You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Robert Cifelli1,*,
  • Lynn E. Johnson1,2 and
  • Jungho Kim1,2
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Roger Wang Reviewer 3: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is well written and the addressed problem is valuable. I have two minor comments and believe addressing them could further improve the quality of the paper.

  1. It was not clear how the RDHM and CoSMoS are coupled. If they are not fully two-way coupled, how is the data transferred between the two software? How did the authors guarantee the convergence of the computation?
  2. As mentioned in the manuscript, RDHM is likely to be replaced by NWM in the future. Is there a plan to replace RDHM by NWM?

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Please see attached PDF for comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

I appreciate the attention that the authors gave to the revision. They have thoughtfully and adequately addressed the comments from the initial review. I recommend the paper for publication in its current form.