Next Article in Journal
Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization in Kale and Swede for Grazing
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping Productivity and Essential Biophysical Parameters of Cultivated Tropical Grasslands from Sentinel-2 Imagery
Previous Article in Journal
Crop Response to Low Phosphorus Bioavailability with a Focus on Tomato
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping Maize Cropping Patterns in Dak Lak, Vietnam Through MODIS EVI Time Series
Open AccessArticle

Optimizing Gaussian Process Regression for Image Time Series Gap-Filling and Crop Monitoring

Image Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, University of Valencia, Paterna, 46980 Valencia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2020, 10(5), 618; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050618
Received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 20 April 2020 / Accepted: 22 April 2020 / Published: 27 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Agricultural Monitoring)
Image processing entered the era of artificial intelligence, and machine learning algorithms emerged as attractive alternatives for time series data processing. Satellite image time series processing enables crop phenology monitoring, such as the calculation of start and end of season. Among the promising algorithms, Gaussian process regression (GPR) proved to be a competitive time series gap-filling algorithm with the advantage of, as developed within a Bayesian framework, providing associated uncertainty estimates. Nevertheless, the processing of time series images becomes computationally inefficient in its standard per-pixel usage, mainly for GPR training rather than the fitting step. To mitigate this computational burden, we propose to substitute the per-pixel optimization step with the creation of a cropland-based precalculations for the GPR hyperparameters θ . To demonstrate our approach hardly affects the accuracy in fitting, we used Sentinel-2 LAI time series over an agricultural region in Castile and Leon, North-West Spain. The performance of image reconstructions were compared against the standard per-pixel GPR time series processing. Results showed that accuracies were on the same order (RMSE 0.1767 vs. 0.1564 [ m 2 / m 2 ] , 12% RMSE degradation) whereas processing time accelerated about 90 times. We further evaluated the alternative option of using the same hyperparameters for all the pixels within the complete scene. It led to similar overall accuracies over crop areas and computational performance. Crop phenology indicators were also calculated for the three different approaches and compared. Results showed analogous crop temporal patterns, with differences in start and end of growing season of no more than five days. To the benefit of crop monitoring applications, all the gap-filling and phenology indicators retrieval techniques have been implemented into the freely downloadable GUI toolbox DATimeS. View Full-Text
Keywords: Gaussian processes regression; time series; crop monitoring; Sentinel-2; phenology indicators; optimization Gaussian processes regression; time series; crop monitoring; Sentinel-2; phenology indicators; optimization
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Belda, S.; Pipia, L.; Morcillo-Pallarés, P.; Verrelst, J. Optimizing Gaussian Process Regression for Image Time Series Gap-Filling and Crop Monitoring. Agronomy 2020, 10, 618.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop