Hydration Behavior and Environmental–Economic Performance of Portland Cement Incorporating Particle Board Waste Sludge
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Materials
2.1.1. Cement
2.1.2. Characteristics of PBWS
2.1.3. Pre-Treatment of PBWS
2.2. Mixture Design and Sample Preparation
- XRD analysis: powdered material prepared from cured paste samples;
- FT-IR analysis: finely ground powder obtained from cured paste samples;
- TG/DTG analysis: representative powdered portions taken from cured paste samples.
2.3. Analytical Methods
2.3.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
2.3.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR)
2.3.3. Thermogravimetric/Differential Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG/DTG)
2.3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM/EDS)
2.3.5. X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Chemical Analysis Results
3.2. Phase Analysis
3.2.1. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis
7-Day Hydration
28-Day Hydration
90-Day Hydration
3.2.2. FT-IR Analysis
3.2.3. TG/DTG Analysis
3.3. Environmental and Economic Evaluations
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1. Hydration Products and Phase Development
4.2. Sustainability Implications
- The greatest reduction was obtained at 20% replacement, where the calculated values decreased to 2654 MJ/t, 706.77 kg/t, and 2867.16 TL/t, respectively.
4.3. Recommendations
- Based on the overall findings, low-to-moderate PBWS replacement levels, particularly 5% and 10%, are recommended as more suitable ranges for achieving a balanced performance.
- Higher replacement level (20%) provided greater environmental benefit, but also showed more evident limitations in hydration-related development and strength performance.
- Future studies should focus on long-term durability performance, including sulfate resistance, chloride penetration, water transport behavior, and freeze–thaw resistance.
- Additional research on pretreatment or activation methods may help improve PBWS reactivity and enable the use of higher replacement ratios without compromising performance.
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schiller, G.; Roscher, J. Impact of urbanization on construction material consumption: A global analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2023, 27, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bide, T.; Novellino, A.; Petavratzi, E.; Watson, C.S. A bottom-up building stock quantification methodology for construction minerals using Earth Observation. The case of Hanoi, Clean. Environ. Syst. 2023, 8, 100109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobiszewska, M.; Bagcal, O.; Beycioğlu, A.; Goulias, D.; Köksal, F.; Płomiński, B.; Ürünveren, H. Utilization of rock dust as cement replacement in cement composites: An alternative approach to sustainable mortar and concrete productions. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 69, 106180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeyad, A.M. Sustainable concrete Production: Incorporating recycled wastewater as a green building material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 407, 133522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özkan, Ş. The impact of ternary hybrid fibers on the mechanical characteristics of cement-based composites with waste andesite dust substitution. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 88, 109102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 5.2 Concrete and Cement. Available online: https://www.cementl.com/what-is-opc-cement-ordinary-portland-cement-explained-simply/ (accessed on 13 August 2025).
- Unlocking Global Cement and Concrete Decarbonization—RMI. Available online: https://rmi.org/unlocking-global-cement-and-concrete-decarbonization (accessed on 13 August 2025).
- CEMBUREAU. CEMBUREAU Activity Report 2024; CEMBUREAU: Brussels, Belgium, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Khaiyum, M.Z.; Sarker, S.; Kabir, G. Evaluation of Carbon Emission Factors in the Cement Industry: An Emerging Economy Context. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Supriya; Chaudhury, R.; Sharma, U.; Thapliyal, P.C.; Singh, L.P. Low-CO2 emission strategies to achieve net zero target in cement sector. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 417, 137466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cement Demand Forecast 2050. Available online: https://www.globalcement.com/magazine/articles/1368-cement-demand-forecast-2050 (accessed on 13 August 2025).
- Li, H.; Liu, F.; Pan, Z.; Li, H.; Wu, Z.; Li, L.; Xiong, Z. Use of supplementary cementitious materials in seawater–sea sand concrete: State-of-the-art review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 425, 136009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, K.A.; Cunningham, P.R.; Miller, S.A. Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 139, 105049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gou, J.; Li, S.; Jiang, C.; Li, Z.; You, G. A Study on the Influence of Gypsum and Ca(OH)2 on the Mechanical Properties and Hydration Behavior of Multi-Component Solid Waste-Based Cementitious Materials. Materials 2025, 18, 1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, W.; Lv, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, J.X.; Moon, J.; Zou, F.; Tian, W.; Poon, C.S. Understanding the role of C-S-H seeds and sulfate in the lightweight cementitious composites containing fly ash cenospheres. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025, 162, 106150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.S.; Lin, R.S.; Wang, X.Y. Semi-wet CO2 mineralized modified wollastonite: Application in high-early strength cement and comparative analysis with common supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025, 164, 106254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tushar, Q.; Bhuyian, M.; Abunada, Z.; Lemckert, C.; Giustozzi, F. Sustainability of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration (Mswi) Ash in Concrete with Plasticiser: A Life Cycle Assessment; SSRN: New York, NY, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, L.; Jiang, Y.; Ban, J.; Shen, Y.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, P.; Poon, C.S. Mechanism underlying early hydration kinetics of carbonated recycled concrete fines-ordinary portland cement (CRCF-OPC) paste. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 144, 105275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Burris, L.; Shearer, C.R.; Hooton, D.; Suraneni, P. Strength activity index and bulk resistivity index modifications that differentiate inert and reactive materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 124, 104240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jhatial, A.A.; Nováková, I.; Gjerløw, E. A Review on Emerging Cementitious Materials, Reactivity Evaluation and Treatment Methods. Buildings 2023, 13, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tuncer, M.İ.; Başyiğit, C.; Davraz, M. The effect of sewage sludge ash as a mineral admixture on concrete strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 475, 141102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shyamala, G.; Hemalatha, B.; Gunavathie, M.A.; Ezhil, S.S.; Sathya, V.; Gobinath, M.; Babu, M.D. Evaluation of Paper Industry waste sludge and nano materials on properties of concrete. E3S Web Conf. 2025, 621, 01018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.K.; Khare, A. Study and Analysis of Paper Waste Sludge in Cement by Mixing Varied Ratios. BIMS Int. Res. J. Manag. Commer. 2025, 10, 103–116. [Google Scholar]
- Gharieb, M.; Rashad, A.M. A Pioneer Investigation on Recycling Ceramic Sludge Waste into Alkali-Activated Slag Cement. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2025, 51, 4523–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saran, R.; Saxena, S.; Acharya, H.; Bhadane, P.; Taki, K. Utilization of Water Treatment Plant Sludge for Creating Green Bricks and Examining Its Gamma Radiation Shielding Potential. J. Hazard. Toxic Radioact. Waste 2025, 29, 04025009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, D.; Pal, P.; Prakash, A. Utilization of waste sludge in cementitious Matrix: A feasibility study. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 65, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ataabadi, H.S.; Zhuge, Y.; Liu, Y. Recycling of industrial sludge as construction materials. Wastes Low-Carbon Constr. Mater. 2025, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravikumar, B.S.; Chandra, H.S.S.; Surendra, H.J. Waste paper sludge ash as a pozzolanic material: Enhancing concrete performance and sustainability. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2025, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jwaida, Z.; Dulaimi, A.; Alyhya, W.; Algretawee, H.; Al-Busaltan, S. Recycling and utilization of paper sludge ash-current status review and future perspectives. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2024, 40, e00960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parlikar, A.; Naik, C.; Nayak, C.B. An experimental study on effect of pharmaceutical industrial waste water on compressive strength of concrete. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2021, 10, 11068–11072. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.B. Incorporating Wastewater Sludge as a Cement Alternative in Repair Mortar: An Experimental Study of Material Properties. Materials 2024, 17, 5625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tay, J.; Show, K.-Y. Municipal Wastewater Sludge as Cementitious and Blended Cement Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1994, 16, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.L.; Lo, K.W.; Hung, M.J.; Cheng, T.W.; Chang, Y.M. Recycling of spent catalyst and waste sludge from industry to substitute raw materials in the preparation of Portland cement clinker. Sustain. Environ. Res. 2017, 27, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meda, S.R.; Sharma, S.K.; Tyagi, G.D. Utilization of Waste Sludge as a Construction Material -A Review. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 4195–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, J.; Vyas, C.M.; Pitroda, J. A Critical Literature review on Effective Utilization of Kota Stone Sludge as Replacement of Marble Slurry Wastes in Brick. Int. J. Trend Res. Dev. 2016, 3, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Z.; Long, G.; Zhou, J.L.; Ma, C. Valorization of sewage sludge in the fabrication of construction and building materials: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 154, 104606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ağaç ve Orman Ürünleri Sektör Analizi—Kolay İhracat Platformu. Available online: https://www.kolayihracat.gov.tr/sektorler/agac-mamulleri-ve-orman-urunleri (accessed on 14 August 2025).
- Yel, H.; Urun, E.; Yel, H.; Urun, E. Performance of cement-bonded wood particleboards produced using fly ash and spruce planer shavings. Maderas. Cienc. Tecnol. 2022, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, I.O.E.; Davies, O.O.A. Agro-waste-cement particleboards: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 2, 10–26. [Google Scholar]
- Yilmaz, M.; Tokyay, M.; Yaman, I.O. Cement production by cement-bonded wood particleboard wastes. Adv. Cem. Res. 2016, 28, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argalis, P.P.; Sinka, M.; Bajare, D. Recycling of Cement–Wood Board Production Waste into a Low-Strength Cementitious Binder. Recycling 2022, 7, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, F.; Jamal, A.; Iqbal, M.; Alqurashi, M.; Almoshaogeh, M.; Al-Ahmadi, H.M.; Hussein, E.E. Performance Evaluation of Cementitious Composites Incorporating Nano Graphite Platelets as Additive Carbon Material. Materials 2021, 15, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BS EN 933-1:2012; Tests for Geometrical Properties of Aggregates—Determination of Particle Size Distribution. Sieving Method. BSI Knowledge: London, UK, 2012.
- ASTM C618-22; Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Hasanin, T.H.A.; Alsahli, S.A.; Altaleb, H.A.; Alshammari, B.H.; Tantawy, M.A. Hydration characteristics of cement blended with thermally reactivated recycled concrete demolition waste. Sci. Rep. 2025, 16, 1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moolchandani, K.; Sharma, A. Morphological and microstructural analysis of sustainable concrete with crumb rubber and SCMs. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2025, 64, 20250130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Dalconi, M.C.; Bellotto, P.; Valentini, L.; Molinari, S.; Yuan, X.; Wang, D.; Hu, W.; Chen, Q.; Fernandez-Martinez, A.; et al. Pb-induced retardation of early hydration of Portland cement: Insights from in-situ XRD and implications for substitution with industrial by-products. Cem. Concr. Res. 2025, 193, 107867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Y.; Chu, H.; Zhang, W. Sustainable seawater-sea sand cement mortar with municipal solid waste incineration ash: Mechanical performance, microstructure, and environmental benefits. Results Eng. 2025, 27, 106839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Matos, P.R.; Neto, J.S.A.; Campos, C.E.M. Is the R index accurate to assess the preferred orientation of portlandite in cement pastes? Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wu, K.; Shen, P. Microstructural Evolution of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Cement during the Wet-Carbonation Process. Buildings 2024, 14, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzielová, E.; Slaný, M.; Žemlička, M.; Másilko, J.; Palou, M.T. Phase Composition of Silica Fume—Portland Cement Systems Formed under Hydrothermal Curing Evaluated by FTIR, XRD, and TGA. Materials 2021, 14, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusuf, M.O. Bond Characterization in Cementitious Material Binders Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashyap, V.S.; Agrawal, U.; Arora, K.; Sancheti, G. FTIR Analysis of Nanomodified Cement Concrete Incorporating Nano Silica and Waste Marble Dust. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 796, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Liu, F.; Zhen, H.; Xiong, Z.; Song, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, L. Evaluating strength, hydration characteristics, microstructure evolution, and sustainability of seawater–sea sand cement-based materials containing iron ore tailings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 457, 139163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Zhu, H.; Shah, K.W.; Dong, Z.; Wu, J. Performance evaluation and microstructure characterization of seawater and coral/sea sand alkali-activated mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 259, 120403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoyos-Montilla, A.A.; Puertas, F.; Mosquera, J.M.; Tobón, J.I. Infrared spectra experimental analyses on alkali-activated fly ash-based binders. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 269, 120698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scholtzová, E.; Kucková, L.; Kožíšek, J.; Tunega, D. Structural and spectroscopic characterization of ettringite mineral–combined DFT and experimental study. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1100, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frost, R.L.; López, A.; Xi, Y.; Scholz, R.; Da Costa, G.M.; Lima, R.M.F.; Granja, A. The spectroscopic characterization of the sulphate mineral ettringite from Kuruman manganese deposits, South Africa. Vib. Spectrosc. 2013, 68, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Szudek, W.; Szydłowski, J.; Buchała, I.; Kapeluszna, E. Synthesis and Characterization of Calcium Sulfoaluminate Hydrates—Ettringite (AFt) and Monosulfate (AFm). Materials 2024, 17, 5216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vanoutrive, H.; Minne, P.; Van de Voorde, I.; Cizer, Ö.; Gruyaert, E. Carbonation of cement paste with GGBFS: Effect of curing duration, replacement level and CO2 concentration on the reaction products and CO2 buffer capacity. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 129, 104449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ylmén, R.; Jäglid, U. Carbonation of Portland Cement Studied by Diffuse Reflection Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2013, 7, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, H.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, M. Hydration kinetics, microstructure and physicochemical performance of metakaolin-blended cementitious composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 408, 133756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuschlag, P.; Machner, A. Hydration of Composite Cements Containing Novel SCMs. Nord. Concr. Res. 2024, 70, 77–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gholizadeh-Vayghan, A.; Hernandez, G.M.; Kingne, F.K.; Gu, J.; Dilissen, N.; El Kadi, M.; Tysmans, T.; Vleugels, J.; Rahier, H.; Snellings, R. Thermal Reactivation of Hydrated Cement Paste: Properties and Impact on Cement Hydration. Materials 2024, 17, 2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaseen, N.; Alcivar-Bastidas, S.; Irfan-ul-Hassan, M.; Petroche, D.M.; Qazi, A.U.; Ramirez, A.D. Concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials: Temporal evolution of compressive strength and environmental life cycle assessment. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radwan, M.K.H.; Athar, F.A.; Yeo, J.S.; Alnahhal, A.M.; Ghayeb, H.H.; Cheah, C.B.; Mo, K.H. Comprehensive evaluation on the properties of blended cement containing calcined paper sludge. Mater. Struct. Constr. 2025, 58, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X.; Luo, W.; Ren, P.; Wan, Z. Performance of sustainable ternary blended cement containing municipal solid waste incineration fly ash coupled with slag, coal fly ash or metakaolin. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 82, 108301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Yu, K.; He, C.; Gao, L.; Yang, H.; He, H.; Zhong, A.N. Research progress on the application of low-reactivity minerals in carbonation-cured cement-based materials. J. CO2 Util. 2024, 88, 102938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, K.K.; Wu, X.; Noh, G.; Lee, J.H.; Jang, J.G. Effect of acid attack coupled with elevated temperatures on carbonation-cured calcium sulfoaluminate and ordinary Portland cement paste. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2025, 23, e05150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A. Assessing the effects of supplementary cementitious materials on concrete properties: A review. Discov. Civ. Eng. 2024, 1, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Ye, G. The role of water-treated municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash in microstructure formation and strength development of blended cement pastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2024, 178, 107440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torabi, M.; Taylor, P.C. Hydration of portland cement and slag cement mixtures with insights on AFm phases and reaction mechanism. CEMENT 2025, 21, 100155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Wang, R.; Wei, M.; Lei, N.; Wei, T.; Liu, F. Characteristics of carbide-slag-activated GGBS–fly ash materials: Strength, hydration mechanism, microstructure, and sustainability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 422, 135796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| SiO2 (S) | Al2O3 (A) | Fe2O3 (F) | CaO | MgO | SO3 | K2O | Na2O | Cr2O3 | Mn2O3 | P2O5 | TiO2 | LOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 18.95 | 4.69 | 3.80 | 62.89 | 2.24 | 2.86 | 0.79 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 2.96 |
| PBWS | 23.65 | 5.17 | 2.99 | 45.46 | 3.58 | 0.17 | 1.47 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 16.40 |
| Mix Code | Water (g) | Cement (g) | PBWS (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 225 | 450 | 0 |
| PBWS5 | 225 | 427.5 | 22.5 |
| PBWS10 | 225 | 405 | 45 |
| PBWS20 | 225 | 360 | 90 |
| Materials | PC | PBWS | PBWS5 | PBWS10 | PBWS20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 18.95 | 23.65 | 28.34 | 27.77 | 27.13 |
| Al2O3 | 4.69 | 5.17 | 6.94 | 6.89 | 6.64 |
| Fe2O3 | 3.80 | 2.99 | 3.52 | 3.57 | 3.50 |
| CaO | 62.89 | 45.46 | 47.38 | 47.16 | 47.49 |
| MgO | 2.24 | 3.58 | 2.27 | 2.39 | 2.52 |
| SO3 | 2.86 | 0.17 | 2.64 | 2.65 | 2.28 |
| K2O | 0.79 | 1.47 | 1.86 | 1.89 | 1.83 |
| Na2O | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| Cr2O3 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Mn2O3 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| P2O5 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.24 |
| TiO2 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| a LOI | 2.96 | 16.40 | 5.79 | 6.47 | 7.38 |
| Material | Drying Time (h) | Average Power (kW) | Output (t) | Energy (MJ/t) | CO2 Emission (kg/t) a | Production Cost (₺/t) b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBWS (dried) | 24 | 0.8 | 1 | 69.12 | 8.64 | 57.37 |
| Material | Energy Intensity (MJ/t) | CO2 Emission (kg/t) | Production Cost (TL/t) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 3300 a | 830 b | 3400 |
| PBWS | 125.67 | 15.43 | 104.31 |
| Mortar Type | Energy Intensity (MJ/t) | CO2 Emission (kg/t) | Production Cost (TL/t) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 3300.00 | 830.00 | 3400.00 |
| PBWS5 | 3138.50 | 799.19 | 3266.79 |
| PBWS10 | 2977.00 | 768.38 | 3133.58 |
| PBWS20 | 2654.00 | 706.77 | 2867.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Özkan, Ş. Hydration Behavior and Environmental–Economic Performance of Portland Cement Incorporating Particle Board Waste Sludge. Buildings 2026, 16, 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081496
Özkan Ş. Hydration Behavior and Environmental–Economic Performance of Portland Cement Incorporating Particle Board Waste Sludge. Buildings. 2026; 16(8):1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081496
Chicago/Turabian StyleÖzkan, Şükrü. 2026. "Hydration Behavior and Environmental–Economic Performance of Portland Cement Incorporating Particle Board Waste Sludge" Buildings 16, no. 8: 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081496
APA StyleÖzkan, Ş. (2026). Hydration Behavior and Environmental–Economic Performance of Portland Cement Incorporating Particle Board Waste Sludge. Buildings, 16(8), 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081496

