Next Article in Journal
Understanding Vulnerability to Natural Hazards of Displaced Persons in Cox’s Bazar
Previous Article in Journal
Expansion of Lifestyle Blocks in Peri-Urban New Zealand: A Review of the Implications for Environmental Management and Landscape Design
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting the Contested Case of Belgrade Waterfront Transformation: From Unethical Urban Governance to Landscape Degradation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model

1
Department of Urban and Transportation Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Landscape Architecture, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52725, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(7), 1449; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071449
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 8 July 2025 / Accepted: 10 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025

Abstract

This study proposes a novel method to assess urban park accessibility by incorporating perceived utility based on both park area and distance. Departing from conventional models that treat accessibility as a function of geometric proximity alone, we define park utility as a distance-discounted benefit of park area, thereby allowing for a more behaviorally grounded measure. A customized discounting function is introduced, where larger park sizes proportionally reduce perceived travel cost, and walking speed adjustments are applied based on demographic user profiles (children, adults, and older adults). The methodology was implemented using a Python-based v.3.12.9 geospatial workflow with network-based distance calculations between 18,614 census block groups and all urban parks in Seoul. Population-weighted utility scores were computed by integrating park size, distance, and age-specific mobility adjustments. The results reveal significant intra-urban disparities, with a citywide deficit of 4,066,046 m in population-weighted distance, particularly in areas with large populations but insufficient proximity to high-utility parks. Simulation analyses of 30 candidate sites demonstrate that strategic park placement can yield substantial utility improvements (maximum gain: 493,436 m), while indiscriminate expansion may not. These findings offer spatial decision support for optimizing limited public resources in urban green infrastructure planning and underscore the need to consider both park scale and user-specific walking behavior in evaluating accessibility.
Keywords: perceived accessibility; distance discounting; urban park utility; spatial equity; Seoul perceived accessibility; distance discounting; urban park utility; spatial equity; Seoul

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, G.; Kang, Y. Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model. Land 2025, 14, 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071449

AMA Style

Lee G, Kang Y. Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model. Land. 2025; 14(7):1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071449

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Gyoungju, and Youngeun Kang. 2025. "Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model" Land 14, no. 7: 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071449

APA Style

Lee, G., & Kang, Y. (2025). Evaluating Urban Park Utility in Seoul: A Distance-to-Area Discounting Model. Land, 14(7), 1449. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071449

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop