Next Article in Journal
Transitivity on Minimum Dominating Sets of Paths and Cycles
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cauchy Problem for the Generalized Hyperbolic Novikov–Veselov Equation via the Moutard Symmetries
Previous Article in Journal
Legendre-Gould Hopper-Based Sheffer Polynomials and Operational Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
General Slow-Roll Inflation in f(R) Gravity under the Palatini Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Lagrangian Formulation of Free Arbitrary N-Extended Massless Higher Spin Supermultiplets in 4D AdS Space

Symmetry 2020, 12(12), 2052; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122052
by Ioseph L. Buchbinder 1,2 and Timofey V. Snegirev 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Symmetry 2020, 12(12), 2052; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122052
Submission received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 7 December 2020 / Accepted: 8 December 2020 / Published: 10 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry: Feature Papers 2020)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors consider massless higher spin fields in 4-dimensional anti-de Sitter space
and construct N-extended supermultiplets in the component formalism. They also show that the Lagrangian, defined as the sum of the Lagrangians of the single higher spin fields, is on-shell invariant under N-extended supersymmetry.

The paper is clearly written and is of timely interest. There are some really minor issues that the authors should adjust:
1) Supposedly, Sections 2 and 3 are reviews of higher spin fields in 4-dimensional anti-de Sitter space and of the N=1 supermultiplets, respectively. Citations to the original work should be given at the appropriate places in the text, not only in the introduction.

2) In Section 3, the supermultiplets are specified by a series of integer and half-integers numbers. Sometimes they are in decreasing order, sometimes increasing. This notation should be consistent.

3) The notation of the parameters $\alpha$ in the transformations in section 3.1 clashes with the use of $\alpha$ as multi-index.

4) "anzac" should be "ansatz", which derives from the german "Ansatz", meaning starting point.

 

Author Response

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments.

We thank the Reviewer for the comments and suggestions.

Point 1: Supposedly, Sections 2 and 3 are reviews of higher spin fields in 4-dimensional anti-de Sitter space and of the N=1 supermultiplets, respectively. Citations to the original work should be given at the appropriate places in the text, not only in the introduction.

Response 1: In the beginning of the Sections 2 and 3 we added citations to the original work. In the beginning of the Section 3 we also added additional comments on the first realization of N=1 massless higher spin supermultiplets in 4D, AdS space.

Point 2: In Section 3, the supermultiplets are specified by a series of integer and half-integers numbers. Sometimes they are in decreasing order, sometimes increasing. This notation should be consistent.

Response 2: In Section 3, we uniformly specified the supermultiplets by pair of integer and half-integer numbers in decreasing order.

Point 3:  The notation of the parameters $\alpha$ in the transformations in section 3.1 clashes with the use of $\alpha$ as multi-index.

Response 3: We substituted the notation of the parameters $\alpha$ in the supertransformations in section 3.1 for the notation $a$ to avoid the clashes with the use of $\alpha$ as multi-index. The same was done for the parameters $\beta$ and $\gamma$ in the supertransformations that was substituted for $b$ and $c$ respectively. We did this substitution everywhere in the text, not only in section 3.1.  

Point 4: "anzac" should be "ansatz", which derives from the german "Ansatz", meaning starting point.  

Response 4: It was corrected everywhere in the text.

Reviewer 2 Report

The main result is to construct actions for free supermultiplets of massless higher-spin fields, to write down and check the supersymmetry transformations and the closure of the on-shell superalgebra. The paper is clearly written and delivers interesting enough and explicit results that can be useful for the study of higher-spin theories. I recommend the paper for publication in its present form.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for considering our work and approving it for publication.

Back to TopTop