Tuning Wittig Stereoselectivity in Thienostilbene Synthesis via Optimized Reaction Conditions in Batch and Flow Systems
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Experimental Survey of Reaction Conditions
2.2. Statistical Analysis of the Experimental Results of the Wittig Reaction
2.2.1. Spearman Correlation Matrix
2.2.2. Principal Component Analysis
2.2.3. Response Surface Modelling
2.3. Wittig Reaction in a Batch and Flow Reactor Under Optimal Conditions
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Reagents and Solvents
3.2. Solubility Determination
3.3. Wittig Reaction Experiments
3.3.1. Batch Experiments
3.3.2. Flow Experiment
3.4. HPLC Analysis
3.5. Statistical Analyses of the Data from the Wittig Reaction Experiments
3.5.1. Spearman Correlation Matrix
3.5.2. Principal Components Analysis
3.5.3. Response Surface Modelling
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CPME | Cyclopentyl methyl ether |
| EtOAc | Ethyl-acetate |
| EtOH, abs. | Absolute ethanol |
| n-BuOH | n-butanol |
| MEK | Methyl ethyl ketone |
| MTBE | Methyl tert-butyl ether |
| NaOH | Sodium hydroxide |
| KOH | Potassium hydroxide |
| ACN | Acetonitrile |
| MeOH | Methanol |
| H3PO4 | Phosphoric acid |
| BuOAc | Butyl acetate |
| NaOEt | Sodium ethoxide |
| KOtBu | Potassium tert-butoxide |
| KHMDS | Potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide |
| NaHMDS | Sodium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide |
| THF | Tetrahydrofuran |
| DCM | Dichloromethane |
| 2-MeTHF | 2-methyltetrahydrofuran |
| DMF | N,N-dimethylformamide |
| LiHMDS | Lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide |
References
- Cuenca, A.B.; Fernández, E. Boron-Wittig olefination with gem-bis(boryl)alkanes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilia, G.; Simulescu, V.; Plesu, N.; Chiriac, V.; Merghes, P. Wittig and Wittig–Horner Reactions under Sonication Conditions. Molecules 2023, 28, 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Nardi, F.; Gorreta, G.; Meazzo, C.; Parisotto, S.; Blangetti, M.; Prandi, C. Wittig Reaction in Deep Eutectic Solvents: Expanding the DES Toolbox in Synthesis. Chem. Eur. J. 2024, 30, e202402090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wysokowski, M.; Luu, R.K.; Arevalo, S.; Khare, E.; Stachowiak, W.; Niemczak, M.; Jesionowski, T.; Buehler, M.J. Untapped Potential of Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Synthesis of Bioinspired Inorganic-Organic Materials. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 7878–7903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Templ, J.; Michael, S. High-Energy Ball Milling Enables an Ultra-Fast Wittig Olefination under Ambient and Solvent-Free Conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202411536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reynes, J.F.; Leon, F.; Garcia, F. Mechanochemistry for Organic and Inorganic Synthesis. ACS Org. Inorg. Au 2024, 4, 432–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phelps, R.; Orr-Ewing, A.J. Direct Observation of the Dynamics of Ylide Solvation by Hydrogen-Bond Donors Using Time-Resolved Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 9330–9343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bofill, J.M.; Severi, M.; Quapp, W.; Ribas-Ariño, J.; Moreira, I.d.P.R.; Albareda, G. Optimal Oriented External Electric Fields to Trigger a Barrierless Oxaphosphetane Ring Opening Step of the Wittig Reaction. Chem. Eur. J. 2024, 30, e202400173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davison, N.; McMullin, C.; Zhang, L.; Hu, S.-X.; Waddell, P.; Wills, C.; Casey, D.; Lu, E. Li vs Na: Divergent Reaction Patterns between Organolithium and Organosodium Complexes and Ligand-Catalyzed Ketone/Aldehyde Methylenation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 6562–6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farfán, P.; Gómez, S.; Restrepo, A. On the origins of stereoselectivity in the Wittig reaction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2019, 728, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Savanura, M.R.S.; Garg, S.; Singh, S.K.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, S. Recent Advances in Phosphonium Salts-Mediated Synthetic Transformations. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2025, 14, e202500211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahart, A.J.C.; Beardmore, L.N.D.; Field, R.A.; Cosgrove, S.C.; Miller, G.J. Tandem One-Pot Biocatalytic Oxidation and Wittig Reaction in Water. Org. Lett. 2024, 26, 6642–6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bogatyrev, E.; Kodkin, V. A Minireview of Phase-Transfer Catalysis and Recent Trends. Biomedres 2022, 45, 36691–36702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ljubić, A.; Vušak, V.; Cingesar, I.K.; Vrsaljko, D.; Šalić, A.; Škorić, I. Application of natural deep eutectic solvents in the continuous process for synthesis of resveratrol analogues by the Wittig reaction. J. Flow Chem. 2025, 15, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ljubić, A.; Šalić, A.; Škorić, I. Synthesis of Hydroxylated Stilbenes in a Batch and Flow Reactor: An Overview. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e20230337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikaš, I.; Horváth, O.; Škorić, I. Functionalization of the benzobicyclo[3.2.1]octadiene skeleton via photocatalytic and thermal oxygenation of a furan derivative. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 6255–6259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mlakić, M.; Čadež, T.; Barić, D.; Puček, I.; Ratković, A.; Marinić, Ž.; Lasić, K.; Kovarik, Z.; Škorić, I. New Uncharged 2-Thienostilbene Oximes as Reactivators of Organophosphate-Inhibited Cholinesterases. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roman, B.I.; De Coen, L.M.; Mortier, S.T.F.C.; De Ryck, T.; Vanhoecke, B.W.A.; Katritzky, A.R.; Bracke, M.E.; Stevens, C.V. Design, synthesis and structure-activity relationships of some novel, highly potent anti-invasive (E)- and (Z)-stilbenes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 17, 5054–5063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, P.A.; Rajendran, K.V.; Muldoon, J.; Gilheany, D.G. A convenient and mild chromatography-free method for the purification of the products of Wittig and Appel reactions. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 3531–3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathiyamoorthy, V.; Bairwa, K.; Duche, S.; Roy, A.; Mathur, A. 2-Methyl tetrahydrofuran: A green organic modifier for eco-friendly, cost-effective, and rapid purification in drug discovery. Anal. Methods 2025, 15, 2938–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali Khan, Z.; Iqbal, A.; Shahzad, S.A. Synthetic approaches toward stilbenes and their related structures. Mol. Divers. 2017, 21, 483–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Šinkovec, E.; Krajnc, M. Phase Transfer Catalyzed Wittig Reaction in the Microtube Reactor under Liquis-Liquid Slug-Flow Pattern. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2011, 15, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byrne, P.A.; Gilheany, D.G. The modern interpretation of the Wittig reaction mechanism. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6670–6696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, C. Importance of Using Modern Regression Analysis for Response Surface Models in Science and Technology. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mlakić, M.; Faraho, I.; Odak, I.; Talić, S.; Vukovinski, A.; Raspudić, A.; Bosnar, M.; Zadravec, R.; Ratković, A.; Lasić, K.; et al. Synthesis, photochemistry and computational study of novel 1,2,3-triazole heterostilbenes: Expressed biological activity of their electrocyclization photoproducts. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 121, e105701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






| Solvent | Solubility |
|---|---|
| BuOAc | • |
| n-BuOH | • (157–162 mg/mL) |
| CPME | • |
| DCM | • (91–94 mg/mL) |
| EtOAc | • |
| MEK | • |
| 2-MeTHF | • |
| MTBE | • |
| Experiment | Base Type | Base Quantity, mol eq | Solvent Type | Solvent Quantity, V eq | System Type ** | Time, h | trans-/cis-Isomer Ratio | Conversion, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NaOEt | 1.10 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 16 | 1.74 | 35.2 |
| 2 | NaOEt | 1.16 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 45 | 2.01 | 37.4 |
| 3 | NaOEt | 1.16 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 45 | 2.06 | 37.2 |
| 4 | NaOEt | 1.16 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 45 | 2.00 | 21.9 |
| 5 | NaOEt | 1.99 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 69 | 2.00 | 63.0 |
| 6 | KOtBu | 1.10 | EtOH | 116 | one-phase | 69 | 2.08 | 92.8 |
| 7 | KOtBu | 1.10 | THF | 116 | one-phase | 15 | 2.91 | 92.9 |
| 8 | KOtBu | 1.10 | DCM | 116 | one-phase | 15 | 1.32 | 98.4 |
| 9 | NaOH (3 mol/L water solution) | 6.01 | DCM | 10.0 | two-phase | 15.5 | 1.05 | 92.2 |
| 10 | KOtBu | 1.10 | ACN | 116 | one-phase | 15 | 1.20 | 68.5 |
| 11 | KOtBu | 1.10 | 2-MeTHF | 116 | one-phase | 15 | 3.26 | 81.0 |
| 12 | KOtBu | 1.10 | DMF | 116 | one-phase | 63 | 1.39 | 98.1 |
| 13 | NaOH (3 mol/L water solution) | 6.01 | 2-MeTHF | 10.0 | two-phase | 63 | 1.41 | 93.6 |
| 14 | LiHMDS (1.3 mol/L THF solution) | 1.10 | DMF | 109 | one-phase | 16 | 1.37 | 71.8 |
| 15 | LiHMDS (1 mol/L hexane solution) | 1.10 | DMF | 163 | one-phase | 15 | 1.38 | 62.6 |
| 16 | KHMDS | 1.13 | 2-MeTHF | 116 | one-phase | 21 | 1.16 | 59.4 |
| 17 | NaHMDS | 1.10 | 2-MeTHF | 116 | one-phase | 21 | 3.30 | 76.2 |
| 18 | KOH (2 mol/L water solution) | 6.01 | DCM | 45.0 | two-phase | 21 | 1.01 | 94.0 |
| 19 | KOH (2 mol/L water solution) | 6.01 | n-BuOH | 45.00 | two-phase | 16 | 1.24 | 64.6 |
| 20 | NaOH (3 mol/L water solution) | 6.01 | n-BuOH | 45.00 | two-phase | 16 | 1.47 | 71.6 |
| Value Number | Eigenvalue | % Total Variance | Cumulative Eigenvalue | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0787 | 53.9342 | 1.0787 | 53.9349 |
| 2 | 0.7213 | 36.0650 | 1.8000 | 89.9992 |
| 3 | 0.1823 | 9.1152 | 1.9823 | 99.1144 |
| 4 | 0.0177 | 0.8856 | 2 | 100 |
| Variable | SS | df | MS | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) Base Type (L) | 0.8567 | 1 | 0.8567 | 989.8 | 0.0010 |
| (2) Base Quantity (L) | 2.0685 | 1 | 2.0685 | 2389.9 | 0.0004 |
| (3) Solvent Type (L) | 0.0206 | 1 | 0.0206 | 23.8 | 0.0396 |
| (4) Solvent Quantity (L) | 1.0556 | 1 | 1.0556 | 1219.6 | 0.0008 |
| (5) Time (L) | 0.0167 | 1 | 0.0167 | 19.3 | 0.0481 |
| (6) System Type (L) | 1.8633 | 1 | 1.8633 | 2152.9 | 0.0005 |
| 1L by 2L | 2.2003 | 1 | 2.2003 | 2542.2 | 0.0004 |
| 1L by 3L | 0.0851 | 1 | 0.0851 | 98.3 | 0.0100 |
| 1L by 4L | 1.3877 | 1 | 1.3877 | 1603.4 | 0.0006 |
| 1L by 5L | 0.0215 | 1 | 0.0215 | 24.9 | 0.0379 |
| 1L by 6L | 1.3646 | 1 | 1.3646 | 1576.6 | 0.0006 |
| 2L by 3L | 0.0080 | 1 | 0.0080 | 9.2 | 0.0935 |
| 2L by 4L | 1.3887 | 1 | 1.3887 | 1604.5 | 0.0006 |
| 2L by 5L | 0.0307 | 1 | 0.0307 | 35.5 | 0.0271 |
| 3L by 5L | 0.2149 | 1 | 0.2149 | 248.3 | 0.0040 |
| Lack of Fit | 0.0139 | 2 | 0.0677 | 37.6 | 0.1505 |
| Pure Error | 0.0017 | 2 | 0.0009 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ljubić, A.; Jurinjak Tušek, A.; Šalić, A.; Škorić, I. Tuning Wittig Stereoselectivity in Thienostilbene Synthesis via Optimized Reaction Conditions in Batch and Flow Systems. Catalysts 2026, 16, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020151
Ljubić A, Jurinjak Tušek A, Šalić A, Škorić I. Tuning Wittig Stereoselectivity in Thienostilbene Synthesis via Optimized Reaction Conditions in Batch and Flow Systems. Catalysts. 2026; 16(2):151. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020151
Chicago/Turabian StyleLjubić, Anabela, Ana Jurinjak Tušek, Anita Šalić, and Irena Škorić. 2026. "Tuning Wittig Stereoselectivity in Thienostilbene Synthesis via Optimized Reaction Conditions in Batch and Flow Systems" Catalysts 16, no. 2: 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020151
APA StyleLjubić, A., Jurinjak Tušek, A., Šalić, A., & Škorić, I. (2026). Tuning Wittig Stereoselectivity in Thienostilbene Synthesis via Optimized Reaction Conditions in Batch and Flow Systems. Catalysts, 16(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020151

