Next Article in Journal
Review of Recent Developments Regarding the Durability Performance of Eco-Friendly Geopolymer Concrete
Next Article in Special Issue
Active Green Constructions and Their Impact on Gray Infrastructure
Previous Article in Journal
Dual-Level Framework for OpenBIM-Enabled Design Collaboration
Previous Article in Special Issue
To What Extent Could Alternative Economic Models Increase Investment in the Renovation of and Reduce Energy Poverty in Social Housing in Flanders?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Sectoral Environmental Product Declarations as a Data Source for Life Cycle Assessment

1
Advanced and Sustainable Construction Research Group, Eduardo Torroja Institute of Construction Sciences, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), 28006 Madrid, Spain
2
ERSAF Research Group, School of Agricultural and Forestry Engineering, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2023, 13(12), 3032; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123032
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 3 December 2023 / Published: 5 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges Posed by Climate Change to the Building Industry)

Abstract

The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the quantification of the environmental status in the building sector following new legislative frameworks. Countries need to quantify and assess their environmental impacts as a previous step to regulation and decision-making. In this context, based on a consensus with manufacturers, standardized national data sets are being developed, referred to as sectoral environmental product declarations (EPDs). This study assesses these EPDs with the aim of providing relevant information for global decision-making, focusing on their consistency and shortcomings. An assessment was carried out at both the national level, considering all sectoral EPDs and declared products, and at the international level, with three common building materials (brick, steel, and concrete). The results highlight the lack of traceability in the development and assessment of uncertainty, resulting in substantial discrepancies in reported impacts, especially in the later stages of the life cycle (up to 90% difference). Meanwhile, impacts such as global warming potential or total renewable and non-renewable primary energy use show homogeneous values in the cradle-to-gate stages, with differences generally being under 10%. The analysis of sectoral EPDs should act as a guideline for designing buildings with environmental sustainability criteria, as the last section of this study attempts to highlight.
Keywords: environmental product declaration; life cycle assessment; generic databases; environmental impacts; uncertainty; product category rules (PCRs) environmental product declaration; life cycle assessment; generic databases; environmental impacts; uncertainty; product category rules (PCRs)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otero, M.S.; Garnica, T.; Montilla, S.; Conde, M.; Tenorio, J.A. Analysis of Sectoral Environmental Product Declarations as a Data Source for Life Cycle Assessment. Buildings 2023, 13, 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123032

AMA Style

Otero MS, Garnica T, Montilla S, Conde M, Tenorio JA. Analysis of Sectoral Environmental Product Declarations as a Data Source for Life Cycle Assessment. Buildings. 2023; 13(12):3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otero, María Seila, Teresa Garnica, Soledad Montilla, Marta Conde, and José A. Tenorio. 2023. "Analysis of Sectoral Environmental Product Declarations as a Data Source for Life Cycle Assessment" Buildings 13, no. 12: 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123032

APA Style

Otero, M. S., Garnica, T., Montilla, S., Conde, M., & Tenorio, J. A. (2023). Analysis of Sectoral Environmental Product Declarations as a Data Source for Life Cycle Assessment. Buildings, 13(12), 3032. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13123032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop