Use of Digital Technologies into Agroforestry Systems: A Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Use of Digital Technologies in Agroforestry
2.1. Monitoring Agroecosystem Functionality in Agroforestry Systems
2.2. Monitoring Livestock in Agroforestry Systems
2.3. Plant Monitoring in Agroforestry Systems
2.4. Soil Monitoring in Agroforestry Systems
3. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT Analysis) on the Use of Digital Technologies in Agroforestry Systems
3.1. Strenghts
3.2. Weaknesses
3.3. Opportunities
3.4. Threats
4. Conclusions and Perspectives
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Burgess, P.J.; Rosati, A. Advances in European agroforestry: Results from the AGFORWARD project. Agroforest. Syst. 2018, 92, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, M.H.; Lovell, S.T. Agroforestry—The Next Step in Sustainable and Resilient Agriculture. Sustainability 2016, 8, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrett, H.E.; Wolz, K.J.; Walter, W.D.; Godsey, L.D.; McGraw, R.L. Alley Cropping Practices. In North American Agroforestry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Bognor Regis, UK, 2021; pp. 163–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terasaki Hart, D.E.; Yeo, S.; Almaraz, M.; Beillouin, D.; Cardinael, R.; Garcia, E.; Kay, S.; Lovell, S.T.; Rosenstock, T.S.; Sprenkle-Hyppolite, S.; et al. Priority science can accelerate agroforestry as a natural climate solution. Nat. Clim. Change 2023, 13, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Broom, D.M.; Galindo, F.A.; Murgueitio, E. Sustainable, Efficient Livestock Production with High Biodiversity and Good Welfare for Animals. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 280, 20132025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jose, S. Agroforestry for Ecosystem Services and Environmental Benefits: An Overview. Agroforest. Syst. 2009, 76, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, P.K.R. Carbon Sequestration Studies in Agroforestry Systems: A Reality-Check. Agroforest. Syst. 2012, 86, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayala, J.; Prieto, I. Water acquisition, sharing and redistribution by roots: Applications to agroforestry systems. Plant Soil 2020, 453, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udawatta, R.; Rankoth, L.; Jose, S. Agroforestry and Biodiversity. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udawatta, R.P.; Anderson, S.H.; Motavalli, P.P.; Garrett, H.E. Calibration of a water content reflectometer and soil water dynamics for an agroforestry practice. Agroforest. Syst. 2021, 82, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quandt, A.; Neufeldt, H.; McCabe, J.T. The Role of Agroforestry in Building Livelihood Resilience to Floods and Drought in Semiarid Kenya. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thorlakson, T.; Neufeldt, H. Reducing Subsistence Farmers’ Vulnerability to Climate Change: Evaluating the Potential Contributions of Agroforestry in Western Kenya. Agric. Food Secur. 2012, 1, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Current, D.; Lutz, E.; Scherr, S.J. The Cost and Benefits of Agroforestry to Farmers. World Bank Res. Obs. 1995, 10, 151–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plieninger, T.; Muñoz-Rojas, J.; Buck, L.E.; Scherr, S.J. Agroforestry for Sustainable Landscape Management. Sustain. Sci. 2020, 15, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranchina, M.; Burgess, P.; Cella, F.G.; Cumplido-Marin, L.; Gosme, M.; den Herder, M.; Kay, S.; Lawson, G.; Lojka, B.; Palma, J.; et al. Exploring Agroforestry Limiting Factors and Digitalization Perspectives: Insights from a European Multi-Actor Appraisal. Agroforest. Syst. 2024, 98, 2499–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdivia, C.; Barbieri, C.; Gold, M.A. Between Forestry and Farming: Policy and Environmental Implications of the Barriers to Agroforestry Adoption. Can. J. Agr. Econ. 2012, 60, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dissanayaka, D.M.N.S.; Dissanayake, D.K.R.P.L.; Udumann, S.S.; Nuwarapaksha, T.D.; Atapattu, A.J. Agroforestry—A Key Tool in the Climate-Smart Agriculture Context: A Review on Coconut Cultivation in Sri Lanka. Front. Agron. 2023, 5, 1162750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fahad, S.; Chavan, S.B.; Chichaghare, A.R.; Uthappa, A.R.; Kumar, M.; Kakade, V.; Pradhan, A.; Jinger, D.; Rawale, G.; Yadav, D.K.; et al. Agroforestry Systems for Soil Health Improvement and Maintenance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, B.; Morais, M.C.; Pereira, S.; Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Santos, M. Tree–Crop Ecological and Physiological Interactions Within Climate Change Contexts: A Mini-Review. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 9, 661978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giri, V.; Bhoi, T.K.; Samal, I.; Komal, J.; Majhi, P.K. Exploring the Agroforestry Systems for Ecosystem Services: A Synthesis of Current Knowledge and Future Research Directions. In Agroforestry to Combat Global Challenges: Current Prospects and Future Challenges; Jatav, H.S., Rajput, V.D., Minkina, T., Van Hullebusch, E.D., Dutta, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 503–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konfo, T.R.C.; Chabi, A.B.P.; Amoussouga Gero, A.; Lagnika, C.; Avlessi, F.; Biaou, G.; Sohounhloue, C.K.D. Recent Climate-Smart Innovations in Agrifood to Enhance Producer Incomes through Sustainable Solutions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2024, 15, 100985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martos, V.; Ahmad, A.; Cartujo, P.; Ordoñez, J. Ensuring agricultural sustainability through remote sensing in the era of agriculture 5.0. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, K.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Pai, P.; Varshney, A.; Juikar, S.; Prasad, V.; Bhadra, B.; Dasgupta, S. Viable Smart Sensors and Their Application in Data Driven Agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 198, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Carvalho, A.F.; Fernandes-Filho, E.I.; Daher, M.; Gomes, L.d.C.; Cardoso, I.M.; Fernandes, R.B.A.; Schaefer, C.E.G.R. Microclimate and Soil and Water Loss in Shaded and Unshaded Agroforestry Coffee Systems. Agroforest. Syst. 2021, 95, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.; Wei, Q.; Zhu, Y. Emerging Wearable Sensors for Plant Health Monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahlein, A.K. Plant Disease Detection by Imaging Sensors—Parallels and Specific Demands for Precision Agriculture and Plant Phenotyping. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, R.C.d.; Silva, R.D.d.S.e. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Benefits, Challenges, and Trends. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, D.K.; Mishra, R. Towards Sustainable Agriculture: Harnessing AI for Global Food Security. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2024, 12, 72–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.; Liew, A.X.W.; Venturini, F.; Kalogeras, A.; Candiani, A.; Di Benedetto, G.; Ajibola, S.; Cartujo, P.; Romero, P.; Lykoudi, A.; et al. AI Can Empower Agriculture for Global Food Security: Challenges and Prospects in Developing Nations. Front. Artif. Intell. 2024, 7, 1328530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Alahmad, T.; Neményi, M.; Nyéki, A. Applying IoT Sensors and Big Data to Improve Precision Crop Production: A Review. Agron 2023, 13, 2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.; Saba, T.; Kashif, M.; Fati, S.M.; Bahaj, S.A.; Chaudhry, H. A Revisit of Internet of Things Technologies for Monitoring and Control Strategies in Smart Agriculture. Agronomy 2022, 12, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calzone, A.; Cotrozzi, L.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C.; Pellegrini, E. Hyperspectral detection and monitoring of salt stress in pomegranate cultivars. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotrozzi, L. Spectroscopic Detection of Forest Diseases: A Review (1970–2020). J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carli, M.; Pedrelli, A.; Pippi, L.; Risoli, S.; Panattoni, A.; Lorenzini, G.; Pellegrini, E.; Nali, C.; Cotrozzi, L. Using leaf hyperspectral data to early detect flavescence dorée before the onset of symptoms in a heavily affected vineyard of Tuscany (Central Italy). Plant Dis. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Liu, W.; Chen, J.; Bruijnzeel, L.A.; Mao, Z.; Yang, X.; Cardinael, R.; Meng, F.-R.; Sidle, R.C.; Seitz, S.; et al. Reductions in Water, Soil and Nutrient Losses and Pesticide Pollution in Agroforestry Practices: A Review of Evidence and Processes. Plant Soil 2020, 453, 45–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tranchina, M.; Reubens, B.; Frey, M.; Mele, M.; Mantino, A. What Challenges Impede the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices? A Global Perspective through a Systematic Literature Review. Agroforest. Syst. 2024, 98, 1817–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroux, L.; Clermont-Dauphin, C.; Ndienor, M.; Jourdan, C.; Roupsard, O.; Seghieri, J. A spatialized assessment of ecosystem service relationships in a multifunctional agroforestry landscape of Senegal. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 853, 158707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ndao, B.; Leroux, L.; Gaetano, R.; Diouf, A.A.; Soti, V.; Bégué, A.; Sambou, B. Landscape heterogeneity analysis using geospatial techniques and a priori knowledge in Sahelian agroforestry systems of Senegal. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aragón, S.; Salinas, N.; Nina-Quispe, A.; Qquellon, V.H.; Paucar, G.R.; Huaman, W.; Roman-Cuesta, R.M. Aboveground biomass in secondary montane forests in Peru: Slow carbon recovery in agroforestry legacies. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 28, e01696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashiagbor, G.; Forkuo, E.K.; Asante, W.A.; Acheampong, E.; Quaye-Ballard, J.A.; Boamah, P.; Foli, E. Pixel-based and object-oriented approaches in segregating cocoa from forest in the Juabeso-Bia landscape of Ghana. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2020, 19, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearney, S.P.; Coops, N.C.; Chan, K.M.; Fonte, S.J.; Siles, P.; Smukler, S.M. Predicting carbon benefits from climate-smart agriculture: High-resolution carbon mapping and uncertainty assessment in El Salvador. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 202, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.K.; Rai, A.; Rai, S.C. Land use and land cover change detection using geospatial techniques in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 2020, 23, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weissteiner, C.J.; García-Feced, C.; Paracchini, M.L. A new view on EU agricultural landscapes: Quantifying patchiness to assess farmland heterogeneity. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 61, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, S.L.; Pires, C.V.; Marcatti, G.E.; Santos, R.H.; Imbuzeiro, H.M.; Fernandes, R.B. Intercropping of coffee with the palm tree, macauba, can mitigate climate change effects. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 256, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Junior, N.K.; Miyagi, E.S.; de Oliveira, C.C.; Barreto, C.D.; Mastelaro, A.P.; Bungenstab, D.J.; Alves, F.V. Infrared thermography for microclimate assessment in agroforestry systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 731, 139252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Ma, C.; Lu, W.; Wan, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, W. Microclimate, crop quality, productivity, and revenue in two types of agroforestry systems in drylands of Xinjiang, northwest China. Eur. J. Agron. 2021, 124, 126245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svoma, B.M.; Fox, N.I.; Pallardy, Q.; Udawatta, R.P. Evapotranspiration differences between agroforestry and grass buffer systems. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 176, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Jia, G.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Li, Z. Comparative study of seasonal freeze–thaw on soil water transport in farmland and its shelterbelt. Catena 2023, 225, 106982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmiento-Soler, A.; Vaast, P.; Hoffmann, M.P.; Rötter, R.P.; Jassogne, L.; Van Asten, P.J.; Graefe, S. Water use of Coffea arabica in open versus shaded systems under smallholder’s farm conditions in Eastern Uganda. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 266, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baah-Acheamfour, M.; Carlyle, C.N.; Lim, S.S.; Bork, E.W.; Chang, S.X. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 571, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pecchioni, G.; Bosco, S.; Volpi, I.; Mantino, A.; Dragoni, F.; Giannini, V.; Tozzini, C.; Mele, M.; Ragaglini, G. Carbon Budget of an Agroforestry System after Being Converted from a Poplar Short Rotation Coppice. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villani, L.; Castelli, G.; Sambalino, F.; Oliveira, L.A.A.; Bresci, E. Influence of trees on landscape temperature in semi-arid agro-ecosystems of East Africa. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 212, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfonso-Torreño, A.; Schnabel, S.; Gómez-Gutiérrez, Á.; Crema, S.; Cavalli, M. Effects of gully control measures on sediment yield and connectivity in wooded rangelands. Catena 2022, 214, 106259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campbell, D.L.M.; Lea, J.M.; Keshavarzi, H.; Lee, C. Virtual fencing is comparable to electric tape fencing for cattle behavior and welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Colusso, P.I.; Clark, C.E.F.; Ingram, L.J.; Thomson, P.C.; Lomax, S. Dairy Cattle Response to a Virtual Fence When Pasture on Offer Is Restricted to the Post-Grazing Residual. Front. Anim. Sci. 2021, 2, 791228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Feng, M.; Song, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Guo, J. Tree Shade Improves Milking Performance, Apparent Digestibility, Antioxidant Capacity, and Immunity of Dairy Cows in Open Sheds. Animals 2025, 15, 1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mufford, J.T. Use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles to Study Cattle Heat Stress. Doctoral Dissertation, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC, Canada, 2020. Available online: https://tru.arcabc.ca/node/2289 (accessed on 31 July 2025).
- Martínez-Avilés, M.; Fernández-Carrión, E.; López García-Baones, J.M.; Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J.M. Early Detection of Infection in Pigs through an Online Monitoring System. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2017, 64, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aquilani, C.; Confessore, A.; Bozzi, R.; Sirtori, F.; Pugliese, C. Review: Precision Livestock Farming Technologies in Pasture-Based Livestock Systems. Animal 2022, 16, 100429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pezzopane, J.R.M.; Bosi, C.; de Campos Bernardi, A.C.; Muller, M.D.; de Oliveira, P.P.A. Managing eucalyptus trees in agroforestry systems: Productivity parameters and PAR transmittance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 312, 107350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosi, C.; Huth, N.I.; Sentelhas, P.C.; Pezzopane, J.R.M. APSIM model performance in simulating Piatã palisade grass growth and soil water in different positions of a silvopastoral system with eucalyptus. Agric. Syst. 2022, 195, 103302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieruschka, R.; Schurr, U. Plant Phenotyping: Past, Present, and Future. Plant Phenomics 2019, 2019, 7507131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magalhães, C.A.; Zolin, C.A.; Lulu, J.; Lopes, L.B.; Furtini, I.V.; Vendrusculo, L.G.; Pezzopane, J.R.M. Improvement of thermal comfort indices in agroforestry systems in the southern Brazilian Amazon. J. Therm. Biol. 2020, 91, 102636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wengert, M.; Piepho, H.P.; Astor, T.; Graß, R.; Wachendorf, M.; Wijesingha, J. Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of yield, protein concentration, and leaf area index in grassland agroforestry systems can be modeled from UAV-borne imagery. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 237, 110575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arenas-Corraliza, M.G.; López-Díaz, M.L.; Rolo, V.; Cáceres, Y.; Moreno, G. Phenological, morphological and physiological drivers of cereal grain yield in Mediterranean agroforestry systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 340, 108158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruso, G.; Palai, G.; Tozzini, L.; Gucci, R. Using Visible and Thermal Images by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Monitor the Plant Water Status, Canopy Growth and Yield of Olive Trees (cvs. Frantoio and Leccino) under Different Irrigation Regimes. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Messina, G.; Modica, G. Applications of UAV thermal imagery in precision agriculture: State of the art and future research outlook. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neupane, K.; Baysal-Gurel, F. Automatic identification and monitoring of plant diseases using unmanned aerial vehicles: A review. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarco-Tejada, P.J.; González-Dugo, V.; Berni, J.A. Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 117, 322–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.; Wang, X. Semantic segmentation of fruits on multi-sensor fused data in natural orchards. Comput. Electr. Agric. 2023, 204, 107569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, H.; Xu, E.; Zhang, J.; Meng, Y.; Wei, J.; Dong, Z.; Li, Z. BushNet: Effective semantic segmentation of bush in large-scale point clouds. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 193, 106653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arriola-Valverde, S.; Rimolo-Donadio, R.; Villagra-Mendoza, K.; Chacón-Rodriguez, A.; García-Ramirez, R.; Somarriba-Chavez, E. A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Frameworks Applied to Coffee Plant Detection from Close-Range UAS-RGB Imagery in Costa Rica. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ripamonti, A.; Mantino, A.; Annecchini, F.; Cappucci, A.; Casarosa, L.; Turini, L.; Foggi, G.; Mele, M. Outcomes of a comparison between pastoral and silvopastoral management on beef cattle productivity, animal welfare and pasture depletion in a Mediterranean extensive farm. Agroforest. Syst. 2023, 97, 1071–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roupsard, O.; Audebert, A.; Ndour, A.P.; Clermont-Dauphin, C.; Agbohessou, Y.; Sanou, J.; Leroux, L. How far does the tree affect the crop in agroforestry? New spatial analysis methods in a Faidherbia parkland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 296, 106928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flexas, J.; Briantais, J.M.; Cerovic, Z.; Medrano, H.; Moya, I. Steady-state and maximum chlorophyll fluorescence responses to water stress in grapevine leaves: A new remote sensing system. Remote Sens. Environ. 2000, 73, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urban, L.; Aarrouf, J.; Bidel, L.P. Assessing the effects of water deficit on photosynthesis using parameters derived from measurements of leaf gas exchange and of chlorophyll a fluorescence. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Gao, X.; An, Q.; Ren, X.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, L.; Zhao, X. A shift from isohydric to anisohydric water-use strategy as a result of increasing drought stress for young apple trees in a semiarid agroforestry system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 336, 109484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Gao, X.; He, N.; Zhao, X. Ecohydrological advantage of young apple tree-based agroforestry and its response to extreme droughts on the semiarid Loess Plateau. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 321, 108969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler, Y.; Grote, R.; Alongi, F.; Knüver, T.; Ruehr, N.K. Capturing drought stress signals: The potential of dendrometers for monitoring tree water status. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpae140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Y.; Qiao, J.; Feng, Y.; Wang, B.; Duan, W.; Zhou, H.; Yang, C. The optimal size of a Paulownia-crop agroforestry system for maximal economic return in North China Plain. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2019, 269, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lourenço, P.; Godinho, S.; Sousa, A.; Gonçalves, A.C. Estimating tree aboveground biomass using multispectral satellite-based data in Mediterranean agroforestry system using random forest algorithm. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 23, 100560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Shen, L.; Liu, T.; Wei, W.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; Zhang, W. Microclimate, yield, and income of a jujube–cotton agroforestry system in Xinjiang, China. Ind. Crop Prod. 2022, 182, 114941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassamo, C.T.; Draper, D.; Romeiras, M.M.; Marques, I.; Chiulele, R.; Rodrigues, M.; Ramalho, J.C. Impact of climate changes in the suitable areas for Coffea arabica L. production in Mozambique: Agroforestry as an alternative management system to strengthen crop sustainability. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 346, 108341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donfack, L.S.; Röll, A.; Ellsäßer, F.; Ehbrecht, M.; Irawan, B.; Hölscher, D.; Zemp, D.C. Microclimate and land surface temperature in a biodiversity enriched oil palm plantation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 497, 119480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagliardi, S.; Avelino, J.; Beilhe, L.B.; Isaac, M.E. Contribution of shade trees to wind dynamics and pathogen dispersal on the edge of coffee agroforestry systems: A functional traits approach. Crop Prot. 2020, 130, 105071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merle, I.; Tixier, P.; de Melo Virginio Filho, E.; Cilas, C.; Avelino, J. Forecast models of coffee leaf rust symptoms and signs based on identified microclimatic combinations in coffee-based agroforestry systems in Costa Rica. Crop Prot. 2020, 130, 105046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.J.; Huang, Y.Y.; Li, Y.S.; Chang, C.Y.; Huang, Y.M. An AIoT based smart agricultural system for pests detection. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 180750–180761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; He, J.; Yang, S.; Fu, H.; Li, T.; Song, H.; He, D. Fusion of machine vision technology and AlexNet-CNNs deep learning network for the detection of postharvest apple pesticide residues. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2019, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dupont, S.; Irvine, M.R.; Motisi, N.; Allinne, C.; Avelino, J.; Beilhe, L.B. Wind-flow dynamics and spore-like particle dispersal over agroforestry systems: Impact of the tree density distribution. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 327, 109214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putra, B.T.W. A new low-cost sensing system for rapid ring estimation of woody plants to support tree management. Inf. Process. Agric. 2020, 7, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillot, E.; Bertrand, I.; Rumpel, C.; Gomez, C.; Arnal, D.; Abadie, J.; Hinsinger, P. Spatial heterogeneity of soil quality within a Mediterranean alley cropping agroforestry system: Comparison with a monocropping system. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2021, 105, 103330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.; Irmak, S.; Jhala, A.J.; Vuran, M.C.; Diotto, A. Time-domain and frequency-domain reflectometry type soil moisture sensor performance and soil temperature effects in fine-and coarse-textured soils. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2019, 35, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, N.A.; Wallace, J.C. Analysis of soil water dynamics in an agroforestry system based on detailed soil water records from time-domain reflectometry. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 1999, 3, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashyap, B.; Kumar, R. Sensing Methodologies in Agriculture for Soil Moisture and Nutrient Monitoring. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 14095–14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coussement, T.; Maloteau, S.; Pardon, P.; Artru, S.; Ridley, S.; Javaux, M.; Garré, S. A tree-bordered field as a surrogate for agroforestry in temperate regions: Where does the water go? Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 210, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padovan, M.D.P.; Brook, R.M.; Barrios, M.; Cruz-Castillo, J.B.; Vilchez-Mendoza, S.J.; Costa, A.N.; Rapidel, B. Water loss by transpiration and soil evaporation in coffee shaded by Tabebuia rosea Bertol. and Simarouba glauca dc. compared to unshaded coffee in sub-optimal environmental conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2022, 248, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coble, A.P.; Contosta, A.R.; Smith, R.G.; Siegert, N.W.; Vadeboncoeur, M.; Jennings, K.A.; Asbjornsen, H. Influence of forest-to-silvopasture conversion and drought on components of evapotranspiration. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 295, 106916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payero, J.O.; Mirzakhani-Nafchi, A.; Khalilian, A.; Qiao, X.; Davis, R. Development of a Low-Cost Internet-of-Things (IoT) System for Monitoring Soil Water Potential Using Watermark 200SS Sensors. Adv. Internet Things 2017, 7, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jefferies, D.A.; Heck, R.J.; Thevathasan, N.V.; Gordon, A.M. Characterizing soil surface structure in a temperate tree-based intercropping system using X-ray computed tomography. Agrofor. Syst. 2014, 88, 645–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mugunga, C.P.; Giller, K.E.; Mohren, G.M.J. Tree-crop interactions in maize-eucalypt woodlot systems in southern Rwanda. Eur. J. Agron. 2017, 86, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taugourdeau, S.; Le Maire, G.; Avelino, J.; Jones, J.R.; Ramirez, L.G.; Quesada, M.J.; Roupsard, O. Leaf area index as an indicator of ecosystem services and management practices: An application for coffee agroforestry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 192, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burton, L.; Jayachandran, K.; Bhansali, S. Review—The “Real-Time” Revolution for In Situ Soil Nutrient Sensing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lo Presti, D.; Di Tocco, J.; Massaroni, C.; Cimini, S.; De Gara, L.; Singh, S.; Raucci, A.; Manganiello, G.; Woo, S.L.; Schena, E.; et al. Current Understanding, Challenges and Perspective on Portable Systems Applied to Plant Monitoring and Precision Agriculture. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 222, 115005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pellikka, P.; Luotamo, M.; Sädekoski, N.; Hietanen, J.; Vuorinne, I.; Räsänen, M.; Klami, A. Tropical altitudinal gradient soil organic carbon and nitrogen estimation using Specim IQ portable imaging spectrometer. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 883, 163677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinoshita, R.; Roupsard, O.; Chevallier, T.; Albrecht, A.; Taugourdeau, S.; Ahmed, Z.; van Es, H.M. Large topsoil organic carbon variability is controlled by Andisol properties and effectively assessed by VNIR spectroscopy in a coffee agroforestry system of Costa Rica. Geoderma 2016, 262, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oertel, C.; Matschullat, J.; Zurba, K.; Zimmermann, F.; Erasmi, S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Soils—A Review. Geochem 2016, 76, 327–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.; Mishra, A.K.; Bavorova, M. Agroforestry Adoption Decision in Green Growth Initiative Programs: Key Lessons from the Billion Trees Afforestation Project (BTAP). Environ. Manag. 2023, 71, 950–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, A.; Majumder, A.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Toor, A.S.; Mani, P.K.; Naresh, R.K.; Mitran, T. Impact of agricultural management practices on soil carbon sequestration and its monitoring through simulation models and remote sensing techniques: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 52, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franzluebbers, A.J.; Chappell, J.C.; Shi, W.; Cubbage, F.W. Greenhouse gas emissions in an agroforestry system of the southeastern USA. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2017, 108, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Callejas-Rodelas, J.A.; Knohl, A.; van Ramshorst, J.; Mammarella, I.; Markwit, C. Comparison between lower-cost and conventional eddy covariance setups for CO2 and evapotranspiration measurements above monocropping and agroforestry systems. Agric. For. Meteor. 2024, 354, 110086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenov, M.V.; Zhelezova, A.D.; Ksenofontova, N.A.; Ivanova, E.A.; Nikitin, D.A.; Semenov, V.M. Microbiological indicators for assessing the effects of agricultural practices on soil health: A review. Agronomy 2025, 15, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegwart, L.; Bertrand, I.; Roupsard, O.; Duthoit, M.; Jourdan, C. Root litter decomposition in a sub-Sahelian agroforestry parkland dominated by Faidherbia albida. J. Arid Environ. 2022, 198, 104696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, T.; Mikiciuk, G.; Durlik, I.; Mikiciuk, M.; Łobodzińska, A.; Śnieg, M. The IoT and AI in Agriculture: The Time Is Now—A Systematic Review of Smart Sensing Technologies. Sensors 2025, 25, 3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khanal, S.; Kc, K.; Fulton, J.P.; Shearer, S.; Ozkan, E. Remote Sensing in Agriculture—Accomplishments, Limitations, and Opportunities. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sishodia, R.P.; Ray, R.L.; Singh, S.K. Applications of Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture: A Review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castle, S.E.; Miller, D.C.; Ordonez, P.J.; Baylis, K.; Hughes, K. The Impacts of Agroforestry Interventions on Agricultural Productivity, Ecosystem Services, and Human Well-Being in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2021, 17, e1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabiani, S.; Vanino, S.; Napoli, R.; Zajíček, A.; Duffková, R.; Evangelou, E.; Nino, P. Assessment of the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Variable Rate Technology (VRT) Application in Different Wheat Intensive European Agricultural Areas. A Water Energy Food Nexus Approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 114, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, S.A.; Buttel, F.H. The Political Economy of Precision Farming. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1996, 78, 1269–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soussi, A.; Zero, E.; Sacile, R.; Trinchero, D.; Fossa, M. Smart Sensors and Smart Data for Precision Agriculture: A Review. Sensors 2024, 24, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- DeLonge, M.S.; Miles, A.; Carlisle, L. Investing in the Transition to Sustainable Agriculture. Environ. Sci. Policy 2016, 55, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Owombo, P.T.; Idumah, F.O. Determinants of Agroforestry Technology Adoption among Arable Crop Farmers in Ondo State, Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation. Agroforest. Syst. 2017, 91, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smidt, H.J.; Jokonya, O. Factors Affecting Digital Technology Adoption by Small-Scale Farmers in Agriculture Value Chains (AVCs) in South Africa. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2022, 28, 558–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri-Zarandi, M.; Dara, R.A.; Duncan, E.; Fraser, E.D.G. Big Data Privacy in Smart Farming: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekhar, M.; Rastogi, M.; Rajesh, C.M.; Saikanth, D.R.K.; Rout, S.; Kumar, S.; Patel, A.K. Exploring Traditional Agricultural Techniques Integrated with Modern Farming for a Sustainable Future: A Review. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2024, 30, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Xu, X.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, C.; Yi, R.; Luo, W. Comparing evapotranspiration characteristics and environmental controls for three agroforestry ecosystems in a subtropical humid karst area. J. Hydrol. 2018, 563, 1042–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leroux, L.; Falconnier, G.N.; Diouf, A.A.; Ndao, B.; Gbodjo, J.E.; Tall, L.; Roupsard, O. Using remote sensing to assess the effect of trees on millet yield in complex parklands of Central Senegal. Agric. Syst. 2020, 184, 102918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.; Ray, R.L.; Sargani, G.R.; Ihtisham, M.; Khayyam, M.; Ismail, S. Current Progress and Future Prospects of Agriculture Technology: Gateway to Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherr, S.J. Building Opportunities for Small-Farm Agroforestry to Supply Domestic Wood Markets in Developing Countries. Agroforest. Syst. 2004, 61, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.K.; Biradar, C.M.; Behera, M.D.; Prakash, A.J.; Das, P.; Mohanta, M.R.; Krishna, G.; Dogra, A.; Dhyani, S.K.; Rizvi, J. Optimising Carbon Fixation through Agroforestry: Estimation of Aboveground Biomass Using Multi-Sensor Data Synergy and Machine Learning. Ecol. Inform. 2024, 79, 102408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreotti, F.; Mao, Z.; Jagoret, P.; Speelman, E.N.; Gary, C.; Saj, S. Exploring Management Strategies to Enhance the Provision of Ecosystem Services in Complex Smallholder Agroforestry Systems. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 94, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, D.; Franzel, S. Trees of Prosperity: Agroforestry, Markets and the African Smallholder. Agroforest. Syst. 2004, 61, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassenrath, G.F.; Heilman, P.; Luschei, E.; Bennett, G.L.; Fitzgerald, G.; Klesius, P.; Tracy, W.; Williford, J.R.; Zimba, P.V. Technology, Complexity and Change in Agricultural Production Systems. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2008, 23, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merle, I.; Villarreyna-Acuña, R.; Ribeyre, F.; Roupsard, O.; Cilas, C.; Avelino, J. Microclimate estimation under different coffee-based agroforestry systems using full-sun weather data and shade tree characteristics. Eur. J. Agron. 2022, 132, 126396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abera, T.; Heiskanen, J.; Maeda, E.; Odongo, V.; Pellikka, P. Impacts of land cover and management change on top-of-canopy and below-canopy temperatures in Southeastern Kenya. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 874, 162560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castillo, M.S.; Tiezzi, F.; Franzluebbers, A.J. Tree species effects on understory forage productivity and microclimate in a silvopasture of the Southeastern USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 295, 106917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, C.; Yang, Z.; Liu, C.; Dong, X.; Wang, X.; Zhuang, C.; Zhao, L. Win-win-win pathway for ecological restoration by balancing hydrological, ecological, and agricultural dimensions: Contrasting lessons from highly eroded agroforestry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gessesse, B.; Tesfamariam, B.G.; Melgani, F. Understanding traditional agro-ecosystem dynamics in response to systematic transition processes and rainfall variability patterns at watershed-scale in Southern Ethiopia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2022, 327, 107832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lima, G.S.A.; Ferreira, M.E.; Madari, B.E.; de Melo Carvalho, M.T. Carbon estimation in an integrated crop-livestock system with imaging sensors aboard unmanned aerial platforms. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2022, 28, 100867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ketema, H.; Wei, W.; Legesse, A.; Wolde, Z.; Temesgen, H.; Yimer, F.; Mamo, A. Quantifying smallholder farmers’ managed land use/land cover dynamics and its drivers in contrasting agro-ecological zones of the East African Rift. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 21, e00898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashiagbor, G.; Asare-Ansah, A.O.; Amoah, E.B.; Asante, W.A.; Mensah, Y.A. Assessment of machine learning classifiers in mapping the cocoa-forest mosaic landscape of Ghana. Sci. Afr. 2023, 20, e01718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obunga, G.; Siljander, M.; Maghenda, M.; Pellikka, P.K.E. Habitat suitability modelling to improve conservation status of two critically endangered endemic Afromontane forest bird species in Taita Hills, Kenya. J. Nat. Conserv. 2022, 65, 126111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forkuor, G.; Zoungrana, J.B.B.; Dimobe, K.; Ouattara, B.; Vadrevu, K.P.; Tondoh, J.E. Above-ground biomass mapping in West African dryland forest using Sentinel-1 and 2 datasets-A case study. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 236, 111496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulina, A.; Rolo, V.; Hernández-Esteban, A.; Seddaiu, G.; Roggero, P.P.; Moreno, G. Long-term legacy of sowing legume-rich mixtures in Mediterranean wooded grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2023, 348, 108397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheswa, E.Z.; Ramesh, T.; Kalle, R.; Downs, C.T. Habitat use by honey badgers and the influence of predators in iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa. Mamm. Biol. 2018, 90, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pezzopane, J.R.M.; de Campos Bernardi, A.C.; Bosi, C.; Crippa, P.H.; Santos, P.M.; Nardachione, E.C. Assessment of Piatã palisadegrass forage mass in integrated livestock production systems using a proximal canopy reflectance sensor. Eur. J. Agron. 2019, 103, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Han, S.; van der Werf, W.; Evers, J.B.; Anten, N.P. Spatial configuration drives complementary capture of light of the understory cotton in young jujube plantations. Field Crops Res. 2017, 213, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlson, M.; Ostwald, M.; Reese, H.; Bazié, H.R.; Tankoano, B. Assessing the potential of multi-seasonal WorldView-2 imagery for mapping West African agroforestry tree species. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2016, 50, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sida, T.S.; Baudron, F.; Kim, H.; Giller, K.E. Climate-smart agroforestry: Faidherbia albida trees buffer wheat against climatic extremes in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 248, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maskell, G.; Chemura, A.; Nguyen, H.; Gornott, C.; Mondal, P. Integration of Sentinel optical and radar data for mapping smallholder coffee production systems in Vietnam. Remote Sens. Environ. 2021, 266, 112709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pippi, L.; Alibani, M.; Acito, N.; Antichi, D.; Caruso, G.; Fontanelli, M.; Moretti, M.; Nali, C.; Pampana, S.; Pellegrini, E.; et al. Hyperspectral Detection of Single and Combined Effects of Simulated Tree Shading and Alternaria alternata Infection on Sorghum bicolor, from Leaf to UAV-Canopy Scale. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ndoli, A.; Baudron, F.; Schut, A.G.; Mukuralinda, A.; Giller, K.E. Disentangling the positive and negative effects of trees on maize performance in smallholdings of Northern Rwanda. Field Crops Res. 2017, 213, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosati, A.; Wolz, K.J.; Murphy, L.; Ponti, L.; Jose, S. Modeling light below tree canopies overestimates net photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency in understory crops by averaging light in space and time. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2020, 284, 107892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pippi, L.; Alibani, M.; Antichi, D.; Caruso, G.; Finocchi, M.; Fontanelli, M.; Moretti, M.; Nali, C.; Pellegrini, E.; Peruzzi, A.; et al. Use of Digital Technologies into Agroforestry Systems: A Review. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122671
Pippi L, Alibani M, Antichi D, Caruso G, Finocchi M, Fontanelli M, Moretti M, Nali C, Pellegrini E, Peruzzi A, et al. Use of Digital Technologies into Agroforestry Systems: A Review. Agronomy. 2025; 15(12):2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122671
Chicago/Turabian StylePippi, Lorenzo, Michael Alibani, Daniele Antichi, Giovanni Caruso, Matteo Finocchi, Marco Fontanelli, Michele Moretti, Cristina Nali, Elisa Pellegrini, Andrea Peruzzi, and et al. 2025. "Use of Digital Technologies into Agroforestry Systems: A Review" Agronomy 15, no. 12: 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122671
APA StylePippi, L., Alibani, M., Antichi, D., Caruso, G., Finocchi, M., Fontanelli, M., Moretti, M., Nali, C., Pellegrini, E., Peruzzi, A., Ripamonti, A., Risoli, S., Silvestri, N., Tramacere, L. G., & Cotrozzi, L. (2025). Use of Digital Technologies into Agroforestry Systems: A Review. Agronomy, 15(12), 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15122671

