Next Article in Journal
Learning from Seoul: Public Rental Housing Development in South Korea and Its Implications for China’s Affordable Housing System Toward “Better Housing”
Previous Article in Journal
School Renovation Impact on IAQ and Embodied Carbon: A Comparative Field Study with Statistical and LCA Insights
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Numerical Study of the Out-of-Plane Response of Dry-Stack Double-Wythe Brick Walls with Header Bricks

Construction Technology Department, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van 65100, Türkiye
Buildings 2025, 15(23), 4342; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234342
Submission received: 10 October 2025 / Revised: 19 November 2025 / Accepted: 26 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Abstract

Walls in masonry structures exhibit sensitive behavior under out-of-plane displacements. Although numerous studies address in-plane behavior, research focusing on out-of-plane response remains limited. The performance of masonry walls is influenced by several factors, including material characteristics, construction defects, mortar quality, support conditions, wall slenderness, and the properties of openings. Because of those parameters, detailed experimental and numerical studies are required to understand the behavior. Double- or multi-wythe masonry is commonly used, and header (or through) bricks are often placed to ensure interlocking between the wythes. The number and arrangement of the header bricks directly influence the wall behavior. Particularly after recent earthquakes, significant damage has been observed in multi-wythe walls, and the role of header bricks in wall performance is not yet fully understood. This study investigates the out-of-plane behavior of double-wythe, two-sided brick walls, in which header bricks are used only in the out-of-plane direction. Numerical analyses were performed on eight different wall models. In these models, header bricks with varying quantities and arrangements were placed perpendicular to the wythes. Lateral load analyses were conducted using the finite element method and micro-modeling technique implemented in ABAQUS software (Version 2022). Two models were validated using the referenced experimental results. The findings indicate that all walls that incorporate header brick exhibit higher lateral capacities. When compared to the reference wall model, the load-to-weight ratio increased with the increase in the number of header bricks. The lateral capacity ratio increased by factors of 1.29, 1.50, 1.68, and 1.81 in walls containing one, two, three, and four vertical rows of header bricks, respectively. When the header bricks were distributed uniformly throughout the wall, the capacity increased by a factor of 1.61. These results demonstrate that the header brick pattern also affects the wall capacity. Additionally, the presence of header bricks directly influences the failure mechanism of the wall.
Keywords: brick wall; lateral load; header brick; masonry; micro modeling; out-of-plane behavior brick wall; lateral load; header brick; masonry; micro modeling; out-of-plane behavior

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kıpçak, F. Numerical Study of the Out-of-Plane Response of Dry-Stack Double-Wythe Brick Walls with Header Bricks. Buildings 2025, 15, 4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234342

AMA Style

Kıpçak F. Numerical Study of the Out-of-Plane Response of Dry-Stack Double-Wythe Brick Walls with Header Bricks. Buildings. 2025; 15(23):4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kıpçak, Fırat. 2025. "Numerical Study of the Out-of-Plane Response of Dry-Stack Double-Wythe Brick Walls with Header Bricks" Buildings 15, no. 23: 4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234342

APA Style

Kıpçak, F. (2025). Numerical Study of the Out-of-Plane Response of Dry-Stack Double-Wythe Brick Walls with Header Bricks. Buildings, 15(23), 4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop