Next Article in Journal
IntentProv-IoV: Causally Grounded Provenance for Traffic-Intent Preservation in Explainable Vehicular Security
Previous Article in Journal
Toward an Acoustic Characterization of Street Cries: A Machine Learning-Based Approach with Parsimonious Feature Selection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

A Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology

1
College of Computer Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
School of Information and Communication, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2026, 18(9), 1431; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091431
Submission received: 14 July 2026 / Revised: 15 August 2026 / Accepted: 18 August 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026
(This article belongs to the Section A: Computer Science)

Abstract

Retrieval-augmented generation has emerged as a core technological paradigm for addressing the bottlenecks of hallucinations and knowledge lag in large language models. However, many existing reviews focus on a single technical branch or vertical application scenario, making only scattered references to hardware, evaluation methods, and cross-industry empirical evidence, and lacking a systematic, end-to-end integration. This paper conducts research based on a total of 115 papers, comprising foundational literature from 1998–2019 and core RAG literature from 2020–2026, systematically cataloging end-to-end technologies and supporting solutions, establishing a quantitative hardware comparison table and comparing 11 categories of open-source and commercial APIs, constructing a two-tier, four-level standardized evaluation framework, and compiling empirical evidence and implementation challenges across eight industries from 2024 to 2026. Based on this, the paper identifies four major structural contradictions—the retrieval–creation trade-off, the geometric–semantic misalignment as a symmetry problem between representation space and semantic structure, the autonomy–reliability paradox, and evaluation blind spots—as a unified analytical framework for the five major technological strands. Finally, this paper proposes four research directions for practical implementation—differentiable joint optimization, hybrid geometric space learning, interpretable causal reasoning, and multidimensional diagnostic evaluation—providing a systematic reference for both theoretical research on RAG and its deployment in the private sector.
Keywords: retrieval-enhanced generation; large model hallucinations; standardized evaluation; structural contradictions; analytical framework retrieval-enhanced generation; large model hallucinations; standardized evaluation; structural contradictions; analytical framework

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, P.; Cai, X. A Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology. Symmetry 2026, 18, 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091431

AMA Style

Jiang P, Cai X. A Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology. Symmetry. 2026; 18(9):1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091431

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Peng, and Xiaodong Cai. 2026. "A Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology" Symmetry 18, no. 9: 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091431

APA Style

Jiang, P., & Cai, X. (2026). A Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technology. Symmetry, 18(9), 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18091431

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop