Adoption of Promising Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Characteristics in the Semiarid Climate of Turkey
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Location and Duration
2.2. Climatic Conditions
2.3. Soil Properties
2.4. Plant Materials
2.5. Experimentation
2.6. Data Collection
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Crop Phenology
3.2. Growth and Yield Traits
3.3. Yield and Harvest Index
3.4. Quality Traits
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Baydar, H. Science and Technology of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants; Nobel Book Publications: Ankara, Turkey, 2020; 420p. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- Sewell, R.D.E.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. The history and ups and downs of herbal medicine usage. J. HerbMed Pharmacol. 2014, 3, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Baradaran, A.; Nasri, H.; Nematbakhsh, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Antioxidant activity and preventive effect of aqueous leaf extract of Aloe Vera on gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in male Wistar rats. Clin. Ter. 2014, 165, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
- Nasri, H.; Tavakoli, M.; Ahmadi, A.; Baradaran, A.; Nematbakhsh, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. Ameliorative effect of melatonin against contrast media induced renal tubular cell injury. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 30, 261–265. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, U.C.S.; Baquer, N.Z. Pharmacological effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. in health and disease. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nair, R.; Pandey, S.K. Performance of potential fenugreek genotypes for seed yield and its attributing traits in vertisols of Central India. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2020, 8, 3071–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Açıkbaş, S.; Özyazıcı, M.A. The evaluation in terms of forage quality of toxic substances found in some forage crops. In Proceedings of the II International Hazar Scientific Researches Conference, Baku, Azerbaijan, 10–12 April 2021; pp. 853–864. [Google Scholar]
- Altuntaş, E.; Özgöz, E.; Taşer, Ö.F. Some physical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seeds. J. Food Eng. 2005, 71, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahmani, M.; Hedayatollah, S.; Mirhosseini, M.; Mesripour, A.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. A review on ethnobotanical and therapeutic uses of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.). J. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016, 21, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Minorsky, P.V. Trigonelline: A diverse regulator in plants. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 7–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, D.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J. Advances on application of fenugreek seeds as functional foods: Pharmacology, clinical application, products, patents and market. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2342–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basch, E.; Ulbricht, C.; Kuo, G.; Szapary, P.; Smith, M. Therapeutic applications of fenugreek. Altern. Med. Rev. 2003, 8, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Dharajiya, D.; Jasani, H.; Khatrani, T.; Kapuria, M.; Pachchıgarr, K.; Patel, P. Evaluation of antibacterial and antifungal activity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) extracts. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 212–217. [Google Scholar]
- TUİK. Crop Production Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute. 2021. Available online: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 (accessed on 11 January 2021).
- Perry, L.M. Medicinal Plants of East and Southeast Asia: Attributed Properties and Uses; The MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Ionescu, A.M.; Roman, G.V. Research on biology, productivity and yield quality of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. species (fenugreek) in the central part of the South Romanian plain. Agronomy 2013, 56, 395–397. [Google Scholar]
- Kevseroğlu, K.; Özyazıcı, G. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer doses on some agricultural characteristics of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) plant. In Proceedings of the Turkey II Field Crops Congress, Samsun, Turkey, 22–25 September 1997; pp. 367–371. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Aydın, A. Determination of Some Significant Morphologic, Fenological and Quality Criterion in Different Origins of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Populations. Master’s Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Siirt University, Samsun, Turkey, 2010; p. 56. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Mutlu, S. Determination of Some Phenological, Morphological, Yield and Quality Characteristics of Fenugreeks (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) from Different Origins. Master’s Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey, 2011; p. 88. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Akbay, F.; Erol, A. Evaluation of different fenugreek genotypes in terms of agricultural and morphological characteristics. In Proceedings of the International Agricultural Congress of Muş Plain, Muş, Turkey, 24–27 September 2019; pp. 120–131. (In Tukish). [Google Scholar]
- Başbağ, M.; Tonçer, Ö. A study on determination of yield and yield criteria of some fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) lines in Diyarbakır conditions. In Proceedings of the Turkey VI Field Crops Congress, Antalya, Turkey, 5–9 September 2005; pp. 1117–1122. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Çamlıca, M.; Yaldız, G. Characterization of morphological and yield variation of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes. Legume Res. 2019, 42, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saxena, S.N.; Kakani, R.K.; Sharma, L.K.; Agarwal, D.; John, S.; Sharma, Y. Effect of water stress on morpho-physiological parameters of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes. Legume Res. 2019, 42, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chaudhary, S.; Chaudhary, P.S.; Chikara, S.K.; Sharma, M.C.; Iriti, M. Review on fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and its important secondary metabolite diosgenin. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2018, 46, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kumar, S.; Meena, R.S.; Lal, R.; Yadav, G.S.; Mitran, T.; Meena, B.L.; Mohan Lal Dotaniya, M.L.; El-Sabagh, A. Role of Legumes in Soil Carbon Sequestration. In Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management, 1st ed.; Meena, R.S., Das, A., Yadav, G.S., Lal, R., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2018; pp. 109–138. [Google Scholar]
- Hassanzadeh, E.; Chaichi, M.R.; Mazaheri, D.; Rezazadeh, S.; Badi, H.A.N. Physical and chemical variabilities among domestic Iranian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum) seeds. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2011, 10, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anonymous. Climate Data of Siirt Province; General Directorate of Meteorology: Ankara, Turkey, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Van Wambeke, A.R. The Newhall Simulation Model for Estimating Soil Moisture and Temperature Regimes; Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Anonymous. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Registration Report, “Berkem”; T.C. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock Seed Registration and Certification Center: Ankara, Turkey, 2015. Available online: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Belgeler/Duyuru%20Belgeleri/2015%20tescil/T%C4%B1bbi%20Aromatik/tescil%20raporlar%C4%B1/2015_%C3%A7emen_tescil_raporu_fyd.pdf (accessed on 23 October 2020). (In Turkish)
- Tunçtürk, R. The effects of various fertilizer sources, sowing dates and bacteria inoculation on the yield and yield companents of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) in Van ecological conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science of Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey, 2010; p. 177. (In Turkish). [Google Scholar]
- Açıkgöz, N.; Açıkgöz, N. Some mistakes made in the statistical evaluation of agricultural research: I. Single Factor Trials. Anadolu 2001, 11, 135–147. (In Turkish) [Google Scholar]
- McCormick, K.M.; Norton, R.M.; Eagles, H.A. Phenotypic variation within a fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) germplasm collection. II. Cultivar selection based on traits associated with seed yield. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol. 2009, 56, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mamatha, N.C.; Tehlan, S.K.; Srikanth, M.; Ravikumar, T.; Batra, V.K.; Karthik Reddy, P.; Nalla, M.K. Mean performance of 150 fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes for yield and yield contributing traits. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 2017, 5, 1097–1102. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, K.C.; Sastry, E.V.D. Path analysis for seed yield and its component characters in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). J. Spices Aromat. Crop. 2008, 17, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Beyzi, E.; Köngül Şafak, E.; Gürbüz, P.; Koşar, M.; Gürbüz, B. Fatty acid composition, diosgenin and trigonelline contents of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): Effects of phosphorus fertilizer. Plant Biosyst.—Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2021, 155, 663–667. [Google Scholar]
- Ciftci, O.N.; Przybylski, R.; Rudzinska, M.; Acharya, S. Characterization of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seed lipids. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011, 88, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhamme, K.E.; Ahmed, R.M.; Muhamma, A.G. Response of seed yield and its component of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) variety to nitrogen fertilizer under rainfed condition. J. Kerbala Agric. Sci. 2018, 5, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
- Özyazıcı, G. Responses of sulfur and phosphorus doses on the yield and quality of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 7041–7055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Average Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity (%) | Total Precipitation (mm) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months | Long Term | 2018–2019 | 2019–2020 | Long Term | 2018–2019 | 2019–2020 | Long Term | 2018–2019 | 2019–2020 |
November | 10.6 | 11.0 | 11.9 | 62.7 | 76.2 | 50.2 | 74.3 | 93.6 | 51.4 |
December | 5.1 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 72.5 | 82.4 | 75.0 | 90.6 | 188.6 | 75.8 |
January | 3.2 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 72.5 | 72.2 | 72.7 | 81.0 | 94.0 | 70.6 |
February | 4.7 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 67.5 | 66.9 | 73.0 | 98.4 | 98.6 | 158.6 |
March | 9.2 | 8.3 | 11.1 | 61.3 | 67.4 | 63.1 | 112.5 | 185.2 | 222.4 |
April | 14.2 | 11.9 | 14.1 | 58.4 | 66.5 | 60.2 | 103.5 | 167.0 | 158.8 |
May | 19.8 | 21.9 | 20.8 | 50.1 | 41.8 | 47.1 | 63.1 | 63.0 | 40.4 |
June | 25.9 | 29.1 | 27.2 | 33.9 | 34.7 | 26.6 | 9.1 | 9.4 | 0.2 |
Total/Average | 11.6 | 12.3 | 12.5 | 59.9 | 63.5 | 58.5 | 632.5 | 899.4 | 778.2 |
Soil Properties | Values (2018–2019) * | Values (2019–2020) * |
---|---|---|
Clay (%) | 58.00 | 38.90 |
Sand (%) | 28.00 | 43.10 |
Silt (%) | 14.00 | 18.00 |
pH | 7.95 | 7.70 |
Organic matter (%) | 1.58 | 1.64 |
Lime (CaCO3) (%) | 10.5 | 2.79 |
Electrical conductivity (dS m−1) | 0.575 | 0.180 |
Available phosphorus (P) (kg P2O5 ha−1) | 35 | 112 |
Available potassium (K) (kg K2O ha−1) | 1180 | 1882 |
Genotypes | Plant Height (cm) | First Pod Height (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | |
Adana | 65.8 ef | 73.2 a–d | 69.5 d | 30.13 fg | 34.40 def | 32.26 ef |
Afghanistan | 61.1 f | 68.2 f | 64.6 e | 23.63 h | 26.90 gh | 25.26 g |
Berkem | 78.3 ab | 79.2 a | 78.7 a | 39.88 ab | 43.65 a | 41.76 a |
Gaziantep | 74.6 abc | 78.2 ab | 76.4 ab | 39.55 abc | 40.23 ab | 39.89 ab |
Gürarslan | 70.5 cde | 72.9 bcd | 71.7 cd | 33.63 ef | 35.28 cde | 34.45 cd |
Iraq | 73.9 a–d | 73.3 a–d | 73.6 bc | 39.55 abc | 36.40 b–e | 37.97 bc |
Kahramanmaraş | 73.7 a–d | 73.9 a–d | 73.8 bc | 36.15 b–e | 37.03 b–e | 36.59 bc |
Kayseri | 78.3 ab | 78.5 ab | 78.4 a | 27.58 gh | 32.90 ef | 30.24 f |
Mardin | 71.4 cde | 73.8 a–d | 72.6 bcd | 37.30 b–e | 38.30 bcd | 37.80 bc |
Şanlıurfa | 73.2 a–d | 78.9 ab | 75.5 ab | 38.28 bcd | 40.32 ab | 39.20 abc |
Average | 72.06 b | 74.87 a | 34.56 b | 36.45 a | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.0034 ** | 0.0449 * | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0001 ** | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.0057 ** | 0.0007 ** |
Genotypes | Pod Width (mm) | Pod Length (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | |
Adana | 3.06 | 3.03 | 3.04 ab | 11.72 | 12.98 | 12.35 ab |
Afghanistan | 2.91 | 2.93 | 2.92 b | 9.62 | 10.53 | 10.07 e |
Berkem | 3.00 | 3.30 | 3.15 ab | 11.69 | 12.35 | 12.02 abc |
Gaziantep | 3.12 | 3.20 | 3.16 ab | 11.58 | 12.13 | 11.85 a–d |
Gürarslan | 2.88 | 2.95 | 2.91 b | 11.49 | 12.70 | 12.09 abc |
Iraq | 3.06 | 3.05 | 3.06 ab | 10.54 | 11.30 | 10.92 de |
Kahramanmaraş | 3.21 | 3.28 | 3.24 ab | 11.34 | 12.28 | 11.81 a–d |
Kayseri | 3.06 | 3.05 | 3.05 ab | 11.27 | 11.38 | 11.32 cd |
Mardin | 3.18 | 3.40 | 3.29 a | 11.17 | 12.05 | 11.61 bcd |
Şanlıurfa | 3.03 | 3.04 | 3.04 ab | 12.23 | 13.19 | 12.60 a |
Average | 3.05 | 3.13 | 11.26 b | 12.05 a | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.1248 ns | 0.0005 ** | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0154 * | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.8852 ns | 0.8012 ns |
Genotypes | Pod Number Per Plant (Piece/Plant) | Seed Number Per Pod (Piece/Pod) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | |
Adana | 19.50 ab | 16.00 cd | 17.75 a | 13.53 | 15.80 | 14.66 ab |
Afghanistan | 11.85 ı | 12.80 f–ı | 12.33 c | 15.05 | 16.05 | 15.55 a |
Berkem | 14.95 def | 14.65 d–g | 14.80 b | 13.25 | 15.53 | 14.39 ab |
Gaziantep | 18.40 b | 18.18 bc | 18.29 a | 12.95 | 14.25 | 13.60 bc |
Gürarslan | 12.50 g–ı | 12.20 hı | 12.35 c | 12.13 | 12.98 | 12.55 c |
Iraq | 21.30 a | 16.15 cd | 18.73 a | 15.40 | 15.68 | 15.54 a |
Kahramanmaraş | 14.25 d–h | 13.25 e–ı | 13.75 b | 12.88 | 13.10 | 12.99 bc |
Kayseri | 19.75 ab | 15.83 d | 17.79 a | 12.28 | 14.08 | 13.18 bc |
Mardin | 15.30 de | 13.50 e–ı | 14.40 b | 13.70 | 13.08 | 13.39 bc |
Şanlıurfa | 11.60 ı | 12.72 f–ı | 12.00 c | 13.35 | 13.02 | 13.26 bc |
Average | 15.94 a | 14.53 b | 13.45 b | 14.36 a | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.0011 ** | 0.0036 ** | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0001 ** | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.0001 ** | 0.0973 ns |
Genotypes | Biological Yield (t/ha−1) | Seed Yield (t/ha−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean 1 | |
Adana | 3.82 | 9.11 | 6.47 abc | 1.24 a–d | 1.28 a–d | 1.26 a |
Afghanistan | 3.18 | 7.07 | 5.12 c | 0.98 def | 1.11 b–e | 1.04 bc |
Berkem | 5.36 | 9.88 | 7.62 a | 1.39 ab | 1.37 abc | 1.38 a |
Gaziantep | 4.24 | 8.76 | 6.50 abc | 1.01 def | 1.09 b–e | 1.05 bc |
Gürarslan | 4.42 | 7.50 | 5.96 abc | 0.91 ef | 1.10 b–e | 1.01 c |
Iraq | 3.10 | 7.52 | 5.31 bc | 0.76 f | 1.06 c–f | 0.91 c |
Kahramanmaraş | 5.40 | 9.07 | 7.23 ab | 1.24 a–d | 1.20 a–e | 1.22 ab |
Kayseri | 4.58 | 9.08 | 6.83 abc | 1.37 abc | 1.18 a–e | 1.27 a |
Mardin | 4.51 | 8.09 | 6.30 abc | 1.44 a | 1.24 a–d | 1.34 a |
Şanlıurfa | 4.82 | 9.28 | 7.05 abc | 1.28 a–d | 1.20 a–e | 1.24 ab |
Average | 4.34 b | 8.53 a | 1.16 | 1.18 | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.0001 ** | 0.589 ns | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0018 ** | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.8335 ns | 0.0014 ** |
Genotypes | Harvest Index (%) | Thousand-Seed Weight (g) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean1 | |
Adana | 32.54 a | 14.13 ef | 23.34 ab | 15.62 | 15.54 | 15.58 c |
Afghanistan | 32.80 a | 15.91 c–f | 24.35 a | 14.99 | 15.09 | 15.04 c |
Berkem | 25.96 abc | 14.41 ef | 20.18 bc | 16.53 | 16.95 | 16.74 abc |
Gaziantep | 24.25 a–e | 12.64 f | 18.45 c | 16.97 | 17.09 | 17.03 ab |
Gürarslan | 20.93 b–f | 14.89 def | 17.91 c | 17.30 | 17.61 | 17.45 a |
Iraq | 24.87 a–d | 14.25 ef | 19.56 bc | 13.60 | 14.13 | 13.87 d |
Kahramanmaraş | 22.89 a–f | 13.59 f | 18.24 c | 16.88 | 17.08 | 16.98 ab |
Kayseri | 29.87 ab | 13.43 f | 21.65 abc | 16.81 | 17.09 | 16.95 ab |
Mardin | 32.89 a | 15.51 def | 24.20 a | 16.07 | 16.12 | 16.09 bc |
Şanlıurfa | 26.57 ab | 13.06 f | 19.82 bc | 17.43 | 16.23 | 16.83 ab |
Average | 27.36 a | 14.18 b | 16.22 | 16.29 | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.0001 ** | 0.5653 ns | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0038 ** | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.0414 ** | 0.4210 ns |
Genotypes | Fatty Oil Ratio (%) | Fatty Oil Yield (kg ha−1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean1 | 1st Year | 2nd Year | Mean1 | |
Adana | 5.87 | 5.99 | 5.93 c | 72.7 | 76.9 | 74.8 c |
Afghanistan | 8.92 | 9.40 | 9.16 a | 86.9 | 104.0 | 95.4 b |
Berkem | 7.98 | 8.24 | 8.11 b | 110.6 | 112.7 | 111.6 a |
Gaziantep | 5.31 | 5.37 | 5.34 cd | 53.6 | 58.6 | 56.0 de |
Gürarslan | 6.05 | 5.98 | 6.02 c | 55.2 | 66.1 | 60.7 cde |
Iraq | 5.30 | 5.48 | 5.39 cd | 40.5 | 58.2 | 49.3 e |
Kahramanmaraş | 5.93 | 6.02 | 5.97 c | 73.3 | 72.1 | 72.7 c |
Kayseri | 5.37 | 5.32 | 5.34 cd | 73.4 | 62.8 | 68.1 cd |
Mardin | 5.47 | 5.59 | 5.53 cd | 78.8 | 69.9 | 74.3 c |
Şanlıurfa | 5.04 | 5.33 | 5.18 d | 64.4 | 63.9 | 64.1 cde |
Average | 6.12 | 6.27 | 70.9 | 74.5 | ||
p value | Year (Y) | 0.1747 ns | 0.1850 ns | |||
Genotype (G) | 0.0001 ** | 0.0001 ** | ||||
Y × G | 0.9802 ns | 0.0656 ns |
Genotypes | Trigonelline Ratio (%) |
---|---|
Adana | 0.91 |
Afghanistan | 0.86 |
Berkem | 0.71 |
Gaziantep | 1.32 |
Gürarslan | 0.96 |
Iraq | 0.78 |
Kahramanmaraş | 0.94 |
Kayseri | 1.04 |
Mardin | 1.12 |
Şanlıurfa | 1.09 |
Ortalama | 0.97 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Güzel, Y.; Özyazıcı, G. Adoption of Promising Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Characteristics in the Semiarid Climate of Turkey. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091199
Güzel Y, Özyazıcı G. Adoption of Promising Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Characteristics in the Semiarid Climate of Turkey. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(9):1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091199
Chicago/Turabian StyleGüzel, Yunus, and Gülen Özyazıcı. 2021. "Adoption of Promising Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Characteristics in the Semiarid Climate of Turkey" Atmosphere 12, no. 9: 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091199
APA StyleGüzel, Y., & Özyazıcı, G. (2021). Adoption of Promising Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) Genotypes for Yield and Quality Characteristics in the Semiarid Climate of Turkey. Atmosphere, 12(9), 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12091199