Next Article in Journal
The Museumification of Immovable Cultural Heritage: Insights from the Jin Dynasty Sansheng Pagoda in China
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Embedded Integrated Smart Elements and Coda Wave Analysis for Investigating GGBS Effects on Cement Hydration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Research on 2-Methylimidazole-Lanthanum Nickel-Based Sol-Gel Conversion Coating for Oxide Scale Reinforcement Bars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Simplified Empirical Model for Predicting Residual Flexural Capacity of Corroded Prestressed Concrete Beams

by
Mshtaq Ahmed
*,
Ahmed K. El-Sayed
*,
Abdulrahman M. Alhozaimy
and
Abdulaziz I. Al-Negheimish
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(23), 4310; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234310 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 October 2025 / Revised: 22 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 27 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Corrosion Resistance of Reinforced Concrete)

Abstract

Prestressed concrete (PSC) beams are widely used in critical infrastructure but are highly susceptible to corrosion in aggressive environments, which can significantly compromise their structural performance. Accurate prediction of residual flexural capacity is crucial for evaluating the safety and serviceability of corroded PSC elements. This study presents a simplified empirical model for estimating the residual flexural strength of corroded PSC beams, with maximum strand mass loss serving as the key governing parameter. This approach is superior to existing models, which typically rely on average mass loss and fail to capture the localized stress concentrations induced by pitting corrosion. The model was developed from an experimental dataset of 31 corroded beams, covering maximum mass loss up to 90% using exponential regression. An extensive database of 124 test results from 19 independent studies was used for the purpose of verification and comparison with existing models. The proposed model was capable of effectively capturing the degradation trend and providing accurate and conservative predictions, with an average experimental-to-calculated capacity ratio of 1.04 and a coefficient of variation of 8.7%. Its direct reliance on maximum mass loss, which can be indirectly inferred from corrosion-induced crack widths, significantly enhances the practicality and safety of the model for field condition assessments and life-cycle management of PSC structures.
Keywords: prestressed concrete beams; corrosion; residual flexural capacity; maximum mass loss; simplified empirical model prestressed concrete beams; corrosion; residual flexural capacity; maximum mass loss; simplified empirical model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmed, M.; El-Sayed, A.K.; Alhozaimy, A.M.; Al-Negheimish, A.I. A Simplified Empirical Model for Predicting Residual Flexural Capacity of Corroded Prestressed Concrete Beams. Buildings 2025, 15, 4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234310

AMA Style

Ahmed M, El-Sayed AK, Alhozaimy AM, Al-Negheimish AI. A Simplified Empirical Model for Predicting Residual Flexural Capacity of Corroded Prestressed Concrete Beams. Buildings. 2025; 15(23):4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmed, Mshtaq, Ahmed K. El-Sayed, Abdulrahman M. Alhozaimy, and Abdulaziz I. Al-Negheimish. 2025. "A Simplified Empirical Model for Predicting Residual Flexural Capacity of Corroded Prestressed Concrete Beams" Buildings 15, no. 23: 4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234310

APA Style

Ahmed, M., El-Sayed, A. K., Alhozaimy, A. M., & Al-Negheimish, A. I. (2025). A Simplified Empirical Model for Predicting Residual Flexural Capacity of Corroded Prestressed Concrete Beams. Buildings, 15(23), 4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop