Next Article in Journal
Does Obesity Affect Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Adaptations after a 3-Month Combined Exercise Program in Untrained Premenopausal Middle-Aged Women?
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Mat Pilates Training on Blood Pressure, Inflammatory, and Oxidative Profiles in Hypertensive Elderly
Previous Article in Journal
The Changing Landscape in Upper Limb Sports Rehabilitation and Injury Prevention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rate of Responders for Post-Exercise Hypotension after Beach Tennis, Aerobic, Resistance and Combined Exercise Sessions in Adults with Hypertension
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Energy Availability (LEA) and Hypertension in Black Division I Collegiate Athletes: A Novel Pilot Study

1
Department of Kinesiology, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA
2
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA
3
Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sports 2023, 11(4), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11040081
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 31 March 2023 / Published: 7 April 2023

Abstract

:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between low energy availability (LEA) and nutritional content with high blood pressure (HBP) in African American Division I athletes. Twenty-three D1 African American pre-season athletes were recruited to participate. HBP was defined as >120 systolic blood pressure (BP) and <80 diastolic BP. Athletes self-reported nutritional intake using a non-consecutive 3-day food recall which was then reviewed by a sports dietitian. LEA was evaluated as total energy intake—total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), which was predicted. Additionally, micronutrients were evaluated. A statistical analysis relied on Spearman correlation (R), standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval, mean ± SD, and odds ratios (OR). Correlation values were categorized: 0.20–0.39 = low; 0.40–0.69 = moderate; 0.70–1.0 = strong. A moderate relationship was observed between HBP and LEA (R = 0.56) with 14/23 having HBP. Of the 14 athletes observed with HBP, 78.5% (11/14) were calorically deficient (−529 ± 695 kcal) with an OR of 7.2. Micronutrient intake deficiencies were ubiquitous among the 23 HBP athletes: poly-unsaturated fatty acid −29.6%; omega-3 −26.0%; iron −46.0%; calcium −25.1%; and sodium −14.2%, amongst others. LEA and micronutrient deficiencies may contribute to HBP in Black D1 athletes, which has been shown to be the most common modifiable risk factor to decrease the risk of sudden cardiac death.

1. Introduction

Division I collegiate athletes would seem to be a healthy population: they exercise well above general health recommendations, maintain agreeable body composition status, and are below the age of morbidity onset thresholds [1]. Current health recommendations along with literature indicate that calorie restriction is effective in mitigating cardiovascular dysfunction compared with medication and/or lifestyle interventions [2]. Moreover, hypertension within the physically active is 50% lower than the general population [3], with sedentarism identified as a root cause of chronic disease [4]. However, collegiate athletes and athletes in general are known to suffer from low energy availability (LEA) [5,6,7] prompting the International Olympic Committee on Sports Nutrition (IOC) to publish a consensus statement on relative energy deficiency syndrome, or RED-S. The IOC [8] described a dose-dependent relationship with LEA and metabolic/hormonal dysfunction [9], perpetuating a stress response that can result in hypertension when LEA becomes a chronic condition [3,10,11,12,13]. Currently, there are only two primary research articles using dated methods that evaluate high blood pressure (HBP) in athletes, with one being a longitudinal study across the competitive season [11,13].
The interplay between diet, physical training stress, and disease is apparent with RED-S when considering system-wide physiological dysfunction [5,6,13]. Despite the potential for morbidity, adaptations to the physical stress incurred with high level training typically induce many positive cardiovascular adaptations that include the following: cardiac chamber dimension, myocardial thickness, vascular adaptations, and microvascular angiogenesis, all of which improve cardiovascular function [14,15]. This presents a paradox where some athletes suffer from HBP which is currently reported at a rate of 3% across all athletes with a higher incidence in certain sports, e.g., American football and water sports [3,12]. Furthermore, HBP onset during pre-season has an 85% chance of advancing into hypertension (Stage I) if left untreated [3]. Revised cardiovascular guidelines published in 2018 by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology indicate that for every 20 mmHg and 10 mmHg elevation in BP (systolic/diastolic, respectively), risk factors for stroke, heart disease, and other vascular diseases double [16,17]. Even more concerning is that hypertension is the most commonly observed cardiovascular disease within athletic populations [11,18,19]. Forensic studies have shown that 80% of sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs) in athletes occurred as a result of cardiomyopathy, which is directly related to hypertension [19].
A negative calorie balance is shown to reduce hypertension in the general population which can result in the reduction in cardiovascular disease rates [1,20]. However, student athletes are at a heightened cardiovascular disease risk due to the lack of understanding of what conditions (LEA, sleep deprivation, etc.) perpetuate HBP and SCD in what is perceived to be a healthy population. For example, African American Division I basketball athletes have a significantly elevated cardiovascular risk 10× that of the overall athlete population (1:5200 vs. 1:53,703) [21]. The available evidence indicates that LEA in student athletes is associated with general health deterioration, e.g., bone health, metabolic dysfunction, cardiovascular impairment, etc. [22]. It is known that LEA is the result of a daily calorie deficiency (consumed vs. utilized), also known as a negative energy balance, and that system-wide dysfunction occurs that includes cardiovascular disease if chronic [5,12,23]. Energy deficiencies among collegiate athletes are well-documented, with one study showing an average calorie deficiency of −595 ± 283 kcals/day (95% CI: −878, −312 kcals/day) [24]. Despite the resources to compete at elite levels, student athletes are consistently deprived of sufficient calories while competing, which results in adverse effects beyond performance [5,7,22,25] that include illness, hormonal fluctuations, and increased resting heart rate amongst others [22,24,25]. In addition, the NIH in 2008 was compelled to write protocols to screen for heart disease to safeguard athletes from cardiovascular disease risk [26]. Despite relevant concerns, the current literature separately provides evidence of the consequences of HBP in athletes and LEA as a concern in the same population. Notwithstanding the significant body of evidence that separately evaluates the two issues in competitive athletes (LEA and HBP), presently, only two primary articles exist that document hypertension in athletes [11,13] and neither consider nutritional deficiencies despite the 2018 IOC on Sport Nutrition warning of the perceived risks [5,6]. Therefore, the primary aim for this study was to investigate the relationship between LEA and HBP in Division I collegiate athletes. Additionally, we hypothesized an association with nutritional content when HBP was observed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants were recruited by word of mouth amongst a Division I Historically Black College or University (HBCU) population of >300 athletes who were cleared to play after an annual pre-participation health screen/physical. Thirteen males and ten female healthy Black Division I collegiate athletes (n = 23) (age: 19.7 ± 1.5 yrs; height: 178.5 ± 12.5 cm; mass: 77.9 ± 19.1 kg; fat free mass: 62.2 ± 12.5 kg; fat mass: 15.7 ± 10.2 kg; body fat percent: 19.2 + 8.2%; VO2: 54.5 ± 12.1 mL/kg/min) initially provided informed written consent to participate in this study that was approved according to the Declaration of Helsinki by the University Review Board (IRB#17-0148). These 23 athletes represented a variety of sport backgrounds that included volleyball (n = 5), track (n = 9), American football (n = 1), and men’s basketball (n = 8). After providing informed written consent, the 23 pre-season athletes were enrolled and evaluated.
Height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer (Seca Model 216, Hanover, MD, USA) along with weight and body composition via 8-point bioelectrical impedance analysis (Seca, Model MBCA514, Hanover, MD, USA). VO2 max via the Bruce protocol treadmill stress test was used to evaluate cardiorespiratory fitness. Expired gases were measured using a metabolic cart (Parvomedics True 2400). Resting energy expenditure was evaluated using the Shofield Equation according to the World Health Organization Joint Expert Consultation on Human Energy Requirements [24,27,28] with a standardized physical activity level of 1.8 relevant to the pre-season condition [28]. All athletes rested sitting for >5 min before their BP was measured according to ACSM standardized guidelines [1]. High BP (HBP) was defined according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Executive Summary: systolic BP > 120 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 80 mmHg [16,17]. HBP was further classified as Stage I hypertension if systolic < 139 or diastolic < 89; else, Stage II.

2.2. Dietary Recall

After the laboratory evaluations were completed, participants completed a food recall interview to assess their nutritional intake using the Nutritional Data System for Research (NDSR) [29,30,31]. The NDSR has been previously validated using doubly labeled water and proved to be an accurate method to assess energy intake [29,31]. The NDSR uses a three-day non-consecutive food recall that includes two weekdays and one weekend day over a week-long period. After logging their daily nutritional intake which included the time of day, food content, and the amount of food they consumed per item, a sports dietitian performed a 5-step dietary review of their food records and clarified the nutritional food logs. The 5-step dietary review increased the specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility of the energy and nutrient intake while reducing bias [29,31] amongst the food logs reviewed.

2.3. Low Energy Balance (LEA) Assessment

Energy balance was defined as the equitable contribution of energy intake and energy expenditure.
Energy balance = (energy expenditure − energy intake)
Energy and nutrient intake compositions were quantified using the NDSR to assess LEA while energy expenditure was estimated as described above. LEA was defined as an athlete consuming less energy than required for their estimated daily energy expenditure and quantified as a negative energy balance. When athletes do not consume enough energy to meet their energy expenditure demands, LEA is present. When LEA becomes a chronic condition, athletes can experience a deleterious systematic function [5,6,24] known as relative energy deficiency syndrome (RED-S), perpetuating a stress response that can induce HTN [3,5,10,12].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis strategy focused on descriptive and exploratory measures of association and differences. The small sample size could not support additional model-based methods such as covariate adjustment (e.g., for the various sports) or model-based methods that might account for confounding factors known to influence both HBP and LEA. Consequently, inferential methods such as hypothesis testing and use of p-values were not appropriate. This report relied on Spearman correlation coefficients, standardized mean differences with pooled estimates of variance (as suggested by Cohen [32]), 95% confidence interval estimates, and the odds ratio (OR) for the relationship between two binary variables: P1 = caloric deficiency (yes, no) and P2 = HBP (yes, no).

3. Results

Prevalence of HBP was greater among the 14 participants with LEA, P1 = 78.6% [CI: 57%, 100%] relative to the 9 participants without LEA, P2 = 22.2%, [CI: 0%, 49%]. Individual comparisons are shown within Figure 1. Estimates of the difference between the two proportions were P1 − P2 = 56.4% [22%, 91%]. The estimate of the Spearman correlation between P1 and P2 was R = 0.56 [0.21, 0.90] (Table 1). These data are consistent with the suggestion that those with LEA may be 12 times more likely to experience HBP (OR = 12.8).
Micronutrient profiles for the athletes with HBP and caloric deficiency are shown in Table 2. All nutrients (macronutrients and micronutrients) were resoundingly deficient in the 13 athletes with HBP compared to the 10 without HBP.

4. Discussion

The purpose of this observational study was to investigate the relationship between LEA and nutritional intake on BP in Black Division I athletes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the nutritional influence on HBP and separately the first to consider Black athletes. Previous research that did not consider race has shown a 3% prevalence of HBP [3,12] in athletes with an 85% chance that following diagnosis, HBP will worsen over the course of the competitive season [3]. While our sample was assessed during the pre-season, 14/23 or 56% suffered from HBP, indicating a moderate relationship (Figure 1, Table 1). However, when further evaluating the 14/23 athletes who suffered from HBP, 1l/14 or 78.6% were calorically deficient with an average deficiency of −529 ± 695 kcal that was mirrored by the deficient micronutrient intake.
The IOC on Sports Nutrition [5] describes a dose-dependent relationship with LEA and metabolic/hormonal dysfunction [9] perpetuating a stress response that can result in cardiovascular disease as a chronic condition [3,10,11,12] known as RED-S [5]. In our sample, 10/11 who had adequate energy availability met the IOC’s recommendations of >45 kcal/kg FFM/day, while 8/12 of those who were hypertensive did not meet the IOC’s recommendations [5]. Interestingly, the IOC acknowledges a universal absence of minorities within the reported literature, making this a novel study and expressing the need for more rigorous studies investigating nutrition and cardiovascular disease in minority athletes. For instance, student athletes, in general, experience a heightened risk of RED-S and/or cardiovascular disease due to the lack of understanding of what conditions perpetuate HBP [21], which our results support. The risks of physiological dysfunction, that include cardiovascular are further compounded due to a lack of understanding of nutrient needs among the athletic population that leads to false perceptions, unhealthy eating behaviors [24,34,35], and an inverse relationship with nutrition knowledge and body fat [35]. Student athletes are consistently deprived of adequate energy while maintaining high physical workloads that result in adverse effects that include cardiovascular dysfunction, illness, endocrine dysfunction including amenorrhea and bone density depletion, amongst others [5,14,22,24,25]. Physiological dysfunction is further compounded by the inadequate consumption of macronutrients, which were universally deficient in those with high blood pressure (Table 2). However, macronutrient deficiencies were likely to occur with LEA considering those with HBP in our sample maintained an average deficiency of −529 ± 695 kcal, while the normotensive had a positive energy balance of +624 ± 1120 kcal: a 1163 kcal difference. Our results indicate that 86% of those with LEA suffered from HBP exacerbating morbidity when compared to the previous literature that reports a 3% prevalence of hypertension amongst athletes [3,12].
An athlete’s cardiovascular adaptation to exercise stress during the competitive season is generally positive. Cardiovascular adaptations as a result of training include increased heart chamber dimension, heart wall thickness, and increased microvasculature, all of which improve cardiovascular performance including BP regulation [14,15]. Paradoxically, despite the vast network of positive cardiovascular adaptations to exercise, athletes in our sample still exhibited HBP that commonly go undiagnosed [21,26] and is further complicated by family history and body composition changes [11,12,35]. However, throughout the competitive season, athletes are known to express higher levels of psychological stress and endure high frequencies of long-duration high intensity exercise paired with travel and academic expectations [11,24] that can compromise cardiovascular health [22]. LEA and frequent competitions can increase the allosteric load that can negatively resonate as elevated BP if it becomes a chronic condition [11,22], which can be described as RED-S but has yet to be observed within the literature. Hypertension is the most observed cardiovascular disease within athletic populations [3,12], while those with elevated BP were shown to have a 1.7× higher risk for development of hypertension in a five year follow-up [36]. Furthermore, in 2008, the NIH developed a screening protocol with recommendations to evaluate athletes for pre-participation heart disease to reduce the risk of sudden death in athletes [26], while 80% of all SCD in athletes are the result of cardiomyopathy which is directly related to hypertension [19]. The current screening recommendations include pre-participation health screening, while the competitive season has been shown to exacerbate HBP in American-style football collegiate athletes [11]. Therefore, RED-S may contribute to the heightened risk of cardiac events despite the current screening methods [26] that often go unchecked after pre-participation screens, of which our results agree (Figure 1).
Micronutrients are known to affect cardiovascular behavior due to underconsumption, overconsumption, and/or lack of diversity with dietary intake [7]. Moreover, due to LEA and the inherent activities and environments in which athletes participate, athletes are prone to nutrient deficiencies that can elevate the risk of HBP [5,7,22,25]. Known micronutrients that influence hemodynamics include but are not limited to the following: sodium, calcium, omega-3 fatty acids, and iron, amongst others. In this study, the micronutrient consumption of those with HBP was uniformly deficient when compared to normotensive athletes (Table 2). This is not surprising in that LEA is inherently nutrient-deficient, and therefore the opportunity to consume adequate nutrients is diminished. While LEA is shown to be common in athletes [5,24,25], the moderate relationship with LEA and HBP (Table 1) reinforces the concern originally published by the IOC [5,8] where 78.5% percent of Black D1 athletes with LEA in this sample expressed cardiovascular morbidity (Figure 1). These findings further indicate that the previously reported HBP at a rate of 3% amongst athletes may be underestimating morbidity rates among athletes when considering the 2018 Executive Summary revising the BP guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association on Clinical Practice Guidelines [16,17] that could be further exacerbated by LEA.
The diversification of dietary intake that includes adequate quantities of micronutrients is integral to support both performance and athlete health [5,7,26]. Moreover, independent of energy intake, micronutrient deficiencies have been shown to affect cardiometabolic function: (1) calcium, necessary for muscle contraction that includes cardiac and smooth muscle control was 25.1% deficient in those with HBP (Table 2). Previous studies indicate that deficiencies in calcium elevate hemodynamic function through mechanisms that activate vasoconstriction [7,37], including intracellular smooth muscle vasculature calcium concentrations, parathyroid function, and activation of the renin-angiotensin system [37]. (2) Vitamin D intake was 32% deficient in those with HBP compared to the normotensive which was shown to increase cardiovascular risk factors [38,39] that include incidence of hypertension and/or SCD [38]. Adequate vitamin D intake is also known to affect calcium absorption downregulating the renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting renin production and improving arterial compliance [38]. (3) Omega-3 FAs are shown to be critical for cardiovascular and neurologic development [40,41]. A recent study of >400 D1 collegiate football players indicated that all athletes evaluated were considered to have an intermediate or high risk of cardiovascular disease [40]. Our sample echoed their findings using the Omega-3 index (Omega-3 index = Omega-3 FAs ÷ total fat × 100) where 90% of the athletes in our sample, regardless of hemostatic function were considered high risk (<4% total fat intake) using the same criteria. However, the Omega-3 deficiency contribution to HBP in our sample is further explained by the 23.4% deficiency compared to the normotensive. (5) Iron is a necessary micronutrient shown to affect cardiovascular function contributing to the formation of hemoglobin for O2 transport. Athletes are known to suffer from iron deficiency as a result of their training due to losses from mechanical hemolysis, intestinal bleeding, hematuria, sweating, and poor intestinal absorption which can promote anemia [42,43]. Furthermore, iron deficiencies can occur during strenuous physical activity and energy deficits due to the overproduction of hepcidin, a regulatory iron-absorbing hormone [43]. In our sample, those with HBP consumed 54% iron when compared to the normotensive, which can negatively influence cardiometabolic function in those who cannot supplement iron loss as a result of high training loads paired with a negative energy balance (LEA).
The strengths of this study are that it is the first of its kind to investigate nutritional factors and their relationship to HBP in Black D1 athletes. However, this study has several limitations. First, all subjects were African American which limits generalizability. Second, the small sample size does not allow us to address the imbalanced representation of the various sports and other characteristics. Third, the small sample size does not allow us to address biases due to confounding factors; e.g., psychological stress, lack of sleep, obesity, alcohol, and nicotine are known to affect appetite and hemodynamic function. These and other confounders went unmeasured in this study and should be addressed in future investigations to more accurately assess the relationship between LEA and HBP. Fourth, as a consequence of those limitations the data may provide evidence of association but cannot support conclusions about cause and effect.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we observed a moderate association between LEA and HBP in Black Division I athletes, thus suggesting a relationship with cardiovascular disease and RED-S. While this observational study was conducted with a small sample of Black Division I athletes (n = 23), it is the first to consider RED-S and nutrient deficiencies that predicate cardiovascular dysfunction first published by the IOC. Beyond performance decrements, the caloric deficits athletes experience have deleterious physiological consequences when chronic, that include observed dysfunction in cardiovascular, endocrine, renal, reproductive, skeletal, and muscular systems. Even more concerning is that LEA can significantly increase the risk of hypertension onset which may lead to SCD. The cardiovascular dysfunction that athletes experience can promote lifelong morbidity. Educating athletes and their support staff on how to meet energy/nutrient intake recommendations while increasing nutritional awareness can reduce the consequences of nutrition mismanagement and positively influence both the heath and performance of the athletic community.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.P.; methodology, T.P. and P.S.; formal analysis, T.P. and P.S.; investigation, M.C., H.C. and L.S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, T.P.; writing—review and editing, T.P., M.C., H.C. and L.S.D.; funding acquisition, M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

uBiome PI Grant-2019 to Marc Cook.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study involving human participants was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (IRB#17-0148, Date of Approval 4/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

A special thank you to NCAT Athletics including the athletes and coaches who participated in this study. In addition, we thank Athletic Director Earl Hilton III for his trust, support, and effort to forward our collaboration.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 10th ed.; Reibe, D., Ehrman, J., Liguori, G., Magal, M., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781609136055. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kirkham, A.A.; Beka, V.; Prado, C.M. The effect of caloric restriction on blood pressure and cardiovascular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Leddy, J.J.; Izzo, J. Hypertension in athletes. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2009, 11, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Booth, F.W.; Roberts, C.K.; Laye, M.J. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Compr. Physiol. 2012, 2, 1143–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mountjoy, M.; Sundgot-Borgen, J.K.; Burke, L.M.; Ackerman, K.E.; Blauwet, C.; Constantini, N.; Lebrun, C.; Lundy, B.; Melin, A.K.; Meyer, N.L.; et al. IOC consensus statement on relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S): 2018 update. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Maughan, R.J.; Burke, L.M.; Dvorak, J.; Larson-Meyer, D.E.; Peeling, P.; Phillips, S.M.; Rawson, E.S.; Walsh, N.P.; Garthe, I.; Geyer, H.; et al. IOC consensus statement: Dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. Br. J. Sports Med. 2018, 52, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Thomas, D.T.; Erdman, K.A.; Burke, L.M. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 501–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maughan, R.J.; Burke, L.M.; Coyle, E.F. Foods, Nutrition, and Sports Performance II.; Taylor and Francis: London, UK, 2004; ISBN 0203448618. [Google Scholar]
  9. Burke, L.M.; Loucks, A.B.; Broad, N. Energy and carbohydrate for training and recovery. J. Sports Sci. 2006, 24, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ziegler, M.G.; Milic, M. Sympathetic nerves and hypertension in stress, sleep apnea, and caregiving. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2017, 26, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weiner, R.B.; Wang, F.; Isaacs, S.K.; Malhotra, R.; Berkstresser, B.; Kim, J.H.; Hutter, A.M.; Picard, M.H.; Wang, T.J.; Baggish, A.L. Blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy during American-style football participation. Circulation 2013, 128, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Dixit, S.; DiFiori, J. Hypertension in Athletes; UpToDate: Waltham, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tucker, A.M.; Vogel, R.A.; Lincoln, A.E.; Dunn, R.E.; Ahrensfield, D.C.; Allen, T.W.; Castle, L.W.; Heyer, R.A.; Pellman, E.J.; Strollo, P.J.; et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among national football league players. JAMA—J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2009, 301, 2111–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hellsten, Y.; Nyberg, M. Cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arbab-Zadeh, A.; Perhonen, M.; Howden, E.; Peshock, R.M.; Zhang, R.; Adams-Huet, B.; Haykowsky, M.J.; Levine, B.D. Cardiac remodeling in response to 1 year of intensive endurance training. Circulation 2014, 130, 2152–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E.; Collins, K.J.; Himmelfarb, C.D.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: Executive summary: A report of the American college of cardiology/American Heart Association task. Hypertension 2018, 71, 1269–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reboussin, D.M.; Allen, N.B.; Griswold, M.E.; Guallar, E.; Hong, Y.; Lackland, D.T.; Miller, E.P.R.; Polonsky, T.; Thompson-Paul, A.M.; Vupputuri, S. Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 2176–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Karpinos, A.R.; Roumie, C.L.; Nian, H.; Diamond, A.B.; Rothman, R.L. High prevalence of hypertension among collegiate football athletes. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2013, 6, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Morentin, B.; Suárez-Mier, M.P.; Monzó, A.; Molina, P.; Lucena, J.S. Sports-related sudden cardiac death due to myocardial diseases on a population from 1–35 years: A multicentre forensic study in Spain. Forensic Sci. Res. 2019, 4, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Kirkham, A.A.; Beaudry, R.I.; Paterson, D.I.; Mackey, J.R.; Haykowsky, M.J. Curing breast cancer and killing the heart: A novel model to explain elevated cardiovascular disease and mortality risk among women with early stage breast cancer. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 62, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wasfy, M.M.; Hutter, A.M.; Weiner, R.B. Sudden Cardiac Death in Athletes. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2016, 12, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ackerman, K.E.; Holtzman, B.; Cooper, K.M.; Flynn, E.F.; Bruinvels, G.; Tenforde, A.S.; Popp, K.L.; Simpkin, A.J.; Parziale, A.L. Low energy availability surrogates correlate with health and performance consequences of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019, 53, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spaulding-Barclay, M.A.; Stern, J.; Mehler, P.S. Cardiac changes in anorexia nervosa. Cardiol. Young 2016, 26, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jagim, A.R.; Zabriskie, H.; Currier, B.; Harty, P.S.; Stecker, R.; Kerksick, C.M. Nutrient Status and perceptions of energy and macronutrient intake in a Group of Collegiate Female Lacrosse Athletes. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2019, 16, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Logue, D.M.; Madigan, S.M.; Melin, A.; Delahunt, E.; Heinen, M.; Donnell, S.M.; Corish, C.A. Low Energy Availability in Athletes 2020: An Updated Narrative Review of Prevalence, Risk, Within-Day Energy Balance, Knowledge, and Impact on Sports Performance. Nutrients 2020, 12, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Crawford, M.H. Screening athletes for heart disease. Heart 2007, 93, 875–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Human Energy Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2005; Volume 26.
  28. Schofield, W. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 1985, 39, 5–41. [Google Scholar]
  29. Burke, L.; Deakin, V. (Eds.) Clinical Sports Nutrition, 5th ed.; McGraw Hill: Sydney, Australia, 2015; ISBN 1743073682. [Google Scholar]
  30. Colleran, B.H.L.; Wideman, L.; Lovelady, C.A. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc. 2012, 44, 1570–1579. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shim, J.-S.; Oh, K.; Kim, H.C. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol. Health 2014, 36, e2014009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Moshfegh, A.J.; Rhodes, D.G.; Baer, D.J.; Murayi, T.; Clemens, J.C.; Rumpler, W.V.; Paul, D.R.; Sebastian, R.S.; Kuczynski, K.J.; Ingwersen, L.A.; et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Jacob, C. The Statistical Power of Abnorma-Social Psychological Research: A Review, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New York, NY, USA, 1962; ISBN 88-12110. [Google Scholar]
  34. Muntner, P.; Carey, R.M.; Gidding, S.; Jones, D.W.; Taler, S.J.; Wright, J.T.; Whelton, P.K.; Potential, U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jagim, A.; Fields, J.; Magee, M.; Kerksick, C.; Luedke, J.; Erickson, J. The influence of sport nutrition knowledge on body composition and perceptions of dietary requirements in collegiate athletes. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Manolio, T.A.; Savage, P.J.; Sidney, S.; Gardin, J.M.; Oberman, A. Exercise blood pressure response and 5-year risk of elevated blood pressure in a cohort of young adults: The cardia study. Am. J. Hypertens. 1994, 7, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Villa-Etchegoyen, C.; Lombarte, M.; Matamoros, N.; Belizán, J.M.; Cormick, G. Mechanisms involved in the relationship between low calcium intake and high blood pressure. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Judd, S.E.; Tangpricha, V. Vitamin D deficiency and risk for cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2009, 338, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Puente Yagüe, M.; Yurrita, L.C.; Cabañas, M.J.C.; Cenzual, M.A. Role of Vitamin D in Athletes and Their Performance: Current Concepts and New Trends. Nutrients 2020, 12, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Anzalone, A.; Carbuhn, A.; Jones, L.; Gallop, A.; Smith, A.; Johnson, P.; Swearingen, L.; Moore, C.; Rimer, E.; McBeth, J.; et al. The omega-3 index in National collegiate athletic Association division I collegiate football athletes. J. Athl. Train. 2019, 54, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Thielecke, F.; Blannin, A. Omega-3 fatty acids for sport performance—Are they equally beneficial for athletes and amateurs? A narrative review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chatard, J.C.; Mujika, I.; Guy, C.; Lacour, J.R. Anemia and iron deficiency in athletes. Practical recommendations for treatment. Sport. Med. 1999, 27, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hennigar, S.R.; McClung, J.P.; Hatch-McChesney, A.; Allen, J.T.; Wilson, M.A.; Carrigan, C.T.; Murphy, N.E.; Teien, H.K.; Martini, S.; Gwin, J.A.; et al. Energy deficit increases hepcidin and exacerbates declines in dietary iron absorption following strenuous physical activity: A randomized-controlled cross-over trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 113, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Individual distribution of systolic blood pressure (BP) according to energy balance assessment in kilocalories (Kcals). Energy balance was defined as equitable energy expenditure and energy intake. Dotted lines represent the mean energy intake of normotensive group (n = 10) in blue while the high blood pressure group mean (n = 13) is shown in red.
Figure 1. Individual distribution of systolic blood pressure (BP) according to energy balance assessment in kilocalories (Kcals). Energy balance was defined as equitable energy expenditure and energy intake. Dotted lines represent the mean energy intake of normotensive group (n = 10) in blue while the high blood pressure group mean (n = 13) is shown in red.
Sports 11 00081 g001
Table 1. Spearman correlation (n = 23) according to the two dichotomous variables, high blood pressure [15,16,33] and caloric deficiency (energy intake < energy expenditure) [5,6,23]. In addition, point estimates are calculated according to (yes, no) as a percentage with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Table 1. Spearman correlation (n = 23) according to the two dichotomous variables, high blood pressure [15,16,33] and caloric deficiency (energy intake < energy expenditure) [5,6,23]. In addition, point estimates are calculated according to (yes, no) as a percentage with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
Blood PressurePoint Estimate95% CI
HighNormalTotal
Caloric DeficiencyYes11314P1 = 0.79[0.57, 1.00]
No279P2 = 0.22[0.00, 0.49]
Total131023P1 − P2 = 0.564[0.22, 0.91]
Spearman Correlation CoefficientR = 0.56)[0.21, 0.90]
Table 2. Group comparisons according to the binary variables high blood pressure (HBP) and caloric deficiency (yes vs. no). Values are expressed as group means, minimum (min) and maximum (max) recorded value, and standard deviation (SD). (TEE): predicted total energy expenditure; (kcal): kilocalorie; (mmHg): milometers of mercury; (g): grams; (PUFA): polyunsaturated fatty acid; (Omega3): omega three fatty acid; (mg) milligram.
Table 2. Group comparisons according to the binary variables high blood pressure (HBP) and caloric deficiency (yes vs. no). Values are expressed as group means, minimum (min) and maximum (max) recorded value, and standard deviation (SD). (TEE): predicted total energy expenditure; (kcal): kilocalorie; (mmHg): milometers of mercury; (g): grams; (PUFA): polyunsaturated fatty acid; (Omega3): omega three fatty acid; (mg) milligram.
ENERGY BALANCE AND BLOOD PRESSURE
VariableHBPMeanSD
TEE (kcal)N2952.5404
Y3336.4716
TEI (kcal)N3767.51158
Y2739.41087.0
Systolic BP (mmHg)N117.83.6
Y132.210.0
Diastolic BP (mmHg)N74.04.2
Y81.96.6
MACRONUTRIENTS
Carbohydrate (g)N499.2202.6
Y344.7126.6
Protein (g)N135.434.5
Y10957.1
Lipids (g)N14342.8
Y106.244.4
MICRONUTRIENTS
PUFA (g)N40.714.6
Y28.815.1
Omega3 (g)N3.71.0
Y2.91.7
Sodium (mg)N57501759
Y49382470
Calcium (mg)N1436536
Y1077589
Vitamin D (mg)N7.77.6
Y5.25.2
Iron (mg)N28.415.3
Y15.46.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Purdom, T.; Cook, M.; Colleran, H.; Stewart, P.; San Diego, L. Low Energy Availability (LEA) and Hypertension in Black Division I Collegiate Athletes: A Novel Pilot Study. Sports 2023, 11, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11040081

AMA Style

Purdom T, Cook M, Colleran H, Stewart P, San Diego L. Low Energy Availability (LEA) and Hypertension in Black Division I Collegiate Athletes: A Novel Pilot Study. Sports. 2023; 11(4):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11040081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Purdom, Troy, Marc Cook, Heather Colleran, Paul Stewart, and Lauren San Diego. 2023. "Low Energy Availability (LEA) and Hypertension in Black Division I Collegiate Athletes: A Novel Pilot Study" Sports 11, no. 4: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11040081

APA Style

Purdom, T., Cook, M., Colleran, H., Stewart, P., & San Diego, L. (2023). Low Energy Availability (LEA) and Hypertension in Black Division I Collegiate Athletes: A Novel Pilot Study. Sports, 11(4), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11040081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop