Next Article in Journal
Protein Elicitor PeBL1 of Brevibacillus laterosporus Enhances Resistance Against Myzus persicae in Tomato
Next Article in Special Issue
Bovine Papillomavirus Type 2 Infection Associated with Papillomatosis of the Amniotic Membrane in Water Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
Previous Article in Journal
Occurrence and Characterization of Salmonella Isolated from Table Egg Layer Farming Environments in Western Australia and Insights into Biosecurity and Egg Handling Practices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) in Equine Sarcoid: An Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Study

1
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, Naples University “Federico II”, Via F. Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, MSA, 80126 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2020, 9(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010058
Submission received: 3 December 2019 / Revised: 8 January 2020 / Accepted: 9 January 2020 / Published: 14 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bovine Papillomavirus Infection)

Abstract

:
Background: equine sarcoids are the most frequent skin tumors in equidae worldwide. It is well known that delta bovine papillomaviruses are their causative agents. We have recently shown the presence in equine sarcoids of abnormal vessel structures, which could cause a hypoxic condition. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) in a subset of BPV positive equine sarcoids and explore the relationship with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression. Results: 80% of equine sarcoids showed strong cytoplasmic staining in >60% of neoplastic fibroblasts, while 20% of samples showed a moderate cytoplasmic staining in 40–60% of neoplastic fibroblasts for HIF-1α. Results of Western blotting (WB) were consistent with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Moreover, a positive correlation between HIF-1α and VEGF expression (r = 0.60, p < 0.01) was observed. Conclusion: we have shown that HIF-1α was strongly expressed in equine sarcoid. The upregulation of HIF-1α has been described in numerous tumors and can be modulated by many proteins encoded by transforming viruses. Thus, it is also possible that BPV could have a relevant role in HIF-1α pathway regulation, contributing to the development of equine sarcoids by promoting HIF-1α/VEGF mediated tumor angiogenesis.
Keywords:
BPV; equine; HIF-1α; sarcoid; VEGF

1. Introduction

Equine sarcoids are the most frequent fibroblastic benign skin tumor in equidae worldwide, with prevalence rates of 0.5–2.0% [1,2]. They often form from scar tissue or sites of a previous wound or trauma, on the head, the limbs, the ventrum, and the paragenital region [3]. Sarcoids often persist, can be locally invasive, and rarely regress [3,4], although it has been recently reported that a high percentage of equine sarcoids spontaneously disappeared without therapy [5]. It is widely known that these lesions do not always respond to therapy and are often correlated with a high recurrence rate after surgical excision [3,4,6], leading to morbidity and impacting the function and aesthetics of affected equids, which decreases their economic value [7,8]. Equine sarcoids have a multifactorial cause [9]; however, it has been proved that there is a strong correlation between permanent infection with delta bovine papillomaviruses (BPV type 1, 2 and 13), and persistent and progressive sarcoids [7,10,11]. The evidence that BPV has a main role in the pathogenesis of sarcoids may be partly explained by the detection, in naturally occurring equine sarcoid, of BPV DNA in an episomal form and in multiple copies [11,12,13,14]. In addition, BPV oncogenes and capsid gene transcripts (E2, E5, E7, and L1) have been shown in equine sarcoid tissue [15,16,17], indicating the beginning of viral transcription and replication [12,18,19] and providing evidence for a direct involvement of BPV in equine sarcoids development. The protein E5, in synergy with E7, induces DNA damages and genomic instability [20,21,22,23], leading to the cell transformation and to subsequent development of cancer [12]. The principal mechanisms whereby the BPV major oncogene E5 induces malignant transformation, involve the activation of platelet-derived growth factor βeta-receptor (PDGFβ-r) [24], the immune evasion [11], the resistance to apoptosis [25], the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) with consequent alteration of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover [26], and the increase of angiogenesis [27]. Angiogenesis, the development of new vessels, is necessary for neoplastic invasion, growth, and metastasis, and has a crucial role in the development and progression of numerous human and animal cancers [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Angiogenesis is induced in response to hypoxia, and cellular response to hypoxia is primarily regulated through the activity of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) [38,39]. HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed by HIF-1alpha (HIF-1α) and HIF-1beta (HIF-1β) subunits. The latter, also known as aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, is constitutively expressed in the cell nucleus, whereas HIF-1α is synthesized continuously in an oxygen-dependent manner. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is rapidly hydroxylated and degraded by prolyl hydroxylases (PHD). Under hypoxia, which is common in tumors, HIF-1α heterodimerizes with the HIF-1β subunit, and together, by translocating to the nucleus, they bind DNA and increase the transcription of target genes, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [40,41,42]. It is now accepted that VEGF expression is mediated by HIF-1α during hypoxia, and the expression of HIF-1α directly correlates with VEGF expression and tumor vascularity in several tumors [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Tumor hypoxia often appears in many cancers as a result of tumor growth exceeding its own angiogenic capability. In this regard, HIF-1α plays a crucial role in the adaptative response of neoplastic cells to oxygen limitation, inducing activation of numerous genes that are involved in angiogenesis. Moreover, besides being a ‘guardian’ of oxygen homeostasis, HIF-1α has recently emerged as a key player in energy metabolism, survival, cell migration, and in immune cell regulation [40,41,42,52,53].
We have recently shown an overexpression of VEGF and abnormal vessel structures [27] in equine sarcoids, which could cause a hypoxic condition, leading to an upregulation of HIF-1α.
Since the specific function of HIF-1α in sarcoid pathogenesis has not been investigated, so far, we analyzed the expression of HIF-1α in 35 BPV positive equine sarcoids and explored the relationship with VEGF expression reported in our previous study [27].

2. Results

2.1. Histological Features

The examined sarcoids (n = 35) showed the classic histological features of the lesion: epidermal hyperplasia with rete pegs; hyperkeratosis; proliferation of neoplastic fibroblast in the dermal layer, oriented in a ‘picket fence’ perpendicular to the basilar epidermal layer; exuberant extracellular matrix; presence of many small vessels irregular in shape [26,27].

2.2. Immunohistochemical Results

All results of HIF-1α expression pattern in 35 equine sarcoids and 10 normal skin samples are shown in Table 1.

2.2.1. Control Samples

Equine kidney used as positive control showed strong immunostaining for HIF-1α in tubular epithelial cells (Figure S1). Equine normal skin and sarcoid, used as the control, showed staining for Purified Rabbit IgG (P120–201-Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.) in cells at the base of the epidermis but not in fibroblasts (Figures S2 and S3). All 10/10 normal skin samples showed immunostaining for HIF-1α, in 10% of basal epidermal cells. Fibroblasts were negative (Figure 1).

2.2.2. Sarcoid Samples

HIF-1α immunostaining was detected in all 35 equine sarcoid samples. In 28/35 sarcoid samples (80%), a strong immunolabeling was observed as finely granular cytoplasmic staining in >60% of neoplastic fibroblasts and endothelial cells (score 3; ++) (Figure 2a). Among these samples (score 3, ++), 100% were located on neck (2/2) and paragenital region (3/3), 90% (9/10) on limb, 83% (5/6) on head, 66% (4/6) were on abdomen, and 62% (5/8) on pectoral region.
The remaining 7/35 sarcoid samples (20%) showed a moderate granular cytoplasmic staining for HIF-1α in 40–60% of neoplastic fibroblasts (score 2, +) (Figure 2b). Among these samples (score 2, +), 10% (1/10) were located on limb, 34% (2/6) were located on abdomen, 38% (3/8) on pectoral region, and 17% (1/6) on head.

2.3. Statistical Results

The rank correlation analysis showed that the percentage of HIF-1α positive cells was positively correlated with the percentage of VEGF positive cells found during a previous study by our group (r = 0.60 p < 0.01) [27].

2.4. Biochemical Results

By Western blot, a band of the expected molecular size for HIF-1α (120 kDa, Figure S4) was identified in the tested samples, as well as in Hela and K562 cell lines used as positive control as suggested by antibody datasheet and literature data, confirming the specificity of the antibody (Figure 3A) [54]. HIF-1α was expressed at higher levels in sarcoid samples with respect to normal skin samples, where the band was detected at low to undetectable levels, as confirmed by densitometric analysis (Figure 3A,B).

3. Discussion

The insufficient levels of cellular oxygen, a condition also known as hypoxia, were demonstrated in many tumors [55] and were associated with a structural and functional abnormality of vessels or to an increase of oxygen consumption caused by the rapid proliferation of neoplastic cells [56]. HIF-1α has a relevant role in oxygen homeostasis, and experimental evidence has indicated that it is a major regulator of normal and tumor cell adaption to hypoxic stress [52,53,55,57]. HIF-1 is a heterodimeric protein composed of a constitutively expressed HIF-1β subunit and an O2-regulated HIF-1α subunit [58]. HIF-1α is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [59] under normoxic conditions, while it is protected from ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation under hypoxic-conditions [42]. After PHD inhibition, HIF-1α dimerizes in HIF-1β to form HIF-1, which is responsible for the transcription of genes encoding glucose transporters, glycolytic enzymes, and VEGF [40,41,42]. HIF-1α and VEGF are major regulators of angiogenesis [60] in the tumor microenvironment and have a crucial role in tumor progression [60,61,62]. As VEGF [27,29,32,34,60], HIF-1α is overexpressed in a large variety of tumors [60,63], and its association with unfavorable prognosis has been reported, as it activates genes that play a relevant role in angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [57,59,64].
In this study, we have observed, by immunohistochemistry and biochemical analysis, HIF-1α expression levels in BPV positive equine sarcoids, located in different body regions [27], and we have evaluated the correlation between HIF-1α and VEGF expression, previously analyzed in a study of ours.
In our samples, surprisingly, HIF-1α showed a cytoplasmic expression, while the antibody used by us (#ab114977, Abcam) was reported to have a nuclear expression. We hypothesize that the abnormal upregulation and accumulation of HIF-1α in the cytoplasm could be related to the inhibition of prolyl-hydroxylation (PHD) under hypoxia and to the consequent suppression of HIF-1α degradation, leading to its rapid accumulation in the cytoplasm [65]. HIF-1α shuttling between cytoplasm and nucleus is a complex process regulated by numerous factors [65], and it was already reported its cytoplasmic expression in a broad spectrum of tumors [66,67].
All normal skin samples showed negative immunostaining for HIF-1α in fibroblast, while a weak immunostaining was observed in the basal epidermal cells, where HIF-1α is known to be constitutively expressed. Moreover, 80% of sarcoid samples showed a strong and finely granular cytoplasmic staining for HIF-1α in >60% of sarcoid fibroblasts and endothelial cells, while in remaining samples (20%) the intensity of immunostaining was moderate and observed in 40–60% of neoplastic fibroblasts and endothelial cells.
Although the samples located on the neck, paragenital region, and limb showed higher intensity staining and percentage positive score (see Table 1), no correlation could be demonstrated.
In a previous study [27] including the same samples, we have reported VEGF overexpression in most keratinocytes, sarcoid fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Moreover, we have recently shown that, even if small blood vessels were numerous, they showed irregularity in shape, and their lumina appeared indistinct. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that in sarcoid tissue, there could be a hypoxic condition in which HIF-1α would have a crucial role, leading to the upregulation of VEGF and an increase in the vessels’ number. However, despite the increase of vessels, they didn’t appear sufficiently mature, possibly inducing worse or persistent hypoxia, which in turn could induce the upregulation of HIF-1α and then of VEGF. This strict relationship between HIF-1α and VEGF was also, in part, evidenced in our statistical analysis results, which showed a positive correlation between HIF-1α and VEGF expression (r = 0.60; p < 0.01). Our results seem to suggest that HIF-1α not only could regulate VEGF expression but also contributes to the formation of a complex proangiogenic microenvironment in equine sarcoids, thereby affecting vessels’ morphology and, ultimately, the vessels’ function [68].
Numerous studies reported that HIF-1α synthesis, or its decreased degradation, can be modulated by different tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, among which there are many proteins encoded by transforming viruses [58,69]. There is strong evidence that human papillomaviruses (HPV) oncoproteins can promote tumor angiogenesis via the upregulation of HIF1/VEGF pathways, specifically manipulating aspects of the cellular hypoxic response [70,71]. HPV E6 and E7 were shown to increase independently the induction of HIF-1α [65] or to interfere with HIF-1α degradation, leading to the inactivation of proteasomal degradation and to HIF-1α stabilization [39,72,73]. Moreover, built upon these evidences, and in light of the common biological functions of papillomavirus oncogenes [74], we may speculate that BPV oncoproteins could play a relevant role in regulation of HIF-1α pathway, contributing, at least in part, to the development of equine sarcoids by promoting HIF1α/VEGF mediated tumor angiogenesis.
Further investigations are needed to clarify the specific role of BPV in the regulation of HIF-1α/VEGF pathway, and to evaluate if there could be any correlation in equine sarcoid between HIF-1α and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), which is known to be the rate-limiting enzyme for glycolysis [75]. In hypoxic conditions, neoplastic cells have been reported to increase GLUT1 expression under the positive regulation of HIF-1α, leading to increase cellular glucose uptake, and support the aerobic glycolysis of cancer cells [75].
We believe that new knowledge of equine sarcoid pathogenesis would be necessary in order to gain new insights into the development of novel therapies for this pathology.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Tumor Samples

We analyzed 10 normal skin samples and 35 equine sarcoids. The normal skin samples, located on head (n = 3), abdomen (n = 2), neck (n = 2), limb (n = 2), and pectoral regions (n = 1), were obtained during necropsy from healthy horses. The equine sarcoids, located on the limbs (n = 10), pectoral region (n = 8), head (n = 6), abdomen (n = 6), paragenital (n = 3) and neck (n = 2) (Table 1), were surgically excised from affected horses, using best practice of veterinary care, according to Directive 2010/63/EU (art. 1), and processed for routine diagnosis and treatment. Each owner consented to use tissues for research purposes, according to the ethical guidelines of the Anatomic Pathology Diagnostic Service of the Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production (University of Naples Federico II). All samples were 10% formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded for routine histological processing, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Four sarcoids (S26, S27, S28, S29) and 2 normal skin samples (N6–N7) were immediately frozen at −80 °C and analyzed by Western blotting. Al sarcoid samples, the same as those previously used [27], were BPV positive, while normal skin samples were BPV negative [24]. Moreover, no previous treatments with topical or intra-tumoral therapy prior to excision were used.

4.2. Immunohistochemistry

Sections (5 μm) were processed for immunohistochemistry using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. All sections were deparaffinized in alcohol decreasing solutions, and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation in 0.3% H2O2 in methanol for 20 min. Antigen retrieval was performed by pre-treating with microwave heating (twice for 5 min each at 750 W) in citrate buffer, pH 6.0. The slides were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.01 M), then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with normal goat serum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) diluted at 20% in PBS. As primary antibody, a polyclonal rabbit anti-human (predicted to cross-react with horse) to anti-HIF-1α (#ab114977, Abcam; 775–826 amino acids at C terminal) diluted 1:100 in PBS was used and applied overnight at 4 °C. Control sections (equine normal skin and sarcoid) were incubated with PBS instead of the primary antibody and with rabbit IgG (Purified Rabbit IgG P120-201-Bethyl Laboratories, Inc.) at the same concentration as the primary antibody. Equine kidney sections were used as positive control and incubated with anti-HIF-1α antibody (#ab114977, Abcam; 775–826 amino acids at C terminal).
Then, sections were incubated with MACH 1 probe (Biocare Medical, LLC, Concord, CA, USA) for 20 min at room temperature and with MACH-1 Universal HPR-Polymer (Biocare Medical, LLC, Concord, CA, USA) for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, and the immunolabelling was revealed with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride.

4.3. Scoring of Immunoreactivity

For the evaluation of HIF-1α expression, a semiquantitative score was applied by two independent observers (Martano M. and Maiolino P.) under blinded conditions. Briefly, for each sample, we have established the number of immunolabeled cells by counting 1000 cells in 10 fields at 400× magnification (40× objective 10× ocular), and we have expressed results as percentage and scored as follows: 0 (≤10% positive cells); 1 (10–40% positive cells); 2 (40–60% positive cells); 3 (>60% positive cells). Moreover, the intensity of immunostaining was graded, as performed in a previous study [27]: n.a. (not assessable), − (negative staining), +/− (weak immunostaining), + (moderate immunostaining), and ++ (strong immunostaining) (Table 1).

4.4. Statistical Analysis

Pearson correlation test was used to correlate the percentage of HIF-1α positive cells with the percentage of VEGF positive cells reported in a previous study [27].

4.5. Protein Extraction and SDS PAGE/Western Blotting

Tissue samples homogenization, protein extraction, denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and WB was performed as previously described [27]. The membranes were subjected to blocking by using Tris buffered saline (TBS: 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 165 mM NaCl) added with 0.1% Tween 20 (TTBS) and 5% non-fat dry milk, at room temperature for 1 h. The anti-HIF antibody (#ab114977, Abcam) at 1:1000 dilution was incubated overnight at 4 °C.
Following four washing steps of 10 min in TTBS, donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with peroxidase was employed at 1:2000 dilution for 1 h at room temperature. After additional washing steps, bound antibody was visualized by enzyme chemiluminescence with Clarity ™ Western ECL Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Milano, Italy). The blots were stripped and reprobed for β-actin (CP01, Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) (1:500) as a loading control in order to perform normalization. Protein quantization and normalization were performed as reported in a previous study [27].

5. Conclusions

Finally, in our study, we have demonstrated for the first time the increase of HIF-1α expression in equine sarcoid, and we hypothesized that HIF-1α, together with VEGF, could have a role in sarcoid development.
Recent advances in cancer biology at the cellular and molecular levels highlighted the HIF-1α pathway as a crucial survival pathway for which novel strategies of cancer therapy could be developed [76]. We hope that in the future, hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) could be an important cancer drug target for equine sarcoid, since not all sarcoids are responsive to therapy, despite the numerous treatment choices available.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/1/58/s1. Figure S1: Equine kidney used as positive control showed strong immunostaining for HIF-1α in tubular epithelial cells; Figure S2: Equine normal skin showed staining for Purified Rabbit IgG (P120-201-Bethyl laboratories-INC) in cells at the base of the epidermis but not in fibroblasts; Figure S3: Equine sarcoid showed staining for Purified Rabbit IgG (P120-201-Bethyl laboratories-INC) in cells at the base of the epidermis but not in fibroblasts; Figure S4: Full length membrane of Western blotting for HIF-1 α from Figure 3, demonstrating detection of a band at the expected molecular size (~120 kDa) in equine tissue samples, Hela and K562 cell lines. Molecular markers (M) are shown, molecular weights in kDa are indicated on the left of each M band.
The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M. and P.M.; methodology, M.M., G.A., and K.P.; validation, G.A., F.C., and B.R.; writing—review and editing, G.B., M.M., and P.M.; supervision, G.B., B.R., and F.C.; project administration, P.M.; funding acquisition, P.M. and M.M. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We have received funding from the Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples, Italy.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Maria Casciello and Luca Licenziato (Department of Veterinary medicine and animal production) for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BPV-1Bovine papillomavirus type-1
BPV-2Bovine papillomavirus type-2
BPV-13Bovine papillomavirus type-13
HPVsHuman Papillomaviruses
HIF1Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α)
VEGFVascular Endothelial Growth Factor
IHCImmunohistochemistry
WBWestern Blotting
Nnormal skin
PDGFβ-rPlatelet-Derived Growth Factor βeta-receptor
MMPsMatrix Metalloproteinase
ECMExtracellular Matrix
PHDProlyl Hydroxylases

References

  1. Pascoe, R.R.; Summers, P.M. Clinical Survey of Tumours and Tumor Like Lesions in Horses in Southeast. Equ. Vet. J. 1981, 13, 325–329. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ragland, W.L.; Keown, G.H.; Spencer, G.R. Equine Sarcoid. Equ. Vet. J. 1970, 2, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nasir, L.; Campo, M.S. Bovine Papillomaviruses: Their Role in the Aetiology of Cutaneous Tumours of Bovids and Equids. Vet. Dermatol. 2008, 19, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Borzacchiello, G.; Corteggio, A. Equine Sarcoid: State of the art. Ippologia 2009, 20, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berruex, F.; Gerber, V.; Wohlfender, F.D.; Burger, D.; Koch, C. Clinical Course of Sarcoids in 61 Franches-Montagnes Horses over a 5–7-year Period. Vet. Q. 2016, 36, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nasir, L.; Brandt, S. Papillomavirus Associated Diseases of the Horse. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 167, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Angelos, J.; Marti, E.; Lazary, S.; Carmichael, L. Characterization of BPV-like DNA in in Equine Sarcoids. Arch. Virol. 1991, 119, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Otten, N.; von Tscharner, C.; Lazary, S.; Antczak, D.; Gerber, H. DNA of Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1 and 2 in Equine Sarcoids: PCR Detection and Direct Sequencing. Arch. Virol. 1993, 132, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bergvall, K.E. Sarcoids. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Pract. 2013, 29, 657–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Borzacchiello, G.; Roperto, F. Bovine Papillomaviruses, Papillomas and Cancer in Cattle. Vet. Res. 2008, 39, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Campo, M. Animal Models of Papilloma Virus Pathogenesis. Virus Res. 2002, 89, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Carr, E.A.; Théon, A.P.; Madewell, B.R.; Hitchcock, M.E.; Schlegel, R.; Schiller, J.T. Expression of a Transforming Gene (E5) of Bovine Papillomavirus in Sarcoids Obtained from Horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2001, 62, 1212–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martens, A.; De Moor, A.; Ducatelle, R. PCR Detection of Bovine Papilloma Virus DNA in Superficial Swabs and Scrapings from Equine Sarcoids. Vet. J. 2001, 161, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martens, A.; De Moor, A.; Vlaminck, L.; Pille, F.; Steenhaut, M. Evaluation of Excision, Cryosurgery and Local BCG Vaccination for the Treatment of Equine Sarcoids. Vet. Rec. 2001, 49, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Brandt, S.; Haralambus, R.; Schoster, A.; Kirnbauer, R.; Stanek, C. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Represent a Reservoir of Bovine Papillomavirus DNA in Sarcoid-Affected Equines. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 1390–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brandt, S.; Tober, R.; Corteggio, A.; Burger, S.; Sabitzer, S.; Walter, I.; Kainzbauer, C.; Steinborn, R.; Nasir, L.; Borzacchiello, G. BPV-1 Infection is not Confined to the Dermis but Also Involves the Epidermis of Equine Sarcoids. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 150, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilson, A.D.; Armstrong, E.L.; Gofton, R.G.; Mason, J.; De Toit, N.; Day, M.J. Characterization of Early and Late Bovine Papillomavirus Protein Expression in Equine Sarcoids. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 23, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chambers, G.; Ellsmore, V.A.; O’Brien, P.M.; Reid, S.W.; Love, S.; Campo, M.S.; Nasir, L. Association of Bovine Papillomavirus with the Equine Sarcoid. J. Gen. Virol. 2003, 84, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nasir, L.; Reid, S.W. Bovine Papillomaviral Gene Expression in Equine Sarcoid Tumours. Virus Res. 1999, 61, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Araldi, R.; Melo, T.; Diniz, N.; Carvalho, R.; Beçak, W.; Stocco, R. Bovine Papillomavirus Clastogenic Effect Analyzed in Comet Assay. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Campos, S.; Melo, T.; Assaf, S.; Araldi, R.; Mazzuchelli-de-Souza, J.; Sircili, M.; Carvalho, R.; Roperto, F.; Beçak, W.; Stocco, R. Chromosome Aberrations in Cells Infected with Bovine Papillomavirus: Comparing Cutaneous Papilloma, Esophagus Papilloma, and Urinary Bladder Lesion Cells. ISRN Oncol. 2013, 910849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Melo, T.; Araldi, R.; Pessoa, N.; De-Sá-Júnior, P.; Carvalho, R.; Beçak, W.; Stocco, R.C. Bos Taurus Papillomavirus Activity in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells: Demonstrating a Productive Infection. Gen. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 16712–16727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stocco dos Santos, R.C.; Lindsey, C.J.; Ferraz, O.P.; Pinto, J.R.; Mirandola, R.S.; Benesi, F.J.; Birgel, E.H.; Pereira, C.A.; Beçak, W. Bovine Papillomavirus Transmission and Chromosomal Aberrations: An Experimental Model. J. Gen. Virol. 1998, 79, 2127–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Borzacchiello, G.; Russo, V.; Della Salda, L.; Roperto, S.; Roperto, F. Expression of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-β Receptor and Bovine Papillomavirus E5 and E7 Oncoproteins in Equine Sarcoid. J. Comp. Pathol. 2008, 139, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cotugno, R.; Gallotta, D.; d’Avenia, M.; Corteggio, A.; Altamura, G.; Roperto, F.; Belisario, M.A.; Borzacchiello, G. BAG3 Protects Bovine Papillomavirus Type 1-Transformed Equine Fibroblasts Against Pro-Death Signals. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Martano, M.; Corteggio, A.; Restucci, B.; De Biase, M.E.; Borzacchiello, G.; Maiolino, P. Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in Equine Sarcoid: An Immunohistochemical and Molecular Study. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Martano, M.; Power, K.; Restucci, B.; Pagano, I.; Altamura, G.; Borzacchiello, G.; Maiolino, P. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in Equine Sarcoid. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Folkman, J. Role of Angiogenesis in Tumor Growth and Metastasis. Semin. Oncol. 2002, 6 (Suppl. 16), 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maiolino, P.; De Vico, G.; Restucci, B. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Basal Cell Tumours and in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Canine Skin. J. Comp. Pathol. 2000, 123, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maiolino, P.; Papparella, S.; Restucci, B.; De Vico, G. Angiogenesis in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Canine Skin: An Immunohistochemical and Quantitative Analysis. J. Comp. Pathol. 2001, 125, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martano, M.; Maiolino, P.; Cataldi, M.; Restucci, B. Evaluation of Angiogenesis by Morphometric Analysis of Blood Vessels in Dysplastic and Neoplastic Lesions of Canine Gingiva. Vet. Res. Commun. 2004, 28, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martano, M.; Restucci, B.; Ceccarelli, D.M.; Lo Muzio, L.; Maiolino, P. Immunohistochemical Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Canine Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 1, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Restucci, B.; De Vico, G.; Maiolino, P. Evaluation of Angiogenesis in Canine Mammary Tumors by Quantitative Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Immunohistochemistry. Vet. Pathol. 2000, 37, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Restucci, B.; Papparella, S.; Maiolino, P.; De Vico, G. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Canine Mammary Tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2002, 39, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Restucci, B.; Maiolino, P.; Paciello, O.; Martano, M.; De Vico, G.; Papparella, S. Evaluation of Angiogenesis in Canine Seminomas by Quantitative Immunohistochemistry. J. Comp. Pathol. 2003, 128, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Restucci, B.; Borzacchiello, G.; Maiolino, P.; Martano, M.; Paciello, O.; Papparella, S. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Flk-1 in Canine Mammary Tumours. J. Comp. Pathol. 2004, 130, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Restucci, B.; Martano, M.; Maiolino, P. Expression of Endothelin-1 and Endothelin-1 Receptor A in Canine Mammary Tumours. Res. Vet. Sci. 2015, 100, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bárdos, J.I.; Ashcroft, M. Negative and Positive Regulation of HIF-1: A Complex Network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1755, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brat, D.J.; Kaur, B.; Van Meir, E.G. Genetic Modulation of Hypoxia Induced Gene Expression and Angiogenesis: Relevance to Brain Tumors. Front. Biosci. 2003, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Majmundar, A.J.; Wong, W.J.; Simon, M.C. Hypoxia Inducible Factors and the Response to Hypoxic Stress. Mol. Cells 2010, 40, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Shay, J.E.S.; Simon, M.C. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors: Crosstalk between Inflammation and Metabolism. Cell Dev. Biol. 2001, 23, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Weidemann, A.; Johnson, R.S. Biology of HIF-1alpha. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Aebersold, D.M.; Burri, P.; Beer, K.T.; Laissue, J.; Djonov, V.; Greiner, R.H.; Semenza, G.L. Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 a Novel Predictive and Prognostic Parameter in the Radiotherapy of Oropharyngeal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2911–2916. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Beasley, N.J.P.; Leek, R.; Alam, M.; Turley, H.; Cox, G.J.; Gatter, K.; Millard, P.; Fuggle, S.; Harris, A.L. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 in Head and Neck Cancer: Relationship to Tumor Biology and Treatment Outcome in Surgically Resected Patients. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 2493–2497. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Bos, R.; Zhong, H.; Hanrahan, C.F.; Mommers, E.C.; Semenza, G.L.; Pinedo, H.M.; Abeloff MDSimons, J.W.; van Diest, P.J.; van der Wall, E. Levels of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 during Breast Carcinogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Giatromanolaki, A.; Koukourakis, M.I.; Sivrids, E.; Turley, H.; Talks, K.; Pezzella, F.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L. Relation of Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1 and 2 in Operable Non-Small Lung Cancer to Angiogenic/ Molecular Profile of Tumors and Survival. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 85, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Koukourakis, M.I.; Giatromanolak, I.A.; Sivrids, E.; Simopoulos, C.; Turley, H.; Talks, K.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF1 and HIF2), Angiogenesis, and Chemoradiotherapy Outcome of Squamous Cell Head-and-Neck Cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2002, 53, 1192–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kuwai, T.; Kitadai, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Onogawa, S.; Matsutani, N.; Kaio, E.; Ito, M.; Chayama, K. Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha is Associated with Tumor Vascularization in Human Colorectal Carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2003, 105, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sivrid, S.E.; Giatromanolaki, A.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L.; Koukourakis, M.I. Association of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors 1 and 2 with Activated Angiogenic Pathways and Prognosis in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma. Cancer 2002, 95, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tuder, R.M.; Chacon, M.; Alger, L.; Wang, J.; Taraseviciene-Stewart, L.; Kasahara, Y.; Cool, C.D.; Bishop, A.E.; Geraci, M.; Semenza, G.L.; et al. Expression of Angiogenesis-Related Molecules in Plexiform Lesion in Severe Pulmonary Hypertension: Evidence for a Process of Disordered Angiogenesis. J. Pathol. 2001, 195, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zagzag, D.; Zhang, H.; Scalzitti, J.M.; Laughner, E.; Simons, J.W.; Semenza, G.L. Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 in Brain Tumors: Association with Angiogenesis, Invasion, and Prognosis. Cancer 2000, 88, 2606–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Talwar, H.; Bouhamdan, M.; Bauerfeld, C.; Talreja, J.; Aoidi, R.; Houde, N.; Charron, J.; Samavati, L. MEK2 Negatively Regulates Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated IL-1β Production through HIF-1α Expression. J. Immunol. 2019, 202, 1815–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Knight, M.; Stanley, S. HIF-1α as a Central Mediator of Cellular Resistance to Intracellular Pathogens. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2019, 60, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sun, R.; Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Sun, F.; Man, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yin, L.; Pu, Y. Overexpression of HIF-1a Could Partially Protect K562 Cells from 1,4-Benzoquinone Induced Toxicity by Inhibiting ROS, Apoptosis and Enhancing Glycolysis. Toxicol. In Vitro 2019, 55, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Muz, B.; de la Puente, P.; Azab, F.; Azab, A.K. The Role of Hypoxia in Cancer Progression, Angiogenesis, Metastasis, and Resistance to Therapy. Hypoxia 2015, 3, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Dunn, T. Oxygen and Cancer. N. C. Med. J. 1997, 58, 140–143. [Google Scholar]
  57. Semenza, G.L. Targeting HIF-1 for Cancer Therapy. Nat. Rev. 2003, 3, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Semenza, G.L. Defining the Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 in Cancer Biology and Therapeutics. Oncogene 2010, 29, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kallio, P.J.; Wilson, W.J.; O’Brien, S.; Makino, Y.; Poellinger, L. Regulation of the Hypoxia-Inducible Transcription Factor 1alpha by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 6519–6525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cao, D.; Hou, M.; Guan, Y.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Y.; Gou, H. Expression of HIF-1alpha and VEGF in Colorectal Cancer: Association with Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Implications. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ferrara, N.; Davis-Smyth, T. The Biology of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Endocr. Rev. 1997, 18, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Goel, H.L.; Mercurio, A.M. VEGF Targets the Tumour Cell. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Liang, X.; Yang, D.; Hu, J.; Hao, X.; Gao, J.; Mao, Z. Hypoxia Inducible Factor-alpha Expression Correlates with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression and Lymphangiogenesis/Angiogenesis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28, 1659–1666. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Semenza, G.L. Molecular Mechanisms Mediating Metastasis of Hypoxic Breast Cancer Cells. Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Depping, R.; Jelkmann, W.; Kosyna, F.K. Nuclear-Cytoplasmatic Shuttling of Proteins in Control of Cellular Oxygen Sensing. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 93, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Baba, Y.; Nosho, K.; Shima, K.; Irahara, N.; Chan, A.T.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Chung, D.C.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Fuchs, C.S.; Ogino, S. HIF1A Overexpression Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in a Cohort of 731 Colorectal Cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 176, 2292–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shin, J.I.; Lim, H.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Seung, B.J.; Sur, J.H. Analysis of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Expression Relative to Other Key Factors in Malignant Canine Mammary Tumours. J. Comp. Pathol. 2015, 153, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Stoeltzing, O.; McCarty, M.F.; Wey, J.S.; Fan, F.; Liu, W.; Belcheva, A.; Bucana, C.D.; Semenza, G.L.; Ellis, L.M. Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1alpha in Gastric Cancer Cell Growth, Angiogenesis, and Vessel Maturation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004, 96, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cuninghame, S.; Jackson, R.; Zehbe, I. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 and Its Role in Viral Carcinogenesis. Virology 2014, 456–457, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Li, G.; He, L.; Zhang, E.; Shi, J.; Zhang, Q.; Le, A.D.; Zhou, K.; Tang, X. Overexpression of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Type 16 Oncoproteins Promotes Angiogenesis via Enhancing HIF-1a and VEGF Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Cancer Lett. 2011, 311, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nakamura, M.; Bodily, J.M.; Beglin, M.; Kyo, S.; Inoue, M.; Laimins, L.A. Hypoxia-Specific Stabilization of HIF-1alpha by Human Papillomaviruses. Virology 2009, 387, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Bischof, O.; Nacerddine, K.; Dejean, A. Human Papillomavirus Oncoprotein E7 Targets the Promyelocytic Leukemia Protein and Circumvents Cellular Senescence via the Rb and p53 Tumor Suppressor Pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Knuth, J.; Sharma, S.J.; Würdemann, N.; Holler, C.; Garvalov, B.K.; Acker, T.; Wittekindt, C.; Wagner, S.; Klussmann, J.P. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Activation in HPV-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 89681–89691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Araldi, R.P.; Assaf, S.M.R.; Carvalho, R.F.; Carvalho, M.A.C.R.; Souza, J.M.; Magnelli, R.F.; Módolo, D.G.; Roperto, F.P.; Stocco, R.C.; Beçak, W. Papillomaviruses: A Systematic Review. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2017, 40, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Ayako, N.; Minoru, K.; Sho, K.; Christalle, C.T.C.; Hiroshi, H. HIF-1-Dependent Reprogramming of Glucose Metabolic Pathway of Cancer Cells and Its Therapeutic Significance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Albadari, N.; Deng, S.; Li, W. The Transcriptional Factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and Their Novel Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 667–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Equine normal skin. HIF-1α immunohistochemical staining. Expression in the basal epidermal cells (arrow) (40×). Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 1. Equine normal skin. HIF-1α immunohistochemical staining. Expression in the basal epidermal cells (arrow) (40×). Scale bar: 100 μm.
Pathogens 09 00058 g001
Figure 2. Equine sarcoid. HIF-1α immunohistochemical staining. (a) Strong immunohistochemical expression in sarcoid fibroblasts (arrow) (score 3; ++; 40×; Scale bar: 100 μm). (b) Moderate immunohistochemical expression in sarcoid fibroblasts (arrow) (score 2; +; 20×; Scale bar: 100 μm).
Figure 2. Equine sarcoid. HIF-1α immunohistochemical staining. (a) Strong immunohistochemical expression in sarcoid fibroblasts (arrow) (score 3; ++; 40×; Scale bar: 100 μm). (b) Moderate immunohistochemical expression in sarcoid fibroblasts (arrow) (score 2; +; 20×; Scale bar: 100 μm).
Pathogens 09 00058 g002
Figure 3. (A) Western blotting analysis showing overexpression of HIF-1α in equine sarcoids (S) compared to normal skin samples (N). Whole cell lysate from Hela cells and K562 cells was run concomitantly to ensure the specificity of the band. Blot was stripped and incubated with anti-β-actin antibody to perform normalization. (B) Densitometric analysis was performed with the results expressed as HIF-1α/actin ratio.
Figure 3. (A) Western blotting analysis showing overexpression of HIF-1α in equine sarcoids (S) compared to normal skin samples (N). Whole cell lysate from Hela cells and K562 cells was run concomitantly to ensure the specificity of the band. Blot was stripped and incubated with anti-β-actin antibody to perform normalization. (B) Densitometric analysis was performed with the results expressed as HIF-1α/actin ratio.
Pathogens 09 00058 g003
Table 1. Immunoreactivity scoring of HIF-1α in 35 equine sarcoids.
Table 1. Immunoreactivity scoring of HIF-1α in 35 equine sarcoids.
LocationNumber of CasesStaining Intensity Score *Percentage Positive Score **
Neck2++3
Limb9++3
1+2
Abdomen4++3
2+2
Pectoral region5++3
3+2
Head5++3
1+2
Paragenital3++3
* Staining intensity score: + moderate immunolabelling, and ++ strong immunolabelling. ** Percentage positive score: 0 (≤10% positive cells), 1 (10–40% positive cells), 2 (40–60% positive cells), and 3 (>60% positive cells).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martano, M.; Altamura, G.; Power, K.; Restucci, B.; Carella, F.; Borzacchiello, G.; Maiolino, P. Evaluation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) in Equine Sarcoid: An Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Study. Pathogens 2020, 9, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010058

AMA Style

Martano M, Altamura G, Power K, Restucci B, Carella F, Borzacchiello G, Maiolino P. Evaluation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) in Equine Sarcoid: An Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Study. Pathogens. 2020; 9(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martano, Manuela, Gennaro Altamura, Karen Power, Brunella Restucci, Francesca Carella, Giuseppe Borzacchiello, and Paola Maiolino. 2020. "Evaluation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Alpha (HIF-1α) in Equine Sarcoid: An Immunohistochemical and Biochemical Study" Pathogens 9, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop