Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Pd–Ni Nanoparticles Supported on Activated Carbon for Efficient Removal of Basic Blue 3 from Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Forensic Investigation of Four Monitored Green Infrastructure Inlets
Previous Article in Journal
Phytoplankton Community in the Western South China Sea in Winter and Summer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inorganic Nitrogen Production and Removal along the Sediment Gradient of a Stormwater Infiltration Basin
Article

Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments

1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
2
Environmental Science Program and Chemistry Department, Trinity College, 300 Summit St, Hartford, CT 06106, USA
3
The Nomad Group LLC, 45 South Park Place #4, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Peter Weiss and Ryan Winston
Water 2021, 13(9), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091210
Received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 22 April 2021 / Accepted: 24 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
Low impact development (LID) practices, such as bioretention and sand filter basins, are stormwater control measures designed to mitigate the adverse impacts of urbanization on stormwater. LID treatment performance is highly dependent on the media characteristics. The literature suggests that bioretention media often leach nutrients in the stormwater effluent. The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment performance of different sand and bioretention soil mixtures. Specifically, this investigation aimed to answer whether the use of limestone and recycled glass could improve the treatment performance of bioretention systems. Column experiments were designed to assess (1) the removal efficiencies of different sand and bioretention soil mixtures and (2) the impact of plant uptake on removal rates. Enhanced pollutant removal was observed for the custom blends with addition of limestone sand, indicating mean dissolved and total phosphorus removal of 44.5% and 32.6% respectively, while the conventional bioretention soil mixtures leached phosphorus. Moreover, improved treatment of dissolved and total copper was achieved with mean removal rates of 70.7% and 93.4%, respectively. The results suggest that the nutrient effluent concentration decreased with the addition of plants, with mean phosphorus removal of 72.4%, and mean nitrogen removal of 22% for the limestone blend. View Full-Text
Keywords: stormwater control measure (CSM); bioretention; limestone sand; pollutant removal; nutrients; stormwater quality; column experiment; pilot study stormwater control measure (CSM); bioretention; limestone sand; pollutant removal; nutrients; stormwater quality; column experiment; pilot study
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shahrokh Hamedani, A.; Bazilio, A.; Soleimanifar, H.; Shipley, H.; Giacomoni, M. Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments. Water 2021, 13, 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091210

AMA Style

Shahrokh Hamedani A, Bazilio A, Soleimanifar H, Shipley H, Giacomoni M. Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments. Water. 2021; 13(9):1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shahrokh Hamedani, Abtin, Arianne Bazilio, Hanieh Soleimanifar, Heather Shipley, and Marcio Giacomoni. 2021. "Improving the Treatment Performance of Low Impact Development Practices—Comparison of Sand and Bioretention Soil Mixtures Using Column Experiments" Water 13, no. 9: 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091210

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop