Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Ventilation Performance in Large-Section Highway Tunnels: The Role of Deflector Shields in Jet Fan Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Urban Built Environment in Enhancing Cardiovascular Health in Chinese Cities: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Impact Resistance Test and Numerical Simulation Study of Scrap Steel Fiber Rubber Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of CNT-Enhanced Steel-Reinforced Concrete to Reduce the Impact of Water Management Facilities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gender Differences in Visual Perception of Park Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: A Case Study of Beihai Park in Beijing

1
School of Architecture and Art, Hebei University of Architecture, Zhangjiakou 075031, China
2
Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center of Green Buildings, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(16), 2858; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162858
Submission received: 7 June 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 10 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Health, Wellbeing and Urban Design)

Abstract

Previous landscape design mostly relies on general standards, failing to fully consider gender differences in landscape visual perception, with relevant research still needing further exploration. This study takes Beijing’s Beihai Park as the research object, using five types of on-site-collected photos (water landscape, plant landscape, architectural landscape, path landscape, and square landscape) as stimuli. Twenty males and twenty females participated in an eye-tracking experiment and a questionnaire survey to analyze gender differences in the visual perception of these five landscapes. The results show the following: (1) females show a “core–radiation” pattern, focusing on mid-short vision and environmental details; males focus on distant views and functional areas. (2) Females have slightly higher APD and fixation counts, with stronger cognitive/emotional fluctuations; males have longer total fixation time and more sustained attention. (3) Males prefer architectural/square landscapes, emphasizing functionality; females favor water/plant landscapes, prioritizing emotional connection with nature. (4) The total fixation time significantly impacts subjective evaluations; the average fixation duration is gender-neutral but uniquely affects evaluations of certain landscape types. This study has guiding significance for enhancing park landscapes’ inclusiveness and attractiveness, promoting different genders’ participation and satisfaction, and boosting space vitality and utilization efficiency.
Keywords: Beihai Park; eye-tracking; gender differences; landscape visual perception Beihai Park; eye-tracking; gender differences; landscape visual perception

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, G.; Cao, S.; Chen, S.; Tian, X.; Cao, M. Gender Differences in Visual Perception of Park Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: A Case Study of Beihai Park in Beijing. Buildings 2025, 15, 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162858

AMA Style

Jiang G, Cao S, Chen S, Tian X, Cao M. Gender Differences in Visual Perception of Park Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: A Case Study of Beihai Park in Beijing. Buildings. 2025; 15(16):2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Guaini, Shangwu Cao, Si Chen, Xin Tian, and Min Cao. 2025. "Gender Differences in Visual Perception of Park Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: A Case Study of Beihai Park in Beijing" Buildings 15, no. 16: 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162858

APA Style

Jiang, G., Cao, S., Chen, S., Tian, X., & Cao, M. (2025). Gender Differences in Visual Perception of Park Landscapes Based on Eye-Tracking Technology: A Case Study of Beihai Park in Beijing. Buildings, 15(16), 2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162858

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop