Next Article in Journal
Combustion Performance of Commonly Used Softwood Species Glulam in Timber Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Protection of Low-Strength Shallow-Founded Buildings Around Deep Excavation: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Soft Soil Area
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bibliometric Analysis of the Intersection of Circular Economy, Prefabrication, and Modularity in the Building Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Strengthening the Policy Landscape for BIM Adoption for Construction Work Health and Safety

by
Jimoh Enola Olaogbebikan
1,
Zelinna Pablo
1,* and
Kerry London
2
1
Centre for Healthy Sustainable Development, Torrens University Australia, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
2
School of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(22), 4095; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224095 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 September 2025 / Revised: 23 October 2025 / Accepted: 6 November 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025

Abstract

Studies show that BIM has compelling benefits for work health and safety performance. Its capabilities for visualisation, information management, collaboration and simulation make it a powerful enabler for enhancing training, hazard identification, risk management and site monitoring. However, BIM adoption is inconsistent, even in advanced countries such as the United Kingdom, Finland and Singapore. While significant work has been conducted on technical, organisational and cultural features of BIM solutions, there is a lack of literature on conceptual and empirical studies on government policy that could strengthen BIM adoption. Our study investigated the Australian policy landscape to encourage widespread BIM adoption for improved work health and safety performance. This study had two research questions: (1) To what extent does the Australian policy landscape support the adoption of BIM for work health and safety? (2) What changes can be made to the policy landscape to better support the adoption of BIM for work health and safety? This study employed interpretivism and in-depth qualitative methods. We addressed the first research question with an explanatory model comprising 19 interrelated barriers, and the second with another explanatory model showing diverse strategies across six interrelated types of policy instruments, leading to outcomes that strengthen BIM adoption.
Keywords: building information modelling; policy; BIM adoption barriers; policy instruments building information modelling; policy; BIM adoption barriers; policy instruments

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olaogbebikan, J.E.; Pablo, Z.; London, K. Strengthening the Policy Landscape for BIM Adoption for Construction Work Health and Safety. Buildings 2025, 15, 4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224095

AMA Style

Olaogbebikan JE, Pablo Z, London K. Strengthening the Policy Landscape for BIM Adoption for Construction Work Health and Safety. Buildings. 2025; 15(22):4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olaogbebikan, Jimoh Enola, Zelinna Pablo, and Kerry London. 2025. "Strengthening the Policy Landscape for BIM Adoption for Construction Work Health and Safety" Buildings 15, no. 22: 4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224095

APA Style

Olaogbebikan, J. E., Pablo, Z., & London, K. (2025). Strengthening the Policy Landscape for BIM Adoption for Construction Work Health and Safety. Buildings, 15(22), 4095. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15224095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop