Next Article in Journal
Stability Analysis of the Inclined Capillary Barrier Covers under Rainfall Condition
Next Article in Special Issue
Fragility Functions for Reinforced Concrete Structures Based on Multiscale Approach for Earthquake Damage Criteria
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis of the Seismic Behavior of a Steel Beam-to-Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column Connection Using External Diaphragms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seismic Performance Target and Fragility of Masonry Infilled RC Frames under In-Plane Loading
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures

1
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China
2
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Ministry of Emergency Management, Harbin 150080, China
3
School of Civil Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
4
School of Civil Engineering, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2022, 12(8), 1219; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081219
Submission received: 25 July 2022 / Revised: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Earthquake Engineering and Urban Resilience)

Abstract

Reinforced concrete (RC) frames are designed based on the strong column-weak beam (SCWB) philosophy to reduce structural damage and collapse during earthquakes. The SCWB design philosophy is ensured by the required minimum flexural strength ratio of columns to beams (FSRCB) in the seismic code. Quantifying the relationship between the FSRCB and the collapse capacity of the frames may facilitate the efficient assessment of the seismic performance of the existing or newly designed RC frames. This paper investigates the influence of different FSRCBs on the collapse capacity of three- and nine-story RC frames designed according to Chinese seismic codes. The results show that the collapse capacities of the RC frames can be efficiently improved by increasing the FSRCB, and the collapse capacities of frames with FSRCB = 2.0 are improved by approximately 1.6–2.0 times compared with those of the frames with FSRCB = 1.2. Compared with the middle- or high-rise (nine-story) frames, it is more efficient to improve the collapse capacity for low-rise (three-story) frames by increasing the value of CBFSR. The logarithmic standard deviation of the collapse capacity of the RC frames designed according to the Chinese seismic codes ranges from 0.5–0.9, which is larger than the proposed maximum logarithmic standard deviation (0.4) in FEMA P695.
Keywords: RC frame; collapse capacity; strong column-weak beam; flexural strength ratio of columns to beams RC frame; collapse capacity; strong column-weak beam; flexural strength ratio of columns to beams

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gong, M.; Liu, B.; Zuo, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, H. The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures. Buildings 2022, 12, 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081219

AMA Style

Gong M, Liu B, Zuo Z, Sun J, Zhang H. The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures. Buildings. 2022; 12(8):1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gong, Maosheng, Bo Liu, Zhanxuan Zuo, Jing Sun, and Hao Zhang. 2022. "The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures" Buildings 12, no. 8: 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081219

APA Style

Gong, M., Liu, B., Zuo, Z., Sun, J., & Zhang, H. (2022). The Influence of the Flexural Strength Ratio of Columns to Beams on the Collapse Capacity of RC Frame Structures. Buildings, 12(8), 1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop