Study on Multi-Scale Strength Formation Mechanism of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Based on Statistical Damage Theory
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.1.1. FA
2.1.2. Alkali Activator
2.1.3. Aggregates
2.1.4. Water-Reducing Agent
2.1.5. Sample Preparation and Test Procedure
2.2. Experimental Methods
2.2.1. Uniaxial Compression Test
2.2.2. NMR Test
2.2.3. SEM Test
2.2.4. XRD Test
3. Test Results Analysis
3.1. Uniaxial Compression Test Analysis
3.1.1. Elastic Modulus
3.1.2. Peak Stress
3.1.3. Peak Strain
3.1.4. Stress–Strain Curves
3.1.5. Damage Characteristics
3.2. NMR Testing Analysis
3.3. SEM Testing Analysis
3.4. XRD Testing Analysis
4. Mesoscopic Damage Mechanism Discussion
4.1. Statistical Damage Model
4.2. Mesoscopic Damage Mechanisms
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The macroscopic mechanical properties of FAG are closely related to the AL/B, exhibiting consistent variation laws at 7 d and 28 d alike: the σp and E of FAG first increase and then decrease with the increase of AL/B, reaching their maximum values at AL/B = 0.45; conversely, the εp reaches its minimum value at AL/B = 0.45. At the curing age of 28 d, the σp and E of specimens with AL/B = 0.45 are 11.33–365.60% and 45.98–936.28% higher than those of other AL/B groups, respectively, while their deformability decreases by approximately 20.83–58.70%. Under the experimental conditions adopted in this study, the optimal AL/B of FAG is 0.45. Both excessively low and high AL/B hinder the full development of polymerization reactions within FAG, leading to degradation of mechanical properties.
- (2)
- The aluminosilicate phase is a reaction product of FAG, as evidenced by experimental results from NMR, SEM, and XRD, significantly influencing the microstructural evolution of FAG. With increased AL/B, the porosity initially falls and subsequently rises, attaining its lowest value at AL/B = 0.45, which closely aligns with the strength variation law. When AL/B = 0.45, FA particles exhibit higher dissolution, and the alkali activation reaction is sufficient. This condition results in the highest density microstructure and the maximum quantity of N-A-S-H gel formation. With increasing curing age, the XRD diffuse peak intensity increases. As the AL/B increases, the intensity of the characteristic N-A-S-H gel peak first increases and then decreases, reaching its peak at AL/B = 0.45.
- (3)
- The strength of concrete is determined by both microstructural mechanical characteristics and mesoscopic damage evolution. This study demonstrates the impact of AL/B and curing age on the evolution laws of mesoscopic damage in FAG, as derived from statistical damage theory. For curing ages of 7 d and 28 d, the values of εa, εh, εb and H show a trend of decreasing first and then increasing around AL/B = 0.45. With the rise of the AL/B, the triangular distribution curves of yield damage and fracture damage first shift leftward and then rightward gradually. This verifies that the damage mechanism of FAG has an obvious threshold effect and reveals the nonlinear characteristics of the uniform damage evolution of FAG. Moreover, σcr/σp increases first and then decreases with the growth of AL/B, while εcr/εp decreases first and then increases, which further clarifies that the critical strain lags behind the peak strain. All these results demonstrate that the macroscopic nonlinear stress–strain behavior of FAG is closely correlated with its mesoscopic damage evolution.
- (4)
- This study systematically elucidates the influence of AL/B and curing age on the multi-scale strength formation mechanism of FAG, which contributes to promoting the efficient resource utilization of fly ash-based solid waste in multiple fields such as green building materials, road engineering, and mine backfilling. It should be noted that, due to the limitations of the research scope, this paper has not yet examined the durability, semi-quantitative XRD analysis, or tensile and flexural properties of FAG. Subsequent studies will focus on the aforementioned aspects to provide more comprehensive data support for the engineering application of FAG.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- He, Z.; Shen, A.; Lyu, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, W. Effect of Wollastonite Microfibers as Cement Replacement on the Properties of Cementitious Composites: A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 261, 119920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, N.; Kumar, A. Samsher Design of Solar Cement Plant for Supplying Thermal Energy in Cement Production. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 426, 139151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrew, R.M. Global CO2 Emissions from Cement Production, 1928–2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2019, 11, 1675–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardjasaputra, H.; Cornelia, M.; Gunawan, Y.; Surjaputra, I.V.; Lie, H.A.; Rachmansyah; Pranata Ng, G. Study of Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 615, 012009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Su, T.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, R.; Ma, K.; Zhang, L.; Amaechi, C.V.; Wang, C. The Influence of Fly Ash and Slag on the Mechanical Properties of Geopolymer Concrete. Buildings 2024, 14, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz-Loya, E.I.; Allouche, E.N.; Vaidya, S. Mechanical Properties of Fly-Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2011, 108, 300. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, P.; Gao, Z.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.; Hu, S.; Ling, Y. Properties of Fresh and Hardened Fly Ash/Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 270, 122389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, D.; Liu, Z.; Lin, C.; Lu, Y.; Li, S. Effects and Mechanisms of Component Ratio and Cross-Scale Fibers on Drying Shrinkage of Geopolymer Mortar. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamsol, A.’liaS.; Apandi, N.M.; Zailani, W.W.A.; Izwan, K.N.K.; Zakaria, M.; Zulkarnain, N.N. Graphene Oxide as Carbon-Based Materials: A Review of Geopolymer with Addition of Graphene Oxide towards Sustainable Construction Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Niu, X.; Zhu, Y. Deformation Behavior and Damage Evaluation of Fly Ash-Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete under Cyclic Tension. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deb, P.S.; Nath, P.; Sarker, P.K. Drying Shrinkage of Slag Blended Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete Cured at Room Temperature. Procedia Eng. 2015, 125, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzali, S.A.E.; Shayanfar, M.A.; Ghanooni-Bagha, M.; Golafshani, E.; Ngo, T. The Use of Machine Learning Techniques to Investigate the Properties of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 446, 141305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assi, L.N.; Carter, K.; Deaver, E.; Ziehl, P. Review of Availability of Source Materials for Geopolymer/Sustainable Concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavithra, P.; Srinivasula Reddy, M.; Dinakar, P.; Hanumantha Rao, B.; Satpathy, B.K.; Mohanty, A.N. A Mix Design Procedure for Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pazouki, G. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete’s compressive strength estimation by applying artificial intelligence methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 203, 111916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morla, P.; Gupta, R.; Azarsa, P.; Sharma, A. Corrosion Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Bottom Ash. Sustainability 2021, 13, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hager, I.; Sitarz, M.; Mróz, K. Fly-ash based geopolymer mortar for high-temperature application-Effect of slag addition. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.; Zhu, P.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Ge, W.; Hua, M. Resistance to Sulfuric Acid Corrosion of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Different Binding Materials and Alkali Concentrations. Materials 2021, 14, 7109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Sun, M.; Wang, M.; Wan, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P. Molecular Insight into the Formation and Fracture Process of Sodium Aluminosilicate Hydrate Gels. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 15542–15555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.G.K.M.; Kinuthia, J.M.; Oti, J.; Adeleke, B.O. Geopolymer Chemistry and Composition: A Comprehensive Review of Synthesis, Reaction Mechanisms, and Material Properties—Oriented with Sustainable Construction. Materials 2025, 18, 3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Zhu, L.; Wan, D.; Xue, Y. Research Progress and Trend Analysis of Solid Waste Resource Utilization in Geopolymer Concrete. Buildings 2025, 15, 3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assi, L.N.; Deaver, E.; El Batanouny, M.K.; Ziehl, P. Investigation of Early Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 112, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Fan, C.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z. Workability, Rheology, and Geopolymerization of Fly Ash Geopolymer: Role of Alkali Content, Modulus, and Water–Binder Ratio. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Lin, W.; Liu, W. Effect of NaOH Concentration on Properties and Microstructure of a Novel Reactive Ultra-Fine Fly Ash Geopolymer. Adv. Powder Technol. 2021, 32, 2929–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, A.K.; Kumar, D.R. Effect of Various Alkaline Binder Ratio on Geopolymer Concrete under Ambient Curing Condition. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 1768–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharath, B.P.; Shivaprasad, K.N.; Athikkal, M.M.; Das, B.B. Some Studies on Sustainable Utilization of Iron Ore Tailing (IOT) as Fine Aggregates in Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Mortar. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 431, 092010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thakur, M.; Bawa, S. Evaluation of Strength and Durability Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Containing GGBS and Dolomite. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2023, 9, 256–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aliabdo, A.A.; Elmoaty, A.E.M.A.; Salem, H.A. Effect of Water Addition, Plasticizer and Alkaline Solution Constitution on Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 121, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rangan, B.V. Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Curtin Univ. Technol. 2008, 7, 1–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, P.; Sarker, P.K. Flexural Strength and Elastic Modulus of Ambient-Cured Blended Low-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 130, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, F.A.; Nuruddin, M.F.; Shafiq, N. Effect of Silica Fume on the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Fly Ash-Based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2013, 20, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashmi, A.F.; Shariq, M.; Baqi, A. An Investigation into Age-Dependent Strength, Elastic Modulus and Deflection of Low Calcium Fly Ash Concrete for Sustainable Construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 283, 122772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Jin, F.; Hou, Y.; Zhou, Y. Discrete-Contact-Fracture Analysis of Rock and Concrete. Chin. J. Rock. Mech. Eng. 2008, 27, 217–235. [Google Scholar]
- Krajcinovic, D.; Silva, M.A.G. Statistical Aspects of the Continuous Damage Theory. Int. J. Solids Struct. 1982, 18, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Shen, J.; Guan, J.; Wang, J.; Yuan, C. Study on Compressive Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete with Silica Fume at Different Strain Rates. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Li, W.; Guan, J.; Wang, J.; Yuan, C. Research on the Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Compression Based on the Statistical Damage Model. Materials 2020, 13, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, W.-F.; Wang, W.-L.; Guan, J.-F.; Wang, J.; Yuan, C. Compressive Stress-Strain Relationships of Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperatures Based on Mesoscopic Damage Method. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2022, 31, 1420–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Ye, D.; Ye, S.; Yuan, C.; Guan, J.; Yang, G.; Xie, C. Study on Mechanical Properties and Damage Mechanism of Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Lu, X.; Guan, J.; Yuan, C. Experimental Study on Uniaxial Compression Mechanical Properties of Recycled Concrete with Silica Fume Considering the Effect of Curing Age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 350, 128758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liu, S. Influence of Slag as Additive on Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2007, 19, 470–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Zhang, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, K.; Zhang, T. Interfacial Properties of Geopolymer Mortar and Concrete Substrate: Effect of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fiber and Nano-SiO2 Contents. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 315, 125735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SL/T 352-2020; Specifications for Hydraulic Concrete Testing. China Water Resources and Electric Power Press: Beijing, China, 2020. (In Chinese)
- GB/T 14685-2022; Construction Aggregates (Gravel and Crushed Stone). China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2022. (In Chinese)
- Ojha, A.; Aggarwal, P. Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete: A Comprehensive Review. Silicon 2021, 14, 2453–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, B.; Mathew, G. Influence of Aggregate Content on the Behavior of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete. Sci. Iran. 2012, 19, 1188–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 50080-2016; Standard for Test Method of Performance on Ordinary Fresh Concrete. China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese)
- GB/T 50081-2019; Standard Test Method for Physical and Mechanical Properties of Concrete. China Architecture&Building Press: Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese)
- Yu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; An, Q. Experimental Study on Cavitation Effects on Concrete Pore Structure and Mechanical Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 458, 139644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Rao, R.; Wang, C.; Fang, C. Effects of Combined Usage of GGBS and Fly Ash on Workability and Mechanical Properties of Alkali Activated Geopolymer Concrete with Recycled Aggregate. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 164, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jallu, M.; Saride, S.; Arulrajah, A.; Challapalli, S.; Evans, R. Effect of Curing Time on the Performance of Fly Ash Geopolymer-Stabilized RAP Bases. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 33, 04021001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escalante-Garcia, J.I.; Espinoza-Perez, L.J.; Gorokhovsky, A.; Gomez-Zamorano, L.Y. Coarse Blast Furnace Slag as a Cementitious Material, Comparative Study as a Partial Replacement of Portland Cement and as an Alkali Activated Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2511–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, D.; Chen, R.; Cheng, J.; Tang, Y.; Xiao, C.; Li, Z. Desert Sand-High Calcium Fly Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Mortar: Flowability, Mechanical Properties, and Microscopic Analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 398, 131729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Shi, C.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, L. Compressive Strength, Pore Structure and Chloride Transport Properties of Alkali-Activated Slag/Fly Ash Mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2019, 104, 103392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Long, C.; Tam, V.W.Y.; Poon, C.-S.; Duan, W.H. Effects of Nano-Particles on Failure Process and Microstructural Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 142, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castillo, H.; Collado, H.; Droguett, T.; Vesely, M.; Garrido, P.; Palma, S. State of the Art of Geopolymers: A Review. E-Polymers 2022, 22, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adam, A.A.; Akifa, S.N.; Siregar, A.P.N.; Mustofa. Effect of Method and Duration of Curing on the Compressive Strength of the Lime-Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1594, 012030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaseri, S.; Hajiaghaei, G.; Mohammadi, F.; Mahdikhani, M.; Farokhzad, R. The Role of Synthesis Parameters on the Workability, Setting and Strength Properties of Binary Binder Based Geopolymer Paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 157, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Suo, G.; Yuan, C.; Guan, J.; Xie, C.; Li, L. Study on Multi-Scale Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Metakaolin Modified Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Coupling Conditions of Sulfate Attack and Dry-Wet Cycles. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 94, 109921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Hu, H.; Yuan, C.; Guan, J.; Xie, C.; Lv, Y. The Influence of Blast Furnace Slag on the Mechanical Properties and Mesoscopic Damage Mechanisms of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Compared to Natural Aggregate Concrete at Different Ages. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 94, 109926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Geng, Y.; Yuan, C.; Guan, J.; Lv, Y.; Xie, C.; Lei, J. Study on Mechanical Properties and Mesoscopic Damage Mechanism of Metakaolin Modified Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Dev. Built Environ. 2024, 17, 100332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Geel, H.M.G. Concrete Behaviour in Multiaxial Compression: Experimental Research. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, W.; Song, Z.; Yuan, C.; Guan, J.; Xie, C.; Huang, H.; Ma, Y. Study on Mechanical Properties and Damage Mechanism of Recycled Concrete Containing Silica Fume in Freeze–Thaw Environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 375, 130872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, H.V.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, D.J.; Park, J. Electrical Properties of Smart Ultra-High Performance Concrete under Various Temperatures, Humidities, and Age of Concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 118, 103979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, C. Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete under Uniaxial Loading. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]























| SiO2/% | Na2O/% | Modulus | Density/(g/cm3) | Baume/°Bé | Transparence/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.5 | 8.88 | 3.43 | 1.41 | 42 | 88 |
| Aggregate | Apparent Density/(kg/m3) | Tap Density/(kg/m3) | Bulk Density/(kg/m3) | Water Content/% | Water Absorption/% | Crushing Index /% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River sand | 2580 | 1750 | 1500 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - |
| Coarse aggregate | 2810 | 1720 | 1500 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 10.6 |
| Test Item | Chloride Ion Content/% | Total Alkali Content/% | Solid Content/% | Water Reduction Rate/% | Bleeding Rate/% | Air Content/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | 0.044 | 0.35 | 98 | 30 | 58 | 4.0 |
| Mix Proportion Number | Alkali- Binder Ratio | Fly Ash | River Sand | Coarse Aggregate | Alkali Activator | Effective Water Content of the Alkaline Solution | Wate Reducing Agent | Additional Water | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaOH | Na2SiO3 | ||||||||
| FAG25 | 0.25 | 400.00 | 668.97 | 1242.37 | 30.78 | 69.22 | 60.45 | 8.00 | 49.44 |
| FAG35 | 0.35 | 400.00 | 660.68 | 1226.98 | 43.09 | 96.91 | 84.62 | 8.00 | 29.22 |
| FAG45 | 0.45 | 400.00 | 652.39 | 1211.59 | 55.40 | 124.60 | 108.80 | 8.00 | 9.00 |
| FAG55 | 0.55 | 400.00 | 633.40 | 1176.32 | 67.71 | 152.29 | 124.00 | 8.00 | 0.00 |
| FAG65 | 0.65 | 400.00 | 605.83 | 1125.11 | 80.02 | 179.98 | 132.00 | 8.00 | 0.00 |
| Age | AL/B | εa/×10−4 | εh/×10−4 | εb/×10−4 | H | RE | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 d | 0.25 | 6.616 | 13.768 | 26.166 | 0.451 | 1.000 | 0.9997 |
| 0.35 | 4.860 | 10.000 | 24.870 | 0.230 | 1.848 | 0.9988 | |
| 0.45 | 4.653 | 9.360 | 21.310 | 0.189 | 2.708 | 0.9997 | |
| 0.55 | 5.314 | 10.327 | 22.001 | 0.241 | 1.510 | 0.9984 | |
| 0.65 | 9.621 | 14.752 | 33.894 | 0.260 | 0.971 | 0.9992 | |
| 28 d | 0.25 | 7.563 | 9.924 | 29.148 | 0.466 | 1.000 | 0.9994 |
| 0.35 | 6.577 | 8.985 | 15.286 | 0.327 | 3.196 | 0.9977 | |
| 0.45 | 2.293 | 7.694 | 13.505 | 0.197 | 10.363 | 0.9985 | |
| 0.55 | 2.612 | 7.909 | 15.464 | 0.245 | 7.099 | 0.9976 | |
| 0.65 | 2.904 | 8.407 | 16.119 | 0.364 | 5.311 | 0.9998 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yuan, C.; Zhang, W.; Bai, W.; Xie, Y.; Guan, J.; Cui, Y.; Xie, C. Study on Multi-Scale Strength Formation Mechanism of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Based on Statistical Damage Theory. Buildings 2026, 16, 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142834
Yuan C, Zhang W, Bai W, Xie Y, Guan J, Cui Y, Xie C. Study on Multi-Scale Strength Formation Mechanism of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Based on Statistical Damage Theory. Buildings. 2026; 16(14):2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142834
Chicago/Turabian StyleYuan, Chenyang, Wen Zhang, Weifeng Bai, Yunfei Xie, Junfeng Guan, Ying Cui, and Chaopeng Xie. 2026. "Study on Multi-Scale Strength Formation Mechanism of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Based on Statistical Damage Theory" Buildings 16, no. 14: 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142834
APA StyleYuan, C., Zhang, W., Bai, W., Xie, Y., Guan, J., Cui, Y., & Xie, C. (2026). Study on Multi-Scale Strength Formation Mechanism of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete Based on Statistical Damage Theory. Buildings, 16(14), 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16142834

