Next Article in Journal
A Simple Semi-Analytic Contact Mechanical Model for Tangential and Torsional Fretting Wear of Axisymmetric Contacts
Next Article in Special Issue
Applying the Dijkstra Algorithm to Solve a Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Environment
Previous Article in Journal
A Combined Model Based on EOBL-CSSA-LSSVM for Power Load Forecasting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intuitionistic Fuzzy (IF) Overlap Functions and IF-Rough Sets with Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fuzzy Sawi Decomposition Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Fuzzy Differential Equations

by
Atanaska Georgieva
1,* and
Albena Pavlova
2
1
Department of Mathematical Analysis, University of Plovdiv Paisii Hilendarski, 24 Tzar Asen, 4003 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2
Department of MPC, Technical University-Sofia, Plovdiv Branch, 25 Tzanko Djustabanov Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2021, 13(9), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091580
Submission received: 22 July 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 27 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics with Applications)

Abstract

:
The main goal of this paper is to propose a new decomposition method for finding solutions to nonlinear partial fuzzy differential equations (NPFDE) through the fuzzy Sawi decomposition method (FSDM). This method is a combination of the fuzzy Sawi transformation and Adomian decomposition method. For this purpose, two new theorems for fuzzy Sawi transformation regarding fuzzy partial gH-derivatives are introduced. The use of convex symmetrical triangular fuzzy numbers creates symmetry between the lower and upper representations of the fuzzy solution. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the method, a numerical example is provided.

1. Introduction

A fundamental problem in the process of modeling phenomena is the immense quantity and quality of information that has to be included, such that it is as representative as possible of the real system. The process of the derivation of mathematical models is set to limitations, such as correct understanding, ambiguity in the accuracy and uncertainty of the data, and measurement errors that lead to uncertainties in the model. Fuzzy modeling is an effective method that enables researchers to express scientific issues.
The modeling of many physical phenomena, such as dynamical and magnetic systems, engineering, biological and environmental issues, and humanities phenomena, result in the use of differential equations. Partial differential equations are mathematical equations that appear in a number of fields, such as physics, engineering, chemistry and biology. Many authors have developed analytical and numerical methods for solving different kinds of partial differential equations; see [1,2,3,4].
In order to apply fuzzy differential equations as a modeling tool for dynamical systems, some authors have extended the concept of derivatives in the fuzzy context. This allows to define differential equation in the fuzzy context, which was studied by some authors, such as [5,6,7,8].
In some cases, partial differential equations are not the best option when dealing with real-life phenomena. To model dynamic systems, we need to collect information from a variety of sources. Such data sets are often uncertain. The modeling of these systems with uncertain data has promoted fuzzy partial differential equations to become one of the main topics of modern mathematical analysis, attracting the attention of many authors [9,10,11,12,13,14]. In [15], the reduced differential transformation method was successfully applied for solving fuzzy nonlinear partial differential equations under gH-differentiability.
Integral transformations are the first choice of researchers when finding solutions to critical problems. In [16], the Laplace transformation was applied on mathematical models of population growth and decay. Many scholars [17,18,19,20] applied different integral transforms (Mahgoub; Aboodh; Elzaki transforms) on important problems in mechanics, physical chemistry and life science for finding their exact solutions.
Mahgub [21] proposed the Sawi transformation and determined the primitives of constant coefficient ordinary linear differential equations. Aggarwal and Gupta [22] presented a relationship between Sawi and other fundamental transforms. Singh and Aggarwal [23] applied Sawi transformation in finding solutions to biological problems of growth and decay.
The fuzzy integral transforms are very useful in solving linear partial differential equations because they convert the original function into a function that is simpler to solve [24,25,26]. They do not function well in real applications and can only be used for solving fuzzy linear problems.
The objective of the present paper is to propose a stylish combination of the Adomian decomposition method [27,28] and fuzzy Sawi transformation that can solve nonlinear partial fuzzy differential equations. By using fuzzy Sawi transform, equations are reduced to an algebraic equation. Then, the method of Adomian is used to handle the nonlinear parts of the equation for obtaining the solution. The new decomposition method is then called the fuzzy Sawi decomposition method.
In this paper, we consider symmetric fuzzy triangular numbers. From their parametric form, we obtain the parametric form of the fuzzy functions and we establish symmetry between their upper and lower representations. We also observe symmetry in the parametric representation of fuzzy Sawi transform. The symmetry is also preserved in the application of the fuzzy Sawi transformation of the partial derivatives of the fuzzy functions. When applying the fuzzy Sawi decomposition method to solve the nonlinear partial equation, we obtain a symmetry between the lower and upper representations of of the fuzzy solution.
This paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, definitions on a fuzzy number, fuzzy-valued function and gH-Hukuhara differentiability are given. In Section 3, the definition of fuzzy Sawi transform is introduced. Fuzzy Sawi transformation for the fuzzy partial gH-derivative is proposed. In Section 4, the fuzzy Sawi decomposition method is applied to solve nonlinear partial fuzzy differential equations. Section 5 provides a numerical example to demonstrate the proposed method. Finally, Section 6 consists of conclusions.

2. Basic Concepts

In this section, we review some notions and results of fuzzy numbers, fuzzy-number-valued functions and strongly generalized Hukuhara differentiability.
Definition 1 ([29]).
A fuzzy number is a function u : R [ 0 , 1 ] that satisfies the following properties:
(i)
u is upper semi-continuous on R ;
(ii)
u ( x ) = 0 outside of some interval [ c , d ] ;
(iii)
there are a , b R with c a b d such that u is increasing on [ c , a ] , and decreasing on [ b , d ] and u ( x ) = 1 for each x [ a , b ] ;
(iv)
u ( r x + ( 1 r ) y ) min { u ( x ) , u ( y ) } for any x , y R , r [ 0 , 1 ] .
Denote E 1 the set of all fuzzy numbers. If a R , then it can be interpreted as a fuzzy number; a ˜ = χ { a } is characteristic function and therefore R E 1 .
Definition 2 ([30]).
For 0 < r 1 and u E 1 , the r-level set of u is the crisp set
[ u ] r = { x R : u ( x ) r } .
Then, any r-level set is a bounded and closed interval and denoted by [ u ̲ ( r ) , u ¯ ( r ) ] for all 0 r 1 , where u ̲ , u ¯ : [ 0 , 1 ] R are the lower and upper bounds of [ u ] r , respectively.
Definition 3 ([30]).
A parametric form of fuzzy number u is an ordered pair u = ( u ̲ ( r ) , u ¯ ( r ) ) of functions u ̲ ( r ) and u ¯ ( r ) for any 0 r 1 , which satisfies the following conditions:
(i)
The function u ̲ ( r ) is a bounded left continuous monotonic increasing in [ 0 , 1 ] ;
(ii)
The function u ¯ ( r ) is a bounded left continuous monotonic decreasing in [ 0 , 1 ] ;
(iii)
u ̲ ( r ) u ¯ ( r ) .
For fuzzy number u = ( u ̲ ( r ) , u ¯ ( r ) ) , v = ( v ̲ ( r ) , v ¯ ( r ) ) and k R , the addition and the scalar multiplication are defined by the following:
[ u v ] r = [ u ] r + [ v ] r = [ u ̲ ( r ) + v ̲ ( r ) , u ¯ ( r ) + v ¯ ( r ) ] and
[ k u ] r = k · [ u ] r = [ k u ̲ ( r ) , k u ¯ ( r ) ] , k 0 [ k u ¯ ( r ) , k u ̲ ( r ) ] , k < 0 .
The neutral element, with respect to ⊕ in E 1 , is denoted by 0 ˜ = χ { 0 } . For basic algebraic properties of fuzzy numbers, please see ([29]).
We use the Hausdorff metric as a distance between fuzzy numbers.
Definition 4 ([29]).
For arbitrary fuzzy numbers u = ( u ̲ ( r ) , u ¯ ( r ) ) and v = ( v ̲ ( r ) , v ¯ ( r ) ) , the quantity
d ( u , v ) = sup r [ 0 , 1 ] max { | u ̲ ( r ) v ̲ ( r ) | , | u ¯ ( r ) v ¯ ( r ) | }
is the distance between u and v.
Definition 5 ([31]).
A fuzzy number u E 1 is called to be positive if u ̲ ( 1 ) 0 , strict positive if u ̲ ( 1 ) > 0 , negative if u ¯ ( 1 ) 0 and strict negative if u ¯ ( 1 ) < 0 .
The set of positive (negative) fuzzy numbers is denoted by E + 1 ( E 1 ).
Theorem 1 ([32,33]).
Let u and v be positive fuzzy numbers, then w = u v defined by w ( r ) = [ w ̲ ( r ) , w ¯ ( r ) ] , where the following holds:
w ̲ ( r ) = u ̲ ( r ) v ̲ ( 1 ) + u ̲ ( 1 ) v ̲ ( r ) u ̲ ( 1 ) v ̲ ( 1 )
and
w ¯ ( r ) = u ¯ ( r ) v ¯ ( 1 ) + u ¯ ( 1 ) v ¯ ( r ) u ¯ ( 1 ) v ¯ ( 1 )
for every r [ 0 , 1 ] is a positive fuzzy number.
Let the set D be domain of fuzzy-valued function w. Define the functions w ̲ ( . , . , r ) , w ¯ ( . , . , r ) : D R for all 0 r 1 . These functions are said to be the left and right r level functions of the function w.
Definition 6 ([34]).
A fuzzy-valued function w : D E 1 is said to be continuous at ( s 0 , t 0 ) D if for each ε > 0 there is δ > 0 such that d ( w ( s , t ) , w ( s 0 , t 0 ) ) < ε whenever | s     s 0 |   +   | t     t 0 | < δ . If w is continuous for each ( s , t ) D , then we say that w is continuous on D.
Definition 7 ([35]).
Let x , y E 1 and exists z E 1 , such that the following holds:
(i)
x = y z
or
(ii)
z = x ( 1 ) y .
Then, z is said to be the generalized Hukuhara difference ( g H -difference) of fuzzy numbers x and y and is given by x g H y .
Now consider x , y E 1 , then
x g H y = z
(i)
z = ( x ̲ ( r ) y ̲ ( r ) , x ¯ ( r ) y ¯ ( r ) )
or
(ii)
z = ( x ¯ ( r ) y ¯ ( r ) , x ̲ ( r ) y ̲ ( r ) ) .
The following Lemma shows the connection between the gH-difference and the Hausdor distance.
Lemma 1 ([35]).
For all u , v E 1 , we have the following:
d ( u , v ) = sup r [ 0 , 1 ] [ u ] r g H [ v ] r ,
where, for an interval [ a , b ] , the norm is [ a , b ] = max { | a | , | b | } .
Definition 8 ([36]).
Let w : D E 1 and ( x 0 , t ) D . We say that w is strongly generalized Hukuhara differentiable on ( x 0 , t ) ( g H -differentiable for short) if there exists an element w ( x 0 , t ) x E 1 such that the following holds:
(i)
For all h > 0 sufficiently small, the following gH-differences exist:
w ( x 0 + h , t ) g H w ( x 0 , t ) , w ( x 0 , t ) g H w ( x 0 h , t )
and the following limits hold (in the metric d):
lim h 0 w ( x 0 + h , t ) g H w ( x 0 , t ) h = lim h 0 w ( x 0 , t ) g H w ( x 0 h , t ) h = w ( x 0 , t ) x
(ii)
For all h > 0 sufficiently small, the following gH-differences exist:
w ( x 0 , t ) g H w ( x 0 + h , t ) , w ( x 0 h , t ) g H w ( x 0 , t ) ,
and the following limits hold (in the metric d):
lim h 0 w ( x 0 , t ) g H w ( x 0 + h , t ) h = lim h 0 w ( x 0 h , t ) g H w ( x 0 , t ) h = w ( x 0 , t ) x
Lemma 2 ([37]).
Let w : D E 1 be a continuous fuzzy-valued function and w ( x , t ) = ( w ̲ ( x , t , r ) , w ¯ ( x , t , r ) ) for all r [ 0 , 1 ] . Then, the following holds:
(i)
If w ( x , t ) is ( i ) -partial differentiable for x (i.e., w is partial differentiable for x under the meaning of Definition 8 (i)), then we have the following:
w ( x , t ) x = w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x , w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x ,
(ii)
If w ( x , t ) is ( i i ) -partial differentiable for x (i.e., w is partial differentiable for x under the meaning of Definition 8 (ii)), then we have the following:
w ( x , t ) x = w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x , w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x .
Theorem 2 [38]).
(Let w : R + E 1 and for all r [ 0 ; 1 ] .
(i)
The functions w ̲ ( t , r ) and w ¯ ( x , r ) are Riemann-integrable on [ 0 , b ] for every b 0 .
(ii)
There are constants M ̲ ( r ) > 0 and M ¯ ( r ) > 0 such that the following holds:
0 b | w ̲ ( t , r ) | d x M ̲ ( r ) , 0 b | w ¯ ( t , r ) | d x M ¯ ( r ) ,
for every b 0 .
Then, the function w ( t ) is improper fuzzy Riemann-integrable on [ 0 , ) and the following holds:
( F R ) 0 w ( t ) d t = 0 w ̲ ( t , r ) d t , 0 w ¯ ( t , r ) d t .

3. Fuzzy Sawi Transform

In this part, we give the fuzzy Sawi transform (FST) definition and its inverse. We introduce new results of FST for the fuzzy partial derivative.
Definition 9 ([21,39]).
Let w : R + E 1 be a continuous fuzzy-valued function and for σ > 0 , the function 1 σ 2 e t σ w ( t ) is improper fuzzy Riemann-integrable on [ 0 , ) . Then, we have the following:
( F R ) 0 1 σ 2 e t σ w ( t ) d t ,
which is called FST and is denoted by the following:
W ( σ ) = S [ w ( t ) ] = ( F R ) 0 1 σ 2 e t σ w ( t ) d t ,
where the variables σ are used to factor the variable t in the argument of the fuzzy-valued function.
The parametric form of FST is as follows:
S [ w ( t ) ] = ( s [ w ̲ ( t , r ) ] , s [ w ¯ ( t , r ) ] ) ,
where
s [ w ̲ ( t , r ) ] = 1 σ 2 0 e t σ w ̲ ( t , r ) d t ,
s [ w ¯ ( t , r ) ] = 1 σ 2 0 e t σ w ¯ ( t , r ) d t .
We can rewrite Equation (4) in the following form:
W ( σ ) = S [ w ( t ) ] = 1 σ ( F R ) 0 e t w ( σ t ) d t .
Definition 10 ([21,39]).
The fuzzy inverse Sawi transform can be written as the following formula:
S 1 W ( σ ) = w ( t ) = s 1 [ W ̲ ( σ , r ) ] , s 1 [ W ¯ ( σ , r ) ] ,
where the following holds:
s 1 [ W ̲ ( σ , r ) ] = 1 2 π i γ i γ + i e t σ W ̲ ( σ , r ) d σ ,
s 1 [ W ¯ ( σ , r ) ] = 1 2 π i γ i γ + i e t σ W ¯ ( σ , r ) d σ .
For all r [ 0 , 1 ] the functions W ̲ ( σ , r ) and W ¯ ( σ , r ) must be analytic functions for all σ in the region defined by the inequalities R e σ γ , where γ is the real constant to be chosen suitably.
In [39], classical Sawi transform is applied on some special functions. Some properties generated by Sawi transform are given.
(i)
Let g ( t ) = 1 for t > 0 , then s [ g ( t ) ] = 1 σ .
(ii)
Let g ( t ) = t n , where n are positive integers; then, s [ g ( t ) ] = ( n ! ) σ n 1 .
We introduce the results of FST for fuzzy partial gH-derivatives.
Theorem 3.
Let w : R + × R + E 1 be a continuous fuzzy-valued function. Suppose the functions 1 σ 2 e t σ w ( x , t ) , 1 σ 2 e t σ n w ( x , t ) x n are improper fuzzy Riemann-integrable with respect to t on [ 0 , ) . Then, we have the following:
S n w ( x , t ) x n = n x n S [ w ( x , t ) ] ,
where S [ w ( x , t ) ] denotes the FST of the function w and n N .
Proof. 
Let the function w ( x , t ) be ( i ) -differentiable. From (3) and the parametric form of FST (5), we have the following:
S n w ( x , t ) x n = ( F R ) 0 1 σ 2 e t σ n w ( x , t ) x n d t
= 0 1 σ 2 e t σ n w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x n d t , 0 1 σ 2 e t σ n w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x n d t
= n x n 0 1 σ 2 e t σ w ̲ ( x , t , r ) d t , 0 1 σ 2 e t σ w ¯ ( x , t , r ) d t = n x n S [ w ( x , t ) ] .
Theorem 4.
Let w : R + × R + E 1 be a fuzzy-valued function. The functions 1 σ 2 e t σ w ( x , t ) , 1 σ 2 e t σ n w ( x , t ) t n are improper fuzzy Riemann-integrable with respect to t on [ 0 , ) . For all t > 0 and n N , there exist continuous partial g H -derivatives to the ( n 1 ) th order with respect to t, and there exists n w ( x , t ) t n .
1. If the function w ( x , t ) is ( i ) -differentiable, then the following holds:
S n w ( x , t ) t n = s n w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t n , s n w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t n ,
where
s n w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t n = 1 σ n s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 n 1 1 σ n j + 1 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t j ,
s n w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t n = 1 σ n s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 n 1 1 σ n j + 1 j w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t j .
2. If the function w ( x , t ) is ( i i ) -differentiable then we have the following:
2.1 If n = 2 k 1 , k = 1 , 2 ,
S 2 k 1 w ( x , t ) t 2 k 1 = s 2 k 1 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k 1 , s 2 k 1 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k 1 ,
where
s 2 k 1 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k 1 = 1 σ 2 k 1 s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j j = 0 k 2 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 1 2 j + 1 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j + 1 ,
s 2 k 1 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k 1 = 1 σ 2 k 1 s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 2 j w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j j = 0 k 2 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 1 2 j + 1 w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j + 1 .
2.2 If n = 2 k , k = 1 , 2 ,
S 2 k w ( x , t ) t 2 k = s 2 k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k , s 2 k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k ,
where
s 2 k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k = 1 σ 2 k s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) + 1 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 2 j + 1 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j + 1 ,
s 2 k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k = 1 σ 2 k s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) + 1 2 j w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j j = 0 k 1 1 σ 2 ( k j ) 2 j + 1 w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j + 1 .
Proof. 
Let the function w ( x , t ) be ( i ) -differentiable. By induction, we prove Equation (11). For n = 1 , from condition (5), we have the following:
S w t ( x , t ) = ( s [ w ̲ t ( x , t , r ) ] , s w ¯ t ( x , t , r ) ) .
By using integration by parts on t, we obtain the following:
s [ w ̲ t ( x , t , r ) ] = 0 1 σ 2 e t σ w ̲ t ( x , t , r ) d t = 1 σ s [ w ̲ ( x , t , r ) ] 1 σ 2 w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) .
Let for n = k the Equation (11) holds. Hence, for n = k + 1 we obtain the following:
s k + 1 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t k + 1 = 1 σ s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t k 1 σ 2 k w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t k = 1 σ k + 1 s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k 1 ( 1 σ ) k j + 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t j 1 σ 2 k w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t k = 1 σ k + 1 s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) j = 0 k ( 1 σ ) k j + 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t j .
Let the function w ( x , t ) be ( i i ) -differentiable and n = 2 k . Then, for n = 2 , we obtain the following:
S 2 w ( x , t ) t 2 = s 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 , s 2 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 .
By using integration by parts on t we obtain the following:
s 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 = 1 σ 2 0 e t σ 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 d t = 1 σ 2 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t + 1 σ 3 0 e t σ w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t d t = 1 σ 2 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t + 1 σ 3 0 e t σ d w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = 1 σ 2 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 1 σ 3 w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) + 1 σ 4 0 e t σ w ̲ ( x , t , r ) d t = 1 σ 2 s [ w ¯ ( x , t , r ) ] 1 σ 3 w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) 1 σ 2 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t .
Let, for n = 2 k , Equation (15) hold. Hence, for n = 2 k + 2 we have the following:
S 2 k + 2 w ( x , t ) t 2 k + 2 = s 2 k + 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k + 2 , s 2 k + 2 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k + 2 .
By using integration by parts on t, we obtain the following:
s 2 k + 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k + 2 = 1 σ 2 0 e t σ 2 k + 2 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k + 2 d t = 1 σ 2 2 k + 1 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 k + 1 + 1 σ 3 0 e t σ 2 k + 1 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k + 1 d t = 1 σ 2 2 k + 1 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 k + 1 1 σ 3 2 k w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 k + 1 σ 2 1 σ 2 0 e t σ 2 k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k d t = 1 σ 2 2 k + 1 w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 k + 1 1 σ 3 2 k w ¯ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 k + 1 σ 2 s [ 2 k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 k ] = 1 2 k + 2 s [ w ̲ ( x , t , r ) ] j = 0 k 1 2 ( k + 1 j ) + 1 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j j = 0 k 1 2 ( k + 1 j ) 2 j w ̲ ( x , 0 , r ) t 2 j + 1 .

4. Sawi Decomposition Method for Solving NPFDE

In this section, we apply the combined form of FSM and the Adomian decomposition method for solving NPFDE. This equation is defined as follows:
i = 1 m a i i w ( x , t ) x i j = 0 l b j j w ( x , t ) t j k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p k w ( x , t ) x k p w ( x , t ) x p = g ( x , t ) ,
with initial conditions
j w ( x , 0 ) t j = ψ j ( x ) , j = 0 , 1 , , l 1 ,
where g , w : [ 0 , b ] × [ 0 , d ] E 1 , ψ j : [ 0 , b ] E 1 are continuous fuzzy functions, and a i , i = 1 , 2 , , m , b j , j = 1 , 2 , , l , c k p , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , p = 0 , 1 , 2 , are positive constants.
Applying the fuzzy Sawi transform to both sides of Equation (17) gives the following:
i = 1 m a i S i w ( x , t ) x i j = 0 l b j S j w ( x , t ) t j k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p S k w ( x , t ) x k p w ( x , t ) x p = S g ( x , t ) .
Let k w x k , k = 0 , 1 , 2 be positive fuzzy-valued functions. Then, the parametric form of Equation (19) is as follows:
i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i + j = 0 l b j s j w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t j + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p = s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) ,
and
i = 1 m a i s i w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x i + j = 0 l b j s j w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t j + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x p = s g ¯ ( x , t , r ) .
Case 1. Let the function w ( x , t ) be ( i ) -partial differentiable of the m-th order with respect to x and l-th order with respect to t.
We consider Equation (20). Then, from (10) and (11) and initial conditions, we have the following:
j = 0 l b j σ j s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + j = 1 l v = 0 j 1 b j σ j v + 1 ψ ̲ v ( x , r ) i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p ,
Then
s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = j = 0 l b j σ j 1 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + j = 1 l v = 0 j 1 b j σ j v + 1 ψ ̲ v ( x , r ) j = 0 l b j σ j 1 i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p .
Applying the inverse fuzzy Sawi transform to both sides of the equation, we obtain the following:
w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + j = 1 l v = 0 j 1 b j σ j v + 1 ψ ̲ v ( x , r ) s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p .
Now, apply the Adomain decomposition method (ADM). This method assume an infinite series solution for the following unknowns function:
w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = n = 0 w ̲ n ( x , t , r ) .
The nonlinear terms is represented by an infinite series of the Adomian polynomials A ̲ n k p n 0 , k = 0 , 1 , 2 , p = 0 , 1 , 2 in the following form:
k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p = n = 0 A ̲ n k p ,
where
A ̲ 0 k p = k w ̲ 0 x k p w ̲ 0 x p , A ̲ 1 k p = k w ̲ 0 x k p w ̲ 1 x p + k w ̲ 1 x k p w ̲ 0 x p , A ̲ 2 k p = k w ̲ 0 x k p w ̲ 2 x p + k w ̲ 1 x k p w ̲ 1 x p + k w ̲ 2 x k p w ̲ 0 x p ,
Substituting (23), (24) into (22) leads to the following:
n = 0 w ̲ n ( x , t , r ) = s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + j = 1 l v = 0 j 1 b j σ j v + 1 ψ ̲ v ( x , r ) s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 i = 1 m a i s n = 0 i w ̲ n ( x , t , r ) x i k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s n = 0 A ̲ n k p .
The Adomian decomposition method presents for n 0 the recursive relation as follows:
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + j = 1 l v = 0 j 1 b j σ j v + 1 ψ ̲ v ( x , r ) , w ̲ n + 1 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 j = 0 l b j σ j 1 i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ n ( x , t , r ) x i k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s A ̲ n k p .
Case 2. Let function w ( x , t ) be ( i ) -partial differentiable of the m-th order with respect to x and ( i i ) -partial differentiable of the l = 2 q -th order with respect to t. Then, the parametric form of Equation (19) is the following:
i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i + j = 0 q b 2 j s 2 j w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 j + j = 1 q b 2 j 1 s 2 j 1 w ̲ ( x , t , r ) t 2 j 1 + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p = s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) , i = 1 m a i s i w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x i + j = 0 q b 2 j s 2 j w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 j + j = 1 q b 2 j 1 s 2 j 1 w ¯ ( x , t , r ) t 2 j 1 t + k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x p = s g ¯ ( x , t , r )
Applying Theorem 4 and initial conditions, we obtain the following system:
A s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) + B s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) = s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + F ( x , σ , r ) i = 1 m a i s i w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x i k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p
A s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) + B s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) = s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + G ( x , σ , r ) i = 1 m a i s i w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x i k = 0 2 p = k 2 c k p s k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x p ,
where
A = j = 0 q b 2 j σ 2 j , B = j = 1 q b 2 j 1 σ 2 j 1 ,
F ( x , σ , r ) = j = 0 q b 2 j v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) + 1 ψ ̲ 2 v ( x , r ) + v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) ψ ¯ 2 v + 1 ( x , r ) + j = 1 q b 2 j 1 v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) ψ ¯ 2 v ( x , r ) + v = 0 j 2 1 σ 2 ( j v ) 1 ψ ̲ 2 v + 1 ( x , r ) ,
G ( x , σ , r ) = j = 0 q b 2 j v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) + 1 ψ ¯ 2 v ( x , r ) + v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) ψ ̲ 2 v + 1 ( x , r ) + j = 1 q b 2 j 1 v = 0 j 1 1 σ 2 ( j v ) ψ ̲ 2 v ( x , r ) + v = 0 j 2 1 σ 2 ( j v ) 1 ψ ¯ 2 v + 1 ( x , r ) , .
From this system, we find s w ̲ ( x , t , r ) and s w ¯ ( x , t , r ) . Analogous to Case 1, we obtain w ( x , t ) = ( w ̲ ( x , t , r ) , w ¯ ( x , t , r ) .
The Sawi decomposition method is illustrated by discussing the following example.

5. Examples

In this section, we consider the following partial fuzzy differential equation:
w t t ( x , t ) w x ( x , t ) w x x ( x , t ) = g ( x , t ) , x 0 , t 0 ,
with initial conditions
w ( x , 0 )   =   x 2 2 r , x 2 2 ( 2 r ) ,   w t ( x , 0 )   =   ( 0 , 0 ) ,   x > 0
and
g ( x , t )   =   ( r + x r 2 , 2 r + x ( 2 r ) 2 ) .
In this case, b 2 = 1 , c 12 = 1 , ψ 0 ( x ) = x 2 2 r , x 2 2 ( 2 r ) and ψ 1 ( x ) = ( 0 , 0 ) .
Assume that the function w ( x , t ) is ( i ) -differentiable of the 2-th order with respect to x.
Case 1. If w ( x , t ) is ( i ) -differentiable of the 2-th order with respect to t, using the recursive relation (25) we obtain the following:
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + s 1 1 σ ψ ̲ 0 ( x , r ) ,
w ̲ n + 1 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s A ̲ n 12 , n 0 ,
where
A ̲ 0 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 0 x x , A ̲ 1 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 1 x x + w ̲ 1 x w ̲ 0 x x , A ̲ 2 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 2 x x + w ̲ 1 x w ̲ 1 x x + w ̲ 2 x w ̲ 0 x x ,
Then,
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = t 2 2 r + x t 2 2 r 2 + x 2 2 r , w ̲ 1 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! r 3 x t 2 2 r 2 ,
w ̲ 2 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! r 3 , w ̲ 3 ( x , t , r ) = 0 ,
Analogously, we obtain the following:
w ¯ 0 ( x , t , r ) = t 2 2 ( 2 r ) + x t 2 2 ( 2 r ) 2 + x 2 2 ( 2 r ) , w ¯ 1 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! ( 2 r ) 3 x t 2 2 ( 2 r ) 2 ,
w ¯ 2 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! ( 2 r ) 3 , w ̲ 3 ( x , t , r ) = 0 ,
The series solution is, therefore, given by the following:
w ( x , t ) = x 2 2 + t 2 2 r , x 2 2 + t 2 2 ( 2 r ) .
Case 2. If w ( x , t ) is ( i i ) -differentiable of the 2-th order with respect to t, using Equations (26) and (27), we obtain the following:
1 σ 2 s ( w ̲ ( x , t , r ) ) = s ( g ( x , t , r ) ) + 1 σ 3 ψ 0 ̲ ( x , r ) s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p ,
1 σ 2 s ( w ¯ ( x , t , r ) ) = s ( g ( x , t , r ) ) + 1 σ 3 ψ 0 ¯ ( x , r ) s k w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ¯ ( x , t , r ) x p
From (29), we have the following:
s ( w ̲ ( x , t , r ) ) = σ 2 s ( g ( x , t , r ) ) + 1 σ ψ 0 ̲ ( x , r ) σ 2 s k w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x k p w ̲ ( x , t , r ) x p .
Applying the inverse fuzzy Sawi transform to both sides of the equation and by applying Adomian decomposition method, we obtain the following recursive relation:
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + s 1 1 σ ψ ̲ 0 ( x , r ) ,
w ̲ n + 1 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s A ̲ n 12 , n 0 ,
Hence, this case equivalent to Case 1.
Case 3. If w ( x , t ) is ( i ) -differentiable and w t ( x , t ) is ( i i ) -differentiable with respect to t, then S ( w t ( x , t ) ) = ( s ( w ̲ t ( x , t , r ) ) , s ( w ¯ t ( x , t , r ) ) ) , S ( w t t ( x , t ) ) = ( s ( w ¯ t t ( x , t , r ) ) , s ( w ̲ t t ( x , t , r ) ) ) .
Using (15) and (16) of Theorem 4 and the initial condition, we obtain the following recursive relation:
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s g ¯ ( x , t , r ) + s 1 1 σ ψ ̲ 0 ( x , r ) ,
w ̲ n + 1 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s A ¯ n 12 , n 0 ,
w ¯ 0 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s g ̲ ( x , t , r ) + s 1 1 σ ψ ¯ 0 ( x , r ) ,
w ¯ n + 1 ( x , t , r ) = s 1 σ 2 s A ̲ n 12 , n 0 ,
where
A ̲ 0 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 0 x x , A ̲ 1 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 1 x x + w ̲ 1 x w ̲ 0 x x ,
A ̲ 2 12 = w ̲ 0 x w ̲ 2 x x + w ̲ 1 x w ̲ 1 x x + w ̲ 2 x w ̲ 0 x x ,
A ¯ 0 12 = w ¯ 0 x w ¯ 0 x x , A ¯ 1 12 = w ¯ 0 x w ¯ 1 x x + w ¯ 1 x w ¯ 0 x x ,
A ¯ 2 12 = w ¯ 0 x w ¯ 2 x x + w ¯ 1 x w ¯ 1 x x + w ¯ 2 x w ¯ 0 x x ,
Then,
w ̲ 0 ( x , t , r ) = t 2 2 ( 2 r ) + x t 2 2 ( 2 r ) 2 + x 2 2 r , w ̲ 1 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! r 2 ( 2 r ) x t 2 2 ( 2 r ) 2 ,
w ̲ 2 ( x , t , r ) = t 4 4 ! r 2 ( 2 r ) , w ̲ 3 ( x , t , r ) = 0 ,
The series solution is, therefore, given by the following:
w ( x , t , r ) = x 2 2 r + t 2 2 ( 2 r ) , x 2 2 ( 2 r ) + t 2 2 r .

6. Conclusions and Future Work

The main idea of this work is to provide a simple method for solving the nonlinear partial fuzzy differential equations under gH-differentiability. A combined form of the fuzzy Sawi transformation method and Adomian decomposition method for these equations is applied. New results on fuzzy Sawi transform for fuzzy partial gH-derivatives are proposed. The main advantage of this method is the fact that it provides an analytical solution. Finally, an example to illustrate the proposed method is solved. The results reveal that the method is a powerful and efficient technique for solving nonlinear partial fuzzy differential equations.
For future research, we will apply the fuzzy Sawi decomposition method to fuzzy nonlinear integro-differential equations under generalized Hukuhara differentiability and the fuzzy nonlinear Fitzhugh–Nagumo–Huxley equation, which is an important model in the work of neuron axons [40]. Additionally, one can discuss the application of this method to more complex problems, such as the eigenproblem [41] and maximum likelihood estimation [42].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G., A.P.; methodology, A.G., A.P.; validation, A.G., A.P.; formal analysis, A.G., A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G., A.P.; writing—review and editing A.G., A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Elwakil, S.A.; El-labany, S.K.; Zahran, M.A.; Sabry, R. Modified extended tanh-function method for solving nonlinear partial differential equations. Phys. Lett. 2002, 299, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vasilyev, O.V.; Bowman, C. Second generation Wavelet collocation method for the solution of partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 165, 660–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, C.K.; Ho, S.H. Solving partial differential equations by two-dimensional differential transform method. Appl. Math. Comput. 1999, 106, 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gündoğdu, H.; Ömer Gözükızıl, F. Solving nonlinear partial differential equations by using Adomian decomposition method, modified decomposition method and Laplace decomposition method. MANAS J. Eng. 2017, 5, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  5. Radi, D.; Sorini, L.; Stefanini, L. On the numerical solution of ordinary, interval and fuzzy differential equations by use of F-transform. Axioms 2020, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Malinowski, M. Symmetric Fuzzy Stochastic Differential Equations with Generalized Global Lipschitz Condition. Symmetry 2020, 12, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mosavi, A.; Shokri, M.; Mansor, Z.; Noman Qasem, S.; Band, S.; Mohammadzadeh, A. Machine learning for modeling the singular Multi-Pantograph equations. Entropy 2020, 22, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Alshammari, M.; Al-Smadi, M.; Abu Arqub, O.; Hashim, I.; Almie Alias, M. Residual series representation algorithm for solving fuzzy duffing oscillator equations. Symmetry 2020, 12, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Buckley, J.J.; Feuring, T. Introduction to fuzzy partial differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1999, 105, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Allahviranloo, T.; Kermani, M.A. Numerical methods for fuzzy linear partial differential equations under new definition for derivative. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2010, 7, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mikaeilvand, N.; Khakrangin, S. Solving fuzzy partial differential equations by fuzzy two-dimensional differential transform method. Neural Comput. Appl. 2012, 21, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Osman, M.; Gong, Z.; Mustafa, A.M. Comparison of fuzzy Adomian decomposition method with fuzzy VIM for solving fuzzy heat-like and wave-like equations with variable coefficients. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Georgieva, A. Application of double fuzzy Natural transform for solving fuzzy partial equations. AIP Conf. Proc. 2021, 2333, 080006-1–080006-8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghasemi Moghaddam, R.; Abbasbandy, S.; Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. A Study on analytical solutions of the fuzzy partial differential equations. Int. J. Ind. Math. 2020, 12, 419–429. [Google Scholar]
  15. Osman, M.; Gong, Z.; Mustafa, A. A fuzzy solution of nonlinear partial differential equations. Open J. Math. Anal. 2021, 5, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Aggarwal, S.; Gupta, A.R.; Singh, D.P.; Asthana, N.; Kumar, N. Application of Laplace transform for solving population growth and decay problems. Int. J. Latest Technol. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. 2008, 7, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  17. Aggarwal, S.; Pandey, M.; Asthana, N.; Singh, D.P.; Kumar, A. Application of Mahgoub transform for solving population growth and decay problems. J. Comput. Math. Sci. 2018, 9, 1490–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, A.R. Solution of Abel’s integral equation using Mahgoub transform method. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 2019, 6, 252–260. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ojo, G.O.; Mahmudov, N.I. Aboodh transform iterative method for spatial diffusion of a biological population with fractional-order. Mathemattics 2021, 9, 155. [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh, Y.; Gill, V.; Kundu, S.; Kumar, D. On the Elzaki transform and its applications in fractional free electron laser equation. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math. 2019, 11, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mahgoub, M.M.A.; Mohand, M. The new integral transform “Sawi Transform”. Adv. Theor. Appl. Math. 2019, 14, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aggarwal, S.; Gupta, A.R. Dualities between some useful integral transforms and Sawi transform. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 5978–5982. [Google Scholar]
  23. Singh, G.P.; Aggarwal, S. Sawi transform for population growth and decay problems. Int. J. Latest Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  24. Abdul Rahman, N.A.; Ahmad, M.Z. Fuzzy Sumudu transform for solving fuzzy partial differential equations. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2016, 9, 3226–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Abaas Alshibley, S.T.; Ameera Alkiffai, N.; Athraa Albukhuttar, N. Solving a circuit system using fuzzy Aboodh transform. Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ. 2021, 12, 3317–3323. [Google Scholar]
  26. Salahshour, S.; Allahviranloo, T. Applications of fuzzy Laplace transforms. Soft Comput. 2013, 17, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adomian, G. A review of the decomposition method in applied mathematics. J. Math. Anal App. 1988, 135, 501–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Adomian, G. Solving Frontier Problems of Physics: The Decomposition Method; Kluver Academic Publishers: Boston, MA, USA, 1994; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
  29. Goetschel, R.; Voxman, W. Elementary fuzzy calculus. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986, 18, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kaufmann, A.; Gupta, M.M. Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications; Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  31. Bede, B.; Fodor, J. Product type operations between fuzzy numbers and their applications in geology. Acta Polytech. Hung. 2006, 3, 123–139. [Google Scholar]
  32. Bede, B. Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic; Springer: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, C. Multiplication Operation on Fuzzy Numbers. J. Softw. 2009, 4, 331–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Georgieva, A. Double Fuzzy Sumudu transform to solve partial Volterra fuzzy integro-differential equations. Mathematics 2020, 8, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bede, B.; Stefanini, L. Generalized differentiability of fuzzy-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2013, 230, 119–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bede, B.; Gal, S.G. Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy-number-valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2005, 151, 581–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chalco-Cano, Y.; Roman-Flores, H. On new solutions of fuzzy differential equations. Chaos Solut. Fractals 2008, 38, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, H.C. The improper fuzzy Riemann integral and its numerical integration. Inform. Sci. 1998, 111, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Higazy, M.; Aggarwal, S. Sawi transformation for system of ordinary differential equations with application. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Scott, A. FitzHugh-Nagumo (F-N) Models. In Neuroscience—A Mathematical Primer; Springer Science & Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2002; Chapter 6; pp. 122–136. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jäntschi, L. The Eigenproblem translated for alignment of molecules. Symmetry 2019, 11, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jäntschi, L.; Bálint, D.; Bolboacs, S.D. Multiple linear regressions by maximizing the likelihood under assumption of generalized Gauss-Laplace dstribution of the error. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2016, 2016, 8578156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Georgieva, A.; Pavlova, A. Fuzzy Sawi Decomposition Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Fuzzy Differential Equations. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091580

AMA Style

Georgieva A, Pavlova A. Fuzzy Sawi Decomposition Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Fuzzy Differential Equations. Symmetry. 2021; 13(9):1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Georgieva, Atanaska, and Albena Pavlova. 2021. "Fuzzy Sawi Decomposition Method for Solving Nonlinear Partial Fuzzy Differential Equations" Symmetry 13, no. 9: 1580. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091580

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop