Explaining Older Adults’ Continuance Intention Toward Smart Homes: Integrating the Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems and the Technology Acceptance Model
Abstract
1. Introduction
- To identify the key factors influencing older adults’ continuance intention to use smart homes in Shandong Province, China.
- To examine the relationships between the key factors and older adults’ continuance intention to use smart homes in Shandong Province, China.
- To develop a conceptual framework for older adults’ continuance intention to use smart homes in Shandong Province, China.
2. Literature Review
2.1. Older Adults’ Acceptance of Smart Homes
2.2. Conceptual Framework and Hypothesis Development
2.2.1. Expectation-Confirmation Model of Information Systems
2.2.2. Technology Acceptance Model
2.2.3. China-Specific Contextual Antecedents
2.2.4. Conceptual Framework
2.2.5. Hypotheses Development
Direct-Effect Hypotheses on Continuance Intention
Mechanism-Linking Hypotheses Supporting Continuance Intention
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Geographic Context of the Study
3.2. Research Method
3.3. Measures and Instruments
3.4. Sampling Technique
3.5. Respondent
3.6. Sample Size
3.7. Data Collection
3.8. Analysis Instruments
3.9. Pilot Study
4. Data Analysis and Results
4.1. Demographic Information
4.2. Common Method Bias (CMB) Testing
4.3. PLS-SEM Analysis
4.3.1. Measurement Model Analysis
4.3.2. Structural Model Analysis
4.4. Importance-Performance Map Analysis (IPMA)
5. Discussion
5.1. Discussion of Direct Paths to Continuance Intention
5.2. Discussion of Mechanism Paths
5.3. Discussion of Non-Supported Paths
6. Contributions, Implications, and Limitations
6.1. Theoretical Contributions
6.2. Practical and Policy Implications
6.2.1. Government-Level Policy Implications
6.2.2. Organizational-Level Implementation Implications for Smart Home Providers
6.2.3. Community- and Family-Level Support Implications
6.2.4. User-Level Implications for Older Adults
6.3. Limitations and Recommendations for Future Research
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AVE | Average variance extracted |
| CI | Continuance intention |
| CNF | Confirmation |
| COM | Compatibility |
| CR | Composite reliability |
| CS | Cost |
| ECT | Expectation–confirmation theory |
| ECM-IS | Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems |
| GoF | Goodness of fit |
| GP | Government policy |
| HTMT | Heterotrait–monotrait ratio |
| IPMA | Importance–performance matrix analysis |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| ITS | Intergenerational technical support |
| PEOU | Perceived ease of use |
| PLS-SEM | Partial least squares structural equation modeling |
| PU | Perceived usefulness |
| SAT | Satisfaction |
| SEM | Structural equation modeling |
| SRMR | Standardized root mean square residual |
| TAM | Technology Acceptance Model |
| TRA | Theory of Reasoned Action |
| UTAUT | Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology |
| VIF | Variance inflation factor |
References
- Taieb-Maimon, M.; Vaisman-Fairstein, E. Improving Older Adults’ Accessibility to the Web Using Real-Time Online Interactive Guides. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2022, 164, 102830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Bureau of Statistics of China. Bulletin of the Seventh National Census (No. 5). Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/202302/t20230206_1902005.html (accessed on 17 February 2024).
- Cristea, M.; Noja, G.G.; Stefea, P.; Sala, A.L. The Impact of Population Aging and Public Health Support on EU Labor Markets. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marois, G.; Bélanger, A.; Lutz, W. Population Aging, Migration, and Productivity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7690–7695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colnar, S.; Dimovski, V.; Grah, B.; Rogelj, V.; Bogataj, D. Smart Home Supporting Integrated Health and Care Services for Older Adults in the Community: Literature Review and Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 2020 24th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania, 8–10 October 2020; pp. 526–531. [Google Scholar]
- Maswadi, K.; Ghani, N.B.A.; Hamid, S.B. Systematic Literature Review of Smart Home Monitoring Technologies Based on IoT for the Elderly. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 92244–92261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Response to Proposals No. 6297 and 4799 at the First Session of the 14th National People’s Congress. 2023. Available online: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/jianyitianfuwen/qgrddbjyfwgk/202401/t20240126_1363734.html (accessed on 9 February 2025).
- Balta-Ozkan, N.; Boteler, B.; Amerighi, O. European Smart Home Market Development: Public Views on Technical and Economic Aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, D.; Funilkul, S.; Vanijja, V.; Papasratorn, B. Analyzing the Elderly Users’ Adoption of Smart-Home Services. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 51238–51252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Silva, L.C.; Morikawa, C.; Petra, I.M. State of the Art of Smart Homes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2012, 25, 1313–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junestrand, S.; Tollmar, K. Video Mediated Communication for Domestic Environments: Architectural and Technological Design. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings—Integrating Information, Organizations and Architecture (CoBuild 99), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1–2 October 1999; pp. 177–190. [Google Scholar]
- Choukou, M.-A.; Syed-Abdul, S. Smart Home Technologies and Services for Geriatric Rehabilitation; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; p. 256. [Google Scholar]
- Dermody, G.; Fritz, R.; Glass, C.; Dunham, M.; Whitehead, L. Factors Influencing Community-dwelling Older Adults’ Readiness to Adopt Smart Home Technology: A Qualitative Exploratory Study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021, 77, 4847–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, Y.K.; Wang, Z.Y.; Cho, J.Y. Global Research Trends on Smart Homes for Older Adults: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analyses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Standardization and Improvement of Smart Technologies, Reshaping Lifestyle—Smart Home, Lighting up E-Life. 2020. Available online: https://wap.miit.gov.cn/ztzl/rdzt/gytxyfgfcgz/mtbd/art/2020/art_d98c7787b7bc4337bae531236dd2ef09.html (accessed on 9 February 2025).
- Xinhua News Agency. Three Ministries Increase Efforts to Promote Smart Health and Elderly Care Products and Services. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. 2022. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-11/23/content_5728492.htm (accessed on 9 February 2025).
- Ministry of Industry and Information Technology; Ministry of Civil Affairs; National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on Organizing the Application Process for the 2022 Smart Health and Elderly Care Products and Services Promotion Catalogue. 2022. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-11/23/content_5728383.htm (accessed on 9 February 2025).
- Schak, M.; Blum, R.; Bomsdorf, B. Smart Home for the Elderly—A Survey of Desires, Needs, and Problems. In Proceedings of the Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, Technology in Everyday Living, Part II, Virtual Event, 26 June–1 July 2022; pp. 107–121. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, F.Y.; Sheng, L.; Gu, Z.Y. Investigating the Integration and the Long-Term Use of Smart Speakers in Older Adults’ Daily Practices: Qualitative Study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2024, 12, e47472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huajing Intelligence Network. Industry Segmentation, Key Policies, and Value-Chain Analysis of Smart Home Devices for Older Adults in China (2025). Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1849558627781723489&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on 6 February 2026).
- Xian, X. 100 “Smart Home” Products Bought for Parents Are Now Collecting Dust: Why Does Age-Tech Keep Missing the Mark? Available online: https://c.m.163.com/news/a/K58LUM6E055613WL.html (accessed on 6 February 2026).
- Wang, M.X.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, J.K. Investigating the Determinants of IoT Device Continuance Intentions: An Empirical Study of Smart Speakers Through the Lens of Expectation-Confirmation Theory. SAGE Open 2023, 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Qian, Y.; Kaner, J. A Study on Smart Home Use Intention of Elderly Consumers Based on Technology Acceptance Models. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0300574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.J.; Gong, X.D.; Li, J.; Tian, K.; Xing, K. A Study on Community Older People’s Willingness to Use Smart Home-An Extended Technology Acceptance Model with Intergenerational Relationships. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1139667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, P. The Investigation of Adoption of Voice-User Interface (VUI) in Smart Home Systems among Chinese Older Adults. Sensors 2022, 22, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J.J.K.; Lee, A.S.H. A Conceptual Model on Integration of Technology Acceptance Model on Smart Home Healthcare System among Elderly. In Proceedings of the CTISC 2022–2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communications, Suzhou, China, 22–24 April 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- He, J.P.; Huang, X. The Smartphone Use and Eudaimonic Well-Being of Urban Elderly: Based on Intergenerational Support and TAM. Chin. J. Commun. 2020, 3, 49–73. [Google Scholar]
- Tural, E.; Lu, D.; Austin Cole, D. Safely and Actively Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Attitudes and Intentions Toward Smart Home Technologies. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 7, 23337214211017340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Wu, Y. Smart Home for Elderly Care: Development and Challenges in China. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Ma, Q.; Chan, A.H.S.; Man, S.S. Health Monitoring Through Wearable Technologies for Older Adults: Smart Wearables Acceptance Model. Appl. Ergon. 2019, 75, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elers, P.; Hunter, I.; Whiddett, D.; Lockhart, C.; Guesgen, H.; Singh, A. User Requirements for Technology to Assist Aging in Place: Qualitative Study of Older People and Their Informal Support Networks. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2018, 6, e10741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaportzis, E.; Giatsi Clausen, M.; Gow, A.J. Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meshrige, J.W.; Oladinrin, O.T.; Ojo, L.D. Critical Barriers of Using Smart Home Technologies (SHTs) to the Elderly in Hong Kong. J. Aging Environ. 2023, 37, 219–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Chan, A.H.S.; Chen, K. Personal and Other Factors Affecting Acceptance of Smartphone Technology by Older Chinese Adults. Appl. Ergon. 2016, 54, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sina. Pseudo-Smart, High Cost! From Hype to Abandonment—Who Is “Fleeing” Smart Homes? Available online: https://t.cj.sina.com.cn/articles/view/6777263639/193f4d617020016s2q (accessed on 6 February 2026).
- Nikou, S.; Agahari, W.; Keijzer-Broers, W.; de Reuver, M. Digital Healthcare Technology Adoption by Elderly People: A Capability Approach Model. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 53, 101315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadylak, T.; Cotten, S.R. United States Older Adults’ Willingness to Use Emerging Technologies. Inf. Commun. Soc. 2020, 23, 736–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arar, M.; Jung, C.; Awad, J.; Chohan, A.H. Analysis of Smart Home Technology Acceptance and Preference for Elderly in Dubai, UAE. Designs 2021, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maswadi, K.; Ghani, N.A.; Hamid, S. Factors Influencing the Elderly’s Behavioural Intention to Use Smart Home Technologies in Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0272525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilcullen, S.; Heffernan, E.; Hussey, P.; Lee, H.; Moran, K.; Murphy, C.; Smeaton, A.; Timon, C.; Gallagher, P.; Hopper, L. A Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) Approach to the Qualitative Analysis of Older Adults’ Intentions to Adopt Assistive Smart Home Technology. Gerontechnology 2022, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, R.T.; Ma, M.Y.; Zhou, Y.T.; Lin, Q.X.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, N.J. User Acceptance of Smart Home Voice Assistant: A Comparison Among Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2024, 23, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalayou, M.H.; Endehabtu, B.F.; Tilahun, B. The Applicability of the Modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) on the Sustainable Adoption of eHealth Systems in Resource-Limited Settings. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2020, 13, 1827–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, R.Y.; Li, Y.; Wei, W. Advancing Elderly Healthcare: Adapting UTAUT2 with Inhibitors for Wearable Device Continuance. Libr. Hi Tech 2024, 43, 828–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, M.T.; Blocker, K.A.; Rogers, W.A. Older Adults and Smart Technology: Facilitators and Barriers to Use. Front. Comput. Sci. 2022, 4, 835927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Chan, A.H. Gerontechnology Acceptance by Elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A Senior Technology Acceptance Model (STAM). Ergonomics 2014, 57, 635–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xian, X. All 100 ‘Smart Products’ Bought for My Parents Are Gathering Dust: Why Does Silver-Haired Technology Keep Going off Track? Available online: https://www.jiemian.com/article/13084739.html (accessed on 31 October 2025).
- Cui, J.; Shang, M. Survey Report on Older Adults’ Use of Smart Devices. 2024. Available online: https://epaper.qingdaonews.com/lnshb/html/2025-11/12/content_144543_2816521.htm (accessed on 10 February 2026).
- Peek, S.T.; Wouters, E.J.; van Hoof, J.; Luijkx, K.G.; Boeije, H.R.; Vrijhoef, H.J. Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2014, 83, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation–Confirmation Model. MIS Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayyoub, A.A.M.; Eidah, B.A.A.; Khlaif, Z.N.; El-Shamali, M.A.; Sulaiman, M.R. Understanding Online Assessment Continuance Intention and Individual Performance by Integrating Task-Technology Fit and Expectancy-Confirmation Theory. Heliyon 2023, 9, e22068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacherjee, A. An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents of Electronic Commerce Service Continuance. Decis. Support Syst. 2001, 32, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yen, C.H.; Hsu, M.H.; Chang, C.M. Exploring the Online Bidder’s Repurchase Intention: A Cost and Benefit Perspective. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 2013, 11, 211–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Ellis, T.S. A Study of User Continuance Behavioral Intentions Toward Privacy-Protection Practices. Inf. Resour. Manag. J. 2018, 31, 24–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veeramootoo, N.; Nunkoo, R.; Dwivedi, Y.K. What Determines Success of an E-Government Service? Validation of an Integrative Model of E-Filing Continuance Usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ofosu-Ampong, K. New Policies, New Behaviors: How Digital Taxation Shapes Mobile Money Use in Ghana. Eng. Rep. 2024, 6, e12860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohail, M.; Wang, F.; Archer, N.; Wang, W.T.; Yuan, Y.F. Lower Than Expected but Still Willing to Use: User Acceptance Toward Current Intelligent Conversational Agents. Inf. Manag. 2024, 61, 104033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, W.; Bao, P.; Hao, W.Y.; Kim, J. Empirical Examination of Intention to Continue to Use Smart Home Services. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Gan, L.; Chen, L. An Exploration of Factors Influencing Users’ Continuance Intention of Smart Locks. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 192710–192720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etemad-Sajadi, R.; Gomes Dos Santos, G. Senior Citizens’ Acceptance of Connected Health Technologies in Their Homes. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2019, 32, 1162–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dishaw, M.T.; Strong, D.M. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs. Inf. Manag. 1999, 36, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FakhrHosseini, S.; Chan, K.; Lee, C.; Jeon, M.; Son, H.; Rudnik, J.; Coughlin, J. User Adoption of Intelligent Environments: A Review of Technology Adoption Models, Challenges, and Prospects. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2024, 40, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pal, D.; Vanijja, V. Perceived Usability Evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an Online Learning Platform During COVID-19 Using System Usability Scale and Technology Acceptance Model in India. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020, 119, 105535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafique, H.; Almagrabi, A.O.; Shamim, A.; Anwar, F.; Bashir, A.K. Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Comput. Educ. 2020, 145, 103732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhwaldi, A.F.; Al Eshoush, A.S. Towards A model for Citizens’ Acceptance of E-Payment Systems for Public Sector Services in Jordan: Evidence from Crisis Era. Inf. Sci. Lett. 2022, 11, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lew, S.S.; Tan, G.W.H.; Loh, X.M.; Hew, J.J.; Ooi, K.B. The Disruptive Mobile Wallet in the Hospitality Industry: An Extended Mobile Technology Acceptance Model. Technol. Soc. 2020, 63, 101430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikh, I.M.; Qureshi, M.A.; Noordin, K.; Shaikh, J.M.; Khan, A.; Shahbaz, M.S. Acceptance of Islamic Financial Technology (FinTech) Banking Services by Malaysian Users: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model. Foresight 2020, 22, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.; Choi, N.; Kim, S. Searching for New Model of Digital Informatics for Human-Computer Interaction: Testing the Institution-Based Technology Acceptance Model (ITAM). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhwaldi, A.F.; Abdulmuhsin, A.A. Understanding User Acceptance of IoT Based Healthcare in Jordan: Integration of the TTF and TAM. In Digital Economy, Business Analytics, and Big Data Analytics Applications; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 191–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, S.Y.; Wang, J.; Wei, J.C.; Wang, C.L. An Empirical Study of Consumers’ Intention to Use Ride-Sharing Services: Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Transportation 2020, 47, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y.; Wang, H. Research on the Development of Internet Plus Service for the Aged: Transformation, Integration and New Commercial Activities. J. Tianjin Univ. Adm. 2017, 18, 36–41. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Industry and Information Technology; Ministry of Civil Affairs; National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on the Action Plan for the Development of the Smart Health and Elderly Care Industry (2021–2025). 2021. Available online: https://wap.miit.gov.cn/jgsj/dzs/wjfb/art/2021/art_428233f085e4424499dbb9cde5eaaf37.html (accessed on 21 February 2026).
- Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Analysis Series 8 of the Seventh Census of Zhejiang Province: Population Aging. 2022. Available online: https://tjj.zj.gov.cn/art/2022/7/22/art_1229129214_4956232.html (accessed on 22 February 2024).
- Park, E.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Kwon, S.J. Smart Home Services as the Next Mainstream of the ICT Industry: Determinants of the Adoption of Smart Home Services. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2018, 17, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hargreaves, T.; Wilson, C.; Hauxwell-Baldwin, R. Learning to Live in a Smart Home. Build. Res. Inf. 2018, 46, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, J.; Thompson, H.J.; Joe, J.; Hall, A.; Demiris, G. Examining Korean and Korean American older adults’ perceived acceptability of home-based monitoring technologies in the context of culture. Inform. Health Soc. Care 2017, 42, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowenstein, A.; Daatland, S.O. Filial Norms and Family Support in a Comparative Cross-National Context: Evidence from the OASIS Study. Ageing Soc. 2006, 26, 203–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, C.C.; Lin, J.P. Types of Relations between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types. J. Comp. Fam. Stud. 2009, 40, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, M.; Yang, K. Chinese Familism: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Assessment. Bull. Inst. Ethnol. Acad. Sin. 1997, 83, 169–225. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.; Yi, C. A Comparative Perspective on Intergenerational Relations in East Asia. Int. Sociol. 2013, 28, 297–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaium, M.A.; Bao, Y.K.; Alam, M.Z.; Hoque, M.R. Understanding Continuance Usage Intention of mHealth in a Developing Country: An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Pharm. Healthc. Mark. 2020, 14, 251–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, H.; Jo, S.H.; Jung, H.J.; Lee, E. Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Mobile Social Network Services in an Aging Society: Value of Informative, Hedonic and Ubiquitous Services. J. Serv. Mark. 2021, 35, 834–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, C.Y.; Jia, S.L.; He, C.Z. An Empirical Study on the Factors Affecting Elderly Users’ Continuance Intention of Shared Nurses. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2020, 13, 1849–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoogerwerf, A. Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1st ed.; Penerbit Erlangga: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Arkanuddin, M.F.; Susanti; Broto, M.F. The Role of Government Policy Toward Technology Continuance Intention on Digital Industry in Indonesia. Indones. J. Soc. Res. (IJSR) 2023, 5, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on Issuing the “Several Measures on Cultivating Elderly Care Service Business Entities and Promoting the Development of the Silver Economy”. 2025. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202601/content_7054605.htm (accessed on 20 February 2026).
- National Development and Reform Commission. Notice of the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Finance on the Implementation of the 2026 Policy for Large-Scale Equipment Upgrading and Consumer Goods Trade-in Programs (FGHZ [2025] No. 1745). 2026. Available online: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202512/t20251230_1402851.html (accessed on 20 February 2026).
- The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Promoting Trade-in Programs to Improve the Resource Circular Utilization Chain. 2024. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/202403/content_6939232.htm (accessed on 20 February 2026).
- The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Home Appliance Trade-in Program: Enhanced Policy Support, Business Benefits, and Consumer Gains—How Did Purchases Exceed 100 Million Units in Less than Eight Months? 2025. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202504/content_7020036.htm (accessed on 20 February 2026).
- Jia, X.Y.; Pang, Y.; Huang, B.Q.; Hou, F. Understanding Consumers’ Continuance Intention to Watch Streams: A Value-Based Continuance Intention Model. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1073301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fengrui, Z. Expanded Trade-in Policies Put Smart Home and Age-Friendly Products at the Forefront of the Home Furnishings Industry. Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1854292766553022017&wfr=spider&for=pcz (accessed on 21 February 2026).
- Isaac, O.; Abdullah, Z.; Ramayah, T.; Mutahar, A. Internet Usage, User Satisfaction, Task-Technology Fit, and Performance Impact Among Public Sector Employees in Yemen. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 2017, 34, 210–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, A.; Lee, S.B. Examining AI and Systemic Factors for Improved Chatbot Sustainability. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2024, 64, 728–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjälm, A. “Because We Know Our Limits”: Elderly Parents’ Views on Intergenerational Proximity and Intimacy. J. Aging Stud. 2012, 26, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luijkx, K.; Peek, S.; Wouters, E. “Grandma, You Should Do It-It’s Cool” Older Adults and the Role of Family Members in Their Acceptance of Technology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 15470–15485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, X.Y.; Song, L.B.; Lin, Z.Y. Effect of Behavior Change Techniques on Users’ Continuance Intention of Health Management Apps. DYNA 2022, 97, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahi, S.; Mansour, M.M.O.; Alharafsheh, M.; Alghizzawi, M. The Post-Adoption Behavior of Internet Banking Users Through the Eyes of Self-Determination Theory and Expectation Confirmation Model. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2021, 34, 1874–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Jiang, X.S.; Cao, J.W. Factors Affecting Continuance Intention in Non-Face-to-Face Telemedicine Services: Trust Typology and Privacy Concern Perspectives. Healthcare 2023, 11, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shandong Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Shandong Province Seventh National Census Bulletin. 2021. Available online: http://tjj.shandong.gov.cn/col/col6293/index.html (accessed on 22 February 2024).
- Cai, Y.D. Industry Observation|There Are 23,000 Smart Home Companies in Shandong, Qingdao, Jinan and Linyi Rank Among the Top Three. Available online: https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1686138099372590230&wfr=spider&for=pc (accessed on 9 December 2024).
- Feng, Z.L. Chapter 17: Filial Piety and Old-age Support in China: Tradition, Continuity, and Change. In Handbook on the Family and Marriage in China; Zang, X., Zhao, L.X., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2017; pp. 266–285. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022; p. 400. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sinkovics, R.R. The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing. In New Challenges to International Marketing; Sinkovics, R.R., Ghauri, P.N., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.: Leeds, UK, 2009; Volume 20, pp. 277–319. [Google Scholar]
- Oche, M.O.; Umar, A.S.; Ibrahim, M.T.O.; Sabitu, K. An Assessment of the Impact of Health Education on Maternal Knowledge and Practice of Childhood Immunization in Kware, Sokoto State. J. Public Health Epidemiol. 2011, 3, 440–447. [Google Scholar]
- Sekaran, U.; Bougie, J.R.G. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 5th ed.; Wiley Publishers: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Neuman, W.L. Social Research Methods; Pearson: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Chiu, C.-J.; Hsieh, S.; Li, C.-W. Needs and Preferences of Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Taiwan for Companion Robots and Pets: Survey Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e23471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Etikan, I.; Musa, S.A.; Alkassim, R.S. Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2016, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SOHU. The “Age Standard for the Elderly” Was Announced in 2023: After This Age, You Can Be Called an Older Adult. Available online: https://www.sohu.com/a/725283908_121124452 (accessed on 18 November 2024).
- Bambale, A.J. Research Methodological Techniques as a Model for Quantitative Studies in Social Sciences. Br. J. Econ. Manag. Trade 2014, 4, 862–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reynolds, D.; Sammons, P.; De Fraine, B.; Van Damme, J.; Townsend, T.; Teddlie, C.; Stringfield, S. Educational Effectiveness Research (EER): A State-of-the-Art Review. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2014, 25, 197–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2013; 567p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minglong, W. SPSS Statistical Application Practice; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Rigdon, E.E.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Mark. ZFP-J. Res. Manag. 2017, 39, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masuwai, A.; Zulkifli, H.; Hamzah, M.I. Evaluation of Content Validity and Face Validity of Secondary School Islamic Education Teacher Self-Assessment Instrument. Cogent Educ. 2024, 11, 2308410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lynn, M.R. Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nurs. Res. 1986, 35, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davis, L.L. Instrument Review: Getting the Most from Your Panel of Experts. Appl. Nurs. Res. 1992, 5, 194–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, T.L. Doing Social Research, 2nd ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Southon, P.D.; Liu, L.; Fellows, E.A.; Price, D.J.; Halder, G.J.; Chapman, K.W.; Moubaraki, B.; Murray, K.S.; Létard, J.-F.; Kepert, C.J. Dynamic Interplay between Spin-Crossover and Host-Guest Function in a Nanoporous Metal-Organic Framework Material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10998–11009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kock, N. Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach. Int. J. E-Collab. 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, G.W.; Cooper-Thomas, H.D.; Lau, R.S.; Wang, L.C. Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2024, 41, 745–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, E. Making Reliability Reliable: A Systematic Approach to Reliability Coefficients. Organ. Res. Methods 2016, 19, 651–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tenenhaus, M.; Vinzi, V.E.; Chatelin, Y.M.; Lauro, C. PLS Path Modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48, 159–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wetzels, M.; Odekerken-Schröder, G.; van Oppen, C. Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Q. 2009, 33, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahi, S.; Ghani, M.A. Do Gamified Elements Influence User’s Intention to Adopt and Intention to Recommend Internet Banking? Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 2019, 36, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanda, V.; Hao, L.Y.; Schulzrinne, H. From Frustration to Function: A Study on Usability Challenges in Smart Home IoT Devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE 21st Consumer Communications & Networking Conference, CCNC, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 6–9 January 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.J.; Felber, N.A.; Pageau, F.; Schwab, D.R.; Wangmo, T. Benefits and Barriers Associated with the Use of Smart Home Health Technologies in the Care of Older Persons: A Systematic Review. BMC Geriatr. 2024, 24, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sina. The Hidden Costs of Smart Homes: Beyond the Purchase Price, These Invisible Expenses Are Draining Your Wallet. Available online: https://cj.sina.com.cn/articles/view/7880068201/1d5b04c6901901rdfo (accessed on 20 February 2026).
- Cao, Y.; Erdt, M.; Robert, C.; Naharudin, N.B.; Lee, S.Q.; Theng, Y.-L. Decision-making Factors toward the Adoption of Smart Home Sensors by Older Adults in Singapore: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Aging 2022, 5, e34239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, K.; Gao, M.; Guida, F.E.; He, R. Research on Influencing Factors of Elderly User Experience of Smart Home Social Software Based on Grounded Theory. In Proceedings of the Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population, Copenhagen, Denmark, 23–28 July 2023; pp. 17–30. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, K.; Gao, M.; Guida, F.E.; He, R.K. Understanding the Influencing Factors and Mechanism of Social Compensation for Chinese Older Adults Using Social Media in the Context of Smart Home: A Qualitative Analysis. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1174920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Constructs | Items | Questions (7-Point Likert Scale) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government Policy (GP) | GP 1 | Government-led campaigns and educational initiatives have raised public awareness of smart homes. | [85,94] |
| GP2 | Substantial incentives (subsidies or tax breaks) offered by the government have lowered the costs of adopting smart homes. | ||
| GP 3 | Government policies have promoted the public’s adoption of smart homes. | ||
| Compatibility (COM) | COM 1 | Different smart home devices can operate seamlessly with one another. | [9,30,94] |
| COM 2 | Smart homes from different vendors can interoperate seamlessly. | ||
| COM 3 | The use of smart homes aligns with all aspects of my daily life. | ||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | ITS 1 | My children guide me in learning how to use smart homes. | [23,24,27] |
| ITS 2 | With my children’s guidance, I can easily operate smart homes. | ||
| ITS 3 | My children assist me when I encounter difficulties using smart homes. | ||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | PU 1 | I think smart homes can improve my health. | [83] |
| PU 2 | I think smart homes can enhance my quality of life. | ||
| PU 3 | Smart homes give me more options. | ||
| PU 4 | I think smart homes are highly useful. | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | PEOU 1 | The operation process of smart homes is simple. | [83] |
| PEOU 2 | I do not have to think hard when using smart homes. | ||
| PEOU 3 | I find smart homes easy to use. | ||
| PEOU 4 | I find it easy to get smart homes to do what I want it to do. | ||
| Cost (CS) | CS 1 | I believe that purchasing smart homes requires a substantial financial investment. | [58] |
| CS 2 | I find maintaining the operation of smart homes to be a financial burden. | ||
| CS 3 | I find the potential repair costs of smart homes to be high. | ||
| Confirmation (CNF) | CNF 1 | The service level provided by smart homes was better than what I expected. | [97,98] |
| CNF 2 | The various features of smart homes were better than what I expected. | ||
| CNF 3 | Smart homes were easier to use than what I expected. | ||
| CNF 4 | Overall, most of my expectations toward smart homes were confirmed. | ||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT 1 | The decision to use smart homes is right and wise. | [83] |
| SAT 2 | The experience of using smart homes will make me feel happy. | ||
| SAT 3 | Overall, I am satisfied with smart homes. | ||
| SAT 4 | I am confident in the development of smart homes. | ||
| Continuance Intention (CI) | CI 1 | I am interested in smart homes. | [83] |
| CI 2 | I would like to continue using smart homes. | ||
| CI 3 | I would recommend smart homes to my family and friends. | ||
| CI 4 | I think we should encourage people to use smart homes. |
| City in Shandong | Older Adults | Proportion of Older Adults | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linyi | 2,163,415 | 27% | 104 |
| Weifang | 2,043,071 | 25% | 96 |
| Qingdao | 2,042,649 | 25% | 96 |
| Jinan | 1,837,112 | 23% | 89 |
| Sample | Category | Frequencies (n) | Percentages (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 60–65 years | 220 | 52.3 |
| 66–70 years | 155 | 36.8 | |
| >70 years | 46 | 10.9 | |
| Gender | Male | 212 | 50.4 |
| Female | 209 | 49.6 | |
| Education Level | Junior high school or below | 118 | 28.0 |
| High school | 173 | 41.1 | |
| Junior college diploma | 71 | 16.9 | |
| Bachelor’s degree or above | 59 | 14.0 | |
| Household Size | 1 person | 26 | 6.2 |
| 2 persons | 52 | 12.4 | |
| 3–4 persons | 185 | 43.9 | |
| ≥5 persons | 158 | 37.5 | |
| Employment Status | Employed | 52 | 12.4 |
| Retired | 369 | 87.6 | |
| Types of Occupation | Private enterprise | 175 | 41.6 |
| Foreign-funded enterprise | 64 | 15.2 | |
| Government or public institution | 83 | 19.7 | |
| Freelance | 99 | 23.5 |
| Construct | CI | CNF | COM | CS | GP | ITS | PEOU | PU | SAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention (CI) | |||||||||
| Confirmation (CNF) | 1.786 | 2.009 | 2.106 | ||||||
| Compatibility (COM) | 1.272 | ||||||||
| Cost (CS) | 1.452 | ||||||||
| Government Policy (GP) | 1.639 | 1.272 | 1.627 | 1.628 | |||||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | 1.318 | ||||||||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | 1.929 | 1.589 | 1.595 | ||||||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 1.850 | 1.760 | |||||||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 1.984 |
| Constructs | Items | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability (CR) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention (CI) | CI1 | 0.942 | 0.958 |
| CI2 | |||
| CI3 | |||
| CI4 | |||
| Confirmation (CNF) | CNF1 | 0.935 | 0.953 |
| CNF2 | |||
| CNF3 | |||
| CNF4 | |||
| Compatibility (COM) | COM1 | 0.919 | 0.949 |
| COM2 | |||
| COM3 | |||
| Cost (CS) | CS1 | 0.925 | 0.952 |
| CS2 | |||
| CS3 | |||
| Government Policy (GP) | GP1 | 0.923 | 0.951 |
| GP2 | |||
| GP3 | |||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | ITS1 | 0.917 | 0.948 |
| ITS2 | |||
| ITS3 | |||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | PEOU1 | 0.945 | 0.960 |
| PEOU2 | |||
| PEOU3 | |||
| PEOU4 | |||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | PU1 | 0.931 | 0.951 |
| PU2 | |||
| PU3 | |||
| PU4 | |||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT1 | 0.930 | 0.950 |
| SAT2 | |||
| SAT3 | |||
| SAT4 |
| Constructs | Items | Factor Loadings | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention (CI) | CI 1 | 0.931 | 0.852 |
| CI 2 | 0.923 | ||
| CI 3 | 0.913 | ||
| CI 4 | 0.926 | ||
| Confirmation (CNF) | CNF 1 | 0.908 | 0.836 |
| CNF 2 | 0.917 | ||
| CNF 3 | 0.910 | ||
| CNF 4 | 0.923 | ||
| Compatibility (COM) | COM 1 | 0.931 | 0.860 |
| COM 2 | 0.921 | ||
| COM 3 | 0.931 | ||
| Cost (CS) | CS 1 | 0.933 | 0.870 |
| CS 2 | 0.933 | ||
| CS 3 | 0.931 | ||
| Government Policy (GP) | GP 1 | 0.931 | 0.867 |
| GP 2 | 0.930 | ||
| GP 3 | 0.933 | ||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | ITS 1 | 0.930 | 0.858 |
| ITS 2 | 0.929 | ||
| ITS 3 | 0.921 | ||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | PEOU 1 | 0.931 | 0.858 |
| PEOU 2 | 0.919 | ||
| PEOU 3 | 0.925 | ||
| PEOU 4 | 0.930 | ||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | PU 1 | 0.915 | 0.829 |
| PU 2 | 0.906 | ||
| PU 3 | 0.909 | ||
| PU 4 | 0.912 | ||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | SAT 1 | 0.929 | 0.827 |
| SAT 2 | 0.905 | ||
| SAT 3 | 0.905 | ||
| SAT 4 | 0.897 |
| Construct | CI | CNF | COM | CS | GP | ITS | PEOU | PU | SAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention (CI) | 0.923 | ||||||||
| Confirmation (CNF) | 0.601 | 0.915 | |||||||
| Compatibility (COM) | 0.463 | 0.583 | 0.927 | ||||||
| Cost (CS) | −0.491 | −0.419 | −0.343 | 0.933 | |||||
| Government Policy (GP) | 0.488 | 0.611 | 0.462 | −0.451 | 0.931 | ||||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | 0.564 | 0.475 | 0.447 | −0.348 | 0.388 | 0.926 | |||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | 0.572 | 0.598 | 0.479 | −0.392 | 0.455 | 0.653 | 0.926 | ||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 0.654 | 0.646 | 0.507 | −0.493 | 0.567 | 0.495 | 0.481 | 0.911 | |
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 0.642 | 0.562 | 0.454 | −0.412 | 0.419 | 0.517 | 0.658 | 0.523 | 0.909 |
| Construct | CI | CNF | COM | CS | GP | ITS | PEOU | PU | SAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention (CI) | |||||||||
| Confirmation (CNF) | 0.640 | ||||||||
| Compatibility (COM) | 0.497 | 0.627 | |||||||
| Cost (CS) | 0.526 | 0.451 | 0.372 | ||||||
| Government Policy (GP) | 0.523 | 0.656 | 0.500 | 0.488 | |||||
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | 0.606 | 0.513 | 0.487 | 0.377 | 0.420 | ||||
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | 0.607 | 0.636 | 0.514 | 0.419 | 0.487 | 0.701 | |||
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 0.698 | 0.693 | 0.546 | 0.531 | 0.611 | 0.535 | 0.513 | ||
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 0.685 | 0.602 | 0.491 | 0.443 | 0.451 | 0.558 | 0.701 | 0.562 |
| Path Type | Hypothesis | Path Coefficient (β) | t-Statistics | p-Values | Hypothesis Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct paths to CI | H1: SAT → CI | 0.300 | 5.053 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
| H2: PU → CI | 0.340 | 5.824 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H3: GP → CI | 0.051 | 0.950 | 0.342 | Not supported | |
| H4: PEOU → CI | 0.140 | 2.392 | 0.017 * | Supported | |
| H5: CS → CI | −0.122 | 2.623 | 0.009 ** | Supported | |
| Mechanism paths | H6: GP → PU | 0.258 | 4.778 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
| H7: GP → CNF | 0.434 | 9.020 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H8: GP → PEOU | 0.071 | 1.486 | 0.137 | Not supported | |
| H9: COM → CNF | 0.382 | 8.526 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H10: ITS → PEOU | 0.467 | 9.821 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H11: PU → SAT | 0.198 | 3.409 | 0.001 ** | Supported | |
| H12: CNF → PU | 0.422 | 7.445 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H13: CNF → SAT | 0.152 | 2.321 | 0.020 * | Supported | |
| H14: CNF → PEOU | 0.333 | 6.163 | 0.000 *** | Supported | |
| H15: PEOU → PU | 0.111 | 2.223 | 0.026 * | Supported | |
| H16: PEOU → SAT | 0.472 | 8.040 | 0.000 *** | Supported |
| Construct | R2 | Q2 | f2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance Intention | 0.580 | 0.490 | |
| Perceived Ease of Use | 0.536 | 0.457 | 0.024 |
| Satisfaction | 0.500 | 0.407 | 0.108 |
| Perceived Usefulness | 0.473 | 0.387 | 0.149 |
| Model Fit Index | Estimated Model | Threshold | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRMR | 0.069 | <0.08 | Good fit |
| NFI | 0.917 | >0.90 | Acceptable fit |
| Latent Constructs | Importance (Total Effect of the Latent Variable Continuance Intention) | Performance (Index Values) |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) | 0.400 | 63.091 |
| Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) | 0.326 | 59.593 |
| Confirmation (CNF) | 0.323 | 62.974 |
| Government Policy (GP) | 0.318 | 66.152 |
| Satisfaction (SAT) | 0.300 | 65.779 |
| Intergenerational Technical Support (ITS) | 0.152 | 59.084 |
| Compatibility (COM) | 0.123 | 56.68 |
| Cost (CS) | −0.122 | 39.114 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Sani, N.M.; Lu, H.; Hua, Y.; Jin, J. Explaining Older Adults’ Continuance Intention Toward Smart Homes: Integrating the Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems and the Technology Acceptance Model. Buildings 2026, 16, 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061133
Wang Y, Sani NM, Lu H, Hua Y, Jin J. Explaining Older Adults’ Continuance Intention Toward Smart Homes: Integrating the Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems and the Technology Acceptance Model. Buildings. 2026; 16(6):1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061133
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Yuan, Norazmawati Md. Sani, Honglei Lu, Yinhong Hua, and Jing Jin. 2026. "Explaining Older Adults’ Continuance Intention Toward Smart Homes: Integrating the Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems and the Technology Acceptance Model" Buildings 16, no. 6: 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061133
APA StyleWang, Y., Sani, N. M., Lu, H., Hua, Y., & Jin, J. (2026). Explaining Older Adults’ Continuance Intention Toward Smart Homes: Integrating the Expectation–Confirmation Model of Information Systems and the Technology Acceptance Model. Buildings, 16(6), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16061133

