Benthic–Pelagic Coupling Mediated by a Native Freshwater Mussel (Diplodon chilensis) in a Southern South American Lake
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Field Mesocosm Experiments
2.3. Sediment and Benthic Invertebrate Sampling and Analyses
2.4. Environmental Monitoring During Experiments
2.5. Statistical Analyses
2.6. Lake-Scale Upscaling
2.6.1. Deposition Rate Estimation
2.6.2. Spatial Scaling
2.7. Laboratory Filtration Rates and Biological Turnover Estimation
3. Results
3.1. Water-Column Quality During the Experimental Period
3.2. Sediment Biogeochemistry: Effects of Diplodon chilensis
3.2.1. Organic Matter
3.2.2. Total Nitrogen
3.2.3. Total Phosphorus
3.3. Zoobenthic Responses to D. chilensis
3.3.1. Macrofaunal Richness
3.3.2. Macrofaunal Abundance
3.3.3. Meiofaunal Abundance
3.4. Individual Filtration Rates Under Controlled Conditions
3.5. Biodeposition and Filtration Capacity at the Lake Scale
4. Discussion
4.1. Diplodon chilensis as a Multiscale Driver of Downward Benthic–Pelagic Coupling
4.2. Biodeposition as a Driver of Element-Specific Sediment Enrichment
4.3. Size-Structured Benthic Responses: Macroinvertebrates vs. Meiofauna
4.4. Environmental Context and Boundary Conditions
4.5. Implications for Ecosystem Functioning and Conservation
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| Chl-a | Chlorophyll-a |
| CTSI | Carlson Trophic State Index |
| Cond | Electrical conductivity |
| DO | Dissolved oxygen |
| FR | Filtration rate |
| LSP | Laguna Chica de San Pedro |
| OM | Organic matter |
| TP | Total phosphorus |
| Temp | Temperature |
| TN | Total nitrogen |
References
- Strayer, D.L.; Caraco, N.F.; Cole, J.J.; Findlay, S.; Pace, M.L. Transformation of Freshwater Ecosystems by Bivalves: A case study of zebra mussels in the Hudson River. BioScience 1999, 49, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughn, C.C.; Hakenkamp, C.C. The functional role of burrowing bivalves in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw. Biol. 2001, 46, 1431–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cloern, J.E. Does the benthos control phytoplankton biomass in South San Francisco Bay? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1982, 9, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dame, R.F. Ecology of Marine Bivalves: An Ecosystem Approach; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamann, L.; Blanke, A. Suspension feeders: Diversity, principles of particle separation and biomimetic potential. J. R. Soc. Interface 2022, 19, 20210741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughn, C.C.; Nichols, S.J.; Spooner, D.E. Community and foodweb ecology of freshwater mussels. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 2008, 27, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaughn, C.C. Ecosystem services provided by freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 2018, 810, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zieritz, A.; Sousa, R.; Aldridge, D.C.; Douda, K.; Esteves, E.; Ferreira-Rodríguez, N.; Mageroy, J.H.; Nizzoli, D.; Osterling, M.; Reis, J.; et al. A global synthesis of ecosystem services provided and disrupted by freshwater bivalve molluscs. Biol. Rev. 2022, 97, 1967–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marroni, S.; Stábile, F.; González-Bergonzoni, I.; de Mello, F.T.; Mazzeo, N.; Iglesias, C. Filtration and pe-dal-feeding contribution to the biomass of the freshwater bivalve D. parallelopipedon: Evidence from stable isotopes analysis. Hydrobiologia 2026, 853, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, C.L.; First, M.R.; Covich, A.P.; Opsahl, S.P.; Golladay, S.W. Suspended material availability and filtra-tion–biodeposition processes performed by a native and invasive bivalve species in streams. Hydrobiologia 2011, 667, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prestes, J.G.; Pedroso, C.R.; de Siqueira Pereira, H.; Miiller, N.O.; Rennó Braga, R.; Vitule, J.R. Filtration, ingestion, and food selectivity in the freshwater bivalves D. parodizi (native) and Corbicula fluminea (invasive). Hydrobiologia 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinhart, G.S.; Likens, G.E.; Soto, D. Physiological indicators of nutrient deficiency in phytoplankton in southern Chilean lakes. Hydrobiologia 2002, 489, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wetzel, R.G. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Marescaux, J.; Falisse, E.; Lorquet, J.; Doninck, K.V.; Beisel, J.; Descy, J. Assessing filtration rates of exotic bivalves: Dependence on algae concentration and seasonal factors. Hydrobiologia 2016, 777, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parada, E.; Peredo, S.; Lara, G.; Valdebenito, I. Growth, age and life span of D. chilensis. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1989, 115, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenas, L.; Brugni, N. Características poblacionales y ciclo de vida de D. chilensis (d’Orbigny, 1835) (Hyriidae, Bivalvia) en el lago Gutiérrez (Patagonia, Argentina). Ecol. Austral 2002, 12, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
- Valdovinos, C.; Pedreros, P. Geographic variations in shell growth rates of the mussel D. chilensis from tem-perate lakes of Chile: Implications for biodiversity conservation. Limnologica 2007, 37, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Jones, C.G.; Lawton, J.H.; Shachak, M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soto, D.; Mena, G. Filter feeding by the freshwater mussel D. chilensis as a biocontrol of salmon farming eutrophication. Aquaculture 1999, 171, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocchetta, I.; Lomovasky, B.; Yusseppone, M.S.; Sabatini, S.; Bieczynski, F.; Ríos de Molina, M.C.; Luquet, C. Growth, abundance, morphometric and metabolic parameters of three populations of D. chilensis subject to different levels of natural and anthropogenic organic matter input in a glacial lake of North Patagonia. Limnologica 2014, 44, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marroni, S.; Mazzeo, N.; Iglesias, C. Effects of temperature and food availability on the filtration and excretion rates of D. parallelopipedon (Hyriidae). Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2021, 106, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterner, R.W.; Elser, J.J. Ecological Stoichiometry; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanni, M.J. Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33, 341–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zieritz, A.; Chan, W.N.; McGowan, S.; Gibbins, C.N. High rates of biodeposition and N-excretion indicate strong functional effects of mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) in certain anthropogenic tropical freshwater habitats. Hydrobiologia 2020, 848, 3153–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urrutia, R.; Sabbe, K.; Cruces, F.; Pozo, K.; Becerra, J.; Araneda, A.; Vyverman, W.; Parra, O. Paleolimnological studies of Laguna Chica of San Pedro (VIII Region): Diatoms, hydrocarbons and fatty acid records. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2000, 73, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Centro EULA-Chile. Diagnóstico ambiental de las lagunas de San Pedro; Technical report; Universidad de Concepción: Concepción, Chile, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Urrutia, R.; Cisternas, M.; Araneda, A.; Retamal, O.; Mardones, M. Caracterización morfométrica y sedimentológica de cinco lagos costeros de la VIII Región, Chile. Rev. Geogr. Chile Terra Aust. 2000, 45, 7–24. [Google Scholar]
- Parra, O.; Valdovinos, C.; Urrutia, R.; Cisternas, M.; Habit, E.; Mardones, M. Caracterización y tendencias tróficas de cinco lagos costeros de Chile Central. Limnética 2003, 22, 51–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cisternas, M.; Torres, L.; Urrutia, R.; Araneda, A.; Parra, O. Environmental comparison, through sedimentary records, between pre-Hispanic and current conditions of a lacustrine system. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2000, 73, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdovinos, C.; Balboa, C. Cercarial dermatitis and lake eutrophication in south-central Chile. Epidemiol. Infect. 2007, 136, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spooner, D.E.; Vaughn, C.C. Context-dependent effects of freshwater mussels on stream benthic communities. Freshw. Biol. 2006, 51, 1016–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCasker, N.; Humphries, P. Hyriid mussels (Unionoida) enhance benthic organic matter and meiofauna densities in a temperate Australian river. Freshw. Biol. 2021, 66, 936–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutiérrez, J.L.; Jones, C.G.; Strayer, D.L.; Iribarne, O.O. Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: The role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 2003, 101, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurlbert, S.H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 1984, 54, 187–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, M.L. Soil Chemical Analysis: Advanced Course, 2nd ed.; UW–Madison Libraries Parallel Press: Madison, WI, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association (APHA); American Water Works Association (AWWA); Water Environment Federation (WEF). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 24th ed.; APHA Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Carlson, R.E. A trophic state index for lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1977, 22, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quade, D. Using Weighted Rankings in the Analysis of Complete Blocks with Additive Block Effects. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1979, 74, 680–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinn, G.P.; Keough, M.J. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Rosenthal, R. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, 2nd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Fritz, C.O.; Morris, P.E.; Richler, J.J. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. J. Exp. Psychol. Genera 2012, 141, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakens, D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 2013, 4, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Riisgård, H.U. On measurement of filtration rates in bivalves—The stony road to reliable data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001, 211, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brouwer, S.; Humphries, P.; Holland, A.; McCasker, N. Effect of suspended sediment concentration on the clearance and biodeposition rates of an Australian freshwater mussel (Hyriidae). Freshw. Biol. 2023, 68, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuentealba, C.; Henríquez, O. Rol de las poblaciones de Diplodon chilensis (Gray, 1828) (Bivalvia: Hyriidae) en el estado trófico de la Laguna Chica de San Pedro (Chile). Comunic. Soc. Malacol. Urug 2009, 9, 195–200. [Google Scholar]
- Kohlberg, G.; Herbst, A.; Niedzwiedz, G.; Woelfl, S.; Nimptsch, J.; Schories, D. Time lapse photography with two different camera systems for in situ observation of the bivalve Diplodon chilensis (Gray, 1828) in a southern Chilean lake. Gayana 2019, 83, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes-Lima, M.; Burlakova, L.E.; Karatayev, A.Y.; Mehler, K.; Seddon, M.; Sousa, R. Conservation of freshwater bivalves at the global scale. Hydrobiologia 2018, 810, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, C.L.; Vaughn, C.C. Biogeochemical hotspots: Temporal and spatial scaling of the impact of freshwater mussels on ecosystem function. Freshw. Biol. 2015, 60, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kautsky, N.; Evans, S. Role of biodeposition by Mytilus edulis in the circulation of matter and nutrients in a Baltic coastal ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1987, 38, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giles, H.; Pilditch, C.A. Effects of mussel (Perna canaliculus) biodeposition on benthic respiration and nutrient fluxes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2006, 150, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKindsey, C.W.; Archambault, P.; Callier, M.D.; Olivier, F. Influence of suspended and off-bottom mussel culture on the sea bottom and benthic habitats: A review. Can. J. Zool. 2011, 89, 622–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haag, W.R.; Williams, J.D. Biodiversity on the brink: An assessment of conservation strategies for North American freshwater mussels. Hydrobiologia 2014, 735, 45–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prins, T.C.; Smaal, A.C. The role of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis in the cycling of nutrients in the Oosterschelde estuary. Hydrobiologia 1994, 282, 413–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buelow, C.A.; Waltham, N.J. Restoring tropical coastal wetland water quality: Ecosystem service provisioning by a native freshwater bivalve. Aquat. Sci. 2020, 82, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, C.L.; Capps, K.A.; Rugenski, A.T.; Vanni, M.J. Consumer-driven nutrient dynamics in freshwater ecosystems: From individuals to ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 2017, 92, 2003–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elser, J.J.; Dobberfuhl, D.R.; MacKay, N.A.; Schampel, J.H. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry. BioScience 1996, 46, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pearson, T.H.; Rosenberg, R. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 1978, 16, 229–311. [Google Scholar]
- Howard, J.K.; Cuffey, K.M. The functional role of native freshwater mussels in the fluvial benthic environment. Freshw. Biol. 2006, 51, 460–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simeone, D.; Tagliaro, C.H.; Beasley, C.R. Filter and deposit: A potential role of freshwater mussels in ecosystem functioning associated with enhanced macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in a Neotropical river. Hydrobiologia 2021, 848, 4211–4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giere, O. Meiobenthology: The Microscopic Motile Fauna of Aquatic Sediments, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orihel, D.M.; BauLaguna Chica de San Pedro, H.M.; Casson, N.J.; North, R.L.; Parsons, C.T.; Seckar, D.C.M.; Venkiteswaran, J.J. Internal phosphorus loading in Canadian fresh waters: A critical review and data analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017, 74, 2005–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, G.W.; Zieritz, A.; Aldridge, D.C. Ecosystem engineering by mussels supports biodiversity and water clarity in a heavily polluted lake in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Freshw. Sci. 2016, 35, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, W.K.; Smith, V.H. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and eutrophication in streams. Inland Waters 2016, 6, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




| Experiment Number (and Season) | Secchi (m) | Temp (°C) | DO (mg·L−1) | pH | Cond (µS·cm−1) | TN (mg·L−1) | TP (mg·L−1) | Chl-a (µg·L−1) | CTSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (W23) | 9.6 | 10.6 ± 0.0 | 11.2 ± 0.0 | 6.9 ± 0.0 | 89.0 ± 0.2 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.024 ± 0.027 | 0.65 ± 0.36 | 34.7 |
| 2 (Sp23) | 8.8 | 15.5 ± 1.8 | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 90.6 ± 4.2 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.006 ± 0.000 | 1.22 ± 0.80 | 30.4 |
| 3 (Su23–24) | 7.9 | 20.5 ± 3.0 | 7.7 ± 1.1 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 103.3 ± 9.0 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.009 ± 0.004 | 0.80 ± 0.60 | 31.7 |
| 4 (A24) | 5.2 | 15.5 ± 1.9 | 9.5 ± 0.6 | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 91.1 ± 4.3 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.006 ± 0.000 | 1.15 ± 0.80 | 32.7 |
| 5 (W24) | 9.6 | 10.7 ± 0.0 | 11.4 ± 0.0 | 6.9 ± 0.0 | 89.1 ± 0.2 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.024 ± 0.024 | 0.64 ± 0.33 | 34.6 |
| 6 (Sp024) | 8.3 | 15.6 ± 2.2 | 9.7 ± 0.5 | 7.7 ± 0.3 | 90.9 ± 4.4 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.007 ± 0.001 | 1.08 ± 0.80 | 31.0 |
| Experiment | C1 | C2 | Tr | F | p | Effect Size (r) (Tr vs. C1) | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM (%) | |||||||
| 1 | 0.261 ± 0.080 | 0.256 ± 0.100 | 0.490 ± 0.080 | 6.71 | 0.030 | 0.913 | 89.6 |
| 2 | 0.635 ± 0.153 | 0.612 ± 0.085 | 0.775 ± 0.233 | 2.40 | 0.172 | 0.913 | 24.3 |
| 3 | 0.737 ± 0.125 | 0.769 ± 0.108 | 0.959 ± 0.117 | 6.37 | 0.033 | 0.913 | 27.4 |
| 4 | 0.643 ± 0.097 | 0.662 ± 0.099 | 0.827 ± 0.101 | 6.07 | 0.036 | 0.913 | 26.7 |
| 5 | 0.251 ± 0.042 | 0.254 ± 0.069 | 0.441 ± 0.065 | 6.17 | 0.035 | 0.913 | 74.7 |
| 6 | 0.645 ± 0.037 | 0.650 ± 0.081 | 0.818 ± 0.136 | 4.21 | 0.072 | 0.913 | 26.3 |
| TN (mg·g−1) | |||||||
| 1 | 0.349 ± 0.107 | 0.343 ± 0.096 | 0.663 ± 0.153 | 6.04 | 0.037 | 0.913 | 91.6 |
| 2 | 0.635 ± 0.221 | 0.695 ± 0.163 | 1.052 ± 0.355 | 5.72 | 0.041 | 0.913 | 58.2 |
| 3 | 0.787 ± 0.113 | 0.792 ± 0.110 | 1.135 ± 0.167 | 5.67 | 0.041 | 0.913 | 43.8 |
| 4 | 0.731 ± 0.048 | 0.696 ± 0.106 | 0.962 ± 0.099 | 5.10 | 0.051 | 0.913 | 34.8 |
| 5 | 0.339 ± 0.052 | 0.336 ± 0.048 | 0.633 ± 0.105 | 24.91 | 0.001 | 0.913 | 87.5 |
| 6 | 0.658 ± 0.124 | 0.702 ± 0.139 | 0.901 ± 0.279 | 12.18 | 0.008 | 0.913 | 32.5 |
| TP (mg·g−1) | |||||||
| 1 | 0.258 ± 0.041 | 0.277 ± 0.035 | 0.304 ± 0.071 | 4.28 | 0.067 | 0.730 | 13.6 |
| 2 | 0.397 ± 0.033 | 0.386 ± 0.017 | 0.389 ± 0.036 | 0.25 | 0.788 | 0.182 | –0.6 |
| 3 | 0.422 ± 0.049 | 0.428 ± 0.052 | 0.461 ± 0.035 | 1.11 | 0.393 | 0.091 | 8.4 |
| 4 | 0.385 ± 0.022 | 0.368 ± 0.036 | 0.414 ± 0.049 | 1.81 | 0.238 | 0.091 | 10.2 |
| 5 | 0.234 ± 0.061 | 0.254 ± 0.043 | 0.295 ± 0.045 | 6.37 | 0.032 | 0.500 | 20.9 |
| 6 | 0.410 ± 0.042 | 0.407 ± 0.044 | 0.354 ± 0.084 | 3.86 | 0.082 | 0.500 | –13.6 |
| Experiment | C1 | C2 | Tr | F | p | Effect size (r) (Tr vs. C1) | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macrofaunal richness (N taxa) | |||||||
| 1 | 2.92 ± 0.67 | 3.58 ± 1.00 | 5.92 ± 1.68 | 10.69 | 0.011 | 0.500 | 82.2 |
| 2 | 1.92 ± 0.67 | 2.50 ± 0.67 | 4.92 ± 1.38 | 9.91 | 0.013 | 0.500 | 122.6 |
| 3 | 1.92 ± 0.90 | 2.08 ± 0.90 | 2.67 ± 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.464 | 0.250 | 33.5 |
| 4 | 2.58 ± 0.79 | 3.50 ± 0.80 | 5.50 ± 1.31 | 6.40 | 0.031 | 0.500 | 80.9 |
| 5 | 2.58 ± 1.16 | 3.42 ± 1.56 | 5.00 ± 1.54 | 10.81 | 0.011 | 0.500 | 66.7 |
| 6 | 5.25 ± 1.60 | 5.58 ± 1.51 | 4.92 ± 1.62 | 4.25 | 0.067 | 0.250 | −9.1 |
| Macrofaunal abundance (ind·20 cm−2) | |||||||
| 1 | 14.33 ± 5.50 | 16.75 ± 6.86 | 46.33 ± 9.88 | 32.83 | <0.001 | 0.750 | 198.1 |
| 2 | 9.25 ± 5.22 | 9.58 ± 3.92 | 22.42 ± 7.32 | 30.02 | <0.001 | 0.750 | 138.1 |
| 3 | 4.33 ± 2.15 | 5.50 ± 4.27 | 18.58 ± 15.98 | 10.67 | 0.011 | 0.750 | 278.0 |
| 4 | 30.08 ± 17.48 | 38.42 ± 16.42 | 73.33 ± 26.53 | 8.22 | 0.020 | 0.750 | 114.1 |
| 5 | 14.42 ± 11.80 | 23.17 ± 17.86 | 62.42 ± 21.46 | 9.31 | 0.014 | 0.750 | 232.1 |
| 6 | 27.17 ± 11.39 | 27.08 ± 11.45 | 31.33 ± 16.70 | 1.06 | 0.396 | 0.250 | 15.5 |
| Meiofaunal abundance (ind·20 cm−2) | |||||||
| 1 | 346.75 ± 113.66 | 363.50 ± 94.39 | 208.67 ± 72.74 | 5.78 | 0.040 | 0.913 | −41.2 |
| 2 | 106.33 ± 23.41 | 112.08 ± 26.73 | 117.83 ± 34.88 | 0.33 | 0.729 | 0.370 | 7.9 |
| 3 | 93.92 ± 22.52 | 96.83 ± 27.73 | 45.25 ± 24.91 | 5.55 | 0.043 | 0.913 | −52.6 |
| 4 | 118.33 ± 53.73 | 137.50 ± 34.84 | 99.67 ± 26.67 | 2.29 | 0.182 | 0.550 | −22.1 |
| 5 | 356.08 ± 76.05 | 354.50 ± 61.46 | 134.08 ± 24.36 | 5.00 | 0.053 | 0.913 | −62.3 |
| 6 | 228.00 ± 147.92 | 126.33 ± 140.75 | 147.83 ± 80.96 | 2.07 | 0.207 | 0.913 | −16.6 |
| Temperature (°C) | Phytoplankton Biomass (Chl-a) | Individual FR (L·ind−1·h−1) | Mass-Standardized FR (L·gDW−1·h−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Low | 0.199 ± 0.005 | 0.650 ± 0.016 |
| 10 | Medium | 0.124 ± 0.006 | 0.405 ± 0.020 |
| 23 | Low | 0.337 ± 0.014 | 1.100 ± 0.046 |
| 23 | Medium | 0.376 ± 0.017 | 1.228 ± 0.056 |
| Source of Variation | df | F | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 1 | 1479.94 | <0.001 |
| Phytoplankton biomass (Chl-a level) | 1 | 11.91 | <0.001 |
| Temperature × Phytoplankton Biomass | 1 | 126.77 | <0.001 |
| Residual | 16 | — | — |
| Bathymetric Stratum (m)/Sites (N) | Area (m2) | Mean Density (ind·m−2) | 95% CI (ind·m−2) | Total Abundance (ind.) | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–4 (36) | 201,900 | 48.6 ± 48.5 | 32.1–65.0 | 9,803,217 | 21.9 |
| 4–12 (23) | 201,500 | 123.7 ± 80.1 | 89.0–158.3 | 24,917,315 | 55.5 |
| 12–16 (16) | 192,140 | 52.8 ± 45.9 | 28.3–77.2 | 10,139,708 | 22.6 |
| 16–19 (13) | 227,120 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0–0.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Whole lake (88) | 822,660 | n.a. | n.a. | 44,860,240 | 100.0 |
| Variable | Δ Concentration (Tr − Mean Controls) | Individual Biodeposition Rate (g·ind−1·d−1) | Lake-Scale Annual Flux (t·yr−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OM | 0.187 ± 0.029% | 0.0050 ± 0.00078 | 54.5 |
| TN | 0.302 ± 0.062 mg·g−1 | 0.00081 ± 0.00017 | 8.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Valdovinos, C.; Fierro, P.; Barrientos, D.; Valdovinos, E.; Bizama, G. Benthic–Pelagic Coupling Mediated by a Native Freshwater Mussel (Diplodon chilensis) in a Southern South American Lake. Water 2026, 18, 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040473
Valdovinos C, Fierro P, Barrientos D, Valdovinos E, Bizama G. Benthic–Pelagic Coupling Mediated by a Native Freshwater Mussel (Diplodon chilensis) in a Southern South American Lake. Water. 2026; 18(4):473. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040473
Chicago/Turabian StyleValdovinos, Claudio, Pablo Fierro, Daniela Barrientos, Elena Valdovinos, and Gustavo Bizama. 2026. "Benthic–Pelagic Coupling Mediated by a Native Freshwater Mussel (Diplodon chilensis) in a Southern South American Lake" Water 18, no. 4: 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040473
APA StyleValdovinos, C., Fierro, P., Barrientos, D., Valdovinos, E., & Bizama, G. (2026). Benthic–Pelagic Coupling Mediated by a Native Freshwater Mussel (Diplodon chilensis) in a Southern South American Lake. Water, 18(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040473

