Next Article in Journal
IGF-1 Signalling Regulates Mitochondria Dynamics and Turnover through a Conserved GSK-3β–Nrf2–BNIP3 Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of CNS Injury-Related microRNAs as Novel Toll-Like Receptor 7/8 Signaling Activators by Small RNA Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
pH-Dependent Aggregation in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Is Determined by Charge and Lipophilicity
Previous Article in Special Issue
MicroRNAs: Biological Regulators in Pathogen–Host Interactions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/cells9010146
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

miR-26a is Involved in Glycometabolism and Affects Boar Sperm Viability by Targeting PDHX

by
Wencan Wang
1,†,
Kai Liang
1,†,
Yu Chang
1,
Mingxia Ran
1,
Yan Zhang
1,
Malik Ahsan Ali
1,2,
Dinghui Dai
1,
Izhar Hyder Qazi
1,3,
Ming Zhang
1,
Guangbin Zhou
1,
Jiandong Yang
1,
Christiana Angel
4,5 and
Changjun Zeng
1,*
1
College of Animal Sciences and Technology, and Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Department of Theriogenology, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
Department of Veterinary Anatomy & Histology, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sakrand 67210, Pakistan
4
College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
5
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Sakrand 67210, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2020, 9(1), 146; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010146
Submission received: 3 December 2019 / Revised: 26 December 2019 / Accepted: 27 December 2019 / Published: 8 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Regulatory Functions of microRNAs)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

miR-26a is associated with sperm metabolism and can affect sperm motility and apoptosis. However, how miR-26a affects sperm motility remains largely unknown. Our previous study indicated that the PDHX gene is predicted to be a potential target of miR-26a, which is responsible for pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation which is considered as a key step for connecting glycolysis with oxidative phosphorylation. In this study, we first reported a potential relationship between miR-26a and PDHX and their expressions in fresh, frozen-thawed, and epididymal boar sperm. Then, sperm viability and survival were determined after transfection of miR-26a. mRNA and protein expression level of PDHX in the liquid-preserved boar sperm after transfection were also determined by RT-qPCR and Western Blot (WB). Our results showed that expression level of PDHX was significantly increased during sperm transit from epididymal caput to corpus and cauda. Similarly, expression of PDHX was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in fresh sperm as compared to epididymal cauda and frozen-thawed sperm. However, the expression of miR-26a in epididymal corpus sperm was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of caput and cauda sperm. Furthermore, after transfection of boar sperm with miR-26a mimic and inhibitor under liquid storage, the lowest and highest sperm viability was observed in miR-26a mimic and inhibitor treatment (P < 0.05), respectively. The protein levels of PDHX, after 24 and 48 h of transfection of miR-26a mimics and inhibitor, were notably decreased and increased (P < 0.05), respectively, as compared to negative control (NC) group. In conclusion, the novel and enticing findings of our study provide a reasonable evidence that miR-26a via PDHX, a link between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, could regulate the glycometabolic pathway which eventually affect boar sperm viability and survival.

1. Introduction

Following spermatogenesis in testes, sperm undergo distinct post-gonadal phases of differentiation and maturation while transiting in the epididymis and subsequently attain maturity and progressive motility [1,2]. It has been suggested that under liquid storage conditions sperm exhibit morphological and functional changes similar to natural aging process along with apoptotic-like changes [3,4]. Cryopreservation is believed to result in structural and functional losses in sperm, leading to decreased overall sperm quality and fertilizing ability [5,6]. It has also been demonstrated that long-term cryopreservation of sperm significantly affects the motility-related parameters, apoptotic ratio and oxidation levels compared to those that are exposed to short-term cryopreservation [7]. Similarly, the metabolic activity of frozen-thawed sperm is inhibited, which contributes to the decreased sperm motility [8]. Sperm metabolism is an essential process by which sperm obtain energy via utilizing the substances dissolved in seminal plasma and cytosol. Furthermore, it plays an important role in maintaining normal function of sperm such as motility, survival and fertility [9,10]. Therefore, the metabolic activity of sperm is crucial for sustaining its survival and movement. However, due to the lower endogenous sugar content, sperm rely mainly on the exogenous sugar sources to fulfill energy requirements [11,12].
Sperm utilizes two metabolic pathways for producing energy, namely glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation [13]. The sperm’s preference for energy metabolic pathways is believed to be species-specific. Sperm of different species prefer different sugar sources for glycolysis. For instance, pig and human sperm prefer glucose over fructose and dog’s sperm prefers fructose to produce pyruvate [12,14,15]. Under anaerobic conditions, the pyruvate can be converted to lactic acid via lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). However, under aerobic conditions, pyruvate oxidative decarboxylation catalyzed by pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) which is a key step in connecting glycolysis with oxidative phosphorylation [16]. Specifically, pyruvate is transported into the mitochondrial matrix via voltage-gated channels and mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) complex in the outer and inner mitochondrial membrane respectively, where pyruvate undergoes oxidative decarboxylation in the presence of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) to produce acetyl-CoA, one of the substrates of tricarboxylic acid cycle [17]. E3-binding protein (E3BP) is a structural subunit of PDHC, which is coded by pyruvate dehydrogenase complex component X (PDHX) [18,19]. E3BP shows a higher degree of homology to dihydrolipoamide transacetylase (E2), which plays a critical role in linking two catalytic subunits i.e., E2 and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3) [20]. Although E3BP does not seems to have a catalytic function, it is essential for PDHC for performing its normal function [21]. Previous studies have shown that, patients with metabolic lactic acidosis, developmental retardation, and neurodegenerative diseases, exhibited defects and mutations in genes implicated in PDH pathway [22]. In 1990, Robinson and colleagues reported E3BP deficiency for the first time [23]. Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated that the occurrence of mutations in PDHX gene are due to PDH deficiency [24,25,26]. In addition, PDHX is inhibited by miR-27b and regulates the metabolic proliferation of breast cancer cells, which leads to reduced patient survival [27].
Species-specific differences seem to exist in energy metabolism, glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation pathways in sperm. For instance, sperm motility and fertilizing ability of bulls and sheep decreases after inhibiting the mitochondrial respiratory chain, suggesting that the oxidative phosphorylation may serve as a major energy metabolism pathway in both species [28,29]. Guinea pigs have higher rates of aerobic respiration and glycolysis [30]. Similarly, human and mouse sperm rely mainly on glycolysis for producing ATP and resultant energy [31,32]. However, the energy metabolism pathway in boar sperm is still incompletely understood and remains as a matter of ongoing debate. Some researchers have argued that glycolysis is the main energy metabolism pathway for boar sperm [33]. However, Nevo and colleagues [34] have reported that, under anaerobic conditions, even in the presence of glucose and fructose, boar sperm showed no progressive motility, and only a slight flagellar swing was observed, indicating that glycolysis alone was not sufficient to fulfill the energy requirements, and therefore highlighting that oxidative phosphorylation might be an essential metabolic pathway adopted by boar sperm.
It is well known that microRNAs (miRNAs) act as the important post-transcriptional regulators by inhibiting the mRNA translation or by modulating the mRNA degradation, and only a few miRNAs have been found to be implicated in regulating the sperm motility, such as let-7a, -7d, -7e and miR-22 [35]. In addition, miRNAs can also affect boar sperm motility via regulating sperm apoptosis. Apoptosis plays a vital role in the process of differentiation of germ cells into mature sperm and eventually participate in fertilization and decay of these sperm [36,37]. Sperm apoptosis has an adverse effect on sperm vitality both in in vivo and in vitro and is considered as one of the critical factors affecting the fecundity in humans and animals [38,39,40]. It was reported that let-7g-5p can regulate the apoptosis in boar sperm by targeting PMAIP1 gene, resulting in low motility of sperm [41]. miR-98, miR-181, miR-19, miR-504, and miR-676 are also involved in sperm apoptosis by regulating their target genes such as FAS, Bcl-2, PTEN, and p53, respectively, and thereby affecting the sperm motility and survival [42]. Furthermore, it has bene reported that down-regulated let-7b-5p can repress sperm glycolysis by targeting AURKB and results in decreased sperm motility [43].
miR-26a is a functional miRNA which is widely expressed in different bodily tissues [44,45,46], and also plays a vital role in regulating sperm metabolism and apoptosis. Huang et al. [47] reported that miR-26a affects the semen quality of Holstein bulls by negatively regulating the expression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase-1 (PCK1), a main gene involved in glycometabolism. Moreover, transcriptomic analysis has suggested that miR-26a is also implicated in bull sperm motility [48]. However, miR-26a regulates boar sperm apoptosis by targeting PTEN gene and has a link with decreased sperm motility [41]. Intriguingly, it has been reported that the expression level of miR-26a in highly motile frozen-thawed sperm was significantly higher as compared to the low-motile frozen-thawed sperm [49]. These results provide reasonable evidence that miR-26a may be involved in regulating the sperm metabolism and apoptosis, and in turn can affect sperm motility and survival. However, whether there are other metabolic regulatory pathways of miR-26a exist or not requires further exploration.
In our previous work, we have shown that miR-26a is related to boar sperm motility [42]. However, whether PDHX is involved or not, as a bridge between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, in the regulation of sperm energy metabolism, motility and survival remains largely unknown. Thus, we have first determined the link between miR-26a and PDHX gene by dual luciferase assay, and then expressions of PDHX and miR-26a were evaluated in boar epididymal (caput, corpus, and cauda), fresh, and frozen-thawed sperm. Finally, we transfected miR-26a into boar sperm, and then viability, mRNA and protein expression of PDHX of sperm were evaluated under liquid storage conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Ethics Statement

Seven healthy and sexually mature Landrace boars were humanely euthanized by electrical stunning method to minimize all means of discomfort. All procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the Regulations of the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology, China, revised in June 2004) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in the College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, China, under permit No. DKY2018202013.

2.2. Sperm Collection and Treatment

Immediately after euthanasia of each boar (n = 7), epididymides were carefully collected and processed within three hours. Boar sperm from epididymal caput, corpus, and cauda were collected according to the procedures described by Saenz et al. [50] with some modifications. Briefly, sperm were flushed from epididymis using RNase-free PBS and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Fresh sperm samples (n = 5) were collected by a manual collection method from five sexually mature Landrace boars. Only ejaculates exhibiting more than 80% sperm motility, normal morphology, and above 1 × 108 mL−1 concentration of sperm were used. Then, these ejaculates were equally divided into three treatment aliquots. The first aliquot was directly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C; second aliquot was directly diluted for transfection experiment, and third aliquot was cryopreserved.

2.3. Primers Design

All primers were designed according to counterparts in GenBank using NCBI Primer-Blast search or from published literatures (Table 1). U6 and GAPDH were used as reference genes for miRNA and mRNA expression analyses, respectively.

2.4. Target Prediction of miR-26a and Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay

Four tools, TargetScan [51], miRanda [52], miRWalk [53], and picTar [54] were used to predict the target genes of miR-26a based on the seed region of miR-26a and 3′-UTR of PDHX. The wild type vector (pWT-PDHX) is the 3′-UTR region of PDHX gene including miR-26a binding site. The mutant vector (pMT-PDHX) was obtained by mutating a few bases of the binding site.
Hela cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Each well was seeded with 1 × 104 cells in 96-well plates. When cell confluence reached 70%, the pWT-PDHX and pMT-PDHX, were co-transfected with miR-26a mimic and mimic NC (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China), respectively, by using FuGENE HD Transfection Reagent (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. After 48 h, cell lysates were prepared and relative dual-luciferase activity was detected by a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).

2.5. Sperm Liquid Storage, Cryopreservation, and Electrotransfection

Initially, an isothermal and equal-volume Beltsville thawing solution (BTS: 3.7 g glucose, 0.3 g trisodium citrate, 0.125 g Na2-EDTA, 0.125 g NaHCO3, 0.075 g KCl, 0.6 g/L penicillin G sodium, and 1.0 g/L dihydrostreptomycin; all diluted to 100 mL) was added to the fresh boar semen. Following gentle mixing, it was wrapped in a towel, kept at room temperature for 30 min, and finally stored in a refrigerator at 17 °C. Ejaculated boar sperm were cryopreserved according to our laboratory’s protocol [55]. Briefly, sperm were diluted (1:1 v/v) with BTS and cooled slowly to 17 °C. The diluted sperm were centrifuged at 239 g for 6 min. Then, the supernatant was discarded, and sperm pellets were suspended in lactose-egg yolk extender (LEY: 11g β-lactose and 20 mL hen’s egg yolk were added to 80 mL ddH2O), and cooled down slowly to 4 °C in 4 h. Subsequently, the same volume of second extender (lactose-egg yolk supplemented with glycerol and the concentration of glycerol (6%) was added to above mixture for getting a final concentration of 3% glycerol. The completely miscible liquids were packed into 0.25 mL straws (FHK, Tokyo, Japan) and equilibrated at approximately −150 °C above liquid nitrogen (LN) vapor for 15 min, then the straws were placed into LN (−196 °C) for long-term storage.
Electrotransfection was performed according to Zhang’s electrotransfection method [56]. Ejaculated boar sperm were diluted to a concentration of 5 × 107 mL−1 using BTS. Transfection was conducted using a Cell Manipulation ECM-2001 (BTX, Holliston, MA, USA) with 25 nM of miRNA mimic and inhibitor or a scrambled negative control (NC) (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and pulse conditions were adjusted as 4 × 300 V for 100 μs. The sperm were cultured under the same condition after transfection. The efficiency of transfection was detected at 6 h, and then sperm viability, relative expression of miR-26a, and PDHX were assessed every 24 h until 96 h. WB was performed at 24 h and 48 h after transfection.

2.6. Sperm Viability Detection

Sperm viability was determined by trypan blue staining after electro-transfection. Briefly, 20 µL semen and an equal volume of 0.8% trypan blue were uniformly mixed. After incubation for 5 min at 37 °C, at least 200 live sperms were counted according to manufacturer’s instruction (live sperms were unstained and dead ones were stained). All procedures were repeated for three times.

2.7. Total RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis and RT-qPCR

Total RNA from boar sperm was extracted with Trizol LS Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to our laboratory’s protocol. The somatic cells in all sperm samples were removed according to the procedures described by Bianchi et al. [57] with some modifications. Briefly, boar sperms were incubated with 0.1% SDS and 0.5% Triton X-100 (Coolaber, Beijing, China) on ice for 15 min. The concentration and quality of total RNA were measured with a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Reverse transcription of total RNA and miRNA was performed by using TaKaRa PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China) and Takara SYBR PrimeScript miRNA RT-PCR Reagent Kit (Takara Biotech, Dalian, China), respectively according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All reverse transcription products were preserved at −20 °C.
RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Reagent Kit (Takara Biotech, China) on the CFX 96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Briefly, RT-qPCR was carried out using 5 µL SYBR Green I Premix, 0.5 µL each of forward and reverse primers, and 1 µL of cDNA, with the addition of RNase-free water to make a total volume of 10 µL. Thermal cycling was performed as follows: an initial step of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 5 s, and the primer specific annealing temperatures were implied for 30 s. Relative expression levels were determined using 2−∆∆CT method [58].

2.8. Western Blot Analysis

Western blot (WB) analyses was performed as described previously [59] with some modifications. Briefly, total protein was extracted from sperm in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. The protein was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Non-specific binding sites of protein were blocked by incubation in Tris-Buffered Saline Tween-20 (TBST) containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20 and 5% (w/v) Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The membranes were immunoblotted with anti-PDHX and anti-β-tubulin (ZEN BIO, Chengdu, China) and diluted in TBST with 5% BSA (β-tubulin 1:10,000 and PDHX 1:500 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. Followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG (ZEN BIO, Chengdu, China) for PDHX and β-tubulin, 1:10,000 dilution. After washing in TBST, enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection was performed by using Immun-Star™ WesternC™ Chemiluminescence Kit (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The exposure and development of PVDF membrane were performed using ChemiScope 6000 Exp (CLiNX, Shanghai, China), and band intensities were analyzed using a Gel-Pro Analyzer (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were tested for normality and variance homogeneity prior to statistical analysis. The relative gene expressions and protein levels were analyzed by Student t-test and sperm viability was analyzed by ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-hoc test. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05 and the results are shown as mean ± SEM.

3. Results

3.1. PDHX is Direct Target Gene of miR-26a

The prediction results showed that PDHX 3′-UTR harbors only one potential target site for miRNA-26a based on TargetScan, miRWalk, miRanda, and picTar. The sequence of the target site was highly conserved in Homo sapiens (Hsa), Pan troglodytes (Ptr), Sus scrofa (Ssc), Bos taurus (Bst), and Mus musculus (Mmu) (Figure 1A)
The dual luciferase recombinant, wild type and mutant type plasmid sequences of PDHX 3’-UTR are shown in Figure 1B. Recombinant plasmid with WT and MT PDHX 3’-UTR were co-transfected with miR-26a mimic and mimic NC, respectively into Hela cells. Based on dual-luciferase reporter assay, miR-26a significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the relative luciferase ratio in pWT group as compared to the mimic NC group, while no noticeable difference (P > 0.05) was found in pMT group (Figure 1C).
To further determine the transfection efficiency and relationship between PDHX and miR-26a, mimic NC with Cy-3 fluorophore was transfected into boar sperm for 6 h. The transfection efficiency was about 70%, which was calculated by counting the proportion of sperm with red fluorescence signals (Figure 2A,B). The expression of miR-26a in boar sperm transfected with miR-26a mimic was significantly elevated (P < 0.01) as compared to mimic NC group, and the expression in inhibitor group was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the inhibitor NC group (Figure 2C). Besides this, the expression of PDHX was decreased when miR-26a was overexpressed (Figure 2D). Therefore, these findings provide reasonable evidence that PDHX is a direct target gene of miR-26a and indicate that miR-26a may have potential implication in inhibiting the expression of PDHX at the mRNA level.

3.2. Expression of miR-26a and PDHX in Epididymal Sperm

We first detected the expression of two energy metabolism-related genes i.e., PGAM1 and SMCP in boar epididymal sperm. The RT-qPCR results showed a significant difference (P < 0.01) in the expression level of PGAM1 and SMCP in sperm retrieved from different epididymal segments (caput, corpus and cauda). Next, we determined the relative expression of PDHX in epididymal caput, corpus and cauda sperm which showed similar results to that of PGAM1 and SMCP (Figure 3). However, the expression level of miR-26a in the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda did not correspond exactly to the trend shown in the expression of PDHX. Moreover, miR-26a showed the highest expression in epididymal corpus sperm and it was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the caput and cauda sperm, indicating that sperm motility might gradually increase when sperm transit in epididymis from the caput to cauda.

3.3. Comparison of miR-26a and PDHX Expression in Epididymal cauda, Ejaculated and Frozen-Thawed Boar Sperm

Our RT-qPCR analysis showed that PDHX was abundantly (P < 0.01) expressed in ejaculated sperm, and no significant difference (P > 0.05) in expression was observed between epididymal cauda and frozen-thawed sperm (Figure 4A). Moreover, the expression level of miR-26a in epididymal cauda sperm was significantly higher (P < 0.01) as compared to ejaculated and frozen-thawed sperm (Figure 4B).

3.4. Effects of miR-26a Transfection on PDHX Expression and Boar Sperm Viability Under Liquid Preservation Conditions

During liquid preservation of boar sperm, we have observed that the expression level of miR-26a was first increased and then decreased. Intriguingly, the expression level of miR-26a was significantly increased when sperm were transfected with miR-26a mimic and decreased following miR-26a inhibitor transfection. Conversely, the expression of PDHX with miR-26a mimic treatment was significantly decreased; however, it increased following miR-26a inhibitor transfection (Figure 5A).
Sperm viability was evaluated at 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h by using 0.4% Trypan Blue staining as described earlier. The results showed that sperm viability has gradually decreased with increasing storage time. Of note, sperm viability was around 80% at 24 h, and each treatment showed no significant difference when compared to the control group. However, 48 h later, sperm viability in miR-26a mimic transfected treatments were significantly lower (P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Conversely, sperm viability in miR-26a inhibitor transfected treatments were significantly higher (P < 0.05) as compared to control group. Moreover, sperm viability was decreased to about 60% at 96 h (Figure 5B).
Further, WB analysis indicated that the protein level of PDHX was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased and increased after 24 h and 48 h transfection with miR-26a mimics and inhibitor, respectively, as compared to NC group (Figure 5C,D).

4. Discussion

Although previously it has been shown that miR-26a could affect glucose metabolism in cancer cells by targeted-regulation of expression of PDHX mRNA and protein [60]. So far, there was no report on the regulatory relationship between miR-26a and PDHX which can affect sperm glycometabolism and thus the survival of boar sperm. Our current study provides a novel evidence that miR-26a is directly linked with PDHX in boar sperm and might regulate the energy metabolism and affect sperm viability. We observed that the expressions of miR-26a and PDHX exhibit significant differences among epididymal (caput, corpus and cauda), ejaculated and frozen-thawed sperm. Moreover, previous studies have also demonstrated the differential metabolism and viability percentage in epididymal, ejaculated and frozen-thawed sperm [61,62]. Following transfection with miR-26a mimic, the mRNA expression level of PDHX was significantly down-regulated, and a decreased sperm viability was also observed in our study. Meanwhile, the protein levels of PDHX transfected with miR-26a mimic and inhibitor after 24 h and 48 h were also significantly changed. It was reported that, under the condition of low current, electrotransfection has no significant impact on viability, plasma membrane, acrosomal and DNA integrity of boar sperm [63]. Furthermore, the ram sperm viability remained about 80% after electrotransfection [56]. In present study, no significant variation of mRNA and protein level of PDHX were found before and after electrotransfection without miR-26a mimic and inhibitor. Reversely, when sperms were electrotransfected with miR-26a mimic and inhibitor and evaluated after 24 h and 48 h, significant changes of mRNA and protein levels of PDHX were observed. This suggested that electrotransfection was an effective method and have no impact on the expression of PDHX. Our findings provide a reasonable molecular evidence and reveal a potential link between miR-26a/PDHX and sperm viability.
PGAM1 (phosphoglycerate mutase 1) and SMCP (sperm mitochondria associated cysteine rich protein) are two important energy metabolism-related proteins of sperm. PGAM1 catalyzes the conversion between 3-phosphoglyceric acid and 2-phosphoglyceric acid which regulates the glycolytic pathway and is also involved in multiple cancer processes [64,65]. Moreover, SMCP is a specific protein of male germ cells, located in the outer membrane of sperm mitochondria [66]. Knockout of SMCP could lead to decreased sperm motility and male infertility [67]. In present study, the expression levels of sperm SMCP and PGAM1 were gradually increased during sperm transition in the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda. Similar results were found for PDHX expression in the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda sperm. Thus, our results are coherent with the fact that sperm motility and metabolism gradually increase during sperm transit in epididymis. However, it is still incompletely understood that which metabolic pathway is used by boar sperm for producing ATP which is required for maintaining its movement and longevity. It is generally believed that balance of sperm metabolic pathways is controlled by external factors such as environmental substrate composition and oxygen levels, suggesting that metabolic events in sperm may be affected by changes in environmental conditions [68]. It has been suggested that both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation are necessary for maintenance of normal sperm function and fertilizing ability; however, these two pathways can act in tandem as well [69]. In some animal species, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is considered as an essential pathway for sperm energy metabolism [28,29]. Similarly, in our study, we also envisaged that increased expression of PDHX may be linked with corresponding increase in the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation level in boar sperm.
Surprisingly, the expression levels of miR-26a in epididymal caput, corpus and cauda sperm were not well consistent with the increasing expression level of its target gene i.e., PDHX. Therefore, keeping these differences in mind, we envisage that there may be other putative regulatory factors which might be implicated in modulating miR-26a/PDHX interaction. Recent studies have reported that epididymal exosomes, also called epididymosomes, a kind of vesicles contained complex protein component and RNAs which are secreted by epididymal epithelial cells and could transfer RNAs, miRNAs, small molecules and exosome-associated proteins through the plasma membrane of immature sperm, and are involved in regulating sperm motility and maturation process [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. In mouse model, it has been demonstrated that expression profile of sperm RNAs could change during maturation of epididymal sperm and this change was caused by epididymosomes [78,79]. The similar exosomes have also been identified in other species such as amphibians [80]. However, protein composition of epididymosomes could vary in epididymal caput, corpus and cauda. Proteomic analysis of the epididymosomes has revealed that most of these proteins could play a crucial role in transfer and metabolism of exosome component. In addition, some new proteins of epididymosomes which are associated with sperm fertilization have also been identified [81]. Moreover, exosomes are also present in seminal plasma which interact with sperm and have been implicated in regulating the changes in miRNAs [82]. It has been demonstrated that there are some prostasomes (a kind of exosome in seminal plasma) which can specifically deliver the genetic and bioactive materials to sperm, and subsequently can improve the quality of semen and the rate of fertilization in boar [83,84,85]. It is possible that expression pattern of miR-26a and PDHX might be effected by epididymosomes and confounding bio-factors during transit of sperm in epididymis. Therefore, further functional focused and mechanistic studies have the real potential to elucidate these mechanisms and improve our understanding in this regard.
In addition to exosomes, methylation level of miRNA itself or its promoter region is also important factor which is implicated in affecting miRNA expression. It was also reported that CpG Island of miRNA gene promoter exhibits a methylation modification, resultantly blocking the transcription of miRNA [86]. Moreover, following downregulation of expression of an RNA demethylase FTO, the expression levels of several miRNAs were affected. These observations were further confirmed by the presence of a N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a type of RNA methylation in miRNA [87]. Besides these, other similar studies have also demonstrated that the regulation of expression of 5-methylcytosine (m5C) or m6A methylation-related genes could affect processing of pre-miRNAs [88,89]. The presence of m6A modification in pri-miRNAs may be an important signaling marker for the processing of pri-miRNAs into the mature miRNAs, which is involved in the regulation of miRNAs biogenesis [90]. Although specific DNA promoter sequences of sperm are methylated in different segments of epididymis of mouse (initial segment, caput, corpus and cauda), however, these promoter methylation modifications were found to have no significant effect on gene transcription [91]. Nevertheless, questions such as: whether regionally specific methylation modifications exist in the boar epididymis or not, and these modifications further interact with exosomes or not, to influence the methylated modification pattern of genome or RNAs of boar sperm during sperm transit in the epididymis. Another ambiguity is that whether these modifications are implicated or not in affecting the expression level of miR-26a and PDHX. To answer these questions further in-depth functional and mechanistic studies are required.

5. Conclusions

Our study is the first to report that miR-26a by targeting PDHX, a link between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, might regulate the glycometabolic pathway and eventually affect the boar sperm viability and survival. Additionally, our results also provide reasonable evidence that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation might be an essential and indispensable metabolic pathway for maintenance of boar sperm motility and survival. However, further functional and mechanistic studies are still required for in-depth understanding of such molecular pathways which are implicated in energy metabolism in boar sperm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Z.; Data curation, W.W., K.L., M.A.A., and Y.C.; Funding acquisition, C.Z.; Investigation, C.Z.; Methodology, M.R., D.D. and Y.Z.; Project administration, C.Z.; Resources, K.L.; Software, W.W.; Supervision, C.Z.; Validation, W.W., M.R. and K.L.; Writing—original draft, W.W. and K.L.; Writing—review & editing, M.A.A., I.H.Q., Y.Z., M.Z., G.Z., C.A., J.Y. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 30901028, NO.31570533 and NO.31872356).

Acknowledgments

We offer special thanks to Chongzhou pig farm of the Sichuan Giastar Group for semen collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dacheux, J.L.; Dacheux, F. New insights into epididymal function in relation to sperm maturation. Reproduction 2013, 147, R27–R42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cornwall, G.A. New insights into epididymal biology and function. Hum. Reprod. Update 2008, 15, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zakošek Pipan, M.; Mrkun, J.; Nemec Svete, A.; Zrimšek, P. Improvement of liquid stored boar semen quality by removing low molecular weight proteins and supplementation with α-tocopherol. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 186, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Trzcińska, M.; Bryła, M.; Smorąg, Z. Apoptotic-like changes in the spermatozoa of fresh and stored boar semen and the quality of embryos produced in vivo. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 124, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eriksson, B.M.; Vazquez, J.M.; Martinez, E.A.; Roca, J.; Lucas, X.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Effects of holding time during cooling and of type of package on plasma membrane integrity, motility and in vitro oocyte penetration ability of frozen-thawed boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2001, 55, 1593–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Guthrie, H.D.; Welch, G.R. Impact of storage prior to cryopreservation on plasma membrane function and fertility of boar sperm. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 396–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Akyol, N.; Varışlı, Ö.; Kızıl, S.H. Effects of long-term storage on some spermatological parameters in cryopreserved bull semen. Cryoletters 2018, 39, 354–358. [Google Scholar]
  8. O’Dell, W.T.; Almquist, J.O. Freezing bovine semen. IV. Effect of freezing on the metabolic activity of bovine spermatozoa during and after storage at −79 °C. J. Dairy Sci. 1958, 41, 1792–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Bonet, S. Current knowledge on boar sperm metabolism: Comparison with other mammalian species. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galantino-Homer, H.L.; Florman, H.M.; Storey, B.T.; Dobrinski, I.; Kopf, G.S. Bovine sperm capacitation: Assessment of phosphodiesterase activity and intracellular alkalinization on capacitation-associated protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2004, 67, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jones, A.R.; Connor, D.E. Fructose metabolism by mature boar spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2000, 12, 355–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rigau, T.; Rivera, M.; Palomo, M.J.; Fernández-Novell, J.M.; Moqas, T.; Ballester, J.; Peňa, A.; Otaegui, P.J.; Guinovart, J.J.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. Differential effects of glucose and fructose on hexose metabolism in dog spermatozoa. Reproduction 2002, 123, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, K.; Zhang, J.Z.; Xu, Z.; Xu, Y.; Xu, A.; Chen, W.; Miao, C.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Jia, R. Metabolomic profiling of human spermatozoa in idiopathic asthenozoospermia patients using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8327506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Peterson, R.N.; Freund, M. Factors affecting fructose utilization and lactic acid formation by human semen. The role of glucose and pyruvic acid. Fertil. Steril. 1971, 22, 639–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jones, A.R.; Connor, D.E. Control of glycolysis in mature boar spermatozoa: Effect of pH in vitro. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2004, 16, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Crocker, J. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease CD-ROM. Mol. Pathol. 1997, 50, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  17. Bricker, D.K.; Taylor, E.B.; Schell, J.C.; Orsak, T.; Boutron, A.; Chen, Y.C.; Cox, J.E.; Cardon, C.M.; Van Vranken, J.G.; Dephoure, N.; et al. A mitochondrial pyruvate carrier required for pyruvate uptake in yeast, Drosophila, and humans. Science 2012, 337, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aral, B.; Benelli, C.; Ait-Ghezala, G.; Amessou, M.; Fougue, F.; Maunoury, C.; Créau, N.; Kamoun, P.; Marsac, C. Mutations in PDX1, the human lipoyl-containing component X of the pyruvate dehydrogenase–complex gene on chromosome 11p1, in congenital lactic acidosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61, 1318–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ling, M. Detection of a homozygous four base pair deletion in the protein X gene in a case of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1998, 7, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miné, M.; Brivet, M.; Schiff, M.; de Baulny, H.O.; Chuzhanova, N.; Marsac, C. A novel gross deletion caused by non-homologous recombination of the PDHX gene in a patient with pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2006, 89, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
  21. Patel, M.S.; Roche, T.E. Molecular biology and biochemistry of pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 3224–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Brown, G.K.; Otero, L.J.; LeGris, M.; Brown, R.M. Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency. J. Med. Genet. 1994, 31, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Robinson, B.H.; Mackay, N.; Petrovabenedict, R.; Ozalp, I.; Coskun, T.; Stacpoole, P.W. Defects in the E2 lipoyl transacetylase and the X-lipoyl containing component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in patients with lactic acidemia. J. Clin. Investig. 1990, 85, 1821–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dey, R.; Aral, B.; Abitbol, M.; Marsac, C. Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency as a result of splice-site mutation in the PDX1 gene. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2002, 76, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brown, R.M.; Head, R.A.; Morris, A.A.; Raiman, J.A.; Walter, J.H.; Whitehouse, W.P.; Brown, G.K. Pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 binding protein (protein X) deficiency. Dev. Med. Child. Neurol. 2006, 48, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dey, R.; Mine, M.; Desguerre, I.; Slama, A.; Van Den Berghe, L.; Brivet, M.; Aral, B.; Marsac, C. A new case of pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency due to a novel mutation in the PDX1 gene. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 53, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Eastlack, S.C.; Dong, S.; Ivan, C.; Alahari, S.K. Suppression of PDHX by microRNA-27b deregulates cell metabolism and promotes growth in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rikmenspoel, R. The inhibition by amytal of respiration and motility of bull spermatozoa. Exp. Cell Res. 1965, 37, 312–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Windsor, D.P. Mitochondrial function and ram sperm fertility. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 1997, 9, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Frenkel, G.; Peterson, R.N.; Freund, M. Oxidative and glycolytic metabolism of semen components by washed guinea pig spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 1975, 26, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nascimento, J.M.; Shi, L.Z.; Tam, J.; Chandsawangbhuwana, C.; Durrant, B.; Botvinick, E.L.; Berns, M.W. Comparison of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation as energy sources for mammalian sperm motility, using the combination of fluorescence imaging, laser tweezers, and real-time automated tracking and trapping. J. Cell Physiol. 2008, 217, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tourmente, M.; Villar-Moya, P.; Rial, E.; Roldan, E.R. Differences in ATP generation via glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation and relationships with sperm motility in mouse species. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 20613–20626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Marin, S.; Chiang, K.; Bassilian, S.; Lee, W.N.; Boros, L.G.; Fernández-Novell, J.M.; Centelles, J.J.; Medrano, A.; Rodriguez-Gil, J.E.; Cascante, M. Metabolic strategy of boar spermatozoa revealed by a metabolomic characterization. FEBS Lett. 2003, 554, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nevo, A.C.; Polge, C.; Frederick, G. Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism of Boar spermatozoa in Relation to Their Motility. Reproduction 1970, 22, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Erin, C.; Safranski, T.J.; Pratt, S.L. Differential expression of porcine sperm microRNAs and their association with sperm morphology and motility. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 1532–1539. [Google Scholar]
  36. Said, T.M.; Gaglani, A.; Agarwal, A. Implication of apoptosis in sperm cryoinjury. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2010, 21, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aitken, R.J.; Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J.; Kerr, J.B. Apoptosis in the germ line. Reproduction 2011, 141, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grunewald, S.; Paasch, U.; Said, T.M.; Sharma, R.K.; Agarwal, A.; Glander, H.J. Modulation of mitochondrial mediated apoptosis in ejaculated human spermatozoa and its impact on sperm motility. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 82, S285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, D.H.; Yuan, D.; Zhang, L.Y.; Qiao, P.; Liang, X.; Chang, B. Increase of apoptosis and decrease of sperm motility induced by oxidative stress after exposed to butyl p-hydroxybenzoate. J. Hyg. Res. 2017, 46, 196–200. [Google Scholar]
  40. Perdichizzi, A.; Nicoletti, F.; La Vignera, S.; Barone, N.; D’Agata, R.; Vicari, E.; Calogero, A.E. Effects of Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha on human sperm motility and apoptosis. J. Clin. Immunol. 2007, 27, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, J.D.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, J.W. Testosterone-dependent miR-26a-5p and let-7g-5p act as signaling mediators to regulate sperm apoptosis via targeting PTEN and PMAIP1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chang, Y.; Dai, D.H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, G.B.; Zeng, C.J. Differences in the expression of microRNAs and their predicted gene targets between cauda epididymal and ejaculated boar sperm. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 2162–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhou, R.; Zhang, Y.; Du, G.; Han, L.; Zheng, S.; Liang, J.; Huang, X.; Qin, Y.; Wu, W.; Chen, M.; et al. Down-regulated let-7b-5p represses glycolysis metabolism by targeting AURKB in asthenozoospermia. Gene 2018, 663, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Castro, F.O.; Sharbati, S.; Rodríguez-Alvarez, L.L.; Cox, J.F.; Hultschig, C.; Einspanier, R. MicroRNA expression profiling of elongated cloned and in vitro–fertilized bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dey, B.K.; Gagan, J.; Yan, Z.; Dutta, A. miR-26a is required for skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration in mice. Gene Dev. 2012, 26, 2180–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Huang, J.M.; Ju, Z.H.; Li, Q.L.; Hou, Q.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Li, R.; Wang, L.; Sun, T.; Hang, S.; et al. Solexa sequencing of novel and differentially expressed microRNAs in testicular and ovarian tissues in Holstein cattle. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 7, 1016–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Huang, J.M.; Guo, F.; Zhang, Z.B.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Ju, Z.; Yang, C.; Wang, C.; Hou, M.; Zhong, J. PCK1 is negatively regulated by bta-miR-26a, and a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the 3′ untranslated region is involved in semen quality and longevity of holstein bulls. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2016, 83, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bissonnette, N.; Lévesque-Sergerie, J.P.; Thibault, C.; Boissonneault, G. Spermatozoal transcriptome profiling for bull sperm motility: A potential tool to evaluate semen quality. Reproduction 2009, 138, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Capra, E.; Turri, F.; Lazzari, B.; Cremonesi, P.; Gliozzi, T.M.; Fojadelli, I.; Stella, A.; Pizzi, F. Small RNA sequencing of cryopreserved semen from single bull revealed altered miRNAs and piRNAs expression between High- and Low-motile sperm populations. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saenz, J.R.; Guerrero, C.A.; Paccamonti, D.; Eilts, B.E.; Bondioli, K.R.; Godke, R.A. Processing of postmortem bovine epididymal sperm after cooling the testes for 24 hours. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2008, 20, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lewis, B.P.; Shih, I.H.; Jones-Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, D.P.; Burge, C.B. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 2003, 115, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. John, B.; Enright, A.J.; Aravin, A.; Tuschl, T.; Sander, C.; Marks, D.S. Human microRNA targets. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3, e264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, S.M.; Zeng, S.M.; Zhou, Z.W.; He, Z.X.; Zhou, S.F. Hsa-microRNA-181a is a regulator of a number of cancer genes and a biomarker for endometrial carcinoma in patients: A bioinformatic and clinical study and the therapeutic implication. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 1103–1175. [Google Scholar]
  54. Krek, A.; Grün, D.; Poy, M.N.; Wolf, R.; Rosenberg, L.; Epstein, E.J.; MacMenamin, P.; da Piedade, I.; Gunsalus, K.C.; Stoffel, M.; et al. Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zeng, C.J.; Tang, K.Y.; He, L.; Peng, W.P.; Ding, L.; Fang, D.H.; Zhang, Y. Effects of glycerol on apoptotic signaling pathways during boar spermatozoa cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2014, 68, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, Z.; Zhou, X.; Li, H.X.; Cui, Q.W.; Yu, J.; Wang, G.L. Delivery of catSper2 siRNA into rat sperms by electroporation repressed Ca2+ influx during sperm hyperactivation. Agric. Sci. China 2011, 10, 1958–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bianchi, E.; Stermer, A.; Boekelheide, K.; Sigman, M.; Hall, S.J.; Reyes, G.; Dere, E.; Hwang, K. High-quality human and rat spermatozoal RNA isolation for functional genomic studies. Andrology 2018, 6, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 −ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhu, Z.; Umehara, T.; Okazaki, T.; Goto, M.; Fujita, Y.; Hogue, S.A.M.; Kawai, T.; Zeng, W.; Shimada, M. Gene Expression and protein synthesis in mitochondria enhance the duration of high-speed linear motility in boar sperm. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, B.; Liu, Y.L.; Jin, X.W.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.; Xia, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Zhao, X.; Xu, N.; Liang, S. MicroRNA-26a regulates glucose metabolism by direct targeting PDHX in colorectal cancer cells. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yeung, C.H.; Cooper, T.G. Developmental changes in signalling transduction factors in maturing sperm during epididymal transit. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2003, 49, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Di Santo, M.; Tarozzi, N.; Nadalini, M.; Borini, A. Human sperm cryopreservation: update on techniques, effect on DNA integrity, and implications for ART. Adv. Neurol. 2012, 2012, 854837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. da Silva, Z.; de Souza, A.P.; Pandolfi, J.R.C.; da Fonseca, F.N.; da Veiga Lima-Rosa, C.A.; Margues, M.G. Comparison between electroporation and polyfection in pig sperm: Efficiency and cell viability implications. Zygote 2018, 26, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, L.J.; Chen, S.X.; Luo, W.J.; Jiang, H.H.; Zhang, P.F.; Yi, H. Proteomic analysis of secreted proteins of non-small cell lung cancer. Chin. J. Cancer 2006, 25, 1361–1367. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hitosugi, T.; Zhou, L.; Elf, S.; Fan, J.; Kang, H.B.; Seo, J.H.; Shan, C.; Dai, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xie, J.; et al. Phosphoglycerate mutase 1 coordinates glycolysis and biosynthesis to promote tumor growth. Cancer Cell 2012, 22, 585–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Maiorino, M.; Roveri, A.; Benazzi, L.; Bosello, V.; Mauri, P.; Toppo, S.; Tosatto, S.C.; Ursini, F. Functional interaction of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase with sperm mitochondrion-associated cysteine-rich protein discloses the adjacent cysteine motif as a new substrate of the selenoperoxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 38395–38402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Nayernia, K.; Adham, I.M.; Burkhardt-Göttges, E.; Neesen, J.; Rieche, M.; Wolf, S.; Sancken, U.; Kleene, K.; Engel, W. Asthenozoospermia in mice with targeted deletion of the sperm mitochondrion-associated cysteine-rich protein (Smcp) Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 3046–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Qiu, J.H.; Li, Y.W.; Xie, H.L.; Li, Q.; Dong, H.B.; Sun, M.J.; Gao, W.Q.; Tan, J.H. Effects of glucose metabolism pathways on sperm motility and oxidative status during long-term liquid storage of goat semen. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. du Plessis, S.; Agarwal, A.; Mohanty, G.; van der Linde, M. Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: What fuel do spermatozoa use? Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 230–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gatti, J.L.; Métayer, S.; Belghazi, M.; Dacheux, F.; Dacheux, J.L. Identification, proteomic profiling, and origin of ram epididymal fluid exosome-like vesicles. Biol. Reprod. 2005, 72, 1452–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. da Silveira, J.C.; de Ávila, A.C.F.C.M.; Garrett, H.; Bruemmer, J.E.; Winger, Q.A.; Bouma, G.J. Cell-secreted vesicles containing microRNAs as regulators of gamete maturation. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 236, R15–R27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Barkalina, N.; Jones, C.; Wood, M.J.; Coward, K. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of molecular compounds into gametes and embryos: Learning from nature. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Belleannée, C. Extracellular microRNAs from the epididymis as potential mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sullivan, R.; Saez, F.; Girouard, J.; Frenette, G. Role of exosomes in sperm maturation during the transit along the male reproductive tract. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 2005, 35, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sharma, U.; Conine, C.C.; Shea, J.M.; Boskovic, A.; Derr, A.G.; Bing, X.Y.; Belleannee, C.; Kucukural, A.; Serra, R.W.; Sun, F.; et al. Biogenesis and function of tRNA fragments during sperm maturation and fertilization in mammals. Science 2016, 351, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sullivan, R.; Frenette, G.; Girouard, J. Epididymosomes are involved in the acquisition of new sperm proteins during epididymal transit. Asian J. Androl. 2007, 9, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gervasi, M.G.; Visconti, P.E. Molecular changes and signaling events occurring in sperm during epididymal maturation. Andrology 2017, 5, 204–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nixon, B.; Stanger, S.J.; Mihalas, B.P.; Reilly, J.N.; Anderson, A.L.; Tyagi, S.; Holt, J.E.; McLaughlin, E.A. The microRNA signature of mouse spermatozoa is substantially modified during epididymal maturation. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 93, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Reilly, J.N.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Stanger, S.J.; Anderson, A.L.; Hutcheon, K.; Church, K.; Mihalas, B.P.; Tyagi, S.; Holt, J.E.; Eamens, A.L.; et al. Characterisation of mouse epididymosomes reveals a complex profile of microRNAs and a potential mechanism for modification of the sperm epigenome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chen, H.; Yang, P.; Chu, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Q.; Hu, L.; Wagas, Y.; Ahmed, N.; et al. Cellular evidence for nano-scale exosome secretion and interactions with spermatozoa in the epididymis of the Chinese soft-shelled turtle, Pelodiscus sinensis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 19242–19250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nixon, B.; De Iuliis, G.N.; Hart, H.M.; Zhou, W.; Mathe, A.; Bernstein, I.R.; Anderson, A.L.; Stanger, S.J.; Skerrett-Byrne, D.A.; Jamaluddin, M.F.B.; et al. Proteomic profiling of mouse epididymosomes reveals their contributions to post-testicular sperm maturation. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2019, 18, S91–S108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Saez, F.; Frenette, G.; Sullivan, R. Epididymosomes and prostasomes: Their roles in post-testicular maturation of the sperm cells. J. Androl. 2003, 24, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ronquist, G. Prostasomes are mediators of intercellular communication: From basic research to clinical implications. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 271, 400–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Arienti, G. The motility of human spermatozoa as influenced by prostasomes at various ph levels. Biol. Cell 1999, 91, 51–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fabiani, R.; Johansson, L.; Lundkvist, O.; Ronguist, G. Enhanced recruitment of motile spermatozoa by prostasome inclusion in swim-up medium. Hum. Reprod. 1994, 9, 1485–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chhabra, R. miRNA and Methylation: A multifaceted liaison. Chembiochem 2015, 16, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Berulava, T.; Rahmann, S.; Rademacher, K.; Klein-Hitpass, L.; Horsthemke, B. N6-Adenosine Methylation in miRNAs. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yuan, S.; Tang, H.; Xing, J.; Fan, X.; Cai, X.; Li, Q.; Han, P.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, B.; et al. Methylation by NSun2 represses the levels and function of microRNA 125b. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 3630–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ma, J.Z.; Yang, F.; Zhou, C.C.; Liu, F.; Yuan, J.H.; Wang, F.; Wang, T.T.; Xu, Q.G.; Zhou, W.P.; Sun, S.H. METTL14 suppresses the metastatic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating N6-methyladenosine-dependent primary microRNA processing. Hepatology 2017, 65, 529–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alarcón, C.R.; Lee, H.; Goodarzi, H.; Halberg, N.; Tavazoie, S.F. N6-methyladenosine marks primary microRNAs for processing. Nature 2015, 519, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chu, C.; Zheng, G.Y.; Hu, S.G.; Zhang, J.; Xie, S.; Ma, W.; Ni, M.; Tang, C.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Epididymal region-specific miRNA expression and DNA methylation and their roles in controlling gene expression in rats. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 09 00146 g001
Figure 1. Target gene prediction of miR-26a and dual-luciferase reporter assay. (A) The predicted binding sites between pyruvate dehydrogenase complex component X (PDHX) 3’-UTR and miR-26a in various species. (B) The structure of recombinant plasmid and the binding site of wild type (WT) (red colored) and mutant type (MT) (blue colored) between PDHX 3’-UTR and miR-26a. Firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase were regarded as the report gene and reference gene, respectively. (C) The result of dual-luciferase reporter assay. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05.
Figure 1. Target gene prediction of miR-26a and dual-luciferase reporter assay. (A) The predicted binding sites between pyruvate dehydrogenase complex component X (PDHX) 3’-UTR and miR-26a in various species. (B) The structure of recombinant plasmid and the binding site of wild type (WT) (red colored) and mutant type (MT) (blue colored) between PDHX 3’-UTR and miR-26a. Firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase were regarded as the report gene and reference gene, respectively. (C) The result of dual-luciferase reporter assay. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05.
Cells 09 00146 g001
Cells 09 00146 g002
Figure 2. The transfection efficiency and expression level of miR-26a and PDHX. (A,B) Sperm transfected with mimic negative control (NC) with Cy3 fluorophore under white light conditions and fluorescence conditions, 200×. (C,D) The expression of miR-26a and PDHX after transfection of 6 h, respectively. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05 and “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Figure 2. The transfection efficiency and expression level of miR-26a and PDHX. (A,B) Sperm transfected with mimic negative control (NC) with Cy3 fluorophore under white light conditions and fluorescence conditions, 200×. (C,D) The expression of miR-26a and PDHX after transfection of 6 h, respectively. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05 and “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Cells 09 00146 g002
Cells 09 00146 g003
Figure 3. The expression levels of PGAM1, SMCP (left) and miR-26a, PDHX (right) in the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda sperm. “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Figure 3. The expression levels of PGAM1, SMCP (left) and miR-26a, PDHX (right) in the epididymal caput, corpus and cauda sperm. “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Cells 09 00146 g003
Cells 09 00146 g004
Figure 4. The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX in the epididymal cauda, ejaculated sperm and frozen-thawed sperm. (A) PDHX. (B) miR-26a. “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Figure 4. The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX in the epididymal cauda, ejaculated sperm and frozen-thawed sperm. (A) PDHX. (B) miR-26a. “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01.
Cells 09 00146 g004
Cells 09 00146 g005
Figure 5. The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX, and sperm viability in miR-26a transfected boar sperm at 17 °C. (A) Sperm viability after miR-26a transfection. (B) The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX after transfection with miR-26a mimic, mimic control, miR-26a inhibitor and inhibitor control for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h, respectively. (C) WB analysis after 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h treatment with miR-26a mimic/mimic NC and inhibitor/inhibitor NC showing the expression of PDHX and β-tubulin. The negative control rabbit IgG in place of the primary antibody was used. (D) The relative protein level of PDHX after transfection with miR-26a mimic and inhibitor. Values were normalized using β-tubulin protein as an internal reference, and then mimic NC and inhibitor NC groups were used as references to measure the relative expression levels. mi: mimic; mi nc: mimic NC; in: inhibitor; in nc: inhibitor NC. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05 and “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01. Different alphabets indicate statistical significance at P < 0.05.
Figure 5. The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX, and sperm viability in miR-26a transfected boar sperm at 17 °C. (A) Sperm viability after miR-26a transfection. (B) The expression level of miR-26a and PDHX after transfection with miR-26a mimic, mimic control, miR-26a inhibitor and inhibitor control for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 96 h, respectively. (C) WB analysis after 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h treatment with miR-26a mimic/mimic NC and inhibitor/inhibitor NC showing the expression of PDHX and β-tubulin. The negative control rabbit IgG in place of the primary antibody was used. (D) The relative protein level of PDHX after transfection with miR-26a mimic and inhibitor. Values were normalized using β-tubulin protein as an internal reference, and then mimic NC and inhibitor NC groups were used as references to measure the relative expression levels. mi: mimic; mi nc: mimic NC; in: inhibitor; in nc: inhibitor NC. “*” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.05 and “**” indicates statistical significance at P < 0.01. Different alphabets indicate statistical significance at P < 0.05.
Cells 09 00146 g005
Table 1. Primers used for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR).
Table 1. Primers used for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR).
GenePrimer Sequence (5′→3′)Tm (°C)Size (bp)GenBank Accession
GAPDHF: ACTCACTCTTCTACCTTTGATGCT60100AF017079
R: TGTTGCTGTAGCCAAATTCA
PDHXF: TCACAGCACGCAGTCTCTTT60132XM_003122869.3
R: AAGGCATCTCCAGCACTCAC
SMCPF: CTGAGTGCACCTGCCTGAATA60106AY788095.1
R: TTGGACCCCTGTCTTGGACT
PGAM1F: GCGAGAGCCTGAAGGACACTATTG60138XM_003483535.4
R: CCTCCAGATGCTTGACGATGCC

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Liang, K.; Chang, Y.; Ran, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ali, M.A.; Dai, D.; Qazi, I.H.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, G.; et al. miR-26a is Involved in Glycometabolism and Affects Boar Sperm Viability by Targeting PDHX. Cells 2020, 9, 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010146

AMA Style

Wang W, Liang K, Chang Y, Ran M, Zhang Y, Ali MA, Dai D, Qazi IH, Zhang M, Zhou G, et al. miR-26a is Involved in Glycometabolism and Affects Boar Sperm Viability by Targeting PDHX. Cells. 2020; 9(1):146. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wencan, Kai Liang, Yu Chang, Mingxia Ran, Yan Zhang, Malik Ahsan Ali, Dinghui Dai, Izhar Hyder Qazi, Ming Zhang, Guangbin Zhou, and et al. 2020. "miR-26a is Involved in Glycometabolism and Affects Boar Sperm Viability by Targeting PDHX" Cells 9, no. 1: 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010146

APA Style

Wang, W., Liang, K., Chang, Y., Ran, M., Zhang, Y., Ali, M. A., Dai, D., Qazi, I. H., Zhang, M., Zhou, G., Yang, J., Angel, C., & Zeng, C. (2020). miR-26a is Involved in Glycometabolism and Affects Boar Sperm Viability by Targeting PDHX. Cells, 9(1), 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010146

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop