Next Article in Journal
Geochemical and Ecological Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in a High-Cd Agricultural Ecosystem of Guangxi Karst Regions, China: Emphasis on Cd-Zn and Cd-Se Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Source-Dependent Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substitution on Rice Yield, Grain Quality, and Soil Properties in a Paddy System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exogenous Cytokinins Regulate Nitrogen Metabolism in Soybean Under Low Phosphorus Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Ecological and Metagenomic Characterisation of Wild Legume Habitats in Bulgaria: Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes

1
Department of Microbiology and Environmental Biotechnology, Faculty of Plant Protection and Agroecology, Agricultural University Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
3
Institute of Plant Genetic Resources “Konstantin Malkov”, Department of Plant Genetic Resources, 4122 Sadovo, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(9), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16090910
Submission received: 30 March 2026 / Revised: 24 April 2026 / Accepted: 28 April 2026 / Published: 30 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Developments in Biological Nitrogen Fixation in Plants)

Abstract

Wild relatives of cultivated legumes represent valuable genetic resources for crop improvement, ecosystem resilience, and sustainable agriculture. This study presents a comparative ecological and metagenomic assessment of three biogeographically distinct regions in Bulgaria—Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes—where populations of wild legumes, including Pisum elatius, Cicer montbrettii, Vicia incisa, and Lupinus spp., occur. Field expeditions were conducted during flowering and seed maturation stages, followed by rhizosphere soil sampling and high-throughput sequencing targeting bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS regions. Soil physicochemical properties, microbial diversity indices, and taxonomic composition were analysed and compared among regions. Distinct microbial community structures were identified. Kaliakra soils were dominated by Firmicutes (26–58%) and Proteobacteria (20–25%), while Strandzha soils showed higher abundance of Actinobacteriota (12–68%) and Proteobacteria (10–35%). The Eastern Rhodopes exhibited more balanced communities, with Proteobacteria (30–45%), Firmicutes (7–43%), and Actinobacteriota (3–11%). Fungal communities also differed significantly, with Nectriaceae dominating in Kaliakra, higher evenness in Strandzha, and intermediate diversity in the Eastern Rhodopes. Alpha diversity revealed the highest bacterial richness in Kaliakra, whereas the Eastern Rhodopes showed the greatest community evenness. Beta diversity analysis demonstrated clear regional separation driven by environmental filtering. These findings highlight the ecological and microbiological differentiation of wild legume habitats and support their conservation and utilisation in sustainable agriculture and breeding programs.

1. Introduction

Wild relatives of cultivated legumes represent an essential component of plant genetic resources and play a key role in sustainable agriculture, biodiversity conservation, and crop improvement. These species often possess valuable adaptive traits such as tolerance to drought, nutrient-poor soils, pests, and diseases, making them particularly important under conditions of climate change and environmental stress [1,2]. In addition to their genetic value, wild legumes contribute significantly to ecosystem functioning through biological nitrogen fixation, improvement of soil fertility, and stabilization of plant communities in marginal environments [3,4].
Legume–microbe interactions play a fundamental role in soil ecological processes. Rhizosphere microorganisms influence nutrient cycling, plant growth, and stress tolerance, and shape plant distribution and population stability [5,6]. Bacterial groups such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota are often associated with nitrogen fixation, nutrient mineralization, and plant growth promotion, while fungal communities contribute to organic matter decomposition, soil aggregation, and plant health [7,8]. Understanding soil microbiome composition associated with wild legumes is therefore essential for evaluating ecological adaptation and conservation potential.
Bulgaria represents one of the biodiversity-rich regions in Europe due to its diverse climatic conditions, complex geological structure, and heterogeneous landscapes. The country lies at the intersection of Mediterranean, continental, and steppe climatic zones, creating favorable conditions for the development of diverse plant communities and wild relatives of cultivated species [9,10]. Among these, wild legumes such as Pisum elatius, Cicer montbrettii, Vicia incisa, and species within the genus Lupinus represent valuable genetic resources with potential agricultural and ecological importance. Pisum elatius M. Bieb. is considered one of the most important wild relatives of cultivated pea (Pisum sativum L.). The species is widely distributed in southeastern Europe and the Mediterranean region and typically occurs in dry, rocky habitats, grasslands, and shrub vegetation [11,12]. Wild populations of P. elatius demonstrate considerable morphological and ecological variability, reflecting adaptation to local environmental conditions. These populations are particularly valuable for breeding programs aimed at improving abiotic stress tolerance and disease resistance [13].
Cicer montbrettii Jaub. & Spach is a wild relative of chickpea and endemic to southeastern Europe. In Bulgaria, the species is primarily associated with Strandzha Mountain habitats, where it occurs in forest–steppe and Mediterranean transitional ecosystems [14]. The species exhibits adaptation to marginal soils and environmental stress, making it an important genetic resource for chickpea improvement [15].
Vicia incisa, belonging to the Vicia sativa complex, is considered a rare species in Bulgaria and occurs mainly in Strandzha and Eastern Rhodope habitats. This species exhibits rapid growth, environmental adaptability, and high biomass production potential, making it suitable for forage production and soil improvement [16]. Additionally, species within the genus Lupinus have been reported in Strandzha and Eastern Rhodopes, although their distribution remains insufficiently studied.
The selected study regions—Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes—represent three ecologically contrasting environments. The Kaliakra region, located along the Northern Black Sea coast, is characterized by coastal steppe ecosystems, shallow rendzina soils, and strong maritime influence. The climate is relatively dry, with high solar radiation and strong winds. The geological substrate consists mainly of Sarmatian limestone and clay conglomerates, which form shallow soils with limited water retention [17,18]. These conditions create stress environments influencing plant–microbe interactions. The Strandzha Mountain region is characterized by transitional Mediterranean climate with higher precipitation and moderate temperatures. The soils are primarily cinnamon forest soils and yellow-earth podzolic soils rich in organic matter. Vegetation includes mesophilic forests and transitional ecosystems supporting diverse plant communities [19]. The Eastern Rhodopes represent volcanic landscapes with Mediterranean-continental transitional climate, heterogeneous terrain, and diverse vegetation. These environmental gradients create multiple ecological niches for wild legumes and associated microbial communities.
Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies allow for comprehensive characterisation of soil microbial communities. Metagenomic approaches enable analysis of microbial diversity, ecological interactions, and functional potential of soil microbiomes [20,21]. Comparative microbiome studies across ecological gradients are particularly important for understanding plant–soil–microbe interactions and identifying microbial indicators of ecosystem health.
The present study contributes to agronomy by linking ecological and metagenomic characterisation of wild legume habitats with their potential application in sustainable agricultural systems. Understanding rhizosphere microbiomes associated with crop wild relatives provides opportunities for identifying beneficial microorganisms that can be utilized as biofertilizers, biostimulants, or biocontrol agents, thereby supporting crop productivity, resilience, and soil health. From an agronomic perspective, wild relatives of legumes represent an important reservoir of beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms that can be exploited for sustainable crop production. Understanding the structure and function of these microbiomes provides opportunities for the development of biofertilizers, biostimulants, and biological control agents, contributing to improved soil fertility, nutrient use efficiency, and crop resilience under environmental stress conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Regions and Site Selection

Field surveys were conducted across three ecologically distinct regions of Bulgaria that are known to host or potentially host wild legume populations: Cape Kaliakra (Northern Black Sea Coast), Eastern Rhodopes (Madzharovo volcanic basin), and Strandzha Mountain (forest–steppe transition zone). Site coordinates, elevation, habitat structure, and dominant vegetation were recorded at each location. Habitat identification was guided by mapping, historical floristic records, and previous observations from national biodiversity monitoring programs. The survey targeted priority wild Fabaceae taxa, including Pisum elatius, Cicer montbrettii, Vicia incisa, and species within the Vicia sativa complex. These species were selected due to their ecological importance, conservation relevance, and their role as wild relatives of economically important legume crops, as well as their occurrence across contrasting environmental gradients.
From each region, rhizosphere soil samples were collected from three independent locations associated with natural habitats of wild legume species. Metagenomic analyses were performed separately for each sampling site, and the results were subsequently combined for regional comparison. The sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA1444713 (Submission ID: SUB16088483).

2.2. Field Expeditions and Sampling Design

Two major fieldwork phases were conducted to capture the main stages of plant development: Phase I (May), during mass flowering and early pod formation, and Phase II (late June), during pod maturation and full seed ripening. Field surveys were conducted along two predefined expedition routes selected to encompass the ecological and geographical variability of the study region. These transects covered coastal, steppe, and inland habitats, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of population characteristics, habitat conditions, and associated plant communities (Figure 1). A total of 14 composite rhizosphere soil samples were collected (3–5 subsamples per site; four sites per region) from a depth of 2–5 cm, corresponding to the active root zone. Subsamples were homogenized to obtain representative composite samples, and the results are reported as aggregated values at the regional level (Supplementary Table S1).
Expedition routes 1: Plovdiv → Kavarna → Cape Kaliakra → Bolata → Rusalka → Kamen Bryag → Yaylata → Tyulenovo → Shabla → Durankulak → Plovdiv.
This route traversed the Northern Black Sea coast, including Natura 2000 sites and protected areas characterized by coastal cliffs, steppe vegetation, and limestone plateaus. The chosen locations are known for hosting fragmented and vulnerable plant populations, making them particularly relevant for monitoring.
Expedition routes 2: Plovdiv → Harmanli → Borislavtsi → Madzharovo → Stambolovo → Plovdiv.
This inland transect covered transitional Mediterranean and continental habitats, including semi-natural grasslands, rocky slopes, and anthropogenically influenced areas. These sites provided contrast to the coastal localities and allowed for evaluation of population responses under different climatic and land-use conditions.
At each site, a standardized protocol was applied to characterize both the plant populations and their environmental context. Population size: The number of individuals per patch was counted or estimated depending on patch density. For clumped populations, individuals were quantified within clearly defined patch boundaries, while in more dispersed populations, belt transects were used to estimate abundance. Patch size, continuity, and degree of fragmentation were recorded to evaluate population structure and potential isolation effects. For the phenological stage, plants were assigned to phenological categories (vegetative growth, budding, flowering, fruiting, or senescence) to determine population-level reproductive status at the time of sampling. Rapid floristic surveys were carried out within and around each population patch. Dominant and co-occurring species were noted to characterize community type, competition intensity, and habitat preferences. Habitat vulnerability indicators were systematically evaluated. This included evidence of soil erosion, tourism pressure, grazing intensity (presence of livestock tracks, browsing signs), and vegetation degradation. These parameters were important for identifying threats to population viability and habitat stability. Seed material was collected only when populations were sufficiently robust and reproductive output allowed for sustainable harvesting. All sampling activities complied with ethical and regulatory requirements of the Ministry of Environment and Water, including adherence to national guidelines for conservation of protected species and habitats. Collected seeds were stored under controlled conditions and used exclusively for scientific analysis.

2.3. Morphological Characterisation of Plant Populations

Morphological characterisation of Pisum elatius and co-occurring Fabaceae species was conducted through detailed field observations following established botanical and taxonomic guidelines [11,22,23]. For each population, vegetative and reproductive traits were recorded to capture intra- and interspecific variability relevant to species identification, ecotypic differentiation, and habitat-associated morphological patterns. Vegetative traits included stem architecture, noting whether plants exhibited an erect or procumbent growth habit, the degree of branching, and any structural adaptations typical of wild pea phenotypes. Leaf morphology was examined by documenting leaflet shape, size, and arrangement, together with the development and configuration of tendrils, which are important diagnostic features in the genus Pisum and related legumes.
Reproductive characteristics were also systematically recorded. These included flower morphologies, encompassing color, corolla size, symmetry, and the number of flowers per inflorescence, all of which are key descriptors in Fabaceae systematics [24]. Pod traits, such as length, cross-sectional shape, coloration, and dehiscence pattern, were assessed in mature individuals to support reliable species identification and comparison across habitats. Additionally, seed characteristics—including seed size, shape, surface texture, and pigmentation—were documented, as these traits often reflect both genetic lineage and environmental influences [1]. To support taxonomic verification and long-term documentation, herbarium vouchers were prepared for all recorded populations following standard herbarium protocols [25]. Vouchers were pressed, dried, labeled with georeferenced locality data, and deposited in institutional collections for future reference and comparative studies.

2.4. Soil Sampling and Physicochemical Measurements

To characterize the edaphic conditions associated with the studied plant populations, rhizosphere soil samples were collected from representative individuals of Pisum elatius, Cicer montbrettii, and Vicia incisa wherever these species occurred along the expedition routes. Sampling focused on the immediate root zone, where soil–plant–microbe interactions are most intensive, as emphasized by [5,26].
Rhizosphere soil was carefully removed from the upper 2–5 cm of the soil profile by gently shaking soil adhering to fine roots, following minimally disruptive protocols described by Vandenkoornhuyse et al. (2015) [27]. For each habitat, three to five composite samples were collected. Each composite consisted of subsamples taken from multiple individuals within the same patch, ensuring representative coverage of local microhabitat heterogeneity. Samples were homogenized and stored in sterile polyethylene bags at 4 °C, following recommendations for minimizing post-collection changes in microbial activity [28]. In the laboratory, soil samples were air-dried, sieved to 2 mm, and analysed for basic physicochemical characteristics. Soil pH was determined in a 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension using a calibrated pH electrode, following ISO 10390 (2005) and the procedures outlined by Jones (2001) [29,30]. Electrical conductivity (EC) was measured in the same 1:2.5 extract with a conductivity meter, and expressed in µS cm−1, according to standard soil salinity assessment methods described by Rhoades (1996) [31]. These parameters were used to characterize the edaphic properties of each habitat and to support ecological interpretation of population structure and microbial community differences. Soil pH and EC are widely recognized as key drivers of microbial community assembly, influencing nutrient cycling, enzymatic activity, and root–microbe interactions [30,32].

2.5. DNA Extraction and Amplicon Sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of each rhizosphere soil sample using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol to obtain high-quality nucleic acids suitable for downstream molecular analyses. This extraction method combines mechanical bead-beating and chemical lysis to efficiently disrupt microbial cells embedded in soil particles and organic matter, thereby providing representative DNA extracts of the rhizosphere microbial community [33]. Two taxonomically informative marker regions were selected for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. For bacterial community profiling, the V1–V3 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the universal primer pair 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 534R (5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′), which are widely used for assessing prokaryotic diversity across environmental samples [34,35]. For fungal community analysis, the ITS1 region of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was amplified using the ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) primer pair, commonly employed for fungal diversity and taxonomic identification [36,37].
PCR amplification was performed using region-specific primers containing Illumina adapter overhang sequences to facilitate downstream library preparation following established amplicon sequencing workflows [20,38]. Amplification reactions were conducted in 25 μL volumes containing 12.5 μL of KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 0.2 μM of each primer, and approximately 10 ng of template DNA. PCR cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 25–30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min, following widely adopted high-fidelity amplification protocols for amplicon sequencing [39].
PCR products were verified by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels stained with GelRed nucleic acid stain (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA). Amplicons were purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) to remove primer dimers and non-specific amplification products.
Purified amplicons were subsequently indexed using dual-index barcodes with the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) to enable multiplexing of samples in a single sequencing run. Dual indexing significantly reduces index hopping and barcode misassignment during high-throughput sequencing [40]. Both libraries were quantified using the Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and normalized prior to pooling. Accurate library quantification ensures even representation of samples in multiplexed sequencing runs [41,42]. The pooled libraries were subjected to paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), following standard manufacturer protocols. High-quality paired-end reads were generated to ensure robust coverage and accurate taxonomic assignment [20,42]. All sequencing procedures were carried out by a certified sequencing service provider, Novogene Europe (Cambridge, UK), which followed strict quality control standards for library preparation, cluster generation, and data output.

2.6. Library Preparation

Amplicon libraries were prepared following the standard Illumina amplicon sequencing workflow with minor modifications commonly applied in microbial community studies [20,42]. After successful PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V1–V3 regions) and fungal ITS1 region, library preparation was performed in several sequential steps. Initial PCR products were purified using magnetic bead–based cleanup with AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) to remove primer dimers, residual nucleotides, enzymes, and non-specific amplification fragments.
Purified amplicons were subjected to a second PCR step to incorporate dual-index barcodes and Illumina sequencing adapters using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Dual indexing minimizes barcode misassignment and allows for accurate multiplexing of multiple samples within a single sequencing run [40,42]. Libraries were quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit and Qubit 4 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Library fragment size distribution and quality were assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Accurate quantification and size verification are critical for ensuring even sample representation in multiplexed sequencing runs and improving downstream data quality [43] Equimolar amounts of each indexed library were pooled into a single sequencing-ready mixture. The pooled libraries underwent final quality control to verify concentration, fragment size distribution, and overall integrity prior to sequencing. These procedures follow established best practices for amplicon sequencing and ensure generation of high-quality paired-end reads suitable for microbial community analysis [20,21]. Library preparation and sequencing were conducted according to Illumina recommendations and widely accepted protocols for microbial amplicon sequencing, ensuring reliable and reproducible characterisation of bacterial and fungal diversity in rhizosphere soil samples.

2.7. Bioinformatics and Sequence Processing

Bioinformatic processing of the Illumina-generated paired-end reads was performed using the QIIME 2 analytical platform (version 2024.10), which provides a reproducible, modular framework for amplicon-based microbial community analysis [21]. Raw FASTQ files were demultiplexed and imported into QIIME 2, followed by standardized sequence quality control procedures. Initial inspection of read quality profiles guided trimming of low-quality regions and removal of sequencing artefacts. This step ensured that downstream analyses were based on high-quality sequence data and followed widely accepted recommendations for amplicon-based studies [44]. Quality filtering and trimming were performed using QIIME 2 integrated tools, removing ambiguous bases, low-quality reads, and sequencing artefacts. High-resolution Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) were inferred using the DADA2 algorithm implemented in the q2-dada2 plugin [43]. The DADA2 workflow includes error-rate learning, dereplication, denoising, merging of paired-end reads, and removal of sequencing errors. This method improves taxonomic resolution compared to traditional Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) clustering and allows for identification of biologically meaningful sequence variants. During this process, chimeric sequences were identified and removed using the consensus method implemented in DADA2, reducing artificial inflation of diversity estimates and improving taxonomic accuracy. Taxonomic assignment of the resulting ASVs was conducted using a Naïve Bayes classifier implemented in the QIIME 2 feature-classifier plugin [44]. For bacterial communities, 16S rRNA gene sequences were classified against the SILVA reference database (release 138.1), a curated and widely used resource in microbial ecology [45]. Fungal ITS sequences were classified using the UNITE reference database (version 9.0), which provides curated species hypothesis clusters for fungal ITS regions [46]. The resulting feature tables, taxonomic assignments, and representative sequences were exported for downstream ecological and statistical analyses, including alpha diversity, beta diversity, ordination analyses, and community composition comparisons.

2.8. Alpha Diversity

Alpha diversity metrics were calculated to assess microbial richness and evenness within each rhizosphere soil sample. Multiple complementary diversity indices were applied to capture different aspects of within-sample microbial diversity. Species richness was estimated using the Chao1 index, a non-parametric estimator that accounts for the number of rare taxa and provides a more accurate approximation of true richness in under sampled or heterogeneous microbial communities [47]. To evaluate both species richness and the relative distribution of taxa, the Shannon diversity index was calculated. This metric incorporates both abundance and evenness, offering a comprehensive measure of community complexity and diversity [48]. The Shannon index is widely used in microbial ecology studies to assess differences in microbial community structure across environmental gradients [49]. Additionally, the ACE (Abundance-based Coverage Estimator) index was calculated as an alternative richness estimator emphasizing the contribution of less abundant taxa. The ACE index improves sensitivity for detecting diversity patterns in microbial communities characterized by a large proportion of rare species, which is commonly observed in soil microbiomes [50] Alpha diversity metrics were calculated using QIIME 2 (https://qiime2.org, accessed on 20 September 2025) and further processed in R (version 4.3.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 28 September 2025) using the phyloseq and vegan packages for ecological diversity analysis. These indices provided a robust characterisation of alpha diversity, allowing for comparison of microbial richness and community structure across the different habitats and plant-associated rhizospheres examined in this study.

2.9. Beta Diversity and Statistical Analysis

Beta diversity analyses were performed to evaluate differences in microbial community composition among the various habitats and plant-associated rhizosphere samples. Community dissimilarity was quantified using the Bray–Curtis distance metric, a widely applied abundance-based index that captures differences in community composition while being robust to variations in sampling depth and suitable for zero-inflated ecological datasets [51]. This measure is particularly appropriate for microbial community data, where taxa abundance distributions are often uneven and dominated by rare species. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) was performed to visualize patterns of microbial community variation and identify major axes of compositional differences among samples. PCoA is a commonly used ordination method that transforms distance matrices into orthogonal axes representing variation in community composition [52]. This approach facilitates interpretation of ecological gradients and clustering patterns associated with environmental factors and plant species. Beta diversity analyses were conducted using QIIME 2 (https://qiime2.org, accessed on 2 October 2025) and further visualized using R (version 4.3.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 20 September 2025) with the vegan and phyloseq packages. These analyses provided a comprehensive assessment of beta diversity, enabling evaluation of how microbial communities differ across environmental gradients, geographical regions, and plant-associated rhizospheres. Statistical differences in microbial community composition among regions were assessed using PERMANOVA (Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices. Due to the aggregated nature of the dataset at the regional level, PERMANOVA was applied to evaluate overall compositional differences among regions. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used. Differences in taxa abundance were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction. These approaches are widely recommended for microbiome data due to their robustness to non-normal distributions and compositional structure.

2.10. Differential Abundance and Biomarker Detection

To identify microbial taxa that were differentially abundant among habitats and host legume species, we employed LEfSe (Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size), a widely used method for biomarker discovery in microbial ecology [53]. LEfSe integrates non-parametric statistical testing with effect-size estimation, enabling detection of biologically meaningful differences in microbial relative abundances across predefined groups. The workflow began with a Kruskal–Wallis test to identify taxa showing statistically significant differences among the studied habitats. A significance threshold of α = 0.05 was applied, consistent with recommended parameters for LEfSe-based analyses. Taxa passing this initial screening step were subsequently subjected to Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) to estimate the magnitude of their effect size, with an LDA score cutoff of 2.0 used to retain only robust and discriminatory biomarkers. This approach allowed us to pinpoint bacterial and fungal taxa that consistently characterized the microbial communities associated with environmental gradients across the Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes regions. By integrating statistical significance with effect-size estimation, LEfSe provided a reliable means of identifying biomarkers that contribute to habitat-specific microbial signatures and potential ecological differentiation among legume-associated rhizosphere communities.

2.11. Ethical Considerations and Permit Compliance

All sampling activities were conducted in compliance with Bulgarian biodiversity conservation legislation. Collection of seeds and plant material followed the regulations of the Ministry of Environment and Water, Republic of Bulgaria, and adhered to established limits for sampling within protected habitats. No destructive sampling of endangered or legally protected species was undertaken.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution and Habitat Characteristics of Wild Fabaceae Species

3.1.1. Distribution and Habitat Characteristics in Kaliakra Peninsula

The Pisum elatius population on the Kaliakra Peninsula was found in compact clusters of approximately 10–15 individuals occupying steep Sarmatian limestone slopes. The substrates—characterized by weathered limestone interlayered with iron-rich clay conglomerates—supported a diverse steppe vegetation complex with more than 450 documented vascular plant species (Figure 2). Despite its botanical richness, the habitat is subject to several vulnerability factors, including persistent strong winds, intense solar exposure, ongoing soil erosion, and substantial tourist pressure along the coastal cliffs. At the Yaylata Archaeological Complex, P. elatius occurred within more sheltered steppe vegetation, where higher plant density and reduced anthropogenic disturbance contributed to relatively stable microhabitats. Plants displayed typical wild pea morphology, including semi-erect stems, dark-violet corollas, and mature seeds with a characteristic brown to black wrinkled testa. The area’s rocky terraces and mesic steppe conditions appear favorable for sustaining viable populations.
The population located at Cape Kaliakra appears more vulnerable due to its exposure to harsh environmental conditions. Plants occur in open habitats subjected to intense solar radiation, strong winds, and active erosion processes, in addition to continuous tourist pressure associated with the coastal cliffs. These factors may limit population size, reduce regeneration potential, and increase the risk of habitat degradation. In contrast, the population identified within the Yailata Archaeological Reserve is relatively more protected. The plant communities in this locality are denser, with a higher abundance of accompanying species that provide partial shelter and contribute to improved microhabitat conditions. Furthermore, restricted tourist access in the protected area reduces anthropogenic disturbance and supports population stability. In situ conservation of Pisum elatius could be implemented through regular monitoring of population dynamics, habitat conditions, and potential threats. Additional field expeditions are necessary, particularly during the early seed maturation stage, to enable the collection of sufficient seed material in accordance with regulations established by the Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water. Such collections would support comprehensive morphological, genetic, and ecological analyses. The development of efficient seed germination protocols and the establishment of ex situ collections are recommended. These measures would contribute to long-term conservation and facilitate the use of P. elatius genetic resources in pea breeding programs aimed at improving stress tolerance, productivity, and adaptability. Differences in the level of detail among species reflect their relative abundance and ecological relevance in the studied habitats.

3.1.2. Distribution and Habitat Characteristics in Eastern Rhodopes (Madzharovo Region)

A newly identified population in the Eastern Rhodopes was recorded on a south-facing volcanic slope, marking an important extension of the known distribution range. Seeds collected from this location exhibited a distinctive light-green pigmentation with black mottling—a morphotype not previously documented in Bulgaria but described in neighbouring regions such as Serbia [16]. This unique seed phenotype has a potential local adaptation or previously unreported genetic variation within the species. According to morphological observations, plants from this newly identified locality did not differ substantially from the populations previously described at Cape Kaliakra and the Yailata area. The stems were semi-erect to semi-prostrate, weakly branched, and glabrous. Inflorescences predominantly produced a single flower per peduncle, and only rarely two flowers were observed. The standard petal exhibited dark violet coloration, while the wings were light purple. Pods were broad and linear, with yellow to brown coloration at maturity. Each pod contained between five and eight seeds, which were spherical, smooth, and light green with characteristic black mottling. The morphological characteristics observed in this population correspond well to previously described Pisum elatius populations, which are known for considerable phenotypic variability influenced by environmental conditions and geographical distribution. However, the distinctive seed coat coloration observed in this population has not previously been documented in Bulgaria, and therefore represents a newly recorded phenotype for the country. A population with similar seed coat coloration has been previously reported by researchers from the University of Novi Sad, Serbia, who identified Pisum elatius plants at the foothills of Mount Kozjak, in habitats located between forest and meadow vegetation near the Pčinja River [16]. The occurrence of similar phenotypes in geographically separated regions may indicate adaptive differentiation or shared genetic background among Balkan wild pea populations. These findings further support the importance of wild Pisum elatius populations as valuable genetic resources for conservation and breeding programs, particularly for traits related to environmental adaptability and stress tolerance. Populations of the Vicia sativa complex, including V. incisa, were confirmed in the Madzharovo region. Earlier records from Strandzha were validated but not examined in detail during this survey. These findings contribute to the growing understanding of Fabaceae diversity in transitional forest–steppe zones. Potential habitats suitable for Lupinus species were identified in both the Eastern Rhodopes and Strandzha, although no stable populations were observed. Targeted field investigations are planned to clarify the distribution and ecological requirements of these taxa (Figure 3).

3.2. Soil Physicochemical Parameters

Across the surveyed regions, soil properties varied according to geological substrate and vegetation type. Soils in the Kaliakra region were slightly alkaline, reflecting the presence of shallow calcareous Rendzic Leptosols developed on limestone substrates. In contrast, soils from the Strandzha region (Golemiya Pazvlak locality) were classified as Chromic Luvisols and Cambisols (cinnamon forest soils), showing slightly alkaline to near-neutral reaction. The soils from the Madzharovo area in the Eastern Rhodopes were classified as Skeletic Cambisols and Leptosols formed on volcanic substrates and exhibited near-neutral pH values. These soil types are characteristic of well-drained steppe, forest–steppe, and rocky slope environments, respectively, and support diverse microbial assemblages. Electrical conductivity (EC) values were consistently very low across all sites, indicating minimal salinity and limited accumulation of soluble salts. Such conditions are generally favorable for microbial activity and plant–microbe interactions. Representative soil samples were collected from natural habitats located in Cape Kaliakra, the Strandzha region (Golemiya Pazvlak), and Madzharovo in the Eastern Rhodopes. Prior to sampling, the surface soil layer (2–5 cm) was carefully cleared of roots, stones, and plant debris to avoid contamination. Soil samples were collected for microbiological and molecular analyses and transported in sterile containers under cooled conditions to preserve DNA integrity and prevent post-sampling microbial activity. The sampling sites differed in vegetation cover and physicochemical characteristics, which are known to influence microbial community composition, particularly nitrogen-fixing bacteria and actinomycetes. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured as key physicochemical parameters. Soil pH values ranged from moderately alkaline in Kaliakra (pH 7.7) to slightly alkaline in Strandzha (pH 7.5) and neutral in Madzharovo (pH 6.6), conditions that are generally favorable for microbial activity and nutrient availability. Electrical conductivity remained very low across all soils, indicating low levels of readily soluble salts and absence of salinity stress (Table 1).

3.3. Microbial Community Composition

3.3.1. Bacterial Communities

The bacterial community composition differed markedly among the three studied regions (Figure 4A). The Kaliakra soils were dominated by Bacillus and Pseudomonas were dominant taxa in Kaliakra soils, calcareous soils and plant growth-promoting functions. In contrast, the Strandzha region exhibited greater taxonomic diversity, including higher relative abundance of Acidothermus, Rummeliibacillus, and Rhodanobacter, which are typically associated with forest soils and organic matter-rich environments. The Eastern Rhodopes soils showed increased relative abundance of Noviherbaspirillum, Ramlibacter, and Aneurinibacillus, taxa often linked to nutrient-limited and rocky habitats. Differences in microbial community composition were observed among regions. The fungal community composition showed clear regional differentiation among the three studied habitats, reflecting variations in soil conditions, vegetation structure, and environmental stress factors.

3.3.2. Fungal Communities

Fungal communities represent a fundamental component of soil microbiomes, playing essential roles in nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, plant health, and ecosystem stability (Figure 4B). The fungal community composition showed clear regional differentiation among the three studied habitats, reflecting variations in soil conditions, vegetation structure, and environmental stress factors. The Kaliakra region exhibited a strong dominance of Fusarium, representing the most abundant fungal genus. A high relative abundance of Fusarium was observed in Kaliakra soils. The presence of Humicola and minor proportions of Aspergillus and Penicillium further supports the adaptation of fungal communities to xeric and nutrient-limited environments typical of coastal steppe habitats. In the Eastern Rhodopes (Madzharovo) region, fungal communities were more balanced and diverse. In addition to Fusarium, relatively higher abundances of Humicola, Mortagnula, Aspergillus, and Penicillium were observed. Higher fungal diversity was observed in the Eastern Rhodopes region.
The presence of Purpureocillium and Schizothecium suggests active organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling processes. The Strandzha region displayed the highest fungal diversity, with multiple genera present at moderate abundances, including Penicillium, Aspergillus, Purpureocillium, Humicola, and Talaromyces. Such diversity is consistent with forest-influenced soils characterized by higher moisture availability, organic matter content, and stable microclimatic conditions. The relatively lower abundance of Fusarium compared to the other regions reveals reduced dominance of stress-adapted taxa. The fungal community analysis suggests that Strandzha soils harbor the highest diversity, Eastern Rhodopes exhibit moderate diversity with balanced communities, and Kaliakra soils are dominated by stress-tolerant taxa, particularly Fusarium. These patterns indicate that environmental gradients, including soil type, moisture availability, and vegetation cover, strongly shape fungal community composition in wild legume habitats across Bulgaria.

3.4. Alpha Diversity of Bacterial and Fungal Communities Across the Studied Regions

Alpha diversity analysis revealed distinct differences in bacterial and fungal community structure among rhizosphere soils collected from the Strandzha, Kaliakra, and Eastern Rhodopes regions (Table 2). Bacterial communities exhibited high richness and diversity across all studied regions. The highest bacterial richness was observed in the Kaliakra region, with Chao1 and observed feature values of 5190.39 and 5139, respectively. The Eastern Rhodopes soils showed slightly lower but still high richness (Chao1 = 4726.67; observed features = 4690), whereas the Strandzha region demonstrated the lowest bacterial richness (Chao1 = 3828.42; observed features = 3806). These results indicate substantial differences in bacterial community complexity among the studied ecosystems. Similarly, bacterial diversity indices revealed high microbial diversity in all regions. The Shannon index reached its highest value in Kaliakra (10.000), followed by Eastern Rhodopes (9.954) and Strandzha (9.458). Simpson index values were consistently high across all regions (0.988–0.995), indicating low dominance and highly diverse bacterial communities. The highest Simpson value was observed in Eastern Rhodopes (0.995), revealing the most evenly distributed bacterial community. Pielou evenness values further supported these observations, with the highest evenness recorded in Eastern Rhodopes (0.816), followed by Kaliakra (0.811) and Strandzha (0.795). Consistently, the lowest dominance value was detected in Eastern Rhodopes (0.005), indicating a more balanced bacterial community structure compared to the other regions.
Fungal communities exhibited lower richness and diversity compared to bacterial communities but followed similar regional patterns (Table 2). The highest fungal richness was recorded in Kaliakra (Chao1 = 2049.04; observed features = 2012), followed by Eastern Rhodopes (Chao1 = 1887.19; observed features = 1854), while the lowest richness was detected in Strandzha (Chao1 = 1422.58; observed features = 1409). Fungal diversity indices also showed moderate diversity levels. The highest Shannon diversity values were observed in Kaliakra (6.449) and Eastern Rhodopes (6.436), whereas Strandzha exhibited lower fungal diversity (6.051). Simpson index values ranged from 0.934 to 0.958, with the highest value again detected in Eastern Rhodopes, indicating lower dominance and more evenly distributed fungal taxa in this region. Pielou evenness values for fungal communities were relatively lower than those observed for bacteria, ranging from 0.578 in Strandzha to 0.593 in Eastern Rhodopes. The lowest dominance value for fungi was also observed in Eastern Rhodopes (0.042), further indicating a more balanced fungal community structure. Good’s coverage values were consistently high across all regions for both bacterial and fungal communities (>0.99), confirming sufficient sequencing depth and reliable representation of microbial diversity.

3.5. Beta Diversity of Bacterial and Fungal Communities Across Regions

Beta diversity analysis revealed distinct patterns of microbial community differentiation among rhizosphere soils from the Strandzha, Kaliakra, and the Eastern Rhodopes regions (Figure 5). The pairwise dissimilarity values indicated stronger regional separation in bacterial communities compared to fungal communities. Bacterial beta diversity analysis demonstrated pronounced differences among the studied regions (Figure 5A). The highest dissimilarity was observed between Kaliakra and Strandzha (0.920), followed by Strandzha and Eastern Rhodopes (0.907), indicating substantial differences in bacterial community composition involving the Strandzha region. In contrast, the lowest dissimilarity value was detected between Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes (0.563), showing relatively more similar bacterial assemblages between these two regions. These results indicate that bacterial communities in Strandzha are compositionally distinct, whereas Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes share a greater proportion of bacterial taxa. The high beta diversity values (>0.90) between Strandzha and the other regions suggest strong environmental filtering and regional heterogeneity influencing bacterial community structure. Such pronounced differentiation may reflect differences in soil physicochemical properties, vegetation composition, and climatic conditions among the regions.
In contrast to bacterial communities, fungal beta diversity values were considerably lower (Figure 5B), indicating more homogeneous fungal community composition across regions. The highest fungal dissimilarity was observed between Strandzha and Eastern Rhodopes (0.351), while slightly lower values were detected between Strandzha and Kaliakra (0.293) and between Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes (0.291). These results suggest that fungal communities exhibit greater compositional similarity among regions compared to bacterial communities. The relatively moderate dissimilarity values indicate that fungal taxa are more widely distributed and less influenced by regional environmental variation. The slightly higher dissimilarity involving Strandzha again suggests that this region harbors somewhat distinct fungal assemblages.
A clear contrast between bacterial and fungal beta diversity patterns was observed. Bacterial communities exhibited substantially higher dissimilarity values (0.563–0.920), indicating strong regional differentiation. In contrast, fungal communities showed lower dissimilarity values (0.291–0.351), associated with more stable and homogeneous community composition across regions.
PERMANOVA analysis confirmed that microbial community composition differed significantly among regions (p < 0.05), supporting the observed clustering patterns in Bray–Curtis-based analyses. PERMANOVA analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity revealed significant differences in microbial community composition among regions (p = 0.033, R2 = 0.87). These results support the observed patterns of regional separation and confirm that microbial communities differ significantly across the studied habitats.

3.6. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) Based on Bray–Curtis Distances of Bacterial and Fungal Communities

Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) based on Bray–Curtis distances revealed clear regional differentiation of microbial communities among Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes (Figure 6). These patterns indicate that environmental conditions strongly influence rhizosphere microbiome composition across the studied habitats. The bacterial PCoA explained 29.01% of the total variation (PC1 = 16.88%, PC2 = 12.13%). Samples from Strandzha formed a compact and clearly separated cluster, indicating relatively homogeneous bacterial communities (Figure 6A). In contrast, Kaliakra samples showed greater dispersion, indicating higher community variability, likely related to heterogeneous coastal steppe conditions. The Eastern Rhodopes samples occupied an intermediate position, with moderate dispersion, reflecting transitional environmental characteristics. Partial overlap between Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes indicates some similarity in bacterial assemblages, whereas Strandzha remained distinct.
The fungal PCoA explained 31.67% of the total variation (PC1 = 19.3%, PC2 = 12.37%) (Figure 6B). Compared with bacteria, fungal communities showed greater overlap among regions, indicating lower regional differentiation. Strandzha samples formed a relatively distinct group, while Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes exhibited broader dispersion. The Eastern Rhodopes demonstrated the highest variability, consistent with heterogeneous environmental conditions. Bacterial communities showed stronger regional separation than fungal communities, indicating higher sensitivity to environmental variation. In contrast, fungal communities exhibited greater overlap, characterized by broader ecological tolerance and functional stability across habitats. These results confirm that environmental gradients play a stronger role in shaping bacterial communities, while fungal communities appear more resilient across different regions.

3.7. Differential Abundance of Microbial Taxa

Figure 7 presents the distribution of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values, comparing within-region and between-region microbial community variation across Strandzha, Kaliakra, and the Eastern Rhodopes. Within-region comparisons reveal relatively low dissimilarity values across all three regions, indicating a high degree of compositional similarity among samples within the same geographic location. Among them, the Eastern Rhodopes exhibit the lowest median dissimilarity, suggesting a more homogeneous microbial community structure. In contrast, Kaliakra shows slightly higher within-region variability, implying greater heterogeneity in microbial composition at the local scale. Between-region comparisons display markedly higher Bray–Curtis dissimilarity values relative to within-region comparisons, demonstrating clear differentiation in microbial community composition across geographic regions. The highest dissimilarity is observed between Kaliakra and the Eastern Rhodopes, indicating the strongest compositional divergence between these two regions. Comparisons between Strandzha and Kaliakra also show substantial dissimilarity, while Strandzha and the Eastern Rhodopes exhibit comparatively lower—but still distinct—differences. The separation between within- and between-region dissimilarity distributions highlights the presence of region-specific microbial assemblages. This pattern supports the hypothesis that geographic and environmental factors play a significant role in structuring rhizosphere microbial communities. The results indicate that microbial communities are more similar within regions than between them, with Kaliakra representing the most distinct microbial profile among the studied locations.
The Kruskal–Wallis analysis presented in Table 3 revealed statistically significant differences in the relative abundance of Bacillus among regions (H = 6.45, p = 0.039). Post hoc Dunn’s test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction indicated significant pairwise differences between Strandzha and Kaliakra (adjusted p < 0.05). Similarly, the relative abundance of Fusarium differed significantly among regions (H = 8.12, p = 0.017), suggesting region-specific distribution patterns of this taxon.
The post hoc analysis presented in Table 4 using Dunn’s test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction revealed significant pairwise differences in taxa abundance between Strandzha and Kaliakra (adjusted p = 0.042), as well as between Kaliakra and the Eastern Rhodopes (adjusted p = 0.015). In contrast, no significant differences were observed between Strandzha and the Eastern Rhodopes (adjusted p = 0.219). These results indicate that Kaliakra represents a distinct microbial profile compared to the other regions, while Strandzha and the Eastern Rhodopes exhibit more similar community compositions.

3.8. Functional Prediction of Bacterial and Fungal Communities

Functional prediction of bacterial communities revealed similar metabolic profiles across the studied regions, with several dominant functional groups contributing to soil ecological processes (Figure 8A). Chemoheterotrophy and aerobic chemoheterotrophy were the predominant predicted metabolic functions in all regions, indicating that organic carbon degradation represents the major ecological process in rhizosphere soils. The relative abundance of chemoheterotrophic bacteria was highest in the Strandzha region, followed by Kaliakra, whereas the lowest abundance was observed in the Eastern Rhodopes soils. A similar trend was observed for aerobic chemoheterotrophy, showing higher microbial activity associated with organic matter decomposition in Strandzha soils. Cellulolysis-related functions were also more abundant in Strandzha and Kaliakra compared to the Eastern Rhodopes, indicating enhanced plant residue decomposition and carbon turnover in these regions. Additionally, fermentation and ureolysis functions were present in all samples, although at lower relative abundance, indicating contributions to nitrogen cycling and anaerobic microenvironment processes. Nitrogen cycling functions, including nitrification, nitrate reduction, nitrate respiration, and nitrogen respiration, were detected across all regions but represented a smaller fraction of the predicted functional profiles. Aerobic ammonia oxidation was observed at low abundance levels, indicating potential nitrifying activity in rhizosphere soils. The functional prediction suggests that carbon cycling-related processes dominate bacterial metabolic activity, while nitrogen cycling functions contribute to maintaining nutrient availability in the studied soils. The relatively similar functional profiles across regions indicate functional redundancy despite taxonomic differences observed in microbial community composition.
Fungal functional guild analysis revealed that saprotrophic fungi dominated across all studied regions, highlighting their key ecological role in organic matter decomposition (Figure 8B). Unassigned taxa represented the largest proportion, particularly in Strandzha soils, indicating the presence of poorly characterized fungal groups in the rhizosphere. Plant pathogen-associated guilds were more abundant in Strandzha soils compared to Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes. The higher relative abundance of plant pathogens may reflect increased plant–microbe interactions and complex rhizosphere dynamics in this region. Plant pathogen–soil saprotroph–wood saprotroph guilds were particularly enriched in Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes, associated with multifunctional fungal communities involved in both decomposition and plant-associated interactions. Additionally, undefined saprotrophic fungi were abundant across all regions, particularly in Strandzha and Eastern Rhodopes soils, indicating active decomposition processes. Fungal parasite and dung saprotroph guilds were detected at lower abundance levels across all regions, indicating secondary ecological roles. Furthermore, complex guilds such as animal pathogen–dung saprotroph–endophyte–plant pathogen were present in low abundance, indicating diverse ecological strategies within fungal communities. Fungal functional guilds demonstrated that saprotrophic and plant-associated fungi dominate rhizosphere communities across regions. While taxonomic composition varied, the functional profiles were relatively similar, indicating functional redundancy and stable ecological processes across the studied soils. These findings highlight that both bacterial and fungal communities contribute to key soil ecological functions, particularly carbon decomposition and nutrient cycling, supporting soil fertility and plant growth in the studied regions.

4. Discussion

4.1. Regional Structuring of Rhizosphere Microbial Communities

The present study demonstrates clear regional differentiation of rhizosphere microbial communities associated with wild legume habitats across Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes. Beta diversity analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, supported by PERMANOVA, confirmed that microbial community composition differs significantly among regions. These patterns indicate that geographical and environmental factors play a key role in shaping microbial assemblages.
The observed clustering of samples in the PCoA ordination reflects distinct compositional profiles among regions. Strandzha samples formed a well-defined cluster, whereas Kaliakra and Eastern Rhodopes showed partial overlap, indicating differences in community structure across environmental gradients. Such spatial structuring of soil microbiomes has been widely reported and is typically associated with variation in soil physicochemical properties, vegetation composition, and climatic conditions.

4.2. Ecological Differentiation of Wild Legume Habitats

The three investigated regions—Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes—represent ecologically contrasting environments that influence both plant populations and associated rhizosphere microbial communities. Coastal steppe habitats in Kaliakra are characterized by shallow calcareous soils, strong winds, and limited water availability, creating stressful environmental conditions for plant establishment. Such environments are known to promote adaptive traits in wild legumes and select for stress-tolerant microbial [11,54]. In contrast, the Eastern Rhodopes represent heterogeneous volcanic landscapes with transitional Mediterranean-continental climate conditions. The diverse terrain and vegetation provide multiple ecological niches, which likely contributed to the more balanced microbial communities observed in this region. Similar relationships between habitat heterogeneity and microbial diversity have been reported in Mediterranean ecosystems, where environmental variability promotes community stability and resilience [55]. The Strandzha region differs from the other two areas by its higher precipitation and forest-influenced ecosystems. These conditions support increased organic matter accumulation and more complex plant communities, which may explain the higher abundance of Actinobacteriota and enhanced microbial metabolic activity observed in this region. Previous studies have demonstrated that vegetation structure and organic matter availability strongly influence rhizosphere microbial composition [8,34].

4.3. Soil Properties and Microbial Community Structure

Soil physicochemical characteristics differed among the three regions and likely contributed to microbial community differentiation. Alkaline soils in Kaliakra favored Firmicutes-dominated communities, which are often associated with stress tolerance and drought adaptation. In contrast, Strandzha soils supported higher proportions of Actinobacteriota, commonly linked to organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling. The Eastern Rhodopes showed more balanced bacterial community composition, suggesting more stable ecological conditions. Similar patterns have been observed in Mediterranean ecosystems, where soil heterogeneity and vegetation diversity influence microbial community assembly and ecosystem functioning [5,54]. These results showed that environmental gradients across Bulgarian wild legume habitats shape microbial community composition while maintaining ecological functionality.

4.4. Taxa-Specific Variation and Ecological Implications

Significant differences in the relative abundance of selected taxa, including Bacillus and Fusarium, indicate region-specific microbial signatures. These taxa are widely reported as key components of soil microbial communities and are frequently associated with plant–microbe interactions.
Members of the genus Bacillus are commonly reported as plant growth-promoting bacteria with roles in nutrient mobilization, phytohormone production, and stress tolerance. Their occurrence across the studied habitats confirms their widespread presence in rhizosphere environments associated with wild legumes.
Similarly, Fusarium species are commonly detected in soil ecosystems and represent an important component of fungal communities. The variation in their relative abundance across regions reflects differences in microbial community structure under contrasting environmental conditions.
The observed differences in taxa abundance support the concept that rhizosphere microbial communities are shaped by both environmental filtering and plant-associated factors. The coexistence of bacterial and fungal taxa across all regions indicates that core microbial groups are maintained across habitats, while their relative abundances vary depending on local conditions.

4.5. Functional Prediction and Microbial Activity

Functional prediction revealed that chemoheterotrophy and aerobic chemoheterotrophy dominated across all regions, indicating that carbon cycling represents the primary ecological process in rhizosphere soils. The higher abundance of these functions in Strandzha suggests enhanced organic matter decomposition under more humid conditions. Despite taxonomic differences among regions, functional profiles were relatively similar, indicating functional redundancy within microbial communities. Functional redundancy is considered an important mechanism for maintaining ecosystem stability under environmental fluctuations [54]. These results revealed that wild legume habitats in Bulgaria support functionally stable microbial communities that contribute to plant adaptation, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem resilience. The observed microbial communities associated with wild legumes may represent an important reservoir of beneficial microorganisms that could be exploited in agricultural systems. Genera such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and Variovorax are widely recognized for their plant growth-promoting properties, including nitrogen fixation, phytohormone production, and stress mitigation. Their presence in natural habitats suggests that wild legumes serve as ecological niches for beneficial microbiota that could be harnessed for crop improvement. The observed differences in the relative abundance of Bacillus and Fusarium among regions highlight the influence of environmental and geographic factors on microbial community composition. The higher abundance of Bacillus in certain regions may be associated with its well-documented role as a plant growth-promoting bacterium, contributing to nutrient cycling, phytohormone production, and stress tolerance. In contrast, the elevated abundance of Fusarium in specific regions may reflect environmental conditions that are favorable for phytopathogenic fungi or differences in host plant–microbe interactions. These findings suggest that regional ecological factors shape the distribution of both beneficial and potentially harmful microorganisms, reinforcing the importance of local microbiome characterization for sustainable agricultural management.
The observed pairwise differences suggest that the microbial communities in Kaliakra are more distinct, potentially reflecting unique environmental conditions such as soil properties, climate, or plant–microbe interactions. In contrast, the lack of significant differences between Strandzha and the Eastern Rhodopes indicates a greater degree of ecological similarity between these regions. This pattern supports the hypothesis that regional environmental gradients play a key role in shaping microbial community composition, with certain locations acting as distinct ecological niches.
From an agronomic perspective, the identification of region-specific microbial taxa such as Bacillus supports the potential use of native microbiomes as sources of biofertilizers and biocontrol agents, while the distribution of Fusarium highlights potential phytosanitary risks associated with specific environments.

4.6. Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Agriculture

Wild legume populations represent valuable genetic and microbial resources. The observed microbial diversity associated with Pisum elatius, Cicer montbrettii, and Vicia incisa highlights the ecological importance of these species. Conservation of wild legume habitats is therefore essential for preserving both plant genetic diversity and beneficial microbial communities. Integrating ecological, floristic, and metagenomic approaches provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating crop wild relatives. Such approaches are increasingly recommended for biodiversity conservation and sustainable agricultural applications [13,25].
The results demonstrate that wild legume habitats harbor diverse and functionally relevant microbial communities with potential applications in sustainable agriculture. These microbiomes may serve as sources of beneficial microorganisms for the development of biofertilizers, biostimulants, and biological control agents. Incorporating such microbiomes into agricultural systems may improve nutrient use efficiency, enhance plant resilience to abiotic stress, and reduce dependence on chemical inputs. Despite the robustness of the applied analytical framework, certain limitations should be acknowledged. The study focuses primarily on taxonomic composition, and further research integrating functional metagenomics or transcriptomics would provide deeper insights into microbial activity and ecosystem functioning. Additionally, expanding the number of sampling sites and environmental parameters would help to better resolve the drivers of microbial community variation.
Future studies should also explore the functional roles of key taxa identified in this work, particularly in relation to plant health, nutrient cycling, and stress tolerance, to fully harness their potential in sustainable agricultural systems.

4.7. Limitations and Future Perspectives

Although the present study provides valuable insights into the structure and diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities, certain limitations should be acknowledged. The analysis was conducted at the regional level, and therefore the results primarily reflect overall patterns of community differentiation rather than within-region variability.
Future studies should include a larger number of sampling sites and replicate samples to better capture spatial variability and improve statistical resolution. Additionally, integration of functional metagenomics, transcriptomics, or metabolomics approaches would provide deeper insights into microbial activity and ecological functions. Research should also focus on the isolation and characterization of key microbial taxa identified in this study to evaluate their potential applications in agriculture, particularly in relation to plant growth promotion, stress tolerance, and disease suppression.

5. Conclusions

This study provides a comparative ecological and metagenomic characterisation of wild legume habitats in three ecologically distinct regions of Bulgaria—Kaliakra, Strandzha, and the Eastern Rhodopes. The results demonstrate that environmental gradients influence microbial community composition while maintaining similar functional potential. Carbon cycling processes dominated microbial activity across regions, whereas nitrogen cycling contributed to nutrient availability. Despite taxonomic differences, functional redundancy supported ecosystem stability and resilience. These findings highlight the ecological importance of wild legume habitats and their associated microbiomes. The integration of ecological and metagenomic data provides valuable insights for biodiversity conservation, crop improvement, and sustainable agricultural development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy16090910/s1, Supplementary Table S1. Summary statistics of sequencing data quality and read processing across all samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and M.S.; methodology, M.P. and N.T.; software, M.P.; validation, M.P., N.T., and M.S.; formal analysis, M.P.; investigation, M.P., N.T., and M.S.; resources, N.T. and M.S.; data curation, M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.P., N.T., and M.S.; visualization, M.P.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research presented in this article was financially supported by the Research Center for Scientific Research, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Protection at the Agricultural University—Plovdiv under Project No. 07-21.

Data Availability Statement

Sequencing data generated in this study are available in the NCBI BioProject database under BioProject ID PRJNA1444713 (Submission ID: SUB16088483, 29 March 2026). BioSample accession numbers range from SAMN56762333 to SAMN56762350 and correspond to soil metagenome samples from all experimental treatments.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the experts of Strandzha Nature Park for their valuable assistance and support during field investigations. The authors acknowledge the use of generative artificial intelligence (ChatGPT, version GPT-5.3, OpenAI, USA) for language editing and manuscript improvement. The authors reviewed and validated all content generated with AI assistance and take full responsibility for the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maxted, N.; Kell, S.P. Establishment of a Global Network for the In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs; FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Warschefsky, E.; Penmetsa, R.V.; Cook, D.R.; von Wettberg, E.J.B. Back to the wilds: Tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 1791–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peoples, M.B.; Brockwell, J.; Herridge, D.F.; Rochester, I.J.; Alves, B.J.R.; Urquiaga, S.; Boddey, R.M.; Dakora, F.D.; Bhattarai, S.; Maskey, S.L.; et al. The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis 2009, 48, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sprent, J.I.; Ardley, J.; James, E.K. Biogeography of nodulated legumes and their nitrogen-fixing symbionts. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 40–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mendes, R.; Garbeva, P.; Raaijmakers, J.M. The rhizosphere microbiome: Significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 634–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: Disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Oliverio, A.M.; Brewer, T.E.; Benavent-González, A.; Eldridge, D.J.; Bardgett, R.D.; Maestre, F.T.; Singh, B.K.; Fierer, N. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 2018, 359, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petrova, A.; Vladimirov, V. Balkan endemics in the Bulgarian flora. Phytol. Balc. 2009, 16, 293–311. [Google Scholar]
  10. Assyov, B.; Petrova, A.; Dimitrov, D.; Vassilev, R. Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora. Phytol. Balc. 2012, 18, 1–458. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maxted, N.; Ambrose, M. Peas (Pisum L.). In Plant Genetic Resources of Legumes in the Mediterranean; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ladizinsky, G.; Abbo, S. The Search for Wild Relatives of Cool Season Legumes; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Smýkal, P.; Coyne, C.J.; Ambrose, M.J.; Maxted, N.; Schaefer, H.; Blair, M.W.; Greene, S.L.; Nelson, M.N.; Besharat, N.; Vymyslický, T.; et al. Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for Science and Breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2015, 34, 43–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Petkova, M.; Sabeva, M.; Petrova, S.; Tahsin, N. The bacterial community structure of rhizosphere soil associated with Cicer montbretii Jaub. & Spach endemic to Strandzha Mountain. Ecol. Balk. 2023, 15, 34–48. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bakır, M.; Sari, D.; Sari, H.; Atif, R.M. Chickpea wild relatives: Potential hidden source for the development of climate resilient chickpea varieties. In Wild Germplasm for Genetic Improvement in Crop Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mikić, A.; Ćupina, B.; Zlatković, B.; Smýkal, P.; Antanasović, S.; Đorđević, V.; Medović, A.; Krstić, D.; Mihajlović, V. Collecting, characterisation and evaluation of tall pea (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius). Legume Perspect. 2014, 5, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  17. Foose, R.M.; Manheim, F.T. Geology of Bulgaria: A review. AAPG Bull. 1975, 59, 681–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Semerdjieva, I.B.; Yankova-Tsvetkova, E.; Cantrell, C.L.; Kačániová, M.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Phytochemical and reproductive capacity of Achillea thracica. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 232, 121187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Trifonov, V.; Gecheva, G.; Genova, B.; Dimov, P.; Vladimirov, V.; Vassilev, K. Contribution to the knowledge of the flora and habitats of “Chernata Skala” Protected Site, Eastern Rhodope Mountains, Bulgaria. Ecol. Balk. 2025, 17, 238–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. QIIME 2: Reproducible microbiome analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Davis, P.H. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  23. Greuter, W.; Burdet, H.M.; Long, G. Med-Checklist; Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques: Geneva, Switzerland, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  24. Polhill, R. Advances in Legume Systematics; Royal Botanic Gardens: London, UK, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bridson, D.; Forman, L. The Herbarium Handbook; Royal Botanic Gardens: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. Berg, G.; Smalla, K. Plant species and soil type shape microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 68, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vandenkoornhuyse, P.; Quaiser, A.; Duhamel, M.; Le Van, A.; Dufresne, A. The importance of the plant microbiome. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 1196–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dequiedt, S.; Saby, N.P.A.; Lelievre, M.; Jolivet, C.; Thioulouse, J.; Toutain, B.; Arrouays, D.; Bispo, A.; Lemanceau, P.; Ranjard, L. Biogeographical patterns of soil bacterial communities. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ISO 10390; Soil Quality—Determination of pH. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.
  30. Jones, J.B., Jr. Laboratory Guide for Conducting Soil Tests and Plant Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rhoades, J.D. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3—Chemical Methods; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 417–435. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lauber, C.L.; Hamady, M.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Soil pH as predictor of bacterial structure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5111–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rousk, J.; Brookes, P.C.; Bååth, E. Fungal and bacterial growth in soil. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hermans, S.M.; Buckley, H.L.; Case, B.S.; Curran-Cournane, F.; Taylor, M.; Lear, G. Bacteria as indicators of soil condition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 83, e02826-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lane, D.J. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  36. Frank, J.A.; Reich, C.I.; Sharma, S.; Weisbaum, J.S.; Wilson, B.A.; Olsen, G.J. Evaluation of 16S primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Fungal rRNA sequencing. In PCR Protocols; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers. Mol. Ecol. 1993, 2, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schoch, C.L.; Seifert, K.A.; Huhndorf, S.; Robert, V.; Spouge, J.L.; Levesque, C.A.; Chen, W.; Fungal Barcoding Consortium; Fungal Barcoding Consortium Author List; Bolchacova, E.; et al. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 6241–6246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kozich, J.J.; Westcott, S.L.; Baxter, N.T.; Highlander, S.K.; Schloss, P.D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Rohland, N.; Reich, D. DNA sequencing libraries. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 939–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Illumina. 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation Guide; Illumina Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  43. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nilsson, R.H.; KarLarsson, H.; Taylor, A.F.S.; Bengtsson-Palme, J.; Jeppesen, T.S.; Schigel, D.; Kennedy, P.; Picard, K.; Glöckner, F.O.; Tedersoo, L.; et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: Handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D259–D264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chao, A. Non-Parametric Estimation of the Number of Classes in a Population. Scand. J. Stat. 1984, 11, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shannon, C.E.; Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bray, J.R.; Curtis, J.T. Ordination of forest communities. Ecol. Monogr. 1957, 27, 325–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  51. Gower, J.C. Distance properties in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 1966, 53, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Anderson, M.J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001, 26, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Brígido, C.; Menéndez, E.; Paço, A.; Glick, B.R.; Belo, A.; Félix, M.R.; Oliveira, S.; Carvalho, M. Mediterranean Native Leguminous Plants: A Reservoir of Endophytic Bacteria with Potential to Enhance Chickpea Growth under Stress Conditions. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Allison, S.D.; Martiny, J.B.H. Resistance and resilience in microbial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11512–11519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of conducted field expeditions in Bulgaria showing sampling locations for plant material and soil samples for metagenomic analysis. The studied regions, outlined with green lines, include the Eastern Rhodope Mountains, Strandzha Mountain, and Kaliakra region. Sampling sites correspond to populations of Pisum elatius (red stars), Cicer montbrettii and Vicia incisa (blue circles), and species within the Lupinus genus (yellow diamonds).
Figure 1. Map of conducted field expeditions in Bulgaria showing sampling locations for plant material and soil samples for metagenomic analysis. The studied regions, outlined with green lines, include the Eastern Rhodope Mountains, Strandzha Mountain, and Kaliakra region. Sampling sites correspond to populations of Pisum elatius (red stars), Cicer montbrettii and Vicia incisa (blue circles), and species within the Lupinus genus (yellow diamonds).
Agronomy 16 00910 g001
Figure 2. Natural habitats and herbarium specimen of Pisum elatius M. Bieb. in Northeastern Bulgaria: (A) Cape Kaliakra coastal limestone habitat; (B) Yailata steppe locality; (C) herbarium specimen collected from natural populations.
Figure 2. Natural habitats and herbarium specimen of Pisum elatius M. Bieb. in Northeastern Bulgaria: (A) Cape Kaliakra coastal limestone habitat; (B) Yailata steppe locality; (C) herbarium specimen collected from natural populations.
Agronomy 16 00910 g002
Figure 3. Natural habitats of wild legume species in Bulgaria: (A) Madzharovo locality—Pisum elatius, (B) herbarium specimen collected from natural populations, (C) The population of Vicia incisa was identified in the Eastern Rhodopes region, primarily in the Madzharovo area, and (D) herbarium specimen.
Figure 3. Natural habitats of wild legume species in Bulgaria: (A) Madzharovo locality—Pisum elatius, (B) herbarium specimen collected from natural populations, (C) The population of Vicia incisa was identified in the Eastern Rhodopes region, primarily in the Madzharovo area, and (D) herbarium specimen.
Agronomy 16 00910 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundance of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) genera in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes.
Figure 4. Relative abundance of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) genera in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes.
Agronomy 16 00910 g004
Figure 5. Heat map showing the relative abundance of dominant bacterial (A) and fungal (B) taxa in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes, illustrating regional differences in microbial community composition.
Figure 5. Heat map showing the relative abundance of dominant bacterial (A) and fungal (B) taxa in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes, illustrating regional differences in microbial community composition.
Agronomy 16 00910 g005
Figure 6. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) community composition in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. The first two principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2) explain the largest proportion of variation in microbial community structure, illustrating regional clustering and differences in beta diversity among habitats.
Figure 6. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) community composition in rhizosphere soils from Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. The first two principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2) explain the largest proportion of variation in microbial community structure, illustrating regional clustering and differences in beta diversity among habitats.
Agronomy 16 00910 g006aAgronomy 16 00910 g006b
Figure 7. Visualization of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity among microbial communities from Strandzha, Kaliakra, and the Eastern Rhodopes. Boxplots represent the distribution of pairwise dissimilarity values within and between regions. Lower dissimilarity values within regions indicate higher similarity of microbial communities, whereas higher values between regions reflect stronger compositional differences. These patterns are consistent with PERMANOVA results, which revealed statistically significant differences in microbial community composition among regions (p < 0.05).
Figure 7. Visualization of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity among microbial communities from Strandzha, Kaliakra, and the Eastern Rhodopes. Boxplots represent the distribution of pairwise dissimilarity values within and between regions. Lower dissimilarity values within regions indicate higher similarity of microbial communities, whereas higher values between regions reflect stronger compositional differences. These patterns are consistent with PERMANOVA results, which revealed statistically significant differences in microbial community composition among regions (p < 0.05).
Agronomy 16 00910 g007
Figure 8. Functional composition of microbial communities in rhizosphere soils across regions. (A) Predicted bacterial functional groups based on metabolic pathways; (B) Fungal ecological guild distribution based on functional annotation in Strandzha, Kaliakra, and Eastern Rhodopes soils.
Figure 8. Functional composition of microbial communities in rhizosphere soils across regions. (A) Predicted bacterial functional groups based on metabolic pathways; (B) Fungal ecological guild distribution based on functional annotation in Strandzha, Kaliakra, and Eastern Rhodopes soils.
Agronomy 16 00910 g008
Table 1. Soil pH and electrical conductivity of the sampled soils.
Table 1. Soil pH and electrical conductivity of the sampled soils.
SiteLocationSoil TypepHReactionElectrical Conductivity (μS cm−1)Salinity Level
KaliakraCape KaliakraShallow calcareous Rendzic Leptosols (Rendzina soils) on limestone7.7Moderately alkaline41Very low
StrandzhaGolemiya Pazvlak (Strandzha Mountain)Chromic Luvisols/Cambisols (cinnamon forest soils)7.5Slightly alkaline to neutral77Very low
MadzharovoEastern Rhodopes (Madzharovo)Skeletic Cambisols/Leptosols on volcanic substrates6.6Neutral90Very low
Table 2. Alpha diversity metrics of bacterial and fungal communities in rhizosphere soils from the Strandzha, Kaliakra, and Eastern Rhodopes regions. Richness estimators (Chao1 and observed features), diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson), evenness (Pielou), dominance, and sequencing coverage are presented.
Table 2. Alpha diversity metrics of bacterial and fungal communities in rhizosphere soils from the Strandzha, Kaliakra, and Eastern Rhodopes regions. Richness estimators (Chao1 and observed features), diversity indices (Shannon and Simpson), evenness (Pielou), dominance, and sequencing coverage are presented.
Bacterial Alpha Diversity
RegionChao1Observed FeaturesShannonSimpsonPielou EvennessDominanceGood’s Coverage
Strandzha3828.41538069.4580.9930.7950.0070.999
Kaliakra5190.390513910.0000.9880.8110.0120.999
Eastern Rhodopes4726.67046909.9540.9950.8160.0050.999
Fungal Alpha Diversity
RegionChao1Observed FeaturesShannonSimpsonPielou EvennessDominanceGood’s Coverage
Strandzha1422.57614096.0510.9390.5780.0611.000
Kaliakra2049.03820126.4490.9340.5880.0660.999
Eastern Rhodopes1887.18818546.4360.9580.5930.0420.999
Table 3. Kruskal–Wallis test for differences in taxa abundance across regions.
Table 3. Kruskal–Wallis test for differences in taxa abundance across regions.
TaxonTest Statistic (H)p-ValueSignificant
Bacillus6.450.039Yes
Fusarium8.120.017Yes
Table 4. Pairwise comparisons of taxa abundance among regions using Dunn’s post hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction.
Table 4. Pairwise comparisons of taxa abundance among regions using Dunn’s post hoc test with Benjamini–Hochberg correction.
ComparisonZ-Valuep-ValueAdjusted p-Value (BH)Significant
Strandzha vs. Kaliakra2.310.0210.042Yes
Strandzha vs. Rhodopi1.450.1460.219No
Kaliakra vs. Rhodopi2.780.0050.015Yes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petkova, M.; Tahsin, N.; Sabeva, M. Comparative Ecological and Metagenomic Characterisation of Wild Legume Habitats in Bulgaria: Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes. Agronomy 2026, 16, 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16090910

AMA Style

Petkova M, Tahsin N, Sabeva M. Comparative Ecological and Metagenomic Characterisation of Wild Legume Habitats in Bulgaria: Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes. Agronomy. 2026; 16(9):910. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16090910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petkova, Mariana, Nurettin Tahsin, and Mariya Sabeva. 2026. "Comparative Ecological and Metagenomic Characterisation of Wild Legume Habitats in Bulgaria: Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes" Agronomy 16, no. 9: 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16090910

APA Style

Petkova, M., Tahsin, N., & Sabeva, M. (2026). Comparative Ecological and Metagenomic Characterisation of Wild Legume Habitats in Bulgaria: Kaliakra, Strandzha, and Eastern Rhodopes. Agronomy, 16(9), 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16090910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop