Next Article in Journal
Influence of Punch Shape on Joint Strength in Forge Joining of Al-Si-Coated 22MnB5 Steel During Hot Stamping and Application to Hat Bending
Previous Article in Journal
Thermal, Microstructural, and Morphological Analysis of Co-Ni-Ce Microalloyed SAC305 Lead-Free Solder Solidified at Low Cooling Rate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multidimensional Ternary Conductive Network for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes

Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Power Batteries, Energy Storage Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2026, 16(4), 375; https://doi.org/10.3390/met16040375
Submission received: 9 March 2026 / Revised: 24 March 2026 / Accepted: 25 March 2026 / Published: 28 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced High-Energy Metal-Ion Batteries)

Abstract

Constructing efficient conductive networks is essential to overcome the intrinsically low electronic conductivity of LiFePO4 cathodes. Previous studies have demonstrated that different conductive agents possess distinct electrical conduction mechanisms. The synergistic integration of multiple types of conductive agents can achieve more favorable conductive performance. Nevertheless, most relevant studies are still limited to binary conductive systems, and the synergistic mechanism among various conductive agents has not been systematically investigated and deeply analyzed. In this work, a multidimensional ternary conductive system composed of Super P carbon black (SP), graphene (GN), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was systematically optimized to regulate electron and ion transport pathways. By adjusting the relative proportions of SP, GN, and CNTs, the evolution of conductive network structure and its impact on electrochemical performance were investigated, and the optimized composition (SP/GN/CNTs = 50/15/35, denoted as S5GC37) was identified. The results reveal that the multidimensional conductive framework formed by S5GC37 effectively integrates short-range ion diffusion with long-range electron transport, leading to reduced polarization, suppressed surface oxidation, and enhanced charge transport kinetics. As a result, the LiFePO4 electrode with S5GC37 delivers an initial discharge capacity of 164.8 mAh·g−1 and maintains 151.9 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at 1C. Even at 3C, a capacity retention of 83.2% is achieved after 200 cycles, demonstrating excellent rate capability and cycling stability. These findings highlight the importance of multidimensional conductive network design for high-performance LiFePO4 batteries.

1. Introduction

The increasing reliance on fossil fuels has raised serious concerns regarding resource depletion and environmental pollution, stimulating the development of sustainable energy storage technologies [1]. Supercapacitors are regarded as promising candidates for next-generation energy storage devices owing to their outstanding advantages, including high safety, excellent reliability and environmental benignity. Nevertheless, their intrinsic drawbacks, such as relatively low energy density and operating voltage, as well as severe self-discharge behavior, have severely impeded their practical application and further development [2]. Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have attracted significant attention owing to their high energy density, long cycle life, and environmental compatibility [3,4]. Among various cathode materials, LiFePO4 is widely used due to its excellent safety and structural stability. However, its intrinsically low electronic conductivity leads to energy loss, heat generation, and limited rate capability [5,6,7]. With the rapid development of electric vehicles, improving the fast charge/discharge performance of LiFePO4 batteries has become increasingly important [8]. Various strategies such as doping, coating, and material design have been proposed to enhance the conductivity of LiFePO4, but these approaches often involve complex processes and increased costs [9,10,11,12]. In comparison, introducing conductive additives to construct efficient conductive networks provides a more practical approach to improve electron transport and ion diffusion within the electrode [13,14]. Conductive additives bridge active materials and the current collector, forming charge transport pathways while enhancing electrolyte accessibility.
Commonly employed conductive agents mainly comprise carbon-based materials and novel conductive polymers, including organic materials based on rylene dyes and conducting and conjugated polymers. Organic materials based on rylene dyes are environmentally benign yet possess extremely low intrinsic conductivity, rendering them suitable only for low-power devices and inappropriate with LiFePO4 [15]. Although doped conducting and conjugated polymers exhibit enhanced conductivity, their high cost and poor stability limit their application to silicon-based anodes [16]. In comparison, carbon conductive agents feature low cost, high conductivity and superior stability, making them the preferred choice for constructing conductive networks.
Typical carbon conductive agents include zero-dimensional carbon black (SP), two-dimensional graphene (GN), and one-dimensional carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Owing to their distinct dimensional structures, these materials exhibit different transport characteristics. SP forms a porous particle network that facilitates ion diffusion but provides limited long-range electronic connectivity. GN possesses highly delocalized π-electrons and excellent intrinsic conductivity, yet its tendency to restack hinders ion transport. CNTs offer long-range electron pathways due to their high aspect ratio, although their relatively sparse junctions may limit the formation of stable conductive networks.
Different conductive agents exhibit disparate electrical conduction mechanisms. The synergistic combination of multiple conductive components affords superior conductivity compared with single-component systems. Therefore, integrating conductive agents with complementary dimensional characteristics offers a promising strategy to simultaneously optimize electron transport and ion diffusion. Nevertheless, current research is primarily concentrated on binary composite systems, and the synergistic effects among diverse conductive agents remain insufficiently investigated. Furthermore, the optimal proportion and loading of conductive agents have not been accurately quantified, while the composite strategy is merely restricted to simple mechanical mixing, which makes it difficult to realize highly efficient electrical conduction [17,18]. In this work, a multidimensional ternary conductive system composed of SP, GN, and CNTs is designed and systematically optimized. By adjusting the relative proportions of the three components, the evolution of conductive network structure and its influence on electrochemical performance are investigated. A variable-control strategy was adopted in this work. Initially, the mass ratio of GN to CNTs was kept constant, while the content of SP in the conductive agent was systematically adjusted. On the basis of the optimal SP content, the ratio of GN to CNTs was further optimized so as to determine the optimal conductive agent formulation for lithium iron phosphate materials. The optimized composition (SP/GN/CNTs = 50/15/35, denoted as S5GC37) achieves a balanced conductive framework, enabling improved charge transport and enhanced electrochemical performance in LiFePO4 electrodes. The LiFePO4 electrode with S5GC37 exhibits an initial discharge capacity of 164.8 mAh·g−1, maintaining 151.9 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at 1C and retaining 83.2% capacity after 200 cycles at 3C, demonstrating improved rate capability and cycling stability.

2. Experimental Section

All conductive agents (SP, GN, and CNTs) tend to agglomerate, particularly graphene due to strong interlayer van der Waals interactions. To improve dispersion, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, 20 wt% relative to the conductive agents) was introduced as a dispersant to reduce surface tension and enhance stability. A combined dispersion strategy involving ultrasonication, mechanical stirring, and homogenization was employed.
The cathode slurry was prepared with a mass ratio of LiFePO4:conductive agent:PVDF = 90:4:6 and a solid content of 42%. The ternary conductive systems are denoted as SxGCyz, where x represents the weight percentage of SP in the total conductive carbon, and y/z corresponds to the mass ratio of GN to CNTs. Firstly, the conductive agents (SP, GN, CNTs or SxGCyz) were stirred and dispersed in the PVDF solution, with 20 wt% PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone) added as a dispersant. Ultrasonic treatment for 5 min was performed every 2 h of stirring, and this process was repeated for 24 h. Afterwards, LiFePO4 powder was introduced, and the mixture was further stirred and sonicated for 24 h following the same procedure. Subsequently, the as-prepared slurry was homogenized at 2000 rpm for 10 min, then uniformly coated onto aluminum foil and dried at 120 °C for 30 min. Finally, the electrodes were assembled into coin-type half-cells for subsequent electrochemical testing. To systematically determine the optimal composition of the ternary conductive network, a two-step compositional screening strategy was employed. First, the proportion of SP was varied (10–90 wt%) while maintaining a fixed GN/CNT ratio (1:1). Subsequently, under the optimal SP content, the relative ratio of GN and CNTs was further adjusted. This stepwise optimization enables clarification of the individual and synergistic contributions of zero-, one-, and two-dimensional conductive carbons.
The structural and morphological properties of the conductive agents were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rikagaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Raman spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis (Beiside Technology Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Tasken Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Field Electron and Ion Company, Hillsboro City, OR, USA). For the electrodes, XRD, SEM, and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (Bruker (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were conducted before and after cycling to evaluate structural evolution and elemental distribution. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was performed on cycled electrodes to analyze surface chemical states and polarization behavior. Electrochemical measurements were carried out at 25 °C after cell assembly and aging. Galvanostatic charge–discharge, cycling performance, rate capability, and differential capacity analyses were performed using a Neware battery testing system (Shenzhen Neware Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) within a voltage window of 2.5–4.2 V. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Metrohm China Limited, Hong Kong, China) was conducted on an Autolab workstation over a frequency range of 10−2 to 106 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of SP, GN, and CNTs, providing a first comparison of their crystallographic features that are directly related to charge-transport behavior in composite electrodes. GN exhibits a sharp and intense (002) reflection, indicative of high crystallinity and well-ordered graphitic stacking, which is consistent with its superior intrinsic electronic conductivity. The appearance of the (004) peak further supports the presence of an ordered layered structure with relatively low stacking thickness. In contrast, the (002) peaks of SP and CNTs shift toward lower diffraction angles, suggesting enlarged interlayer spacing according to Bragg’s law (2d sinθ = nλ). Such an expanded interlayer distance in SP is generally beneficial for electrolyte wetting and Li+ insertion/extraction at the electrode interface, thereby promoting ion transport. CNTs, while also showing a low-angle shift, retain comparatively higher crystallinity than SP, implying more efficient electron conduction along the graphitic framework.
Raman spectra in Figure 1b and Table S1 further highlight differences in the defect density and graphitization degree among these carbon materials. GN shows the lowest intensity ratio between the D band and G band, indicating fewer structural defects and a higher degree of graphitization, followed by CNTs, whereas SP exhibits the highest defect density. In addition, pronounced 2D bands are observed for GN and CNTs but are absent in SP, consistent with their layered/graphitic structures. The stronger 2D feature of GN reflects a more well-defined layered architecture, which favors in-plane electron transport but may also increase the tendency toward restacking when incorporated into electrodes.
Besides crystallinity and defect structure, the electrolyte accessibility of conductive agents is strongly influenced by their surface area and pore structure. As shown in Figure 1c, N2 adsorption measurements yield specific surface areas of 20.9, 14.3, and 195.0 m2·g−1 for SP, GN, and CNTs, respectively. The markedly higher surface area of CNTs originates from their porous tubular morphology and provides abundant sites for electrolyte adsorption, which is favorable for interfacial charge transfer and ion migration. By comparison, GN exhibits a relatively low surface area despite its high crystallinity, mainly due to the restacking of graphene sheets that reduces accessible surface and limits electrolyte penetration.
SEM and TEM analyses in Figure 1d–i provide direct morphological evidence supporting the above interpretations. SP consists of primary nanoparticles (40–55 nm) that aggregate into chain-like secondary structures (Figure 1d). This particle-chain morphology effectively fills interparticle voids in LiFePO4 electrodes, which is beneficial for forming short-range conductive contacts and maintaining open diffusion channels for electrolyte infiltration. GN displays stacked lamellar sheets with lateral sizes of ≈2 μm, which can bridge multiple active particles and enhance mechanical integrity (Figure 1e); however, the tightly stacked nature of the sheets may introduce a steric hindrance effect and locally block Li+ transport. CNTs exhibit a highly oriented tubular morphology with inner and outer diameters of ≈7 and 15 nm, respectively, and a wall thickness of ≈4 nm (Figure 1i). Their high aspect ratio enables long-range conductive pathways, but CNTs may also bundle and form sparse junction networks if not well dispersed, which can limit network continuity and stability.
Taken together, the electrochemical roles of SP, GN, and CNTs can be fundamentally understood from their dimensional structures and contact configurations. SP forms a loosely packed particle network with abundant voids that promotes electrolyte accessibility and facilitates Li+ diffusion, yet its point-to-point contacts can lead to discontinuous electron pathways. GN provides efficient in-plane electron conduction through delocalized π-electrons, but its tendency to restack results in dense regions that hinder ion transport. CNTs, acting as one-dimensional conductive units, create continuous electron pathways over long distances; however, limited interconnection density and aggregation behavior may restrict the formation of a robust percolation network. These intrinsic, structure-dependent transport characteristics explain why single-component systems often exhibit trade-offs between electronic conductivity, ion transport, and long-term stability.
Based on the above structural considerations, an important question is how to integrate these conductive agents to maximize both electron transport and Li+ diffusion while maintaining electrode integrity during cycling. To identify the optimal conductive composition, a systematic electrochemical screening of various SP/GN/CNT ratios was first performed. The performance-guided optimization strategy allows the best-performing composition to be selected for in-depth structural and interfacial characterization, while comparative electrochemical results of other compositions are discussed to validate the selection. The electrochemical results in Figure S1a–f reveal a non-linear dependence of cell performance on SP content when the GN/CNT ratio is fixed at 1:1. At low SP fractions (10–30%), the electrode lacks sufficient short-range conductive contacts, resulting in incomplete conductive networks and limited capacity retention. As the SP proportion increases, polarization gradually decreases, indicating improved charge transfer and more effective local connectivity. When the SP content reaches 50%, the polarization is minimized (ΔE = 0.09 V), and both rate capability and cycling stability are markedly improved. The S5-GC55 sample delivers an initial discharge-specific capacity of 162.4 mAh·g−1 with a stable charge–discharge plateau. After 200 cycles at a 3C rate, the capacity remains 112.7 mAh·g−1 corresponding to a capacity retention of 68.1%. However, excessive SP (>50%) disrupts long-range conductive pathways, since too few one- and two-dimensional conductive components remain to bridge particles and establish continuous networks, leading to increased charge transfer resistance and deteriorated high-rate performance. Notably, the S5GC55 electrode exhibits the lowest charge transfer resistance (Rct) among SP-content series (Rct = 373.7 Ω) and the best overall stability, indicating that 50 wt% SP provides a critical balance between ion diffusion (favored by porous particle packing) and electronic connectivity (requiring long-range bridging).
Under the optimized SP content (50%), the GN/CNT ratio was further tuned to determine the optimal balance between two-dimensional bridging and one-dimensional long-range conduction (Figure S2). Moderate incorporation of GN initially enhances interparticle connectivity and improves the utilization of active material. However, as GN content increases beyond an optimal level, severe restacking becomes more pronounced, which restricts Li+ diffusion and increases polarization. Among the investigated compositions, S5GC37 (GN/CNTs = 3/7) delivers the most balanced performance (Figure S2), exhibiting the lowest polarization (ΔE ≈ 0.1 V) and the smallest charge transfer resistance (Rct = 268.1 Ω). Importantly, it retains 103.6 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at 3C, with a retention rate of 81.4%, demonstrating the robustness of the conductive framework under harsh rate and cycling conditions. In contrast, GN-rich systems (e.g., GC91) suffer from severe capacity decay and extremely poor high-rate performance, which can be attributed to steric hindrance and Li+ trapping within stacked graphene layers. Therefore, S5GC37 was identified as the optimized ternary composition and selected for detailed structural and mechanistic investigation.
To verify that the optimized composition indeed improves structural stability during cycling, the crystal structure and morphology of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents were examined before and after cycling. Figure 2a–d presents the XRD patterns of electrodes containing different conductive systems. Prior to cycling, all diffraction peaks can be indexed to the olivine LiFePO4 phase, confirming that the introduction of conductive additives does not alter the bulk crystal structure. A weak (002) reflection at 26° is observed only in the GN-containing electrode (Figure 2b), whereas it is absent in SP- and CNTs-based systems due to their amorphous or low-crystallinity nature; this feature is also negligible in S5GC37 because of the reduced GN content. After cycling, peak broadening and decreased intensity are observed for all electrodes, accompanied by a slight shift toward lower angles (Figure 2a–d). These changes indicate lattice expansion and increased structural disorder caused by repeated Li+ insertion/extraction and the formation of surface byproducts from electrolyte decomposition. Such evolution is typically associated with capacity fading and increased polarization. Notably, the S5GC37 electrode shows the least attenuation in peak intensity (Figure 2d) while maintaining a comparable peak shift to other systems, suggesting that the optimized conductive network can better accommodate volume changes and suppress structural degradation during prolonged cycling.
SEM images of the electrodes (Figure 2e–h and Figure S3) further illustrate the connection states of LiFePO4 particles with various conductive agents before and after cycling. SP provides point-to-point contact and fills the interparticle voids. GN forms point-to-plane contact with a large contact area, while CNTs act as point-to-line conductive bridges. In comparison, the S5GC37 ternary composite combines these three contact forms, thus forming a more continuous and compact conductive network (Figure 2h). EDS mapping in Figure S4 verifies the above results. Severe carbon agglomeration is observed in the GN-containing electrode, whereas the S5GC37 electrode shows a much more uniform carbon distribution. Such a homogeneous conductive structure can alleviate local current concentration and reduce structural defects, thus helping to maintain better electrode integrity.
To further investigate the surface chemical evolution of the electrodes after cycling, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed (Figure 2i–l and Figure S5). The C 1s spectra in Figure S5 were first analyzed to evaluate the extent of electrolyte decomposition on the electrode surface. The peak corresponding to C=O is mainly attributed to Li2CO3, which is a typical decomposition product of the electrolyte. Therefore, the relative intensity of the C=O peak can be used to estimate the degree of electrolyte decomposition and surface oxidation. As summarized in Table S2, the electrodes containing SP and GN exhibit relatively high proportions of the C=O peak, indicating more severe electrolyte decomposition during cycling. In comparison, the LFP-CNTs electrode shows a noticeably lower C=O peak contribution. Among all samples, the LFP-S5GC37 electrode exhibits the lowest C=O peak proportion of 10.6%, suggesting that the ternary conductive network effectively suppresses electrolyte decomposition and stabilizes the electrode surface. The Fe 2p region provides direct insight into the oxidation state evolution of LiFePO4, where partial oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ during cycling is commonly linked to interfacial degradation and loss of active material. A comparison of Fe3+/Fe2+ ratios in Table S2 reveals pronounced differences among electrodes: the GN-based electrode exhibits the highest oxidation degree, likely due to restacking-induced transport limitations that cause uneven current distribution and local overpotentials. In contrast, the S5GC37 electrode shows the lowest Fe3+/Fe2+ ratio (0.5), indicating suppressed surface oxidation and improved reversibility. Overall, these results suggest that the optimized conductive framework not only improves bulk transport but also stabilizes interfacial reactions by reducing polarization and mitigating side reactions.
Electrochemical measurements further corroborate the structural and interfacial advantages of the ternary conductive network. As shown in Figure 3a,b, the LFP-S5GC37 electrode exhibits a reduced polarization with the smallest redox potential gap (≈0.1 V) and a stable charge–discharge plateau, indicating improved kinetics and decreased internal resistance. It delivers an initial discharge capacity of 164.8 mAh·g−1 with a high initial coulombic efficiency of 96.0%, suggesting effective utilization of the active material and a relatively stable initial electrode/electrolyte interface. In comparison, the LFP-GN electrode shows a significantly enlarged voltage hysteresis, consistent with diffusion barriers caused by graphene restacking and Li+ trapping. The LFP-SP electrode exhibits the lowest capacity, reflecting the limitation of its short-range “point-to-point” conductive pathways that cannot maintain efficient electron transport under high-rate conditions. CNTs-based electrodes perform relatively well at low rates due to their long-range conductive paths; however, their capacity decays rapidly at higher rates, implying that the CNT network alone may be insufficiently dense or mechanically stable to maintain continuous conduction during fast cycling. Rate performance in Figure 3c further highlights these differences. The LFP-S5GC37 electrode maintains higher capacity and retention across all current densities, delivering 121.3 mAh·g−1 after 5 cycles at 3C (74.5% retention). These results indicate that the ternary framework effectively reduces transport polarization under high current, where both rapid electron delivery and fast Li+ redistribution are required.
The first-cycle discharge profiles at 1C (Figure 3d) provide additional evidence for improved kinetics. The LFP-S5GC37 electrode exhibits a flatter voltage plateau, higher operating voltage, and larger discharge capacity, suggesting reduced ohmic and charge-transfer resistance. These advantages translate to higher practical energy output and improved rate capability. Cycling performance at 1C and 3C (Figure 3e,f) confirms the long-term stability of the optimized system. The LFP-S5GC37 electrode maintains 151.9 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at 1C and retains 83.2% capacity after 200 cycles at 3C, demonstrating excellent cycling durability. In contrast, the GN-based electrode suffers from rapid decay due to diffusion limitations and aggravated side reactions, while CNT-based electrodes show moderate stability but remain inferior to the ternary system, consistent with the previously discussed network stability limitations. As listed in Table S3, LFP-S5GC37 significantly outperforms other reported binary conductive network systems in electrochemical performance [19].
The efficient charge storage capability of LFP-S5GC37 can be ascribed to the synergistic optimization of the two-phase lithiation/delithiation reaction and the three-dimensional conductive network. A “point-line-plane” ternary structure is constructed via the combination of SP, CNTs and graphene, which establishes rapid electron transfer pathways and interconnected Li+ diffusion channels throughout the electrode. This structure not only reinforces interparticle electron conduction but also optimizes interfacial wettability and the stability of the SEI film, thereby accelerating charge transfer and ion migration and realizing highly efficient charge storage in the electrode.
To further evaluate the conductivity of the three single conductive agents and the ternary composite conductive agent S5GC37, in situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed for all cells (Figure 4 and Figure S6). The fitted Nyquist plots are shown in Figure 4a,d. As the discharge voltage decreases, the charge transfer resistance, Rct, gradually increases. This behavior can be attributed to the fact that higher voltages favor Li+ deintercalation under the electric field, thereby facilitating charge transfer, whereas lower voltages lead to increased interfacial resistance. A distinct difference is observed for the GN-based electrode. Compared with the other systems, the LFP-GN cell exhibits a characteristic double semicircle in the Nyquist plot. This feature originates from the steric hindrance effect caused by the large lateral size and multilayer stacking of graphene sheets. The diffusion of Li+ ions is severely hindered, leading to the appearance of an additional low-frequency semicircle associated with polarization impedance. In contrast, the LFP-S5GC37 electrode shows a smaller semicircle and lower overall impedance, indicating reduced polarization and improved charge transport.
To further distinguish the electrochemical processes, the distribution of relaxation times (DRT) was calculated for the LFP-GN and LFP-S5GC37 electrodes at different discharge voltages, as shown in Figure 4b,e. The peaks P1 and M1 appear in the ultra-high-frequency region (10−5–10−3 s), corresponding to the contact resistance between electrode components. The peak P2 is unique to the LFP-GN electrode and originates from the steric hindrance effect induced by the large graphene sheets and their multilayer stacking. Peaks P3 and M2 in the high-frequency region correspond to Li+ transport through the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer (RSEI). Peaks P4 and M3 appear in the intermediate-frequency region and are attributed to the charge transfer resistance (Rct), while peaks P5 and M4 in the low-frequency region are related to Warburg diffusion (diffusion impedance) and ion transport at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Compared with the LFP-S5GC37 electrode, the impedance contributions of the LFP-GN electrode are higher in all regions, particularly in the charge transfer and diffusion processes. The variation in charge transfer resistance with voltage for different conductive systems is shown in Figure 4e,f. As the state of charge (SOC) increases, Li+ is gradually extracted from the LiFePO4 lattice, which enhances electrode activity and slightly enlarges the lattice spacing, while the SEI layer becomes more stable. These factors facilitate charge transfer and result in a decreasing Rct with increasing SOC. Among all electrodes, the LFP-GN electrode shows the highest Rct, followed by LFP-SP, whereas the LFP-CNTs electrode exhibits a value close to that of the ternary system. Benefiting from its well-constructed conductive network and structural stability, the LFP-S5GC37 electrode shows the lowest charge transfer resistance. At a discharge voltage of 3.2 V, the Rct of LFP-S5-GC37 reaches 239.8 Ω; this value was considerably smaller than those of the other three samples. The charge-transfer resistance (Rct) of LFP-SP was 677.2 Ω, whereas that of the GN-based electrode reached the maximum value of 1433.16 Ω. This phenomenon can be attributed to its multilayered structure and the steric hindrance effect caused by severe stacking.
Li+ diffusion kinetics were further analyzed using EIS data at 3.2 V. In the low-frequency region, the real impedance (Z′) shows a linear relationship with ω−1/2, from which the Warburg coefficient (σ) can be obtained. As shown in Figure S7, SP exhibits the smallest σ (61.2), indicating the fastest Li+ diffusion due to its porous particle network and open diffusion channels. GN shows the largest σ because restacking introduces steric hindrance and blocks ion transport pathways. The S5GC37 electrode exhibits a σ value slightly higher than that of SP but significantly lower than that of GN (Figure S7), indicating balanced ion transport while maintaining improved electronic connectivity. By integrating multidimensional conductive units, the S5GC37 ternary system balances electron transport and Li+ diffusion while improving structural stability, thereby enabling high-performance LiFePO4 electrodes.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a multidimensional ternary conductive system composed of Super P carbon black (SP), graphene (GN), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was optimized to regulate charge transport in LiFePO4 cathodes. By systematically tuning the conductive composition, the optimal ratio (SP/GN/CNTs = 50/15/35, S5GC37) was identified. This configuration integrates efficient electron pathways and ion diffusion channels, forming a stable conductive network that reduces polarization and improves charge transport kinetics. As a result, the LiFePO4 electrode delivers an initial discharge capacity of 164.8 mAh·g−1 and retains 151.9 mAh·g−1 after 200 cycles at 1C, with 83.2% capacity retention after 200 cycles at 3C. These results highlight the effectiveness of multidimensional conductive network design for high-performance LiFePO4 electrodes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/met16040375/s1, Figure S1: Electrochemical performance of Sx-GC55 (x = 1, 3, 5, 7, 9) cells: (a) differential capacity curves; (b) initial charge–discharge curves; (c) Nyquist plots; (d) rate capability; (e) first discharge curves at 1C; (f) cycling performance at 3C; Figure S2: Electrochemical performance of S5-GCyz (y/z = 1/9, 3/7, 5/5, 7/3, 9/1) cells: (a) differential capacity curves; (b) initial charge–discharge curves; (c) Nyquist plots; (d) rate capability; (e) first discharge curves at 1C; (f) cycling performance at 3C; Figure S3: SEM images of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents after cycling: (a) LFP-SP; (b) LFP-GN; (c) LFP-CNTs; (d) LFP-S5GC37; Figure S4: EDS elemental mapping of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents after cycling: (a) LFP-SP; (b) LFP-GN; (c) LFP-CNTs; (d) LFP-S5GC37; Figure S5: XPS fitting spectra of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents after cycling: (a) LFP-SP; (b) LFP-GN; (c) LFP-CNTs; (d) LFP-S5GC37; Figure S6: Electrochemical impedance characteristics of LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents at various discharge voltages: (a,d) Nyquist plots of LFP-SP and LFP-CNTs; (b,e) DRT spectra of LFP-SP and LFP-CNTs at different discharge voltages; (c) Equivalent circuit diagrams of LFP-SP, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37; (f) Equivalent circuit diagram of LFP-GN; Figure S7; Linear fitting plots of Z’ versus ω−1/2 at 3.2 V for LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents; Figure S8: Digital photos of the coated electrode sheets after two slurry preparation processes: (a) direct slurry preparation; (b) slurry preparation after ultrasonic stirring with PVP added; Table S1: Raman testing results of SP, GN and CNTs; Table S2: XPS fitting parameters of cycled LFP electrodes with different conductive agents; Table S3: Compared with the performance of other literature.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z., G.D., Q.H., T.Y. and S.Z.; Methodology, F.Z., G.D., T.Y., J.D. and S.Z.; Software, F.Z.; Validation, F.Z.; Formal analysis, F.Z., G.D. and Q.H.; Investigation, F.Z., G.D., Q.H., J.D. and S.Z.; Resources, S.Z.; Data curation, F.Z.; Writing—original draft, F.Z.; Writing—review and editing, F.Z. and S.Z.; Visualization, F.Z.; Supervision, G.D., T.Y. and S.Z.; Project administration, F.Z. and S.Z.; Funding acquisition, S.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Project for the Technological Maturation and Engineeringization of Scientific Achievements in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 2024003).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors also express their gratitude to the Key Laboratory of Power Batteries and Materials of Jiangxi University of Technology and the Ganzhou Kangda New Energy Materials Co., Ltd. for providing raw materials and support in battery preparation and testing. The authors sincerely thank the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their support in conducting XPS tests, and thank Zhou for his assistance in EIS and DRT analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mink, G.; Killebrew, J.; Deibert, A.; Handy, E.; Haller, M.; Kittner, N. Sand thermal energy storage: Technology, economics, environmental sustainability, and deployment strategies. J. Energy Storage 2026, 146, 120166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qian, S.M.; Cheng, E.; Kakarelidis, O.; Nguyen, S.; Shaffer, M.S.; Kucernak, A.R.; Panesar, A.; Greenhalgh, E.S. Multiscale modelling of supercapacitors with hierarchical structure. J. Power Sources 2026, 665, 238956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, J.Z.; Wang, F.; Guo, H.; Wu, K.; Xie, J.; Sun, X.; Tian, J.; Zhuang, W. Surface engineering of lithium-rich manganese-based cathodes: Unlocking high capacity and long cycle life in lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 523, 168905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, H.H.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.Q.; Zhao, F.; Cao, Z.; Cavallo, L.; Li, Q.; Ming, J. Solvent-Solvent Interaction Mediated Lithium-Ion (De)intercalation Chemistry in Propylene Carbonate Based Electrolytes for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 18062−18073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gao, C.K.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, Z.P.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H. Nitrogen-doped carbon coated LiFePO4 with enhanced Lithium extraction kinetics and cyclic stability for efficient Lithium recovery. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2026, 390, 136934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, J.H.; Onah, O.E.; Cheng, Y.; Silva, K.J.; Choi, C.H.W.; Chen, W.; Xu, S.; Eddy, L.; Han, Y.; Yakobson, B.I.; et al. Cathode-Electrolyte Interphase Engineering toward Fast-Charging LiFePO4 Cathodes by Flash Carbon Coating. Small Methods 2025, 9, e2400680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, J.Y.; Dong, S.D.; Song, M.W.; Leng, Y.; Hai, C.; Zhou, Y. Improving the Electrochemical Performance of a Solid-State Battery with a LiFePO4-Garnet-Based Composite Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 6192–6198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pan, X.X.; Zhuan, S.X.; Sun, Y.Q.; Sun, G.; Ren, Y.; Jiang, S.; Zhu, B.; Li, X.; Wen, Y. Restraining formation of Fe-Li anti-site defects via in-situ surface construction on single-crystal LiFePO4 cathode for extending fast charging lifespan. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 968, 172257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nie, S.R.; Xia, Y.H.; Xiao, Y.Z.; Lin, W.; Yang, G.; Peng, W.; Peng, S.; Meng, F.; Hu, R.; Yuan, B. Direct Liquid-Phase Regeneration of Eluting Spent LiFePO4 Upgrade for Fast-Charging Cathodes Under Low Temperature and Ambient Pressure. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 17, 21257−21268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tian, H.; Kuang, X.; Liu, P.; Chen, X. In situ synthesis of carbon nanotubes for constructing highly conductive networks in lithium iron phosphate to enhance electrochemical performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1020, 179421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, S.G.; Liu, K.; Ding, Y.Y.; Wu, L.; Chen, J.; Mao, J.; Huang, H. The electrochemical enhancement effect and synergistic modification mechanism of V-Cl co-doping on carbon coated lithium iron phosphate cathode materials. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2025, 978, 118894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, X.Y.; Bao, Y.Y.; Li, W.; Zhao, S.; Chao, H. Current research status on the structural properties and modification of LiFePO4 cathode materials. React. Chem. Eng. 2024, 9, 2830–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, B.K.; Xiao, J.Q.; Zhu, X.Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Han, Y.; Niu, J.; Wang, F. Enabling high-performance lithium iron phosphate cathodes through an interconnected carbon network for practical and high-energy lithium-ion batteries. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 653, 942−948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, J.Y.; Tan, B.Q.; Chen, D.Z.; Liu, X.; Zhou, R.; Hu, C.; Liu, C.; Zeng, G.; Luo, X. Multifunctional N, S-co-doped carbon quantum dots enable defect healing and conductive network construction in spent LiFePO4 cathodes. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 522, 167249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, X.P.; Ma, J.Y.; Gao, C.X.; Ma, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, F. In-situ polymerized high-ionic conductivity vinyl-based copolymer in electrospinning membrane for lithium-ion batteries. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 719, 137016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Balqis, F.; Eldona, C.; Laksono, B.T.; Aini, Q.; Hamid, F.H.; Wasisto, H.S.; Sumboja, A. Conductive Polymer Frameworks in Silicon Anodes for Advanced Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 4933–4952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, G.H.; Liu, F.Y.; Li, S.S.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y. Effect of binary composite conductive agent on the performance of lithium slurry battery. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 3299–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.F.; Hong, J.H.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Wang, H.; Ye, L.; Li, Y. Synergistically enhanced thermal conductivity, electrical insulation, and mechanical toughness of polymer composites with carbon nanofibers segregated by alumina nanoparticles. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 289, 111935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.Y.; Huang, Z.Y.; He, C.G.; Zhang, J.L.; Mei, P.; Han, X.Y.; Wang, X.G.; Yang, Y.K. Binary carbon-based additives in LiFePO4 cathode with favorable lithium storage. J. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2020, 1, 934–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural and morphological characterization of SP, GN, and CNTs: (a) XRD patterns; (b) Raman spectra; (c) N2 adsorption isotherms; (df) SEM images of SP, GN, and CNTs; (gi) TEM images of SP, GN (The part indicated by the dashed circle represents the multi-layer stacking situation of GN), and CNTs.
Figure 1. Structural and morphological characterization of SP, GN, and CNTs: (a) XRD patterns; (b) Raman spectra; (c) N2 adsorption isotherms; (df) SEM images of SP, GN, and CNTs; (gi) TEM images of SP, GN (The part indicated by the dashed circle represents the multi-layer stacking situation of GN), and CNTs.
Metals 16 00375 g001
Figure 2. Structural evolution of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents before and after cycling: (ad) XRD patterns of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37; (eh) SEM images of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37 after cycling (The dashed circle section shows the connection between each conductive agent and LiFePO4); (il) XPS spectra of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37 after cycling.
Figure 2. Structural evolution of LiFePO4 electrodes with different conductive agents before and after cycling: (ad) XRD patterns of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37; (eh) SEM images of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37 after cycling (The dashed circle section shows the connection between each conductive agent and LiFePO4); (il) XPS spectra of LFP-SP, LFP-GN, LFP-CNTs, and LFP-S5GC37 after cycling.
Metals 16 00375 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents: (a) differential capacity curves; (b) initial charge/discharge curves; (c) rate performance; (d) discharge curves at 1C; (e) cycling performance at 1C; (f) cycling performance at 3C.
Figure 3. Electrochemical performance of LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents: (a) differential capacity curves; (b) initial charge/discharge curves; (c) rate performance; (d) discharge curves at 1C; (e) cycling performance at 1C; (f) cycling performance at 3C.
Metals 16 00375 g003
Figure 4. Electrochemical impedance characteristics of LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents at various charge/discharge voltages: (a,d) Nyquist plots of LFP-GN and LFP-S5GC37; (b,e) DRT spectra of LFP-GN and LFP-S5GC37 at different discharge voltages (The part pointed by the arrow represents the local enlargement view of each peak); (c,f) evolution of charge transfer resistance Rct under charging and discharging states.
Figure 4. Electrochemical impedance characteristics of LiFePO4 cells with different conductive agents at various charge/discharge voltages: (a,d) Nyquist plots of LFP-GN and LFP-S5GC37; (b,e) DRT spectra of LFP-GN and LFP-S5GC37 at different discharge voltages (The part pointed by the arrow represents the local enlargement view of each peak); (c,f) evolution of charge transfer resistance Rct under charging and discharging states.
Metals 16 00375 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeng, F.; Dai, G.; Hu, Q.; Yan, T.; Duan, J.; Zhong, S. Multidimensional Ternary Conductive Network for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes. Metals 2026, 16, 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16040375

AMA Style

Zeng F, Dai G, Hu Q, Yan T, Duan J, Zhong S. Multidimensional Ternary Conductive Network for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes. Metals. 2026; 16(4):375. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16040375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeng, Fantao, Guodong Dai, Qichuang Hu, Tingting Yan, Jianfeng Duan, and Shengwen Zhong. 2026. "Multidimensional Ternary Conductive Network for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes" Metals 16, no. 4: 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16040375

APA Style

Zeng, F., Dai, G., Hu, Q., Yan, T., Duan, J., & Zhong, S. (2026). Multidimensional Ternary Conductive Network for Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4 Cathodes. Metals, 16(4), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16040375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop