Next Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Putative Genes Involved in Steroid Biosynthesis in Euphorbia tirucalli
Next Article in Special Issue
The Moss Physcomitrella patens Is Hyperresistant to DNA Double-Strand Breaks Induced by γ-Irradiation
Previous Article in Journal
An Introduction to Integrative Genomics and Systems Medicine in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
RAD4 and RAD23/HMR Contribute to Arabidopsis UV Tolerance
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Scaffolding for Repair: Understanding Molecular Functions of the SMC5/6 Complex

Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences (IEB), Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 31, 77900 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research (MPIPZ), Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(1), 36;
Submission received: 15 November 2017 / Revised: 3 January 2018 / Accepted: 4 January 2018 / Published: 12 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Damage Responses in Plants)


Chromosome organization, dynamics and stability are required for successful passage through cellular generations and transmission of genetic information to offspring. The key components involved are Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes. Cohesin complex ensures proper chromatid alignment, condensin complex chromosome condensation and the SMC5/6 complex is specialized in the maintenance of genome stability. Here we summarize recent knowledge on the composition and molecular functions of SMC5/6 complex. SMC5/6 complex was originally identified based on the sensitivity of its mutants to genotoxic stress but there is increasing number of studies demonstrating its roles in the control of DNA replication, sister chromatid resolution and genomic location-dependent promotion or suppression of homologous recombination. Some of these functions appear to be due to a very dynamic interaction with cohesin or other repair complexes. Studies in Arabidopsis indicate that, besides its canonical function in repair of damaged DNA, the SMC5/6 complex plays important roles in regulating plant development, abiotic stress responses, suppression of autoimmune responses and sexual reproduction.

1. Introduction

The eukaryotic nuclear genome is organized into linear chromosomes. Chromosomal DNA is wrapped around histone octamers forming nucleosomes. Nucleosomes are the primary chromatin units, which are folded into chromatin fibers and the fibers into domains of different density and accessibility [1,2]. Chromosome and chromatin stability is challenged by endogenous factors including free radicals, replication errors and topological stress [3]. Exogenous damage is exerted by adverse environmental conditions such as UV radiation, oxidative stress and chemical pollutants [4]. These (and other) factors challenge genome stability by a wide range of toxic effects including base oxidation, alkylation, DNA single and double strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) and formation of non-native bonds within and/or between DNA strands [5]. Unrepaired or misrepaired lesions result in mutations, which compromise gene functionality, cause loss/gain of genetic information and induce chromosome instability. This problem may be particularly pronounced in obligatory phototrophic sessile organisms such as plants, which are exposed to challenging environmental conditions without possibility for escape [6,7].
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes are the key regulators of chromosome dynamics, structure and function in eukaryotes (reviewed in [8,9,10,11,12]). They operate from the scale of whole chromosomes in chromosome segregation to few base pairs in DNA damage repair. The core subunits of SMC complexes are SMC proteins, which are large polypeptides (1000–1300 amino acids) containing Walker A and Walker B motifs at their N- and C-terminal globular domains. The primary step towards functional SMC protein is folding at the hinge domain and coiling of the arms. This brings the C- and N-terminal globular domains together and constitutes heads with ATP-dependent DNA binding activity [13]. The most characterized SMC complex is cohesin (containing SMC1 and SMC3). It controls dynamics of sister chromatid cohesion and thus affects chromosome segregation, meiotic recombination and DNA damage repair (reviewed in [9,10,11]). Condensin complex (containing SMC2 and SMC4) plays a pivotal role in chromosome folding and condensation during interphase and nuclear division. Finally, the third complex consisting of SMC5 and SMC6 heterodimer backbone, called SMC5/6, is famous for its role in maintaining genome stability [8]). Beside the SMC5 and SMC6, this complex contains six additional NON-SMC ELEMENT (NSE) subunits (Figure 1A,B and Table 1) and the whole complex is organized into three sub-complexes: NSE2-SMC5-SMC6, NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 and NSE5-NSE6 acting as specialized functional modules [14,15,16]. In spite of increasing number of studies, the functions of SMC5/6 complex still remain relatively poorly understood. To foster this research, we provide an overview on the current understanding of SMC5/6 complex functions.

2. Architecture of SMC5/6 Complex

2.1. NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 Subcomplex

NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 trimer is a highly conserved part of the SMC5/6 complex responsible for binding DNA and bridging SMC heads. NSE1 contains a RING-like domain necessary for the NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 trimer formation and recruitment of NSE4 and SMC5 to the sites of DNA damage [17,18,19,20]. Mutations in the RING-like domain lead to DNA damage hypersensitivity and full deletion of NSE1 is lethal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Arabidopsis [17,18,21]. In multiple organisms, it was shown that NSE1 interacts with the N-terminus of NSE3 subunit and strengthens its binding to dsDNA [15,16,20,21,22,23].
NSE3 occurs as single copy gene in fungi and plants but has homology to MELANOMA ANTIGEN GENE (MAGE) family with over 60 members in humans. MAGEs interact in vitro with E3 RING-type ubiquitin ligases. However, only MAGE-G1 and MAGE-F1 have been found to associate with NSE1 and only MAGE-G1 co-immunoprecipitated with the SMC5/6 holocomplex in human cells [19,24,25]. MAGEs are aberrantly expressed in a wide variety of cancer types and play a critical role in tumorigenesis [26,27]. The presence of MAGE-G1 and UBIQUITIN CONJUGATING ENZYME H 13 (UBCH13) and METHYL METHANE SULFONATE SENSITIVE 2 (MMS2) significantly enhances NSE1 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity [24].
The C-terminal domain of NSE3 interacts with NSE4 [22]. NSE4 is a structural protein containing a winged helix motif, which forms a RING-like structure through interaction with SMC proteins [16,28]. NSE4 is an essential protein and its functions include: interaction between NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 sub-complex and SMC5 as shown in S. pombe [15] and bridging SMC5 and SMC6 heads as found in S. cerevisiae [16].

2.2. NSE2-SMC5-SMC6 Sub-Complex

NSE2-SMC5-SMC6 represents the core sub-complex, which serves as a central scaffold. Via NSE2/MMS1 enzymatic activity it most likely regulates dynamics of the whole complex at its target sites. NSE2/MMS21 was initially identified via genetic screen as hypersensitive to methyl methane sulfonate, X-rays and UV radiation in budding yeast [29] and was associated with SMC5/6 complex only about two decades later [30]. NSE2/MMS21 is covalently bound to the SMC5 protein (Figure 1A) and this association appears to be conserved in fungi, animals and plants [14,15,31,32]. NSE2/MMS21 contains a putative Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT-Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (SIZ/PIAS) RING domain characteristic of Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) ligase [30]. In general, SUMO modification is involved in various cellular processes, such as nuclear-cytosolic transport, transcriptional regulation, apoptosis, protein stability, response to stress and progression through the cell cycle [33,34]. However, which of these (and potentially other) processes can be assigned to NSE2/MMS21 is largely unknown. In vitro studies revealed that NSE2/MMS21 adds SUMO modifications to (SUMOylates) numerous proteins, some in a species-specific manner. So far identified NSE2/MMS21 targets include SMC6, NSE3 and NSE4 in fission yeast; SMC5 and KU70 in budding yeast; SMC6, cohesin subunits SA2 and SCC1, Translin associated factor-X (TRAX) and several members of the SHELTERIN/TELOSOME complex in humans [20,30,32,35,36,37,38]. Surprisingly, in fungi, animals and plants NSE2 SUMOylates itself at the C-terminal region and thus most likely auto-regulates its own function. Catalytically dead human NSE2/MMS21 is not able to alleviate hypersensitivity to DNA damage, suggesting that NSE2/MMS21 SUMO ligase activity is required for proper cellular response to DNA damage [32]. Similarly to yeast and human, A. thaliana NSE2/MMS21/HPY2 (HIGH PLOIDY 2) was auto-SUMOylated in in vitro experiments and this activity could be abolished by H180A substitution in the SIZ/PIAS-RING domain [39,40]. This suggests that SIZ/PIAS-RING is crucial for the catalytic function of the protein. Though important, NSE2/MMS21 is not essential in Arabidopsis. The mutants are viable but have strong developmental phenotypes including small growth, deformed leaves, stem fasciations and are partially sterile and produce reduced number of seeds.

2.3. NSE5-NSE6 Sub-Complex

The NSE5-NSE6 sub-complex is most likely responsible for loading, localization or multimerization of SMC5/6 complex (Figure 1B,C) and represents its evolutionarily non-conserved part. This sub-complex was identified via proteomic experiments using fungi, plants and Xenopus laevis egg extracts as a pair of unknown SMC5/6 associated proteins (Table 1); these include YML023c (alias NSE5) and KRE29 in budding yeast [30] and NSE5 and NSE6 in fission yeast [41], ARABIDOPSIS SNI ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 1 (ASAP1) and SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1, INDUCIBLE 1 (SNI1) in Arabidopsis [42] and SMC5-SMC6 complex localization factors 1 and 2 (SLF1 and SLF2) in vertebrates [43]. KRE29, NSE6, SNI1 and SLF2 contain armadillo (ARM) repeats [44], which are supposed to form a superhelix of α-helices resulting in a spiral structure. 3D modeling suggested that all these factors have a highly similar protein structure, where several essential residues of the Armadillo (ARM)-repeats create a binding surface not apparent from the linear sequence [41,42]. Their interaction partners YML023c, SLF1 and ASAP1 are considered as the putative functional orthologues of NSE5. Beside little conserved protein sequence, NSE5 and NSE6 differ also with respect to their position in the complex. In budding yeast NSE6 and NSE5 bind to the hinges of SMC5 and SMC6 [15], while in fission yeast they bind to SMC5 and SMC6 heads, without directly interacting with the NSE1-NSE3-NSE4 trimer (Figure 1B) [16,41]. Location of SNI1 and ASAP1 in Arabidopsis and SLF1 and SLF2 in vertebrates remains unknown (Figure 1B). The function of NSE5-NSE6 is unclear but an earlier study [16] proposed that this sub-complex could mediate SMC5/6 complex multimerization (Figure 1C). In vertebrates, SLF1-SLF2 subcomplex mediates interaction of SMC5/6 with RAD18 E3 ubiquitin protein-ligase during the process of DNA damage repair at stalled replication forks [43]. Both NSE5 and NSE6 were shown to be essential in budding yeast but not in fission yeast. In A. thaliana, loss of SNI1 function leads to smaller and poorly looking plants with strongly reduced fertility. Homozygous ASAP1 mutant plants are not able to develop beyond the cotyledon stage and die [42].

3. SMC5/6 Complex Molecular Functions

3.1. DNA Damage Repair

Repair of damaged DNA represents the canonical function of SMC5/6 complex and multiple complex subunits were identified in genetic screens based on mutant hyper-sensitivity to genotoxic stress [35,43,45,46,47,48]. Because the role of the SMC5/6 complex in fungal and animal DNA damage repair was summarized in several recent reviews (See [11,49,50,51]), we will focus mainly on the plant data in this section.
Arabidopsis SMC6B and NSE2/MMS21/HPY2 (high polidy 2) mutants show moderate hypersensitivity to UV, X-rays and mitomycin C (MMC) and strong hypersensitivity to MMS and zebularine [39,47,52,53,54]. While genotoxic effects of most of these treatments are generally well understood [55], effects of zebularine remain less clear. Our group found that besides its (relatively weak) DNA demethylating effects [53,56,57], it acts as a potent inducer of enzymatic DNA-protein crosslinks [58]. Collectively, the DNA damage assays indicate that the SMC5/6 complex participates in (post-)replicative repair of mainly complex or bulky lesions (Figure 1D) and has only a negligible role in non-homologous end joining repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in Arabidopsis.
In animals and fungi, both cohesin and SMC5/6 complexes are recruited to DSB sites [38,59,60,61,62]. Initial observations in human cells revealed that the SMC5/6 complex recruits cohesin, facilitating repair by homologous recombination (HR) and this recruitment was dependent on NSE2/MMS21 mediated SUMOylation [38]. Recent study using Xenopus laevis eggs and human cells revealed that the recruitment of SMC5/6 to the sites of DNA damage in vertebrates is dependent on RAD18 and newly identified NSE5- and NSE6-like subunits SLF1 and SLF2 [43]. In contrast, the yeast SMC5/6 complex requires loading to chromosomes via the SCC1 subunit of cohesin complex [59,60,63]. Hence, loading of the SMC5/6 complex may be process- and/or species-specific. Data using flow-sorted Arabidopsis G2 nuclei revealed an SMC5/6-dependent increase in sister chromatid alignment upon induction of DNA damage, which depends on correct S phase-mediated cohesion [52].
Using transgenic reporter systems it was shown that Arabidopsis SMC6A, SMC6B and NSE2/MMS21 mutants have reduced frequency of HR under control conditions [47,52,54]. Upon genotoxic treatments, wild-type and also SMC6A and SMC6B mutants (NSE2/MMS21 was not tested) showed similar fold-increase but the total number of HR events still remained much lower in the mutants. In contrast, expression of SMC6B under the control of a strong constitutive viral promoter doubled HR frequency [47,64]. This indicates that the plant SMC5/6 complex functions as positive regulator of HR in a regulatory network, where several pathways compete for processing lesions by different repair mechanisms. This observation is consistent with the fungal and animal models [18,38,62,65].
Two evolutionary conserved kinases ATAXIA TELANGIECTASIA MUTATED (ATM) and ATM AND RAD3-RELATED (ATR) are involved in signaling presence of DNA strand breaks and single stranded DNA (typically at stalled replication forks), respectively, within the HR pathway [66,67,68]. Processing of spontaneous damages (presumably induced by DNA replication) is controlled by ATR, while both kinases are involved in signalling the presence of zebularine-induced DNA damage [42,53]. Whether the Arabidopsis SMC5/6 complex is directly phosphorylated by ATM and/or ATR remains unknown. A recent study analyzing phosphoproteomic targets of ATM and ATR did not reveal any SMC5/6 members [69]. However, this could be due to the treatment with gamma-radiation producing mainly DSBs, i.e., substrate which is not a typical target of SMC5/6 complex-mediated repair in Arabidopsis. Alternatively, SMC5/6 complex members could be activated at transcriptional level. We consider this scenario less likely because none of the complex subunits was detected up- or down-regulated in genome-wide studies using wild-type and ATM and ATR mutant plants exposed to variety of DNA damaging treatments [53,68,70].
Homology based repair is particularly challenging in tandemly repeated genome regions. High similarity of individual repeat units increases the risk of HR between ectopic copies, which can lead to loss of genetic information [71,72]. Data from yeasts and animals suggest that the SMC5/6 complex is recruited to replication fork barriers (RFBs) in rDNA and telomeres during G2/M and controls HR (Figure 1E,F) [8,62,73,74,75]. Presence of the SMC5/6 complex at rDNA loci (and telomeres) reduces activity of the recombination proteins like RAD51 [76,77], while its loss is accompanied by formation of RAD52 foci, indicative of error-prone repair, increased frequency of holiday junctions, HR and chromosomal rearrangements [73,78]. An interesting mechanism reducing the risk of ectopic recombination at repetitive DNA was described in insects and fungi [76,77,78]. Here, SMC5/6 complex interaction with heterochomatin protein 1 (HP1) blocks HR in heterochromatin until its expansion and relocation of damage sites into euchromatic nuclear space poor in repetitive DNA. SMC5/6 dependent heterochromatin remodeling upon DNA damage has not been observed in plants so far but one study showed that the kinetics of DSB repair is slower in the SMC6B mutant [79]. This may indicate that the SMC5/6 complex affects repair kinetics in plants but whether this is accompanied with heterochromatin relaxation needs to be analyzed.

3.2. Removal of Replication-Derived Toxic Structures

Assisting DNA replication machinery, removal of toxic replication structures and relief from DNA topological stress represent potentially highly conserved but only recently discovered SMC5/6 functions. Hypersensitivity of SMC5/6 mutants to the replication blocking agents, such as hydroxyurea (HU) and MMS, led to assumption that the complex may be involved in detoxifying toxic structures arising during DNA replication [80]. A recent study in budding yeast revealed that SMC5/6 complex functions are essential during (late) G2 phase but not in the other cell cycle stages including S-phase, under non-damaging conditions [75]. Absence of SMC5/6 during S-phase allows normal replication initiation and fork speed, suggesting that the SMC5/6 function is post-replicative [75]. To date, two major post-replicative functions of SMC5/6 complex have been described: (i) removal of DNA supercoils and sister chromatid intertwining (SCIs) and (ii) resolving toxic DNA replication intermediates (Figure 1D,E).
Progressive separation of the parental DNA strands by replication machinery leads to the accumulation of positively supercoiled DNA ahead of the replication fork and formation of SCIs, i.e., coiled dsDNA strands, behind the fork (Figure 1E). Both structures are problematic as they cause topological stress and hinder sister chromatid separation during mitosis, respectively and therefore need to be removed in order to allow normal cellular functions [81]. Experiments in budding yeast showed that DNA supercoils are resolved by the coordinated actions of type I TOPOISOMERASE 1 (TOP1) and type II TOPOISOMERASE 2 (TOP2), while SCIs are removed by the activity of TOP2 as shown in budding yeast [82]. Recently also the SMC5/6 complex was found to play a role in removal of DNA supercoils and formation of SCIs in S. cerevisiae [60,83]. It is assumed that SMC5/6 facilitates fork rotation by sequestering nascent SCIs that form behind the replication machinery, thus decreasing the level of replication-induced supercoiling [60,83]. The SMC5/6 complex is loaded to the sites of DNA topological stress by the cohesin complex during S-phase as indicated by the absence of chromosome bound SMC5/6 in cohesin mutant scc1 but loss of SMC5/6 function does not affect cohesin localization [60]. Based on the experiments with circular DNA molecules, it was suggested that the SMC5/6 complex and TOP2 function as ATP-dependent DNA linkers, which facilitate intermolecular interaction of DNA molecules through their topological entrapment [13]. In addition, TOP2 causes SMC5/6 to dissociate from chromosome arms under non-stress conditions [60,83], possibly by efficient removal of SCIs, upon which the presence of SMC5/6 is no longer required. Depletion of human SMC5 and SMC6 results in abnormal distribution of TOPOIIα, a homolog of the yeast TOP2, which probably leads to accumulation and/or abnormal distribution of SCIs and aberrant chromosome segregation [84]. In budding yeast, SMC5/6 may oppose the SCI stabilizing activity of the cohesin complex in the absence of TOP2 activity and thus allow easier passive sister chromatid resolution at the end of chromosomes [60]. This suggests that the SMC5/6 complex controls the TOP2-independent SCI resolution pathway. This model is based on budding yeast where sister chromatids remain paired with each other after DNA replication [85]. In Arabidopsis, where centromeres and telomeres show the highest degree of cohesion, in spite of a generally low degree of sister chromatid association during interphase [86], the SMC5/6 complex activity may be stimulated on demand after e.g., occurrence of DNA damage [52].
Another important SMC5/6 function linked to the post-replicative phase is a rescue of the collapsed replication forks and repair of the replication-derived toxic HR intermediates [75,80,87]. These are typically represented by X-shaped holiday junction structures formed during template switch in HR events (Figure 1D). They arise during bypass synthesis, when DNA polymerase encounters a block during DNA synthesis, switches the template to the newly replicated strand and returns to the original template after the damage. It is known that HR intermediates are repaired synergistically by the SMC5/6 complex and the STR complex, which consists of RECQ type helicase SLOW GROWTH SUPPRESSOR 1 (SGS1), type I TOPOISOMERASE 3 (TOP3) and RECQ-MEDIATED GENOME INSTABILITY PROTEIN 1 (RMI1) containing domain of unknown function in budding yeast [80,88,89,90]. The SMC5/6 complex associates to SGS1 and SUMOylates the STR complex, which decreases the presence of recombination structures [80,89]. The resolution of branched structures seems to be dependent on the SUMOylation ability of NSE2/MMS21, as the SGS1 mutants, impaired in recognition of SUMOylated SMC5/6 complex, exhibited unprocessed holiday junctions at damaged replication forks, increased exchange frequencies between double helices during double-strand break repair and severe impairment in DNA end resection [87,88]. Furthermore, there is an alternative (non-canonical) HR intermediate resolution pathway represented by MUTATOR PHENOTYPE 1 (MPH1), MMS2 and the SHU complex in budding yeast. It was proposed that the SMC5/6 complex acts antagonistically to MPH1, in a pathway distinct from that of SGS1, preventing accumulation of toxic intermediate structures [91,92].

4. Plant-Specific SMC5/6 Complex Functions

SMC5/6 complex controls number of processes, which are unique to higher plants and we will provide their overview in this section. Many of these phenotypes appear to be critical for successful plant development and affect also economically important traits such as yield or stress resistance. However, for many plant SMC5/6 mutant phenotypes it cannot be currently unambiguously decided whether they are caused by the lack of complex’ DNA damage repair functions or other activities.
Plant SMC5/6 complex includes six evolutionarily conserved and two plant-specific (ASAP1 and SNI1) SMC5/6 subunits (Table 2). In spite of frequent polyploidization events during the evolution of seed plants, most subunits are represented by a single copy gene in the extant species. The only exception, is NSE4, which is represented by two or more copies in almost all analyzed seed plants (Table 2; note that the two SMC6 copies found in A. thaliana represent Brassicaceae family specific duplication event and are not found in other groups of vascular plants). Functional consequences of the NSE4 duplications remain unknown but transcriptional data from tomato and Arabidopsis suggest that some NSE4 copies are expressed only in specific developmental stages [52] (Table 2). By analysis of publicly available ATH1 expression microarray data [93] we show that Arabidopsis SMC5/6 complex subunits are expressed mainly in dividing tissues (Figure 2A; note that NSE1 and NSE4A are missing on ATH1 chip). There were relatively strong differences between subunits and the strongest signals were found for SMC5, SMC6B, NSE2/MMS21 and ASAP1. The strong signal for ASAP1 contrasted with the low signal for its interaction partner SNI1 in most tissues, possibly indicating different mRNA stability or mobility of both SMC5/6 members.

4.1. Developmental Regulator

Multiple studies showed that the SMC5/6 complex regulates specific developmental processes including e.g., meristem and stem cell niche size, flowering time, meiosis, gametophyte and seed development in Arabidopsis [21,39,40,95,96,97]. The unifying theme of the affected tissues and biological processes is that they contain a high proportion of replicating nuclei and rapidly dividing cells, which could be associated with higher amounts of naturally occurring DNA damage and/or topological stress (Figure 1D,E). Moreover, some of these tissues represent germline cells, which appear to be under a strict control concerning genome and epigenome stability in plants [6,56,98,99,100].
Most developmental phenotypes controlled by SMC5/6 complex are described for NSE2/MMS21, which is (together with SNI1) the only non-duplicated subunit producing viable homozygous mutants. Arabidopsis NSE2/MMS21 mutants (Figure 2B) were identified based on the short roots with increased nuclear endoploidy (therefore named as HIGH POIDY 2 and abbreviated as HPY2), abnormally developed shoots with small leaves, irregular phylotaxy, occasional fasciations and partial sterility [39,40]. Cells within NSE2/MMS21 mutant root apical meristems are disorganized and display an increased frequency of cell death. Molecular and genetic studies in Arabidopsis revealed that NSE2/MMS21 promote G1/S and G2/M transitions by destabilizing E2Fa/DPa transcription factor complex and promoting CyclinB1;1, respectively [39,101]. In parallel, NSE2/MMS21 affects other pathways during root development. The NSE2/MMS21 mutants show reduced response to exogenous cytokinin and down-regulation of transcription factors from cytokinin-induced arabidipsis response regulators (ARR) family [40]. There is also misregulation of stem cell niche-defining transcription factors [31] and recent study revealed that NSE2/MMS21 activity is required for high levels of BRAHMA chromatin remodelling factor and thus normal root development [102]. The phenotypes of NSE2/MMS21 mutants are strengthened by application of exogenous DNA damaging factors, suggesting that inability to process particular types of toxic DNA structures represents another challenge [31].
Recently, NSE2/MMS21 was identified as floral repressor [96]. The MMS21 mutant flowered earlier under both long and short day conditions, it had reduced amount of transcript and protein of the key floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) and an increased transcript amount of the floral inducers SUPPRESSOR OF CONSTANS (SOC1) and flowering locus t (FT). FLC is the direct upstream regulator of FT, which then regulates SOC1 [103]. This indicates that the SMC5/6 complex promotes FLC transcription. This could occur via interaction or competition with Polycomb Repressive Complexes and/or LIKE-HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 (LHP1), which are important modulators of FLC activity [104,105,106]. Besides altering FLC transcription, NSE2/MMS21 also SUMOylates FLC protein. We speculate that such activity could take place when FLC binds to its target gene FT and possibly alter FLC activity or stability (Figure 1G). Collectively, this suggests that NSE2/MMS21 prevents precocious flowering in Arabidopsis.
Once the decision to flower is reached, plants undergo a series of complex developmental events including production of gametes and seeds. The SMC5/6 complex plays critical role during multiple stages of generative development. NSE2/MMS21 mutants showed lagging chromosomes and occasional anaphase bridges at meiotic metaphase I, indicating genome instability in male meiosis [97]. In addition, several transcripts for meiotic genes related to chromosome maintenance and recombination were altered in NSE2/MMS21 mutants [97]. At the end of meiosis, NSE2/MMS21 mutant plants developed not only tetrads but also dyads with large nuclei, which produced a smaller number of pollen, with poor germination and abnormal tube growth. Although, NSE2/MMS21 activity is required for successful male gametogenesis, the role of whole SMC5/6 complex in this process is far from being understood.
Fully developed micro- and mega-gametophytes, represented by pollen grains and ovules with mature embryo sac, respectively, allow double fertilization of egg cell and central cell and give rise to seeds. Seeds are important propagation units and source of nutrition for humans [107,108]. There is accumulating evidence that the SMC5/6 complex plays key role in seed development (Figure 2B). Homozygous mutants in multiple complex subunits: SMC5 (alias EMBRYO DEFECTIVE 2782), NSE1 (alias EMBRYO DEFECTIVE 1379), NSE3 and SMC6A SMC6B double mutant do not produce viable seeds [21,42,52,109]. However, NSE2/MMS21 and partially complemented NSE1 and NSE3 homozygous mutants produce 25% to 50% of aberrantly developed seeds and the viability of wild-type-like seeds is reduced [21,97]. Unhealthy seeds contained typically poorly developed, early stage-arrested, embryo and over-proliferated endosperm [21]. Although the mechanism of SMC5/6 complex involvement in seed development is currently unknown, its similarity with the TITAN seed phenotypes of cohesin and condensin mutants [110,111] makes it tempting to speculate that the underlying mechanism arises via combinatorial action of cohesin and SMC5/6 complexes [60] (see chapter 3.2. Removal of replication-derived toxic structures).

4.2. Modulator of Abiotic Stress Responses

It was reported that Arabidopsis NSE2/MMS21 mutants show improved resistance to drought, while NSE2/MMS21 over-expressors are drought hypersensitive [112]. NSE2/MMS21 works as a negative regulator of proline biosynthesis and drought tolerance is associated with higher proline concentrations, which could explain, at least in part, the phenotype observed. One of the responses to drought stress is abscisic acid (ABA) accumulation. NSE2/MMS21 expression is reduced upon ABA treatment. Mutations in NSE2/MMS21 lead to upregulation of ABA-mediated stress responsive genes and to hypersensitivity to ABA, as indicated by stomatal aperture, seed germination and cotyledon greening assays. Finally, ABA-induced accumulation of SUMO-protein conjugates was reduced in NSE2/MMS21 mutant. Altogether, this indicates that NSE2/MMS21 plays a role as negative regulator of ABA-mediated stress response, by SUMOylating ABA responsive gene products (or their transcriptional activators/repressors in a mechanism proposed above for FLC regulation) and thus influences stomata opening [112].

4.3. Suppressor of Immune Responses

Arabidopsis NONEXPRESSER OF PR GENES 1 (NPR1) is a key positive regulator of salicylic acid (SA)-mediated systemic acquired resistance (SAR) pathway essential for defence against microbial pathogens [113,114]. NPR1 function is critical for expression of PATHOGEN RESISTANCE (PR) genes. Among suppressors of npr1 phenotype (i.e., PR genes are up-regulated), mutation in a gene named SUPPRESSOR OF NPR1-1, INDUCIBLE (SNI1) was identified [115]. Recently, purification of the SNI1 complex in Arabidopsis revealed that it interacts with an uncharacterized protein termed ARABIDOPSIS SNI1 ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 1 (ASAP1), SMC5 and SMC6B [42]. Although ASAP1 and SNI1 do not share significant sequence homology with any proteins outside of the plant kingdom, modelling of their structure revealed that they are structurally highly similar to the yeast NSE5 and NSE6, respectively (see Section NSE5-NSE6 sub-complex for details). Hence, ASAP1 and SNI1 are the putative functional orthologues of yeast NSE5 and NSE6 in plants acting as suppressors of SAR by unknown mechanism(s). Screening for SUPPRESSOR OF SNI (SSN), i.e., for the mutations reverting smaller size sni1 mutant plants to a wild-type like phenotype, revealed the following genes: SSN1 (RADIATION SENSITIVE 51D), SSN2 (SWIM DOMAIN CONTAINING SRS2 INTERACTING PROTEIN 1), SSN3 (BREAST CANCER 2A), SSN4 (RADIATION SENSITIVE 17) and ATR [42,94,116,117]. This suggests that either excessive production of SA and/or reduced genome stability in the absence of functional SMC5/6 complex lead to an increased frequency of repair via (possibly error prone) pathway represented by the SSN genes. After disrupting the function of the repair signalling components ATR and RAD17 and their putative downstream SSN effectors, the balance may be re-established, allowing for normal plant growth.

5. Conclusions

Data from fungal, animal and plant models show that SMC5/6 complex operates within a large network controlling the maintenance of post-replicative chromosome structure. The key functions concentrate towards (i) removal of DNA topological stress in a process guided by cohesin complex and (ii) repair of particular types of DNA damage (most likely toxic replication intermediates). However, the SMC5/6 functions may be more diverse as indicated by several other examples mentioned in this review. Furthermore, surprising functions of the SMC5/6 complex are yet to be expected as indicated e.g., by the recent in vitro observation that it organizes microtubules into bundles or acts as a viral suppressor [118,119]. Large portion of the work remains to be done in understanding molecular functions of individual subunits and (often phylogenetic group specific) phenotypes of SMC5/6 complex mutants. In plants, this includes roles of SMC5/6 complex in abiotic and biotic stress responses, developmental control, gametogenesis and sporogenesis.


We thank Ingo Schubert for careful reading and commenting on the manuscript. Both authors acknowledge support from the IEB and the MPIPZ funds during writing this review. M.D. was financially supported by DAAD fellowship A/12/7772.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 2007, 128, 693–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, G.; Hall, T.C.; Holmes-Davis, R. Plant chromatin: Development and gene control. Bioessays 2002, 24, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Branzei, D.; Vanoli, F.; Foiani, M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 2008, 456, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roy, S. Maintenance of genome stability in plants: Repairing DNA double strand breaks and chromatin structure stability. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hu, Z.B.; Cools, T.; De Veylder, L. Mechanisms used by plants to cope with DNA damage. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2016, 67, 439–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Willing, E.M.; Piofczyk, T.; Albert, A.; Winkler, J.B.; Schneeberger, K.; Pecinka, A. UVR2 ensures transgenerational genome stability under simulated natural UV-B in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Balestrazzi, A.; Confalonieri, M.; Macovei, A.; Dona, M.; Carbonera, D. Genotoxic stress and DNA repair in plants: Emerging functions and tools for improving crop productivity. Plant. Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. De Piccoli, G.; Torres-Rosell, J.; Aragon, L. The unnamed complex: What do we know about Smc5-Smc6? Chromosome Res. 2009, 17, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hirano, T. At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Losada, A.; Hirano, T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: The first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev. 2005, 19, 1269–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jeppsson, K.; Kanno, T.; Shirahige, K.; Sjogren, C. The maintenance of chromosome structure: Positioning and functioning of SMC complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Uhlmann, F. SMC complexes: From DNA to chromosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kanno, T.; Berta, D.G.; Sjogren, C. The Smc5/6 complex is an ATP-dependent intermolecular DNA linker. Cell Rep. 2015, 12, 1471–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sergeant, J.; Taylor, E.; Palecek, J.; Fousteri, M.; Andrews, E.A.; Sweeney, S.; Shinagawa, H.; Watts, F.Z.; Lehmann, A.R. Composition and architecture of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad18 (Smc5-6) complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Duan, X.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Y.H.; Arenz, J.; Rangi, G.K.; Zhao, X.; Ye, H. Architecture of the Smc5/6 Complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reveals a Unique Interaction between the Nse5-6 Subcomplex and the Hinge Regions of Smc5 and Smc6. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 8507–8515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Palecek, J.; Vidot, S.; Feng, M.; Doherty, A.J.; Lehmann, A.R. The Smc5-Smc6 DNA repair complex. bridging of the Smc5-Smc6 heads by the KLEISIN, Nse4, and non-Kleisin subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36952–36959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fujioka, Y.; Kimata, Y.; Nomaguchi, K.; Watanabe, K.; Kohno, K. Identification of a novel non-structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) component of the SMC5-SMC6 complex involved in DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21585–21591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McDonald, W.H.; Pavlova, Y.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Boddy, M.N. Novel essential DNA repair proteins Nse1 and Nse2 are subunits of the fission yeast Smc5-Smc6 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 45460–45467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Taylor, E.M.; Copsey, A.C.; Hudson, J.J.; Vidot, S.; Lehmann, A.R. Identification of the proteins, including MAGEG1, that make up the human SMC5-6 protein complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 1197–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pebernard, S.; Perry, J.J.; Tainer, J.A.; Boddy, M.N. Nse1 RING-like domain supports functions of the Smc5-Smc6 holocomplex in genome stability. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008, 19, 4099–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, G.; Zou, W.; Jian, L.; Qian, J.; Deng, Y.; Zhao, J. Non-SMC elements 1 and 3 are required for early embryo and seedling development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 1039–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hudson, J.J.; Bednarova, K.; Kozakova, L.; Liao, C.; Guerineau, M.; Colnaghi, R.; Vidot, S.; Marek, J.; Bathula, S.R.; Lehmann, A.R.; et al. Interactions between the Nse3 and Nse4 components of the SMC5-6 complex identify evolutionarily conserved interactions between MAGE and EID Families. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zabrady, K.; Adamus, M.; Vondrova, L.; Liao, C.; Skoupilova, H.; Novakova, M.; Jurcisinova, L.; Alt, A.; Oliver, A.W.; Lehmann, A.R.; et al. Chromatin association of the SMC5/6 complex is dependent on binding of its NSE3 subunit to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 1064–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Doyle, J.M.; Gao, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, M.; Potts, P.R. MAGE-RING protein complexes comprise a family of E3 ubiquitin ligases. Mol. Cell 2010, 39, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chomez, P.; De Backer, O.; Bertrand, M.; De Plaen, E.; Boon, T.; Lucas, S. An overview of the MAGE gene family with the identification of all human members of the family. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 5544–5551. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Barker, P.A.; Salehi, A. The MAGE proteins: Emerging roles in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and neurogenetic disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2002, 67, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weon, J.L.; Potts, P.R. The MAGE protein family and cancer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015, 37, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schleiffer, A.; Kaitna, S.; Maurer-Stroh, S.; Glotzer, M.; Nasmyth, K.; Eisenhaber, F. Kleisins: A superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prakash, S.; Prakash, L. Increased spontaneous mitotic segregation in MMS-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1977, 87, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Zhao, X.L.; Blobel, G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4777–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Xu, P.; Yuan, D.; Liu, M.; Li, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yao, N.; Yang, C. AtMMS21, an SMC5/6 complex subunit, is involved in stem cell niche maintenance and DNA damage responses in Arabidopsis roots. Plant. Physiol. 2013, 161, 1755–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Potts, P.R.; Yu, H. Human MMS21/NSE2 is a SUMO ligase required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 7021–7032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hay, R.T. SUMO: A history of modification. Mol. Cell 2005, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jalal, D.; Chalissery, J.; Hassan, A.H. Genome maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The role of SUMO and SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 2242–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Andrews, E.A.; Palecek, J.; Sergeant, J.; Taylor, E.; Lehmann, A.R.; Watts, F.Z. Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. McAleenan, A.; Cordon-Preciado, V.; Clemente-Blanco, A.; Liu, I.C.; Sen, N.; Leonard, J.; Jarmuz, A.; Aragon, L. SUMOylation of the alpha-kleisin subunit of cohesin is required for DNA damage-induced cohesion. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1564–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Potts, P.R.; Yu, H. The SMC5/6 complex maintains telomere length in ALT cancer cells through SUMOylation of telomere-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Potts, P.R.; Porteus, M.H.; Yu, H. Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 3377–3388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ishida, T.; Fujiwara, S.; Miura, K.; Stacey, N.; Yoshimura, M.; Schneider, K.; Adachi, S.; Minamisawa, K.; Umeda, M.; Sugimoto, K. SUMO E3 ligase HIGH PLOIDY2 regulates endocycle onset and meristem maintenance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2284–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, L.; Yang, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, M.; Lai, J.; Qi, Y.; Shi, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Q.; et al. The Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase AtMMS21, a homologue of NSE2/MMS21, regulates cell proliferation in the root. Plant J. 2009, 60, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pebernard, S.; Wohlschlegel, J.; McDonald, W.H.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Boddy, M.N. The Nse5-Nse6 dimer mediates DNA repair roles of the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 1617–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yan, S.; Wang, W.; Marques, J.; Mohan, R.; Saleh, A.; Durrant, W.E.; Song, J.; Dong, X. Salicylic acid activates DNA damage responses to potentiate plant immunity. Mol. Cell 2013, 52, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Raschle, M.; Smeenk, G.; Hansen, R.K.; Temu, T.; Oka, Y.; Hein, M.Y.; Nagaraj, N.; Long, D.T.; Walter, J.C.; Hofmann, K.; et al. DNA repair. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 2015, 348, 1253671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huber, A.H.; Nelson, W.J.; Weis, W.I. Three-dimensional structure of the armadillo repeat region of beta-catenin. Cell 1997, 90, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fousteri, M.I.; Lehmann, A.R. A novel SMC protein complex in Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains the Rad18 DNA repair protein. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 1691–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lehmann, A.R.; Walicka, M.; Griffiths, D.J.; Murray, J.M.; Watts, F.Z.; McCready, S.; Carr, A.M. The rad18 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe defines a new subgroup of the SMC superfamily involved in DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 7067–7080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mengiste, T.; Revenkova, E.; Bechtold, N.; Paszkowski, J. An SMC-like protein is required for efficient homologous recombination in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 4505–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Santa Maria, S.R.; Gangavarapu, V.; Johnson, R.E.; Prakash, L.; Prakash, S. Requirement of Nse1, a subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, for Rad52-dependent postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 8409–8418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kegel, A.; Sjogren, C. The Smc5/6 complex: More than repair? Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2010, 75, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, N.; Yu, H. The Smc complexes in DNA damage response. Cell Biosci. 2012, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Potts, P.R. The Yin and Yang of the MMS21-SMC5/6 SUMO ligase complex in homologous recombination. DNA Repair 2009, 8, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Watanabe, K.; Pacher, M.; Dukowic, S.; Schubert, V.; Puchta, H.; Schubert, I. The STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES 5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid alignment and homologous recombination after DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 2688–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, C.H.; Finke, A.; Diaz, M.; Rozhon, W.; Poppenberger, B.; Baubec, T.; Pecinka, A. Repair of DNA damage induced by the cytidine analog zebularine requires ATR and ATM in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1788–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yuan, D.; Lai, J.; Xu, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Du, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, C. AtMMS21 regulates DNA damage response and homologous recombination repair in Arabidopsis. DNA Repair 2014, 21, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Pecinka, A.; Liu, C.H. Drugs for plant chromosome and chromatin research. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2014, 143, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Baubec, T.; Finke, A.; Mittelsten Scheid, O.; Pecinka, A. Meristem-specific expression of epigenetic regulators safeguards transposon silencing in Arabidopsis. EMBO Rep. 2014, 15, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Baubec, T.; Pecinka, A.; Rozhon, W.; Mittelsten Scheid, O. Effective, homogeneous and transient interference with cytosine methylation in plant genomic DNA by zebularine. Plant J. 2009, 57, 542–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Finke, A.; Pecinka, A.; Institute of Experimental Botany A.S. C.R., Rozvojová, Czech Republic. Unpublished work. 2018.
  59. Outwin, E.A.; Irmisch, A.; Murray, J.M.; O’Connell, M.J. Smc5-Smc6-dependent removal of cohesin from mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2009, 29, 4363–4375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jeppsson, K.; Carlborg, K.K.; Nakato, R.; Berta, D.G.; Lilienthal, I.; Kanno, T.; Lindqvist, A.; Brink, M.C.; Dantuma, N.P.; Katou, Y.; et al. The chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex depends on cohesion and predicts the level of sister chromatid entanglement. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lindroos, H.B.; Strom, L.; Itoh, T.; Katou, Y.; Shirahige, K.; Sjogren, C. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. De Piccoli, G.; Cortes-Ledesma, F.; Ira, G.; Torres-Rosell, J.; Uhle, S.; Farmer, S.; Hwang, J.Y.; Machin, F.; Ceschia, A.; McAleenan, A.; et al. Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 1032–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Strom, L.; Karlsson, C.; Lindroos, H.B.; Wedahl, S.; Katou, Y.; Shirahige, K.; Sjogren, C. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 2007, 317, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hanin, M.; Mengiste, T.; Bogucki, A.; Paszkowski, J. Elevated levels of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in Arabidopsis overexpressing the MIM gene. Plant J. 2000, 24, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Stephan, A.K.; Kliszczak, M.; Dodson, H.; Cooley, C.; Morrison, C.G. Roles of vertebrate Smc5 in sister chromatid cohesion and homologous recombinational repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011, 31, 1369–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cimprich, K.A.; Cortez, D. ATR: An essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Garcia, V.; Bruchet, H.; Camescasse, D.; Granier, F.; Bouchez, D.; Tissier, A. AtATM is essential for meiosis and the somatic response to DNA damage in plants. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Culligan, K.M.; Robertson, C.E.; Foreman, J.; Doerner, P.; Britt, A.B. ATR and ATM play both distinct and additive roles in response to ionizing radiation. Plant J. 2006, 48, 947–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Roitinger, E.; Hofer, M.; Kocher, T.; Pichler, P.; Novatchkova, M.; Yang, J.; Schlogelhofer, P.; Mechtler, K. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and rad3-related (ATR) dependent DNA damage response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2015, 14, 556–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kilian, J.; Whitehead, D.; Horak, J.; Wanke, D.; Weinl, S.; Batistic, O.; D'Angelo, C.; Bornberg-Bauer, E.; Kudla, J.; Harter, K. The AtGenExpress global stress expression data set: Protocols, evaluation and model data analysis of UV-B light, drought and cold stress responses. Plant J. 2007, 50, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Devos, K.M.; Brown, J.K.; Bennetzen, J.L. Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 1075–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ampatzidou, E.; Irmisch, A.; O'Connell, M.J.; Murray, J.M. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 9387–9401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Torres-Rosell, J.; Machin, F.; Farmer, S.; Jarmuz, A.; Eydmann, T.; Dalgaard, J.Z.; Aragon, L. SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hwang, J.Y.; Smith, S.; Ceschia, A.; Torres-Rosell, J.; Aragon, L.; Myung, K. Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA Repair 2008, 7, 1426–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Menolfi, D.; Delamarre, A.; Lengronne, A.; Pasero, P.; Branzei, D. Essential roles of the Smc5/6 complex in replication through natural pausing sites and endogenous DNA damage tolerance. Mol. Cell 2015, 60, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chiolo, I.; Minoda, A.; Colmenares, S.U.; Polyzos, A.; Costes, S.V.; Karpen, G.H. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 2011, 144, 732–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ryu, T.; Spatola, B.; Delabaere, L.; Bowlin, K.; Hopp, H.; Kunitake, R.; Karpen, G.H.; Chiolo, I. Heterochromatic breaks move to the nuclear periphery to continue recombinational repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 1401–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Torres-Rosell, J.; Sunjevaric, I.; De Piccoli, G.; Sacher, M.; Eckert-Boulet, N.; Reid, R.; Jentsch, S.; Rothstein, R.; Aragon, L.; Lisby, M. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kozak, J.; West, C.E.; White, C.; da Costa-Nunes, J.A.; Angelis, K.J. Rapid repair of DNA double strand breaks in Arabidopsis thaliana is dependent on proteins involved in chromosome structure maintenance. DNA Repair 2009, 8, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Branzei, D.; Sollier, J.; Liberi, G.; Zhao, X.; Maeda, D.; Seki, M.; Enomoto, T.; Ohta, K.; Foiani, M. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 2006, 127, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. DiNardo, S.; Voelkel, K.; Sternglanz, R. DNA topoisomerase II mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Topoisomerase II is required for segregation of daughter molecules at the termination of DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 2616–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Bermejo, R.; Doksani, Y.; Capra, T.; Katou, Y.M.; Tanaka, H.; Shirahige, K.; Foiani, M. Top1- and Top2-mediated topological transitions at replication forks ensure fork progression and stability and prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation. Genes Dev. 2007, 21, 1921–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kegel, A.; Betts-Lindroos, H.; Kanno, T.; Jeppsson, K.; Strom, L.; Katou, Y.; Itoh, T.; Shirahige, K.; Sjogren, C. Chromosome length influences replication-induced topological stress. Nature 2011, 471, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Gallego-Paez, L.M.; Tanaka, H.; Bando, M.; Takahashi, M.; Nozaki, N.; Nakato, R.; Shirahige, K.; Hirota, T. Smc5/6-mediated regulation of replication progression contributes to chromosome assembly during mitosis in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 2014, 25, 302–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cohen-Fix, O. The making and breaking of sister chromatid cohesion. Cell 2001, 106, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Schubert, V.; Klatte, M.; Pecinka, A.; Meister, A.; Jasencakova, Z.; Schubert, I. Sister chromatids are often incompletely aligned in meristematic and endopolyploid interphase nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2006, 172, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bermudez-Lopez, M.; Ceschia, A.; de Piccoli, G.; Colomina, N.; Pasero, P.; Aragon, L.; Torres-Rosell, J. The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 6502–6512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bermudez-Lopez, M.; Villoria, M.T.; Esteras, M.; Jarmuz, A.; Torres-Rosell, J.; Clemente-Blanco, A.; Aragon, L. Sgs1’s roles in DNA end resection, HJ dissolution, and crossover suppression require a two-step SUMO regulation dependent on Smc5/6. Genes Dev. 2016, 30, 1339–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bonner, J.N.; Choi, K.; Xue, X.; Torres, N.P.; Szakal, B.; Wei, L.; Wan, B.; Arter, M.; Matos, J.; Sung, P.; et al. Smc5/6 mediated sumoylation of the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 complex promotes removal of recombination intermediates. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bermudez-Lopez, M.; Aragon, L. Smc5/6 complex regulates Sgs1 recombination functions. Curr. Genet. 2017, 63, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Choi, K.; Szakal, B.; Chen, Y.H.; Branzei, D.; Zhao, X. The Smc5/6 complex and Esc2 influence multiple replication-associated recombination processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21, 2306–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chen, Y.H.; Choi, K.; Szakal, B.; Arenz, J.; Duan, X.; Ye, H.; Branzei, D.; Zhao, X. Interplay between the Smc5/6 complex and the Mph1 helicase in recombinational repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21252–21257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Schmid, M.; Davison, T.S.; Henz, S.R.; Pape, U.J.; Demar, M.; Vingron, M.; Scholkopf, B.; Weigel, D.; Lohmann, J.U. A gene expression map of Arabidopsis thaliana development. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Song, J.; Durrant, W.E.; Wang, S.; Yan, S.; Tan, E.H.; Dong, X. DNA repair proteins are directly involved in regulation of gene expression during plant immune response. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ishida, T.; Yoshimura, M.; Miura, K.; Sugimoto, K. MMS21/HPY2 and SIZ1, two Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligases, have distinct functions in development. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kwak, J.S.; Son, G.H.; Kim, S.I.; Song, J.T.; Seo, H.S. Arabidopsis HIGH PLOIDY2 Sumoylates and Stabilizes Flowering Locus C through Its E3 Ligase Activity. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Liu, M.; Shi, S.F.; Zhang, S.C.; Xu, P.L.; Lai, J.B.; Liu, Y.Y.; Yuan, D.K.; Wang, Y.Q.; Du, J.J.; Yang, C.W. SUMO E3 ligase AtMMS21 is required for normal meiosis and gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant. Biol. 2014, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kimura, S.; Sakaguchi, K. DNA repair in plants. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Yadav, R.K.; Girke, T.; Pasala, S.; Xie, M.; Reddy, G.V. Gene expression map of the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem stem cell niche. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 4941–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Diaz, M.; Pecinka, A. Seeds as emerging hotspot for maintenance of genome stability. Cytol. Focus 2017, 82, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, Y.; Lai, J.; Yu, M.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, J.; Hu, H.; Wu, Q.; Lu, G.; Xu, P.; et al. The Arabidopsis SUMO E3 ligase AtMMS21 dissociates the E2Fa/DPa complex in cell cycle regulation. Plant Cell 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhang, J.; Lai, J.; Wang, F.; Yang, S.; He, Z.; Jiang, J.; Li, Q.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yu, M.; et al. A SUMO Ligase AtMMS21 Regulates the Stability of the Chromatin Remodeler BRAHMA in Root Development. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1574–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Andres, F.; Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mylne, J.S.; Barrett, L.; Tessadori, F.; Mesnage, S.; Johnson, L.; Bernatavichute, Y.V.; Jacobsen, S.E.; Fransz, P.; Dean, C. LHP1, the Arabidopsis homologue of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, is required for epigenetic silencing of FLC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5012–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bastow, R.; Mylne, J.S.; Lister, C.; Lippman, Z.; Martienssen, R.A.; Dean, C. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature 2004, 427, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Schubert, D.; Primavesi, L.; Bishopp, A.; Roberts, G.; Doonan, J.; Jenuwein, T.; Goodrich, J. Silencing by plant Polycomb-group genes requires dispersed trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 4638–4649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tanksley, S.D.; McCouch, S.R. Seed banks and molecular maps: Unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 1997, 277, 1063–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bewley, J.D. Seed Germination and Dormancy. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. McElver, J.; Tzafrir, I.; Aux, G.; Rogers, R.; Ashby, C.; Smith, K.; Thomas, C.; Schetter, A.; Zhou, Q.; Cushman, M.A.; et al. Insertional mutagenesis of genes required for seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2001, 159, 1751–1763. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Liu, C.M.; McElver, J.; Tzafrir, I.; Joosen, R.; Wittich, P.; Patton, D.; Van Lammeren, A.A.; Meinke, D. Condensin and cohesin knockouts in Arabidopsis exhibit a titan seed phenotype. Plant J. 2002, 29, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tzafrir, I.; McElver, J.A.; Liu Cm, C.M.; Yang, L.J.; Wu, J.Q.; Martinez, A.; Patton, D.A.; Meinke, D.W. Diversity of TITAN functions in Arabidopsis seed development. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 38–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhang, S.; Qi, Y.; Liu, M.; Yang, C. SUMO E3 ligase AtMMS21 regulates drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana(F). J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Cao, H.; Glazebrook, J.; Clarke, J.D.; Volko, S.; Dong, X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 1997, 88, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ryals, J.; Weymann, K.; Lawton, K.; Friedrich, L.; Ellis, D.; Steiner, H.Y.; Johnson, J.; Delaney, T.P.; Jesse, T.; Vos, P.; et al. The Arabidopsis NIM1 protein shows homology to the mammalian transcription factor inhibitor I kappa B. Plant Cell 1997, 9, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Clarke, J.D.; Li, Y.; Dong, X. Identification and cloning of a negative regulator of systemic acquired resistance, SNI1, through a screen for suppressors of npr1-1. Cell 1999, 98, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Durrant, W.E.; Wang, S.; Dong, X.N. Arabidopsis SNI1 and RAD51D regulate both gene transcription and DNA recombination during the defense response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 4223–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, S.; Durrant, W.E.; Song, J.; Spivey, N.W.; Dong, X. Arabidopsis BRCA2 and RAD51 proteins are specifically involved in defense gene transcription during plant immune responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 22716–22721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Decorsiere, A.; Mueller, H.; van Breugel, P.C.; Abdul, F.; Gerossier, L.; Beran, R.K.; Livingston, C.M.; Niu, C.; Fletcher, S.P.; Hantz, O.; et al. Hepatitis B virus X protein identifies the Smc5/6 complex as a host restriction factor. Nature 2016, 531, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Laflamme, G.; Tremblay-Boudreault, T.; Roy, M.A.; Andersen, P.; Bonneil, E.; Atchia, K.; Thibault, P.; D'Amours, D.; Kwok, B.H. Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) proteins link microtubule stability to genome integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 27418–27431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) 5/6 complex composition and functions. (A) Consensual model of SMC5/6 complex without and (B) with species-specific positions of NON-SMC ELEMENT (NSE) 5(-like) and NSE6(-like) subunits in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana and Homo sapiens. (C) Hypothetical function of NSE5-NSE6 dimer in multimerizing SMC5/6 complexes via their heads (top) or hinges (bottom). (D) Replication intermediate structure bypassing DNA damage site (red square). (E) Topological stress occurring during DNA replication and at replication fork barriers (RFBs) represented by the positive supercoil (+SC) ahead of the replication fork and sister chromatid intertwining (SCIs) between the nascent chromatids. (F) Role of SMC5/6 complex in telomere length maintenance. (G) Speculative model for SUMOylation of transcriptional modulations by SMC5/6 complex. Note that the position of SMC5/6 complex in images (C), (E), (F) and (G) is only speculative.
Figure 1. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) 5/6 complex composition and functions. (A) Consensual model of SMC5/6 complex without and (B) with species-specific positions of NON-SMC ELEMENT (NSE) 5(-like) and NSE6(-like) subunits in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana and Homo sapiens. (C) Hypothetical function of NSE5-NSE6 dimer in multimerizing SMC5/6 complexes via their heads (top) or hinges (bottom). (D) Replication intermediate structure bypassing DNA damage site (red square). (E) Topological stress occurring during DNA replication and at replication fork barriers (RFBs) represented by the positive supercoil (+SC) ahead of the replication fork and sister chromatid intertwining (SCIs) between the nascent chromatids. (F) Role of SMC5/6 complex in telomere length maintenance. (G) Speculative model for SUMOylation of transcriptional modulations by SMC5/6 complex. Note that the position of SMC5/6 complex in images (C), (E), (F) and (G) is only speculative.
Genes 09 00036 g001
Figure 2. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) 5/6 complex in plants. (A) Log2 mRNA intensity values of genes encoding SMC5/6 complex in 49 Arabidopsis developmental stages. The primary ATH1 expression array data were derived from AtGenExpress dataset [93]. Please note that the NSE1 and NSE4A are missing on ATH1 array. (B) Overview of SMC5/6 complex functions in Arabidopsis.
Figure 2. Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) 5/6 complex in plants. (A) Log2 mRNA intensity values of genes encoding SMC5/6 complex in 49 Arabidopsis developmental stages. The primary ATH1 expression array data were derived from AtGenExpress dataset [93]. Please note that the NSE1 and NSE4A are missing on ATH1 array. (B) Overview of SMC5/6 complex functions in Arabidopsis.
Genes 09 00036 g002
Table 1. Overview of Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex 5/6 subunits in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), human (Homo sapiens) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). NA-information not available.
Table 1. Overview of Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complex 5/6 subunits in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), human (Homo sapiens) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). NA-information not available.
S. cerevisiaeS. pombeD. megalonasterH. sapiensA. thaliana
Table 2. Overview of SMC5/6 complex subunits in plants. The species are represented by spreading earthmoss (Physcomitrella patens), Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa (rice) and Hordeum vulgare (barley), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). The number of gene identifiers indicates the number of copies per genome. * Functional (not protein sequence-based) homologs. Letters next to S. lycopersicum genes indicate transcript [94] in roots (R), leaves (L), flower buds (Fb), open flowers (Fl) and fruits (Fr). Transcriptional data for Arabidopsis are provided in Figure 2A. Genes for P. patens, B. distachyon, O. sativa and H. vulgare were identified by BLAST searches in Phytozome, for tomato in the Sol Genomics Network database ( and for Arabidopsis in TAIR (
Table 2. Overview of SMC5/6 complex subunits in plants. The species are represented by spreading earthmoss (Physcomitrella patens), Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa (rice) and Hordeum vulgare (barley), Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis). The number of gene identifiers indicates the number of copies per genome. * Functional (not protein sequence-based) homologs. Letters next to S. lycopersicum genes indicate transcript [94] in roots (R), leaves (L), flower buds (Fb), open flowers (Fl) and fruits (Fr). Transcriptional data for Arabidopsis are provided in Figure 2A. Genes for P. patens, B. distachyon, O. sativa and H. vulgare were identified by BLAST searches in Phytozome, for tomato in the Sol Genomics Network database ( and for Arabidopsis in TAIR (
SubunitP. patensB. distachyonO. sativaH. vulgareS. lycopersicum A. thaliana
Pp3c24_4940Bradi2g14160LOC_Os05g51790HORVU1Hr1G095230Solyc01g087720L, FrAt5g15920
Pp3c11_11190Bradi4g08527LOC_Os09g03370HORVU5Hr1G050720Solyc05g051680R, L, Fl, FrAt5g07660
Pp3c20_10070Bradi4g43810LOC_Os12g03360HORVU0Hr1G010660Solyc01g006210R, L, Fl, FrAT5G21140
Pp3c22_18560Bradi2g16600LOC_Os05g48880HORVU1Hr1G087520Solyc07g062780R, L, Fl, Fr
Bradi2g16580 At3g15150
Pp3c15_18480Bradi1g58440LOC_Os07g05650HORVU2Hr1G060140Solyc10g018870R, L, Fl, FrAt1g34770
Pp3c27_130Bradi3g06970LOC_Os02g10090HORVU7Hr1G094270Solyc10g078730R, L, Fl, FrAT1G51130
LOC_Os08g40010 Solyc01g006460FbAt3g20760
LOC_Os02g29620 Solyc04g025510L, Fl buds
Pp3c4_7040Bradi2g08380LOC_Os01g13940HORVU3Hr1G032750Solyc11g066340R, L, Fl, FrAt2g28130
Pp3c13_1090Bradi3g11450LOC_Os02g20870HORVU6Hr1G054340Solyc02g077320R, L, Fl, FrAt4g18470

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diaz, M.; Pecinka, A. Scaffolding for Repair: Understanding Molecular Functions of the SMC5/6 Complex. Genes 2018, 9, 36.

AMA Style

Diaz M, Pecinka A. Scaffolding for Repair: Understanding Molecular Functions of the SMC5/6 Complex. Genes. 2018; 9(1):36.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diaz, Mariana, and Ales Pecinka. 2018. "Scaffolding for Repair: Understanding Molecular Functions of the SMC5/6 Complex" Genes 9, no. 1: 36.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop