Probabilistic Modeling of Lateritic Nickel Mineral Resources
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Related Work
3. Literature Review
3.1. Unfolding
- Simple unfolding (or “unwrinkling”), in which data are transformed relative to a 2D unfolding surface [11].
- Stratigraphic coordinate transformation, where data are mapped and scaled between two bounding stratigraphic surfaces [12].
- Full 3D unfolding, in which data are transformed using a volumetric deformation model (e.g., tetrahedral grids) to obtain a geometrically consistent unfolded domain [13].
- Locally varying anisotropy (LVA), also referred to as dynamic anisotropy, where data remain in Cartesian space, while search neighborhoods and variogram ellipsoids are locally reoriented to follow geological trends [14].
3.2. Pluri-Gaussian Simulation (PGS)
- Define a truncation rule describing the contact relationships between categories. For simple stratigraphic deposits, this rule can be defined in one dimension (Truncated Gaussian Simulation (TGS)), whereas more complex geological environments may require two or more dimensions (Pluri-Gaussian Simulation (PGS)).
- Assign Gaussian values to the categorical samples in a manner consistent with the inferred variogram model, using a Gibbs sampling algorithm.
- Simulate the Gaussian variable(s) using an appropriate Gaussian simulation algorithm.
- Apply the truncation rule to transform the simulated Gaussian field(s) into categorical realizations. Local proportions, estimated from data or secondary variables, may be incorporated to locally adjust the truncation thresholds on a block-by-block basis while preserving the prescribed contact relationships.
3.3. Multivariate Imputation
- Estimate, at a location with missing data, the prior distribution of the variable to be imputed using neighboring data of the same variable. Under the multiGaussian assumption, this corresponds to the simple kriging conditional distribution and represents the distribution of potential outcomes conditioned on spatial information.
- Estimate the likelihood distribution conditioned on the colocated secondary variables. This conditional distribution may be obtained parametrically [22], through kernel density estimation (KDE) [22], or using Gaussian mixture models (GMM) [23], and represents the distribution of potential outcomes conditioned on multivariate relationships.
- Combine the prior and likelihood distributions through Bayesian updating to obtain the posterior conditional distribution.
- Generate an imputed value by stochastic sampling from the resulting posterior distribution.
3.4. Compositional Data
3.5. Projection Pursuit Multivariate Transform (PPMT)
- Apply a univariate Gaussian transformation to each variable.
- Perform a sphering transformation.
- Identify a projection direction that maximizes deviation from Gaussianity.
- Gaussianize the data along the selected projection.
- Repeat steps 3 and 4 until the joint distribution converges to a multivariate Gaussian distribution with identity covariance matrix.
3.6. Turning Bands Simulation (TBS)
- Generate a set of independent one-dimensional Gaussian random functions along multiple directions (bands), each reproducing the target covariance model projected onto the corresponding line.
- For each spatial location to be simulated, project the point orthogonally onto every band and extract the simulated value at the corresponding intersection.
- Compute a normalized average of the extracted values to obtain the non-conditional simulated value , which reproduces the prescribed covariance model in expectation.
- Impose conditioning to the available data through kriging-based residual correction: , where is the conditional simulated value, is the kriged residual between observed data and the non-conditional simulation, and is the non-conditional simulation.
- Apply the inverse Gaussian transformation to recover values in the original data domain.
4. Case Study
4.1. Geological Context
4.2. Dataset Presentation
4.3. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Deutsch, C.V. The Place of Geostatistical Simulation through the Life Cycle of a Mineral Deposit. Minerals 2023, 13, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conoras, W.A.K.; Lamburu, A.A. Modeling and Resource Classification Lateritic Nickel Deposits on a Heterogeneous Block in The Haul-Sagu Area using Estimation and Simulation Geostatistical Method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1569, 042079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richmond, A. Conditional Simulation of a Nickel Laterite Deposit using Unfolding. In Proceedings of the 36th International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry (APCOM 2013), Porto Alegre, Brazil, 4–8 November 2013; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Toro, J.A.A.d.; Carballo-Pena, A.; Estevez-Cruz, E.; Cobas-Botey, R.M. Modelaje probabilístico y cuantificación de la incertidumbre de los horizontes de la corteza de meteorización del depósito de níquel San Felipe. Minería Geol. 2024, 40, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Dagasan, Y.; Erten, O.; Renard, P. Multiple-point statistical simulation of the ore boundaries for a lateritic bauxite deposit. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2019, 33, 865–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deraisme, J.; Bertoli, O.; Epinoux, P. Multivariate block simulations of a lateritic nickel deposit and post-processing of a representative subset. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2014, 114, 673–680. [Google Scholar]
- de Freitas Silva, M.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Simulation of weathered profiles coupled with multivariate block-support simulation of the Puma nickel laterite deposit, Brazil. Eng. Geol. 2016, 215, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neves, C.; Costa, J.; Souza, L.; Guimaraes, F.; Dias, G. Methodology for Defining the Optimal Drilling Grid in a Laterite Nickel Deposit Based on a Conditional Simulation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isatelle, F.; Rivoirard, J. Mineral Resources classification of a nickel laterite deposit: Comparison between conditional simulations and specific areas. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2019, 119, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renaldy; Heriawan, M.N.; Morales, A.T. A Comparative Study of Conditional Simulation and Specific Area Methods for Nickel Laterite Mineral Resource Classification: Insights from Central Halmahera, North Maluku, Indonesia. Min. Metall. Explor. 2026, 43, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deutsch, C.V. Practical Unfolding for Geostatistical Modelling of Vein-Type and Complex Tabular Mineral Deposits. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on the Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Mineral Industry (APCOM 2005), Tucson, AZ, USA, 30 March–1 April 2005; pp. 197–202. [Google Scholar]
- Latifi, A.M.; Boisvert, J.B. Stratigraphic Coordinate Transformation. In Geostatistics Lessons; Deutsch, J.L., Ed.; 2022; Available online: https://geostatisticslessons.com/lessons/stratcoords (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Isatis.neo User Guide. Datamine Software. 2026. Available online: https://docs.dataminesoftware.com/IsatisNeo/Latest/Isatis-Users-Guide/garde-User-Guide.html (accessed on 25 February 2026).
- Boisvert, J.B.; Manchuk, J.G.; Deutsch, C.V. Kriging in the Presence of Locally Varying Anisotropy Using Non-Euclidean Distances. Math. Geosci. 2009, 41, 585–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabert, F. Stochastic Imaging of Spatial Distributions Using Hard and Soft Information. Master’s Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Canada, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Armstrong, M.; Galli, A.; Beucher, H.; Loc’h, G.; Renard, D.; Doligez, B.; Eschard, R.; Geffroy, F. Plurigaussian Simulations in Geosciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, D. Enhanced Geologic Modeling of Multiple Categorical Variables. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Strebelle, S.B. Sequential Simulation Drawing Structures from Training Images; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Mariethoz, G.; Renard, P.; Straubhaar, J. The direct sampling method to perform multiple-point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46, W11536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desassis, N.; Renard, D.; Beucher, H.; Petiteau, S.; Freulon, X. A Pairwise Likelihood Approach for the Empirical Estimation of the Underlying Variograms in the Plurigaussian Models. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1510.02668. [Google Scholar]
- Erten, G.E.; da Silva, C.Z.; Boisvert, J. Decorrelation and Imputation Methods for Multivariate Modeling. In Applied Spatiotemporal Data Analytics and Machine Learning; Chapter 1; Maucec, D.M., Yarus, P.J.M., Coburn, D.T.C., Pyrcz, P.M.J., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, R.M.; Deutsch, C.V. Multivariate imputation of unequally sampled geological variables. Math. Geosci. 2015, 47, 791–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, D.S.; Deutsch, C.V. Multivariate data imputation using Gaussian mixture models. Spat. Stat. 2018, 27, 74–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1982, 44, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, R.M.; Deutsch, C.V. Why the Log in Logratios? Technical Report CCG Paper 2013-108; Centre for Computational Geostatistics (CCG): Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bassani, M.A.A.; Coimbra Leite Costa, J.F.; Deutsch, C.V. Multivariate geostatistical simulation with sum and fraction constraints. Appl. Earth Sci. 2018, 127, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hotelling, H. Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components. J. Educ. Psychol. 1933, 24, 417–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Switzer, P.; Green, A.A. Min/Max Autocorrelation Factors for Multivariate Spatial Imaging; Technical report; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Barnett, R.M. Projection Pursuit Multivariate Transform. 2017. Available online: https://geostatisticslessons.com/lessons/ppmt (accessed on 26 February 2026).
- Leuangthong, O.; Deutsch, C.V. Stepwise Conditional Transformation for Simulation of Multiple Variables. Math. Geol. 2003, 35, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, A.; Rondon, O.; Graindorge, J.; Booth, G. Iterative Gaussianisation for Multivariate Transformation. In Proceedings of the Geostatistics Toronto 2021; Avalos Sotomayor, S.A., Ortiz, J.M., Srivastava, R.M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 21–35. [Google Scholar]
- Avalos, S.; Ortiz, J.M. Spatial Multivariate Morphing Transformation. Math. Geosci. 2023, 55, 735–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, R.M.; Manchuk, J.G.; Deutsch, C.V. Projection Pursuit Multivariate Transformation. Math. Geosci. 2014, 46, 337–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnett, R.M.; Manchuk, J.G.; Deutsch, C.V. The Projection-Pursuit Multivariate Transform for Improved Continuous Variable Modeling. SPE J. 2016, 21, 2010–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Journel, A.G.; Huijbregts, C.J. Mining Geostatistics; Academic Press: London, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Matheron, G. The Intrinsic Random Functions and Their Applications. Adv. Appl. Probab. 1973, 5, 439–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcotte, D. Direct Conditional Simulation of Block Grades. In Geostatistics for the Next Century: An International Forum in Honour of Michel David’s Contribution to Geostatistics, Montreal, 1993; Dimitrakopoulos, R., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boucher, A.; Dimitrakopoulos, R. Block Simulation of Multiple Correlated Variables. Math. Geosci. 2009, 41, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emery, X.; Ortiz, J.M. Two Approaches to Direct Block-Support Conditional Co-Simulation. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37, 1625–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLennan, J.A.; Deutsch, C.V. Conditional Bias of Geostatistical Simulation for Estimation of Recoverable Reserves; Technical report; Centre for Computational Geostatistics, University of Alberta: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Elias, M. Nickel Laterite Deposits: Geological Overview, Resources and Exploitation. In Centre for Ore Deposit Research Special Publication; University of Tasmania: Dynnyrne, Australia, 2002; Volume 4, pp. 205–220. [Google Scholar]
- Qu, J.; Deutsch, C.V. Geostatistical Simulation with a Trend Using Gaussian Mixture Models. Nat. Resour. Res. 2018, 27, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emery, X.; Silva, D.A. Conditional co-simulation of continuous and categorical variables for geostatistical applications. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35, 1234–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassani, M.A.A.; Costa, J.F.C.L.; Deutsch, C.V. A Comparative Study Between the Direct and Indirect Methods in Geostatistical Simulation. Min. Metall. Explor. 2024, 41, 3669–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, D.S.F.; Boisvert, J.B. Mineral Resource Classification: A Comparison of New and Existing Techniques. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2014, 114, 199–208. [Google Scholar]
- Cabral Pinto, F.A. Advances in Data Spacing and Uncertainty. Master’s Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




























Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Rolo, R.; Arief, J.; Yuminti, S. Probabilistic Modeling of Lateritic Nickel Mineral Resources. Minerals 2026, 16, 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050551
Rolo R, Arief J, Yuminti S. Probabilistic Modeling of Lateritic Nickel Mineral Resources. Minerals. 2026; 16(5):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050551
Chicago/Turabian StyleRolo, Roberto, Jafar Arief, and Selvi Yuminti. 2026. "Probabilistic Modeling of Lateritic Nickel Mineral Resources" Minerals 16, no. 5: 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050551
APA StyleRolo, R., Arief, J., & Yuminti, S. (2026). Probabilistic Modeling of Lateritic Nickel Mineral Resources. Minerals, 16(5), 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/min16050551

