Value of Technical Wear and Costs of Restoring Performance Characteristics to Residential Buildings
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Main Objectives of the Proposed Method
3. Functions Describing the Aging Process of a Building
- t—service life of a component,
- T—life span of a component.
- t—service life of a component,
- T—life span of a component.
4. Building Constructed Using Traditional Technology—Case Study
5. Value of Technical Wear and the Decrease in Performance Characteristics
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bucoń, R.; Sobotka, A. Decision-making model for choosing residential building repair variants. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2015, 21, 893–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowogońska, B. Diagnoses in the Aging Process of Residential Buildings Constructed Using Traditional Technology. Buildings 2019, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prieto, A.J.; Vásquez, V.; Silva, A.; Horn, A.; Alejandre, F.J.; Macías-Bernal, J.M. Protection value and functional service life of heritage timber buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 2019, 47, 567–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacasse, M.A. Advances in service life prediction—An overview of durability and methods of service life prediction for non-structural building components. In Proceedings of the Annual Australasian Corrosion Association Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 16–19 November 2008; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, A.; de Brito, J.; Gaspar, P.L. Methodologies for Service Life Prediction of Buildings; Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume VII, p. 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucoń, R. Model supporting decisions on renovation and modernization of public utility buildings. Open Eng. 2019, 1, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zavadskas, E.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Kapliński, O. Multi-criteria decision making in civil engineering: Part I—A state-of-the-art survey. Eng. Struct. Technol. 2016, 7, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, N.; Re Cecconi, F. A Cross-Domain Decision Support System to Optimize Building Maintenance. Buildings 2019, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ortega, L.; Serrano, B.; Fran, J.M. Proposed method of estimating the service life of building envelopes. Revis. Constr. 2015, 14, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prieto, A.J.; Silva, A. Service life prediction and environmental exposure conditions of timber claddings in South Chile. Build. Res. Inf. 2019, 48, 191–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulo, P.; Branco, F.; Brito, J.; Silva, A. Buildings Life—The use of genetic algorithms for maintenance plan optimization. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 121, 84–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matulionis, R.C.; Freitag, J.C. Preventive Maintenance of Buildings; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Colen, I.F.; de Brito, J. Discussion of proactive maintenance strategies in facade’s coatings of social hoisin. J. Build. Apprais. 2010, 5, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanier, D.; Tesfamariam, S.; Sadiq, R.; Lounis, Z. Decision models to prioritize maintenance and renewal alternatives. In Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montréal, QC, Canada, 14–16 June 2006; pp. 2594–2604. [Google Scholar]
- Biolek, V.; Hanák, T. LCC Estimation Model: A Construction Material Perspective. Buildings 2019, 9, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yi-Kai, J.; Nai-Pin, H. BIM-Based Approach to Simulate Building Adaptive Performance and Life Cycle Costs for an Open Building Design. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paulo, P.; Branco, F.; Brito, J. Buildings Life: A building management system. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2014, 10, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frangopol, D.M.; Lin, K.-Y.; Estes, A.C. Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1997, 123, 1390–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anysz, H.; Krzemiński, M. Cost approach to the flow-shop construction scheduling. In the E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2018, Petersburg, Russia, 10–12 December 2018; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018; p. 02048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drozd, W.; Leśniak, A. Ecological Wall Systems as an Element of Sustainable Development—Cost Issues. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leśniak, A.; Zima, K. Cost Calculation of Construction Projects Including Sustainability Factors Using the Case Based Reasoning (CBR) Method. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Flores-Colen, I.; de Brito, J.; Freitas, V. Discussion of Criteria for Prioritization of Predictive Maintenance of Building Façades: Survey of 30 Experts. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2009, 24, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flanagan, R.; Kendell, A.; Norman, G.; Robinson, G.D. Life cycle costing and risk management. Constr. Manag. Econ. 1987, 5, S53–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macedo, M.; de Brito, J.; Silva, A.; Oliveira Cruz, C. Design of an Insurance Policy Model Applied to Natural Stone Facade Claddings. Buildings 2019, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wieczorek, D.; Plebankiewicz, E.; Zima, K. Model estimation of the whole life cost of a building with respect to risk factors. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2019, 25, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vanier, D.J.; Lacasse, M.A. BELCAM project: Service life, durability, and asset management research. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Stockholm, Sweden, 19–23 May 1996; pp. 848–856. [Google Scholar]
- Lounis, Z.; Vanier, D.J.; Lacasse, M.A. A discrete stochastic model for performance prediction of roofing systems. In Proceedings of the CIB World Congress, Gävle, Sweden, 7–12 June 1998; pp. 305–313. [Google Scholar]
- Christen, M.; Schroeder, J.; Wallbaum, H. Evaluation of strategic building maintenance and refurbishment budgeting method Schroeder. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2014, 18, 393–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rivera-Gómez, H.; Oscar Montaño-Arango, O.; Corona-Armenta, J.R.; Garnica-González, J.; Hernández-Gress, E.S.; Barragán-Vite, I. Production and Maintenance Planning for a Deteriorating System with Operation-Dependent Defectives. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudbeck, K. Methods for Designing Building Envelope Components Prepared for Repair and Maintenance; Department of Buildings and Energy, Technical University of Denmark: Lyngby, Denmark, 1999; p. R-035. [Google Scholar]
- Morelli, M.; Lacasse, M.A. A systematic methodology for design of retrofit actions with longevity. J. Build. Phys. 2019, 42, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alshubbak, A.; Pellicer, E.; Catala, J.; Teixeira, J. A Model for identifying owner’s needs in the building life cycle. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2015, 21, 1046–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, C.J.; Juan, Y.K.; Hsu, Y.H. Developing a systematic approach to evaluate and predict building service life. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2017, 23, 890–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 7162:1992 Performance Standards in Building—Contents and Format of Standards for Evaluation of Performance. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/13758.html (accessed on 8 January 2020).
- ISO 19208:2016 Framework for Specifying Performance in Buildings. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/63999.html (accessed on 8 January 2020).
- ISO 15686-2:2012 Buildings and Constructed Assets—Service Life Planning—Part 2: Service Life Prediction Procedures. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/51826.html (accessed on 8 January 2020).
- Nowogońska, B. The Method of Predicting the Extent of Changes in the Performance Characteristics of Residential Buildings. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2019, 65, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korentz, J.; Nowogońska, B. Assessment of the life cycle of masonry walls in residential buildings. In Proceedings of the Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering ECCE Opole, MATEC Web of Conferences, Opole, Poland, 23–25 April 2018; Volume 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nowogońska, B.; Korentz, J. Value of Technical Wear and Costs of Restoring Performance Characteristics to Residential Buildings. Buildings 2020, 10, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010009
Nowogońska B, Korentz J. Value of Technical Wear and Costs of Restoring Performance Characteristics to Residential Buildings. Buildings. 2020; 10(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleNowogońska, Beata, and Jacek Korentz. 2020. "Value of Technical Wear and Costs of Restoring Performance Characteristics to Residential Buildings" Buildings 10, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010009
APA StyleNowogońska, B., & Korentz, J. (2020). Value of Technical Wear and Costs of Restoring Performance Characteristics to Residential Buildings. Buildings, 10(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010009