Utilization of Secondary Copper Smelting Slags for Proppant Production
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Crushing Resistance Test Results of the Obtained Proppants
3.2. Evaluation of the Acid Resistance of Proppants
3.3. Results of Bulk and Absolute (True) Density Measurements
3.4. Results of Sphericity and Roundness Evaluation of Proppants
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The feasibility of producing magnesia–quartz proppants from secondary copper smelting slag generated after the pyrometallurgical extraction of iron and zinc has been demonstrated. The slag, mainly composed of SiO2–CaO–Al2O3–MgO oxides, can be effectively utilized as a technogenic raw material for the production of spherical proppant granules by centrifugal granulation.
- Proppants obtained directly after granulation exhibit an amorphous glassy structure and insufficient mechanical strength, with up to 70% of granules destroyed at a pressure of 34.5 MPa. Controlled heat treatment promotes crystallization of silicate and material.
- Optimal heat-treatment conditions were determined to be holding at 800 °C for 60 min, resulting in a reduction in the crushed fraction to 10% at 34.5 MPa, which satisfies the requirements of GOST R 54571-2011 for magnesia–quartz proppants.
- Increasing the MgO content from 5 to 16 wt.% leads to significant microstructural refinement, reducing the average grain size from approximately 1 μm to 0.2 μm and improving crushing resistance to 3% destroyed granules at 34.5 MPa.
- The application of a phenol–formaldehyde protective coating significantly enhances the chemical durability of the proppants, reducing their solubility in a hydrochloric–hydrofluoric acid mixture from 19% to 2%, thereby ensuring compliance with the requirements for acid resistance.
- The proposed approach enables the integrated utilization of secondary copper smelting slags and demonstrates the potential for producing industrially competitive proppants while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact of metallurgical waste aluminosilicate phases, which significantly improves the mechanical performance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kundu, T.; Das, S.K.; Angadi, S.I.; Rath, S.S. A comprehensive review on the recovery of copper values from copper slag. Powder Technol. 2023, 426, 118693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Xie, H.; Han, B. The utilization of the copper smelting slag: A critical review. Minerals 2025, 15, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabasiane, T.S.; Danha, G.; Mamvura, T.A.; Mashifana, T.; Dzinomwa, G. Environmental and socioeconomic impact of copper slag—A review. Crystals 2021, 11, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adilov, G.; Suleimen, B.; Kosdauletov, N. Challenges and opportunities in the recycling of copper slags. J. Sustain. Metall. 2025, 11, 2064–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phiri, T.C.; Singh, P.; Nikoloski, A.N. The potential for copper slag waste as a resource for a circular economy: A review—Part I. Miner. Eng. 2022, 180, 107474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansourkiyaei, S.; Golzary, A. Innovative approaches to circular economy in copper slag management: Maximizing resource efficiency and sustainability. Results Eng. 2025, 17, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adilov, G.; Kareva, N.T.; Roshchin, V.E. Influence of copper and silicon on phase transformations in the iron–carbon system. Izv. Ferr. Metall. 2024, 67, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morsy, A.; Rahman, H.H.A.; Kamel, H.M.; Ewais, H.A.; Ahmed, A.E.M.M.; Morsy, A.; Fadl, E.A.; Blall, E.G. Sustainable recovery of copper from wastewater via zinc cementation enhanced by natural chalcone-based accelerators. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 31304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuang, B.; Yu, Y.; Hu, J.; Dou, Z.; Wang, H.; Yang, S.; Liu, H. Recovery of heavy metals from copper slag by slow cooling: Mechanism of matte growth and transformation behaviors of heavy metals. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 361, 131327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Xu, Y.; Tian, L.; Chen, Y.; Yang, A.; Gan, G.; Ma, Y.; Du, Y. Two-stage method recovery of metals from copper slag: Realizing the resource utilization of all components. Miner. Eng. 2024, 206, 108490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Xie, Z.; Jiang, T.; Shen, P.; Liu, D. Experimental and mechanistic study on the recovery of copper, iron, zinc and cobalt from copper slag by low-temperature roasting with sulfuric acid–ammonium persulfate combined with water leaching. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 521, 166710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toniolo, N.; Romero, A.R.; Marangoni, M.; Binhussain, M.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Bernardo, E. Glass-ceramic proppants from sinter-crystallisation of waste-derived glasses. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2018, 117, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biryukova, A.A.; Dzhienalyev, T.D.; Panichkin, A.V. Ceramic proppants for hydraulic fracturing. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1040, 012008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, M.R.; Li, W.; Alharbi, B.; Alsharaeh, E. Recent developments on in situ generated proppants for hydraulic fracturing operations: A critical review. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 242, 213265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramazanov, V.; Matovu, S.; Al Shafloot, T.; Alarifi, S.A. Enhancing fracturing proppant performance: Methods and assessment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2025, 50, 4477–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhsan, A.S.; Al-Jothery, H.K.M.; Hamdi, S.S.; Alakbari, F.S. Recent progress in proppant technology for improving the fracture conductivity in hydraulic fracturing. J. Adv. Res. Des. 2025, 127, 96–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Deng, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhuang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, X.; Lian, H.; Han, M.; Tian, Y. High-temperature- and salt-resistant self-suspending proppant for hydraulic fracturing. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 8620–8630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Zhou, T.; Zhao, M.; Wang, H.; Hu, X.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Z. Thermal-shock-induced surface softening and conductivity evolution of hydraulic fracture in enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 2022, 102, 102405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GOST R 54571–2011; Magnesia–Quartz Proppants. Specifications. Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology: Moscow, Russia, 2011.
- Zhang, W.M.; Li, Z.T.; Li, Q.S.; Chen, W.J.; Meng, C.Y.; Cui, Y.L. Study on high-strength and low-density resin-coated ceramic proppants. Oilfield Chem. 2013, 30, 189–192. [Google Scholar]
- Pangilinan, K.D.; Al Christopher, C.; Advincula, R.C. Polymers for proppants used in hydraulic fracturing. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2016, 145, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Component | O | Mg | Al | Si | S | Ca | Fe |
| Content, wt.% | 50 | 3.1 | 8.0 | 24.7 | 0.1 | 13.4 | 0.8 |
| Indicator | Requirement |
|---|---|
| MgO content, wt.% | 8 |
| SiO2 content, wt.% | 50 |
| Mass fraction of the main size fraction, %. | 90.0 |
| Sphericity, dimensionless | 0.7 |
| Roundness, dimensionless | 0.7 |
| Solubility in acid mixture, % mass loss | 10.0 |
| Solubility in HCl, % mass loss | 1.0 |
| Bulk density, g/cm3 | 1.75 |
| Apparent density, g/cm3 | 3.10 |
| True density, g/cm3 | 3.10 |
| Loss on ignition, % | 4.0 |
| Applied Pressure, MPa | Fraction 0.6–1.0 mm, % Crushed | Fraction 1.0–1.6 mm, % Crushed |
|---|---|---|
| 34.5 | 10 | 15 |
| 51.7 | 15 | 20 |
| 68.9 | 20 | 25 |
| Pressure, MPa | Fraction Size, mm | Allowable Fraction of Crushed Granules According to GOST, % | Fraction of Crushed Granules After Heat Treatment, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34.5 | 0.63–1.0 | 10 | 3 |
| 1.0–1.6 | 15 | 4 | |
| 51.7 | 0.63–1.0 | 15 | 9 |
| 1.0–1.6 | 20 | 11 | |
| 68.9 | 0.63–1.0 | 20 | 10 |
| 1.0–1.6 | 25 | 19 | |
| 86.1 | 0.63–1.0 | - | 20 |
| No. | Mass of Proppants Before Coating, g | Amount of Added Bakelite, mL | Number of Protective Coating Layers | Mass of Proppants After Coating, g | Solubility (Mass Loss, %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 19 |
| 2 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 9 |
| 3 | 50 | 2 | 2 | 52 | 4 |
| 4 | 50 | 3 | 3 | 53 | 2 |
| 5 | 50 | 2 | 1 | 52 | 8 |
| 6 | 50 | 3 | 1 | 53 | 7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Adilov, G.; Uakhitova, B.; Abdirashit, A.; Bazarbay, A. Utilization of Secondary Copper Smelting Slags for Proppant Production. Metals 2026, 16, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16030328
Adilov G, Uakhitova B, Abdirashit A, Bazarbay A. Utilization of Secondary Copper Smelting Slags for Proppant Production. Metals. 2026; 16(3):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16030328
Chicago/Turabian StyleAdilov, Galymzhan, Bagdagul Uakhitova, Assylbek Abdirashit, and Aldiyar Bazarbay. 2026. "Utilization of Secondary Copper Smelting Slags for Proppant Production" Metals 16, no. 3: 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16030328
APA StyleAdilov, G., Uakhitova, B., Abdirashit, A., & Bazarbay, A. (2026). Utilization of Secondary Copper Smelting Slags for Proppant Production. Metals, 16(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/met16030328

