Next Article in Journal
Microscopic and Molecular Tracing of Cryptosporidium Oocysts: Identifying a Possible Reservoir of Infection in Red Grouse
Next Article in Special Issue
Longitudinal Surveillance of Porcine Rotavirus B Strains from the United States and Canada and In Silico Identification of Antigenically Important Sites
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Cytoplasmic mRNA Cap-Binding Protein Complexes in Trypanosoma brucei and Other Trypanosomatids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Avian Group D Rotaviruses: Structure, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Perspectives on Future Research Challenges

Italian Physicians’ Opinions on Rotavirus Vaccine Implementation

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
Department of Pediatrics, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2017, 6(4), 56;
Received: 18 September 2017 / Revised: 27 October 2017 / Accepted: 31 October 2017 / Published: 3 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rotavirus Epidemiology: Host, Climate and Vaccine Influences)
Rotavirus (RV) infection is the main cause of severe acute gastroenteritis (GE) in the pediatric population and has a major impact in both developing and industrialized countries. The reduction of severe RVGE cases, followed by death or hospitalization, is considered the main benefit of RV vaccination, even though its implementation often faces obstacles. In Italy, the recently approved National Immunization Plan aims to overcome the differences among regions, offering a universal free RV vaccination. The aim of the study was to evaluate the opinions on benefit and acceptability of RV vaccination related to the perception of the burden of RV disease. Data were collected from 108 physicians in 2015 by a questionnaire consisting of 12 questions; some answers were compared with those obtained with a similar tool in 2011. The majority of respondents (76.2%) was convinced of the benefit of the vaccine and 57.4% recommended it routinely, but more than half indicated a <25% adherence to RV vaccination among their patients. As the main reasons of vaccine refusal, skepticism about the vaccine (60.4%) and its cost (34.1%) were indicated. Our data confirm that more information and counselling are needed to increase RV vaccine coverage. View Full-Text
Keywords: rotavirus; new vaccines; immunization; coverage; physicians; knowledge; attitudes; beliefs; intentions rotavirus; new vaccines; immunization; coverage; physicians; knowledge; attitudes; beliefs; intentions
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mita, V.; Arigliani, M.; Zaratti, L.; Arigliani, R.; Franco, E. Italian Physicians’ Opinions on Rotavirus Vaccine Implementation. Pathogens 2017, 6, 56.

AMA Style

Mita V, Arigliani M, Zaratti L, Arigliani R, Franco E. Italian Physicians’ Opinions on Rotavirus Vaccine Implementation. Pathogens. 2017; 6(4):56.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mita, Valentin, Michele Arigliani, Laura Zaratti, Raffaele Arigliani, and Elisabetta Franco. 2017. "Italian Physicians’ Opinions on Rotavirus Vaccine Implementation" Pathogens 6, no. 4: 56.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop