Next Article in Journal
Reliability of Vertical Jump Force-Time Metrics in Collegiate Athletes Compared to Recreationally Active Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Lingyuanfructus: The First Fossil Angiosperm with Naked Seeds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancing Duodenoscope Reprocessing with Alginate-Coated Calcium Peroxide Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biofabrication of Terminalia ferdinandiana-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Properties

by
Weerakkodige Hansi Sachintha Alwis
1,
Vinuthaa Murthy
1,*,
Hao Wang
1,
Roshanak Khandanlou
1 and
Richard Weir
2
1
Faculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia
2
Berrimah Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Darwin, NT 0801, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2025, 15(12), 1829; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15121829 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 7 November 2025 / Revised: 23 November 2025 / Accepted: 25 November 2025 / Published: 28 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Applications of Nanobiotechnology in Medicine and Health)

Abstract

Harnessing nature’s chemistry, this study explores the enhanced biomedical potential of Terminalia ferdinandiana Exell (Kakadu Plum) by transforming its aqueous leaf and fruit extracts into bio-inspired gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The synthesis process was optimized by varying the Au3+/extract ratio and pH, with nanoparticle formation verified through UV–visible spectrophotometry, TEM, and DLS analyzes. Kakadu Leaf extract–conjugated AuNPs (AuKLs), synthesized at pH 8 with a 1:25 Au3+/extract ratio, produced the smallest and most uniform particles (21.1 nm; PDI 0.17). In contrast, fruit extract alone failed to generate stable nanoparticles, highlighting the pivotal role of leaf phytochemicals as natural reducing and stabilizing agents. Biological evaluations revealed that both the crude leaf extract and AuKLs possessed strong antioxidant capacity, while the AuKLs further exhibited selective anticancer activity effectively inhibiting breast cancer (MCF-7) and human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cell proliferation without harming normal mammalian breast (MCF10A) cells. A combined 2:1 leaf-to-fruit extract formulation yielded well-stabilized AuNPs (AuKPLs) with biomedical properties comparable to AuKLs, though the fruit extract alone contributed minimally to both nanoparticle formation and biological performance. Overall, this study demonstrates that the phytochemical richness of T. ferdinandiana leaves enables the green synthesis of small, stable, and bioactive gold nanoparticles. The resulting nanoconjugates, AuKLs and AuKPLs, hold considerable promise for future pharmacological and therapeutic applications, bridging traditional plant-based medicine with modern nanotechnology.

1. Introduction

Among the different types of nanoparticles, AuNPs possess tuneable sizes, multifunctionality, and biocompatibility, making them highly suitable for diverse applications such as drug delivery, bioimaging, and therapeutic interventions, as well as catalysts in chemical reactions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. For instance, Faid et al. [9] demonstrated the use of AuNPs as a drug carrier for the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin to cancer cells, and the AuNP-doxorubicin nanocomposite showed increased cytotoxicity on the MCF7 breast cancer cell line compared to free doxorubicin. This dual functionality of AuNPs enhances their effectiveness in targeting cancer cells [10,11] while minimizing the side effects associated with conventional chemotherapy, making them a promising avenue for future cancer treatments.
In our previous study [12], we reported the synthesis of well-defined silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) utilizing T. ferdinandiana extracts and their improved antimicrobial activities. In the current study, we introduce the benefits of synthesizing gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using T. ferdinandiana extracts, emphasizing their potential anticancer properties.
The green synthesis method [12] was used to synthesize AuNPs as it employs environmentally friendly techniques using natural resources [13,14]. This green method does not use any organic solvents or chemicals of traditional methods, which often involve hazardous chemicals and generate toxic by-products, posing environmental and health risks [14,15]. Thus, the green synthesis of AuNPs using plant extracts involves the reduction of Au ions (Au3+) to AuNPs (Au0) using the natural reducing and capping agents present in plant extracts [13]. Plant extracts contain a wide array of bioactive compounds, such as polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, and terpenoids, which exhibit significant reducing properties [16] that can effectively reduce metal ions during nanoparticle synthesis [17] by donating electrons, leading to the formation of nanoparticles [18]. For example, Lee et al. [19] successfully synthesized AuNPs using the flavonoid quercetin as a reductant in a green synthesis approach, highlighting its potential in nano-architectonic applications. Additionally, some phytochemicals found in plants play a crucial role as capping and stabilizing agents [16]. These biomolecules adhere to the surface of nanoparticles, preventing aggregation and improving stability. The presence of capping agents also impacts the size, shape, and surface properties of the synthesized nanoparticles, contributing to their overall stability and functionality [16,20]. Researchers have shown substantial interest in using green synthesized AuNPs for cancer therapy and drug delivery. Numerous studies have proven the anticancer efficacy of green-synthesized AuNPs utilizing various plant extracts [21,22,23,24] against a wide range of cancer cell types, such as breast cancer [21,25,26], melanoma [26], human liver cancer [25,26,27], lung carcinoma [27], bladder cancer [28], human prostate cancer [29], and human gastric carcinoma [30].
The work in this study aimed to produce environmentally friendly small, well-stabilized AuNPs by utilizing phytocomponents present in T. ferdinandiana leaves and fruits. As discussed in the previous paper [12], several studies have revealed the in vitro antibacterial [29,31], antioxidant [32], anti-inflammatory [33], and anticancer [29,34] properties of T. ferdinandiana. Where our previous research [12] indicated that the AgNPs conjugated with T. ferdinandiana extracts have significant antibacterial activity, in this study, we concentrate on the synthesis of AuNPs to evaluate their anticancer properties.
However, to the best of our knowledge, the T. ferdinandiana-mediated green synthesis of AuNPs has not yet been reported. The effects of different parameters, such as pH and Au3+ ion/aqueous extract ratio, on the synthesis of small, well-stabilized AuNPs, were investigated. The synthesized AuNPs were evaluated for their antioxidant properties and anticancer activity on human cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells, breast cancer (MCF7) cells, and normal mammalian breast (MCF10A) cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material

Fresh leaves and fruits of T. ferdinandiana were collected from Charles Darwin University (CDU), NT, (12°36′91” S, 130°86′68″ E), Australia. The voucher specimen is deposited at the Northern Territory Herbarium in Darwin, NT (D0293019 [Weerakkodige, H.A. s.n.]). Tetrachloroauric(III) acid trihydrate, (99.9%) (HAuCl4.3H2O), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (D8418), and AR-Grade methanol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Melbourne, Victoria (VIC), Australia. 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Scoresby, VIC, Australia. Cell lines, including MCF7 human breast adenocarcinoma cells, were purchased from Merck Life Science Pty Ltd., Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia. HeLa cells were obtained from the Berrimah Veterinary Laboratory, NT, Australia, and MCF10A cells were obtained from the NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia. Modified Eagle’s Medium (MEM), the Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium, and Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA. The mammary epithelial cell basal medium (MEBM) was purchased from Lonza, Norwest, NSW, Australia.

2.2. Preparation of the Leaf and Fruit Extract

The fresh leaves and fruit of T. ferdinandiana were washed with high-purity water (HPW) until no foreign material remained, then stored in a freezer (−18 °C) until processed. The extraction of T. ferdinandiana fruit and leaf was performed according to the method described in previous work [12]. Both extracts were vacuum filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper (purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Parkville, VIC, Australia), followed by 0.45 µm filtration (Sartorius Australia Pty. Ltd., Dandenong South, VIC, Australia). The filtrates were kept at 4 °C for future studies. The qualitative analysis of the major phytochemicals in T. ferdinandiana was performed using a UPLC-MS (ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) system. The detailed analytical procedures and conditions for the UPLC-MS analysis are presented in the previous paper [12].

2.3. The Optimization Process of AuNPs

T. ferdinandiana fruit or leaf extracts were mixed with an aqueous solution of HAuCl4 to synthesize AuNPs. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min and then incubated overnight at room temperature.
Similarly to our synthesis of AgNPs [12], the optimal conditions for the biosynthesis of T. ferdinandiana AuNPs were investigated by examining the ratio of Au ions/extract (w/w) and the pH value of the reaction mixture (ranging from 4 to 10). Five different ratios of Au ions/extract (1:20, 1:25, 1:33, 1:50, and 1:100 in mg) were evaluated by combining the extracts with a 5.0 mM HAuCl4 solution. The mass ratios represent the mass of Au3+ in the 5 mM HAuCl4 solution in relation to the mass of the plant extract. The completion of the synthesis of nanoparticles was monitored by visualization of the colour change (from yellow to deep red), indicating the reduction process of Au3+ to Au0 nanoparticles. Additionally, AuNPs synthesized using a mixture of leaf and fruit extracts were prepared using a similar methodology.

2.4. Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

The mean hydrodynamic diameter, PDI (polydispersity index), and UV-Vis (ultraviolet-visible) spectra were measured to determine the optimal conditions for synthesizing small and homogenized AuNPs. UV-Vis spectroscopy (Varian, Cary 100) Agilent Technologies, VIC Australia, was employed to confirm the formation of AuNPs, with spectra recorded at wavelengths ranging from 300 nm to 800 nm. In order to maintain the absorbance of AuNPs within the 0.1 to 1.0 range, each sample was diluted with HPW at a ratio of 1:100, before measurement. The mean hydrodynamic diameter, size distribution, and zeta potential of the AuNPs were measured using a Nanoparticle Analyzer SZ-100 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). The zeta potential was measured to assess the surface charge of the AuNPs, which is indicative of their stability in solution [35]. To prevent inter-particle interactions and multiple scattering, samples were diluted with HPW at a ratio of 1:100. The particle size and microscopic morphology of the AuNPs were examined using a JEOL 2100 TEM operating at 120 kV, conducted at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland (Qld), Australia.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity Assay

The antioxidant potential of the T. ferdinandiana extracts and synthesized AuNPs was evaluated using a DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical scavenging assay, following a previous method [12]. Briefly, 1 mL of each methanolic sample of T. ferdinandiana extracts and AuNPs, prepared at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 mg/mL (expressed in terms of extract content), was combined with 1 mL of a 1.0 mM DPPH methanolic solution.
Percentage inhibition of DPPH oxidation was calculated using Equation (1).
D P P H   s c a v e n g i n g   e f f e c t % = A c o n t r o l A s a m p l e A c o n t r o l × 100
where A c o n t r o l is the absorbance of the DPPH solution and A s a m p l e is the absorbance of the test sample.

2.6. Anticancer Assays

The three cell lines used for the study, MCF7, HeLa, and MCF10A, were grown in different culture media. The MCF7 cells were grown in Modified Eagle’s Medium (MEM) supplemented with 2.2 g/L L-glutamine, 10.0% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% antibiotic/antimitotic (100 units of penicillin, 0.1 mg of streptomycin and 0.25 µg of amphotericin). The HeLa cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 Medium with 2.2 g/L L-glutamine, 10.0% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic/antimitotic (100 units of penicillin, 0.1 mg of streptomycin, and 0.25 µg of amphotericin). The MCF10A cells were cultured in Mammary Epithelial cell Basal Medium (MEBM) supplemented with mammary epithelial cell growth medium SingleQuots kit; 500 mL of medium containing 2 mL of bovine pituitary extract, 0.5 mL of human epidermal growth factor, insulin (0.1%), 0.5 mL of hydrocortisone (0.1%), and 0.5 mL of gentamicin-amphotericin (GA-1000; 0.1%). All cells were incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2.
A MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was carried out to study the in vitro anticancer activity of T. ferdinandiana plant extracts and AuNPs on MCF7, HeLa, and MCF10A cells using the established method reported by previous researchers [36]. For MTT analysis, 150 μL of 1 × 105 suspended cells were seeded into flat-bottom 96-well plates and incubated for 72 h at 37 °C. The cells were then treated with different concentrations (0.156–5.000 mg/mL, in terms of dry extract) of 150 μL of each extract and AuNPs and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Following a 24 hr incubation period, the medium containing the extract and AuNPs was removed. Further, the wells were washed with warm (37 °C) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to ensure the removal of traces of the coloured extract. Then, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL of MTT was added to each well and incubated for another four hours. The purple formazan crystals that formed were dissolved by adding 100 μL of 100% DMSO into each well. The absorbance was recorded with an ELISA microplate reader (xMark™, BIO-RAD, Gladesville, NSW, Australia) at 570 nm, and optical density (OD) was used to determine the cell viability. The percentage cell viability the of cells was calculated using Equation (2):
C e l l   v i a b i l i t y   ( % ) = A s a m p l e A c o n t r o l × 100
where A c o n t r o l is the absorbance of untreated cells and A s a m p l e is the absorbance of cells treated with samples. All assays were conducted in triplicate, and the experiment was repeated across three independent trials.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The results of the biological studies were analyzed using GraphPad Software 10 (USA). Three independent experiments were conducted, each with internal triplicates, and the values are expressed as mean ± SD. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant differences at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization and Characterization of AuNPs

The rapid formation of AuNPs using an extract of T. ferdinandiana by mixing the extract with an aqueous HAuCl4 solution at room temperature was evidenced by a distinct colour change in the solution from pale yellow to ruby red, indicating the reduction of Au3+ ions to Au0 atoms. The ruby-red colour observed in the aqueous solution is characteristic of AuNPs and is attributed to the excitation of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) vibrations [37].
The results obtained from UV-Vis and dynamic light scattering (DLS) for the synthesis formation of AuNPs with leaf extract (AuKLs) are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.
Figure 1a,b illustrate the effect of pH and the ion-to-extract ratio (w/w) on the formation of AuKLs. The absorption peaks observed in Figure 1a between 523 and 532 nm confirm the formation of AuNPs with the leaf extract. At pH 4, the primary absorption peak for AuKL synthesis was at 532 nm. As the pH increased from 4 to 10, a slight blue shift in the absorption spectra was noted, with the wavelength decreasing from 532 nm to 523 nm. The absorption peaks for pH levels 7 to 9 were nearly identical, appearing around 524 nm. However, at pH 10, the absorption spectra were broader, indicating a wider distribution of particle size. The UV-Vis spectra of AuKLs at different ratios, shown in Figure 1b, indicate an increase in the intensity of the absorption peaks as the amount of T. ferdinandiana leaf extract decreases, up to a Au ion-to-leaf extract ratio of 1:25. At this ratio, the AuKL nanoparticles exhibit a comparatively narrow SPR band centred at 524 nm, with the highest recorded intensity.
Figure 2a,b present three-dimensional plots of the DLS results, illustrating the particle size and PDI across various pH values and ion-to-extract ratios of synthesized AuKLs. These figures demonstrate that larger particle sizes and higher PDI values were obtained when synthesizing AuKLs at acidic pH compared to basic pH. The dark brown regions in both figures correspond to the smallest particle sizes, ranging from 0 to 25 nm, with a PDI between 0.0 and 0.2. The optimal condition for forming stable AuKL nanoparticles is at pH 8, which yielded a particle size of 2.1 nm and a PDI of 0.17.
An increase in particle size and PDI is observed with an increase in the amount of leaf extract added during the synthesis of AuKLs. Furthermore, the analysis of PDI and particle size, as indicated by the dark brown regions in Figure 2a,b, reveals that AuKLs synthesized at a 1:25 ion-to-leaf extract (w/w) ratio achieved the smallest particle size (2.1 nm) and lowest PDI (0.17) values, indicating uniform particle size distribution.
The impact of pH and the ion-to-extract ratio on the formation of AuNPs synthesized using T. ferdinandiana fruit extract (referred to as AuKPs) was different to the leaf extract. The expected colour change from yellow to deep red, indicative of AuNP formation, was not observed for any of the tested pH levels and ratios. Instead, all solutions turned black. The UV-vis spectrum of AuKPs at different pH and different ratios is presented in Figure 3a,b, respectively. The spectra show broader absorption peaks with low intensities, with absorption peaks appearing at longer wavelengths, ranging from 550 nm to 580 nm, which is outside the typical absorption range for AuNPs. DLS analysis revealed that the mean particle size of AuKPs ranged from 140 nm to 200 nm, with a PDI between 0.7 and 1.4. Even though the 1:25 ratio displayed a relatively narrow, higher-intensity peak in the UV-visible spectrum, the DLS results indicated a larger particle size and a PDI greater than 1.0.
Due to the ineffective synthesis of AuNPs using fruit extracts alone, a combination of leaf extracts (KL) and fruit extracts (KP) was utilized to synthesize a new set of AuNPs, termed AuKPLs (gold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture). As the optimal condition for yielding the smallest AuKLs was pH 8 with ion-to-extract ratios of 1:25, AuKPL synthesis was confined to pH 8 and ion-to-extract ratios of 1:25. With these conditions, two different fruit-to-leaf extract ratios, 1:1 and 2:1, were evaluated to test the influence of mixing leaf and fruit extracts. The UV-Vis spectrum in Figure 4a indicates a KP/KL ratio of 1:1, resulting in a narrower absorption band at 523 nm. AuKPL nanoparticles produced at this ratio have a smaller particle size of 35.3 nm and a lower PDI of 0.368 compared to KP/KL—2:1. The UV spectra of the three optimized AuNPs are compared in Figure 4b.
The zeta potential values in Table 1 for the synthesized AuKLs, AuKPs, and AuKPLs at optimal conditions indicate that all samples exhibited a negative surface charge.
TEM analysis revealed that the optimized AuKL and AuKPL nanoparticles were well distributed in solution, with the majority exhibiting spherical or near-spherical morphologies with few triangular shapes, having average diameters of 14.1 ± 5.8 nm and 8.0 ± 3.8 nm, respectively (Figure 5a,c). Both AuKLs and AuKPLs displayed good dispersion in the reaction medium, with no visible signs of agglomeration. In contrast, the TEM image of AuKPs in Figure 5b showed the formation of agglomerated nanoparticles, with larger sizes averaging 56.1 ± 20.7 nm. The hydrodynamic diameters of the AuNPs obtained from DLS analysis were larger than those measured by TEM. This difference arises because DLS measures the hydrodynamic diameter, which includes the phytochemical coating and the surrounding layer of water molecules, whereas TEM provides an accurate measurement of only the inorganic core of the nanoparticles [38,39].

3.2. Biological Activity of AuNPs

As AuNPs did not result in well-formed NPs with fruit extract (AuKPs), this study focused on assessing only the optimized AuKL and AuKPL nanoparticles for their antioxidant and anticancer activities and compared them with the corresponding crude extracts: KL, KP, and KPL (leaf and fruit extract mixture). For comparative analysis, the concentrations of the crude extracts used in all assays were equivalent to the extract levels incorporated into the nanoparticles. This ensured a direct comparison between the bioactivities of the nanoparticles and their respective crude extracts across all tests.
The antioxidant capacities of the T. ferdinandiana extracts and the synthesized AuNPs are presented in Figure 6. Statistical analysis showed that the p values for both the AuNPs and the T. ferdinandiana extracts were below 0.05 (p < 0.001), confirming that the concentration-dependent increases in DPPH radical-scavenging activity were statistically significant. All extracts and AuKPLs exhibited ≥50% radical-scavenging activity at the lowest concentration tested (0.1 mg/mL). Furthermore, all T. ferdinandiana extracts achieved >90% DPPH inhibition at 0.4 mg/mL, whereas the AuKPLs reached ≥90% antioxidant activity from 0.7 mg/mL, while the AuKLs displayed 90% inhibition at concentrations ≥0.5 mg/mL. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the strong in vitro antioxidant potential of the synthesized AuNPs.
The biocompatibility of AuNPs is a crucial determinant influencing their potential in biomedical applications, as cytotoxicity towards normal cells can limit their therapeutic efficacy. In order to address this, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of AuKL, AuKPL, KL, KP, and KPL crude extracts on MCF10A cell lines along with cancer cell lines MCF7 and HeLa. The cytotoxicity of various concentrations of T. ferdinandiana extracts and AuKL and AuKP nanoparticles against MCF7, HeLa cancer cell lines, and MCF10A normal cells is shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7a,b demonstrate that both T. ferdinandiana extracts and the synthesized AuNPs exhibited significant inhibitory effects on the proliferation of MCF7 and HeLa cancer cells. The results showed that the potential growth inhibition of cancer cells increased with the increase in concentration of NPs and extracts. The growth inhibition of MCF7 gradually increased from 62.2% to 84.2% for AuKLs and 56.4% to 83.9% for AuKPLs, with an increase in concentration from 0.16 mg/mL to 5.00 mg/mL. The growth inhibition towards HeLa cells increased from 45.2% to 80.4% for AuKLs and 41.0% to 83.1% for AuKPLs.
Notably, Figure 7a,b showed that the percentage of viable cells treated with extracts was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) compared to those treated with AuKLs and AuKPLs, at equivalent concentrations. The largest difference in growth inhibition between AuNPs and extracts towards MCF7 was shown at a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL (AuKLs showed a 16.2% increase, while AuKPLs showed a 14.1% increase), and the largest difference towards HeLa was shown at a concentration of 5.00 mg/mL (nearly 16% with AuKLs and nearly 26% with AuKPLs). These results clearly indicate that both AuKLs and AuKPLs displayed significantly higher cytotoxicity (p < 0.0001) against MCF7 cells compared to HeLa cells. AuKLs and AuKPLs showed similar inhibitory effects against MCF7 and HeLa cells across all tested concentrations.
Although 25–45% cytotoxicity was observed at higher concentrations (1.25–5.00 mg/mL), at lower concentrations, no significant toxicity was seen on MCF10A normal cells treated with either T. ferdinandiana extracts or the synthesized AuNPs (Figure 7c). The cell viability of MCF10A normal cells was higher than 90% up to a concentration of 0.63 mg/mL of AuKLs and AuKPLs, and gradually decreased to 52% with the increase in concentration until 5.00 mg/mL. These results further confirm the biocompatibility of both the AuKLs and AuKPLs with normal cells.

4. Discussion

Numerous studies have highlighted the presence of various phytochemicals, including tannins, flavonoids, alkaloids, ascorbic acid, and other polyphenolic compounds in solvent extracts from T. ferdinandiana leaves and fruit [33,40,41,42]. Our prior research identified a total of 126 compounds in T. ferdinandiana aqueous extracts using UPLC-MS (both positive and negative ion modes). Notably, ascorbic acid was abundant in the fruit extract, while the leaf extract was rich in a diverse range of tannins, flavonoids, and alkaloids. These findings suggest that a combination of phytochemicals present in T. ferdinandiana aqueous extracts may serve as an effective reducing and stabilizing agent in the conversion of Au3+ to Au0, facilitating the synthesis of AuNPs with enhanced biological properties.
The synthesis process of AuNPs is rapid, as evidenced by the distinct colour change in the solution from pale yellow to ruby red, due to the SPR phenomenon, a hallmark of AuNP formation [43]. Additionally, the UV-Vis spectra of the synthesized T. ferdinandiana-AuNPs showed an absorbance peak between 520 nm and 535 nm, further confirming the formation of AuNPs. This result is consistent with previous studies, such as those by Khandanlou et al. [25,26], demonstrating the effectiveness and reliability of plant extracts in synthesizing AuNPs through green methods.
The size and surface chemistry significantly affect the absorption, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of nanoparticles as drug carriers, making them critical factors in biomedical applications [44]. The pH plays a pivotal role in regulating the reduction of metal ions, the formation of nucleation centres, and the growth of nanoparticles [16]. Previous studies have shown that nanoparticle size decreases with increasing pH [45], as fewer NPs form at lower pH, resulting in larger particles. The UV-visible spectra, PDI, and hydrodynamic diameter results recorded in our study reveal that the pH of the reaction mixture significantly influences both the size and dispersion of AuNPs. The slight blue shift in the UV-visible spectra with the increase in pH indicates the reduction in particle size [46] of AuKLs. This trend aligns with the DLS results (Figure 2a). The formation of larger NPs at lower pH may be due to uncontrolled nucleation and aggregation [47], as well as possible degradation or inactivation of bioactive molecules at acidic conditions [25]. This work demonstrates that a pH of 8 yields small and stable AuKLs with an average size of 21.1 nm and a PDI of 0.17, signifying a well-dispersed distribution. These results are consistent with previous studies, such as those using olive leaf (Olea europaea) extract AuNPs, which also found that larger particles formed at lower pH (3.3) compared to basic conditions (pH 9.6) [48].
The results of this study revealed that different Au ion-to-leaf extract ratios influenced the size and size distribution of AuKLs. The UV-vis spectra in Figure 1b showed that the 1:25 Au3+-to-leaf extract ratio resulted in a narrow absorption peak with the highest intensity, indicating well-defined nanoparticles. These spectral observations were corroborated by DLS measurements with small particle size and low PDI at this ratio. The presence of larger NPs above or below the optimum ratio could be due to insufficient reactant in the mixture leading to uncontrolled nucleation, and aggregation of AuNPs [22].
Despite the well-defined synthesis of AuNPs using T. ferdinandiana leaf extract, AuNPs with fruit extract (AuKPs) turned black instead of ruby red. In the UV-vis spectra, broad absorption peaks with low intensities appeared around 550 nm, indicating the formation of polydisperse (PDI ranging from 0.7 to 1.4) and larger nanoparticles (ranging from 140 nm to 200 nm) under all tested parameters, suggesting that the fruit extract lacks the necessary phytochemicals for capping and stabilizing the nanoparticles. LC-MS results (Table S1) also demonstrated a higher phytochemical content in the leaf extract compared to the fruit extract. Specifically, the leaf extract is rich with phytochemicals with capping and stabilizing abilities, such as amino acids [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56], lignin [57], flavonoids [58,59], polyphenols, and tannins [60,61], which facilitate the synthesis of well-homogenized, stable nanoparticles. In contrast, the fruit extract was deficient in these compounds.
In order to address the lack of capping and stabilizing agents in the fruit extract, combining the leaf extract with the fruit extract resulted in nanoparticles (AuKPLs) with a narrower UV-vis absorption band, smaller particle size, and lower PDI than those obtained with fruit extract alone.
Interestingly, we found that a higher proportion of leaf extract is necessary for the successful formation of AuKPLs compared to AgKPLs in our prior work [12]. More phytochemicals in the fruit extract are required for the reduction of Au3+ ions to Au0, compared to Ag+ to Ag0 reduction.
AuNPs show a negative zeta potential, which indicates effective stabilization. Phytochemicals present in extracts contribute to the formation of a protective layer around the AuNPs, thereby preventing agglomeration and enhancing their stability [25,26,38]. The surface charge of AuNPs also significantly impacts their toxicity and interactions with biological systems. The presence of a negative surface charge in AuNP suspensions not only signifies a high level of stability but also implies a lower level of toxicity towards normal cells and preferential accumulation in tumour cells, whereas positively charged and neutral AuNPs are absorbed by all cell types at the same rate [44,62].
The total T. ferdinandiana leaf and fruit extracts contain various phytochemicals with outstanding antioxidant activities [30,32,63,64,65]. The DPPH assay in this study aimed to determine whether the synthesized AuNPs retained the antioxidant properties of the original T. ferdinandiana extracts [32]. Statistical analysis indicated a significant correlation (p < 0.0001) between DPPH percentage inhibition and the concentrations of both AuNPs and T. ferdinandiana extracts, up to a 90% inhibition threshold. These findings confirm that the synthesized AuNPs effectively retained the antioxidant properties exhibited by the T. ferdinandiana extracts.
Prior studies documented the potent anticancer properties of T. ferdinandiana extracts using different solvents [41,66]. Ramadhania et al. [67] used T. ferdinandiana fruit extract to synthesize ZnO nanoparticles which exhibit significant cytotoxicity against human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells.
In our study, both AuKLs and AuKPLs synthesized with the aqueous extract of T. ferdinandiana exhibited anticancer efficacy against the tested cancer cell lines, higher than that of the crude extracts. AuKLs and AuKPLs exhibited substantial anticancer efficacy against MCF7 breast cancer cells compared to HeLa cancer cells, suggesting their superiority in the treatment of breast cancer cells. Additionally, 0.63 mg/mL is the optimal concentration where AuNPs show the highest cytotoxicity towards both cancer cells while showing the lowest cytotoxicity towards normal cells.
While the anticancer efficacy of biosynthesized AuNPs is complex and not completely understood, biosynthesized AuNPs are regarded as possible vehicles for phytocomponents that possess anticancer properties [26]. T. ferdinandiana AuNPs demonstrated significant cytotoxicity in MCF7 and HeLa cells, likely due to the synergistic effects of biomolecules such as phenols [68], alkaloids [69,70], tannins [71,72,73], and flavonoids [74,75,76] which possess anti-proliferative activities capped on the AuNPs.
AuNPs show shape and size-dependent cytotoxic activity against different cancer cells [77,78,79].
For example, Al-Khedhairy et al. [80] investigated the size-dependent cytotoxicity of AuNPs (size 10–15 nm, 20–10 nm, and 45 nm) on liver cancer cells and found that smaller AuNPs had a more significant cytotoxic effect on HepG2 (human liver cancer) cells. In this study, AuNP synthesis, which shows anticancer properties, also possesses a hydrodynamic size range of 20–30 nm. That may be due to smaller AuNPs exhibiting increased biological and chemical activity and higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, allowing for enhanced macromolecule adsorption and targeted cell interaction through surface functionalization [25]. The cytotoxicity of AuNPs also depends on the dose of nanoparticles [81,82,83]. Khandanlou et al. [25] also reported dose-dependent cytotoxicity of AuNPs synthesized using Backhousia citriodora leaf extract against both MCF7 and HepG2 cancer cells. In our study, AuNPs synthesized with T. ferdinandiana show dose-dependent cytotoxicity.

5. Conclusions

This study represents the first effort to synthesize stable AuNPs from aqueous extracts of T. ferdinandiana and evaluate their cytotoxicity against MCF7 and HeLa cancer cells. The size and distribution of AuNPs were optimized by changing the pH and Au ion-to-extract ratio of the reaction mixture. Following the optimization process, we successfully produced small-sized, well-stabilized and homogenized AuNPs (AuKLs and AuKPLs) at a pH of 8 with a 1:25 Au3+-to-extract (w/w) ratio, utilizing T. ferdinandiana leaves and a combination of leaf and fruit extracts at ambient temperature. AuKLs and AuKPLs exhibited spherical or nearly spherical morphologies, with average dimensions of 21.1 nm and 28.2 nm, respectively. The PDI measurements of 0.17 and 0.37 for AuKLs and AuKPLs indicated the good to moderate dispersity of the synthesized AuNPs. The zeta potential values (−80.1 mV and −73.3 mV for AuKLs and AuKPLs, respectively) confirmed the stability of the AuNPs. The findings demonstrate that the fruit extract alone was inadequate for the formation of AuNPs. Nonetheless, including leaf extract into the fruit at a 1:1 ratio in the reaction mixture stabilized the AuNPs, producing well-dispersed, small nanoparticles. This indicates that the desired AuNPs were successfully synthesized highlighting the essential role of the phytochemicals present in the leaf extract for effective capping and stabilization. Furthermore, these results confirm that the fruit extracts are deficient in the phytochemicals necessary to function as capping and stabilizing agents for AuNP synthesis.
AuKLs and AuKPLs demonstrated significant DPPH free radical scavenging activity; thus, the synthesized AuNPs preserved the antioxidant capabilities of T. ferdinandiana extracts. In vitro anticancer results from this study indicate that the AuKLs and AuKPLs exhibit higher cytotoxicity against MCF7 and HeLa cancer cells, compared to the plant extract. The comparable cytotoxic effects of AuKLs and AuKPLs suggest that the formation of AuNPs in the mixture is primarily driven by the leaf aqueous extract, with minimal contribution from the fruit aqueous extract. This indicates that the phytochemicals in the fruit extract do not interact effectively with the nanoparticles and do not enhance the cytotoxicity of the AuNPs. Furthermore, both AuKLs and AuKPLs exhibit significant cytotoxicity against MCF7 and HeLa cancer cell lines while demonstrating no cytotoxicity effects towards MCF10A, normal breast cancer cells at low concentrations, indicating their potential as anticancer agents in a targeted and safe manner.
As differences were observed in the formation of AuNPs synthesized using T. ferdinandiana leaf and fruit extracts, this variation is likely attributable to the distinct phytochemical profiles of the two extracts. As a subsequent line of investigation, we will examine the specific phytochemicals involved and identify which compounds preferentially interact with and adsorb onto the nanoparticle surfaces.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life15121829/s1. Table S1. LCMS metabolomic profiling of T. ferdinandiana leaf and fruit water extracts in ESI (−) and ESI (+) mode.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.H.S.A., V.M. and R.K.; methodology, W.H.S.A., V.M., H.W., R.K. and R.W.; formal analysis, W.H.S.A.; investigation, W.H.S.A. and R.W.; writing—original draft preparation, W.H.S.A.; writing—review and editing, V.M., H.W. and R.K.; supervision, V.M., H.W. and R.K.; funding acquisition, V.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Training fund from Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory, Australia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory (NT), Australia for financial support. The Central Analytical Research Facility at Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia for the transmission electron microscope facility, and the Berrimah Veterinary Laboratory, NT, Australia for anticancer study. Deep Jyoti Bhuyan and Indeewarie Dissanayake at NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia, for providing the MCF10A normal cell line. Penny Wurm for assistance in T. ferdinandiana specimen preparation. Jeremy Garnett of Top End Editing for assistance with proofreading and formatting.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
A549Human lung adenocarcinoma
AgSilver
AgKLSilver nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract
AgKPSilver nanoparticles synthesized with fruit extract
AgKPLSilver nanoparticles synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture
ANOVAAnalysis of variance
AuGold
Au3+Metallic gold ions
AuKLGold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract
AuKPGold nanoparticles synthesized with fruit extract
AuKPLGold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture
AuNPGold nanoparticles
CDUCharles Darwin University
CO2Carbon dioxide
DLSDynamic light scattering
DMSODimethyl sulfoxide
DPPH2,2 diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
FBSFetal bovine serum
GA-1000Gentamicin-amphotericin
HAuCl4Chloroauric acid 
HeLaHuman cervical carcinoma
HepG2Human liver cancer cell line
HPWHigh-purity water
KLLeaf extract
KPFruit extract
KPLLeaf and fruit extract mixture
LC-MSLiquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy
MCF7Breast cancer cell line
MCF10ANormal mammalian breast cell line
MEBM Mammary epithelial cell growth basal medium
MEM Minimum Eagle’s medium
MTT3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
NPNanoparticles
NSWNew South Wales
NTNorthern Territory
ODOptical density
PBSPhosphate-buffered saline
PDIPolydispersity index
QldQueensland
QUTQueensland University of Technology
RPMIRoswell Park Memorial Institute
SDStandard deviation
SPRSurface plasmon resonance
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
UPLC-MSUltra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
USAUnited States of America
UVUltraviolet
UV-visVisible ultraviolet

References

  1. Habeeb Rahuman, H.B.; Dhandapani, R.; Narayanan, S.; Palanivel, V.; Paramasivam, R.; Subbarayalu, R.; Thangavelu, S.; Muthupandian, S. Medicinal plants mediated the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 16, 115–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bano, A.; Dawood, A.; Rida; Saira, F.; Malik, A.; Alkholief, M.; Ahmad, H.; Khan, M.A.; Ahmad, Z.; Bazighifan, O. Enhancing catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles in a standard redox reaction by investigating the impact of AuNPs size, temperature and reductant concentrations. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 12359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kumari, S.; Panda, P.K.; Pramanik, N.; Verma, S.K.; Mallick, M.A. Molecular aspect of phytofabrication of gold nanoparticle from Andrographis peniculata photosystem II and their in vivo biological effect on embryonic zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2019, 11, 100201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Duan, X.; He, C.; Kron, S.J.; Lin, W. Nanoparticle formulations of cisplatin for cancer therapy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 8, 776–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patra, H.K.; Dasgupta, A.K.; Sarkar, S.; Biswas, I.; Chattopadhyay, A. Dual role of nanoparticles as drug carrier and drug. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rossi, A.; Donati, S.; Fontana, L.; Porcaro, F.; Battocchio, C.; Proietti, E.; Venditti, I.; Bracci, L.; Fratoddi, I. Negatively charged gold nanoparticles as a dexamethasone carrier: Stability in biological media and bioactivity assessment in vitro. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 99016–99022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agarwalla, P.; Mukherjee, S.; Sreedhar, B.; Banerjee, R. Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated delivery of nano gold–with aferin conjugates for reversal of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumor regression. Nanomedicine 2016, 11, 2529–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patel, H.; Li, J.; Bo, L.; Mehta, R.; Ashby, C.R.; Wang, S.; Cai, W.; Chen, Z.-S. Nanotechnology-based delivery systems to overcome drug resistance in cancer. Med. Rev. 2024, 4, 5–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faid, A.H.; Shouman, S.A.; Badr, Y.A.; Sharaky, M. Enhanced cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin conjugated gold nanoparticles on breast cancer model. BMC Chem. 2022, 16, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goddard, Z.R.; Marín, M.J.; Russell, D.A.; Searcey, M. Active targeting of gold nanoparticles as cancer therapeutics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 8774–8789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iglesias, E. Gold Nanoparticles as Colorimetric Sensors for the Detection of DNA Bases and Related Compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alwis, W.H.S.; Murthy, V.; Wang, H.; Khandanlou, R.; Mandal, P.K. Green synthesis of Terminalia ferdinandiana Exell-mediated silver nanoparticles and evaluation of antibacterial performance. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iravani, S. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Menon, S.; Rajeshkumar, S.; Kumar, V. A review on biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles, characterization, and its applications. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2017, 3, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahmed, S.; Ahmad, M.; Swami, B.L.; Ikram, S. A review on plants extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: A green expertise. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hosseingholian, A.; Gohari, S.D.; Feirahi, F.; Moammeri, F.; Mesbahian, G.; Moghaddam, Z.S.; Ren, Q. Recent advances in green synthesized nanoparticles: From production to application. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 24, 100500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siddiqi, K.S.; Husen, A. Recent advances in plant-mediated engineered gold nanoparticles and their application in biological system. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017, 40, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mittal, A.K.; Chisti, Y.; Banerjee, U.C. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, Y.J.; Park, Y. Green Synthetic Nanoarchitectonics of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Prepared Using Quercetin and Their Cytotoxicity and Catalytic Applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 2781–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Somasundaram, K.; Santhanalakshmi, J.; Viswanathan, B.; Johnpaul, M.; Srinivasan, K. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Citrus sinensis Peel Extract and Its Antibacterial Activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 79, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Barai, A.C.; Paul, K.; Dey, A.; Manna, S.; Roy, S.; Bag, B.G.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Green synthesis of Nerium oleander-conjugated gold nanoparticles and study of its in vitro anticancer activity on MCF-7 cell lines and catalytic activity. Nano Converg. 2018, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fatima, Z.; Saleem, R.; Khan, R.R.M.; Liaqat, M.; Pervaiz, M.; Saeed, Z.; Muhammad, G.; Amin, M.; Rasheed, S. Green synthesis, properties, and biomedical potential of gold nanoparticles: A comprehensive review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 59, 103271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kajani, A.A.; Bordbar, A.-K.; Zarkesh Esfahani, S.H.; Razmjou, A. Gold nanoparticles as potent anticancer agent: Green synthesis, characterization, and in vitro study. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 63973–63983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Radadi, N.S. Green Biosynthesis of Flaxseed Gold Nanoparticles (Au-NPs) as Potent Anti-cancer Agent Against Breast Cancer Cells. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2021, 25, 101243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khandanlou, R.; Murthy, V.; Saranath, D.; Damani, H. Synthesis and characterization of gold-conjugated Backhousia citriodora nanoparticles and their anticancer activity against MCF-7 breast and HepG2 liver cancer cell lines. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 3106–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khandanlou, R.; Murthy, V.; Wang, H. Gold nanoparticle-assisted enhancement in bioactive properties of Australian native plant extracts, Tasmannia lanceolata and Backhousia citriodora. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 112, 110922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rajeshkumar, S. Anticancer activity of eco-friendly gold nanoparticles against lung and liver cancer cells. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2016, 14, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gorman, J.; Wurm, P.; Vemuri, R.; Brady, C.; Sultanbawa, Y. Kakadu Plum (Terminalia ferdinandiana) as a Sustainable Indigenous Agribusiness. Econ. Bot. 2019, 74, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prema, P.; Boobalan, T.; Arun, A.; Rameshkumar, K.; Suresh Babu, R.; Veeramanikandan, V.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Balaji, P. Green tea extract mediated biogenic synthesis of gold nanoparticles with potent anti-proliferative effect against PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. Mater. Lett. 2022, 306, 130882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akter, S.; Netzel, M.E.; Tinggi, U.; Osborne, S.A.; Fletcher, M.T.; Sultanbawa, Y. Antioxidant rich extracts of Terminalia ferdinandiana inhibit the growth of foodborne bacteria. Foods 2019, 8, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cock, I.E.; Mohanty, S. Evaluation of the antibacterial activity and toxicity of Terminalia ferdinandia fruit extracts. Pharmacogn. J. 2011, 3, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Konczak, I.; Zabaras, D.; Dunstan, M.; Aguas, P. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic compounds in commercially grown native Australian fruits. Food Chem. 2010, 123, 1048–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Courtney, R.; Sirdaarta, J.; Matthews, B.; Cock, I. Tannin components and inhibitory activity of Kakadu plum leaf extracts against microbial triggers of autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Pharmacogn. J. 2014, 7, 18–31. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dissanayake, I.H.; Alsherbiny, M.A.; Chang, D.; Li, C.G.; Bhuyan, D.J. Antiproliferative effects of Australian native plums against the MCF7 breast adenocarcinoma cells and UPLC-qTOF-IM-MS-driven identification of key metabolites. Food Biosci. 2023, 54, 102864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al Mashud, M.A.; Moinuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.S.; Ahmed, S.; Ahsan, G.; Reza, A.; Anwar Ratul, R.B.; Uddin, M.H.; Momin, M.A.; Hena Mostofa Jamal, M.A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cinnamomum tamala (Tejpata) leaf and their potential application to control multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from hospital drainage water. Heliyon 2022, 8, e09920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Saki, E.; Murthy, V.; Khandanlou, R.; Wang, H.; Wapling, J.; Weir, R. Optimisation of Calophyllum inophyllum seed oil nanoemulsion as a potential wound healing agent. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2022, 22, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Link, S.; El-Sayed, M.A. Shape and size dependence of radiative, non-radiative and photothermal properties of gold nanocrystals. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2000, 19, 409–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vemuri, S.K.; Banala, R.R.; Mukherjee, S.; Uppula, P.; Gpv, S.; AV, G.R. Novel biosynthesized gold nanoparticles as anti-cancer agents against breast cancer: Synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular modelling studies. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 99, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mi, X.J.; Park, H.R.; Dhandapani, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, Y.J. Biologically synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Cirsium japonicum var. maackii extract and the study of anti-cancer properties on AGS gastric cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 5809–5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sirdaarta, J.; Matthews, B.; White, A.; Cock, I.E. GC-MS and LC-MS analysis of Kakadu plum fruit extracts displaying inhibitory activity against microbial triggers of multiple sclerosis. Pharmacogn. Commun. 2015, 5, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sirdaarta, J. Phytochemical study and anticancer potential of high antioxidant Australian native plants. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University, Brisbane City, Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sirdaarta, J.; Matthews, B.; Cock, I.E. Kakadu plum fruit extracts inhibit growth of the bacterial triggers of rheumatoid arthritis: Identification of stilbene and tannin components. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 17, 610–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zeng, S.; Yu, X.; Law, W.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, R.; Dinh, X.-Q.; Ho, H.-P.; Yong, K.-T. Size dependence of Au NP-enhanced surface plasmon resonance based on differential phase measurement. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, H.; Liu, G.; Zeng, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, C.; Mei, L.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L. Fabrication of genistein-loaded biodegradable TPGS-b-PCL nanoparticles for improved therapeutic effects in cervical cancer cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 2461–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Okitsu, K.; Sharyo, K.; Nishimura, R. One-pot synthesis of gold nanorods by ultrasonic irradiation: The effect of pH on the shape of the gold nanorods and nanoparticles. Langmuir 2009, 25, 7786–7790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsekov, R.; Georgiev, P.; Simeonova, S.; Balashev, K. Quantifying the Blue Shift in the Light Absorption of Small Gold Nanoparticles. Comptes Rendus l’Académie Bulg. Sci. Sci. Mathématiques Nat. 2017, 70, 1237. [Google Scholar]
  47. Shankar, S.S.; Rai, A.; Ahmad, A.; Sastry, M. Rapid synthesis of Au, Ag, and bimetallic Au core–Ag shell nanoparticles using Neem (Azadirachta indica) leaf broth. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2004, 275, 496–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khalil, M.M.H.; Ismail, E.H.; El-Magdoub, F. Biosynthesis of Au nanoparticles using olive leaf extract: 1st Nano Updates. Arab. J. Chem. 2012, 5, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Oćwieja, M.; Morga, M. Electrokinetic properties of cysteine-stabilized silver nanoparticles dispersed in suspensions and deposited on solid surfaces in the form of monolayers. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 297, 1000–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Figat, A.M.; Bartosewicz, B.; Liszewska, M.; Budner, B.; Norek, M.; Jankiewicz, B.J. α-Amino Acids as Reducing and Capping Agents in Gold Nanoparticles Synthesis Using the Turkevich Method. Langmuir 2023, 39, 8646–8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nayak, N.C.; Shin, K. Synthesis of L-phenylalanine stabilized gold nanoparticles and their thermal stability. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 3512–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akbarzadeh, A.; Zare, D.; Farhangi, A.; Mehrabi, M.R.; Norouzian, D.; Tangestaninejad, S.; Moghadam, M.; Bararpour, N. Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles by Tryptophane. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2009, 6, 691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Laban, B.; Ralević, U.; Petrović, S.; Leskovac, A.; Vasić-Anićijević, D.; Marković, M.; Vasić, V. Green synthesis and characterization of nontoxic L-methionine capped silver and gold nanoparticles. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 204, 110958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mu, X.; Qi, L.; Dong, P.; Qiao, J.; Hou, J.; Nie, Z.; Ma, H. Facile one-pot synthesis of L-proline-stabilized fluorescent gold nanoclusters and its application as sensing probes for serum iron. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 49, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shankar, S.; Rhim, J.W. Amino acid mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and preparation of antimicrobial agar/silver nanoparticles composite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 130, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shumi, G.; Demissie, T.B.; Eswaramoorthy, R.; Bogale, R.F.; Kenasa, G.; Desalegn, T. Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Functionalized with Histidine and Phenylalanine Amino Acids for Potential Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 24371–24386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ito, N.M.; Mendes Filho, A.d.A.; dos Santos, D.J.; dos Santos, L.T. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using modified lignin as a reducing agent. Next Mater. 2024, 2, 100101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jain, S.; Mehata, M.S. Medicinal Plant Leaf Extract and Pure Flavonoid Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and their Enhanced Antibacterial Property. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sathishkumar, P.; Gu, F.L.; Zhan, Q.; Palvannan, T.; Mohd Yusoff, A.R. Flavonoids mediated ‘Green’ nanomaterials: A novel nanomedicine system to treat various diseases—Current trends and future perspective. Mater. Lett. 2018, 210, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gibała, A.; Żeliszewska, P.; Gosiewski, T.; Krawczyk, A.; Duraczyńska, D.; Szaleniec, J.; Szaleniec, M.; Oćwieja, M. Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Silver Nanoparticles-Effect of a Surface-Stabilizing Agent. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Barnaby, S.N.; Yu, S.M.; Fath, K.R.; Tsiola, A.; Khalpari, O.; Banerjee, I.A. Ellagic acid promoted biomimetic synthesis of shape-controlled silver nanochains. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 225605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jia, Y.-P.; Ma, B.-Y.; Wei, X.-W.; Qian, Z.-Y. The in vitro and in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2017, 28, 691–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Netzel, M.; Netzel, G.; Tian, Q.; Schwartz, S.; Konczak, I. Native Australian fruits—A novel source of antioxidants for food. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2007, 8, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Konczak, I.; Maillot, F.; Dalar, A. Phytochemical divergence in 45 accessions of Terminalia ferdinandiana (Kakadu plum). Food Chem. 2014, 151, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tan, A.C.; Konczak, I.; Ramzan, I.; Zabaras, D.; Sze, D.M.Y. Potential Antioxidant, Antiinflammatory, and Proapoptotic Anticancer Activities of Kakadu Plum and Illawarra Plum Polyphenolic Fractions. Nutr. Cancer 2011, 63, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shalom, J.; Rayan, P.; Courtney, R.; McDonnell, P.A.; Cock, I.E. Terminalia ferdinandiana Exell. Kino Extracts have Anti-Giardial Activity and Inhibit CaCO2 and HeLa Cancer Cell Proliferation. Pharmacogn. Commun. 2018, 8, 60-65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ramadhania, Z.M.; Nahar, J.; Ahn, J.C.; Yang, D.U.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, D.W.; Kong, B.M.; Mathiyalagan, R.; Rupa, E.J.; Akter, R.; et al. Terminalia ferdinandiana (Kakadu Plum)-Mediated Bio-Synthesized ZnO Nanoparticles for Enhancement of Anti-Lung Cancer and Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wahle, K.W.; Brown, I.; Rotondo, D.; Heys, S.D. Plant phenolics in the prevention and treatment of cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 698, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mondal, A.; Gandhi, A.; Fimognari, C.; Atanasov, A.G.; Bishayee, A. Alkaloids for cancer prevention and therapy: Current progress and future perspectives. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 858, 172472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Olofinsan, K.; Abrahamse, H.; George, B.P. Therapeutic role of alkaloids and alkaloid derivatives in cancer management. Molecules 2023, 28, 5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Boukharta, M.; Jalbert, G.; Castonguay, A. Biodistribution of ellagic acid and dose-related inhibition of lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice. Nutr. Cancer 1992, 18, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Duan, J.; Li, Y.; Gao, H.; Yang, D.; He, X.; Fang, Y.; Zhou, G. Phenolic compound ellagic acid inhibits mitochondrial respiration and tumor growth in lung cancer. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 6332–6339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rezaei-Seresht, H.; Cheshomi, H.; Falanji, F.; Movahedi-Motlagh, F.; Hashemian, M.; Mireskandari, E. Cytotoxic activity of caffeic acid and gallic acid against MCF-7 human breast cancer cells: An in silico and in vitro study. Avicenna J. Phytomedicine 2019, 9, 574–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Singh, S.; Verma, R. Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Flavonoids in the Management of Cancer. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2024, 26, 17–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tavsan, Z.; Kayali, H.A. Flavonoids showed anticancer effects on the ovarian cancer cells: Involvement of reactive oxygen species, apoptosis, cell cycle and invasion. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 116, 109004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kopustinskiene, D.M.; Jakstas, V.; Savickas, A.; Bernatoniene, J. Flavonoids as Anticancer Agentvs. Nutrients 2020, 12, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pan, Y.; Neuss, S.; Leifert, A.; Fischler, M.; Wen, F.; Simon, U.; Schmid, G.; Brandau, W.; Jahnen-Dechent, W. Size-Dependent Cytotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles. Small 2007, 3, 1941–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Cui, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Rong, H.; Lu, W.; Jiang, L. Effects of aggregation and the surface properties of gold nanoparticles on cytotoxicity and cell growth. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012, 8, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xie, X.; Liao, J.; Shao, X.; Li, Q.; Lin, Y. The Effect of shape on Cellular Uptake of Gold Nanoparticles in the forms of Stars, Rods, and Triangles. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Al-Khedhairy, A.A.; Wahab, R. Size-dependent cytotoxic and molecular study of the use of gold nanoparticles against liver cancer cells. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Raghunandan, D.; Ravishankar, B.; Sharanbasava, G.; Mahesh, D.B.; Harsoor, V.; Yalagatti, M.S.; Bhagawanraju, M.; Venkataraman, A. Anti-cancer studies of noble metal nanoparticles synthesized using different plant extracts. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Patil, M.P.; Ngabire, D.; Thi, H.H.P.; Kim, M.-D.; Kim, G.-D. Eco-friendly Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Evaluation of Their Cytotoxic Activity on Cancer Cells. J. Clust. Sci. 2017, 28, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Chuang, S.-M.; Lee, Y.-H.; Liang, R.-Y.; Roam, G.-D.; Zeng, Z.-M.; Tu, H.-F.; Wang, S.-K.; Chueh, P.J. Extensive evaluations of the cytotoxic effects of gold nanoparticles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 4960–4973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ultraviolet-visible spectra of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKL) at (a) different pH values, and (b) different ratios of Au3+/leaf extract (w/w) at pH 8.
Figure 1. Ultraviolet-visible spectra of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKL) at (a) different pH values, and (b) different ratios of Au3+/leaf extract (w/w) at pH 8.
Life 15 01829 g001
Figure 2. (a) Average particle size (nm) of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs) at different pH values and different Au3+/leaf extract ratios (w/w). (b) Polydispersity index of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs) at different pH values and different Au3+/leaf extract ratios (w/w).
Figure 2. (a) Average particle size (nm) of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs) at different pH values and different Au3+/leaf extract ratios (w/w). (b) Polydispersity index of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs) at different pH values and different Au3+/leaf extract ratios (w/w).
Life 15 01829 g002aLife 15 01829 g002b
Figure 3. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with fruit extract (AuKPs) at (a) different pH values and (b) different ratios of Au3+/fruit extract (w/w) at pH 8.
Figure 3. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum of gold nanoparticles (Au) synthesized with fruit extract (AuKPs) at (a) different pH values and (b) different ratios of Au3+/fruit extract (w/w) at pH 8.
Life 15 01829 g003
Figure 4. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum of (a) gold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract (KL) and fruit extract (KP) mixture (AuKPLs) at different KP/KL extract ratios at pH 8; (b) optimized gold nanoparticles prepared at pH 8.
Figure 4. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrum of (a) gold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract (KL) and fruit extract (KP) mixture (AuKPLs) at different KP/KL extract ratios at pH 8; (b) optimized gold nanoparticles prepared at pH 8.
Life 15 01829 g004
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs), (b) AuNPs synthesized with plum extract (AuKPs), and (c) AuNPs synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture (AuKPLs), synthesized from Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts.
Figure 5. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized with leaf extract (AuKLs), (b) AuNPs synthesized with plum extract (AuKPs), and (c) AuNPs synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture (AuKPLs), synthesized from Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts.
Life 15 01829 g005
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity of Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts and synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Results are presented as mean ± SD. AuKL: AuNPs synthesized with leaf extract; AuKPL: Gold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract (KL) and fruit extract (KP) mixture (KPL).
Figure 6. Antioxidant activity of Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts and synthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Results are presented as mean ± SD. AuKL: AuNPs synthesized with leaf extract; AuKPL: Gold nanoparticles synthesized with leaf extract (KL) and fruit extract (KP) mixture (KPL).
Life 15 01829 g006
Figure 7. Cytotoxic effect of Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts, AuKLs (gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized with leaf extract (KL)), and AuKPLs (AuNPs synthesized with leaf and fruit extract) on (a) HeLa (human cervical carcinoma), (b) MCF7 (breast cancer), and (c) MCF10A (normal mammalian breast) cells by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 10. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of three technical replicates from each of three independent trials.
Figure 7. Cytotoxic effect of Terminalia ferdinandiana extracts, AuKLs (gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) synthesized with leaf extract (KL)), and AuKPLs (AuNPs synthesized with leaf and fruit extract) on (a) HeLa (human cervical carcinoma), (b) MCF7 (breast cancer), and (c) MCF10A (normal mammalian breast) cells by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA in GraphPad Prism 10. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of three technical replicates from each of three independent trials.
Life 15 01829 g007
Table 1. Zeta-potential, polydispersity index (PDI) value, and hydrodynamic diameter of optimized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
Table 1. Zeta-potential, polydispersity index (PDI) value, and hydrodynamic diameter of optimized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
AuNPsZeta Potential (mV)PDIHydrodynamic Diameter (nm)
AuKL s−80.10.1721.1
AuKPs−71.80.70144
AuKPLs−73.30.3728.2
AuKLs: Gold nanoparticles (NPs) synthesized with leaf extract; AuKPs: Gold nanoparticles synthesized with fruit extract; AuKPLs: AuNPs synthesized with leaf and fruit extract mixture; AuNPs: Gold nanoparticles.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alwis, W.H.S.; Murthy, V.; Wang, H.; Khandanlou, R.; Weir, R. Biofabrication of Terminalia ferdinandiana-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Properties. Life 2025, 15, 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15121829

AMA Style

Alwis WHS, Murthy V, Wang H, Khandanlou R, Weir R. Biofabrication of Terminalia ferdinandiana-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Properties. Life. 2025; 15(12):1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15121829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alwis, Weerakkodige Hansi Sachintha, Vinuthaa Murthy, Hao Wang, Roshanak Khandanlou, and Richard Weir. 2025. "Biofabrication of Terminalia ferdinandiana-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Properties" Life 15, no. 12: 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15121829

APA Style

Alwis, W. H. S., Murthy, V., Wang, H., Khandanlou, R., & Weir, R. (2025). Biofabrication of Terminalia ferdinandiana-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles and Their Anticancer Properties. Life, 15(12), 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15121829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop