Next Article in Journal
The Development and Progress of Multi-Physics Simulation Design for TSV-Based 3D Integrated System
Next Article in Special Issue
The Origin of the Difference between Space and Time
Previous Article in Journal
New Generalization of Metric-Type Spaces—Strong Controlled
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting the Okubo–Marshak Argument
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Noncommutative Correction to the Entropy of Charged BTZ Black Hole

Symmetry 2023, 15(2), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020417
by Tajron Jurić * and Filip Požar
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Symmetry 2023, 15(2), 417; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020417
Submission received: 22 December 2022 / Revised: 13 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 4 February 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

cxThis is a good and interesting paper, concerning the noncommutative version of the charged BTZ black hole. The authors claim to compute the entropy of this black hole. This paper is generally very well written and well organized, but I have some serious doubts, whether it is mathematically correct? 

 

The authors make some approximations and then the corrections should have the same mass dimension, or length dimension, as the object itself. See for instance equation (105): There are three equations and I claim that only the middle equation is mathematically correct and two others are incorrect. 

 

Take for instance the third equation in equation (105): Here the object is clearly dimensionless, but the correction clearly has the length dimension length squared. The correction should of course be $r/l$ squared, or something like that, so that it is dimensionless. The same for the first equation in equation (105). Etc etc. 

 

 

Further revision is necessary. Major revision. 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see the attached pdf file: Report--symmetry-2146066

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors of this paper, have answered my question and comment, which I raised in my first report, in a very satisfying way and they have improved their paper in many different ways, so I can now clearly recommend this paper for publication in this journal. 

The authors of this paper, have answered my question and comment, which I raised in my first report, in a very satisfying way and they have improved their paper in many different ways, so I can now clearly recommend this paper for publication in this journal. 

 

Back to TopTop