
203,877205,151Phosphonoacetate hydrolasephnA
268,010268,771Phosphate-import ATP-binding protein PhnCphnC_1
281,941282,801Phosphate-import ATP-binding protein PhnCphnC_2
267,015267,914Putative ABC transporter phosphonate/phosphite binding protein PhnD2phnD2
268,768269,568Phosphate-import permease protein PhnEphnE_1
280,104280,928Phosphate-import permease protein PhnEphnE_2
277,734278,492putative transcriptional regulator PhnFphnF
277,076277,558Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate synthase subunit PhnGphnG
276,426277,076Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate synthase subunit PhnHphnH
275,287276,426Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate synthase subunit PhnIphnI
274,382275,290Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-phosphate C-P lyasephnJ
273,615274,385Putative phosphonates utilization ATP-binding protein PhnKphnK
272,839273,606Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate synthase subunit PhnLphnL
265,661266,794Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate diphosphatasephnM_1
271,672272,805Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate diphosphatasephnM_2
67,31268,208Alpha-D-ribose 1-methyl phosphonate 5-triphosphate diphosphatasephnM_3
279,238279,795Ribose 1,5-bisphosphate phosphokinase PhnNphnN
198,905199,996Putative 2-aminoethyl phosphonate-binding periplasmic proteinphnS
200,094201,194Putative 2-aminoethyl phosphonate import ATP-binding protein PhnTphnT
202,112202,975Putative 2-aminoethyl phosphonate transport system permease protein PhnVphnV
18,65218,798Phosphonoacetaldehyde dehydrogenasephnY_1
205,148206,599Phosphonoacetaldehyde dehydrogenasephnY_2
206,604207,1642-Amino-1-hydroxymethyl phosphonate dioxygenase (glycine-forming)phnZ
332,262332,963Phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein PhoBphoB_1
125,536126,231Phosphate regulon transcriptional regulatory protein PhoBphoB_2
124,094124,777Virulence transcriptional regulatory protein PhoPphoP
333,075334,388Phosphate regulon sensor protein PhoRphoR
331,531332,235Phosphate-specific transport system accessory protein PhoUphoU_1
34,39135,098Phosphate-specific transport system accessory protein PhoUphoU_2
45,97546,682Phosphate-specific transport system accessory protein PhoUphoU_3
334,488336,551Polyphosphate kinaseppk
336,733338,367Exopolyphosphataseppx
329,732330,628Phosphate transport system permease protein PstApstA
330,646331,503Phosphate import ATP-binding protein PstBpstB
328,737329,735Phosphate transport system permease protein PstCpstC
327534328565Phosphate-binding protein PstSpstS
180,222181,160Phosphate acetyltransferasepta
196,720198,183Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenasezwf_1
Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) production207,713208,651Coenzyme PQQ synthesis protein BpqqB
208,714209,481Pyrroloquinoline-quinone synthasepqqC
209,478209,768PqqA binding proteinpqqD
209,773210,993PqqA peptide cyclasepqqE
Nitrogen fixation123,632124,045Iron-sulfur cluster assembly scaffold protein IscUiscU
140,604141,059Zinc-dependent sulfurtransferase SufUsufU
92,43294,072Nitrogen fixation protein VnfAvnfA
Production of IAA54547304Tryptophan 2-monooxygenaseiaaM
154,601155,413Tryptophan synthase alpha chaintrpA
152,447153,640Tryptophan synthase beta chaintrpB
14,33315,118Indole-3-glycerol phosphate synthasetrpC
13,27114,302Anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferasetrpD
11,12012,613Anthranilate synthase component 1trpE
151,687152,421N-(5′-phosphoribosyl)anthranilate isomerasetrpF
12,62713,253Anthranilate synthase component 2trpG
59836861HTH-type transcriptional regulator TrpItrpI
91,03791,969Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenasekynA
Production of
siderophore
46,94248,5194-Cresol dehydrogenase [hydroxylating] flavoprotein subunitpchF
59187165Enterobactin exporter EntSentS_1
161,718163,079Enterobactin exporter EntSentS_2
137,907139,169Enterobactin exporter EntSentS_3
105,651108,170Acyl-homoserine lactone acylase PvdQpvdQ
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T compared with reference Paraburkholderia strains.
Table 2. Physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain Paraburkholderia suaedae DGU8T compared with reference Paraburkholderia strains.
CharacteristicStrain
123456
Colony colorIvoryWhiteCreamYellowWhiteWhite
Optimum growth temperature (°C)302530303030
Optimum growth pH787766
Catalase activity++++++
Oxidase activity+++
Hydrolysis of:
Casein++
Chitin
Tween 20+
Carboxymethyl cellulose+++
Assimilation of (API 20 NE):
D-maltose+
4-Nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside+++++
Aesculin+++++
Strains: 1, P. suaedae DGU8T; 2, P. fynbosensis LMG 27177T; 3, P. ginsengisoli NBRC 100965T; 4, P. panacisoli DCY113T; 5, P. ribeironis STM 7296T; 6, P. ultramafica LMG 28614T. +, positive; −, negative.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, S.; Lee, H.; Yook, S.; Baek, C.; Kim, J.; Kwak, S.; Na, T.; Seo, T. Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov., a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Isolated from the Halophyte Suaeda japonica. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112498

AMA Style

Park S, Lee H, Yook S, Baek C, Kim J, Kwak S, Na T, Seo T. Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov., a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Isolated from the Halophyte Suaeda japonica. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(11):2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112498

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Sunho, Hyunji Lee, Subin Yook, Chunghwan Baek, Jisu Kim, Seunghui Kwak, Taeho Na, and Taegun Seo. 2025. "Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov., a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Isolated from the Halophyte Suaeda japonica" Microorganisms 13, no. 11: 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112498

APA Style

Park, S., Lee, H., Yook, S., Baek, C., Kim, J., Kwak, S., Na, T., & Seo, T. (2025). Paraburkholderia suaedae sp. nov., a Potential Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Isolated from the Halophyte Suaeda japonica. Microorganisms, 13(11), 2498. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13112498

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop