Next Article in Journal
Psychodynamic Therapies for the Treatment of Substance Addictions: A PRISMA Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamic Quantitative Imaging of the Masseter Muscles in Bruxism Patients with Myofascial Pain: Could It Be an Objective Biomarker?
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening Analysis in Korean Pregnant Women: Six Years of Experience and a Retrospective Study of 9327 Patients Analyzed from 2017 to 2022

J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(10), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101468
by Ji Eun Park 1,†, Kyung Min Kang 1,†, Hyunjin Kim 1, Hee Yeon Jang 1, Minyeon Go 1, So Hyun Yang 1, Daeun Jeong 2, Hyeonmin Jeong 2, Jong Chul Kim 1, Seo Young Lim 2, Dong Hyun Cha 1,3,* and Sung Han Shim 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13(10), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13101468
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 22 September 2023 / Accepted: 27 September 2023 / Published: 6 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Methodology, Drug and Device Discovery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The quality both of figure 1 and 2 show vague for publication. It needed replace by the clear figures. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you

JE Park

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Author/s,

The manuscript titled "Cell-free fetal DNA screening analysis in Korean pregnant women: Six years of experience and a retrospective study of 932 patients analyzed from 2017 to 2022" is a valuable contribution to the field. With a few minor revisions, the clarity and impact of your findings can be further enhanced.

Suggestive changes

1.      Abstract: Page 1, Line 17: Remove the word ‘testing’ out of two.

 2.      Statistical analysis, Page 4, Line 140: ‘The data were analyzed using R’, Define this sentence.

 3.      Figure 1, page 4, Line 154: Elaborate about the figure.

 4.      Table 7, page 9: Correct the spelling of ‘True’.

 5.      Page 9, Line 297: ‘when the average maternal weight is 160 kg’… recheck the data about average weight because this is impossible.

 6.   Page 10, Line 337-338: these findings need to be discussed comparatively with other studies.

 7.      Page 10, Line 347-349: add a citation for this statement.

 8.  Page 11, Line 358: ‘The no-call group showed a higher prevalence (2.7%’…. in this sentence erase the bracket. 

 

Minor corrections are required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Thank you

JE Park

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop