Next Article in Journal
Finite-Field Calculations of Transition Properties by the Fock Space Relativistic Coupled Cluster Method: Transitions between Different Fock Space Sectors
Next Article in Special Issue
On a Functional Integral Equation
Previous Article in Journal
Local Super Antimagic Total Labeling for Vertex Coloring of Graphs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A C0-Semigroup of Ulam Unstable Operators

1
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Str. I. Ratiu, No. 5-7, 550012 Sibiu, Romania
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Str. Memorandumului nr. 28, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Symmetry 2020, 12(11), 1844; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111844
Submission received: 24 October 2020 / Revised: 2 November 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 7 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ulam's Type Stability and Symmetries)

Abstract

:
The Ulam stability of the composition of two Ulam stable operators has been investigated by several authors. Composition of operators is a key concept when speaking about C 0 -semigroups. Examples of C 0 -semigroups formed with Ulam stable operators are known. In this paper, we construct a C 0 -semigroup ( R t ) t 0 on C [ 0 , 1 ] such that for each t > 0 , R t is Ulam unstable. Moreover, we compute the central moments of R t and establish a Voronovskaja-type formula. This enables to prove that C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] is contained in the domain D ( A ) of the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup. We raise the problem to fully characterize the domain D ( A ) .

1. Introduction

Let X be a Banach space and L : X X a bounded linear operator. We say that L is Ulam stable if there exists a constant K > 0 such that for each ε > 0 and x X with L x ε there is a u X with L u = 0 and u x K ε . If L is injective, then it is Ulam stable if and only if L 1 is bounded.
More general definitions and more general results can be found, for example, in Reference [1] [Section 2.3] and the references therein. The Ulam stability of the composition of two Ulam stable operators is investigated in Reference [2,3,4,5,6]. In Reference [2] [Example 2], a C 0 -semigroup of operators T ( t ) t 0 is presented such that for each t > 0 , T ( t ) is Ulam stable. The problem of finding a C 0 -semigroup with Ulam unstable operators was raised in Reference [2] [Section 5]. In this paper, we construct such a C 0 -semigroup ( R t ) t 0 on the Banach space C [ 0 , 1 ] of all real-valued continuous functions defined on [ 0 , 1 ] , endowed with the sup-norm. It is related to some operators introduced and investigated in Reference [7]. We prove that for each t > 0 , R t is injective and R t 1 is unbounded, and thus R t is Ulam unstable. This is done in Section 2, Section 3 and Section 4. The moments and the central moments of R t are calculated in Section 5; this enables to prove a Voronovskaja-type formula and consequently to describe the infinitesimal generator of ( R t ) t 0 on C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] . In Section 6, using some expansions in terms of Chebyshev polynomials of first kind, we find the images of some particular functions under R t . Section 7 is devoted to other properties of the semigroup. We find lim t R t f , f C [ 0 , 1 ] . Using this result, we prove that for each t > 0 , R t has the same unique invariant probability measure. Section 8 contains some conclusions and projects for further work. For the general theory of C 0 -semigroup see, for example, Reference [8]. We use the notation e k ( t ) = t k , k 0 , t [ 0 , 1 ] , and consider an empty product to be equal to 1.

2. The Operators

For n 1 , f C [ 0 , 1 ] , x [ 0 , 1 ] , let us denote
M n f ( x ) : = n π R f s i n 2 ( s + a r c s i n x ) e n s 2 d s .
The operators M n : C [ 0 , 1 ] C [ 0 , 1 ] , n 1 , were introduced and investigated in Reference [7]. Generalizing (1), let us introduce the operators R t : C [ 0 , 1 ] C [ 0 , 1 ] , t > 0 ,
R t f ( x ) : = 1 π t R f s i n 2 ( s + a r c s i n x ) e s 2 / t d s .
It is easy to see that R t is a positive linear operator and R t e 0 = e 0 , t > 0 .
Considering the Fourier coefficients of the function sin 2 m x , m N , we obtain the formula
sin 2 m x = 1 4 m 2 m m + 2 4 m j = 1 m ( 1 ) j 2 m m j cos 2 j x .
Set θ = arcsin x . Using (3), we get
R t e m ( x ) = 1 4 m 2 m m + 2 4 m π t j = 1 m ( 1 ) j 2 m m j ( cos 2 j θ ) R e s 2 t cos 2 j s d s .
Combined with
R e s 2 t cos 2 j s d s = π t e t j 2 ,
the relation (4) leads to
R t e m ( x ) = 1 4 m 2 m m + 2 4 m j = 1 m ( 1 ) j 2 m m j e t j 2 cos 2 j θ .
From cos 2 j θ + i sin 2 j θ = ( cos θ + i sin θ ) 2 j we obtain
cos 2 j θ = r = 0 j 2 j 2 r ( 1 sin 2 θ ) j r ( sin 2 θ ) r ( 1 ) r ,
which implies
cos ( 2 j arcsin x ) = r = 0 j 2 j 2 r ( 1 ) r x r ( 1 x ) j r .
From (6) and (7), we infer
R t e m ( x ) = 1 4 m 2 m m + 2 4 m j = 1 m ( 1 ) j 2 m m j e t j 2 r = 0 j 2 j 2 r ( 1 ) r x r ( 1 x ) j r .
In particular,
R t e 1 ( x ) = 1 2 + x 1 2 e t ,
R t e 2 ( x ) = 1 8 3 + 4 ( 2 x 1 ) e t + ( 8 x 2 8 x + 1 ) e 4 t , R t e 3 ( x ) = 1 32 10 + 15 e t ( 2 x 1 ) + 6 e 4 t ( 8 x 2 8 x + 1 ) + e 9 t ( 32 x 3 48 x 2 + 18 x 1 ) , R t e 4 ( t ) = 1 128 35 + 56 e t ( 2 x 1 ) + 28 e 4 t ( 8 x 2 8 x + 1 ) + 8 e 9 t 32 x 3 48 x 2 + 18 x 1 + e 16 t 128 x 4 256 x 3 + 160 x 2 32 x + 1 .
Now (9), (10) and R t e 0 = e 0 , together with Korovkin’s theorem, yield
Theorem 1.
For each f C [ 0 , 1 ] , we have
lim t 0 R t f ( x ) = f ( x ) ,
uniformly on x [ 0 , 1 ] .

3. The Semigroup

Consider the Chebyshev polynomials of first kind on [ 0 , 1 ] , namely
T m ( x ) : = cos ( m arccos ( 2 x 1 ) ) , m 0 , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Then
T m ( sin 2 y ) = ( 1 ) m cos 2 m y ,
which implies
T m ( x ) = ( 1 ) m cos ( 2 m arcsin x ) ,
and moreover,
R t T m ( x ) = ( 1 ) m π t cos ( 2 m arcsin x ) R e s 2 t cos 2 m s d s .
Using (13) and (5) we get
R t T m ( x ) = e t m 2 T m ( x ) , m 0 .
Let t > 0 , s > 0 . Then (14) shows that
R t R s T m = R t ( e s m 2 T m ) = e ( s + t ) m 2 T m = R t + s T m ,
for all m 0 .
This entails R t + s T m = R t R s T m , m 0 , and moreover R t + s p = R t R s p , for each polynomial p. Since the space of polynomial functions is dense in C [ 0 , 1 ] and R t = 1 , t > 0 , we conclude that R t + s = R t R s for all t > 0 and s > 0 .
Define R 0 to be the identity operator on C [ 0 , 1 ] . Thus ( R t ) t 0 is a semigroup of operators on C [ 0 , 1 ] . Using Theorem 1, we get:
Theorem 2.
( R t ) t 0 is a C 0 -semigroup of operators on C [ 0 , 1 ] .

4. R t Is Ulam-Unstable

Lemma 1.
For each t > 0 , R t is injective.
Proof. 
Let t > 0 and f C [ 0 , 1 ] such that R t f = 0 , that is,
+ f ( sin 2 ( s + arcsin x ) ) e s 2 / t d s = 0 , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Set g : R R , g = f sin 2 . Then g is even and π -periodic. Define
K ( a ) : = + g ( a + s ) e s 2 / t d s , a R .
Replacing s by s , we get
K ( a ) = + g ( a s ) e s 2 / t d s , a R .
As a consequence of (15), we have
K ( a ) = 0 , a 0 , π 2 .
From (16), it follows that
K ( π a ) = + g ( π a + s ) e s 2 / t d s = + g ( s a ) e s 2 / t d s = + g ( a s ) e s 2 / t d s .
Now, (17) and (18) show that K ( π a ) = K ( a ) = 0 , a 0 , π 2 . It follows immediately that K ( a ) = 0 , a [ 0 , π ] . Since g is π -periodic, K is also π -periodic, and therefore K ( a ) = 0 , a R . On the other hand, K is the convolution of g and the function s e s 2 / t , s R . Titchmarsch Theorem implies that g = 0 on R , and so f = 0 on R . □
Theorem 3.
For each t > 0 , R t is Ulam unstable.
Proof. 
From Lemma 1 and (14), we deduce that R t 1 T m = e t m 2 T m , m = 0 , 1 , . It follows that R t 1 is unbounded, and so R t is Ulam unstable. □

5. The Moments of the Operators R t

Remember that R t : C [ 0 , 1 ] C [ 0 , 1 ] , t > 0 ,
R t f ( x ) = 1 π t R f ( s i n 2 ( s + arcsin x ) ) e s 2 / t d s .
Let M t , m ( x ) be the central moment of order m 0 of the operator R t , that is,
M t , m ( x ) : = R t ( e 1 x e 0 ) m ( x ) = 1 π t R s i n 2 ( s + arcsin x ) x m e s 2 t d s = 1 π t R ( 1 2 x ) sin s + 2 x ( 1 x ) cos s m ( s i n m s ) e s 2 t d s = 1 π t k = 0 m m k ( 1 2 x ) k 2 x ( 1 x ) m k R sin m + k s cos m k s e s 2 t d s .
We need also the formula
1 π t R s 2 p e s 2 t d s = ( 2 p 1 ) ! ! t 2 p , t > 0 , p 0 .
For m = 2 j , we get
M t , 2 j ( x ) = k = 0 2 j 2 j k ( 1 2 x ) k 2 x ( 1 x ) 2 j k 1 π t R sin 2 j + k s cos 2 j k s e s 2 t d s .
Using the McLaurin series for sin 2 j + k s cos 2 j k s , we have
R sin 2 j + k s cos 2 j k s e s 2 t d s = R s 2 j + k + terms with higher powers of s e s 2 t d s .
From (19)–(21), it follows that
M t , 2 j ( x ) = 2 x ( 1 x ) 2 j ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! t 2 j + terms with higher powers of t .
This yields
lim t 0 t j M t , 2 j ( x ) = 2 j ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! x ( 1 x ) j .
Similarly, for m = 2 j 1 we have
M t , 2 j 1 ( x ) = k = 1 2 j 1 2 j 1 k ( 1 2 x ) k 2 x ( 1 x ) 2 j 1 k × 1 π t R sin 2 j 1 + k s cos 2 j 1 k s e s 2 t d s = ( 2 j 1 ) ( 1 2 x ) 2 x ( 1 x ) 2 j 2 t 2 j ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! + terms with higher powers of t .
Consequently,
lim t 0 t j M t , 2 j 1 ( x ) = ( 2 j 1 ) ( 2 j 1 ) ! ! 2 j 2 ( 1 2 x ) x ( 1 x ) j 1 .
By a direct calculation,
M t , 0 ( x ) = 1 ,
M t , 1 ( x ) = 1 2 ( 1 e t ) ( 1 2 x ) ,
M t , 2 ( x ) = ( 2 e t e 4 t 1 ) x ( 1 x ) + 1 8 ( 3 4 e t + e 4 t ) .
From (25) and (26), or from (22) and (23) with j = 1 , we derive
lim t 0 M t , 1 ( x ) t = 1 2 ( 1 2 x ) ,
lim t 0 M t , 2 ( x ) t = 2 x ( 1 x ) .
Using Sikkema’s classical result [9], combined with (22)–(24), (27), (28), we get:
Theorem 4.
For each f C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] , the following Voronovskaja type formula is valid
lim t 0 R t f ( x ) f ( x ) t = x ( 1 x ) f ( x ) + 1 2 x f ( x ) ,
uniformly on x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Let ( A , D ( A ) ) be the infinitesimal generator of the semigroup ( R t ) t 0 . From Theorem 4, we infer:
Corollary 1.
C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] D ( A ) , and
A f ( x ) = x ( 1 x ) f ( x ) + 1 2 x f ( x ) , f C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] , x [ 0 , 1 ] .

6. Applications

According to (11),
cos ( 2 k arcsin x ) = ( 1 ) k T k ( x ) .
Let f C [ 0 , 1 ] . Then f sin 2 is even and π -periodic on R .
Theorem 5.
Suppose that f sin 2 has the Fourier expansion
f ( sin 2 α ) = k = 0 a 2 k cos 2 k α , α R .
Then R t f ( x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k a 2 k e t k 2 T k ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Proof. 
Setting x = sin 2 α , we get
f ( x ) = k = 0 a 2 k cos ( 2 k arcsin x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Now, (30) implies
f ( x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k a 2 k T k ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Remember also that (see (14)),
R t T k = e t k 2 T k , t 0 , k 0 .
From (31) and (32), we infer
R t f ( x ) = k = 0 ( 1 ) k a 2 k e t k 2 T k ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
and this concludes the proof. □
Example 1.
Let f ( x ) = e 1 / 2 ( x ) = x . Then we can use the Fourier expansion
f ( sin 2 x ) = | sin x | = 2 π 4 π k = 1 1 4 k 2 1 cos 2 k x .
We get from (33)
R t e 1 / 2 ( x ) = 2 π 4 π k = 1 ( 1 ) k 4 k 2 1 e t k 2 T k ( x ) .
For t = 0 , (34) reduces to
x = 2 π 4 π k = 1 ( 1 ) k 4 k 2 1 T k ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Example 2.
Let f ( x ) = arcsin e 1 / 2 ( x ) . Then, for x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
f ( sin 2 x ) = arcsin | sin x | = π 4 2 π k = 1 1 ( 2 k 1 ) 2 cos 2 ( 2 k 1 ) x .
Now, (33) yields
R t arcsin e 1 / 2 ( x ) = π 4 + 2 π k = 1 1 ( 2 k 1 ) 2 e t ( 2 k 1 ) 2 T 2 k 1 ( x ) ,
and for t = 0 , (35) reduces to
arcsin x = π 4 + 2 π k = 1 1 ( 2 k 1 ) 2 T 2 k 1 ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Example 3.
Let f ( x ) = arccos ( 2 x 1 ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] . Using the Fourier expansion
θ = π 2 4 π n = 0 cos ( 2 n + 1 ) θ ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 , θ [ 0 , π ] ,
with θ = arccos ( 2 x 1 ) , we get
f ( x ) = π 2 4 π n = 0 T 2 n + 1 ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 .
Together with (32), this shows that
R t f ( x ) = π 2 4 π n = 0 e t ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 T 2 n + 1 ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 .
Example 4.
Let f ( x ) = arccos ( 2 x 1 ) , g ( x ) = arcsin ( 2 x 1 ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] . Then f ( x ) + g ( x ) = π 2 , and using the result from Example 3, we obtain
R t g ( x ) = 4 π n = 0 e t ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 T 2 n + 1 ( x ) ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 .
Example 5.
Let f ( x ) = x ( 1 x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] . Then
f ( x ) = 1 π 2 π n = 1 T 2 n ( x ) 4 n 2 1 .
Therefore,
R t f ( x ) = 1 π 2 π n = 1 e 4 t n 2 T 2 n ( x ) 4 n 2 1 .
Example 6.
For f ( x ) = arctan ( 2 x 1 ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] , we get
f ( x ) = 2 n = 1 ( 1 ) n ( 2 1 ) 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 T 2 n + 1 , x [ 0 , 1 ] .
Then
R t f ( x ) = 2 n = 1 ( 1 ) n ( 2 1 ) 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 e t ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 T 2 n + 1 ( x ) .

7. Properties of the Semigroup ( R t ) t 0

Theorem 6.
For each f C [ 0 , 1 ] ,
lim t R t f = 2 π 0 1 f ( x ) d arcsin x e 0 .
Proof. 
It suffices to prove (36) for f = T m , m 0 . For m = 0 , it reduces to e 0 = e 0 . For m 1 ,
lim t R t T m = lim t e t m 2 T m = 0 ,
and
2 π 0 1 T m ( x ) d arcsin x = 1 π 0 1 T m ( x ) T 0 ( x ) x ( 1 x ) d x = 0 .
Theorem 7.
The probability measure μ on [ 0 , 1 ] given by
d μ ( x ) = 1 π 1 x ( 1 x ) d x
is invariant with respect to all R t , t > 0 . It is the unique probability measure with this property.
Remark 1.
Theorem 7 asserts that for each t > 0 the dynamical system ( C [ 0 , 1 ] , R t ) is uniquely ergodic, that is, it has a unique invariant probability measure μ, described by (37).
Proof. 
We have to prove that
0 1 R t f ( x ) d μ ( x ) = 0 1 f ( x ) d μ ( x ) , f C [ 0 , 1 ] .
It suffices to prove (38) for f = T m , m 0 . For m = 0 , (38) follows from R t T 0 = T 0 . For m 1 , we have
0 1 R t T m ( x ) d μ ( x ) = e m 2 t π 0 1 T m ( x ) T 0 ( x ) x ( 1 x ) d x = 0 = 0 1 T m ( x ) d μ ( x ) .
Thus (38) is proved. If ν is also a probability measure invariant with respect to all R t , t > 0 , then using Theorem 6 we can write
0 1 f ( x ) d ν ( x ) = lim t 0 1 R t f ( x ) d ν ( x ) = 0 1 lim t R t f ( x ) d ν ( x ) = 0 1 2 π 0 1 f ( s ) d arcsin s d ν ( x ) = 2 π 0 1 f ( s ) d arcsin s = 0 1 f ( x ) d μ ( x ) .
Thus ν = μ , and the proof is complete. □

8. Conclusions and Further Work

Composition of operators is a core concept when speaking about C 0 -semigroups. The Ulam stability of the composition of two Ulam stable operators was studied in several papers. Some problems were raised in Reference [2]. In this paper, we solve one of these problems. More precisely, we construct a C 0 -semigroup ( R t ) t 0 on C [ 0 , 1 ] such that for each t > 0 , R t is Ulam unstable. Moreover, we investigate the properties of this C 0 -semigroup. In particular, we consider its infinitesimal generator ( A , D ( A ) ) and prove that C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] is included in the domain D ( A ) . This means that if f C 2 [ 0 , 1 ] , then the Cauchy problem
u ( t , x ) t = A u ( t , x ) , t 0 , u ( 0 , x ) = f ( x ) , x [ 0 , 1 ] ,
has a unique solution, namely u ( t , x ) = R t f ( x ) . Of course, this is true for an arbitrary f D ( A ) (see, e.g., Reference [8]) and from this point of view, it would be useful to have an explicit description of the domain D ( A ) . To this end we intend to consider the C 0 -semigroup ( R t ) t 0 in the more general framework presented in Reference [7].

Author Contributions

These authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project financed by Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu & Hasso Plattner Foundation research grants LBUS-IRG-2020-06.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very greateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brzdek, J.; Popa, D.; Raşa, I.; Xu, B. Ulam stability of operators. In Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications, 1st ed.; Academic Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Acu, A.M.; Raşa, I. Ulam Stability for the Composition of Operators. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hirasawa, G.; Miura, T. Hyers-Ulam stability of a closed operator in a Hilbert space. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2006, 43, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Brzdek, J.; Popa, D.; Raşa, I. Hyers-Ulam stability with respect to gauges. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2017, 453, 620–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Miura, T.; Miyajima, S.; Takahasi, S.E. Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential operator with constant coefficients. Math. Nachr. 2003, 258, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Popa, D.; Raşa, I. On the stability of some classical operators from approximation theory. Exp. Math. 2013, 31, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Altomare, F.; Rasa, I. On some classes of diffusion equations and related approximation problems. In Trends and Applications in Constructive Approximation; International Series of Numerical Mathematics; Szabados, J., de Bruin, M.G., Mache, D.H., Eds.; Birkhauser: Basel, Switzerland, 2005; Volume 151, pp. 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pazy, A. Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sikkema, P.C. On some linear positive operators. Indag. Math. 1970, 32, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acu, A.M.; Raşa, I. A C0-Semigroup of Ulam Unstable Operators. Symmetry 2020, 12, 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111844

AMA Style

Acu AM, Raşa I. A C0-Semigroup of Ulam Unstable Operators. Symmetry. 2020; 12(11):1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acu, Ana Maria, and Ioan Raşa. 2020. "A C0-Semigroup of Ulam Unstable Operators" Symmetry 12, no. 11: 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop