Next Article in Journal
CD8 Co-Receptor Enhances T-Cell Activation without Any Effect on Initial Attachment
Next Article in Special Issue
Radiologic Assessment of Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases: State of the Art and Recent Advances
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Radiation Lesions—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patient Derived Xenografts for Genome-Driven Therapy of Osteosarcoma
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

MiRNAs in Canine and Human Osteosarcoma: A Highlight Review on Comparative Biomolecular Aspects

by Leonardo Leonardi 1,*, Katia Scotlandi 2, Ilaria Pettinari 1, Maria Serena Benassi 2, Ilaria Porcellato 1 and Laura Pazzaglia 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 30 January 2021 / Revised: 10 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Advances and Therapy of Human Osteosarcoma)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

See the attachment

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, we would like to thank you very much for your precious suggestions. We have tried to correct and improve all the aspects suggested by you, in the hope of having correctly answered what was requested. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript Cells-1111875 

 

Reviewer comments

 

The manuscript entitled "Canine and Human Osteosarcoma: a highlight review on some of new comparative biomolecular aspects" by Leonardo Leonardi et al., is an interesting review comparing miRNAs aspects between human and dog osteosarcomas. The review covers the various implications of miRNAs in osteosarcoma tumor genesis with a systematic comparative approach between man and dog. This review is well structured considering successively tumor cell expressing miRNAs and circulating miRNAs.

The reviewer has no comment on this review. Some may wonder why the term miRNAs, corresponding to the central subject of the review, is not present in the title.

Whatever, the Reviewer recommends to accept this manuscript after an edition of the text for English usage.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, we would like to thank you very much for your precious suggestions. We have tried to correct and improve all the aspects suggested by you, in the hope of having correctly answered what was requested. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

In this paper, the authors reviewed the correlation of miRNA expression abnormalities in human and canine osteosarcoma. This review is very informative and the conclusion is adequate, however, following comments on Title and Figure 1 need to be improved by the authors:

1) Since this review focuses on only miRNAs, it is better to include miRNAs in the title.

2) In Figure1, it is recommended that the upregulated miRNA is shown in the upper row and the downregulated miRNA is shown in the lower row.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, we would like to thank you very much for your precious suggestions. We have tried to correct and improve all the aspects suggested by you, in the hope of having correctly answered what was requested. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop