Pilot-Scale Investigation of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering by Decanter Centrifuge—Part 1: Process Performance and Fine Particle Recovery
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Solid–Liquid Separation
1.2. Separation Theory: Governing Principles for Fine Tailings
1.2.1. Sedimentation and Settling Theory
- Stokes’ Law Limitations: Traditional models of settling velocity, such as those derived from Stokes’ law, rely on the assumption of single-particle settling in a laminar flow regime [17,19,21]. However, the high solid content in mineral slurries means that the assumption of single-particle settling is often insufficient, leading to deviations from experimental data [19].
- Kynch Theory: The Kynch theory is a highly significant tool in sedimentation studies [20,22]. This theory distinguishes the following four zones during batch sedimentation tests: clear water, initial concentration, a variable concentration (transition phase), and a compression bed [11,23]. However, the flocculation and segregation behaviors observed in tailings, which contain a wide particle size distribution (PSD), often preclude the direct application of classical Kynch theory, especially since continuous segregation can modify the solid concentration and PSD of the settling zone over time [22,24].
1.2.2. Compressional Rheology and Dewatering Limits
- Reductions in particle size significantly influence the equilibrium extent of dewatering [25]. For instance, an ultra-fine calcium carbonate suspension achieved equilibrium at a lower solid volume fraction than a coarser mixture under the same pressure [25]. This observation underscores the challenge of achieving low moisture levels in ultrafine tailings [25].
- The gel point marks the critical solid volume fraction where particles form a continuous, space-filling, and stress-bearing supportive structure [25]. For mineral tailings with fine particles, net attractive interparticle potential often results in a continuous particulate network at lower packing fractions, which resists consolidation [25]. Achieving higher solid concentration in these fine systems can prove challenging, even with high-pressure dewatering [25]. The goal of mechanical dewatering is to reach the dryness limit, which represents the theoretical water content limit that can be removed by mechanical means [26,27].
1.3. Role of Rheology in Dewatering Selection
- Shear vs. Compressive Yield Stress: Experimental analysis comparing shear and compressive rheology showed that the shear yield stress was consistently two to three orders of magnitude lower than the compressive yield stress, irrespective of the ultra-fine fraction [25]. This suggests that incorporating shear alongside pressure application has the potential to enhance the dewatering process, a strategy explored in devices like High-Pressure Dewatering Rolls [25,29,30].
- Operational Control: The viscosity of the tailing fluid determines the particle settling rate [11]. Viscosity measurements are critical for understanding how operational variables, such as temperature and solid concentration, affect water release from bauxite slurry; for instance, increasing temperature generally reduces viscosity, which aids dewatering [16,31,32].
1.4. Separation Methods Suitable for Bauxite Tailings
1.4.1. Gravitational Sedimentation
- High-Rate/Paste Thickeners: High-rate thickeners use high cylindrical tanks and steeper cones to produce higher pressure on settled particles, leading to denser underflow, often targeting a paste range of solids by mass [11,25,33]. The alumina industry commonly uses paste thickening as one of the most effective dewatering methods, followed by spreading the material for drying purposes before layering it in the environment [28,34].
1.4.2. Filtration
- Pressure Filtration: In various cases, high-pressure filtration devices, such as filter presses, are necessary to achieve the high solid concentrations required for filtered tailings (dry stacking) [11,13,25]. Dry stacking facilities have been successfully implemented using plate and frame filter presses for applications where over 50% of the material is finer than 0.015 mm [13]. Despite its benefits, high-pressure filtration is a relatively high-cost option, both in terms of capital and maintenance costs. Producing a filter cake with sufficiently low moisture content can be challenging when processing ultra-fine slurries with high-pressure filters [13,25].
1.4.3. Centrifugal Dewatering
1.5. Decanter Centrifuge
1.5.1. Equipment Description and Operational Principle
Basic Structure
Separation Mechanism
1.5.2. Sizing, Design, and Scaling Factors
Key Structural and Operational Parameters
- Screw Pitch and Cone Angle: The interaction between the drum’s half cone angle and the screw pitch significantly affects solid recovery [36]. A moderate half-cone angle enhances centrifugal force, while an excessively large angle can cause flow field disturbance and reduce recovery [36]. Increasing the screw pitch initially promotes particle flow, but if too large, it increases liquid flow rate, possibly causing particle re-suspension [36].
Sizing and Scale-Up
- Scaling Theory: Scale-up is ideally carried out between geometrically similar decanters [21]. Historically, the Σ-theory [46] simplified sedimentation based on Stokes’ law to estimate capacity, but this approach often leads to deviations from experimental data, as it neglects high solid content and complex flow conditions [17,19].
- G-Volume Approach: This widely used scaling method maintains the ratio of the clarification volume and the G-force constant relative to the volume flow during scale-up [18].
1.5.3. Advanced Modeling and Optimization
Modeling Techniques
- Dynamic Simulation Models: These physically based models predict unsteady behavior such as startup and shutdown, by coupling three simultaneous processes: settling, cake consolidation, and sediment transport [18,19]. These models use material functions derived from lab-scale tests to describe hindered settling and consolidation [18,19].
- CFD and Multiphase Modeling: Computational Fluid Dynamics—CFD is used for simulating the complex 3D internal flow field, which is difficult to monitor experimentally [36,42].
- ○
- ○
- ○
Integrated Optimization
- RSM and MOGA: The combination of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) is applied to structural optimization [36]. RSM builds models relating structural variables (e.g., drum half cone angle, screw pitch) to objectives, and MOGA finds the optimal balance between maximizing solid recovery and minimizing overflow solid content, leading to substantial performance enhancements [36].
1.6. Objectives
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Pilot Plant Setup
- Crushing carried out in a sizer-type crusher, manufactured by Haver & Boecker model HB-10080X (Monte Mor, Brazil), 37 kW power operating at 40 mm aperture.
- Disaggregation conducted at a slurry chute equipped with a high-pressure jet technology to separate clay particles from the bauxite particles.
- Screening carried out at a 0.8 m in width and 1.5 m in length screen manufactured by Haver & Boecker model XL-CLASS ME (Monte Mor, Brazil), equipped with a 1 mm metallic aperture mesh.
- Dewatering stage executed in a decanter centrifuge.
- Centrifuge feed slurry at the pump outlet.
- Centrifuge cake—dewatered tailings.
- Centrate—clarified liquid.
2.2. Mineral Characterization
- Rheological characterization—carried out using an Anton Paar rotational rheometer (Graz, Austria), model MCR 92, equipped with a Mooney–Ewart-type geometry. Prior to the measurements, 200 mL of bauxite tailing slurry, prepared under tested conditions, was homogenized for 5 min using a mechanical stirrer operating at 500–600 rpm. Subsequently, 18 mL of the slurry was transferred to the measurement cup for rheological testing at 25 ± 0.2 °C. A pre-shear step at 700 s−1 for 1 min was applied to ensure that the particles were homogeneously suspended. Tests were then conducted, in duplicate, over the shear rate range of 0.1 700 s−1 (ramp down).
- Specific Gravity determination—determined by helium gas pycnometry using a Micromeritics AccuPyc II 1340 (Micromeritics Instrument Corp, Norcross, GA, USA). Samples were dried for 12 h at 100 °C prior to analysis, which was conducted on the “as collected” granulometry with 10 purge cycles.
- Particle size distribution analysis—determined by laser diffraction using a Malvern Mastersizer 2000 equipped with a Hydro 2000MU (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) dispersion unit. The analysis was carried out in deionized water (refractive index 1.33) with a pump speed of 2500 rpm and 1 min of ultrasonic treatment to ensure full particle dispersion. A refractive index of 1.76 was applied for the solid phase.
2.3. Quantitative Characterization of Classification Efficiency
3. Results
3.1. Technological Characterization
3.1.1. Rheology
3.1.2. Specific Gravity
3.1.3. Particle Size Distribution
3.2. G-Force Calculation and Operational Parameters
3.3. Solid and Water Recovery
3.4. Effect of Rotational Speed on Performance
- Dewatering Efficiency: A clear linear relationship was observed between bowl speed and the cake water dilution or final cake dryness (Figure 5b). Increasing the speed from 1600 rpm (888 G) to 1800 rpm (1124 G) significantly improved the cake solid content from 66.30% to 71.50% by weight.
- Overall Solid Recovery: Average cake mass recovery (Figure 5a) also showed a strong positive linear trend (R2 = 0.9946), increasing from 40.03% at 1600 rpm to 56.22% at 1800 rpm.
- Coarse Fraction: As shown in Figure 5c, recovery of particles coarser than 20 µm was near-total under all conditions, increasing slightly from 98.2% to 99.1% with bowl rotation speed (R2 = 0.9988). This indicates the centrifuge is highly effective at capturing almost all particles coarser than 20 µm.
- Fine Fraction: Figure 5d shows that the majority of particles finer than 20 µm were directed to the centrate, therefore contributing to the obtained overall mass recovery. Accordingly, the mass recovery of fine particles to the cake product was much smaller, ranging from only 22.0% to 35.1%. This parameter also showed a monotonic increase within the tested range with speed (R2 = 0.9848), confirming that the applied G-force is the critical factor in capturing these ultra-fine particles.
3.5. Separation Efficiency by Particle Size—Partition Curves
3.6. Quantitative Partition Modeling Using the Whiten Equation
4. Discussion
4.1. Influence of Bowl Speed on Mechanical Separation Performance
4.2. Fine Particle Recovery and the Role of Rheology
- Reduction in mechanical cut size (enhanced centrifugal classification);
- Increased hydraulic transport of ultrafine particles (higher bypass).
4.3. Industrial Implications and Optimization Strategy
- Control of feed solid concentration and rheology;
- Adjustment of differential speed and pool depth;
- Potential use of flocculation or pre-conditioning to reduce ultrafine mobility.
5. Conclusions
- Material Characterization: The bauxite tailings slurry is a challenging, non-Newtonian material. It exhibits strong yield-pseudoplastic behavior with a high yield stress (7.5–22.2 Pa), characteristic of concentrated, cohesive clay suspensions. This rheological response significantly influences internal flow dynamics and constrains size-selective separation in the ultrafine regime.
- Performance on Cake Moisture: The decanter centrifuge is a mechanically adequate piece of equipment for dewatering bauxite tailings, producing cake ranging from 66.3% to 71.5% solids, respectively obtained at 1600 rpm (888 G) to 1800 rpm (1124 G). This confirms the technology’s potential to generate a high-solid product suitable for further deposition.
- Influence of Bowl Speed: Bowl rotational speed was identified as the dominant operational parameter. Increasing speed from 1600 to 1800 rpm reduced the corrected cut size (d50c) from 12.0 to 9.72 µm and increased overall solid recovery from 40.0% to 56.2%. However, hydraulic bypass increased from 8.35% to 14.9%, accompanied by a slight reduction in separation sharpness (α), indicating that improvements in mechanical capture are partially offset by enhanced hydraulic transport effects.
- Primary Separation Limitation: The critical constraint is ultrafine particle recovery. While recovery of particles coarser than 20 µm exceeded 98% under all conditions, recovery of particles finer than 20 µm remained limited (22.0–35.1%). As the feed is predominantly ultrafine (D50 = 8–13 µm), the overall separation efficiency was modulated by this limited fine capture.
- Implication for Industrial Viability: The moderate overall solid recovery implies that 44%–60% of feed solids report to the centrate stream. In an industrial circuit, accumulation of ultrafine particles in recycled process water would progressively increase slurry rheology and compromise operational stability. Therefore, centrifugation within the tested speed range is mechanically viable but hydraulically constrained.
- Outlook and Future Work: The conclusions derived from this pilot investigation form the foundation for Part 2 of this study, in which a mathematical modeling framework will be demonstrated to simulate and optimize decanter centrifuge performance. The model intends to enable predictive evaluation of operating conditions beyond the tested range, including higher rotational speeds, feed pre-conditioning strategies, and ultrafine management approaches. This modeling approach provides a systematic tool for assessing industrial feasibility and guiding process optimization without reliance on extensive pilot-scale experimentation.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Song, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhao, F.; Zhao, R.; Wang, L. The evolution and causality of global bauxite flow since the 21st century: Based on the resource flow field model. J. Transp. Geogr. 2025, 128, 104346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- das Neves, M.N.B.; Gama, M.A.P.; Ishihara, J.H.; da Silva Filho, D.P.; Ferreira, G.C.; Noronha, N.C.; Sánchez, L.E.; Paschoal, J.P. Closure process of bauxite tailings facilities: The induction of ecological succession can enhance substrate quality in the initial phase of revegetation. Ecol. Eng. 2024, 209, 107400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banerjee, P.K.; Mankar, A.U.; Kumar, V. Chapter 4—Beneficiation of bauxite ores. In Mineral Processing; Rajendran, C.H.S., Murty, V.G.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 117–166. [Google Scholar]
- Moura, C.B.; Chaves, A.P.; Felipe, R.A.d.S.; Júnior, H.D. Evaluating the Behavior of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering in Decanter Centrifuges. Minerals 2024, 14, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, A. Bauxitas No Brasil: Síntese de um Programa de Pesquisa. Doctoral Dissertation, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- van Deursen, C.M. Métodos de Desaguamento e Disposição de Rejeito da Bauxita: Estudo de Caso e Avaliação Econômica. Master’s Thesis, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Franks, D.M.; Boger, D.V.; Côte, C.M.; Mulligan, D.R. Sustainable development principles for the disposal of mining and mineral processing wastes. Resour. Policy 2011, 36, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, J.A.; Andrade, M.C.; Dutra, A. Bauxita. In Rochas e Minerais Industriais, 2nd ed.; Luz, A.B., Lins, F.A.F., Eds.; CETEM/MCT: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2008; pp. 311–377. [Google Scholar]
- Wills, B.A.; Finch, J.A. Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, 8th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hamraoui, L.; Bergani, A.; Ettoumi, M.; Aboulaich, A.; Taha, Y.; Khalil, A.; Neculita, C.M.; Benzaazoua, M. Towards a Circular Economy in the Mining Industry: Possible Solutions for Water Recovery through Advanced Mineral Tailings Dewatering. Minerals 2024, 14, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adewuyi, S.O.; Anani, A.; Luxbacher, K. Advancing sustainable and circular mining through solid-liquid recovery of mine tailings. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 189, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, M.O.; Moura, A.C.; Cota, G.E.; Magalhães, A.P. World Overview of the tailings dam failures. Cad. De Geogr. 2020, 30, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loftus, T. Complexities of tailings management: Emphasising comprehensive dewatering process design and optimisation. In Paste 2025, Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings; Fourie, A.B., Copeland, A., Daigle, V., MacRobert, C., Eds.; Australian Centre for Geomechanics: Perth, Australia, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Ulrich, B. Practical thoughts regarding filtered tailings. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Paste, Thickened and Filtered Tailings; Australian Centre for Geomechanics: Perth, Australia, 2019; pp. 71–79. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, H.; Tang, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, L. Strengthening solid–liquid separation of bauxite residue through the synergy of charge neutralization and flocculation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 285, 120296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortoleto, D.A.; Costa, A.S.; Angélica, R.S.; Paz, S.P.A. Flocculation performance of an anionic copolymer for two amazonian fluid ultrafine-fine mineral tailings: Bauxite and copper. Miner. Eng. 2025, 230, 109428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.; Park, H.; Wang, L. Modelling solid-liquid separation and particle size classification in decanter centrifuges. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 263, 118408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baust, H.K.; Hammerich, S.; König, H.; Nirschl, H.; Gleiß, M. Resolved simulation of the clarification and dewatering in decanter centrifuges. Processes 2024, 12, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Menesklou, P.; Nirschl, H.; Gleiss, M. Dewatering of finely dispersed calcium carbonate-water slurries in decanter centrifuges: About modelling of a dynamic simulation tool. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 251, 117287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kynch, G.J. A theory of sedimentation. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1952, 48, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Records, A.; Sutherland, K. Decanter Centrifuge Handbook; Elsevier Advanced Technology: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. Fundamental Study of the Sedimentation of Copper Tailings with Kynch Theory. Master’s Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Coe, H.S.; Clevenger, G.H. Methods for determining the capacities of slime-settling tanks. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 1916, 55, 356–384. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. Segregation and Hindered Settling Behavior of Mine Tailings Suspension. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hassan, S.; Ekanayake, N.I.K.; Scales, P.J.; Batterham, R.J.; Stickland, A.D. Quantifying the effect of ultra-fine particles on dewatering performance in bimodal suspensions. Powder Technol. 2025, 458, 120986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ginisty, P.; Mailler, R.; Rocher, V. Sludge conditioning, thickening and dewatering optimization in a screw centrifuge decanter: Which means for which result? J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 280, 111745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mailler, R.; Ponce de léon, M.; Rocher, V.; Ginisty, P. Application of a laboratory screw decanter to evaluate sludge behaviour in mechanical thickening and dewatering: Preliminary results. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boger, D.V. Rheology and the resource industries. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 4525–4536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Höfgen, E.; Collini, D.; Batterham, R.J.; Scales, P.J.; Stickland, A.D. High pressure dewatering rolls: Comparison of a novel prototype to existing industrial technology. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 205, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louzada, J.C.G. Princípio da Entropia Máxima Aplicado à Reologia de Suspensões de Minério de Ferro. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, H.; Hu, Y.; Wang, D. Selective depression of diaspore with waxy maize starch. Miner. Eng. 2010, 23, 1192–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, D.; Hou, X.; Yang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, P.; Yang, B.; Ma, K. Calibration of water inrush channel and numerical simulation of water inrush process in coal mine roof. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 931508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Concha, F. Solid-Liquid Separation in the Mining Industry; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, A.; Cheng, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L. Development and challenge of paste technology in China. In Proceedings of the 20th International Seminar on Paste and Thickened Tailings; University of Science and Technology Beijing: Beijing, China, 2017; pp. 2–11. [Google Scholar]
- Kinnarinen, T.; Häkkinen, A. Experimental study on the influence of selected process variables on the separation of a fine particle suspension with a pilot scale decanter centrifuge. Part. Sci. Technol. 2013, 31, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, P.; Zhou, D.; Li, W.; Deng, M. Structural optimization of mining decanter centrifuge based on response surface method and multi-objective genetic algorithm. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2025, 212, 110276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Retter, E.A.; Schilp, R. Solid-bowl centrifuges for wastewater sludge treatment. Filtr. Sep. 1994, 31, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, X.; Cai, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Bai, G. Investigation on the separation performance and multiparameter optimization of decanter centrifuges. Processes 2022, 10, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, W.W.-F. 15—Flocculation with Decanter Centrifuges. In Centrifugal Separations in Biotechnology, 2nd ed.; Leung, W.W.-F., Ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 331–352. [Google Scholar]
- Schubert, T.; Ergin, I.; Panetta, F.; Hinrichs, J.; Atamer, Z. Application of a temperature-controlled decanter centrifuge for the fractionation of αS-, β- and κ-casein on pilot scale. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 122, 105148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, T.; Meric, A.; Boom, R.; Hinrichs, J.; Atamer, Z. Application of a decanter centrifuge for casein fractionation on pilot scale: Effect of operational parameters on total solid, purity and yield in solid discharge. Int. Dairy J. 2018, 84, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mou, Y.; Zhong, L.; Liu, W.; Jin, G.; Song, F.; Li, Z.; Teng, J.; Song, C. Optimization of drum rotation speed of decanter centrifuge for dewatering with different sludge properties. J. Water Process Eng. 2025, 71, 107221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Zhou, F.; Fu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, C.; Yuan, H.; Yu, S. Study on the separation performance of a decanter centrifuge used for dewatering coal water slurry. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 195, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leone, A.; Perone, C.; Berardi, A.; Tamborrino, A. Energy analysis and numerical evaluation of the decanter centrifuge for wastewater management to allow a sustainable energy planning of the process. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2024, 22, 100596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, S.; Jiang, Y. Influence of the length-diameter ratio and the depth of liquid pool in a bowl on separation performance of a decanter centrifuge. In Advanced Manufacturing and Automation VIII; Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Wang, K., Wang, Y., Strandhagen, J.O., Yu, T., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 484, pp. 78–85. [Google Scholar]
- Ambler, C.M. The evaluation of centrifuge performance. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1952, 48, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
- Chhabra, R.P.; Richardson, J.F. Non-Newtonian Flow in the Process Industries: Fundamentals and Engineering Applications; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]










| Feature | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Operation | Continuous and Automatic: Allows for high throughput and reduced personnel costs [36,37]. | Optimal settings are complex to predict due to high shear stresses and flow complexity [26,27]. |
| Slurry Type | Versatile: Handles high solid concentrations (e.g., >5%–10% v/v) and hard-to-filter slurries containing fine particles, unlike filters [21,35,39]. | Cannot usually match the clarification performance or ultra-low moisture content achieved by high-pressure filters [11,21]. |
| Environmental | Enclosed Operation: Reduces odors and the risk of infection, especially important for biological sludges [37]. | High rotational energy means component failure can cause severe damage [21]. |
| Economics | Can have total operating costs at least 20% lower than conventional technology, especially due to reduced chemical and disposal costs [37]. | High capital cost (CAPEX) compared to methods like hydrocyclones [11]. |
| Maintenance | Low maintenance expenditure and personnel deployment compared to filter presses [19]. | Abrasion protection is essential when handling abrasive materials like secondary sludges or drilling mud [21]. |
| Test Condition | Power Law | Casson | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Pa·sn] | [Pa] | [×10−3 Pa·s] | ||||
| T1—1700 rpm (13.6% wt/wt) | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 1.00 | 12.9 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 0.98 |
| T2—1800 rpm (12.5% wt/wt) | 5.2 ± 0.0 | 0.16 ± 0.00 | 0.98 | 7.5 ± 0.0 | 3.5 ± 0.0 | 0.99 |
| T3—1600 rpm (14.4% wt/wt) | 18.7 ± 0.1 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 1.00 | 22.2 ± 0.0 | 11.0 ± 0.1 | 0.98 |
| Flow | S.G. |
|---|---|
| Decanter Feed | 2.60 |
| Decanter Centrate | 2.48 |
| Decanter Cake | 2.83 |
| Size (µm) | Cumulative Passing % | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1600 rpm | 1700 rpm | 1800 rpm | |||||||
| Feed | Centrate | Cake | Feed | Centrate | Cake | Feed | Centrate | Cake | |
| 1500 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 1000 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 500 | 99.8 | 100 | 99.9 | 99.7 | 100 | 99.9 | 99.6 | 100 | 99.9 |
| 200 | 98.0 | 100 | 96.0 | 97.6 | 100 | 96.2 | 96.9 | 100 | 95.4 |
| 150 | 96.7 | 100 | 91.9 | 96.0 | 100 | 92.3 | 94.9 | 100 | 91.1 |
| 100 | 93.9 | 100 | 82.9 | 92.8 | 100 | 83.9 | 91.0 | 100 | 81.9 |
| 74 | 91.1 | 100 | 74.4 | 89.6 | 100 | 75.8 | 87.1 | 100 | 73.3 |
| 37 | 82.4 | 99.7 | 52.8 | 80.0 | 100 | 54.8 | 75.8 | 99.7 | 51.9 |
| 20 | 72.5 | 96.8 | 35.7 | 69.4 | 99.4 | 37.8 | 64.1 | 97.4 | 35.2 |
| 10 | 60.4 | 85.7 | 21.5 | 56.8 | 91.8 | 23.3 | 50.8 | 87.6 | 21.3 |
| 5.0 | 48.5 | 66.5 | 12.5 | 44.9 | 70.9 | 13.8 | 38.8 | 69.8 | 12.5 |
| 2.5 | 37.9 | 45.9 | 7.1 | 34.4 | 45.8 | 8.0 | 28.8 | 49.6 | 7.1 |
| D98 (µm) | 45.9 | 17.6 | 202 | 55.6 | 15.9 | 191 | 74.8 | 15.6 | 209 |
| D90 (µm) | 27.0 | 10.3 | 119 | 32.7 | 9.3 | 112 | 44.0 | 9.2 | 123 |
| D80 (µm) | 18.9 | 7.2 | 83.1 | 22.9 | 6.5 | 78.5 | 30.8 | 6.4 | 85.8 |
| D75 (µm) | 16.3 | 6.2 | 71.6 | 19.7 | 5.6 | 67.6 | 26.5 | 5.5 | 73.9 |
| D50 (µm) | 8.1 | 3.1 | 35.8 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 33.8 | 13.3 | 2.8 | 37.0 |
| D25 (µm) | 3.4 | 1.3 | 14.9 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 14.0 | 5.5 | 1.1 | 15.3 |
| Test Condition | Bowl Speed (rpm) | G-Force |
|---|---|---|
| Test 3 | 1600 | 888 |
| Test 1 | 1700 | 1003 |
| Test 2 | 1800 | 1124 |
| Parameter | Unit | Test 3 (1600 rpm) | Test 1 (1700 rpm) | Test 2 (1800 rpm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feed solid throughput | t/h | 6.31 | 5.92 | 5.35 |
| Feed solid dilution by weight | % wt/wt | 14.40 | 13.65 | 12.52 |
| Cake solid throughput | t/h | 2.52 | 2.72 | 3.01 |
| Cake solid dilution by weight | % wt/wt | 66.30 | 68.90 | 71.50 |
| Centrate solid dilution by weight | % wt/wt | 2.48 | 1.11 | 1.20 |
| Solid recovery (to cake) | % | 40.0 | 46.0 | 56.2 |
| Water recovery (to centrate) | % | 96.6 | 96.7 | 96.8 |
| Test | Bowl Speed (rpm) | G Force | Mass Recovery—Particles Coarser Than 20 µm (%) | Mass Recovery—Particles Finer Than 20 µm (%) | Overall Mass Recovery to Cake (%) | Cake Dilution (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1600 | 888 | 98.24 | 21.93 | 40.03 | 33.70 |
| 1 | 1700 | 1003 | 98.61 | 26.40 | 46.02 | 31.10 |
| 2 | 1800 | 1124 | 99.08 | 35.09 | 56.22 | 28.50 |
| Test | Bowl Speed (rpm) | G Force | Overall Mass Recovery to Cake (%) | Corrected d50 (µm) | Inclination (α) | Bypass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1600 | 888 | 40.03 | 12.0 | 2.80 | 8.35 |
| 1 | 1700 | 1003 | 46.02 | 11.1 | 2.66 | 10.4 |
| 2 | 1800 | 1124 | 56.22 | 9.72 | 2.47 | 14.9 |
| Test | Bowl Speed (rpm) | Corrected d50 (µm) | Inclination (α) | Bypass (%) | Yield Stress (Pa) | μapp 100 s−1 (Pa·s) | Cake Solids (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1600 | 11.99 | 2.80 | 8.35 | 22.2 | 0.332 | 66.3 |
| 1 | 1700 | 11.10 | 2.66 | 10.43 | 12.9 | 0.194 | 68.9 |
| 2 | 1800 | 9.72 | 2.47 | 14.92 | 7.5 | 0.111 | 71.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Alves de Souza Felipe, R.; Botarro Moura, C.; Antônio Hoffman Gatti Filho, C.; Delboni, H., Jr. Pilot-Scale Investigation of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering by Decanter Centrifuge—Part 1: Process Performance and Fine Particle Recovery. Minerals 2026, 16, 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050554
Alves de Souza Felipe R, Botarro Moura C, Antônio Hoffman Gatti Filho C, Delboni H Jr. Pilot-Scale Investigation of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering by Decanter Centrifuge—Part 1: Process Performance and Fine Particle Recovery. Minerals. 2026; 16(5):554. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050554
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlves de Souza Felipe, Rafael, Camila Botarro Moura, Carlos Antônio Hoffman Gatti Filho, and Homero Delboni, Jr. 2026. "Pilot-Scale Investigation of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering by Decanter Centrifuge—Part 1: Process Performance and Fine Particle Recovery" Minerals 16, no. 5: 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050554
APA StyleAlves de Souza Felipe, R., Botarro Moura, C., Antônio Hoffman Gatti Filho, C., & Delboni, H., Jr. (2026). Pilot-Scale Investigation of Bauxite Tailings Dewatering by Decanter Centrifuge—Part 1: Process Performance and Fine Particle Recovery. Minerals, 16(5), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050554

