Review Reports
- Haizhou Li1,2,3,4,
- Jianping Liu5 and
- Fujiao Chu1
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Ali Jahami Reviewer 2: Mu'tasim Abdel-jaber
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
This article studied the strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete. The overall merit of this work is average. The authors should consider the comments attached in the pdf file before proceeding to the publication phase.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Study on mix proportion design based on strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete”. (Manuscript ID: buildings-1891636). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, and are of important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet your expectations.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
1- The abstract is poor and needs to be rewritten
2- More references to be added to the introduction and I recommend adding the following
3- More details about the tests carried out out with detailed photos
4- English written is very poor and must be improved
Author Response
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Study on mix proportion design based on strength and sulfate resistance of 100 % recycled aggregate concrete”. (Manuscript ID: buildings-1891636). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, and are of important guiding significance to our research. We have studied the comments carefully and have made corrections which we hope meet your expectations.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I recommend publishing the article in Buildings
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors addressed the reviewer comments