Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Regional Disparities of Urban Resilience in China’s Mining Cities
Previous Article in Journal
From Electricity-Informed Occupancy Dynamics to Rural Shrinkage Mechanisms: An Evidence-Driven, Explainable Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Holism and Territorial Spatial Planning Reform in China: Evolutionary Challenges and Governance Measures Under Chinese-Style Modernization

1
School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(2), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020347
Submission received: 8 February 2026 / Revised: 17 February 2026 / Accepted: 18 February 2026 / Published: 20 February 2026

Abstract

Amid the accelerating agenda of Chinese-style modernization, China’s territorial spatial planning is undergoing a major transition and facing mounting challenges, while the theoretical foundations that support this transition remain at an early stage and require further integration. Drawing on holism, this paper operationalizes a cognition–relation–testing governance chain and develops an analytical framework to explain the institutional evolution and governance performance of China’s territorial spatial planning. Using clause- and paragraph-level evidence units from policy and planning texts, the study reviews and compares five historical stages of China’s territorial spatial planning, emphasizing simultaneous consistency across the three levels and a replicable diagnostic procedure. Building on this analysis, the paper proposes a holistic coordination pathway oriented toward modernization governance: it anchors implementation in auditable trade-off rules and executable boundary instruments, strengthens collaboration and conflict-adjudication procedures, and embeds a closed loop of “evaluation–adjustment–accountability” across the full planning life cycle, thereby providing an analytical approach and indicator toolkit for assessing the degree of governance closure in planning practice.
Keywords: holism; Chinese-style modernization; territorial spatial planning; bottlenecks; governance measures holism; Chinese-style modernization; territorial spatial planning; bottlenecks; governance measures

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, C.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Zeng, P. Holism and Territorial Spatial Planning Reform in China: Evolutionary Challenges and Governance Measures Under Chinese-Style Modernization. Land 2026, 15, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020347

AMA Style

Hong C, Zhang Z, Zhu X, Zeng P. Holism and Territorial Spatial Planning Reform in China: Evolutionary Challenges and Governance Measures Under Chinese-Style Modernization. Land. 2026; 15(2):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Chenyuxuan, Zichun Zhang, Xigang Zhu, and Peng Zeng. 2026. "Holism and Territorial Spatial Planning Reform in China: Evolutionary Challenges and Governance Measures Under Chinese-Style Modernization" Land 15, no. 2: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020347

APA Style

Hong, C., Zhang, Z., Zhu, X., & Zeng, P. (2026). Holism and Territorial Spatial Planning Reform in China: Evolutionary Challenges and Governance Measures Under Chinese-Style Modernization. Land, 15(2), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15020347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop