Next Article in Journal
Model-Based Manipulation of Linear Flexible Objects: Task Automation in Simulation and Real World
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Strategy of Speed Predictive Control for Nonlinear Synchronous Reluctance Motors
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Rehabilitation Machine for Bariatric Individuals

by Andrea Botta *, Paride Cavallone, Luca Carbonari, Carmen Visconte and Giuseppe Quaglia
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 8 July 2020 / Revised: 5 August 2020 / Accepted: 6 August 2020 / Published: 7 August 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper presented the design, developpement and control of a rehabilitation machine for bariatric individuals. The main contribution of the authors is the developpment of the prototype device focusing on the leg and Upper body exercises mechanism and its control system based on PID law.

The issue investigated is important in health applications. In general, the paper is not well organized about writing and notation. Some parts are difficult to understand since it summarizes different parts on modeling or design without clear methodology.

All rehabilitation devices are controlled by classical control laws. Although the results obtained with these controllers are satisfying in terms of rehabilitation
specifications, they are restrictive in terms of control performance, mainly because they do not theoretically guarantee good behaviour in the entire state space and do not ensure the users safety.


My decision is thus for "Revise and re-submit".

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Well done for writing this interesting paper. Kindly find the following comments to improve your paper:

Abstract should be rewritten to reflect the purpose of the paper and the new approach presented. Current Abstract looks like a part of the Introduction Section.

Include more recent academic studies and update references since many references used are more than 10 years old.

Can you please highlight how this system could improve over existing systems.

Can you please conclude what are the anticipated outcomes from using this system.

To meet safety concerns, I suggest more improvement and optimisation to take place before clinical trials.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

 

Well done for improving your paper. I will recommend it to the editorial board. 

 

 

Back to TopTop