Next Article in Journal
Trend Pattern of Heavy and Intense Rainfall Events in Colombia from 1981–2018: A Trend-EOF Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Analysis of Ionospheric Anomalies before Strong Earthquakes in and around Mainland China
Previous Article in Journal
Revisiting Total Particle Number Measurements for Vehicle Exhaust Regulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
The LAI Coupling Associated with the M6 Luxian Earthquake in China on 16 September 2021
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi Field Coupled Coseismic Changes of the Jiashi Ms = 6.4 Earthquake of 19 January 2020, Based on Ground Temperature Observation

1
Xinjiang Pamir Intracontinental Subduction National Field Observation and Research Station, Urumqi 830011, China
2
Earthquake Agency of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830011, China
3
China Earthquake Networks Center, Beijing 100045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(2), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020154
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 6 January 2022 / Accepted: 17 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022

Abstract

The coseismic geothermal changes of ground temperature observed at observatories near the epicenter of the 2020 Jiashi Ms = 6.4 earthquake in China, provide a unique opportunity to study heat generation and conduction in rock. Here, evolutions of rock temperature at the Xikeer, Jiashizongchang, and Gedaliang observatories, which are located at epicentral distances of 1.4, 27.42, and 50 km respectively, were analyzed. Significant coseismic geothermal changes of 0.0432 °C were observed at the Xikeer observatory at the depth of 33.38 m, at which clear diurnal variations can be observed. Smaller changes of ~0.0001 °C were observed at the depths of 12.3 and 22.8 m at the Xikeer observatory and 22.3 m at the Jiashizongchang observatory. The stress transfer induced by the coseismic rupture induced a rise in local ground temperature, but the magnitude of the change was relatively small. The larger amplitude change at the Xikeer observatory was caused by fluid infiltration. We note that diurnal variation has been recorded at the Gedaliang observatory, but the coseismic response is no longer in existence. The temperature increases at the hypocentral area were higher than expected in the ground due to the coseismic stress transfer, but the change attenuated rapidly with distance.
Keywords: Jiashi Ms = 6.4 earthquake; ground temperature; fluid; coseismic geothermal change; temperature transfer Jiashi Ms = 6.4 earthquake; ground temperature; fluid; coseismic geothermal change; temperature transfer

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, D.; Zhao, B.; Yu, H.; Ma, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Yan, W. Multi Field Coupled Coseismic Changes of the Jiashi Ms = 6.4 Earthquake of 19 January 2020, Based on Ground Temperature Observation. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020154

AMA Style

Jia D, Zhao B, Yu H, Ma Y, Xiang Y, Yan W. Multi Field Coupled Coseismic Changes of the Jiashi Ms = 6.4 Earthquake of 19 January 2020, Based on Ground Temperature Observation. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(2):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Donghui, Binbin Zhao, Huaizhong Yu, Yuchuan Ma, Yuan Xiang, and Wei Yan. 2022. "Multi Field Coupled Coseismic Changes of the Jiashi Ms = 6.4 Earthquake of 19 January 2020, Based on Ground Temperature Observation" Atmosphere 13, no. 2: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020154

APA Style

Jia, D., Zhao, B., Yu, H., Ma, Y., Xiang, Y., & Yan, W. (2022). Multi Field Coupled Coseismic Changes of the Jiashi Ms = 6.4 Earthquake of 19 January 2020, Based on Ground Temperature Observation. Atmosphere, 13(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop