Next Article in Journal
Constrained Mode–Damping Solvent Extraction Combined Method for the Soil Incorporation into a Real-Time Hybrid Test of the Soil–Structure System
Previous Article in Journal
Production of the Traditional Organic Mortars of Padmanabhapuram Palace—A Characterization Study on the Simulated Mortars for Their Compatibility
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Study on Mix Proportion Design Based on Strength and Sulfate Resistance of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete

Buildings 2022, 12(9), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091467
by Haizhou Li 1,2,3,4, Jianping Liu 5, Fujiao Chu 1 and Lu Zhang 2,3,4,5,*
Reviewer 1:
Buildings 2022, 12(9), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12091467
Submission received: 15 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Building Materials, and Repair & Renovation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This article studied the strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete. The overall merit of this work is average. The authors should consider the comments attached in the pdf file before proceeding to the publication phase.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Study on mix proportion design based on strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete”. (Manuscript ID: buildings-1891636). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, and are of important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet your expectations. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1- The abstract is poor and needs to be rewritten

2- More references to be added to the introduction and I recommend adding the following

  •  
  • DOI: 
  • 10.34910/MCE.101.2

3- More details about the tests carried out out with detailed photos

4- English written is very poor and must be improved

Author Response

Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Study on mix proportion design based on strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete”. (Manuscript ID: buildings-1891636). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, and are of important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet your expectations. 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I recommend publishing the article in Buildings

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors addressed the reviewer comments

Back to TopTop