Next Article in Journal
GISH Analysis of the Introgression of the B Subgenome Genetic Material of Wild Allotetraploid Species Solanum stoloniferum into Backcrossing Progenies with Potato
Previous Article in Journal
Using the CERES-Maize Model to Simulate Crop Yield in a Long-Term Field Experiment in Hungary
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparing Efficacy of Different Biostimulants for Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)

1
Institute of Urban Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IUA-CAAS), Chengdu National Agricultural Science and Technology Center (NASC), Chengdu 610213, China
2
Vegetable Germplasm Innovation and Variety Improvement Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Horticulture Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610066, China
3
Department of Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Xi’an 712100, China
4
Boe Houji Technology (Beijing) Co., Beijing 100144, China
5
Leading Bio-Agricultural Co., Ltd., Qinhuangdao 066004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 786; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040786
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 19 March 2022 / Accepted: 21 March 2022 / Published: 24 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Plant Nutrition Biofortification)

Abstract

Biostimulants can enhance horticultural crop production. However, their application in hydroponically grown lettuce is still limited, and information regarding their relative efficacy is lacking. A greenhouse trial was conducted to address this issue. Five nutrient solution treatments were evaluated on two lettuce cultivars: butterhead and red oak-leaf. The treatments included a half-strength modified Hoagland solution (Hs-H); a full-strength modified Hoagland solution (Fs-H); and Hs-H supplemented with 50 mg L−1 fulvic acid (FA), 334 mg L−1 seaweed extract (SE), or 5 mL L−1 gamma polyglutamic acid (PGA). The results indicated that the shoot biomass observed after biostimulant supplementation was significantly greater than or comparable to that observed with Fs-H. Nutrient solutions supplemented with SE and PGA led to a greater increase in the root biomass than that realized with Hs-H and Fs-H treatments. The Hs-H + FA treatment resulted in the lowest root-to-shoot ratio on a fresh weight basis among all treatments. The nitrate concentration in the shoot was significantly reduced following biostimulant supplementation compared to that realized with Fs-H and Hs-H treatments. Nutrient solutions supplemented with SE and PGA also decreased soluble sugar concentrations compared to that achieved using Hs-H and Fs-H treatments. FA and SE improved nutrient uptake for both cultivars, but PGA had a minimal effect on nutrient uptake. The two cultivars varied in their responses to biostimulant supplementation with regard to biomass, quality traits, and nutrient uptake. This study supports using fulvic acid and seaweed extract, rather than γ-PGA, in hydroponic lettuce production systems.
Keywords: biostimulants; seaweed extract; fulvic acid; γ-PGA; biomass; quality; nutrient uptake biostimulants; seaweed extract; fulvic acid; γ-PGA; biomass; quality; nutrient uptake

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Yang, R.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, C.; Li, J.; Qi, Z.; Yang, Q. Comparing Efficacy of Different Biostimulants for Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy 2022, 12, 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040786

AMA Style

Wang Z, Yang R, Liang Y, Zhang S, Zhang Z, Sun C, Li J, Qi Z, Yang Q. Comparing Efficacy of Different Biostimulants for Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):786. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040786

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zheng, Rui Yang, Ying Liang, Shulan Zhang, Zejin Zhang, Chaohua Sun, Jing Li, Zhiyong Qi, and Qichang Yang. 2022. "Comparing Efficacy of Different Biostimulants for Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040786

APA Style

Wang, Z., Yang, R., Liang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Z., Sun, C., Li, J., Qi, Z., & Yang, Q. (2022). Comparing Efficacy of Different Biostimulants for Hydroponically Grown Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Agronomy, 12(4), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040786

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop