Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Compressibility of Novel Nickel Carbide at Pressures of Earth’s Outer Core
Next Article in Special Issue
Development and Validation of an Online Analyzer for Particle Size Distribution in Conveyor Belts
Previous Article in Journal
A New Constraint on the Physicochemical Condition of Mars Surface during the Amazonian Epoch Based on Chemical Speciation for Secondary Minerals in Martian Nakhlites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of Cell-Based Flotation Circuits under Uncertainty: A Techno-Economic Stochastic Optimization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Sintering Characteristics of Ultra-Poor Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite

1
School of Materials and Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China
2
School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2021, 11(5), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050515
Submission received: 28 March 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 6 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Process Optimization in Mineral Processing)

Abstract

Artificial rich ore for blast furnace use can be produced by sintering ultra-poor vanadium-titanium magnetite (PVTM) with a high-grade iron concentrate. Here, acid (R = 0.33, 0.50), self-fluxing (R = 1.10), and high-basicity (R = 2.60) PVTM sinters were produced in a sinter pot. Their performances were determined using the comprehensive index. The microstructures of the PVTM sinter were observed by metallographic microscope and scanning electron microscopy equipped with an energy dispersion spectrum (SEM-EDS). The results suggest that the acid PVTM sinter had a low flame front speed, low productivity, an uneven size distribution, and poor softening properties. It did have a high tumble index (TI) and low-temperature reduction disintegration index (RDI). The self-fluxing PVTM sinter had the worst performance (TI, RDI, reducibility index (RI)), while the high-basicity PVTM sinter had the highest flame front speed, highest productivity, a reasonable size distribution, excellent softening properties, and satisfactory TI and RDI values. The main consolidation form of the acid sinter was crystal stock, the main bonding phase of the self-fluxing sinter was silicate, and the main bonding phase of the high-basicity sinter was silico-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA). The comprehensive index values (from high to low) were the high-basicity (R = 2.60), acid (R = 0.50), natural acid (R = 0.33), and self-fluxing (R = 1.10) PVTM sinters. When the production capacity of the acid pellet was in shortage, the acid PVTM sinter (R = 0.50) could be produced by the surplus from the sinter plant. This replaced a part of the acid pellet and the burden structural model of the blast furnace smelting vanadium so the titanium burden could adopt a ‘high-basicity PVTM sinter + acid V-Ti pellet + acid (R = 0.50) PVTM sinter’.
Keywords: acid sinter; self-fluxing; basicity; sinter; vanadium-titanium magnetite; blast furnace acid sinter; self-fluxing; basicity; sinter; vanadium-titanium magnetite; blast furnace

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, S.; Zhou, M.; Jiang, T.; Xue, X. Study on Sintering Characteristics of Ultra-Poor Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite. Minerals 2021, 11, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050515

AMA Style

Yang S, Zhou M, Jiang T, Xue X. Study on Sintering Characteristics of Ultra-Poor Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite. Minerals. 2021; 11(5):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Songtao, Mi Zhou, Tao Jiang, and Xiangxin Xue. 2021. "Study on Sintering Characteristics of Ultra-Poor Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite" Minerals 11, no. 5: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050515

APA Style

Yang, S., Zhou, M., Jiang, T., & Xue, X. (2021). Study on Sintering Characteristics of Ultra-Poor Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite. Minerals, 11(5), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11050515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop