Next Article in Journal
Viscoelastic and Damping Behavior of Composed Modified Asphalt for Functional Interlayers in Photovoltaic Pavements
Previous Article in Journal
The Economics of Adaptive Reuse—Comparative Cost Analysis of Revitalization vs. Demolition and Reconstruction at Radex Park Marywilska
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Microclimatic Performance of Elevated Open Spaces for Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Cold Climate Zones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Enhancing Outdoor Environmental Comfort: A Review of Façade-Surface Strategies and Microclimate Impacts

1
College of Architecture and Planning, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
2
Department of Design, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Buildings 2025, 15(16), 2829; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162829 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 6 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 9 August 2025

Abstract

Building façades traditionally focus on enhancing indoor environmental quality and improving energy performance, but undermine their influence on Outdoor Environmental Comfort (OEC), including thermal, acoustic, and visual conditions. With technological advancements in envelope design, research on new materials and green systems has been introduced in the last few decades. This review examines the role of two key elements—façade materials and green façades—in shaping OEC. A total of 41 peer-reviewed studies (24 on urban scale and 17 on building scale) were categorized into three focus areas: (1) outdoor thermal comfort; (2) outdoor acoustic comfort; and (3) outdoor visual comfort. The analysis was structured across three levels: (a) Performance Determinants; (b) Metrics/Models; and (c) Material or Façade Types. We proposed this analytical structure to highlight the interactions between building façades and OEC domains (thermal, acoustic, and visual comfort). Our results showed façade treatment can impact all three comfort factors related to OEC, but trade-offs must be evaluated. Moreover, the findings highlighted that additional research is required to cover variations in both climate and context conditions, due to their close association with the OEC. Finally, the conceptual framework is presented to synthesize the three comfort domains for sustainable outdoor environments.
Keywords: outdoor comfort; building façade; materials; green façade; envelope outdoor comfort; building façade; materials; green façade; envelope

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, Z.; Ghiai, M. Enhancing Outdoor Environmental Comfort: A Review of Façade-Surface Strategies and Microclimate Impacts. Buildings 2025, 15, 2829. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162829

AMA Style

Khan Z, Ghiai M. Enhancing Outdoor Environmental Comfort: A Review of Façade-Surface Strategies and Microclimate Impacts. Buildings. 2025; 15(16):2829. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Zahida, and Mehdi Ghiai. 2025. "Enhancing Outdoor Environmental Comfort: A Review of Façade-Surface Strategies and Microclimate Impacts" Buildings 15, no. 16: 2829. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162829

APA Style

Khan, Z., & Ghiai, M. (2025). Enhancing Outdoor Environmental Comfort: A Review of Façade-Surface Strategies and Microclimate Impacts. Buildings, 15(16), 2829. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop