3.1. Effects of Process Conditions on Weld Bead Formation
Laser galvanometer scanning was found to have a significant influence on the geometry and surface quality of the resulting weld seams.
Figure 2 illustrates a comparative analysis of the weld surface morphology and metallographic cross-sections obtained under circular and sinusoidal scanning trajectories using CNC scanning and galvanometer-based scanning methods.
Figure 2a illustrates various surface defects observed in welds produced under sinusoidal and circular scanning trajectories using CNC and galvanometer-based scanning methods. The weld surface produced by CNC scanning was characterized by pronounced spatter and porosity, whereas the surface obtained through galvanometer-based scanning was comparatively smoother and exhibited fewer surface defects. The cross-sectional images indicate that the weld joint between the substrates was broader in the galvanometer-based scanning mode than in the CNC scanning mode. Additionally, a uniform U-shaped profile was formed at the bottom of the molten pool. In particular, the cross-section of sample S
25, which was welded at a relatively high speed with low heat input, exhibited unstable porosity, resulting in asymmetric weld penetration on both sides of the seam.
Figure 2b presents a comparison of weld seams formed using circular-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning and CNC scanning methods. The weld seam formed under circular-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning was characterized by a smooth surface with minimal spatter. The metallographic cross-sections revealed the presence of W-shaped and U-shaped weld profiles. It should be noted that the molten pool formed during circular-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning was relatively shallow and did not fully penetrate to the bottom of the lower substrate, reaching only the upper surface. This incomplete penetration may adversely affect the mechanical properties of the weld.
Different scanning trajectories were found to significantly influence the macroscopic characteristics of the weld seam. A comparison between the sinusoidal and circular trajectories revealed distinct heat-affected zones (HAZs) on either side of the weld seam. As welding progressed, the HAZ was observed to expand along the welding direction. Specifically, a wider HAZ was obtained when the circular trajectory was employed, whereas a narrower HAZ was observed with the sinusoidal trajectory. This difference was attributed to the higher path overlap associated with circular trajectories, resulting in increased heat input and enhanced heat accumulation.
Under galvanometer-based scanning conditions, whether circular or sinusoidal trajectories were employed, the weld surface was observed to maintain a relatively uniform profile with significantly reduced defects. Surface defects such as spatter and porosity were effectively minimized. Galvanometer-based scanning was also found to improve welding quality by suppressing the formation of pronounced heat-affected zones, which are commonly observed in CNC scanning. In contrast to CNC scanning, in which large spatter particles and pores frequently appeared on the weld surface, the galvanometer-based scanning process produced a flatter weld surface with minimal spatter, leading to a more stable welding process.
The circular laser beam scanned by the galvanometer was found to enhance the molten area on the material surface, thereby providing both preheating and post-heating effects. It should be noted that, under the present hybrid laser parameters (combined power of approximately 900 W), the welding process was likely dominated by a heat conduction regime rather than a stable keyhole mode, as previous studies on thin-sheet welding have indicated that power levels around 900 W typically correspond to heat conduction laser welding (HCLW) [
22]. Within this regime, galvanometer-driven beam oscillation was found to effectively reduce the lateral temperature gradient across the molten pool and promote a more uniform thermal distribution. This stabilization of the molten pool dynamics was found to suppress turbulent flow and vapor recoil, which are recognized as key mechanisms responsible for defect formation, such as spatter. Consequently, the overall weld quality was improved.
In conclusion, sinusoidal-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning was demonstrated to offer distinct advantages in improving welding quality, reducing defects, and ensuring weld consistency, particularly for highly reflective and thermally conductive materials. The use of galvanometer-based scanning technology was shown to be essential for achieving high-quality welds with minimal surface imperfections and optimized mechanical properties.
To evaluate the stability of penetration along the welding direction, additional longitudinal microsections were prepared and examined (see the newly added images in
Figure 3). The longitudinal views confirmed that the fusion profile remained continuous along the weld length, while the penetration depth exhibited only minor fluctuations. This evidence supports the conclusion that the penetration under the present conditions was sufficiently consistent, rather than being dominated by intermittent or unstable penetration behavior.
3.2. The Influence of Process Conditions on the Microstructure of Joints
No obvious welding defects were observed in the cross-sections of any specimens.
Figure 4 and
Figure 5 present the quantitative characteristics of weld seam geometry under different scanning methods, including melt width (D), melt depth (H), depth-to-width ratio (H/D), and molten pool area (evaluated based on a melt depth of 0.75 mm, a melt width of 2 mm, and a depth-to-width ratio of 0.375). Under circular-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning, the molten pool width was found to reach a maximum value of 2.39 mm, while the width fluctuation induced by oscillation at different welding speeds remained relatively small. In contrast, the molten pool width exhibited more pronounced variations under CNC scanning. For example, in the C
15 mode, the molten pool width was measured to be 0.98 mm, with fluctuations of up to 0.29 mm under comparable conditions. This difference highlights the limitations of CNC laser scanning in terms of control precision, whereas galvanometer-based scanning was found to effectively minimize deviations between the programmed and actual trajectories, thereby enabling more precise heat input control.
Figure 4a presents a comparison of the molten pool sizes obtained using a sinusoidal welding trajectory under CNC scanning (S
15, S
20, S
25) and galvanometer-based scanning (S
G15, S
G20, S
G25). During CNC scanning, as the welding speed increased from 15 mm/s to 25 mm/s, the penetration depth remained approximately ~0.70 mm, while the weld bead width de-creased slightly from 1.70 mm to 1.60 mm. In contrast, galvanometer-based scanning was found to maintain a stable molten pool width of approximately 2.20 mm with minimal fluctuation. This stability was attributed to the high precision and uniform energy input of galvanometer-based scanning, which reduced molten pool oscillation and suppressed surface spatter and pore formation. To further clarify the effect of galvanometer control on molten pool stability,
Figure 4b illustrates the variations in molten pool area under different scanning strategies. Both scanning modes exhibited a similar trend, in which the molten pool area increased from a minimum at 15 mm/s to a peak at 20 mm/s and then decreased at 25 mm/s. However, across all welding speeds, galvanometer-based scanning produced a significantly larger molten pool area. This advantage was attributed to precise energy modulation, which ensured uniform energy distribution, reduced vapor recoil pressure, and enhanced laser–material energy coupling. In contrast, CNC scanning, owing to its lower modulation frequency and positioning accuracy, was more prone to heat loss and spatter formation, thereby limiting molten pool growth. Notably, under galvanometer-based scanning, the depth-to-width ratio remained constant at approximately 0.35, meeting the evaluation criteria, whereas under CNC scanning it reached approximately 0.40 and was influenced primarily by welding speed.
Figure 5a presents a comparison of the molten pool sizes for circular-trajectory welding under CNC scanning (C
15, C
20, C
25) and galvanometer-based scanning (C
G15, C
G20, C
G25). Under CNC scanning, penetration depth fluctuated significantly, with a difference of 0.29 mm between C
15 and C
20/C
25. In contrast, galvanometer-based scanning maintained a stable melt depth (0.6 mm) and width (2.3 mm), indicating that galvo control significantly broadened the molten pool and produced a more uniform energy distribution. However, the melt depth of 0.6 mm did not meet the 0.75 mm standard requirement.
Figure 5b further illustrates the depth-to-width ratio and molten pool area under circular-trajectory galvanometer-based scanning, confirming that the molten pool dimensions were more stable compared to CNC scanning.
Additionally, the depth-to-width ratio (0.35) of the sinusoidal trajectory under galvanometer-based scanning was generally higher than that of the circular trajectory under galvanometer-based scanning (0.26). From an energy absorption perspective, the laser swing welding path length is relatively long, and the linear velocity of circular scanning is higher than that of the sinusoidal trajectory. According to the linear energy formula [
21], at constant power, a higher linear velocity reduces the energy per unit length along the laser path, thereby decreasing energy absorption by the material and resulting in a shallower penetration depth. By contrast, the sinusoidal trajectory in galvanometer-based scanning provides higher energy density per unit time, which promotes deeper penetration. Additionally, the depth-to-width ratio (0.35) of the sinusoidal trajectory under galvo-scanning was generally higher than that of the circular trajectory under galvo-scanning (0.26). From an energy absorption perspective, the laser swing welding path length is relatively long, and the linear velocity of circular scanning is greater than that of the sinusoidal trajectory. According to the linear energy formula [
23], at constant power, a higher linear velocity reduces the energy per unit length along the laser path, decreasing energy absorption by the material and resulting in shallower penetration depth. By contrast, the sinusoidal trajectory in galvo-scanning provides higher energy density per unit time, which favors deeper penetration.
In summary, galvanometer-based scanning was demonstrated to exhibit superior weld formation capability in sinusoidal-trajectory welding, particularly under SG20 conditions, where a desirable weld appearance and a balanced penetration depth and width were achieved, thereby providing a solid foundation for optimizing mechanical properties. Overall, the scanning strategy was found to strongly influence weld morphology: CNC scanning produced deeper but narrower weld seams that were more sensitive to welding speed variations, whereas galvanometer-based scanning provided greater geometric consistency and wider weld beads. The introduction of a galvanometer control system was shown to significantly improve the precision of heat input regulation in thin-plate laser welding applications.
3.3. Components Microstructure Evolution
In laser welding, the solidification conditions of the molten pool, primarily governed by the cooling rate and temperature gradient, directly dictate the resulting grain morphology and microstructure evolution [
24,
25]. To clearly illustrate the influence of galvo-scanning laser on the microstructure of the welded area, quantitative analyses were performed on columnar and equiaxed crystals.
Figure 6 presents two regions of the weld seam—columnar crystal region A and equiaxed crystal region B—on which quantitative analysis was performed.
Using Equation (1),
Figure 7 presents the number of dendrites under different modes.
Figure 8 compares dendrite spacing (Z
l) between galvo-scanning and CNC scanning.
Zs was calculated using Equation (2), and
Figure 9 and
Figure 10 were used to determine the number and average size of equiaxed crystals.
Figure 7 and
Figure 8 presents a systematic comparison of the primary dendrite spacing (Z
l) of columnar grains under different welding modes. Quantitative analysis revealed that galvanometer-based scanning significantly refined columnar dendrites at the same welding speed. Notably, under the sinusoidal trajectory at 20 mm/s, galvanometer-based scanning (S
G20) was found to achieve the smallest Z
l value of 11.76 μm among all specimens, highlighting the exceptional grain refinement capability of this parameter set. Under the circular trajectory at 15 mm/s, the Z
l value in galvanometer-based mode (C
G15) was measured to be 18.18 μm, which was 36.36% lower than that obtained in CNC mode (C
15: 28.57 μm). Under the sinusoidal trajectory at the same welding speed, the Z
l value in galvanometer-based mode (S
G15) was reduced to 13.33 μm, representing a 46.68% reduction compared to the CNC mode (S
15: 25 μm). As the welding speed increased, the inhibitory effect of galvanometer-based scanning on columnar dendrite growth became more pronounced. For instance, at 25 mm/s, the Z
l value of C
G25 (20.00 μm) was 40% lower than that of C
25 (33.33 μm). These results provide strong evidence that galvanometer-based scanning effectively promotes columnar grain refinement through high-frequency oscillation, with the S
G20 parameter set achieving the smallest dendrite spacing, consistent with its superior microstructural characteristics and tensile properties.
Figure 9 and
Figure 10 presents a systematic comparison of the variation in the average equiaxed grain size (Z
s) under different welding modes, revealing that the coupled effect of scanning path and welding speed predominantly governed grain refinement, whereas the scanning control method played only a secondary optimizing role. The equiaxed grain size in all specimens was observed to decrease significantly with increasing welding speed. At a low welding speed (15 mm/s), the circular trajectory exhibited the highest path overlap ratio, and the equiaxed grain size in galvanometer-based mode (C
G15: 36.51 µm) was approximately 9% smaller than that obtained in CNC mode (C
15: 40 µm). As the welding speed increased to 25 mm/s, the difference between the two modes became negligible, confirming that the combined effect of welding speed and overlap ratio was the determining factor. Under the sinusoidal trajectory, the Z
s values obtained using different control strategies nearly overlapped, further indicating that the control method itself was not the primary factor governing equiaxed grain refinement. Galvanometer-based scanning was found to promote nucleation through high-frequency molten pool stirring only under low welding speed and high overlap conditions, thereby providing additional equiaxed grain refinement, whereas its influence was limited under other parameter ranges. This figure quantitatively elucidates the dominant influence of the “path–speed–overlap ratio” on equiaxed grain size and defines the effective scope of galvanometer-based control optimization.
Based on the analysis of grain size, a quantitative relationship between the primary dendrite spacing and the linear energy under a sinusoidal trajectory was established to clarify the regulatory mechanism of the scanning mode on dendrite structure. In the sinusoidal trajectory scanning mode, the relationship between linear energy (E) and primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) for CNC scanning and galvanometer-based scanning was independently fitted using linear regression. The fitting results are presented in
Figure 11. The fitting model corresponding to CNC scanning is given in Equation (3). Its relatively high slope (0.503) indicates that the primary dendrite spacing increased significantly with increasing linear energy, reflecting insufficient heat input control accuracy in this mode, whereby energy fluctuations readily caused pronounced variations in dendrite size. In contrast, the fitting model for galvanometer-based scanning, given in Equation (4), exhibited an extremely small slope (0.072), indicating that the primary dendrite spacing was highly insensitive to variations in linear energy. This further confirmed that galvanometer-based scanning exhibited excellent consistency and controllability with respect to energy input.
It should be noted that this formula is applicable to lap welding of 0.5 mm-thick T2 copper within a linear energy range of 30–60 J/mm. Notably, higher prediction accuracy was achieved at lower linear energy levels. This quantitative relationship provides a theoretical basis for optimizing weld microstructure through energy regulation.
The quantitative analysis above demonstrated that galvanometer-based scanning simultaneously refined both columnar dendrites and equiaxed grains in the weld zone at identical welding speeds. It is particularly noteworthy that under sinusoidal galvanometer-based scanning at 20 mm/s (S
G20), the smallest primary dendrite spacing (11.76 μm) for columnar grains was achieved while maintaining a moderate equiaxed grain size, representing an optimal grain refinement condition. This remarkable microstructural optimization was closely associated with the unique molten pool dynamics and solidification conditions induced by galvanometer-based scanning. To further elucidate the underlying mechanisms, the following section, together with
Figure 12, examines how the scanning mode regulates the cooling rate (R) and temperature gradient (G) during solidification.
Figure 12a illustrates a schematic representation of the microstructure formed under the fiber-diode hybrid laser beam mode. From the fusion line to the weld center, the dendritic morphology was predominantly columnar and equiaxed [
26], which was attributed to an increased cooling rate and a decreased temperature gradient during welding.
Figure 12b demonstrates that the microstructure of the weld seam was closely governed by the combined effects of cooling rate (R) and temperature gradient (G), resulting in distinct crystal morphologies in different regions of the weld seam [
27,
28,
29]. This phenomenon was attributed to the intense stirring effect induced by galvanometer-based scanning on the molten pool through high-frequency oscillation. The periodic movement of the laser beam along a preset trajectory (sinusoidal or circular) was found to enhance Marangoni convection within the molten pool. Consequently, the temperature gradient (G) at the solid–liquid interface was reduced, while the degree of solidification undercooling was increased, thereby inhibiting the growth of columnar crystals.
It is noteworthy that the effect of scanning trajectory on dendrite refinement varied [
30,
31,
32], with the sinusoidal trajectory under galvanometer-based scanning exhibiting a slightly superior refinement effect compared to the circular trajectory; the minimum Z
l value of the S
G20 sample was measured to be 11.76 μm. This suggests that the gentler heat input distribution and lower path overlap rate associated with the sinusoidal trajectory had a significant influence on dendrite refinement. These findings provide crucial experimental evidence for optimizing welding processes in high-thermal-conductivity materials and for enhancing joint mechanical properties through microstructural regulation.
This occurred because, under the CNC scanning strategy, the heat source lacked sufficient scanning accuracy to achieve precise and uniform energy transfer to the metal. This imprecision led to an uneven heat distribution, which in turn induced more intense thermal convection. Under such intense convection, columnar structures were subjected to severe thermal shock. Columnar crystals were remelted because of rapid local heat accumulation and subsequently recrystallized, during which their original growth direction and morphology were significantly altered. Meanwhile, the growth environment of equiaxed crystals was severely disrupted. Due to excessively intense thermal convection, it became difficult for equiaxed crystals to establish stable temperature and solute concentration fields during the early stages of formation. The necessary material supply and thermal balance required for their growth were disrupted, ultimately inhibiting equiaxed crystal growth and hindering normal development. This, in turn, had a profound and complex impact on the overall microstructure and properties of the material.
Figure 13 schematically illustrates the grain refinement mechanisms under galvanometer-based scanning and CNC scanning. (a) Under galvanometer-based scanning with precise trajectory control and a wider weld bead (
Figure 4a), the heat input was more uniformly distributed, resulting in a lower temperature gradient (G) at the solid–liquid interface. This condition suppressed the directional growth of columnar crystals and promoted the columnar-to-equiaxed transition. Concurrently, enhanced molten pool convection induced by high-frequency oscillation improved heat extraction, potentially increasing the local cooling rate (R) and thereby refining the dendrite arm spacing (reducing Z
1). (b) In contrast, the inertia-limited dynamic response of the CNC scanning system resulted in more concentrated and less uniform heat deposition. This created a steeper spatial temperature gradient (G) at the solidification front. Furthermore, the comparatively weaker molten pool stirring under this mode was likely to restrict heat extraction efficiency, resulting in a lower effective cooling rate (R) than that theoretically achievable with a perfectly controlled point heat source. Consequently, the resulting high G/R ratio provided a dominant driving force for the sustained growth of coarse columnar dendrites, leading to the larger primary dendrite arm spacing (Z
1) quantitatively documented in
Figure 8.
3.4. The Hardness Distribution and Tensile Properties of the Joint
The weld width was measured to be 2 mm. A total of 15 hardness test points were spaced 200 μm apart, extending from the center of the molten pool to both the left and right, to evaluate the Vickers hardness distribution [
33]. The average Vickers hardness of the base material was 83.46 HV.
Figure 14 presents the microhardness variation curves of the joints under different process conditions.
There were significant differences in mechanical performance between equiaxed and columnar grains [
34]. Due to their isotropic nature, equiaxed grains exhibited more balanced mechanical properties in terms of strength and toughness. In contrast, columnar grains, owing to their directional growth, exhibited pronounced anisotropy. The hardness profile for the sinusoidal trajectory exhibited relatively stable hardness values with a small fluctuation amplitude. Conversely, the hardness profile for the circular trajectory exhibited larger fluctuations, particularly at a welding speed of 15 mm/s, where hardness variations became more pronounced. Grain size analysis in
Figure 8 and
Figure 10 revealed pronounced growth of columnar grains, resulting in directional hardness variations and a relatively low fraction of equiaxed grains. Notably, under the sinusoidal trajectory at 20 mm/s, the hardness profile exhibited the smallest fluctuation amplitude, with an average hardness of 85.87 HV. This suggested that hardness variations at different positions within the molten pool were minimal, indicating a relatively uniform microstructure, which was consistent with the smallest dendritic spacing (11.76 μm) of the columnar grains shown in
Figure 8.
The comprehensive hardness curve analysis further highlighted the uniformity of the microstructure. Compared with circular trajectories, sinusoidal trajectories were found to more effectively optimize grain morphology, particularly by promoting the formation and distribution of equiaxed grains. Among the various sinusoidal trajectory conditions, the 20 mm/s sinusoidal galvanometer-based scanning condition was found to yield the most uniform hardness distribution and the most effective grain morphology optimization.
As per the sampling method shown in
Figure 1d, one lap-shear specimen was extracted from each welded joint produced under different processing parameters for mechanical testing. Due to the circular galvanometer-based scanning condition exhibiting a penetration depth of only 0.6 mm, which did not meet the required criterion for penetration depth assessment, the lap-shear performance comparison was limited to CNC scanning and galvanometer-based scanning under the sinusoidal trajectory. The corresponding test results, shown in
Figure 14, illustrate the lap-shear strength of the joints under the sinusoidal scanning mode.
The lap-shear strength of the joints, as evaluated by tensile testing of lap-shear specimens, was summarized in
Figure 15. For joints fabricated using sinusoidal-trajectory CNC scanning, the lap-shear strength was measured to be 264, 265, and 271 N/mm
2 at welding speeds of 15, 20, and 25 mm/s (S
15, S
20, and S
25), respectively. In comparison, the joints produced by sinusoidal galvanometer-based scanning exhibited lap-shear strengths of 265, 277, and 274 N/mm
2 at the corresponding welding speeds (S
G15, S
G20, and S
G25).
Analysis of the lap-shear strength data yielded two salient findings. First, the galvanometer-based scanned joints were found to generally attain higher strength values, with the S
G20 parameter set achieving a maximum lap-shear strength of 277 N/mm
2. This optimal mechanical performance was concomitant with the most refined dendritic structure (i.e., the smallest primary dendrite arm spacing, Z
1) identified under identical welding conditions in
Section 3.3, indicating a direct contribution of microstructural refinement to the load-bearing capacity of the joint. Second, while the strength of CNC-scanned joints increased monotonically with welding speed, the galvanometer-based scanned joints maintained high strength levels (exceeding 274 N/mm
2) across the intermediate-to-high welding speed range (20–25 mm/s). This pattern suggests that galvanometer-based scanning provides a more robust process window, within which consistent mechanical performance is less sensitive to variations in welding speed.
Fracture of all specimens was observed to occur near the weld fusion line, indicating that the interfacial microstructure—dominated by the columnar grain zone—constituted the critical region governing failure. This finding further underscores the importance of controlling solidification structure, as achieved through galvanometer-based scanning, to ensure optimal joint performance.