Mango Fruit Fly Trap Detection Using Different Wireless Communications
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The manuscript proposes a procedure for fly detection using various wireless communications. The results are interesting and the developed procedure can be useful in practice. The originality/novelty of the study should be indicated in more detail in the Abstract and Introduction.
Additionally, the objective should be more clearly presented in the Abstract.
All abbreviations should be explained when used for the first time.
lines 30-33: References should be newer.
line 94: Please delete it.
line 98: Please add more detailed information on the bait.
line 175: Please correct it.
Figure 8a,c: Were there any better resolution images?
Table 2. Effect of illuminance in raw RGB image data: Are these average results?
line 398: Only one species?
lines 404-406: The numbers were very small. It should be discussed in more detail.
Directions for further research to improve the approach should be indicated in more detail.
Author Response
An answer to each question has been made. The article look much better.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
-Please arrange the manuscript according to journal template requirements. -I understand that there is a word limit to writing an abstract! However, the research objective and your contribution should be mentioned. -Please change the position of Figure 2. -The explanation of the figures should be mentioned in the text before the figures. Please make changes all over the manuscript. -The figure should have a title and a, and b figures also should have separate titles. Please change the explanation of the figures all over the manuscript. -Figure 13 possesses no information, I would recommend deleting and required information to mention in the text. -Pages 296-302 should be written in the methods and methodology section as long as contains no research results. -There is no explanation for Figure 20. Why is the number of flies in the 2021 year different than in other years?Language is acceptable! however, there are some mistakes. For example, zero or cero? Please check the mistakes all over the manuscript!
Author Response
I change image 2, in all the headings are fixed and the number within the text first
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The corrections made are not satisfactory.
After the explanations and revision of the manuscript, the shortcomings in research design and research quality are even more visible.
Author Response
Please see the first page of agronomy article
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
I have not got a satisfactory response to my comments! What I got as a response is your manuscript
Author Response
All the figures were rechecked and appear in the text before the image. The english was rechecked. The abstract was rewritten.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 3
Reviewer 1 Report
The manuscript has been improved
Reviewer 2 Report
good
