Next Article in Journal
Microstructure-Informed Prediction of Transformation Products in C-Mn and C-Mn-Nb Steels for Data-Driven Process-Window Design
Previous Article in Journal
Rate Constants of the Initial Reduction of a Single Iron Ore Pellet by CO-H2 Gas Mixture
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Situ Network-like Bimodal Structure for Superior Strength-Ductility Synergy in WE43 Magnesium Alloy Fabricated via Powder Metallurgy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

From Microstructure to Mechanical Performance: Characterization of Similar and Dissimilar Welds in Cast, Wrought, and LPBF Aluminum Alloys

1
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Brescia, via Branze 38, 25123 Brescia, BS, Italy
2
Streparava SpA, Via Zocco 13, 25030 Adro, BS, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2026, 16(9), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/met16091046 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 July 2026 / Revised: 14 September 2026 / Accepted: 17 September 2026 / Published: 20 September 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Light Metals for Automotive Applications)

Abstract

Hybrid lightweight structures increasingly combine cast, wrought, and additively manufactured aluminum alloys, but the mechanical response of their welded joints remains strongly material-dependent. In this study, cast EN AC-42100-T6, wrought EN AW-6082-T6, and laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) AlSi10Mg stress-relieved plates were welded in 4 and 8 mm configurations using cold metal transfer and pulsed multi-control processes over two campaigns. Weld defects, microstructure, hardness profiles, and tensile properties were analyzed using a framework combining a hardness derived local yield-stress descriptor (σy,loc), a cumulative hardness deficit (IDHV), and a porosity increment metric (ΔP). The second campaign eliminated fusion and penetration related defects, but did not mitigate fusion zone porosity in LPBF-related joints, which reached 13.7% in the 8 mm LPBF–Cast joint. Hardness analysis showed the widest hardness-affected region in the wrought alloy, an intermediate response in the cast alloy, and localized alteration in LPBF. Tensile results identified three degradation modes: strength loss associated with heat-affected zone (HAZ) softening in wrought-containing joints, ductility limitation associated with the initial cast condition, and porosity-associated ductility loss in LPBF-related joints. The lower yield strength reduction in LPBF-related joints does not imply improved performance, as fracture remains strongly influenced by fusion zone porosity. The results support material specific mitigation and design strategies for hybrid welded aluminum structures.
Keywords: aluminum alloys; welding; AlSi10Mg; porosity; microhardness; tensile properties aluminum alloys; welding; AlSi10Mg; porosity; microhardness; tensile properties

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bologna, O.; Cecchel, S.; Ferraresi, R.; Cornacchia, G. From Microstructure to Mechanical Performance: Characterization of Similar and Dissimilar Welds in Cast, Wrought, and LPBF Aluminum Alloys. Metals 2026, 16, 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16091046

AMA Style

Bologna O, Cecchel S, Ferraresi R, Cornacchia G. From Microstructure to Mechanical Performance: Characterization of Similar and Dissimilar Welds in Cast, Wrought, and LPBF Aluminum Alloys. Metals. 2026; 16(9):1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16091046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bologna, Omar, Silvia Cecchel, Riccardo Ferraresi, and Giovanna Cornacchia. 2026. "From Microstructure to Mechanical Performance: Characterization of Similar and Dissimilar Welds in Cast, Wrought, and LPBF Aluminum Alloys" Metals 16, no. 9: 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16091046

APA Style

Bologna, O., Cecchel, S., Ferraresi, R., & Cornacchia, G. (2026). From Microstructure to Mechanical Performance: Characterization of Similar and Dissimilar Welds in Cast, Wrought, and LPBF Aluminum Alloys. Metals, 16(9), 1046. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16091046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop