Next Article in Journal
Influence of Ambient Vibration and Monotonic Loading on FEM Updating of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Panels Used in the Building Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Spatial Form of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of Conzenian Urban Morphology—A Case Study of Fengxi Village in Guizhou
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Investment Cost Estimation Method for University Construction Projects Based on Categorical Boosting

School of Engineering, Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang 712082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2026, 16(11), 2236; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112236
Submission received: 20 April 2026 / Revised: 24 May 2026 / Accepted: 25 May 2026 / Published: 1 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Construction Management, and Computers & Digitization)

Abstract

University construction projects often lack complete design information during the decision-making and schematic design stages, which makes it difficult to balance efficiency and accuracy in investment cost estimation. To improve the prediction and interpretation of unit area cost, this study develops a CatBoost-based investment cost estimation framework using 72 completed university construction projects. Eleven project indicators related to structural system, foundation type, seismic grade, number of floors, delivery standard, green building rating, fire door type, window type, and finishing configuration were initially considered as candidate input variables. Feature importance was evaluated using RF-MDI, permutation-MDA, and SHAP values derived from the CatBoost model within the repeated five-fold cross-validation framework, and delivery standard was excluded because it showed the lowest comprehensive contribution. The final CatBoost model was compared with RF, XGBoost, GBDT, LightGBM, and BP neural network models using repeated five-fold cross-validation. CatBoost achieved the best average performance among the compared models, with R2=0.253±0.229, RMSE = 696.53±165.41 CNY/m2, and MAE = 516.34±112.31 CNY/m2. The results suggest that CatBoost provides relatively better prediction accuracy under the current dataset and validation framework, while the relatively low R2 values and performance fluctuations indicate that further validation using larger and more complete datasets is still required.
Keywords: university construction projects; construction cost estimation; CatBoost; unit–area cost; SHAP university construction projects; construction cost estimation; CatBoost; unit–area cost; SHAP

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T. Investment Cost Estimation Method for University Construction Projects Based on Categorical Boosting. Buildings 2026, 16, 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112236

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Wang H, Zhang J, Wang T. Investment Cost Estimation Method for University Construction Projects Based on Categorical Boosting. Buildings. 2026; 16(11):2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yuanyuan, Hao Wang, Jie Zhang, and Ting Wang. 2026. "Investment Cost Estimation Method for University Construction Projects Based on Categorical Boosting" Buildings 16, no. 11: 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112236

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Wang, T. (2026). Investment Cost Estimation Method for University Construction Projects Based on Categorical Boosting. Buildings, 16(11), 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop